Simulink Tutorial - 61 - MBD Interview Questions | Part 2

[@venkatsaikumarpolasi890]

I really like the way you were making videos on Simulink, looking forward for more. I have faced an interview question like how can we customize the execution order of the blocks in a model?? Plz do videos on scaling, fixed point tool conversion, precision loss 🔥👍👍👍

[@upenderrao1044]

yes madam.. please do more videos on simulink thank you

[@invisible-fm6lz]

Welcome back

[@Arjun-wk9sd]

Hi mam,when we are using relational operator it will check first value greater than second value so in that counter the result is always zero.The connection need to reverse.

[@simulinktutorial9086]

Hi Arjun, thanks for pointing out. The connection to relational operator should have been other way around. Would take care of it now onwards 😊 I am updating video description. Point here to note that, people should not copy the logic blindly because while recording such mistake can happen specially when it is not simulated. Glad that you checked it.

[@CreativeJunior1226]

really very much helpful

[@rashmitippannavar9105]

for down counter, the counter should be set with maximum value mentioned right? because we will be decrementing the counter value till it reaches 0 i.e. if the counter has to go for 5 loops then cnt=5, then cnt=cnt-1, check till cnt=0 correct me if i am wrong!

[@aswinig6547]

very informative madam

[@roshanmurali3105]

Can you make more videos on this topic, also on Matlab design based questions.

[@GautamKumar-mx8cq]

Will you please tell me how to construct a clock in simulink??

[@hiramansuryawanshi2025]

What are the benefits of atomic subsystem over virtual subsystem

[@ravikantmorye9921]

Thank you!!!

[@matakalahazarath581]

Hello Madam I want hear from you about floating point vs fixed point concept in MBD?

[@baranipriya8078]

Can you explain about virtual and non virtual blocks?

[@rashmibhamare2533]

There seems to be issue with logic implemented for up down counter.. you don't need the entry condition in the simpledec1 state

[@simulinktutorial9086]

The point for this implementation was to count from 0 to up and decrement from 0 to negative and not -ve to +ve and vice versa. It's just an example and not the core implementation. If you are expecting -ve to +ve and vice versa the implementation will change for both states and not just simpledec1

[@jitendernimiwal8128]

Can you upload video on Targetlink

[@simulinktutorial9086]

I cannot demonstrate it as I don't have dspace Targetlink license and HW or node lock license. I'll try if can give overview but still things are usually clearer when demonstrated.