Sonic Superstars Graphics Comparison (Switch vs. PS5)

See how Sonic Superstars looks on PS5 and Switch side-by-side!
0:00 Wipe Comparison
0:30 Side-by-Side Comparison
__
Video by: Joey Ferris
Thumbnail by: Tom Arnold
__
➤ TIKTOK: / gamexplain
➤ X: / gamexplain
➤ INSTAGRAM: / gamexplain_official
➤ TWITCH: www.twitch.com/GameXplain
#sonicsuperstars #sonicthehedgehog #sonic

[@ndDavilos]

Really glad for the little optimizations they made for the Switch version so it could run at 60fps. Looks like they changed just the right amount to maintain a balance of quality to performance.

[@pvzmariosonica8fan]

I honestly think this is the first Sonic game since Mania to run at 60FPS on Switch

[@TheMiningMeteor]

Wait until you use super sonic for the first time lmao

[@yass3425]

​@@TheMiningMeteor lol

[@orangessbu2450]

apparently the docked version is 720p even though handheld mode runs perfect so Nintendo didn't even try to upscale the resolution

[@MirrorHall_Clay]

​@@orangessbu2450Nintendo didn't make the switch version.

[@juansanchez209]

Honestly? As long as it’s not ATROCIOUS like MK1 was, I don’t mind downgraded graphics on Switch because I think the portability more than makes up for it. As a college student, being able to play between classes or on the subway is amazing!

[@monkeygameplay5455]

Yeah id rather have a portable blurry screen to play on everywhere than a crisp one all playing alone in my room , portable consoles are the future hybrid one are future*2

[@monkeygameplay5455]

@@LinkBlade24 heard look at the video its pretty blurry but common its not THAT ugly lol

[@davidhill8565]

What also makes up for low specs is energy efficiency.

[@monkeygameplay5455]

@@davidhill8565 youll get used to it especially if you dont see the better looking version for a time

[@Enigmalake]

Switch people would rather play pong than Spider-Man 2. But it’s “portable” I can play on my parents toilet

[@infernal_monkey]

I like that you can actually see the backgrounds in the Switch version.

[@kingkazma3246]

IKR? 😂

[@RobyMicrobi]

Exactly my thoughts. Why did they have to blur the background on ps5. All the detail effort to just hide it away, and on the higher console? I hate it when devs think that "blurring" to give a depth of field is an "awesome feature".... most gamers prefer to see sharp details, not a blurry mess...I hope there is a setting to chose on or off.

[@cvdinjapan7935]

@@RobyMicrobi I think it's to let you focus on the stage and easily differentiate between stage elements and background elements. When everything is racing by at high speed, it may help have a clear visual distinction of what you can land on/interact with.

[@gazpaviles7909]

That's not a good thing on Golden Capital or Lagoon stages

[@FlamesOverdrive]

You can turn off the blur

[@KayFiOS]

I think the only complaint I have is that waterfalls are not transparent in the switch version, but other than that, they did an amazing job optimizing!

[@cvdinjapan7935]

You don't care that the dragon in the video didn't crash through the stage like it does in the PS5 version?

[@thundergodgamer118]

The far background looks waaay to blurry on the PS5. Look at this video again. Look at how blurry the far background looks on the PS5. The Nintendo switch backgrounds looks very clear and great. You can't even see the textures on the PS5 far background. While the switch version you could see how nice and clear it looks. I want it for the switch plus you could play hand held mode as well. They both look great though 🎮🎮

[@cvdinjapan7935]

@@thundergodgamer118 The reason the background is blurry is so that the background is more distinguishable from the foreground. If everything is in focus at the same time, then it's less obvious what you can land on and what is just background in the heat of the moment. The PS5 footage also has more dynamic stage transitions (look at how the Switch version doesn't have the dragon crashing through the stage), and the PS release also has trophies, which the Switch doesn't. So the PS version has more going on in the stage, more features, and it can still be played on a handheld via remote play.

[@Flygsand]

@@cvdinjapan7935 Remote play is in no way a good handheld experience.

[@M64bros]

What I love about this game so far is how classic Sonic has a lot more facial expression like you can see He's disappointed while waiting for the player to control him, how long with some other facial animations as well to give him some more personality. True Sonic generations and sonic forces did this but honestly I like Sonic superstars take on Classic Sonic's animation style a little better

[@M.R.Gorilla]

You mean Forces? Frontiers didn't have classic sonic

[@M64bros]

​​@@M.R.GorillaOh yeah forces, Thank you! (I just fixed it up)

[@M.R.Gorilla]

@@M64bros no problem (sorry for late reply)

[@saltyaces8621]

@@M.R.Gorilla gay

[@M.R.Gorilla]

@@saltyaces8621 why

[@stale_cheeto]

glad to know that the switch version still looks good despite having downgraded graphics

[@rafaelc.c.]

I don't know why they downgraded it so much. It still looks good but it looks like a 3DS game. The lighting, some textures and the pixelation.

[@BlueAizu_]

​​@@rafaelc.c.They're likely sacrifices they made so the game can run at 60 FPS. Game feel is king in games like 2D Sonic, so it's better to have less pretty graphics in return for more fluid gameplay.

[@isaacvasquez4401]

@@rafaelc.c. no way it looks like 3ds. You probably don’t remember what 3ds looks like. People seem to exaggerate about Switch graphics.

[@superduper6419]

Don’t overestimate the power of switch. Switch can barely handle 60fps so I’m sure developers had no choice but to downgrade it so that they can make game run on 60fps

[@superduper6419]

@@isaacvasquez4401yeah not 3ds but clearly it looks just super mid on switch tbh due to weak power of switch

[@XXtheJUMPoffXX]

This is a much better Switch port than Sonic Frontiers

[@RiceCooker-san]

It's clear sega tried their best to get sonic frontiers to run right but it's a open world game

[@markwebster4996]

Looks pretty good on Switch. Compares well to the PS5 version which of course has more detail.

[@Dorian_Scott]

More detail overall, but the backgrounds are so blurry.

[@Kurayamiblack]

I noticed that too. There are some things about the Switch I like better such as the sharper backgrounds and the color blending feeling more natural to the environments, but the PS5 seems to excel in lighting, texture contrast, and smoothness.

[@Fabricio37500]

Honestly, I prefer the blurry backgrounds from the PS5 version. The ones on the Switch version just look too pixelated and I think they would benefit from being just a little bit blurrier. Not to say the game looks bad on Switch though.

[@chop46878]

The “blurry” background is the depth of field, it’s possible to turn off on PC not sure on PS5/Xbox.

[@Itsjayduhhhhh]

Having played the switch version This past week, it’s not distracting It’s a great port

[@Kriskirby1992]

I'm satisfied with what we got, but still I can't wait for Sonic games on the Switch 2 to look even better

[@ryanr27]

If we even ARE getting a Switch 2, they haven’t confirmed it yet

[@rafaelc.c.]

They could have pushed the game so much more in the Switch. It is capable of a lot.

[@StJimmy765]

@@ryanr27 Bruh, the Switch 2 (probably not what it’ll be called) is Nintendo’s worst-kept secret we’ve seen, and that’s saying something.

[@MDGamestation]

I wasn't used to how Superstars looked on switch because all footage I have seen from the game was from the ps5/pc version. I don't mind, the main thing is performance is smooth which it is for the most part

[@setsers1]

Looks WAY better than MK1 did on Switch.

[@M64bros]

Indeed!

[@hunterfoster2610]

Facts

[@MetaGamingDojo]

😁

[@dustin360]

Not exactly a fair comparison, but ok

[@rpizzaspaghetti2718]

​@dustin360 I know what you mean, but at least the Sonic team took their time to polish the game where as netherrealms just ported the steam version. What a joke

[@XboxWrestlingFed]

Both versions look good. It was obvious the PS5 was gonna be sharper and have other benefits like the depth of field, higher resolution and much better AA. But i dont think the Switch owners have been short changed here like they were with Colors Ultimate or Frontiers.

[@esmooth919]

Or MK1. MK11 looked better

[@cnk9822]

Frontiers on switch works very well actually.

[@iiokrammii693]

@@cnk9822 Runs fine, but the graphics is what his point was abt lol

[@IDK3679.]

​@@cnk9822Absolutely not

[@gustavojoserodriguez7475]

In second 0:33, Nintendo looks better

[@windowschamp3799]

I've only played a few minutes of the Switch version and while the concessions in graphics and ability are perfectly adequate for the game to run on a 6.5 year old portable platform with decent battery life, I have to say the load times can be pretty sluggish. Like I don't expect instantaneous load times, but it felt like I waited a half a minute (was in reality probably less, it just feels long) more often than not and it is noticeable especially when it needs to happen between acts of a zone.

[@EnchantedSmellyWolf]

The Nintendo wins for me because the blur background is distracting to my eyes. Thanks, Nintnedo!

[@jiggylookback]

I actually agree with this! I didn’t really like the blurred backgrounds

[@leawgabriel]

Agreed! Some things I cannot understand

[@DeanT1987]

You would think they’d blur the Switch version because it’s a lot less powerful than the PS5/XSX

[@jiggylookback]

@@DeanT1987 we need to bring back the fog!

[@TheComemnter]

U can turn the blur off…

[@black2785]

I like that the back ground is less blurry and there’s just a bit of jaggies that capture the essence of older sonic games on the Switch. Though the clean crispy ballon like graphics for the PS5 is also refreshing

[@richardfranklin6003]

lmao it's because switch can't handle the depth of field effect.

[@LZMP60]

The jaggies don't capture the essence of old Sonic games lool it's a lack of power

[@MikuCobraCole]

I don't like DoF but jagged edges are not a feature wtf dude

[@HugoElcabezas]

@@richardfranklin6003 not, actually i like it more without the depth of field effect but I probably go for the PS5 version to record my game, but on the other side with that effect it looks that you can focus better en gameplay, would be better more dynamic on ps5

[@richardfranklin6003]

Fanboys will spin anything into a positive lol@@LZMP60

[@kevinmurphy6679]

Of course PS5 looks much better, but the Switch version looks surprisingly good too.

[@rafaelc.c.]

Surprisingly? The Switch could perfectly run the PS5 version. It now looks almost like a 3DS game.

[@originalname1008]

@rafaelc.c. I dont know if it could. but it could probably look better than this if it was better optimised. Third party games look a lot worse on switch cus they're making the game for multiple consoles so they don't prioritise optimising the game for switch since its not the only console it's releasing on so they downgrade the graphics.

[@BowserEditz]

​@@rafaelc.c.your joking right ? A handheld can't able ps5 graphics

[@paulgilbert5278]

Switch isn’t necessarily a dedicated handheld console it’s just that it’s essentially a souped up Wii U is why it doesn’t look as good

[@spiritrealmking9416]

Why do we still bother with doing these comparisons. Y’all act like the switch is gonna somehow look better than the ps5. Some people just want there retro games on handheld devices and the FPS on a home console. Its not rocket science just preference of gaming for specific titles in my opinion that is

[@CheckOutMyPokemons]

Most important thing for me is if it runs well and looks like it does! Will probably pick it up

[@Teknoman]

I'm fine with switch not having the depth of field effect so strongly pronounced

[@esmooth919]

Same. Faraway objects don't look _that_ blurry IRL. Lol

[@chrissanford1444]

@@esmooth919 I really like that background objects better on the switch version, but that ps5 detail in the front is nice. haha I'm torn on what to get it on

[@BlueAizu_]

​@@chrissanford1444You honestly can't go wrong either way. Switch lets you play on the go, while PS5 is guaranteed to play like a dream in co-op (plus Trophy support!).

[@thenonexistinghero]

@@esmooth919 Depth of field is mostly something from videos and pictures. Real eyesight doesn't have depth of field. At least, not the kind that's anything like what we see in movies/games/pictures. Same for motion blur.

[@Cubbie410]

Thank you game explain.. I was waiting to see a comparison of the 2 versions. I might just have to get both

[@nanodude3347]

I always get the PS4/5 version of games that do come out on multiple consoles but Switch looks pretty good

[@rathernotsay1648]

is this vid's switch gameplay recorded from the tv or tablet? cuz there's a difference in resolution (1080p for the tv, 720p for the tablet)

[@guntherhuemer1767]

in handheld mode this looks perfectly fine on that small screen!

[@Triple8Bit]

Although the colours aren’t as vibrant as the PS5, it still looks perfectly fine for a sonic game

[@astrobollo]

I don't think this downgrade in graphics is reasonable when Super Mario Bros Wonder is around the corner and it looks almost as sharp as the PS5 version of Sonic Superstars.

[@kendo9040]

I agree, compare either version to tropical freeze and they look like ass...

[@evolutioner8573]

bro super mario bros wonder looks very nice but not close as nice as sonic superstars

[@BozQ]

Very minimal downgrade for the Switch. But the 60fps is spot on!

[@cramlink6455]

If you play coop in the switch version does it turn to 30fps or it stays at 60fps? Thanks

[@FelipeRodrigoX]

down to 30fps

[@sagecentral1809]

I actually prefer the look of some stages on switch, they benefit without the blurry depth of field

[@richardfranklin6003]

cope

[@DeAthWaGer]

​@@richardfranklin6003how about you let people enjoy looking where they want and not being "told" by the game on where to focus? I also HATE depth of field blurring. It honestly makes the game look like their backgrounds are less detailed and they're covering it up. I turn that crap off on every PC game, ESPECIALLY fast-paced games like racers.

[@richardfranklin6003]

I was hoping someone would bite and you didn't disappoint @@DeAthWaGer The depth of field is the artist's intent - to improve the readability of the foreground - actually smart game design, especially the textures on switch are not meant to be unblurred.

[@bbbazzinga]

I agree, I prefer the unblurred backgrounds on the switch.

[@bbbazzinga]

​@@richardfranklin6003Go outside, enjoy the sun, touch some grass and make some friends, it'll be good for you. Trust me.

[@Dorian_Scott]

The PS5 version _does_ look better and has some visual effects that the Switch version is missing. But I think the Switch version still looks great despite its limitations.

[@sjodinable]

And both the PS5 and Switch versions look worse than Super Mario Wonder

[@slyp5409]

@@sjodinable I love how you say that with Wonder not being out yet, but also despite the fact no one asked.

[@DonutTPOTer]

not a fan of the blurry backgrounds on ps5 tbh

[@Dorian_Scott]

@@DonutTPOTer Same. The backgrounds look *WAY* better on Switch.

[@magicmizzleofficial]

@@DonutTPOTer i actually thought the same thing. the blurry backgrounds don't look good at all.

[@BigMacBurgr]

Tbh, I like how the Switch version looks more than the PS5. Yes, the PS5 is objectively better, but to me i feel the less detail of the Switch version is easier on my eyes for some reason. It's a lot brighter too so i feel i can just see more

[@jeanvilain93]

Yes, more precision in the 2nd plan on switch

[@xOzzyyy]

Honestly not that bad! A drop in resolution mostly but it looks just fine on both systems.

[@xOzzyyy]

@@ChiefMedicPururubut are you really staring at the shadows the entire time? That seriously can’t be a deal breaker for you

[@gamertheframer8802]

How does the switch version feel to play? Does it occasionally lag or anything?

[@christianzapata5283]

Dude from the comparison I’m getting flashbacks to the 3DS era Frick im going to cry again

[@rockinggamerdude]

0:58 wow

[@yrrr4871]

I WANT THIS GAME SO BADLY!!!!!

[@Universal035]

Awesome

[@finnfiasco]

Strange to note that they flat-out omit the blurring effect for the background details on Switch. You’d imagine it’d be to their benefit to have less detail, but I guess the blurring filter is somehow more intensive to run, so they just don’t use it on Switch? Weird.

[@VideoJamesNZ]

Whichever platform you have this game on, I hope you have a blast! I got it for PS5 but will probably end up getting it for Switch too. I FREAK'N LOVE THIS GAME!!! ❤

[@user-zp8ho7ci2h]

This is the first time I've actually wanted to play multiple versions of a Sonic game. They both look good in their own ways.

[@SierraSigma]

The backgrounds on the PS5 are all blurry? While I see the other improvements over the Switch, that's supposed to be better, is it?

[@Bluesupersonicgamerofficial]

I like both of them

[@RawPower867]

Switch version looks more pixel-y, but also has less blurry backgrounds. Not that it matters, because Switch version is my only option anyway. I don't have PS5.

[@chfgn]

As usual, the Switch version looks totally fine. When it’s not side-by-side you’ll never notice you’re missing anything.

[@fnaftuberandydoge]

the thing about switch games is that if you play them without comparing it to other consoles like the ps5 they look good (except for mortal kombat 1)

[@raymondtromp7769]

hey guys i want you to tell you something when you on your 4k flatscreen tv do you turn the dlc on or of

[@Pow3r-Up]

Maybe I'm crazy but I prefer the unblurred backgrounds of the Switch, the blur makes me feel a bit ill

[@spongebobfan78]

The Switch version looks like an upscaled 3DS game. Reminds me of the Dimps version of Generations.

[@Mister_Awesome]

Saw this same comparison on Twitter but watched here for Higher quality, the Switch Version isn’t bad by any means I’d gladly trade in better visuals over handheld, and more accessible Multiplayer

[@justinpenascosa]

I cannot wait for the Super Mario Bros. Wonder Graphics Compari - oh, wait.

[@dangerwarg9682]

I don't mind a downgrade in graphics. I rather a smooth, good performance than to put up with sub standard quality on the back of someone turning the settings too high. Having said that, I'mma getting the steam version over the Switch for only two reasons. 1) I want them colors and 2) My Switch is running out of space. xD

[@mexikann6248]

I might be crazy, but I actually like the colors better in the Switch version. I guess the lighting in the PS5 version makes the environment look cheap to me. It makes things like the trees look like plastic toys. The Switch environments fot better and look more colorful, I guess. I don't know how to explain it.

[@supersmashmaster43]

Without a comparison, you would never realize the downgrades that the Switch has. I’m gonna get this on PS5 when that time comes, but the Switch version still looks great for anyone that only can get the switch version

[@JakubSK]

@Sega can we have an option added to remove the blurring from the backgrounds? Thanks.

[@z-hop8180]

It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

[@barckthedarck7166]

Pienso que en Switch si le agregan el desenfoque de fondo podrian aumentar la resolución aumentando un poco el antialiasing.

[@tristantolkamp4991]

Looking decent at least it's 60fps on switch

[@ATSTB]

But its 30fps on co-op Just to let you know.

[@Unknown_User174]

@@ATSTB Maybe they probably did that in case if you play Co-Op online.

[@dennisx3397]

Is that for only 4 players or also 2 players?

[@ATSTB]

@@dennisx3397 Co-op is for 2 - 4 players

[@CybernautZero]

I got this on Switch. Honestly, it plays and looks good. The most notable thing is the lack of anti-aliasing but even that is not a big deal. I got it on Switch because this just feels like the sort of game that plays well as a portable title, like any of the 2D Sonic games.

[@Kraken1Kid]

1 thing i notice good is that the playeble carracter has no shadow at all

[@internetzone1178]

The game looks great on both platforms.

[@tsyumamatsuthehavenofguard32]

..oddly brighter color pallete. Honestly my worry is audio balance. I remember fighting and dying to silver hammer. ...I really don't want to do that again

[@josephcarr1482]

Love how the graphics are damn near identical switch is killing it love as a weak 9th gen console it it really impressive till this day

[@steveybiggunzgaming8118]

Any dualsense haptics or 120 fps mode ?

[@rofidel178]

Los indicadores de espacio (fondo con blur), los colores están más intensos y las texturas más nítidas en PS5

[@nemesisprime2993]

They both look good.

[@jayb8934]

In most cases, unless the difference isn't too extreme, I'll opt for the Switch version just because I love the hybrid console idea so much. Example, I got Doom and Doom Eternal on Switch even though I have a PS5. No regrets.

[@therealironix9577]

A bit interesting comparison, though I'm pretty sure the Switch can run with the same graphics as the others. I don't see a reason they can't make it the same as the other platforms but it's still look good regardless.

[@TheRealAN64]

yeah true, sometimes i feel like sega treats the switch like its only as powerful as the gameboy 😂

[@osc-omb47896]

​@@TheRealAN64or maybe they just don't have time to optimize?

[@starzlol3999]

Its probably because the switch is targeting 60fps in superstars. Turning up the graphics could make the performance a little more unstable. It still looks good tho so im not complaining

[@Cilverkid456]

​@@starzlol3999for a 2.5D game? Seriously? The Switch can handle that. It's not really PS5 level graphics it's rocking. Metroid Dread and Mario look better. Heck Yoka-Laylee The Impossible layer is 60fps and that's Unity game as well

[@BlueAizu_]

​@@Cilverkid456Neither Metroid nor Yooka have co-op, though, so it's a moot point. Mario's definitely a valid comparison, but then again Nintendo themselves are making it and they know their hardware best!

[@magolor2706]

I really don't mind the switch version if I'm being honest, I very much prefer it without the depth of field blur on all of the background.

[@NukeOTron]

Well, at least they committed to the 60 FPS. This strangely looks like a case of "...and nothing of value was lost."

[@Ephesians-yn8ux]

Looks almost unnoticeable

[@BlueStinger475]

Sonic Superstars is more of a cartoony styled game than it aiming to be realistic, so while it's downgraded, it's not downgraded that much cause it still looks amazing while it's at 60fps

[@abra_escaped]

I'm already dead set on getting it on switch (my only other option would be xbox one anyway), the somewhat flatter lighting doesn't really bother me

[@qwerty6789x]

how's the Input latency?

[@ATRichard]

It’s funny, because the *slightly* downgraded graphics in the Switch makes the game feel a little more like the classic Sonic games. Still looks good.

[@thenonexistinghero]

The graphical downgrade is huge though. Not just resolution, pretty much all effect are straight up turned off. And it's not like the game's graphics are all that great on the other systems. If they couldn't get 3D to run equally well on all systems I don't understand why they didn't just go for sprites or hand-drawn style instead.

[@angel2901]

Why is the background blurred on PS5?

[@pacario9625]

Can't decide if I prefer the depth-of-field (blurring effect) on the PS5 or not...

[@xervantezxvi5022]

@0:41 why is that so different why sonic back ground on 0:41 looks clear on switch than ps5 the ps5 version looks blurry?

[@Gladson]

I was playing a bit last night (switch) and thought it was looking a bit oversaturated. This video shows that the Switch version is indeed more saturaded when compared to the PS5 version. Might have to ajust the TV settings a bit.

[@kingkazma3246]

Some backgrounds are very blurry on PS5?

[@MikeAruba69]

Hey, the Switch version looks just as great as the PS5! I'm definitely getting the Switch version instead. I own Sonic Mania and Sonic Origins on the Switch, and so Sonic Superstars should be added as part of my Switch collection as well.

[@Sonicbat_]

We’re do u have frontiers?

[@BAKERTheLegend]

I did the same! I have a PS5 but I like the idea of being able to play Sonic wherever I like 💯

[@starsmashmations4969]

i didn’t notice it he lower res on my switch version, it looked just as vibrant and poppy to me but idk

[@nicholasmcdede8893]

I was kinda going for Steam version on the deck, but I've heard like it forces you to have an Epic Games account to launch. On second thought, I'll go for the switch

[@Robotoda2000]

Is depth of field cpu intensive?

[@amy-295]

Is it handheld or dock

[@DakotaJonesMusic]

It's definitely serviceable for Switch. I do genuinely appreciate they were able to get it to run 60fps.

[@lilbin378]

Playing on the much smaller screen in handheld mode on the switch, the lower quality graphics really aren’t as noticeable as you think

[@yellowgamers5996]

I'ma get this game on the Switch cause 1, I don't have a PS5, and 2 I think I think playing it on Nintendo console is better.

[@Arroyoshi]

Looks better on the switch 😍

[@bacanagamescraft6728]

sonic superstars in switch is nostalgic, this look 2010

[@VenomHEDGEHOG]

As long as people remember that graphics doesn't matter too much, i don't mind these comparisons

[@pranavc.d9268]

The music reminds me of Sonic 4 fsr

[@Bluhm0702]

Dude I always thought all those memes comparing graphics from other consoles vs. Switch were an exaggeration

[@californicationuk]

watching on my iPhone mini. i don't see the difference. is ps5 ver running 120hz?

[@ahmedhasan4966]

Both switch and ps5 is 60fps.

[@stuckintheinbetween]

It took the Balan Wonderworld developer, Arzest, to finally get 2D Sonic right again. It may not be perfect, however it's on the right track.

[@DZ-wl2cv]

I own a Switch and a PS5. Which system should I buy this on?

[@itsumokaneshi]

whats the fps for the switch

[@timothymann485]

Looks decent. Only weird thing is the Switch version looks less contrasty? Could have easily done something about that.

[@nuclearbeeberman]

do we know the engine they use? because a game like this should run in 1080 and 60fps on switch...

[@brentwells6802]

This game is perfect for the switch so I’m getting it on switch! Playing this on the go is amazing

[@ravisdeli5935]

Why is the background blurry on PS5? Honestly think I prefer the switch version because of that

[@SkemeKOS]

Im glad to know it looks a lot better on my PS5. Big screen, high def gaming ftw!

[@BlueAizu_]

It obviously looks nicer on the PS5, but the Switch version looking largely similar and still running at 60 FPS is good to see!

[@gerhard-4123]

🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂