Sony 16-35mm F2.8 GM II | Don't Waste Your Money!

Pre-Order: bhpho.to/3qLYY1e (BH)
This video is brought to you by SQUARESPACE! Visit squarespace.com/jasonvong to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.
Follow Me on Tik Tok, Twitter, IG @jasonvmedia
Video Editor: Jonathan Brinton
www.metfieldfilms.co.uk/ | / jjbrinton
KZbin Gear (Links to Amazon)
► Main Cam: geni.us/D05j
► Main Lens: geni.us/CaIwMY
► Mic: geni.us/ScF5
► Mixer: geni.us/ql4OstD
► FULL LIST: geni.us/aQ7rO
Music from Artlist.io | Get 2 EXTRA Month Free 👇
geni.us/04BA5R
00:00 INTRO
00:08 Image Quality
01:02 Other UltraWide Angle Lenses You Should Consider
03:01 Which I would Buy Instead?
04:00 Why You Should Get the GM II
05:58 Honest Talk...
06:33 Price & Would I Recommend it?
07:12 Squarespace
08:02 In joke, you will not get

[@JasonVong]

Pre-Order 16-35GM II: BH bhpho.to/3qLYY1e 14GM F/1.8 BH geni.us/YfDr7 | Amazon geni.us/F51Gcc Tamron 17-28 BH geni.us/NWssB | Amazon geni.us/hhKPtoU Sigma 16-28 BH bhpho.to/45yKH76 | Amazon geni.us/gSLTHk Tamron 20-40mm BH bhpho.to/44BGVbR | Amazon geni.us/5X8WvW

[@Al3ksdu]

Jason you are by far my favorite reviewer. Your fun antics keep me hooked

[@YTP-jp9lj]

Love your videos Jason... so much more entertaining than other reviews!! Thank you for your time and effort!!!

[@quinterojavier]

Great job with your last videos, Jason. Pure fun and superb editing!!!

[@twoempty]

Love this new format you are using Jason, still the bomb for solid info, but also so entertaining. Keep it up Jason & Vivian. Peace.

[@bttunur]

This probably has been the most fun review I have watched 🔥🔥🔥

[@YellowProductions]

Thanks Jason. And I love this light hearted hosted silly show review format

[@Hobbies4Hire]

Great job on the video Jason! Thanks for making it.

[@SiddharthaJoshiFilms]

Such a fun video to watch Jason! :)

[@JonGarcia1990]

LOL I LOVE THE LITTLE G MINOR CHORD YOU TOSSED INTO THE AUDIO MIX.

[@daveassender1099]

Great video! I use the 16-35 f4 G for 80% of shots for this range. It's so small and light and cheaper, but plenty sharp. If I need something faster, I'll whip out a tiny prime, but I rarely do.

[@72jesvil]

Dude!! Excellent video. Very informative

[@PaulFeinberg]

Great video as always! Loved the green screen over b-roll. I might have to try it sometime. Yes I really want this lens, but my Tamron 17-28 works for now

[@Sqeezy3]

Great video, but I believe, that the 16-35 Z4 PZ deserved a place in the video. Lighter, cheaper, better for gimbal, parafocal, awesome sharpness, even though that lens can't exist without optical corrections.

[@JasonVong]

very true. I ultimately decided to just talk about F/2.8 or faster as I believe more people who are choosing lenses are looking into similar apertures

[@hallease]

I was coming to the comments to see if anyone was going to mention the 16-35mm f4 PZ.

[@Perrylayne105]

I just picked up the f4. Tough choice but better for my needs in video. Sony crushes lowlight so the f4 is 🤷🏼‍♂️

[@kevinkillsit]

GREAT REVIEW! Super fun. Serious game show vibes. I enjoyed this one.

[@hikertrashfilms]

Swapped 16-35GM for 20G, the only glass that I want for A1 is 24 F1.2 & 85 F1.2. 24mm F1.2 can be made at the size and weight of the original 16-35GM and that is the glass to wait for

[@theFATEfactory]

LOVE how light this is compared to my version 1!!!! Definitely noticeable throughout a wedding day 😅 My copy’s zoom barrel is extremely easy to twist especially from 35 towards 16. Just picking it up to shoot after each time I put it down/holding the lens turns the barrel. My version 1 copy was nice and didn’t easily turn so I didn’t have to worry about it not staying in the right focal length during the event. Do you notice the zoom barrel being like this or should I exchange my copy? 🙌🏽🤔🥲

[@nariza7]

When you mentioned you were hoping for a 16mm F2.8 prime with a size like the sigma 17mm f4, thats exactly what I was thinking yesterday when looking up what to pair to the new a7c(ii/R) cameras. I kept watching reviews and was considering the 17mm f4 for its size despite the slow aperture. Im still going to hold out for something different though.The canon rf 16mm f2.8 pancake is pretty much the form factor that I want, but for sony cameras.

[@donotreply2339]

Solid presentation

[@RonderickHenry]

Thanks for this review by offering alternative lenses. Very informative and fun as always.

[@JonnyWhitlam]

You do such a good job, Jason. Thank you for this and your other videos, too.

[@mikaelnilsson5912]

Great video!

[@BrianVisualss]

Great video tbh ❤. Hey Jason, would mind do setup guide for photography and videography on Sony zv-e10 . I've just ordered mine, and i think it will be great seeing a guide from you. ✌🏻

[@maruwaanmoses]

I just got the Tamron 20-40mm f/2.8 today and love it so far! Now I have some extra cash to book a month long holiday to Thailand and Bali!

[@JasonVong]

enjoy! its gonna be a good lens for travel!

[@snapjacksonphotography]

Great video! For wide these days I’m LOVING my Viltrox 16mm 1.8.

[@sweatyemmy]

i seldom comment on a channel but im loving this video, let alone how informative the content is, its also really funny and love the vibes u got in there which kept me watching!! keep it up 👍

[@patrickgilmour1221]

hmm now I'm wondering if I should even get a 24 to 70 if I can get 24-50 or so on this using crop mode. seems like a best of both worlds situation.

[@KwanFung]

love the presentation, i don't even have a sony camera and i'm enjoying this video!

[@blec.g7522]

What gimbal you recommended for Sony ZV E1 with this lenses

[@Backinmywhey]

I need an updated Sony full frame buying guide. Im getting my first camera and it’s going to be full frame because I enjoy night time street photography. And the old one is 4 years old and so many new cameras and updated pricing. Would really appreciate your take on it updated.

[@johandahlkvist53]

KING!

[@methodman348]

I’ve got the GM. Is it better to trade in and get this GM II?

[@yannguerin3164]

UUUUGH I thought I was the only one manifesting a 16mm G 2.8 lens ! Glad to know you are as well!!

[@KillerTacos54]

Fantastic video

[@faba6753]

I just bought this 2 days ago ... and was having some buyers remorse $$$ creep up on me today so I just came here for the reassurance I did the right thing.... thanks JV!

[@ChristopherMarshburn]

Glad you have good reflexes for that lens toss lol.

[@osmankerimben2149]

Thnks for this video 👍🏼 do you have also een video of the Tamron 20-40 2.8 🙏🏼❤️

[@nzhu2764]

Thanks Jason for the nice review. I owned both the 16-35mm GM I and the 14mm F1.8 GM. So I would say, I'd rather not upgrade to this lens, although this is definitely an excellent landscape lens.

[@MollyFitzBrown]

A 16mm pancake f2.8 lens is my dream lens!!! Please Sony!!! I’m thinking about the 16-35 pz, I’m sad it f4 but it’s so small and light and not quite GM expensive…

[@bennieferinga9609]

Samyang has a 18mm f2.8, wich is very light. I have it and am very pleased with it.

[@MollyFitzBrown]

@@bennieferinga9609 I tried it on the a7c awhile ago but then I tried the sony 20mm 1.8 and it was so nice I decided to return the 18mm though I loved the size. Might I need to try it again.

[@jer3006]

Good info and now I can explain why this is way too much lens for me. 😁 Thank you.

[@stringgunner69]

Hiu Jason, very creative way to produce such a video. 👌👍✌

[@coyote9448]

Am I alone in wishing sony would update the 28mm f2 lens? I really like that focal length and im hoping for something more exciting for it. Maybe 28mm f1.4 or g series 28mm compact like the 24, 40, 50 trio.

[@AmandaHMei]

The intro is SPOT ON

[@binaryinfections]

My bank has a picture of you saying “don’t watch his videos” because I spend money when you say “get it” lol

[@JasonVong]

🤣

[@iegor9951]

hi Jason, can you please compare it to Sony PZ 16-35 F4 (mostly the sharpness and image quality)? Thanks, your videos are awesome!

[@ponnan1]

quality review video...!.. awesome

[@CeltainianChronicals]

I'll give you that answer... YES! I've just been out for the first time with it and the results are stunning. The best G-Master lens I've used. It has an absolutely beautiful character and is super sharp. They're the main things for me.

[@TundeEszlari]

Very good video.

[@tomariko]

My Tamron 15-30 on my Nikon DLSR was 1500 GR, so I guess this one is a joy to use.

[@beamititik]

hey, I like you work. What would be the best lens from Sony for POV close videos? Kisses.

[@Thiran]

< not a Sony owner, but what about the 20mm 1.8 prime? for vlogging. I do think 16 is too wide.

[@markwildphotography]

Watching this as I was thinking of trading the 20mm and the 35mm GM for it, but I think I’d miss the lowlight capabilities too much as a wedding tog who often shoots daaaark venues in Scotland. Think I’ll just trade the 20mm G for the 14mm GM now though! Thank you Mr. Vong sir 🙌🏼

[@jaycee320]

The Vong has spoken ❤❤❤2.8 wide angle expensive tho

[@KT-dji]

Great review! In July I bought bought 16-35GM and now version 2 is come out😢. So question is 16-35GM to 16-35GM II? Because smaller, lighter and other new things? Or just keep using 16-35GM?

[@JamieFenn]

Love your videos Gene XD hahahahah

[@JasonVong]

🤣🤣🤣

[@davidligon6088]

I have the GM I and use it mostly for landscape. Can’t figure out why I should upgrade unless there is a “yuge” difference in sharpness.

[@nicotri9722]

There is a noticeable difference in sharpness at the corners and better clarity overall. Plus, it is lighter and more compact than its predecessor.

[@hikertrashfilms]

Only reason to upgrade is if you have the A1 or plan on getting the A9iii. This glass was made for those stacked bodies

[@jasonlau8944]

6:19 a super risky throw 🤣

[@Vansh_Bajpai]

Please someone recommend me😭 which lens should i buy as my first lens a6700 for travel vlogging cinematography and some portraits plss...there are so much option and i am literally confused

[@visionarywatts]

lmaoo @ G minor 😂 I'm watching since I'm deciding between the I and the II

[@KionPiano]

Thinking about doing Stand up comedy Jason ?

[@jonnyelpoiss7]

Variable nd filter. That's why you would get this over some other wide angle lenses here. I sold my sigma 14-24 dg dn for the first version of the 16-35 f2.8 and I never looked back because of that very reason. For landscape and outdoor architecture, when the sun is strong, with that 3d pop quality and contrast from the gm, nothing come close to it.

[@hikertrashfilms]

I sold the 16-35GM because Primes are wayyy sharper and my 20G / 50GM dual setup on a1 & A7R4a makes me not miss the 16-35GM ever, or even lust for the GMII...I simply need a 24mm F1.2 on Quad XD Motors to allow the A1 to properly flex at 24mm like the 50GM was designed to do.

[@ayhancapan]

16-50mm Kit lens is more than good enough for me :)

[@raycampos7597]

I've never seen you before, you are sooo funny. You should be doing stand up!!

[@artofdao]

How about the new Sony 16-25mm f2.8 G??? With the 24-50mm combo

[@wakeywarrior]

This guy is good, also with some good humour- even if he doesn’t have 256g V90 cards 😄 Great channel well done. Yes a small ultra wide is needed.

[@JasonVong]

if you were to generously Super Thank me $800, I can get two right now😏

[@wakeywarrior]

@@JasonVong I only have 128gb cards as well.😂

[@MaunoKoivistoOfficial]

This is the perfect lens review to watch while drunk

[@rickt.8866]

I love my 14mm 1.8 GM! I use sensor ND filters which is the only downfall of using it. I’m also using the Tamron 11-20 f/2.8 for my A7IV 60p 1.5 crop which works amazingly well.

[@hikertrashfilms]

Exactly. There is a pristine 14GM that has been sitting at my camera shop for $1,000 since May. If that glass could accept a front normal screw-in Cir-PL filter or UV filter, then it would of been gone instantly. The fact it just sits there when so many photographers have seen it, is very telling

[@michaelfrymus]

I don't like how the lens extends when you're zoomed out. Id rather have it all be internally. Less issues with dust getting in, and it's also backwards, which is weird

[@undeathshadow]

Would you recommend this for casual astro?

[@JasonVong]

yes def possible for casual astro!

[@undeathshadow]

@@JasonVong thanks! as always

[@vicluistudio3320]

I have kinda a off topic question if you don't mind. I have been hunting for an accurate answer... I just bought a used pz 16-50mm. I realise that the image always shake when zoom in and out, at a few certain focal lengthes. Also, I can’t change the speed of zooming by changing the zooming speed number at manual. Can't change the ring function into manual zoom too. Is this normal to this model, or my lens have problem? This is my zooming test: kzbin.info/www/bejne/lWrYnGd_qdmApsk The local sony stores don't have a display of this lens so I can't test it. Thanks

[@MarkusGebhard]

Can you please test the new Viltrox 16mm f/1.8 for us? Other reviews I've seen so far say that it plays in the same league as the 14mm GM from Sony. But it cost only $549. Hey sharp, almost zero distortion, very minimal CA, Coma, etc. And it accepts front filters 😀 Would love to hear your feedback on it.

[@nyohaku]

I have two nice sharp Viltrox lenses less than two months old- but one stopped working already. Viltrox is not honoring their 1-year warranty. Just sayin’

[@hikertrashfilms]

Chinese CCP junk

[@ekkawinify]

I wish sigma or tamron have their small 16-35 2.8 version as well maybe not as perfect but cheaper

[@GaryJahman]

I just received the Sigma 16-28mm and it’s a lightweight package and so much cheaper than the G master

[@hikertrashfilms]

As long as you don’t have a stacked body, that’s fine...but a stacked body will be crippled by that glass, and my A1 would be crippled by the crappy motors on that glass. The motors on this 16-35GMII make this glass unbeatable till 2029 unless Sigma or Tamron does a 17-28 F2 bazooka

[@lukelim5094]

Did you just throw a few thousand buck lens in the air and catch it. Shudders in panic. Hahaha. Drop test time.

[@rozentals_photography28]

I buy it 16-35 gm ii and can say it's a terribly good lens i don't want use anymore 24-70 just selling it because 16-35 gm ii give me everything what i need ! I use before 14mm as well yes it is fantastic lens but i don't want walk around with many lenses that's why i sell it but this 16-35 cover all my needs and really i don't need anymore 14mm but really i recommend it that is fantastic lens

[@wiktoriabosc8271]

Dear Jason, thank You so much for all your amazing tutorials! They are a MUST for me! I have a question concerning the ISO sensitivity. Very often I work with people on a scene - where I have spot lighting (from the ceiling, which as you can imagine isn't very flattering). I am doing my best to make them look as good as i can ;-). Often I work with my Sony Alpha 7rIII and I would like to know what in you opinion is the highest ISO I can go to without loosing the quality of the image. I am always afraid to go higher than a 1250 . Thank You for Your reply in advance! All the best and keep on inspiring all of us! 🙂

[@intaketherapy]

16-35 f4 PZ > 16-35 f2.8, not worth the $ for f2.8 at this focal range

[@hikertrashfilms]

Spoken like a snowflake who has never hiked 1,000 miles with the 16-35GM or understand F2.8 vs F4. It’s not worth the money for vLoggers, but for “Photographers” who want the versatility of a zoom...it’s worth every penny and more in terms of how much value it will bring to you over the next decade

[@brutedawg]

tell me you werent nervous tossing up all that glass 😅

[@kapilesh14]

Jason is the greatest Sony ambassador!

[@demojoys]

HAHAHA holy S, 30 seconds in and this is the best reviewer i've seen.

[@auroraflash]

Hi Brit Shooters 🇬🇧

[@riparianlife97701]

Wow. Your audio was all over with that mic.

[@User-pq2yn]

What about image stabilization?

[@stew8584]

3,565.55 Australian Dollars, maybe the f4 version, Cheers.

[@HesDeadJim]

This is the absolute perfect balance of cringe. Really funny and educational ;)

[@kaimelis]

Viltrox 16mm f1.8. Just reminding of its existence.

[@daveemilio67]

"Don't waste your money" --- "It's worth it" :)

[@cedricphoo]

Video work cashing kid from day to night, Sony 1635gm2 or Sony 1635g? 🙏🏻

[@hikertrashfilms]

2023 Mercedes or 2017 Mercedes...

[@demancey]

When the lens is as much as the camera. Merciful deity!

[@andreas.2]

Somehow all my lenses were more expensive than my camera body...

[@Jabber-ig3iw]

Glass is more important than the camera. Cameras come and go, good glass is forever.

[@dashinarnie]

Happy with Tamron 20-40 mm. Can’t beat the price performance aspect

[@MrRaychard123]

Viltrox 16mm 1.8 E mount is a better buy for sub $600

[@andreas.2]

Great lens but i already have 14 mm GM...

[@noof2533]

I found the 14 GM to be way to soft at the corners and ended up cropping in, while I liked the sharpness stopped down I found my 24GM was better after considering the crop, sold I sold the 14

[@Pharesm]

A wide angle zoom, I'd only buy it with power zoom... Without, I'd just get a prime.

[@hikertrashfilms]

They have that option... it’s $5,000

[@marcusransom9334]

Soooo your waiting for a Sony 16mm 1.8 and yet photographer's are blowing up FB groups over the Viltrox 16mm F1.8 AF FE Full Frame lens?... Which is of course my favorite. I know, I know it's not a familiar brand to the "pros" so it's not getting the respect it deserves. However the Viltrox is rapidly becoming VERY popular nonetheless. You should try it.

[@soamjena]

Useless upgrade. They should have atleast added OSS to this lens.

[@Jabber-ig3iw]

Eh? WtF do you need OSS for on a 16-35😂😂😂😂😂😂 do you have Parkinson’s?

[@Sysopx86]

no love for the sigma 14-24mm 2.8 ☹

[@bennieferinga9609]

That's known to be a very good lens. But Sigma has a tendency to make very heavy lenses...

[@movakalin5333]

I enjoyed the video more than actually the lens itself. this lens is too big and heavy. not to mention the hefty price.

[@d30gaijin]

Nope, I'll stick with my APS-C L mount camera and the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8, all for a lot less moolah.

[@fwiler]

Big difference between 16mm and 27mm equiv. Same with DOF.

[@d30gaijin]

@@fwiler That's nice.

[@dwightlooi]

Why do you EVER need a wide aperture ultra wide zoom when anything more than a foot or two away is infinity on a 16mm anyway? The apeture is largely irrelevant. I'll rather have a 16-35/F4 any day for the smaller size and weight. 90% of the shots I'll use it for will be indoor architecture or ultra wide scenery shots. These will be shot at infinity everything will be in focus whether the aperture is F2.8 or F16. The remaining 10% will be selfie blogging nonsense, in which case I'll prefer a smaller lens I can balance on a smaller gimball.

[@1970rsc]

You can do some creative things with it. Think low light street photography, and some really interesting/creative portraits. When you have a lot going on in a scene with stuff in fore/mid/background, it’s nice to have the f2.8 to kind of focus the viewers eye on your subject. I have the sigma 16-28.

[@broadwayphotovideo]

Sharpness sweet spot comes near f/4-4.5 for 2.8 but f/5.6-6.3 for 4. Shooting low-light theater or other low-light scenes is when you’d want that little extra light. Worth $1000 more? Hell no

[@duvalpenny100]

Lowlight when your subject isn't static. Also, for those close up shots that you refered to. I think fast wide angle zooms make more sense than fast long zooms. DoF at 200mm is still ridiculously thin at F4, and you probably won't find yourself indoors needing a fast 70-200mm very often.

[@dwightlooi]

@@duvalpenny100LOL... I don't shoot portraits or animals by sneaking up to a few inches from them in the dark! That's how you get shot! If it is a street scene, it's actually BETTER that the people and cars are blurry streaks whilst building and light are sharp.

[@duvalpenny100]

@@dwightlooi that is certainly a subjective opinion.

[@TuanAnhNguyen-gb3wz]

Don’t buy these lens