Sony 24-105 www.bhphotovid... Tamron 28-75 www.bhphotovid...
Пікірлер: 66
@TheSleve222 жыл бұрын
I love the 24-105. I have bad eyes so the image stabilization helps. Also i prefer the range of 24 and 75-105. Planning on getting a fast prime next.
@barongreenbackthe2nd4183 жыл бұрын
Got the Sony and it’s brilliant.
@coreytomsrealtor30724 жыл бұрын
Surprised there aren't more vids on this. Thank you! I agree with tamron being a tiny bit sharper in the middle and sony on edges. I like the colors of sony better though. I hate that magenta hue almost anytime.
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Corey Toms Realtor Glad it helped! The Sony’s colors are more true to life. It’s a great lens. Outside of the F4 vs 2.8 differences, I’d rate the Sony as the better lens in terms of overall performance.
@igoryudnikov61982 жыл бұрын
do you know what calibration is?
@AryNeto15 жыл бұрын
Best video on the subject so far! And I’ve seen many.. thanks 🙏🏽
@craigcamera24575 жыл бұрын
Happy it helped! 👍
@DrWasim4 жыл бұрын
This was EXACTLY the video I was searching for. Thank you so much! I’ll be going for the Sony 🙂
@supernoona894 жыл бұрын
“Just pick the one you’ll use more” GOOD POINT!☝🏻 Thank you^^
@jabezhane3 жыл бұрын
Never got the love for 28-70(ish) range lenses. When I got hold of one it was "Okay...nice wide shot, not bad" and then zoomed out to the far end and then looked at what my eye saw and it was "Oh that gives me normal eyesight for zoom range!" Wow. I'd rather just take a 24/28mm prime and the good old 85mm prime. I swapped the 24-70 for a 24-105 F4. As for low light with the 2.8? Well now your cameras can go to ISO 8000+ okay...is that a bit old world thinking?
@roccofalzone93693 жыл бұрын
I’m really torn here. Currently own the Tamron but I think I would benefit from the IS in the lens because my addiction to coffee. It’s hit or miss from me on the Tamron with portraits, landscape is always a win. F stop is no biggie with the way these cameras perform in low light now, however, it’s the fight between the extra focal length as a daily driver and the macro capabilities on the Tamron
@nerdyandy31013 жыл бұрын
Very up to the point as a lot of people must have the same questioning, and at least I do. I guess most essential points have been mentioned and thanks for that. I was using a Canon 24-105mm for years but the quality was inferior to the Sony as I hear from users and I miss the range. I may want to carry a faster portrait lens along but I guess I'm going to try the 24-105 & sell my Tamron (which has served me faithfully though! Thanks again
@NickL0VIN4 жыл бұрын
I loved your review! I went with the tamron as well, I enjoy night time street photography so f/2.8 is a must.
@igoryudnikov61982 жыл бұрын
Tamron is an APS-C lens, and APS-C mode has worst ISO performance, on both APS-C camera and FF camera in APS-C mode. Then low light performance of this lenses is near equal, but APS-C shots would have ISO 6400 and FF ones would have 12800 with near the same amount of noise.
@NickL0VIN2 жыл бұрын
@@igoryudnikov6198 The tamron 28-75mm is a Full frame lens.
@chamodmalalathunga69204 жыл бұрын
24-105mm & 50mm would be great combination
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Fast 50mm or 35mm would be a good compliment.
@lduplago4 жыл бұрын
Great video. I agree it's the best on this subject I have been able to find. Appreciate it.
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Thanks Lou! Useful/helpful vids are the goal.
@adrianalfordphotography4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comparison review Craig. Found it really helpful.
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped you out Adrian. That was the goal. Thanks.
@sabs14234 жыл бұрын
Best review video I've seen on this topic. Thanks!
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped! Thanks
@dannelcj4 жыл бұрын
Very good video Craig. Great start! Keep them coming. :)
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks Dan! Will do. 👋
@viktorhogberg90703 жыл бұрын
Which one do you reckon would fit best with a Sony A7R III? It has 42 MP so it might compensate for the 75mm on the Tamron? Being able to still crop a lot in to get a telephoto effect. But at the same time is that one sharp enough?
@cyberden4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Just what I needed!
@Tricklarock Жыл бұрын
Dood, nice review! People are asking why you don't make more, you must play in that band, and have zero time to make more huh? What's the band name/info to check out?
@debaratihalder29174 жыл бұрын
Awww ... Your voice and looks .. 😍😍 ..
@shangw66183 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks!
@jonscon46043 жыл бұрын
Why didn´t you make more videos? This one is amazing!
@HectorRiveraPhotography3 жыл бұрын
Tammy for me !! I have all primes G masters :)
@DoUNoHarm4 жыл бұрын
I choose the Tamron too. The extra range isn't much valuable to me.
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Sounds like the right choice based of your preferences 👍
@jeremias.lindner4 жыл бұрын
tamron for the win
@ShadowManTV4 жыл бұрын
Respect!
@chamodmalalathunga69204 жыл бұрын
Great video 👍
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@kesavank72 жыл бұрын
Sigma 24-70 vs tamron 28-75 which best
@ShervinKoushan4 жыл бұрын
Great video! You should have way more than 28 subs. Well it's 29 now haha. I am wondering if I should sell my 24-105 and get the Tamron instead. Is it holding up well?
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Mine is holding up great, especially considering how much use it gets. You will notice it feels bit "cheaper" than the Sony in the hand, but it's also lighter. They're both great lenses. I'm happy with the Tamron for my uses, but the Sony has its clear advantages as well (range, lens stabilization etc.) Depends on the work you're doing.
@ShervinKoushan4 жыл бұрын
@@craigcamera2457 Thanks for the info! This is the hardest choice ever haha
@autumn72833 жыл бұрын
I have got 24-105 G. My intention is like your opinion but I have a lot of prime lens e.g. 24 35 50 including 70-200 f2.8. So I keep 24-105 for travelling in daylight because the picture edge is contrast and sharp, and use it with other prime lens in the low light situation.
@NNA19842 жыл бұрын
When a lens at 2.8 is as sharp as another at 4.0, you know the first one is good.
@BillCipher1337 Жыл бұрын
the tes pics where at same f-stop.
@gadgetphilosophy82904 жыл бұрын
Good review man. No bullshit.
@seken2nun4 жыл бұрын
Good stuff 👍🏾
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Teddy Tedd 🙌
@petvesta3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your down-to-earth review. I am getting the a7iii and considering the 24-105 lens. I have heard IBIS cannot be used with the OSS for more steady video. Is that true?
@cpr10873 жыл бұрын
It will use 3 axes from the lens and 2 from the camera, but the difference between this and only OSS is not visible
@Tricklarock Жыл бұрын
@@cpr1087 So does this render the Tamron equal to the Sony in terms of shakiness??? I'll be using whichever on the a7iv. Thanks!
@user-jh8hb9ex1j4 жыл бұрын
You nice bro !
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Thank You 🙏
@chamodmalalathunga69204 жыл бұрын
Have you experienced any focusing issue with the Tamron?
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Nope. It's on par with my Sony lenses in that category.
@thatsreallyamoon3 жыл бұрын
@@craigcamera2457 I've seen some videos of people testing the tracking, and the Tamron loses the person every so often. I think if autofocus is a priority for video, one is always stuck with first party; Sony. :( Probably doesn't matter for photos as much.
@cerberus_uwu2 жыл бұрын
A comparison with different apertures and shutter speeds! LOL!..
@cypher33234 жыл бұрын
man you're beautiful
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Emam Araf Thanks Bro 🕺🤘
@Director4144 жыл бұрын
is the auto focus the same in both lenses?
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
I didn't notice a discernible difference in autofocus between the two. They both seemed about the same.
@gurudeclan4 жыл бұрын
You look like Jason Donovan if he never discovered drugs.
@craigcamera24574 жыл бұрын
Jason Donovan life minus the massive drug problem. I think I could handle that life. haha