I actually like how the OSS works. It gives it a natural hand held look without it looking artificially stabilized . Great video as always!
@Zowarma5 жыл бұрын
I have the Sony A6300 and I was torn between Sony 35mm 1.8 and Sigma 30 1.4. I went with the Sony 35mm 1.8 after watching this video. I do 70% videowork and 30% Photography. OSS is really a must for the lack of IBIS on my A6300. Thanks mate!
@LukusMaxamus5 жыл бұрын
This is such an underrated channel, the video quality is insane!
@knucklesandwich61174 жыл бұрын
I still love the Sony 35mm 1.8 OSS for general purpose, portrait and video. I find it is soft wide open 1.8-2.2F stop, but I have no problem with adjusting to 2.8 in darker situations. I have the Sigma 16mm 1.4 for landscape and concerts, Sony 35mm 1.8 OSS, and the Sony 70-350mm G OSS for sports and wildlife..That trio is all I ever need for as long as the A6100 holds up...With more precision and taking your time, I really can get close to Full Frame results with Sony’s excellent APS-C sensors
@roman222k5 жыл бұрын
I own a6300 and 35mm became my kit lens since I bought it. Haven't put 16-50mm back for a while. Such a great lens for its price.
@geopapa805 жыл бұрын
Nice review! A review of the very well regarded (and cheaper) Sigma 30mm 1.4 dc dn lens would be a very welcome addition for comparison.
@tomasrandom64305 жыл бұрын
yes, please
@TedEhioghae4 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know what that black thing covering the camera is and its use? 2:40
@geopapa804 жыл бұрын
@@TedEhioghae en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_hood. It serves 2 purposes. Creates a shade to prevent flaring from light sources and protects the front of the lens
@JhaveriAakash5 жыл бұрын
Your videos are so relaxing
@philg67575 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting for the meditation channel.
@TedEhioghae4 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know what that black thing covering the camera is and its use? 2:40
@yueh044 жыл бұрын
@@TedEhioghae The lens hood in front of the lens ?
@TedEhioghae4 жыл бұрын
@@yueh04 Thank you.
@socratesvela82855 жыл бұрын
This is a special lens. If I had to go with one lens, this would be it on my a6000. it is fast enough and not too telephoto and not too wide, just right.
@steven28095 жыл бұрын
Socrates Vela If by special you mean rubbish...then I agree. Sony need to do better than this!
@socratesvela82855 жыл бұрын
@@steven2809 I bought this for low light and it does great for stills and video. Sony is doing great but for their gmaster lenses. Maybe they will clean up a bit for apsc.
@caldera8785 жыл бұрын
It's right because this lens on a crop sensor camera would work out to be around 50mm equlivent FOV on a Full Frame sensor so it's what about the human eye would normally see.
@steven28095 жыл бұрын
Aperture This ‘fact’ about 50mm FOV being what we see is just wrong. Manufacturers sold a 50mm with cameras as a ‘compromise’ focal length. Not too wide, not too narrow. Try this. Sit in your lounge and look at the room. Now look through a 50mm FOV lens. You can’t get half the room in! It’s too narrow. 35mm FOV is MUCH closer to what we actually see....
@denislan18295 жыл бұрын
but a sigma 30 f1.4 instead.
@jaredalbin56585 ай бұрын
The sharpness comparison at different fstops was very helpful.
@void9116 ай бұрын
i personally think the OSS is a huge difference when recording video handheld , those crazy stutters are gone which really bothers me
@JetBen5555 жыл бұрын
2:34 you say the AF is slow but that transition was beautiful and very smooth
@tuanraven1315 жыл бұрын
Technically it's not to compare with modern lenses. Sony successful with E-mount when they first introduced this lens.
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
It's very nice and smooth...but it's still slow.
@Pockymuncher8885 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfrost Did you try turning up your AF speed in the a6300 menus? By default it's on the medium speed setting.
@caldera8785 жыл бұрын
AF drive speed is probably on slow.
@leomiles86585 жыл бұрын
"It's me" - Christopher Frost
@Zunidrap3 жыл бұрын
Excellent reviews, thanks. Far better than anything else on youtube.
@FitofnietOfficial4 жыл бұрын
I can tell from my own experience that the 35mm 1.8 is a must have for videography! Using the lens every time in my new projects.
@aceofspades0996 Жыл бұрын
Do you use aps c or full frame?
@DaCoolDawgs4 жыл бұрын
just discovered your channel today. professional, concise, super informative, and so pleasant to watch!!
@tuanraven1315 жыл бұрын
This lens was first introduced since the NEX era for the lower resolution sensors, its optical quality should be forgivable. Sony did not really have some masterpieces then nor in the previous generation.
@TJuice19864 жыл бұрын
You should give each lens a 0-10 rating in each category. Then at the end, you should add them all up for a final score. This point system will really allow us to compare each lens when we can’t figure out which one to buy.
@tombekistan5 жыл бұрын
The Bob Ross of KZbin photo+video movies !
@Badonicus5 жыл бұрын
Great Vid as always. The DetroitBorg of camera lens reviews.
@dangernba5 жыл бұрын
Your reviews are great, man! Greetings from Brazil.
@illuminatiZ2 жыл бұрын
wow, great test, great finding about image quality at f1.4 and f1;8 , i wanted to use this lens to shoot in the dark but i am going to think about it
@demonhogo Жыл бұрын
i would love to see the vignette on full frame. The zv-e1 begs for lenses like this
@arkaprabhodas94805 жыл бұрын
Love your unbiased reviews.. Please make a review of Tamron 70-210 mm f4 lens. Eagerly waiting for it.
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
I'm currently testing that very lens :-)
@arkaprabhodas94805 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfrost Wow... great. As the Canon version is out of my budget, that's why I have chosen the Tamron one. Really waiting for your opinion...
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
It's fantastic - just about as good. The build quality of the Canon lens is a bit nicer, though
@zolwikwkurwik3 жыл бұрын
Wow thanx for this video. Almost bought this thing.
@parryhotter34563 жыл бұрын
Lens looks decentered.. I was quite upset about my first copy of this lens but my second copy blew me away.. corner is much sharper even at 1.8
@KalebShield Жыл бұрын
Wait so are you telling me you got a bad copy of your first 35 mm 1.8 oss and then you got a new one that ended up being better ? I’m in the same boat right now so please get back to me if u see this
@chrislj28905 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see you review the new Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM lens if you still have your EOS M3 body.
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
I will certainly cover that lens
@chrislj28905 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfrost Thank you! 😊
@heisenbergvader78235 жыл бұрын
Damn, I want a Sony full frame 35mm F1.8 native lens so bad !!!!! My lord Sony, grant me a lens like that and I will pledge my absolute loyalty to your system....
@heisenbergvader78235 жыл бұрын
The F1.4 version is way too heavy, that is why I want a more opical-weight-balanced F1.8 lens. I have Zeiss Loxia 35mm F2, Samyang 35mm F2.8 and Samyang 35mm F1.4. I just love this focal length so much, but I still need a Sony full frame native 35mm F1.8 to put a period for my 35mm collection
@thefullshilling7425 жыл бұрын
You came to the right channel to plead to The Lord.
@AustrianGeek5 жыл бұрын
Sadly only usable at F2.8 or F4.0 (used it test wise on an A6400 for a few days - but I had to send it back). Lets be honest: Why should you go for an F1.8 lens which is only really goot at F4 - And not THAT super cheap too (the performance would match half of the asking-price WAY better ^^). Sure - It delivers great sharpness at higher aperture values (F4 and above). But that was not the purpose I bought it for ^^. Sadly its one of the few OSS / optical stabilised lenses for the new A6400 body from Sony (which is not coming with an body internal stabiliser). Come on Sony - Release some new APS-C lenses (especially a good 16-55 F2.8 or so is DESPERATELY needed - I like the 18-105mm F4 - But would LOVE to have an constant F2.8 aperture APS-C zoom lens) (!)
@adischenker1851 Жыл бұрын
how is focus breathing with it?
@jamesconraadtucker Жыл бұрын
I really appreciate your review of the Sony 35mm 1.8 OSS lens. Very insightful! I hope your work doesn't keep you from continued reviews. The macro anomalies you mentioned might have me looking for another lens, though this will still have some other practicality to it. I'd be using it for photography, though, on a A6600. Great job!
@vibesforanytime Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this informative video!!
@gersonmadrid66755 жыл бұрын
After seeing your review, I decided NOT TO buy it, thank you for your honest review. And I am sorry to hear that your full time job it's getting so busy. I really enjoy your reviews, but hey, you need food at your table. Thank you again Christopher. Update*** I bought it used at $260 on Ebay. I think it's impossible to get it at $200
@dragonfist255 жыл бұрын
Gerson Madrid Same. I’ve been eyeing this lens for months but after this review I’ll pass. Plus it’s $100 overpriced.
@mariospavlou84215 жыл бұрын
but you said you will not buy it lol
@IRFAN-po5sz4 жыл бұрын
So how is your experience regarding this lens? can you please share it?
@HappyHubris4 жыл бұрын
@@IRFAN-po5sz I really like this lens for my purposes. It's a bit of a mess sometimes wide open (a lot of color fringing with up-close/backlit subjects at F1.8) but is otherwise a nicely sharp and stabilized lens. I like how compact it is in the hand (perfect with an A6400) and how the stabilization lets me take indoor and night shots that I otherwise could not pull off. Some personal examples: flic.kr/p/2hj196H flic.kr/p/2h2S5oY (this one is cropped about 50% and still looks good) flic.kr/p/2g9zgPK The Sigma 30 F1.4 is supposed to be sharper at the expense of weight and stabilization. If I used an A6600 I might be tempted to switch, but the humble 35mm is good enough in a very small package.
@TedEhioghae4 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know what that black thing covering the camera is and its use? 2:40
@PapikenCS5 жыл бұрын
Hey, nice review! I've been watching your review of this Sony SEL35F18 and the Samyang AF 35mm F2.8 FE as I was trying to decide to buy either of these two lenses for my a6000. Now I've decided to buy the Samyang FE lens.
@PapikenCS5 жыл бұрын
I don't put the Sigma 30mm F1.4 into consideration due to its higher price point in my country. It's about 410 USD, whereas the Sony and Samyang lenses are 285 and 320 respectively.
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
This lens have image stabilization. The Samyang lens has full-frame compatibility and is smaller
@PapikenCS5 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfrost I don't regard the OSS as useful enough for my use. So I'm glad to trade it off for better stills performance. The weight and size advantage of the Samyang are also welcome.
@tuffycampbell3 жыл бұрын
This lens seems to be built for vlogging and close up video work. Thanks for the vid!
@MPD904 ай бұрын
52.5mm equiv focal length - not really a vlogger lens.
@phero69335 жыл бұрын
Have you had a chance to use the Sigma 30mm f1.4? I'd be curious how it would compared to this lens.
@ahmetkonukseven71405 жыл бұрын
@07:13 woow. this is my hometown izmir/Turkey. great view from asansör place. it makes me happy. great shot!
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
Thanks - I had a great time in Izmir. Take a look on my channel at the video about the ancient church in Smyrna if you'd like to see more.
@ahmetkonukseven71405 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfrost Thanks. Definitely I will.. :))
@blurayffan664 жыл бұрын
I've had a mirrorless camera for a few years now and have finally decided to get some additional lenses. The camera came with the mediocre 16-50mm but I have just purchased the 50mm OSS F1.8...I'm now wondering if the 35mm is a better choice- it is about 180 quid more expensive....so either I keep the 16-50 for lanscapes/wide and the 50mm for street + portraits or ditch them both and get the 35mm all rounder and then just have to carry around 1 lens...(the 16-50 is tiny tho so no probs carrying that and the 50 with me)... thoughts?
@christopherfrost4 жыл бұрын
If you must have only one lens then probably best to make it a zoom lens for flexibility
@k.o.t.o.n.2 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfrost HY. IS IT MADE FOR APS-C OR FF FOR THE FIRST PLACE?
@chryseass.51435 жыл бұрын
I have this lens for my a6500 but I find I favour the Sony /Zeiss 24mm f1.8 instead. It is a much nicer lens but sadly no built in stabilization. Of, course, that is not a problem for the a6500 which has stabilization in the camera body.
@socratesvela82855 жыл бұрын
That is a FF equiv of 36mm, which a lot of folks really like that focal length. This 35 is more of a 52mm FF focal length.
@chryseass.51435 жыл бұрын
Yes, that is true, but their is something about the rendering of the the 24 f1.8 that makes it a special lens. It is also fairly compact ( but a smidge bigger than the 35 f1.8).
@chryseass.51435 жыл бұрын
Er, so much 'hate' for Sony, Foto4Max. I actually bought my 24mm 1.8 used for a good price! There are definitely other and cheaper e mount options but feel free to move on!
@socratesvela82855 жыл бұрын
@Foto4Max there is the Rokinon 24 f2.8 $400 or the sigma 24f1.4 $850.
@alex-yd7ju5 жыл бұрын
$850 isn't a good price when canon has a 24mm 2.8 for $129.....
@simonyang795 жыл бұрын
Can u get a chance to review Sony 24-240 oss lens? Seems like not many people reviewed it professionally like u so far. So please!
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
Maybe one day :-)
@lazerman1215 жыл бұрын
Did you pic up another a6300? Man that longitudinal chromatic aberration on the book was so bad it looks cool :D. But man again a disappointing lens IMO. I wonder it Samyang's 35mm F1.2 is any better stopped down to 1.8 to match.
@TJuice19864 жыл бұрын
So glad I bought the sigma 30mm 1.4 instead!
@mortschubert39095 жыл бұрын
Very nice review!
@glabutis4 жыл бұрын
Thank you 😊
@IRFAN-po5sz4 жыл бұрын
Very nice video. can you please recommend me this lens for my sony a6400 or something better recommendation you have in this regard. I have 18-135 as kit lens. THANKS
@TheChurley155 жыл бұрын
Please review the Canon EFM 32mm f1.4!!!!
@champCats5 жыл бұрын
Second this!!!
@gundam08165 жыл бұрын
3rd this!!
@renjieyang3255 жыл бұрын
4th
@TheMetalButcher5 жыл бұрын
A bit disappointing. Right focal length, fast, and has image stabilization. Buttt, stabilization looked pretty poor (I could barely tell you turned it on when normally it goes from a shaky mess to looking almost like it's on a tripod), horrible aberrations (book shot was especially bad), and that high price would lead me elsewhere. With that being said, your photos look real nice especially with the kitty.
@iwanpoe11115 жыл бұрын
After i see this review, I lovely again my sony 35mm lens... Thanks sob...
@felipesl82287 ай бұрын
Is this different from the other 1.8 35mm? It seems smaller than the other one…
@TechOutAdam3 жыл бұрын
I have the Sony A7C, I wonder how well this lens will do especially in giving me more bokeh in my videos.
@ArteUltra11952 жыл бұрын
Oh god who´s going to tell him
@schregen5 жыл бұрын
Wait, you have a full time job? Besides KZbin? I thought you were full time KZbinr 🍄
@kornchalsuwanprateep91255 жыл бұрын
Hi, love your works. Can you do the sigma 30 1.4 too? I have the a6000 thinking about getting one of them. Thank you!!
@familyjoys Жыл бұрын
Nice review sir..just wanna ask..i got my A6500 with ibis on it..does combination ibis and oss lens makes video stabilization even better or just the same with no oss lens?
@foodtravelentertainment4671 Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤❤Good Information Sony Lens 35mm 1.8 Oss ❤❤❤❤
@colmranger5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another great video, I'm slightly surprised with your negative review :)
@silverroos5 жыл бұрын
Hi, nice review. I would like to buy a lens like this one. I’m on budget, would you recommend me this one or is there a better value for about the same price?
@TedEhioghae4 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know what that black thing covering the camera is and its use? 2:40
@reptilespantoso2 жыл бұрын
I have this lens. It's pretty good for video work, because of the OSS. It can be pretty sharp on the usual range of subjects during interviews 1.5-3 mtr.
@KariDotson5 жыл бұрын
I LOVE this lens, I literally made my last 3 videos with this lens! ♥️
@IRFAN-po5sz4 жыл бұрын
Hi do you recommend this lens to me for a6400. How is your experience with it please ?
@xtremeallstar5 жыл бұрын
Hi Chris, I've recently purchased this lens, can you further explain to me how does 2:50 - 4:08 work, i can't seem to interpret it well.
@TheMetalButcher5 жыл бұрын
Not sure what you mean. As the aperture is closed down (made smaller) the image quality improves, up to F/11.
@thriftyfamilytripsdiys29645 жыл бұрын
Hi, can you please review speedbooster from either viltrox or metabones. thanks
@cyrildescoursiere90605 жыл бұрын
What is your full time job ?
@Delilahnina5 жыл бұрын
Can I vlog myself with this camera?? And film makeup tutorials??
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
You mean with this lens? Yes, but it won't be a very wide angle - you might want a 24mm lens or something like that instead
@yarontaub5 жыл бұрын
No more sony reviews? But I was so looking forward for the 70-300mm review :-(
@JamesClark19915 жыл бұрын
Whyyyyyyyyy don't Sony have this lens in a full frame option? 😭😭😭
@JWS19685 жыл бұрын
Wish you'd have turned music down for the AF silence test.
@iCraftDay3 жыл бұрын
I saw another review and this lens is silent. But sigma is loud.
@adamartar28675 жыл бұрын
Thoughts on these 2 lens for the a6000 Sony Alpha E-Mount Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA Lens vs Sony E-Mount 35mm f/1.8 OSS? Would you recommend one over the other?
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
I haven't tested the Zeiss lens but the Sony has image stabilization so it wins my vote there
@concepto4164 жыл бұрын
Are you going to review the FE 35mm 1.8 soon? 😊
@christopherfrost4 жыл бұрын
Yes, I have one heading into my office today actually
@tomasrandom64305 жыл бұрын
you saved my money :)
@Jay-if9dr5 жыл бұрын
Hi Chris, any chance you could test a lens I just seen?, it's called a Lightdow F2 35mm F/2.0 AF Wide Angle.
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
That thing looks a bit cheap and nasty! I might give it a miss...
@Jay-if9dr5 жыл бұрын
No worries, thanks for your reply.
@Banana.Republic3 жыл бұрын
Will this work on the new Sony A7C ?
@saifaldin_3 жыл бұрын
Get the FE 35mm f1.8 instead. This aps-c version will have too much vignetting on a FF body.
@FlossyZach2 жыл бұрын
I am new to photography and I just got a 6500. What is the f point examples you showed? Changes the f pony’s does what for the pictures? Thanks for any feedback
@jordanjoestar8839 Жыл бұрын
Lower the F point the more background blur. It is also known as shooting "wide open" because the lower the F point, the more light enters the camera. Good for night shooting. F6 is darker, with more background sharpness than F1.8 with soft backgrounds but more light let in.
@RajwinderSingh-rx8oy5 ай бұрын
Very informative video. Will the sony 35 mm 1.8 oss lens work with sony ZV E10?? Pls reply...
@49erfan9165 ай бұрын
Yes
@49erfan9165 ай бұрын
Does the purple fringing matter if I’m only going to use this lens for video?
@lb7144Ай бұрын
You shouldn’t have any terrible trouble with video. It will be all the better at f/2.8 instead of wide open. I found one on eBay for $200.00 U.S. in good shape.
@TravelMinds5 жыл бұрын
Hello Christopher. I wanna buy a fast lens for my a6000. I am between this les and sigma 16mm 1.4! I like sigma,is much faster and sharper but without stabilization. You think i can get sharp images with sigma or its better to buy the sony 35mm 1.8?
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
You'll get sharp images with both if you use them properly :-) the Sigma is definitely a much sharper lens, though.
@TravelMinds5 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfrost Thank you!
@rounakgupta69084 жыл бұрын
Hey, I want to upgrade by kit lens of sony a6400. I am looking for a nice prime lens. So which one I should go for sony 35mm f1.8 or sigma 30mm f1.4. I am thinking for sony 35mm f1.8 because it has oss and sony alpha a6400 doesn't have oss inbuilt. Is I am right. Or if not please tell me that does oss makes difference for photography only.
@christopherfrost4 жыл бұрын
Take a look at my review of that Sigma lens and you'll be able to compare them
@MichaelPeterDalsgaard5 жыл бұрын
could this be used on a Fujifilm camera?
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
Nope. Sony E-mount only
@unviaje30804 жыл бұрын
In a 6500 its a 35mm? or you have to consider the crop factor of 1.5?! I don't understand
@ronaldbenz_3 жыл бұрын
It's a 52.5mm full frame equivalent. The lens indeed is a 35mm, but you always need to consider the crop factor
@george.fakinos5 жыл бұрын
Could you do a review on the new Canon ef-m 32mm f/1.4. I have a canon eos m5, nice little camera but the lenses are not that good... Thank you very much!
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
Yes, but in about 6 weeks or so
@george.fakinos5 жыл бұрын
@@christopherfrost thank you very much. I look forward to.
@loveisaremdy5 жыл бұрын
Samyang 35mm or this,? I shoot on a6000 do you reckon the oss is worth it?
@ArteUltra11955 жыл бұрын
loveisaremdy which samyang? Get the Sony if youre not planning on upgrading to full frame or even an a6500. Otherwise, I highly recommend the samyang lenses, even the 35 1.4 for the a6000 if you want to focus on portraits. Its a lot sharper, even on APS-C.
@loveisaremdy5 жыл бұрын
StereoTP95 would be the 2.8 do you reckon the oss would be beneficial on the Sony
@SHORTFILMMANTRA Жыл бұрын
Is it autofocus?
@OCGMAGICIAN5 жыл бұрын
is this considered a wide angle lens ? new to buying lens
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
On an APS-C camera you multiply by 1.5x for the crop factor. So it's actually the full-frame equivalent of 52.5mm, which is a standard field of view, neither wide angle nor telephoto
@mp33115 жыл бұрын
Is this lens compatible with sony a6000 too, right?
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
It's an E-mount lens. It will work on any Sony camera with an E-mount
@philg67575 жыл бұрын
I'm keen to change from Fuji to Sony,except,most of the lenses are priced out of this amateurs range. If Sony dropped their lens prices down to Nikon or Canon range they would almost dominate the market.
@dangernba5 жыл бұрын
Sony sell amazing cameras at reasonable prices, but charge a lot for the lenses.
@caldera8785 жыл бұрын
Lenses are one thing but color science, ergonomics, UI and brand recognition is another thing from other manufacturers.
@jlgulleydesigns5 жыл бұрын
Have you done a video on the new Canon efm 32mm f/1.4?? I wanna scoop that up so bad
@grinningcat3965 жыл бұрын
Third. Real good review, as always.
@linsnowx5 жыл бұрын
Sony’s own apsc lenses (especially primes) never really impressed me. They need to do something better if they want to keep it steaming...
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
The 50mm OSS is very good in fairness (and this one is good for video work)
@linsnowx5 жыл бұрын
I also own that lens... and I wasn't really impressed by its quality too :( It builds a little better than the Canon counterpart but I think it's overpriced. Not to mention the Sigma primes just beat Sony out of the world
@TownofHarmon5 жыл бұрын
6:45 "robbit"
@ManolisMavrakis5 жыл бұрын
I have the lens and I love it
@tommihommi15 жыл бұрын
it's literally 2x the price of the nikon equivalent.
@tuanraven1315 жыл бұрын
They have one, the 35mm f1.8G AF-S DX, very similar to the DT 35mm f1.8 SAM on Sony A-mount system. Before it most of the manufacturers seemed to ignore the need of 50mm equivalent on APS-C, that's why such lenses ended up in low or decent quality only until Fujifilm and Sigma introduced somethings high-performance.
@tommihommi15 жыл бұрын
@@tuanraven131 he's talking about the camera system, nikon only had micro for thirds and now full frame mirrorless, they don't have an APS-C mirrorless system yet. Of course, it's stupid to pay twice as much for similar lenses just to get mirrorless instead of DSLR.
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
Does the Nikon lens have image stabilisation?
@azg23415 жыл бұрын
People often speak that sony lenses overpriced. But if you see deeper... G-master line costs more than "equuvalents" in other systems. But almost every lens in this line outperform every "analog". Sony has cheap 35/1.8 for their old DSLR A-mount - SAL35F18. But technologies go forward and prises too. There is also differences in build quality and other. SEL35F18 light, compact, fullmetall, feels more solid and has image stabilisation. I found it very usefull as universal normal lens.
@azg23415 жыл бұрын
@Phil Jones65 I think main reason of prise differences is just different construction of dslr and mirrorless lenses. There is oss, focus motor, metallic body, optical schema and something else we don't know about. By the way, Fuji 35/2 crop lens has same "unforgivable" price. It weather resistant, but without image stabilisation.
@camil7215 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for another competent and very useful review. Now I know I don't need this lens, even it has OSS...
@porschedemon15 жыл бұрын
mannn, i just got this lens :( Oh well, it's tough keeping up with the Jones'
@lukas35jakob544 жыл бұрын
I own this lens too and i love it. Colours, bokeh, auto-focus and sharpness is overall very good. I love the look of the photos! This lens is small and has a stabilization. Sigma 30mm, 16mm are indeed sharper than the sony, but they are also twice as big and twice as heavy. Stabilization is also missing.
@alex-yd7ju5 жыл бұрын
can we all agree that cheaper sony native lenses suck, especially for the price
@Old_Man_Jay4 жыл бұрын
so....basically this lens is crap image wise at 1.8. I know lots of lenses are weaker wide open but this one seems especially so. A bit of a deal breaker for me really.
@caldera8785 жыл бұрын
We can all guarantee that the Sony a6300 is a rather _old_ camera by technology standards. The massive _overheating-gate, rolling sh*tter_ and the quick release of the a6500 in like the next day _Literally_ makes this the odd, forgotten middle child in Sony's Aps-c E-mount cameras. It didn't live up to the success of the a6000 and of course, never seen the improvements of the a6500, which is a whole better different camera.
@_rhapsodist5 жыл бұрын
I used to have this lens and never liked the way it rendered images so I sold it in the end..I found the bokeh always ugly
@djwilmer72525 жыл бұрын
rhapsodist what did you replace it with?
@_rhapsodist5 жыл бұрын
@@djwilmer7252 the Sigma 18-35 is miles better with the MC-11, but since then I sold all of it and have the A7iii now
@djwilmer72525 жыл бұрын
rhapsodist I did. Now I was thinking of selling it to get the 16mm.
@_rhapsodist5 жыл бұрын
@@djwilmer7252 both are excellent and I bet the new 56mm F1.4 is the same too
@johndao58702 жыл бұрын
Purple flinging is pretty bad wide open.
@ayhancapan5 жыл бұрын
But it looks ugly, no one will assume you are professional with that lens... Better go for sigma 30mm f1.4 dc dn
@christopherfrost5 жыл бұрын
That's a kind of ugly lens too really, hehe
@katflorida83499 ай бұрын
Ugly? You dating lenses now?
@DenisVolga5 жыл бұрын
Couldn't watch this video: the background music is the same as "wait-for-nothing-on-the-phone music" for a couple of state's departments... Too much for my nervous system ;)
@Baluchishair5 жыл бұрын
I think you have blown up the Sony's attampt to make a good lens, and guys as before should rely on 3rd party lenses anyway in near future. I couldn't get my hands on a Sony camera yet, but I think when I say, I haven't been a fan of Sony cameras, you should search for the meanings of the phrase "the grapes are sour."
@angryoaf5 жыл бұрын
"just about recommend it" Confirmed: overpriced lens