Sony a6600 vs Sony a6400 | Which Camera is the Better Investment?

Is the Sony a6600 worth buying over the Sony a6400? Is the a6400 still worth it in 2019 and heading into 2020 as a viable APS-C camera for professionals? Do I regret purchasing the a6400? These two Sony cameras are very capable, but which one is the better investment?
Gear featured in this video:
a6400: geni.us/oXC0F (Amazon)
a6500: geni.us/oMlHB9b (Amazon)
Prime 16mm - geni.us/Xbpn (Amazon)
Zoom Lens - geni.us/OeCA (Amazon)
Sony 85mm: geni.us/bO9Bk (Amazon)
Kit Lens: geni.us/P5kNqK1 (Amazon)
Tripod: geni.us/CyiF91r (Amazon)
Bracket: geni.us/Rx4aA8 (Amazon)
Smallrig Cage for a6400: geni.us/V2y0oOK (Amazon)
Gear Mentioned:
Sony a6600: geni.us/Ekzkv (Amazon)
Sony a7iii: geni.us/aTSW6 (Amazon)
Tamron Lens: geni.us/97me (Amazon)
Sony Zeiss: geni.us/A79fwvb (Amazon)
Zhiyun Crane-M2: geni.us/TY0X5 (Amazon)
Zhiyun Weebill Lab: geni.us/WJMf (Amazon)
Are you subscribed yet? bit.ly/kevinsubscribe
My Primary Camera - geni.us/oMlHB9b (Amazon)
Prime Lens 16mm - geni.us/Xbpn (Amazon)
Prime Lens 30mm - geni.us/Pxdp (Amazon)
Zoom Lens - geni.us/OeCA (Amazon)
Sony 85mm 1.8: geni.us/bO9Bk (Amazon)
Feelworld Master MA5: geni.us/ToshYu7 (Amazon)
SmallRig Setup- geni.us/tcwWC (Amazon)
Manfrotto Bumblebee 230: geni.us/FOhKGI (Amazon)
GoPro - geni.us/CNSSlOS (Amazon)
Joby Gorilla Pod- geni.us/c7mJQ4d (Amazon)
Here’s the mic- geni.us/tj8Ja (Amazon)
Peak Design Clutch - geni.us/Q8P2FDa (Amazon)
Mavic Pro - geni.us/QEzR (Amazon)
This is how I find relevant keywords: www.tubebuddy.com/kevinross
Stay in touch:
/ kevinrossrn
/ kevinrossrn
Kevin Ross
4845 Pearl E. Cir. STE 101
Boulder, CO 80301
I'm a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.
#a6600 #a6400 #Sony

[@walterhernandez4358]

Welp, I bought the A6400 based on your video! I am a beginner and was actually looking at the A6600. After looking at the specs. and watching videos and reading reviews I decided to go with the A6400 with the 18-135 kit lens. You and others here on youtube bring up some pretty good points. I will be using this mainly for photography and overall feel happy with my purchase. Thank you and keep the good work!!!

[@KevinRossRN]

That's great to hear! And, I think the 18-135 is a great choice to start with photography. I try to remain as balanced as I can in my reviews and recommendations. I believe (I hope) this set up will serve you well. 📸👊💥

[@cdreyes81]

Exactly what I need cooming from a6000 which I will still use as my back up

[@KevinRossRN]

@@cdreyes81 Nice! Happy to be of help 👊📸 I'm working on another video right now about the importance of IBIS with photo vs video between the 6400 and 6500, and the results are interesting since the a6400 has some slight performance increases in the AF and I thought it would be clear in the photo realm, but actually it's mixed. Anyway, appreciate your comment.

[@neogod29]

I'm sure you're happy with your purchase. I love the Sony system. I upgraded from the a6000 to the a6600 a couple months ago when it was on sale for $1200. I thino it was way worth it for the upgrades.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@neogod29 OH yeah, don't regret the purchase at all. I may add in the 6600 as another option as I move into full frame for some other work. May just end up having the 6400 as the studio cam with the 6600 and a full frame camera for in the field. Glad you were able to pick it up at that price though. Score 👊💥📸

[@Sr7Sr7Sr7]

Exactly the video I was looking for. Excellent content bud.

[@KevinRossRN]

Awesome! Thanks. Well I hope it helps making a buying decision even easier for you. 📷👊

[@pilemuisc7568]

Literally days away from having to make my decision and this just solidified it. Thank you!!

[@KevinRossRN]

Is that right? Well alrighty then. Glad to hear that. Happy to help and best of luck with your decision.

[@VictorMartinez-vs1nq]

Does an APSC lens such as the 16mm 1.4 sigma still have a crop factor of 1.5? Then making it an actual 24mm when being used with the Sony a6400?

[@KevinRossRN]

Answered the question on the other video, but figured I would pop over here as well to confirm, yes, a 24mm equivalent on these cropped sensors.

[@jordanjohnmusicofficial]

Great insight and really well laid out information. I really enjoyed the rundown!

[@KevinRossRN]

Thanks! Always love giving the rundown 😉

[@nextgengaming074]

You provide great value to us. Thank you, hope you have a great day sir!

[@KevinRossRN]

Very much appreciate that. Happy to help. You have a great day as well. 👍

[@ranjinirajainfilm]

Love your style of review and honesty!! Made my decision a lot easier!

[@KevinRossRN]

Ha! I really appreciate you taking the time to say so. Happy to help. Good luck with your decision. I'd be interested to hear about what you decide and how it's going... Go create something awesome 📸👊

[@shikharjais]

@@KevinRossRN you mean sony a6400 with Gimbal is better than sony a6600?

[@MrPoseidonSays]

Good review buddy I appreciate that. I made my decision already and your video as the few others I have seen have confirmed my purchase of the a6400. 👍💰saving is best!

[@KevinRossRN]

Awesome! And yes, I love saving money. Appreciate you taking the time to jump down here. 📸💥

[@travelwithme8656]

Thx for the video :) do you think, a6400 is good option for vlogging, travelling, KZbin etc? Thx in advance 🙏

[@KevinRossRN]

I use it for all of the above with the 6400. What about your budget? I just ask because it helps when I think about lens purchase.

[@travelwithme8656]

@@KevinRossRN thanks for the response ☺️ my budget is between 800 - 1000 Euro 🙈

[@dnz2208]

@@travelwithme8656 a6400 with sigma 16mm f1.4

[@BeryIstanbulTips]

Hey Kevin, great video. It could be perfect if you have tested a6500 with an oss lens. We could see the effect with ibis+oss lens.

[@KevinRossRN]

Thanks! And, that's a fantastic suggestion friend. Take a peak over here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hpu3d6Zsq8mLpMk You might just find what you're looking for. 😉

[@jl1136]

Definitely appreciate the video. Curious, what made you go with the 6400 instead of the a7iii?

[@KevinRossRN]

That is a great question because honestly the A7iii was my next investment. I still have my eye on it, but "secretly" waiting for that unicorn to pop up, hopefully this year. The recording limit was something that held me back on the purchase. I was able to extend it on the a6500, but couldn't on the A7iii. I do quite a bit of recording over 30 minutes... But honestly it's still a very capable camera with a very aggressive price point. What are you currently filming with, or interested in picking up?

[@jl1136]

I’m currently using the gh5. I had the a7iii and loved it however I had to let it go because it didn’t fit into my current work flow. I’m planning on getting the a7iii again but from watching your video and a couple of other Chanel’s the a6400 is a compelling option.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@jl1136 I think it really comes down to wanting/needing full frame... Well that's obvious I suppose. The a6400 checks so many boxes and a couple more than the A7iii. I'm sure I'll end up with a full frame setup, but honestly I haven't felt limited on APS-C.... Although maybe the lens options, but Sigma is filling that void.

[@geirjohannesen667]

Really useful info!

[@KevinRossRN]

Happy to be of help. Are you currently filming with Sony or looking to start?

[@the_anxiousphotographer]

I'm still having a hard time deciding. I will mainly be using the camera for photography. Landscape, water, wildlife, ect. As far as photography would the ibis make a huge difference ? Thanks.

[@KevinRossRN]

Honestly, for photography, I would recommend it. The IBIS for video is not great... Actually not even good in these cameras... For video. You'll appreciate the IBIS with photography, especially at longer focal lengths, and if you decide to use unstabilized lenses. And, the price has since dropped, so there is that. 📸😉

[@christianmendoza5449]

thanks brother , great video

[@KevinRossRN]

And thank you for the compliment. Glad to serve. 👍📸💥

[@gavinphillips3973]

Great video! I enjoy these kind of videos more as it seems to encourage a potential purchaser to consider their options carefully and think about exactly what they want from a new camera/lens rather than going along with the typical marketing speel that "newer is automatically better". As for me, currently I'm a Sony a-mount user with an a68. I've been looking at potential "upgrades" which are available to me; these include the a77-II (most likely this is the last aps-c a-mount DSLT), the a6400, a6500 (discontinued now but has quite a price drop and still very capable) and the a6600. If going the e-mount route, I'll be using my existing a-mount lenses via an adapter (Sony LAEA-3 most likely) but the IBIS on the a6500 and a6600 should still work with those lenses? Hopefully... Anyway its a tough choice still I think but I really enjoyed your video anyway. Keep up the great work. :)

[@KevinRossRN]

If for some reason the OSS (if your lens has this) doesn't function, the IBIS should be taken care of the sensor of the camera. The only thing I don't have experience with is how the AF will work with those adapters. I've heard some haven't had issues with the native AF lenses, but I'd just research that my friend. Totally understandable wanting to use those lenses since you've already made that investment 👍 Appreciate the feedback. Just trying to help as many as I can make that buying decision.

[@Nickpinn]

This is one of the best comparison videos I've seen on these cameras. The IBIS comparison for getting close shots was very useful. It was also interesting to see the quality of the 16mm sigma lens.

[@KevinRossRN]

Super stoked that this helped. Appreciate you saying so. What are you currently filming with these days?

[@Nickpinn]

@@KevinRossRN I'm just getting started. My a6600 with Sigma 16mm is in the mail bro!

[@KevinRossRN]

@@Nickpinn What!!!??? Sweet brother. Super stoked for you. That combo is killer. Let me know what you think.

[@briantownsend1936]

Thanks for the video! Was trying to decide between 6600 and 6400 as they are closer in price now, but sounds like most still recommend 6400. What lens kit would you recommend I get, and an extra lens. Looking to spend around $1500 ish total. I’ll be taking photos of kids playing basketball, traveling with it, photos of our dogs, and pictures of small new born puppies. Thanks!

[@KevinRossRN]

Just to confirm, you're mostly going to be using it for photography? And do you have a preference for Zoom functionality, or prime lenses? Primes will be sharper for photography.

[@briantownsend1936]

Kevin Ross I need a lens that will get me great photos of little puppies close up. Will do videos too of kids basketball games, but mostly looking to get better photos. Shots while they are playing sports. General travel camera. Close up pictures of puppies. Pictures of dogs.

[@KevinRossRN]

Honestly, you're looking at multiple setups here. You're going to get the best results (in my opinion) with prime lenses like the Sigma 16mm or 30mm for photography. Those will give you a full-frame equivalent to a 24mm and close to 50mm, which is what I would be shooting for photo, especially portraits. Shooting sports is a whole different scenario. You need something fast that can keep up, however you'll also likely need to go with a Zoom like the Sony 18-135 (based on your budget). The focal length on this will likely net you some softer results around the edges as you zoom in, which unfortunately would be expected as this is classified as a "beginner" lens. Not to mention the variable aperture from 3.5-5.6...that'll also be a factor when it comes to your lighting. If it were me, just starting out I would assess what I'm going to be shooting the most...not everything I want to shoot, but what is my primary use case. Camera bodies are certainly important, but the glass you put on them is even more important and the biggest investment you'll make over the years. I'm mostly into video, but if I just had to pick one lens for both video and photo, and at around your budget, the Sony 18-105 hands down. I've taken great photos with it, and the video output is awesome as well. The constant f4 aperture is a win over the 18-135 in my book. I know this might not be the exact info you're wanting, but just giving you more questions to ask as far as your top priorities and needs. I've just never been able to get the same results out of zooms as I do with primes when it comes to photography. I'd much prefer switching out a trio of lenses like the Sigma 16, 30, and 56 to get those sharp images...It's a little extra work, but will net you better results.

[@tomi2835]

Great video, Kevin ! Thank you so much. I am thinking about shooting more and more video clips and fictions. And yet, I am still wondering if the improvements on the a6600 (color, IBIS, Battery life, eye detection, overheating...) are really worth the price. Thanks again !

[@KevinRossRN]

It’s still a pretty popular camera, but with the Sony a7c now launched as the full frame option for a reasonable bump in price, I think it’s definitely getting folks to think about it a bit more in terms of what they need now vs. what they need in the future. The full frame option is nice, but it’s obviously more expensive as well as the lenses typically being more expensive. The IBIS isn’t great, but what it will do if offer some help with micro jitters that occur handheld.

[@tomi2835]

@@KevinRossRN Thanks so much for your quick answer ! FullFrame cameras are way too expensive... a6600 would be the limit but is it really worth it ? Especially if I have to buy a gimble to stabilize properly... I am really considering purchasing the 6400. Thanks so much for your great advice.

[@KevinRossRN]

If you're going to be using a gimbal, then I'd put that savings you'll get with the 6400 and put it towards that gimbal or another lens. At that point, on a gimbal, you're stabilized. Happy to help.

[@Princeton_James]

Love my a6400 but all these cameras and all released relatively close in time = Sony the new Apple.

[@KevinRossRN]

Yeah, it seems a lot of these manufacturers are doing this. But again, I knew this was likely since they did it with the 6300 and 6500. You've still got an awesome camera. I love the 6400.

[@phaceless1]

Sony is the Appleseed

[@retireddronist1641]

Like the way you analyse this. I'm on G80, and the autofocus is just pathetic, i can't use my new ronin SC with it because on every shots the AF is just doing shit ... i'm looking for a camera with a nice AF, but i've seen videos where the Ronin SC coupled with the a6400, the background is really shaky ... certainly because of the absence of IBIS ... so my question is ... waiting november and invest in a a6600 with IBIS to use it with gimbal ? What do you think about the AF of the A6400 on a gimbal ? (I'm frensh, sorry for my aproximative english ... ahah)

[@KevinRossRN]

I have a lot of experience with the a6400 on a gimbal with an unstabilized lens and it is fine. The issue is that you really need to make sure the gimbal/camera are balanced properly. Micro jitters (shake) can occur if the motors are fighting the balance. An OSS lens would help with much of this however. In my opinion I think having an OSS lens is better than the IBIS alone... For video. Sony's auto focus is amazing, but the built in IBIS... Not so much. And besides even with the 6600, you'd still want a gimbal for some of your work.

[@retireddronist1641]

@@KevinRossRN Ok thanks for your answer ! Wich stabilised lenses can i choose with the a6400 ?

[@KevinRossRN]

@@retireddronist1641 The 16-50mm kit lens is really a bargain if you buy it with the a6400...BUT, I literally just posted a video on the 18-105: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l6DUfJumqZKZh7s If you can control lighting...or bring some portable options (depending on your setup/environment) this could be a good next step, especially with gimbal work.

[@TedNemeth]

Thanks for this Kevin. Helped me. Your test agrees with most tests that show Sony’s IBIS is really not very good.

[@KevinRossRN]

Really glad this helped.... I appreciate you taking the time to let me know. What are you currently filming with?

[@MightySuki]

I am worring about battery life on a6400. How much does it last? Also battery grip woth extra battery is cool option but noone is talking about it..

[@KevinRossRN]

So here's what I'd say about battery life, specifically how long it lasts (based on my workflow): I'm more run and gun with my workflow than I am in the studio. So that means the camera gets turned on and off a lot, or is also just left on in a standby mode. From my experience of doing the 6400 vs 6500 videos, I can safely say that the upgrade in chipset does give about 15-20+% increase in battery life overall. That being said I'd usually have about five to six FW-50 batteries for a day of filming like this on the a6500, whereas three to four of the same batteries usually get me through that type of filming on the 6400. For long interviews or studio filming, I use the iFootage, which I did a video on here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qGrJipqZnJ2LjdE Just plugging in an external battery pack doesn't really give you a charge you're looking for and in most of my cases it just makes it so the battery drains slower, but it still drains...However the iFootage doesn't work like that. As far as the battery grip, I think that these can be helpful, but the reason I didn't go with one is that it does increase the footprint of the camera, which adds weight, I also use a cage to protect the camera, and I also like to be able to pop it on a gimbal and not have to make too many adjustments in the balance and also having it hit the motors of the gimbal since the footprint is bigger. But simply put, I don't have an "exact" time because I rarely just turn it on and leave it, which many videos may have that set up with a timer to show you...I'm just on the move too much. But would I like having that Z battery and potentially get through a day of filming with one, maybe two batteries? Honestly, yes.

[@jpg1753]

Your videos are amazing man! Thankyou. Was going to upgrade to the a6600 cus of ibis but im going to stick with the 6400. Thankyou for saving me a few hundred dollars 😀

[@KevinRossRN]

I love saving people some money. What do you mostly film?

[@a.tpioneerroofing1156]

So im new to the vlogging stuff . But i would like to purchase something good on the first run some are telling me to start off with a go pro 8 but i would like to do just a one purchase get it right the first time. My plan is to record high quality “How to metal roof “ and occasional vlogs at the office. So what would ya recommend me getting for a in house and on top of a roof recording being more outdoor stuff . ??

[@KevinRossRN]

I believe the recommendation for the GoPro is likely due to you (and the camera) being on the roof, which is the safe bet. I would have a hard time recommending a DSLR or mirrorless camera if that would be your primary, unless you had someone dedicated as your camera person. A question however, what kind of phone do you have? Now, to build on the GoPro, you can definitely vlog on it. If you're not too worried about dynamic range, which is really being able to adjust your lens settings to get various types of shoots (that's an oversimplification), then I'd say yep, you got that covered. For getting up on a roof, the GoPro is lightweight, you can strap it to your chest, wrist, hat/head, or you could get something like this to clamp it to nearby objects: amzn.to/34pNC34 Now, if going with the GoPro and you're out in the sun, which I assume is likely to always be the case, then you're going to want to invest in something like these: amzn.to/3cddsu1 Think of them as sunglasses for your camera. You can't really adjust your GoPro camera settings like you can with a DSLR or mirrorless setup where you can dial your shutter speed, etc. to adjust for exposure. And, if you keep everything on auto, which would be okay, but you'll find that you'll have various changes in your lighting when you bring that footage into post production. Not to mention that those "sunglasses" will help with the colors that come out of the camera. GoPros are known (in the GoPro color profile) to really saturate the image especially when things get really blown out with your lighting. So, as much as I'd recommend any of these Sony cameras, I'm not sure you'd be happy lugging that up there and worrying about it being damaged. And I get that you'd like to just have a one and done situation here, I'm sure that would be easier on the budget. Think of it as a tool my friend. When I'm building something, I tend to have a hammer and a mallet, multiple screw drivers, a drill driver and/or a hammer drill, a circular saw and a miter saw...which I'm sure you know what I'm talking about, first hand. Just trying to help. Anyway, what about your phone, what do you have?

[@a.tpioneerroofing1156]

Kevin Ross thank you for the response . I currently have a iphone Xs max

[@KevinRossRN]

Awesome, you've got a great camera already, that's with you all the time 😉 Have you looked at Moment, which specializes in cases and lenses for smartphones? Something like this: amzn.to/3a64IVa paired with something like this: amzn.to/3b0pFlx Or better yet, just head over to Moment: www.shopmoment.com/ You've got a great start with that phone. Very capable camera. However, that could be your vlogging setup, while the GoPro could be your "work horse."

[@x3sKoL]

I am "jumping" from amateur to pro during this year, I was thinking of a Sony a6400 as a B camera that I will be using and then buy a Sony full frame (probably the a7iii) for the next blackfriday. My partner would be using the Sony a6400 then and I would get the full frame. What do you think of this? My main concern is lenses, to me the ideal would be buying lenses for the a6400 that I could use later for the a7iii... I am still an amateur! but I am studying so much and investing just because I truly love it. So far I have been using my mother's old Nikon DSLR. I loved the video! thanks a million

[@KevinRossRN]

Happy to help. So, I think you're following a reasonable path of the a6400 and something like the A7iii, and specifically just talking about the color science and same picture profiles. It will help greatly with color correction in post if you're working with the same picture profiles and/or color science, especially when starting out. The A7iii will likely have a successor this year, so it'll definitely come down in price even further, and of course give you something else to think about when it comes to buying the successor or saving some money with the A7iii. Lenses are definitely another story. Yes, APS-C lenses can go on full-frame as well as full-frame on APS-C, however you want to make sure you're getting the most out of that full-frame. Putting an APS-C lens on the A7iii works, but you'll really want to be in that crop mode function, which is built into the camera...essentially there's an APS-C mode in the A7iii. And, if you put full-frame glass on the a6400 just remember the crop factor, so putting a full-frame 85mm (which I personally own) will give you something like 127mm full-frame equivalent. Now, moving back to the A7iii I would certainly be concerned that you're not getting the full benefits of that camera if you're not investing in some full frame glass. Lenses are the real investment. The camera bodies are important, but the lenses can transfer to any new or old (as long as they're e-mount) camera bodies, so just keep that in mind. Personally I would think about maybe starting with the Sony 18-105 for the a6400 if you're more video centric. This was my first lens purchase and still use it today. For the full-frame you could also start with a zoom, something from either Tamron or Sigma to save a little money, but also get some pretty good value too. Would you be primarily video vs photo, or the other way around? And, if photo, what do you think you'd primarily be shooting?

[@glendagarcia_]

Was torn in between these two cameras and which to purchase. Thanks to your video, I can be at peace purchasing the A6400 :)

[@KevinRossRN]

Well I am glad to set your mind at ease. Happy to help. Wishing you the best on your future creative endeavors.

[@fabianperez6588]

How about for events photografy wich one would you get?

[@KevinRossRN]

Either one will serve you well. Honestly though I'd put the cost savings of the 6400 toward some really good lenses. As I said in the video, in my opinion, the 6600 is really starting to tease that price of the A7iii... And I've also started to see used A7riii bodies for under 1800 USD, which I think is a bargain for what you get. Anyway, the a6400 is great, but I would recommend using a stabilized lens, which the 500 cost savings could really help. What are you currently filming with?

[@MiddleofKnowhere]

Thanks for this. Totally affirmed my decision to go with the 6400. I have a YT channel focusing on tech so my camera will mostly be in a tri-pod and movement will be panning from the fluid mount more than anything. Glad I saved the cash. I'll try to use OSS lenses when out and about, but you've sold me on that Sigma 16/1.4 for wide angle shots (already watched the other video). Owning a camera with interchangeable lenses is such a rabbit hole lol.

[@KevinRossRN]

Yeah, if you are on a tripod, then definitely save some dough. And yes, the Sigma 16mm is just a ridiculous lens. I've been filming with it all day today and I'm always still amazed at the quality for the price point. The rabbit hole is real. 😉📷 Glad I was able to help. Let me know what you think of the setup once you get it.

[@MiddleofKnowhere]

@@KevinRossRN Will do! Already have the camera with the 16-50 kit lens and also bought the Sony 35mm/1.8, and this week I've been researching optimal settings and focus tips and stuff. Really want to hone the craft and learn to do pull focus and other things. Information is great to give, but if I can combo it with a stellar presentation then all the better. So far I've found the 16-50 gives me a wider shot so I can fit in with something big like a PC case, while the 35 allows for better bokeh and close-up goodness. I'm hoping that sigma 16mm will allow for both wide and bokeh and it sounds like it will, so time to save.

[@KevinRossRN]

Yeah, the 16-50 is a pretty good kit lens to start with, but when you get that Sigma it's just going to blow you away. Not to mention that you can zoom in 1.5x with it. I did a video on that...very easy to do and you don't lose any detail when filming in 4K.

[@TexpatOTG]

My gimbal cam is an a5100. I control it with a cellphone app, Camoodoo. I can even touch focus with the app. I only shoot 1080p and always record sound to a Tascam recorder. The upgrade path for me would probably be the a6400. I think the weather-sealed magnesium body would be an advantage here in Vietnam. I really have to be careful with my a5100. Overall I think the a6400 is a home-run. I am always using tripods, monopods and gimbals, so the a6500 wouldn't offer much to me for the big price difference. Good common sense review and comparison. Appreciate your effort!

[@KevinRossRN]

That's awesome that you can touch focus through the app. And, I have a Zoom H6 that I use for external recording... Depending on what/where I'm filming, so I get where you're coming from there. I agree (obviously) that if you are already stabilized with your workflow of tripods and gimbals, the a6400 for the price is a much better investment... Even if you weren't locked off, I still think it's the better buy. Appreciate you jumping in here with your setup. Feel free to keep me posted. 📸

[@ricanj4587]

Thanks for the video, it help me make my decision on going with the a6400 rather than the a6600!

[@KevinRossRN]

That's awesome. Happy to help. Feel free to keep me posted on your experience with it. 👊📷

[@ronynandi]

You saved my money bud. Subbed

[@KevinRossRN]

I love saving people money. Awesome! 👍

[@rachelwiley8613]

Question: Do you still recommend the 6400 (and which lens) for taking baseball photos of my Son?

[@KevinRossRN]

I definitely recommend the a6400, and yes for sports photos...a question to you would be what is a comfortable budget? I have the Sony 18-105 OSS (stabilized) lens amzn.to/2oLCZHd and use it for my kids soccer games...There's also the Sony 18-135 (paired with the a6400: amzn.to/2neQ6Ai) that could work...these are what I would consider "budget friendly" zoom lenses. I can add some other options in there if you're looking for a bit more "pro" level...with a "pro" level price of course. And I could also suggest some other options if you're locked off on a tripod sometimes...Anyway, happy to help where I can.

[@walterhernandez4358]

@@KevinRossRN Don't mean to butt in, but I'm also interested in this. What "pro" level price lenses do you recommend? Also I will be using my A6400 to take photos of models. By models I mean toy models; robots, cars, scale building, and occasionally sports and nature.

[@KevinRossRN]

Are you interested in doing any macro style photography with those toy models?

[@walterhernandez4358]

@@KevinRossRN As a matter of fact I am. I'm doing research on what lens to get for this type of photography. Any advice? I have a healthy budget for this as long as I can get great quality photos. Also what would be a good all around versatile lens to upgrade from the kit lens? Something for portrait, landscape, nature, sports. I understand this may be too much to ask out of any one lens. Any lens would have to have OSS since the camera is not stabilized... Thanks in advance...

[@KevinRossRN]

I'll offer up a couple of options with a couple of different price ranges. And yes, hard to find the lens that can do it all, but rather offering the most bang. Depending on how much macro you're doing I would look at the Sony 90mm: amzn.to/336BdPH crazy sharp and versatile when it comes to macro. You can obviously do some portraiture, but this may not be as fast as you'd like for that use. It's full frame, so you're looking at an equivalent focal length of about 135mm Two Macro runner ups would be the Sony 30mm: amzn.to/30ST8Id and another would be the Sigma 70mm: amzn.to/2LPOUgg You'd want to be locked off on these shots due to the lack of OSS. Sports, landscape, portraits (these are full frame so just account for a 1.5 crop factor): Sony 24-105: amzn.to/35aXNsq Sony 24-70: amzn.to/2AMCdwv Sony 85mm: amzn.to/2LTtG0M This is the one that I personally use on my 6400 and 6500. It's a crop factor/focal length of 127mm. My kids play soccer, so fast moving. It's a very fast prime lens. Also it's 1.8 aperture and also great for indoor. I'm sure you'll want to do a little research, but see what you think. I'm sure I could keep going ;)

[@everytube5600]

Kevin ross ! One question... for the a6400 the 15-50mm lens is it for cinematic video ? . Because the a6400 is the camera for me but im not sure about the lens !!!.

[@KevinRossRN]

Just wanted to clarify...did you mean the 16-50mm kit lens?

[@everytube5600]

@@KevinRossRN omg im sorry. Yes the 16-50mm lens kit ?

[@KevinRossRN]

No worries...I figured as much. So, not sure what your skill level is, but many will say it all depends on the filmmaker/photographer. The kit lens is $100USD with the camera, which honestly is a bargain, but I also have to admit I don't normally throw it in my bag and only use it for comparison videos since I do have other lenses. I will however be doing a cinematic review of the kit lens paired with the a6400...hopefully coming soon. But to answer your question directly, if you have the budget (if it doesn't break the bank) I would say upgrading your lens will definitely improve your opportunities to get that cinematic footage. These cameras are very capable, but the glass you put on them can level up your image quality...but again as long as you know how to use it. The best way to learn is to just keep doing it, making mistakes, learning, and repeating. The 16-50mm lens will not be as sharp as other lenses, but in my opinion everything in your footage doesn't need to be "tack" sharp. It also has a variable aperture, so when you Zoom in on the lens you have to account for any ISO/lighting/exposure changes that may occur in video, so if you start wide at 16mm it'll be open to f3.5, but as you zoom in it'll be f5.6, which may mess with your footage a bit and depends on whether you're shooting manual or auto. This may be a long answer, but just wanted to give you my two cents here. You can certainly get some good footage with it, but you will realize that once you upgrade you will be able to push that lens and your camera quite a bit further for what you want.

[@everytube5600]

@@KevinRossRN this is great. Not only you gave me good info, your help is what i was looking for. Im so exited to purchase this camera. K. Ross long answer and good details i needed. You sure care about your viewers. I subscribe to your channel i like how you give reviews also. Thank you for your time and answer.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@everytube5600 hey there, sorry for the delay... Somehow this comment got buried... As they sometimes do. Yes, I just want to help people to be able to make a purchasing decision that fits their needs. Always happy to help 👊📸

[@senjugudin]

Thanks for the information, I really torn with getting a6600 or a6400. But now i realise that a6400 is sufficient because anyway i shoot video on gimbal and I dont need that below average ibis that cause that cost that much, I would get a new lense with extra batts with that amount. Thanks man!

[@KevinRossRN]

Happy to be of help. Hope your setup fits your needs...can't it imagine that it won't. Yeah, the IBIS just isn't that phenomenal...and especially if you're primarily shooting video anyway. If you decide to invest in the a6400 (or even the 6600 if you change your mind), feel free to let me know. 📷👊

[@thierrylerinckx1340]

I waited till the 6600 and 6100 were announced and came out with the same conclusion from exactly the same considerations and purchased the 6400 without even blinking an eye. I am happy to see that you confirm my decision in this excellent video. Thank you. Also on the 6100, for 150€ difference it lacks the magnesium body, the weatherproofing, the long life shutter mech. and the Evf is lower in definition. Just a few differences in hardware. That's worth more than 150€ in by book.

[@KevinRossRN]

That's awesome! Yes, still to this day I do not regret it. That poor 6100 will likely end up in the hands of those that may be starting out, and yes, they'll have a capable camera, but for just a bit more I think you're getting more than $150 worth of features. 📸👍

[@sanyamshitole]

Firstly Great comparison video ever. Should i go for the A6400 for mainly shooting cinematic bRolls , slomos my Major focus is only on shooting cinematic travel content?

[@KevinRossRN]

What’s the price difference where you are between these two cameras? I just ask because I still own the 6400 and it’s still great, but having a stabilized lens is helpful for those handheld shots. You can certainly do those shots without a stabilized lens with the proper technique.

[@sanyamshitole]

@@KevinRossRN the price difference is 200$ between a6400 and a6600. I just want to purchase a camera where i can get handheld bRolls for slomos

[@KevinRossRN]

@sanyamshitole well, the one thing to consider is an all-in price. So, if you have the IBIS, which offers just a slight edge over the 6400, then you could have more options for non stabilized lenses that are often times cheaper. What lens (or lenses) have you considered?

[@sanyamshitole]

@@KevinRossRN I was thinking of Sony 35mm f1.8 OSS or Sony 50mm f1.8 OSS , i was thinking of buying a6400 with an OSS lens which later on if needed i can buy an affordable gimbal . what would be better according to you buying A6400 with OSS lens and saving money for gimbal OR going for A6600 which has an IBIS ?

[@SuperDeadmachine]

Hi Kevin, Thanks for your awesome video. Which camera would you suggest for video within these price range since the IBIS is not that great on A6600?

[@KevinRossRN]

Which type of video are you doing? How about lens consideration?

[@SuperDeadmachine]

@@KevinRossRN My main focus at the moment is content for my partner's label (outfits and such). But I'm keen on taking it on the road for travel as well. At the moment, I was thinking of getting a A6400 with sigma 15mm f1.4, but looking at the raw footage on KZbin using the setup without any gimbals, the footage looks unusable, I think.

[@KevinRossRN]

Is the a6600 within your price range? And/or what about the a6500? Have you also looked at any other camera systems? Canon or Fuji?

[@SuperDeadmachine]

@@KevinRossRN I've looked into Fuji XT4 as well. However, I am in love with Sony's colours. :)

[@KevinRossRN]

Is the XT4 in your budget? Because Sony is releasing the A7c which is a full frame camera that's a bit smaller, but around the price of the XT4.

[@trvl7524]

Thanks alot! But can you please tell me what should I invest in? a6400+ a gimble or a6600?

[@JeruzGabriel]

I have both camera. And A gimbal as well. Stick with A6400

[@KevinRossRN]

Thanks for weighing in with your experience... Do you end up using the gimbal often?

[@JeruzGabriel]

@@KevinRossRN When I do B-rolls I use my gimbal but for most shots (photography) I do handheld shots. If budget is not a constraint, The A6600 is a good option for better battery life, larger grip (you can buy an attachment for A6400), I prefer the buttons and feels of the A6600. But if budget is a constraint, the A6400 is the best option.

[@JeruzGabriel]

@@KevinRossRN If this will be first Sony Camera, you won't know what you'll miss with A6600 anyway. Start small and when you feel like upgrading, cameras retain their value anyway, well relative to smartphones

[@KevinRossRN]

Appreciate you sharing. Yes, I agree that if budget isn't too much of a consideration, the 6600 is a good choice. In the US it tends to drop down in price by 200-300 dollars, which I think $1198 USD is more reasonable, but I know in other countries that it doesn't change much if at all. Anyway, always good to hear other perspectives.

[@KevinRossRN]

Did I end up regretting the purchase of the Sony a6400, especially since the a6600 was just announced? How about you? If you've made this purchase, do you regret it? Which camera in this APS-C line up seems to be the better investment?

[@bagusfamily]

A6400 is the best.. Best budget, best after sales, best value, best camera with gimbal..

[@KevinRossRN]

I'm with you 👍👊It's really a hard camera to beat when it comes to price, and just overall value. I really don't find myself missing IBIS...and to spend a significant amount more for IBIS, especially when Sony's IBIS apparently (per other creators) hasn't really improved, then I'm still sold on the a6400 as the better option for my use case.

[@miiasiin]

If they had pumped up the megapixels on 6600 i would've gone for it. the price will be only 400 less than a7m3 where i live, so doesn't make much sense.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@miiasiin agreed. I don't think we'll see a significant bump in mp offering in the APS-C for a while... And yeah, this is where things get confusing as far as a6600 vs just moving into full frame. The A7iii was priced aggressively from the get, so I think that just causes more confusion about whether to stay APS-C... Depending on one's use case of course.

[@GuitarRJP]

Kevin, I have the A7iii already so I was considering the A6600 because the batteries would match! However, the A6400 + Sigma 16mm and +30mm is just a bit more than the A6600 - if using for video you can get a gimbal which would do better than Sony IBIS anyway!

[@dimitarkojuharov3647]

Тhank you and from far away Bulgaria for the comprehensive video !!!

[@KevinRossRN]

It's my pleasure... Hope it helps you in making a decision. Appreciate you dropping down here in the comments 👊📸

[@dimitarkojuharov3647]

@@KevinRossRN Yes ! Thank you so much.

[@Petersonmgee]

I just sold my 6300.. along with all my batteries (5) and a grip.. is it even worth it to get a 6400 coming from 63 at this point? Having to rebuy the same batterie and grip.. Or should I just make the jump to 6600? Thanks.

[@KevinRossRN]

Happy to help, but a question I have for you would be what additional features are you hoping to get that aren't in the 6300?

[@Petersonmgee]

@@KevinRossRN Better video quality mostly. I actually got the Fuji XT3 instead.. I love it!

[@techoasys]

@@Petersonmgee I have heard that's an incredible camera! Fuji are the APS-C Kings IMO.

[@KevinRossRN]

Ah! I just now see that I never responded... YT isn't great at showing us follow up responses sometimes... What did you end up with?

[@KevinRossRN]

Fuji is great. Is this what you're filming with now?

[@hirostvjapan]

I bought a6400 in late May and loving it for sure. I was waiting to buy a gimbal and see if a6600 is the huge difference over a6400 because I may change it. But not much difference so I will buy gimbal and stick with a6400. If a6600 had IBIS like G85 that I had before then yes I would have changed it but with a6600 IBIS not that good to change it.

[@KevinRossRN]

Agreed. If the IBIS was comparable, then it may be a consideration, but again, the extra $500 USD is still a stretch for only a few "upgraded" features. It's just starting to tease that price point of the A7iii. Are you hybrid? Mostly video, photo?

[@hirostvjapan]

@@KevinRossRN I take video's for my KZbin channel and to take video and pictures of my family.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@hirostvjapan gotcha 👌Well, I do think you've got the perfect camera for that 😉

[@hirostvjapan]

@@KevinRossRN yes it's perfect but do need gimbal. Video get shaky

[@KevinRossRN]

@@hirostvjapan Do you have a particular gimbal you're looking at to purchase?

[@lostinoc3528]

thanks for video, made it clear the a6600 is the right choice for me.

[@KevinRossRN]

Happy to help... Feel free to report back if/when you make that purchase. Would love to know your thoughts. 👊📸

[@therealcinnimo]

I am a beginner who bought the canon sl3 and outgrew it within 1 year. Now I want to switch to Sony. Is the a6400 good enough of an upgrade or should I save longer and go for the a6600 or even the a7III? I'm doing mostly Portrait photography, sports and low light events...

[@KevinRossRN]

The 6400 would work in those situations, but honestly, if you’re able to grab the a7iii due to it being full frame, you might consider it.

[@therealcinnimo]

@@KevinRossRN thank you Kevin 😊

[@KevinRossRN]

You bet. Sending my best.

[@stefanodezottis1621]

I was considering to buy the a6400 when the a6600 was announced. I'd use it mainly for videos. I think the money I'd save buying the a6400 would be better spent on a a good gimbal or on good lenses. I never used a gimbal because I started making videos on a GoPro Hero 7 Black and now I'm upgrading to a mirrorless camera. Is it correct to say that a6400 + stabilised lenses + gimbal would be always better than a6600 without gimbal and equivalent to a6600 with gimbal?

[@KevinRossRN]

That's awesome you're considering the switch. The a6400 + OSS lens + gimbal will definitely be more stabilized than the a6600 without a gimbal...that would actually be the case for most cameras however. The gimbal is going to offer you quite a bit of stabilization already...it's just in how you use it. Like, don't run down the street heavy footed and expect to see this buttery smooth footage. There will still be shake in there. But like I said, even with the a6600 having IBIS in it, if you really want to stabilize it even more, a gimbal would be the go to choice here. The a6400 paired with just a gimbal alone and compared to the a6600 with a gimbal would be pretty close, and easily stabilized further in post production. The quick example of me panning through the living area into that kitchen was done on the a6400, the 16mm (not stabilized), and a gimbal...and I didn't add in any extra stabilization in post. The OSS lens will offer stabilization for pitch and yaw, which are really the moves you'll be performing quite a bit on a gimbal, so just a little added bonus of stabilization. If I didn't answer your question, just let me know, but yes, the money you'll save can be spent on your glass and a gimbal.

[@stefanodezottis1621]

@@KevinRossRN Thanks, you answered to my point. Creating my videos just for fun, the a6400 + OSS lens + gimbal would help my budget and would provide results more than acceptable, I think. The a6600 isn't worth the money for me, missing the 4K @ 60p too.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@stefanodezottis1621 yeah, and as I said in the video the Z battery in the 6600 is nice, but not 500 USD+ nice. Sensor is the same, color science, picture profile... Same. Oh, and the continuous video eye auto focus is nice, but I've been shooting with Sony for a while now and the auto focus on all of these cameras is just phenomenal. Feel free to keep me posted on your decision and filming experience 👍📸

[@stefanodezottis1621]

By the way, what gimbal would you suggest? For the a6400 + Sony 18-105mm F4 OSS (that is the glass I'm thinking to start with) I was considering the Zhiyun Crane Plus. (I like the DJI Ronin S but is expensive).

[@KevinRossRN]

You may also want to look at the Weebill lab...I linked that up in the description. That'll come in at around the same price as the crane plus. The 18-105 is awesome. I'm editing a video right now on using the a6400 and 18-105. It was my first lens purchase when I got my a6500.

[@TJuice1986]

If you get your hands on a 90D you should do a low light test between the a6400 & 90D as well as image quality between the two. I know I’ve been searching for those 2 videos and no one has done them yet.

[@KevinRossRN]

I know... As soon as the 90D was announced I did think about it for comparison. I really want to test that camera... But only if I can get someone to loan it to me for a test. Working that angle 😉

[@ananthums8970]

I miss 120fps af on 90d badly 😑

[@KevinRossRN]

What are you mostly filming?

[@ananthums8970]

@@KevinRossRN am an actually a beginner ... I have canon 700d the 2 kit lenses and the nifty 50 ... I wanna upgrade ... First I thought of the 90d But... The main thing I miss on 90d is it does not have 120fps af ... Y canon doing this idk ....ya so am looking into sony a6600 . I do portraits now ... Am looking into vdo stuffs also .

[@KevinRossRN]

The autofocus on these Sony’s is amazing. I know switching systems can be quite an investment, but at the end of the day get the gear that best suits your needs.

[@bobbyprado6831]

This is the third time I’ve watch this exact video and ive been jumping back and forward between the a6600 and a 6400. Initially I wanted the a6600 but as days go by I’ve come realize that it isn’t well worth the “upgrades they added”. After all that said, and after hours of tryna decide I still can’t. It’s the holiday season and I’m about to purchase a camera real soon. So Kevin I was wondering if you’d get a a6600 tester soon and look at it again and do a new comparison between the a6600 and a 6400. I’m really stressing on which to pick :(

[@SkyGW]

it isn't. Better invest the savings in good glass instead.

[@KevinRossRN]

Didn't get a chance to circle back around...how is the decision making process going my friend?

[@bobbyprado6831]

Kevin Ross I’m sad but Ive decided to pick up the a6600..

[@KevinRossRN]

@@bobbyprado6831 don't feel sad... You'll have a great camera. Would love to hear what you think when you get some time with it.

[@bobbyprado6831]

Kevin Ross hey Kevin hope y’all are having a great vacation! I was now wondering what would pair better with the a6400 and or which lens would be a better purchase. A6400 paired with the Sony18-105 or Sony16-70 Zeiss Lens?

[@TW-iu9zy]

... thx for sharing the informations! I will go for the a6600 with the 16-55/f 2.8 and the new Weebill S.

[@KevinRossRN]

Sounds great! Be sure to keep me posted (if you want) on what you think of the 6600. I'll be curious to know.

[@TW-iu9zy]

Kevin Ross ... I will! 👍🏻 Hopefully I will get the new gear within two weeks.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@TW-iu9zy Awesome! Excited for you 📸👊💥

[@mrapter7]

Have a 6500 need an upgrade to a camera that doesn’t dim the damn screen! Love the video

[@KevinRossRN]

Yeah, the 6400 screen is much better in that regard.

[@mihirgolani66]

What should I buy The A6400 with Sony 10-18mm and Sony 35mm Or the A6600 with Sigma 16mm and 30mm ? My use is Travel vlogging I have already ordered the first combination but I'm still confused please help me I can the order as well

[@KevinRossRN]

So to confirm, you've already ordered the 6400 with those lenses?

[@mihirgolani66]

@@KevinRossRN yes

[@KevinRossRN]

So, I thought per our last conversation you wanted to stick with being able to go as wide as possible, which the 10-18 will provide you. Like I said before, the 6600 with IBIS would allow you to have non-stabilized lenses, however honestly, the IBIS isn't a game changer in the Sony cameras. The autofocus however is amazing in both cameras. So, are you not as concerned about going wider than 10mm?

[@mihirgolani66]

@@KevinRossRN ya not really because the 10-18mm is super expensive and I think the kit lens would do it fine for vlogging. And I should spend money on Sony 18-105mm and Sigma 30mm and also get a gimbal Please tell me on this. What do you think?

[@mihirgolani66]

I know I'm making it a bit confusing but, the final, I think should be A6400 with 16-50mm kit lens (to vlog)+ Sony 35mm + Sony 18-105mm+ Gimbal.

[@jimthomson9044]

I have a Sony NEX-6; very happy with it for many years, Was ready to buy an a-6400 until the recent $200 price drop on the a-6600. Is IBIS worth an additional $300?

[@KevinRossRN]

Here’s what I will say. Overall you could put that savings into a stabilized lens, however I will say that the IBIS is nice to take out those microjitters when doing handheld, but for general walking around it’s harder to appreciate that IBIS. However on the flip side of spending 300 more, having the IBIS would also allow you to pick up (cheaper) non-stabilized lenses.

[@jimthomson9044]

@@KevinRossRN so the answer is. ......? a6400 verses aa6600?

[@KevinRossRN]

Well the answer is in how you film. If it’s stuck on a tripod most of the time then IBIS really doesn’t matter, but I just put those points out there to consider. Have you thought about lenses?

[@jimthomson9044]

@@KevinRossRN Yes, about lenses: I doubt if I will every buy more than 1-2 more lenses. I have 3 e-mount OSS lenses now. Two kit and recently the 18-135 OSS which I am very happy with. If I stick with the a6400, I could use the extra $$ to keep buying Sony OSS lenses. But, with the a6600 if I used non-Sony lenses would the auto focus still work OK?

[@KevinRossRN]

Yes, the AF will be good. It does however depend on the lens. The sigma line and the Tamron are both very responsive on the Sony bodies.

[@Kidsonss]

Talking in terms of Investment I have the a6300 and in your opinion would it be worth my while to go to the a6400 - I do little to no video photography

[@KevinRossRN]

What do you mainly shoot? And, what benefits are you looking to gain over the 6300? Also, what lens(s) are you currently filming with?

[@Kidsonss]

@@KevinRossRN Family - Golf on the course and evening events - Dinner Parties - Holidays - Cruising etc

[@KevinRossRN]

@@Kidsonss if no (or very little) video, then I would say that you may be better off investing in better lenses. The sensor is essentially the same... The chipset tied to that sensor is updated in the 6400, but for photography... Really think the glass you put on that camera is going to make a bigger difference... That is if you're staying with an APS-C body, which it sounds like you are. Not sure if this helps, but just wanted to present a case to hold on to what you have and increase the possibilities of your output in the lens choice. Lenses (usually) are the better investment.

[@Kidsonss]

I have the following Sony Lens 16-50mm - 55-210mm - 50mm f1.8 - 18-105 F4 - I also have a number of Cann Lenses which from time to time I use with the A6300

[@Kidsonss]

As an Investment I see little incentive to upgrade to the a^400

[@gedheaton1415]

Late to the party as usual but now im in the process of upgrading I found your vid Kev, currently A6300 ,yesterday was 6600 today im 6400 and confused haha, I think I can get the 6400 and with a few more ££ the sigma 16mm f1.4 so Im leaning that way, Thoughts Kevin or anyone.

[@KevinRossRN]

I'm still using the 6400 and loving it. And, the 16mm is also still pretty much welded to my camera, 😀 IBIS in the 6600 is great to help with any micro jitters with handheld. I won't say it doesn't help, it's just that the Sony IBIS isn't that great. But the Auto focus is on point. What are you mostly filming?

[@gedheaton1415]

@@KevinRossRN Thanks for taking the time to reply, tbh Kevin its mainly(at the moment) for stills ,but I do intend to start filming my days out in the hill/mountains,wild camping,kayaking etc,nothing tech or the like just a simple basic travel log.

[@KevinRossRN]

Well I have used this on the move. Without IBIS and a non stabilized lens, there are a few tricks to keeping your footage as smooth as possible. OSS lenses do help though, but are a bit more expensive.

[@mannyluches]

Love that intro song👌🏽

[@KevinRossRN]

Much appreciated friend.

[@The9to5Dropouts]

One thing I don't think was mentioned enough was the battery life. The battery on the a6400 literally last only 30-45 min when shooting. The new Z battery on the a6600 is well worth it.

[@KevinRossRN]

Yes, depending on your shooting needs, the Z battery is definitely a bit leg up. I would agree.

[@adirakessler235]

If you're 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒓𝒚𝒊𝒏𝒈 to stabilize your camera [manually] -- by walking with your knees bent and using a gimbal -- then no, you won't see much difference. However, if you bend your knees (a little) and use a gimbal (or maybe even a Steadicam) then you can definitely see a difference. I think the IBIS is a game-changer if you want buttery-smooth footage.

[@KevinRossRN]

IBIS definitely helps, but to your point, when it comes to a non-stabilized sensor, then it takes a little extra work. In this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fGSkp4CDa6d0oqs I made an attempt to use a few handheld techniques along with post production stabilization to get a better result...No perfect, but a pre-production investment in time can go a long way. 👍📷

[@Dimitrios_TC]

If you combine a sony body like alpha 6600 with a gimbal the results will be better comparing with a 6400 with same gimbal?Of course both using kit lens.

[@KevinRossRN]

Appreciate you jumping in here. On a gimbal you'd likely see negligible differences since they're both stabilized. What ate you currently filming with?

[@Dimitrios_TC]

@@KevinRossRN I am currently filming with a Panasonic HC-X900 camcorder. Is not bad but I am looking for a new camera to upgrade. I started do vlogging so is priority for me to have steady footage. Thank for your response btw 👍

[@KevinRossRN]

@@Dimitrios_TC Ha! I used to vlog with a handheld camcorder... It wasn't terrible, but it was definitely limited. The 6600 is actually a better deal now that it has dropped in price. And, it would allow you to invest in more budget friendly no OSS lenses, like the ones from Sigma.

[@shutterthelens4995]

Hi, I'm planning to buy a camera, after watching your video decided between A6400 and A6600, but curious to know which is good between Fujifilm and Sony.

[@KevinRossRN]

What would you mainly be filming?... Mostly photo, video, or both?

[@shutterthelens4995]

@@KevinRossRN mostly photos, travel, outdoor photos. Also suggest whether my decision is good on choosing between A6400 and A6600

[@KevinRossRN]

If you're thinking between 6400 and 6600 along with Fuji, then it seems like you're not focused so much on full frame, and a smaller size overall with the camera body. I do love Sony and I do think they take great photos, however I mostly use these for video and they are just hard to beat for that. However if you're mostly thinking photo, I'd honestly lean toward the Fuji.

[@shutterthelens4995]

@@KevinRossRN Thank you for the confirmation. I'll definitely look out Fuji.

[@KevinRossRN]

Awesome. That XT4 looks pretty great

[@leisum7620]

One of the reasons why I want the a6600 is because of the headphone jack, very useful if you make video where the live sound is important (if you don't have it, you can't know how it is sounding, although you can use an audio recorder)

[@KevinRossRN]

Yes, nice to have the headphone out, but to your point I personally use a Zoom H6 for my pro recording...well, even my in studio recording for you KZbin sometimes as well. But agree that good audio is a priority. What are you currently using?

[@leisum7620]

@@KevinRossRN Thank you for your answer! Oh, I've checked the Zoom H6 now and it looks good. I'm not using any camera right now! I've been wondering for weeks if I prefer the a7iii or the a6600 and I'm going for the a6600, but I totally understand that if you already have some camera from the a6000's serie maybe the change can be not worthy enough

[@KevinRossRN]

Yeah, it's a hard decision, especially now since the A7iii just dropped in price recently...even more confusing. I always recommend staying within a comfortable budget. No point in getting gear just to get it. I think you'd be really happy with the 6600. It's a capable camera for sure. We're going to see some new full frame cameras dropping in the next couple of months that'll likely replace the A7iii, however I think the 6600 is here for at least the next couple of years (in my opinion). I also use the Zoom for a podcast setup, so for me it's a multi-tool. Anyway, stoked for you and hope you get a lot of joy out of the setup you choose. 📷

[@Asianadian]

I’m planning to buy this, but Is it still worth it if i get it right now?

[@KevinRossRN]

You’re buying the 6400? And what are you mostly filming?

[@Asianadian]

@@KevinRossRN yes the 6400 for DIY videos

[@KevinRossRN]

I still use this camera everyday. I would say that if you’re doing handheld work then you’d want a stabilized lens, but if you’re locked off on a tripod or something similar, then it’s great.

[@Asianadian]

@@KevinRossRN yes it is going to be on a tripod and the 16-50mm f3.5 kit lens is oss, that is all im going to use for now then the next plan is to invest on sigma16mm f1.4

[@KevinRossRN]

Gotcha 👍 It really is a great camera for the money. I’m actually about to record a video with it here in about an hour, so I definitely recommend it. 📸

[@hungrydickens]

Hello...I'm buying the 6400 but I don't know whether to buy body only with an aftermarket like Sigma or with the kit lens? Thanks

[@KevinRossRN]

Which kit lens is it bundled with, the 16-50?

[@hungrydickens]

@@KevinRossRN 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS lens

[@KevinRossRN]

If you're sticking with photography primarily, the 18-135 would be a good starter lens. However, with video, and for a similar price point, the 18-105 f/4 is going to be a better option. Lenses are where you want to make your investment. If kept in good condition they will hold value much more than a camera body will, and not to mention good glass just makes it so much easier to get a good result. I'm still using the a6400 as my primary with no regrets, and it's a little beast of a camera. Always work within your budget and get the best glass you can afford for your shooting situations. I'm more into video, so the 18-105 was not even a question for my use case.

[@KevinRossRN]

Also, I just re-read your original comment about choosing the Sigma. Which one are you considering?

[@hungrydickens]

@@KevinRossRN thanks for your input...I'm new to this... I'm purchasing a camera for vacationing and also special moments with my love ones. I've been researching cameras for about 3 weeks. I narrowed it down between the Sony 6600 and a6400, I came across your video and my final decision is the a6400. I seen a youtube video on the Sigma lenses so I'm still learning what lenses do what, but i sure appreciate your feedback and you definitely gained a subsriber... 💯 So I'm going to grab the body only and that lense you suggested...Also what brand of lense do you prefer in 18-105mm.

[@neogod29]

You can't sleep on the bigger battery. Not having to worry about battery life is great. Also, for photography, the IBIS is pretty good. Also, no one has talked about this in any video, but on the A6600 you can drop the ISO down to 50. Which is great for bright days. The grip can't be slept on either. I know it's a by product of putting the bigger battery in, but it makes the feel SO much more comfortable.

[@KevinRossRN]

I hear what you're saying... Agree on your points, and especially so if photography is a primary use case, especially at longer focal lengths and if using third party lenses. Not to mention that the price has dropped to 1198 here in the US, which is where it should have started.

[@neogod29]

I'm actually considering taking my a6000 and getting an IR conversion on it. And seeing what I can create with that. I don't see a lot of people shooting in IR.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@neogod29 you are right my friend... I don't see a lot of folks talking about that type of conversion. Interesting though. I may have to do my own research on that 👍

[@cgd1125]

I planned on buying the new A6700 that's coming out next month. I'm newer to wildlife and bird photography and want to upgrade from my A6000. I'm torn now because the new camera doesn't seem to have much improvement over the A6600. I use the Sony 70 to 350mm lens and looking into buying the Sigma 150-600mm lens. Do I need the Ibis or is the OSS enough? I'm trying to figure out if the A6600 or the A6400 would be the best choice. I wish this was easier I find myself so confused the more I research. Any advice is appreciated.

[@KevinRossRN]

With the possibility of a price difference of around 1,000 between the 6700 and 6600, you really have to ask yourself are the features enough because the 6600 is a great body. The nice thing about IBIS is that it allows you to choose non OSS lenses. For the 6400 I really didn’t have issues, but I have the A7IV and I have to say it’s nice being able to grab just about any lens. The OSS plus the IBIS is really nice to have.

[@cgd1125]

That's my thinking. If there isn't a huge difference I would rather put the money toward the lens. Thank you.

[@KevinRossRN]

Exactly. Another good lens or two in your kit is certainly nice to have.

[@luanmaia]

I want with 6600 as its for business and the cash difference was not a big deal but i do agree with you

[@KevinRossRN]

That’s cool. I mean in some areas we’re seeing a few price drops, and the 6600 had been flirting with 200US off the MSRP, which is where it needed to start. I appreciate you following up. Always good to hear what people decide.

[@HridoyKhan-yt2ee]

Sir please tell me who is the best video camera blogging and short film Sony 6600 and Sony A7 III from Bangladesh🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩

[@KevinRossRN]

A couple of questions for you. How often do you think you'll be vlogging and will this be a primary use case more than doing short films. And, have you narrowed down what your budget is... Also, do you currently have a camera setup now that you are using?

[@HridoyKhan-yt2ee]

@@KevinRossRN A7 III this camera my country price 138000 and Sony a 6600 my country price 115000. And my budget 210000

[@KevinRossRN]

@@HridoyKhan-yt2ee So, the A7iii being full frame will offer certain benefits such as low light performance and overall just a slightly different look, but the 6600 is definitely a very good camera with all the same picture profiles as the A7iii. Not sure if you follow the news on these cameras, but I don't think a successor to the 6600 will be out this year, however I do believe a successor to the A7iii will be. In that case we'll all have a less expensive A7iii to purchase, but also a new iteration of this camera in the coming months. Full frame is great for pro level work and something I'm transitioning to this year, but with that comes a bigger investment in lenses. Full frame is just more expensive, usually. These camera bodies are awesome, but the lenses you put on them are more important in relation to the output you're looking for. I don't think you'll be unhappy with the 6600 and this would allow you to get some very good lenses based on your budget.

[@HridoyKhan-yt2ee]

@@KevinRossRN thank you sir

[@KevinRossRN]

@@HridoyKhan-yt2ee My pleasure. Hope I gave a few additional things to think about that will help. Keep me posted on what you decide 👊📸💥

[@cog6627]

Great comparison! made me want the a6400 a tab more but i think i'd still prefer the a6600. I sold my a6500 and was considering either the a6400 and a6600 (oh and the fujifilm x-t3) I think that i would prefer to go all out and just buy the a6600, even though the IBIS in the sony apsc bodies isnt even that good i like the idea of having a larger battery, larger grip, improved autofocus in video and NO DIMMING IN 4k WOOHOOO YEAAAH BABY! but yeah i'll either buy the a6600 or x-t3 for my next camera.

[@KevinRossRN]

That's awesome! And yeah, I agree with those points....not to mention that I believe the 6600 has dropped in price down to 1198 USD (I think it's still at that price), and I think that's where it should have been from the start. Feel free to keep me posted on your decision and what you think. 📸👊

[@cog6627]

@@KevinRossRN I'll be sure to let you know what i end up getting :)

[@KevinRossRN]

@@cog6627 Sweet... 👊

[@cog6627]

@@KevinRossRN ended up getting the fujifilm xt3 with 23mm 1.4 xf lens. Deal was too good to pass up, im going to keep my sony lenses though and get the a6600 as a second camera when it drops in price probably next year :)

[@KevinRossRN]

@@cog6627 That's awesome. Fuji is definitely a camera I would like to experiment with in 2020. I do hope it serves you well... Now go out there and have fun, tell your story 📸👊

[@bagusfamily]

A6400 handheld with sigma 16mm and 30mm thats ok. But if with sigma 56mm and sony 85mm sucks.. I love my a6400

[@KevinRossRN]

The Sigma 16mm is just a really phenomenal lens to beat. Hands down. I'd love to have something around a 12mm to go even wider since the crop factor brings that 16mm to around 24mm equivalent. But, Sigma is doing something right with these Sony E-mount lenses. For the price and what they offer as far as build and features, very, very hard to beat.

[@Planner_lifestyle]

Omg a6400 im still ok. As long the lens optical stabilize . . Thanks for comparison.

[@KevinRossRN]

If you have an OSS (stabilized Lens), use a gimbal for non-stabilized lenses, or lock off your shots on a tripod, I think you'd be good, that is of course depending on your filming style and settings. In my opinion Sony's IBIS just isn't the best right now, and it took me working with the a6500 over these last couple of years to realize it. It's nice to have in some situations, but the bump in price from the a6400 to a6600 doesn't sit well with my workflow.

[@Planner_lifestyle]

Kevin Ross thanks yah! I agree with you. Actually a6400 is my first camera . And im gonna buy this end of september! Thank you for tips. Helps me a lot!

[@KevinRossRN]

@@Planner_lifestyle my pleasure... And all the best with your 6400...it's a great choice.

[@lostinoc3528]

@@KevinRossRN sonys shitty ibis, is as good as lens with oss.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@lostinoc3528 the OSS in my opinion sometimes looks more stable than the IBIS... My two cents though.

[@Jazzmarcel]

Damn!........ Great review that makes perfect sense! Guess I'm gonna get the 6400!😡👊🏾

[@KevinRossRN]

Well I'm glad to be of help...would this be your first Sony camera purchase?

[@Jazzmarcel]

Kevin Ross no, I bought a Sony nex 5 on my tripmto Brazil in 2013! It took them great pics but, the 720 video really sucked! 😂.......now, I am looking for a camera to record gigs and maybe a mini documentary!

[@KevinRossRN]

@@Jazzmarcel Nice! Yes, definitely an overdue upgrade. And a documentary to boot?... Awesome. Keep me posted on what you decide and definitely circle back around on the doc. Excited for you.

[@Jazzmarcel]

Kevin Ross thanks !🙏🏽

[@shikharjais]

Hello! can you tell which camera is better in terms of value for money if I have to do one time investment between Sony a6400 vs Sony a6600. Flipkart price for a6400 is 102490 Rs for 18-135mm lens and price of a6600 with lens is 135000 Rs. Sony a6600 has additional IBIS features + better battery life but doesn't have inbuilt Flash light. So considering IBIS features does Sony a6400 with gimbal will be better option than sony a6600 or not? What do you think which one is better? Sony a6400 with Gimbal or sony a6600? Your timely reply will help me to buy camera as Flipkart sale is ON.

[@KevinRossRN]

So what I will say is that the 6600 will have an advantage with the built in IBIS when it comes to handheld shots, and specifically micro jitters. It’s not the best IBIS, however those minor shakes that occur with close up shorts or even zoomed out shots will benefit from those small movements. Now, walking around hand held is another story. Also, with IBIS it would allow you to purchase less expensive non-stabilized lenses. Although stabilized lenses do help quite a bit. Also it does seem that the 6600 has dropped in price since this video. Can you afford the 6600?

[@shikharjais]

@@KevinRossRNAs of now in India price of sony a6400 is 1400 USD with 18-135mm lens and sony a6600 is at 1800 USD with 18-135mm lens in Flipkart website. Because Sony a6600 advantage of better battery life can be met by additional battery in sony a6400 and regarding extra headphones jack is that it is not so important. So I'm getting little confuse over IBIS features whether I should save 400 USD and buy good gimbal for Sony a6400. What's your final say on this? Because 24 January is the last date of Flipkart sale.

[@KevinRossRN]

Well you’ll never get gimbal quality without a gimbal, so if you want really buttery smooth footage, then a gimbal is the way to go. The 18-135 is a decent lens. It’s better for photos, but it is still a decent video lens. The 6600 and the 6400 would look fairly similar as far as the output of they’re both on a gimbal. I will say as long as you’re fine setting up a gimbal for many of your shoots, then that’s fine. It can get cumbersome at times. The stabilized lenses are really helpful and the 18-135 is stabilized, so you’ll find yourself likely not needing a gimbal for many of your handheld shots.

[@shikharjais]

@@KevinRossRN So what's your final verdict sony a6400 or Sony a6600 based on one time investment. And Is Nikon Z50 better than sony a6400?

[@KevinRossRN]

May, the Nikon in my opinion isn’t better for video. I have a Nikon and it’s great for photo. If you get the 6400 with that lens you should be fine. And with the cost savings you could get that gimbal, or down the road purchase about her stabilized lens. Personally I still use my 6400.

[@slam5]

Now in 2023, I'm very glad that I bought the 6600. There two major reasons why I am glad. One, battery life, I hardly ever run out of battery in a day. Frequently it last me 2 days. Two, IBIS, with so many great lens coming out that has no image stabilization that is better priced. And as a bonus, the grip is so much better than any of the A6 series.

[@KevinRossRN]

Those newer lenses that don’t have OSS are pretty great. I agree.

[@onerugrat]

I can't deal with the battery on the 6400, I have a 6300 and battery life has always been issue, i know the 6400 is supposed to be 15 percent more efficient, still not enough, that is why I would go with the 6600, you can also share batteries if you ever decide to pick up a a7

[@KevinRossRN]

Yep, battery life is definitely going to be better on the 6600, and yes, a battery you can swap with the A7 series. I will also say that even though the Sony OEM batteries are 1080mAh rating, they'll still hold a charge longer than the third party ones that have a higher mAh rating... Are you considering the 6600 for your next purchase?

[@curtisbojorquiz225]

My problem right now, deciding between the a6400 or the a6600. The struggle is real😂. Question, is the IBIS mainly used for videos or does it aid in photography as well?

[@KevinRossRN]

IBIS, especially Sony's IBIS (because it's not the greatest), is better utilized in photography. You certainly want your video stable, of course, but there are so many ways to stabilize handheld video even without a stabilized lens. The improved battery life would be nice, and I know would have been considered for the a6400 if not for the slated release of the a6500 successor....Gotta hold something back for that extra $500USD. Still no regrets on my a6400 purchase. I just filmed with it today doing another review of the a6400 paired with the Sigma 16mm. It's a little beast of a camera. What are you currently using?

[@pedroblancou]

I have the 18 - 105mm and and the internal stabilization of this lens is for photography only. Not for video. : (

[@KevinRossRN]

Which camera body are you using this on? I'd be interested in hearing your perspective and use case.

[@pedroblancou]

@@KevinRossRN i have an A6300 and some stabilized lenses. It non stabilizes in video mode. Do you appreciate any difference when using them with the A6400?

[@KevinRossRN]

@@pedroblancou Have you tried updating your firmware of the lens? The 18-105 does have a firmware update available. I just did a video on the 6400 and 18-105, and have to say that in my use case it's sometimes better than the IBIS in the a6500. But yes, OSS lenses and IBIS are much better appreciated with photography... However, I get more use out of this lens with video than photo... That is in how I use it. Definitely check Sony's website for the 18-105 and the firmware. It may offer you some more benefit.

[@pedroblancou]

@@KevinRossRNThe 18-105mm or 35mm or my Sony 50mm don´t have any firmware available.: (

[@KevinRossRN]

@@pedroblancou so no firmware updates found or is the lens already up to date? This is where I found mine for the 18-105: www.sony.com/electronics/support/lenses-e-mount-lenses/selp18105g/downloads

[@verrettproductions3487]

I keep changing my mind. The only reason I keep going back to the a6600 is because of the battery last longer and I have the A7iii.

[@KevinRossRN]

What are you mostly wanting to use it for?

[@verrettproductions3487]

@@KevinRossRN wedding video B camera to use mainly on a gimbal

[@KevinRossRN]

Gotcha. Yeah I’d say that extra battery life would be the way to go so you don’t have to rebalance while changing out a battery.

[@DIGITALMIND63]

All good points but the battery life on the 6400 is terrible. As a photographer, IBIS is very important as you mentioned. If you're a videographer the headphone jack and eye auto focus in video is a big addition. So in conclusion, I think the things I mentioned justifies purchasing the A6600. If you already have the 6400 like yourself then sticking with it makes sense.

[@KevinRossRN]

Very good points my friend. And since it’s been awhile from when I did this video, there are still more options to get the 6600 at a price that’s closer to where it should have started. If full frame isn’t needed and the Sony ecosystem is what you wanted, then the 6600 is a great choice.

[@totoroutes5389]

from 7:50, audio. ever watch the channel AngryPhotographer?

[@KevinRossRN]

The Angry Photographer?....No, but I'll look that channel up right now... 👊📸

[@robbquinnimaging4321]

@@KevinRossRN Dont!

[@KevinRossRN]

@@robbquinnimaging4321 not a fan eh?

[@robbquinnimaging4321]

Kevin Ross nope. The fact he uses photographer in his title is nothing short of blasphemous!

[@KevinRossRN]

@@robbquinnimaging4321 understood my friend 👊 appreciate your time 📸 What are you currently filming with? ... Just out of curiosity.

[@cj64films]

The a6400 with the 18-105 all the way the wide end looked better than the a6500 with the Sigma 16

[@KevinRossRN]

Interesting input here. The 18-105 definitely has a different "look" than the Sigma... And differences in the 6400 and 6500 focus and color science are negligible, although there is still enough of a difference between them when it comes down to what I see in post. What are you currently filming with?

[@cj64films]

@@KevinRossRN Shooting with the Sony a6300! & i own the 18-105, Sony 35mm F1.8 and the Helios 44-2 F2 58mm and a vintage Canon 50mm FD F1.4

[@KevinRossRN]

Dang! Very nice. I'd really like to invest in some vintage lenses, especially when we can all get out of our own backyards. That 6300 is plenty capable as I'm sure you're aware. Appreciate you circling back around.

[@cj64films]

Kevin Ross You definitely should! I love the unique looks they have! I actually just bought the a6400 today! Not sure if I’m going to sell the a6300 or keep it as a backup

[@PratapO7O1]

6:52 I think Dynamic range of a6500 is slightly better

[@KevinRossRN]

Appreciate your feedback... You currently in the market for a new camera?

[@WhoIsJonHarris]

Dang good review. You sold the 6400 for me! Subbed.

[@KevinRossRN]

Thanks! Happy to help. Are you currently a Sony user? Looking to get into the ecosystem?

[@WhoIsJonHarris]

@@KevinRossRN no I mean you actually sold it. Just bought the 6400 after watching a couple of your vids. Stellar work.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@WhoIsJonHarris well hot dang! Welcome to Sony my friend. Really happy to help... Seriously. I hope you create some awesome stuff. Keep me posted if you feel inclined. I get excited for everyone venturing into new gear.

[@neogod29]

The stabilization test you did was inaccurate. The way it should've been done was, both cameras with a stabilized lens against each other, and then bot cameras without a stabilized lens against each other, that way people can actually make an informed decision. I don't know if paring a stabilized lens with the stabilized body works better than with just the stabilized lens. What I do know is having a stabilized body without a stabilized lens works better than no stabilization at all, but other people should also see that.

[@KevinRossRN]

Appreciate the feedback. I actually did another video using the 6400 and 6500, but did add the kit lens and the 18-105 on them... Both OSS. The footage was a bit blown out as I was filming in the middle of the day. Anyway, I think the OSS in the lens works better than just the straight IBIS for video. Like I've said I love these cameras, and the auto focus is just incredible, but Sony really needs to think about improving the IBIS in these cameras, especially with Tamron and Sigma lenses being so good for the price and features.

[@neogod29]

Yeah they do need to improve their IBIS. I hear Panasonic is killing it with theirs, and the Canon R5 is also gonna have it. The next couple years might swing back to Canon dominance. Which would be good because that should force Sony to not hold back like they did this generation.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@neogod29 yeah, I'm excited about the R5 announcement strictly because it should push Sony and the other manufacturers to improve upon the capabilities of these cameras.

[@hhdevis]

a7III or A6400 ?

[@KevinRossRN]

What would be your primary use case?

[@hhdevis]

@@KevinRossRN Full web , photograhy and video real state

[@KevinRossRN]

@@hhdevis A7iii would be my suggestion. The initial investment would be more, but if you're thinking about real estate I just think the full frame option is something you'll want. Also, the IBIS in the A7iii is going to give you that edge for photo.

[@aatifahmad]

You have compared 6500 with 6400 in the video but the title says 6600. I think this is not fair if you really want people to follow you

[@BackTo1969]

Lets get back to the studio? Lets get back to the house more like smdh

[@KevinRossRN]

I know, right? What was I thinking? 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️😏

[@TJuice1986]

This video helped me realize that buying the a6400 was indeed the right decision. Seeing that an OSS lens on the a6400 actually looked better then the a6500’s ibis made me feel better about it too. To be honest, I couldn’t see a difference between the a6400 with the sigma 16 and the a6500 with the same lens with ibis. You’ve got a new subscriber here, keep up the good work!

[@KevinRossRN]

With all this footage I have between the two, I didn't (initially) realize how good these OSS lenses really are compared to just the IBIS. In some handheld situations it's better 🤷‍♂️ Really appreciate that brother 👊🤘

[@joshmcdzz6925]

1. IBIS is NOT GOOD in the long run. The lube used for the axis to stabilize the sensor will eventually spill on the shutter within the camera which is a potential risk to shortening its lifespan. 2. OSS is far more stable than IBIS 3. a6600 excels in low light among all the aps-c series from sony but one of the worst when it comes to color depth and dynamic range. 4. For its price point, I will rather go for an a7iii. a6600 is just a marketing pun for sony.

[@KevinRossRN]

Really appreciate you weighing in here... And I agree that the A7iii would be a better investment if you're willing (or able) to push the budget up a bit. And I also agree that the OSS is much more reliable than the IBIS in these cameras.

[@five18audio]

A6600 I bought mines for 1100 on discount just put 200 more in 2020 no use buying old products it’s just a matter of couple dollArs more

[@KevinRossRN]

When it dropped to 1,100 I felt that this is is the price it should have been originally. Glad you were able to snag it at that price. 📸👍

[@five18audio]

Yes I got it from adorama it’s a open box version just that the box was opened the price was dropped I was not gonna buy it at 1400 or 1300 but at 1100 the a6400 is still at 998 brand new I made the right decision at putting 200 more and snag the a6600 I need to add a gimbal to this well I’m now starting my channel up

[@KevinRossRN]

@@five18audio That's awesome that you were able to get it at that price... And I've ordered plenty from Adorama. Their "used" and open box items are usually pretty good deals. What kind of content are you looking to create?

[@joshuathomas4934]

I still recommend people to get an a6000 and spend the saved money on glass. Thought the 6400 and 6600 are definitely better cameras, for more hobbyists, the a6000 will net the exact same results unless you are into video.

[@KevinRossRN]

There you go. The investment in glass can really level up the shot. Appreciate you popping by on this one. 🤘

[@KurruptedDataYouT]

As a A6400 user, the 1080p just looks like garbage. 4k looks amazing though.

[@KevinRossRN]

I do try to film in 4K any chance I get. However there are certainly picture profiles and settings that can help that 1080p, but yes, I try to hang in the 4K realm as much as possible.

[@ananthums8970]

I wud still prefer a6600 bcoz of the ibis and battery

[@KevinRossRN]

That’s cool. It’s still an amazing camera. And every now and again the deals on it do pop up.

[@ananthums8970]

@@KevinRossRN yes ik ❤️

[@KevinRossRN]

Keep me posted on what you decide.

[@ananthums8970]

@@KevinRossRN yes sure man ... I think I will buy a6600 with sigma 56 f1.4 within 1 month

[@KevinRossRN]

Alright! Killer combo.

[@cefgil3905]

Why do youtubers say it’s great to see you??? They could say it’s great have you here,

[@KevinRossRN]

I like to say both... Depending on the mood, but the biggest reason for me is that I treat that camera as if I'm talking to someone 1:1. Great to have you here in the comments friend. 👊📸

[@cefgil3905]

Kevin Ross on another note, I should have mentioned that it was a good comparison video! And thanks! 🙏 😃

[@KevinRossRN]

@@cefgil3905 well I definitely appreciate you taking the time to let me know. Best of luck on your continued research and feel free to keep me posted on what you decide. 📸😁

[@cefgil3905]

Kevin Ross I think I’m leaning towards a a7iii but I still have some time. I’m overseas and I can’t by a camera here so who knows maybe Sony will come out with a a7iiis or a7iv. I’m looking for something to record videos with. Not really sure what I want to record yet! Lol! I’m guessing it will be something silly and even slightly idiotic but it’s all about the process and enjoyment with me.

[@KevinRossRN]

@@cefgil3905 Sony will drop that A7siii, likely in April, according to the rumors and it'll be north of 3,000 USD... However I also think the A7iv will be released as well at around the price point of the A7iii's initial price of 2,000 USD. The A7iii is currently at a 200 discount, and will likely be closer to 1,500 soon with an impending A7iv release. The a6600 will hover around 1,100 and 6400 likely 799...my theories anyway. The A7iii is also full frame compared to APS-C (crop sensor) of the 6400 AND 6600. Full frame has some advantages, although lenses could be a bit more vs. the lenses with APS-C. Either way, the Sony lineup is nice, and only going to get better in the next couple of months.

[@LAIBAK187]

I don’t know had the 64 want the 66 now I love the 64 tho ummmm

[@KevinRossRN]

So you currently have the 6400?

[@LAIBAK187]

@@KevinRossRN yes i do

[@KevinRossRN]

So do you want a second body, or to replace the 6400? What are you mostly filming?

[@LAIBAK187]

@@KevinRossRN music videos mainly

[@KevinRossRN]

So do you want the in body image stabilization?

[@phillgriffith]

Stopped watching when you said you do not have an A6600 to compare.

[@letsfindout6587]

The only thing stopping me from getting the a6600 is the lack of a flash

[@KevinRossRN]

That's actually something I didn't mention. I've typically used speed lights in my workflow, but hey, there are still ways to bounce light with a built-in flash. I suppose Sony figured since they were marketing this to "professionals" that this wouldn't be a missed feature. Do you currently have a Sony, or looking to get into the ecosystem?

[@nafastcargo7190]

a6600 is a minor change and the price is high. Keep your a 6400 and better wait more advance 6 series later

[@KevinRossRN]

It’ll be interesting to see what happens to the a6xxx line up now that Sony is entering the compact full frame space. I think APS-C will still exist, but I foresee some consolidation in all of these options.

[@muhammadfathi960]

guys, not matter new camera you bought, the lens is more important ...

[@KevinRossRN]

Yes, you can have a really good camera, but without good glass, you're not really getting the full benefit of it. Do you currently use Sony?

[@muhammadfathi960]

Ya. i have one.. but i accidentally sell to other , a6400 , i realize im not buy good lens for that.. so the output it just not satisfied because i often compere "tech" with other new camera, then i realize that person doing good job use my ex-a6400, with proper lens... if someone dont know the overall function of the camera, and keep compare the brand vs brand without knowing what that function of button we really use in real life , so it ill waste more money bcos use it like smartphones camera. 😂,

[@KevinRossRN]

@@muhammadfathi960 I hear what you're saying. When I first started I didn't realize the difference a good lens could make. I think it's an honest mistake that many do make. And of course learning how to use the camera over time, which just takes trial and error, and experimentation. I appreciate you popping in over here.

[@muhammadfathi960]

Kevin Ross ya. experience 😂, that the lesson i never forget

[@KevinRossRN]

@@muhammadfathi960 Ha! Keep on experimenting my friend 📸👍

[@genghis2510]

If Mr. Warren Buffet will answer: NONE.

[@KevinRossRN]

Respect to W. Buffet 👊📸

[@petebeltran6899]

I'm getting Sony a6400 which is cheaper than the a6600.

[@KevinRossRN]

Significantly cheaper in my opinion. I really don't think you'll be disappointed. You shooting mostly photos, video, or both?

[@VnutrenniyMir]

Благодарим!

[@Terrorsoul023]

which picture profile did you use on 6400 for the test footage?? thanks

[@KevinRossRN]

I wanted to make sure that both cameras had the same profile, so Cine 4...I usually film in HLG 2 on the 6400.

[@Terrorsoul023]

@@KevinRossRN im using a .cube lut , do you recommend me using the cine 4? or which profile? thanks for answering

[@KevinRossRN]

If you have the 6400, then I'd say experiment with HLG... Like I said I prefer HLG 2 because it gives me good dynamic range with less noise, which HLG will sometimes give you more noise in your footage if your lighting isn't dialed in. I did do a video on my studio camera settings.