Thank you for a great video, I've been stuck between the Canon R7 and the Sony a6700 and I'm leaning more towards the a6700
@ScentSince20108 ай бұрын
Running a s-30mm14 and can’t get enough of this thing
@KyleWattsTV8 ай бұрын
Love the sigma 30mm!
@AlexandreeSantossАй бұрын
I just got my Sony a6700, and bought the Sigma 30mm f1.4 a few weeks ago, so I am super excited to start using both soon! 🤩
@TheIfeomaa6 ай бұрын
Would you say the a6700 does pretty well in low light? At least compared to a full frame? I want a camera that does well on low light but can’t afford a full frame
@Splatter-dw7ws4 ай бұрын
Same question
@LoksPH2 ай бұрын
With the right setting, even a6000 can work pretty well in low light
@0six06062 ай бұрын
It has a backlit sensor, its hard to explain so in short terms it literally means it does very well in low light
@sergiolandz6056Ай бұрын
if you can edit, any shot in low light is easy to make it look good.
@Solaxe17 күн бұрын
even my 6500 does well in low light, just get a light prime and denoise in some editing software
@JayWithDaBee4 ай бұрын
Just got my a6700 this last weekend with the kit lens really enjoy it but ordered the tamron 17-70 over the sigma 18-50 i couldnt pass up on the extra 20 mm 😅
@KyleWattsTV4 ай бұрын
@@JayWithDaBee can’t really go wrong with either but the tamron is also stabilized so that’s a bonus
@tanner.quintero9 ай бұрын
Hi there, I saw your video of the 18-50 Sigma, and I would like to ask, how u compare this one with Sigma in "A-Focus" and Quality vs this Tamron? And have u ever tested the 16-55 from Sony?
@parkasat6 ай бұрын
Curious which of the two you ended up going with?
@yossiakerman45966 ай бұрын
Curious which of the two you ended up going with?
@KyleWattsTV6 ай бұрын
I haven’t used the Sony 16-55 so I can’t really compare them. But the sigma 18-50 f2.8 is a really sharp and solid lens. If you asking about the tamron 17-70 f2.8 then I’d have to say it’s very similar to the sigma but it has internal stabilization and a more versatile focal range. I really like both of these lenses just depends on which one fits your needs better
@wandimuliawangsa375321 күн бұрын
Hi, good video, I want to ask, can this Sony 6700 be used in the studio for flash photography, such as for product and model photos, can you use a trigger to activate studio flash lights in general, thank you.
@viralmozy5 ай бұрын
How do i edit in Lightroom “Tutorial “?. You’re editing is insane 👌🏾
@adorschnerj75339 ай бұрын
Pics turned out great!!
@0xggbrnr6 ай бұрын
What’s happening when you show the more exposed version of the photo you took? Did the camera take that, or is that something from post production?
6 ай бұрын
I know... he takes them really dark then he turns up the shadows!! WTF??!
@KyleWattsTV6 ай бұрын
I usually expose to the highlights to preserve them and then edit the photos in Lightroom. If I wasn’t planning on editing them then I would normally expose to +0.0 in camera.
@kamilwisniewski13004 ай бұрын
4:49 how many photos per second? I have read that 11 frames per second but it does not look like this
@KyleWattsTV4 ай бұрын
@@kamilwisniewski1300 I believe it is 11fps with a max of 59 raw in a row
@nayemkhan-mc6xe18 күн бұрын
I use sony a6700 with sony 18-135 lens but it doesn't get sacrified. Will it get sacrified if I use any lens? Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 Which one should I use?
@ickoisnotgoing9 ай бұрын
Photos are so crisp! May I ask what camera are you using for the POV and are you using a chest mount/harness? Thank you!
@KyleWattsTV9 ай бұрын
Yes it’s a chest mount harness and it’s the DJI Osmo action 4 camera.
@mxrcusirl6 ай бұрын
great video kyle!
@rahilhasan90958 күн бұрын
is the vignette from edit or from the lens
@KyleWattsTV7 күн бұрын
The edit. I like using radial masks
@Anhnguyen-fl8qy8 ай бұрын
I have Sony a6000. Would you recommend this Tamron 17-70 or Sigma 24-70 Art? thank you so much!
@KyleWattsTV8 ай бұрын
Both great lenses. The tamron has stabilization on it so that’s a plus. If you plan to move to full frame at some point go with the sigma. Just a heads up though, the sigma is a pretty heavy lens and makes it pretty front heavy with the a6xxx cameras
@Anhnguyen-fl8qy8 ай бұрын
@@KyleWattsTV Thank you for your response. I have been enjoying a6000 pretty much so I’ll go with Tamron. Subscribed!
@TheVideosofJulien9 ай бұрын
debating if I should get the 70-200 now or wait until they release one for APSC - what are you thoughts?
@KyleWattsTV9 ай бұрын
I doubt they would make a 70-200 specifically for apsc. There is a sigma 70-200 they came out recently that’s about half the price though
@alessioragghianti44625 ай бұрын
Thank for the video kyle. Can you tell me if the stabilization of the cam and of the lens (tamron 17-70) is enought to stabilized a video? Of is better to buy a gimbal. Thank!
@KyleWattsTV5 ай бұрын
@@alessioragghianti4462 it’s really good. I barely use my gimbal anymore. Obviously in some situations you might need a gimbal but that would be for more extreme situations or when you need it to be very stabilized
@jonguitarman20039 ай бұрын
Great video! Where did you get those labeled lens caps? I’ve seen them in several videos and I think you mentioned them in one but I can’t seem to find it.
@@KyleWattsTV man those fireworks seemed like gun fire. Man I want that 70-200 lol 😂 great room patio. Less than a week bro!
@AndrisRockabillytravelle-mz6hf9 ай бұрын
A6700 with tamron 35-150 f2-2.8 pls 😁
@KyleWattsTV9 ай бұрын
I no longer have that tamron lens but it would be a great combo with the a6700! I made this video with that lens and the a7iv though kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZeQqo2khNCihNE
@Insanenobody9 ай бұрын
Hello, what camera wrist strap is that? Looking for one for my a6700 😬
@KyleWattsTV9 ай бұрын
Peak design wrist strap
@Insanenobody9 ай бұрын
@@KyleWattsTV got it, thanks!
@babyboy19712 ай бұрын
Is the EVF any good?
@KyleWattsTV2 ай бұрын
@@babyboy1971 it’s not the best Sony has but it’s still pretty good. Some people have added a larger silicone to the evf to make it better.
@TT-rl4su2 ай бұрын
I have Sony 18-105mm f4, Sony 10-18mm f4. Would you get- Sony 16-55mm f2.8 $700 vs Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 $450? + Pair one of the above with Viltrox 75mm 1.2 vs Sigma 56mm f1.4? I currently use a6500. I do portraits (Semi-pro) and landscape (hobby). Please advise. THANKS!!!!!
@o.k.76735 ай бұрын
Great video! Any thoughts on pairing the a6700 with a 24-70mm FF? Because I am a notorious zoomer, I think I’d love this length, especially considering the crop factor but I have no options to test it before buying it first 🫠
@KyleWattsTV5 ай бұрын
@@o.k.7673 yes. It’s a great combo. I have the sigma 24-70 and I love this focal range on an apsc camera. I did a video with it on the a6400 in New Orleans and the photos speak for themselves
@o.k.76735 ай бұрын
I ran to New Orleans! Amazing video - so helpful in my decision making! Loved to see the photos beside the actual distances. It’s exactly what I am looking for! Thx
@RC-Cinema5 ай бұрын
great stuff and pics! how did you find it with high iso? i noticed your iso was generally quite low
@SlammedCanada7 ай бұрын
Any issues with video? Seeing reports of problem with in body ibis and the VC in the lens. Would I be better off with the sigma 18-50?
@KyleWattsTV7 ай бұрын
No issues that I’ve had. The sigma is also really nice too though
@0xggbrnr6 ай бұрын
Could I use this to do talking head stuff like vlogging or streaming myself talk?
@Chris-wv8cn2 ай бұрын
Is the photo quality really the same as the Sony A7 IV? Or are you just advertising for Sony? Because I’m not sure which one I should buy, it’s mainly for daytime and sports events. "Because I do see a bit more noise when I zoom in.
@KyleWattsTV2 ай бұрын
@@Chris-wv8cn it’s basically a cropped a7iv but with better autofocus (the new ai autofocus system) and less expensive. I really like this camera a lot for photography. My friend Curtis just did his one year review on it and his photos speak for themselves. kzbin.info/www/bejne/onq0p6KihZ5qfK8si=1hnlkIRDvbe9DVD4
@Chris-wv8cn2 ай бұрын
@ So you would also use it for sports photography. I'm going to watch his video. Thank you
@KyleWattsTV2 ай бұрын
@ yea. Mainly you just want to be shooting in a higher shutter speed when doing sports. I’ve shot basketball with it and I does pretty good. The new AI AF is the same system from the a9iii
@NoimusSalam9 ай бұрын
Is it safe to assume you can use a lot of the Sony full frame lenses on APS-C bodies? I want to start my photography journey with an APS-C body and lens, then gradually move on to full frame if I don’t lose interest in the hobby.
@KyleWattsTV9 ай бұрын
The full frame lenses will always work on the apsc bodies. Some apsc lenses can work on full frame bodies with some post cropping or using the super35 settings.
@knightfallstudios62539 ай бұрын
Was this Chinese new year celebration?
@KyleWattsTV9 ай бұрын
Yup!
@JoshConnectMedia8 ай бұрын
@@KyleWattsTV😇
@bigjay63638 ай бұрын
Would it be worth upgrading from the ZV E10?
@KyleWattsTV8 ай бұрын
It’s a pretty big upgrade especially in the video side of the camera. Also the autofocus is straight from Sonys new $6,000 camera and it’s really good
@KatzHartz5 ай бұрын
Did you shoot in RAW or JPEGS? If RAW, do your presets work on JPEGS?
@KyleWattsTV5 ай бұрын
@@KatzHartz I mostly shoot raw because I know I’m going to edit them. You can add presets to jpegs but you might have to adjust the intensity of the preset. The more heavy lifting the preset has to do the more likely that jpegs will start to fall apart
@mikevfx71087 ай бұрын
How is the bokeh of this? I like this type of lens but i like sigma 56 1.4 too for portrait. But this tamron is all in one lens with 2.8
@KyleWattsTV7 ай бұрын
It’s pretty good. It’s definitely not gonna be an obvious as that f1.4 lens
@DJDELLANNIE7 ай бұрын
What event is this is NYC I live here never seen this lol im so lost lol
@KyleWattsTV7 ай бұрын
Chinese new year
@artbynaition12789 ай бұрын
How is this camera with flash photography
@mirrormirage05 ай бұрын
Thank you so much!
@Mo.W4SEL8 ай бұрын
Sigma 18-50 or 30mm ??
@KyleWattsTV8 ай бұрын
I would go for the 18-50 for versatility but that 30 is a great lens as well
@rzrdaze6 ай бұрын
Great video. I have a 6400 im thinking of upgrading from. I think its going to be worth it. Already have that Tamron and a F4 70-200. Yea, the 2.8 is better but still an awesome lens on the aps-c body. Just ordered the 10-18 Sigma with believe will be great on this as well. I tried doing video on the 6400 but with no IBIS its a real chore to try to get useful video. Thats a big reason I want this. Thanks
@KyleWattsTV6 ай бұрын
@@rzrdaze yea. The a6700 is a pretty big upgrade having the ibis. It’s actually probably the most stable looking footage in active stabilization than any of the other Sony cameras in active. I just got the sigma 10-18 as well and it’s so good
@sarabi14399 ай бұрын
Does Lightroom support RAW files?
@KyleWattsTV9 ай бұрын
Yes
@CinematicNomadic2 ай бұрын
A6700 or A7iii in 2024?
@KyleWattsTV2 ай бұрын
@@CinematicNomadic a6700
@parkertechsavvy9 ай бұрын
Nice camera
@steampunk32812 ай бұрын
Like number 400. Nice work man!
@you7tube8774 ай бұрын
Looks orange , why?
@7sonero72 ай бұрын
I see it . Looks shifted more to red after post processing.