SONY A7SIII Extreme SLOW MOTION in 1,000 FPS

[@vicluistudio3320]

For those who just want to jump to the METHOD : Slow down the footage, then choose optical flow (as he mentioned at 6:56). DONE! You can do the same thing in Premiere : command R, slow it down at any percentage you want, then choose optical flow at the same window. But, you need to know that there is limitation of course. 1) it doesn't always work that naturally, you can see some weird "glitch", especially when the moving object is layering in front of a complicated background. 2) You want to sharpen the shutter speed when recording at less than 180degree, otherwise there will be too much motion blur after you slow it down

[@syedarmaghanhassan4652]

lol- thanks!

[@marshallandroxy]

Jesus - thanks. I hate these videos that could be 60 seconds long but they gotta streeeeeetch it the eff out.

[@dutchgroundmedia]

The most important trick / rule to get good results is to shoot with a very high shutterspeed. (1/400, 1/800 or even higher if possible). You want to get as less motion blur as possible in each frame. This way the optical flow or flame blending will give best results.

[@cognitoooo]

Make sure to: 1)Have LOTS of Light 2)set your shutter speed extremely high to help eliminate video ripping and better super slo mo results (2000shutter speed for 1000fps). Try to avoid hot spots of light as those are the culprits. 3)Increase aperature to at least 2.8.

[@AB-nb9nk]

Why have a low aperture?

[@cognitoooo]

@@AB-nb9nk I wrote increase to 2.8 as I don't think it's good to shoot under that for slow motion. It's pretty difficult to shoot an acceptable shot at under 2.8 when the thing you are capturing is moving faster then you can actually see. If you do hit those marks at 2.8 or under it can look unbelievable but for that get a robot. Just keep hot spots, subjects glasses reflections and LENS Flares out of slow motion footage you intend to fake. It will rip and be unusable

[@AB-nb9nk]

@@cognitoooo great advice man thank you! I was thinking about getting a CPL, would that be helpful to limit those reflections?

[@cognitoooo]

@@AB-nb9nk it may be helpful as antiglare does seem like a way to counter reflections but at the same time you might giving yourself more problems. You are losing light now and so that may cause you to make adjustments to your image that you don't want to make. There is honestly so much to say about this. I recommend being locked off, never allow a flare or a light source to enter or leave the frame. Just let the action happen and trust me it will look cool even though you just feel like you are pushing record sometimes. Sony A7S III would be pretty good at faking slow motion due to low light strength and 120FPS 4K@16 or 12 bit possible The less movement the better for faking slow motion. It's really hard to get right for client work.

[@AB-nb9nk]

@@cognitoooo yeah I was thinking about using this in real world scenarios. I’m a videographer for a football team. It seems like this would not be the best use for a shot with variable outcomes and not in a controlled lighting environment.

[@Lauri_Hamalainen]

Thanks for the tut ! One thing thou (for you as a videomaker)4:33 explosion on the mic low end. remember to use highpass filter and take out everything letsay under 90Hz. so you don´t get plosives. Ofc. you wont be able to hear those in a consumer/ home studio speakers, but in professional mixin studio my speakers totally reproduce the impact below 40Hz.. :D -- but that´s just a tip!. thanks again! -L

[@Zoomin_ASMR]

finally un roman care stie cu ele :) spor la treaba

[@arhon888]

Wow!! that was amazing. When you said 'there is this special trick you can do...' I was expecting it to look kinda ok, but ready to be a little underwhelmed, just because I didn't really think it was possible. But the end result looked insane! Thank you for sharing.

[@andyelement]

Mate! Been hunting for this trick for over a year! Thank you

[@Bo_Hazem]

This is amazing! I use DaVinci Resolve as well, will play around other speeds like 480fps and so and try many shots to nail it. Thanks a lot!

[@Dagrepublic]

Absolutely DOPE

[@lancealbon46]

Mad skills man, man skills!

[@mylittlefamilynatureadvent4719]

Love it! thank you new subscriber here. just bought my a7siii

[@FindYourVentur]

Great trick! Will definitely try this out sometime.

[@AlexDon]

Great, show me the results when you do 🤘🔥

[@TheJ_G]

Great video and wonderful results! I wish I didn’t take 7 minutes to confirm it was just using optical flow in post.

[@catmiser]

This is a great way. I can't wait to try this

[@Kernalpanik]

I like that warping effect

[@alexdeegames]

Amazing trick bro! Thanks!

[@TheFilmmakersWorkshop]

Great tutorial. Gave me the answer and info I need to fake some 1000fps.

[@RollingRoutes]

This inspired me to try some slo mo in my travel vlogs!!

[@tamaspoosz8630]

Each one of your clips makes me wanna get into film making also besides programming :D

[@ArtemGalkin]

Man! you are genius

[@AlexDon]

Thank you 🙏🙏

[@lukastemberger]

Thanks for the vid. Good luck to Roxen! :)

[@PaulMoldovan]

Doooope!! I have to try this in Premiere Pro and see if it works as good as Davinci

[@productionznetwork]

Looking too easy 🤔

[@lovefirst6157]

how do you do it in davinci

[@AlexDon]

In resolve this is a new feature, speed warp does the difference 💪

[@coltonmulligan2550]

@Paul Any success in doing this in Premiere?

[@PaulMoldovan]

@@coltonmulligan2550 no. But I successfully switched to DaVinci 😂. You have optical flow in Premiere, but I don't know any Speed Warp option. And for fast moving subjects Optical Flow is not good enough by itself

[@outdoorsinontario3037]

well done!!!

[@MattRandallProductions]

This ONLY works in Davinci Resolve and yes you need the paid Studio version as the Speed Warp setting in the free version has a watermark. It works fantastic though! Does not work anywhere near this good in Premiere Pro or After Effects but magic in Davinci

[@julianpizzicotti1435]

Great tutorial! ! One question, how shutter speed used when filming in 240fps? Thanks!

[@Arri.]

Double 1/400 or more is better less motion blur the better your results

[@julianpizzicotti1435]

@@Arri. thanks!!

[@jeanmarc_nkb]

Lens?

[@liquaard2824]

But the best workaround i suggest is to import the clip into after effects, use the plugin called twixter pro for more accurate slow mo than optical flow, then after everything is done. Export the file as prores to be edited in another video editing software ✨️

[@kaizen5023]

Twixtor software is good, but it really depends on what kind of footage it is and you have to spend a lot of time playing with settings to avoid the weird warpy look.

[@liquaard2824]

@@kaizen5023 only 1 setting : increase the shutter speed

[@OlmoBlancoCountertenor]

Which is the best shutter speed in the camera to do this trick? Thanks for the video!

[@AlexDon]

Between 4000-8000

[@pjtavera]

Cheers bro!

[@SkinnyWasHere]

this is epic!

[@AlexDon]

Thank you 🙏🙏

[@bronzehawk3646]

As a Canon user id like to ask the community, should I get a Sony for 240fps as canon have only 120fps? Is it worth it? I like canon better but sadly it dosent have 240fps ofcourse I wouldn't use 240fps most of the time only rarely but if I gotta buy a expensive camera it should have all the features I require so should I. Buy Sony for it's 240fps or stick with canon

[@danieljamesryanphotography]

Thank you!

[@bronzehawk3646]

Bro I learned editor on premier pro and optical flow feature came in new update and I liked it alot then later I switched to davinci and I still kept premier pro for optical flow mainly and few other features that I didn't knew how to do in resolve but I thought optical flow was only available in premiere pro this is so much helpfully for me and I can finally stop using premiere pro and delete it thanks man 🤝

[@thidm]

What settings of the S&Q you leave your camera? 240fps Frame rate but the rec frame rate? 24 or 120 for a faster playback?

[@ricardraventos2308]

what film profile did u use? SLOG 3? DO u usually overexpose? Thanks a lot mate love the video!!!

[@bipulbasak8001]

Is this the free version or the studio version? Coz whenever I try to choose the speed warp option, a "DAVINCI RESOLVE STUDIO" text appears on the the timeline like a watermark.

[@fugander]

This a really good and helpful tutorial. I just can't figure out the "maths" about the final fps, can you provide your thoughts on that? I'd expect a video approx 4 times longer that the original if going from 240 fps to 1000 fps, or do I get this wrong. Can you also elaborate a bit about the value of using at higher shutter speed to reduce blur? Again, thanks for a great tutorial. I'll definitely subscribe on your channel.

[@slambk]

Hello, You are right as you aren't the only one, I think what we can do is to shoot at high frame rate and in extended or with a High shutter speed as mentioned by Dutchground Media to eliminate the Blurriness then after do the Speeding ramping tricks... I will not mind about how much x slow is , as longer I love what I see... lol

[@mfadhiladhhan1570]

Helpfull tutorial. After I tested it several times, I found one problem, there will be waves if the object is too small and out of focus. how to deal with it?

[@AlexDon]

Extremely high shutter speed

[@GloryStoryCz]

!!! amazing. good job.

[@MengL33]

Fantastic tutorial

[@mirovrlik]

Thank You man, I will try this for sure

[@kienobimedia]

This is awesome what lights did you use? Can you share the link for them? Looking for a strong light for that 1/4000

[@AlexDon]

Thanks a lot! I used the Nanlite Forza 500 + 120 mm softbox

[@talayash88]

this was very helpful 🙏🙏

[@UnchartedWorlds]

Great tutorial 👌

[@TJ-TJ]

What desk chair is that? it looks cool !

[@RT365]

Great video.

[@SATOSHIFilm]

This is great! Could I do the same thing on Premiere Pro??

[@kaizen5023]

Yep. "How to make slow-motion effects Open the Speed/Duration dialog box, set Speed to 50% and select Time Interpolation > Optical Flow. For better results, click Effect Controls > Time Remapping and Add Keyframes (optional to reduce and then increase speed within the same clip). Set speed for your slow motion."

[@SATOSHIFilm]

@@kaizen5023 So helpful! Thank you so much! Subscribed your channel!

[@carlomarcelino9184]

If you can convert 240fps into 1000fps in post, would it be the same process and result if instead of 240 I will just use 120fps and get half like 480fps? FX3,FX30 and A7Siii has 120fps in 4k resolution. I'd rather do it in 480fps which is still good and then have it in 4k resolution

[@husariaproductions4240]

About to join the ecosystem of Sony. Been us I think resolve for a while :) thank you so much for this. Have a few ideas with this and a sushi house

[@AlexDon]

Yes, Sony is such a good ecosystem to be part of. They always innovate🤘

[@lucasbrammall3833]

How do you deal with warped looking footage? Is that a post issue or camera? Image stabilization is off. Thanks

[@vishalzparadize]

Should I grade it first for it to work better or can this be effective on log footage..?

[@grxvideo]

it would be really nice if you explain what the optical flow actually does in order to do troubleshooting - when doesn‘t it work?

[@BeckOfficial]

It calculates the motion of the "objects" and then generate frames based on that. This can give artifacts (warping etc.) if the object is moving too quickly from frame to frame. So, the shorter distance the pixel has to travel, the better the result basically.

[@iljabuinitski9745]

5-10 minutes? I started the rendering, 13 days and still counting... What shuttle PC is used here?

[@OPblC_KZ]

What is the maximum frame resolution allowed at 1000fps?

[@andreas_triant]

Hey there, what lights do you need for a basic 120fps set up tho?

[@delproductofficial]

🔥🔥🔥

[@Motle009]

I just bought the Sony FX three and basically being at the same party as the A7S and Is pretty much the same camera. I am curious to see if this same effect can work with outdoor lighting during the day. For example if I were to shoot hummingbirds at the feeder. Have you tried it all with outdoor conditions? I’m just curious to know and wanted to hear your thoughts

[@actionfilmschile6324]

Hello! Did the trick work for you outside during the day?

[@JayNikam]

i dont think it will work on hummingbird.

[@Motle009]

@@JayNikam I don’t know if it would work either but it would interesting to try than not try at all.

[@50ey]

Amazing!!! Thank you so much!!

[@DominicProMax]

davinci gang 💪💪💪

[@tushar1139]

4:41 reminder for me 😗

[@WAirles]

hello, why i cant in my davinci put that marker like you on 05:05? ''Option key ''as you say. thx.

[@Al_Creations]

Great Video … thank you for the tutorial

[@Jan-gp9xb]

do i understand this right that this should work on any camera and any farmerate? my bmmcc only shoots 60 fps would i be able to dial that up to 240 fps with this method?

[@retromograph3893]

Yes, any camera, but consult your local farmer about his rates!

[@AlexDon]

Yes Jan, you str correct 🤘

[@joshdiditt]

great tutorial.

[@MushtaqHussainofficial]

Could you please share lights links ?

[@dmoratoprat]

your mama didn't tell you you don't play with foooooddd???? 😩 haha goodvideo!

[@tejinder868]

so if i shot video with 960 fps from my phone i can slow it down even more like 5 times slower with this software ?

[@CosminComi]

Bomba! Are si Final Cut Pro optical flow 😁Good tips pe shutterspeed si speed up inainte de slow 👍🏻👍🏻

[@AlexDon]

Da, insa la Resolve treaba misto e cu speed warp, acolo e trick-ul 🤘

[@franklinmichael671]

I was considering buying the chronos 2.1 or an a7siii, watching this I definitely prefer the a7siii hahah

[@AlexDon]

Yes, I was looking at that one too but it’s hard to use and you don’t film that much slowmo everyday in order to be a good investment

[@franklinmichael671]

@@AlexDon Yeah it's hard to justify the purchase, not to mention it has worse image quality and a smaller sensor so you get less light

[@KINGSLAYERLineage2]

Очень круто!)

[@mlupa666]

How to avoid such artifacts and warp look? what kind of movement did not work?

[@tayballtop]

What is suggested shutter speed if I would like to acheive this with sony a73 where only 120fps 1080p is an option?

[@JayNikam]

do 1/4000 or higher... this effect requires sharp frames since softwares tries to recreate missing frame. So clearer the frame is better will be results.

[@MrMrtraveller]

Setting in sony for 240 fps ?

[@magiclay]

but if you have 240 fps where you get the rest 760 fps data?

[@JayNikam]

your computer software guesses those missing frames from available frames. That is why you need high shutter speed so that all frames will be perfectly sharper without any motion blur and then computer will be able to regenerate frames in better way. This effect works better or simple objects . Also it works better if background is plain simple and not messy...

[@Michal13Jedrzejewski12]

Aweeeesome, can I do it in FCPX ?

[@gearienoxcuses3936]

can you do this with 4k 120fps? I would gather you wouldn't be able to hit 1000fps but could you at least hit 120fps. Also wouldn't this process be doable with nearly any camera where you can jack up the shutter speed and shoot 120 to 240fps? Thanks

[@AlexDon]

Yes you can 🤘

[@imaflymydroneatit]

I tried 4k120 and 1080x240 last night after finding this video. It worked just fine, but the 1080x240 looked better I have to assume cause you just have twice the natural frames to work with.

[@Hadzart2030]

What was the lenses that you used for that ?

[@saifalnaqbi2819]

how can I do this in premiere pro?

[@glennparker8247]

Easy. By switching to Davinci Resolve. PP is so shit

[@Iwtbaf]

Can you do this with the canon R5?

[@dash251]

What focus settings did you have the camera on?

[@AlexDon]

Manual focus 🤘🤘

[@DashVisionLLC]

@@AlexDon Thank you.

[@hollyfut]

why is it same price like chronos when you cant shoot real 1000 fps? it costs over 4000?

[@cervellimatteo]

Work with any camera? With gopro video at 240fps?

[@JayNikam]

dont think so.... go pro wont have blur bg so the new frames that are created by software will be more messy.

[@JayNikam]

also there is app called VSCO, it has same feature under smooth motion option.

[@AB-nb9nk]

Is this possible on the free version of davinci?

[@khaerulfikri1304]

R u using raw file?

[@andreigaming5581]

Hi, are you from Romania?

[@saifalnaqbi2819]

DOES ANYONE KNOW IF THIS WORKS IN PREMIERE PRO??? OR AFTER EFFECTS?

[@Oduncukiz]

I think you can do in "speed duration" option. but you must choose optical flow then rendering that part.

[@JayNikam]

optical flow in premiere and time warp in after effects.

[@Carmen-Ray]

Hi, you used codec XAVc-S HD exactly ? Also what kind of card do you used do record the 240 fps ? or what is the minimum to allow this ? Thanks a lot

[@AlexDon]

Yes yes, that’s exactly right

[@geraldofabianoartes3074]

Magnífica parabéns. Grande abraço Brasil

[@syedarmaghanhassan4652]

it is a Studio Feature, not on the free-version

[@sivalike6519]

Sony a7iii 1000fps is possible?

[@tsinchansue]

Can you do this with premier pro?

[@YasinHasan]

right click on the footage > Speed > there is optical flow option

[@JayNikam]

optical flow and now there is an update in premiere which gives us time warp effect in premiere which was only available to after effects until now.

[@cheekywekaproductions6816]

Anyone know if you can do this in Final Cut??

[@shreyasheen1116]

Skip to 2:12. Thank me later

[@jaymcgill7112]

Hi Alexandru, if I give you some 240fps footage from a Sony A7SIII can you edit it to 1,000 for me?

[@onlinerzizi240]

i can

[@troywalt4834]

you can just use an AI to do this like topaz lab vaei, this means you wont need those very expensive lights, just shoot in 240 fps and let AI do its trick

[@Funvidsiran]

this camera worth 4000 us dollars how to save money for this one

[@syedarmaghanhassan4652]

did anybody try that with a6300?

[@TheCrazyStudent]

The video title is a bit misleading. I first thought that the Sony A7SIII could do 1000 fps. Then I got to know that it's actually 250 fps combined with a trick. However, at that time I still thought the trick was done with the Sony A7SIII, not in post processing with a video editor. It wasn't clear in the beginning that this video is all about a video editing trick. Slightly disappointing as I was looking for information on slow mo cameras, not editing tricks. I don't know why the Sony A7SIII is even mentioned in the video title, since the video is about "true motion" processing in DaVinci Resolve. It doesn't matter which camera is used to take the shot in this case.

[@laylaln]

Did you ever find a camera that hits the spot? I am also looking for cameras with high FPS. The chronos 2.1 is my dream but 7k for body alone 😢

[@AndrewCbi]

ISO 12.800? Does that thing even have a sensitivity? Or u can crank it to infinity? 😂😳

[@AlexDon]

The a7siii has 2 base iso, one at 400 and one at 12.800 this is where the camera has the cleanest shadows 💪

[@iamdanfleser]

6:52 say thanks later