Thanks for the breakdown. Looks like my first camera will be the Sony!
@the_daniel_life4 жыл бұрын
hehe nice choice. I like my Sony a lot.
@Zhorellski6 жыл бұрын
Sony is just starting! Canon has been on the camera game since the time of Dinosaurs! Sony’s advancement super impressive!
@angekattts224 жыл бұрын
Maybe for the photography, sony has more history with video cameras
@TechWiz19836 жыл бұрын
This is the best review/comparison I’ve seen on KZbin. Excellent job! Exactly what I was looking for, thank-you. Can’t wait for my A73 to arrive :)
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hallo, thanks a lot mate. Many greetings from Frankfurt and a lot of fun with the Sony camera. Daniel
@Bencaprio Жыл бұрын
yesss
@PakapolJaijong6 жыл бұрын
U can change ur video focus speed on Sony : slow med fast
@chuck905046 жыл бұрын
many reviewers not familiar with the system miss out on this...... I typically leave it on fast because it's not jerky, however standard gives a more cinematic feel.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, we have tried out all speeds. Canon was slightly faster. Daniel
@mralexlex6 жыл бұрын
When you have EVF you don't need second screen on camera body, everything is in viewfinder, no need to put down camera and change settings. That's the one of many advantages of MILC cameras.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the extra info. Daniel
@AlexPasek6 жыл бұрын
The truth is *IT DOESN'T MATTER* 😄 All that matters is skill and if your tools will help you deliver the final product that client will like. As an example, I received source material shot on AG-DVX200 which I couldn't use b/c operator did a really bad job. At the end to save it I used a mix of footage from backups: Sony a6300 and iPhone X and it worked. You can compare RAW / S-Logs / bits and spec sheets all you want... the end result is more important than numbers.
@EHendricksFilms6 жыл бұрын
i just got my A7III... I LOVE IT!...i have used canon hg21, canon 7d, canon 6d, sony a7rii, A7sii, and A7riii....... annnnd the dji Osmo........and again..... I LOVE this camera. The photography i can do is Dope, the low light power is incredible, and the price was on POINT.
@Silvestian5 жыл бұрын
What do You recommand for 65% photography ans 35% videography? Sony A7R3 or Sony A73?😊
@katiecarpenter52524 жыл бұрын
What do you recommend as the best portrait lens for the Sony A7iii? I'm looking to invest in one soon. :D
@Silvestian4 жыл бұрын
I've got the A7iii and I'm very happy.
@rubenkristianto61066 жыл бұрын
Why you make it so personal? I thought it’s an objective comparison for both cam
@michalinajurek55865 жыл бұрын
Good job, thanks :) Hello from Poland !
@the_daniel_life5 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot. Regards, Daniel
@areksp6 жыл бұрын
for test Canon + 24-105 ??? NO WAY !
@riteshmallik49395 жыл бұрын
why is in A7iii images the sky look so bluish and in canon images it looked perfectly natural...I have seen videos of A7iii which looked dominated by majenta colors.. I wish canon had given us the latest codecs, and latest features..I still find canon colors so pleasing to the eyes..
@the_daniel_life5 жыл бұрын
I know what you mean and what you are talking about. The colors tend to look much better using the A7 III in Adobe Lightroom. A lot more natural and I think we were using a picture style. Daniel
@yobeckyg39104 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for such a comprehensive and fantastic breakdown. You've really helped me.
@thebentzenable5 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love the Canon ❤️💪
@the_daniel_life5 жыл бұрын
I like both, so I got both for myself
@stevenmeansphotography3861 Жыл бұрын
@@the_daniel_life if you could only have one only would it be the canon or sony
@adrian_barreto6 жыл бұрын
Great video Daniel.. Very informative
@hueybui6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comparison Daniel. Quick question, how did the Canon glass work on the a7iii using the mc-11? Thanks!
@jimmythegent91906 жыл бұрын
First time in 15yrs of shooting with Canon I've made the cross over to sony. Canon does not care about its customers anymore. And Sony is listening to them. Big difference.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Both of them have two camera divisions, photo and video, but Sony uses all their features for one camera which is stunning for the price of 2K, Daniel
@anthonymorales43686 жыл бұрын
Sony is baiting customers by throwing all specs on cheap cameras....we'll see how long your investment last. Then again, you are not worry about that because next year Sony will release the next generation making your current camera inferior. And you, as a faithful Sony fanboy will look for another $2000 to replace your current unit. LOL Sony reality.
@vomillicious6 жыл бұрын
Can you link RAW photos of the exact same thing from both cameras so I can test the dynamic in the exact same conditions. That would be much appreciated. Thanks!
@SkepTechTV6 жыл бұрын
Great review, Daniel, erste Sahne!! Subscribed & 👍🏼 Also thinking about getting the A7III, stepping up from the Panasonic G80/85.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, danke. Beste Grüße wo immer du auch bist. Daniel
@adrianmixit19984 жыл бұрын
Canon Eos mark iv is better all day.
@7legendary5 жыл бұрын
CHEAP ??? He said Cheap like it isn’t 2k plus lol 😂
@diversedad79545 жыл бұрын
That is cheap for a camera tbag competes with "pro" cameras. I think this camera is better than the Canon 1dx and as good or almost as good as the 1dxm2 in many ways. Considering the 1dx bodies are $6k, this is a pretty cheap camera.
@jdherbig6 жыл бұрын
Your image comparison is not good!!!!! video hands down you are right about the sony in video aspects. However your tests are with 2 different lens are in consistent. the vignetting from the 24-104 f4 is common and is a way cheaper lens at $900 vs the 24-70 f2.8 at $2000. Not familiar with the g-series lens to much but it is the top of the line lens sony produces and it is safe to say a comparison of a the two 24-70 f2.8 lenses would be correct.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, I did not compare the sharpness or the vignetting at all. It`s just about the general performance. I did not have the 24-70mm during our review of the cameras. Daniel
@NetoVelasco6 жыл бұрын
For those of you changing to sony, and want to sell your 5d mark iv, im looking to buy a used mark iv!
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Haha nice
@sbaluba5 жыл бұрын
Im interested... if you still here just contact me
@Rajupkd4 жыл бұрын
Hahaha 1000 likes To you !!!
@abiachr4 жыл бұрын
U r like a coward
@oudjunk6 жыл бұрын
Hello, long time that I don’t visit your channel and this video just show on my feed :)
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, thanks for visiting again. Daniel
@BilalAhmad-rj9ic4 жыл бұрын
In photography which camera is best sony a7iii or canon 5d mark IV or canon 5d mark iii.
@sendykumalakanta16 жыл бұрын
I;m sorry, but I can't agree with you on the color accuracy, I watched the reviews and bought the "better color" shtick, and I got the Sony A7III, a very fun to use camera, already familiar on handling as I also own an a6300 and a6500 and played with my friends A7R II, BUT, still prefer Canon color science, off the bat the Sony colors still looked too bluish/purple, did a test today by shooting a flower with both Sony A7III and my Canon 5DS (scaled it down to 22mpx so it wouldn't gain more detail from 50mpx), the colors were right on the spot every time with the 5DS, but the dynamic range was shit especially in the shadows. And before anyone says, fix te colors in post bla bla bla, I just love the fact that you get nice color out of the cam from Canon.
@kristabluesmith9405 жыл бұрын
therein lays the rub
@bojangbg5 жыл бұрын
You "prefer" canon colors, which means nothing, Sony has the most accurate colors on the market :) and this is proven
@Andre90k5 жыл бұрын
@@bojangbg "most accurate colors on the market" are You kiddding us? You need alot to learn about colors ;) and u need look on colors with professional calibrated monitor with wide gamut of colors ;). Actually Sony has no compare with Canon about colors science ;)
@bojangbg5 жыл бұрын
@@Andre90k Come on pleaaaaase, not again one of those guys who has all his knowledge out of youtube XD hahahaha... I have a print studio, a 3D Table Studio for products, 5 camera systems and a partnership with a Film studio... beside that i have at least 5 hardware calibrated professional monitors... and you know what... canon isnt relevant anymore. and you are mixing things up... you are mentioning "color science" which has nothing to do with COLOR ACCURACY ! ... the one you mentioned is a specific JPG look, the one which i mean is the color reproduction and the BIT depth of the color channels... which also means that you can reproduce canon colors on a sony camera, while you definitley CAN'T reproduce sony colors on a canon camera.... they have this shitty magenta alienskin look... which was initially made to make asians look more european... (skin tones) .. which i dont like bcs it is so far from reality away like a whore from a virgin
@adrianpocea22876 жыл бұрын
Bull. I just used them, side by side at an event. I actually love the Sony, it became my camera, it will help me make money. It is mine now. But , man, you can tell me whatever you want, I don't care, no bias. When I imported the pictures in Lightroom, first of all, I didn't notice any sensible differences in noise and low light. Light is light, noise is noise. You have good light, you gonna get great pictures, you don't , they are pretty much the same. No differences on people's faces whatsoever. But , man, when I look at the colors, night and day. Sony colors are flat, devoid of vibrance, and with low light they degrade substantially. Canon's colors pop, they are creamy, stylish, they save even a picture with noise. You can do whatever lab tests and chart tests, a pro that makes money photographing people will tell the difference.
@Julia-hk9jp5 жыл бұрын
wtf im confuse of what you saying
@Rajupkd4 жыл бұрын
Exactly!!!
@kerenabc1234 жыл бұрын
Julia I know right 😂 I can’t tell which one he likes more lol
@Blue007156 жыл бұрын
I think either one would work when just shooting around town, I would like to know how the Sony performs in a wedding or other high stress situation compared to the Mk IV
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Since the 5D is more intuitive to use, it will probably perform better than Sony. If you handle the Sony well, you will notice that the results are stunning. Daniel
@joeblower91006 жыл бұрын
We have Sony´s (A9+A7III) and Canon´s (2x 5D Mark IV) in use at weddings. Canon´s generally deliver better results. Why? Canon´s are more reliable than Sony´s. The Sony A7III and A9 have had memory card problems in summer outdoor temperatures. For video the Canon is also better. The autofocus (touch) and tracking is so reliable that shooting video with aperture 1.2 is very easy. The Canon display is much clearer and the colors more beautiful, especially if you want to show the bride and groom photos. We show photos and video clips directly from the camera and this ensures great feedback from our customers. With the Sony display colors, the resonance is mostly absent. It may be small things, but for us it is big differences that have a positive effect. A tip for you, test Canon C-Log, you will be thrilled.
@xiwang28416 жыл бұрын
hi , i wonder how do you deal with CANON 5DIV without high frames like 100fps or 120fps in 1080p mode
@NARRASSAFilmes6 жыл бұрын
Joe Blower that’s have a reason why almost everybody who has both of this câmeras are saying they prefer Canon. To be honest, the new Sony specs we usually use it 5% of the time, or less.
@ade42005 жыл бұрын
you just shoot the shutter speed you want for the framerate and dont/cant change the framerate,...you want 120fps, shoot in 60fps with 1/240s shutter, then drop it in a 30fps timeline and slow it down, final cut optical flow in all my test produces perfect results, i think you can actually get better quality this way, as cameras drop the bitrate when recording 120fps. When optical flow or twixtor fails it seems to be only motion blur that produces artifacts, at 1/240s shutter most shots will not have motion blur. This method seems flawless in my test, and higher overall bitrate/higher quality. I would be interested if anyone says different and why. @@xiwang2841
@i.m2m3 жыл бұрын
@@ade4200 I’m gonna buy new cam so you recommend the Canon?
@user-yx6ok3tj8y5 жыл бұрын
my 7d broke... I have long wanted to go to the full frame and was ready to buy 5dm4, but then there was this ill-fated sony A73, and now I'm finally confused with the choice...Like there is glass on the canon, but the camera is ancient, and even works in 4K crop of the advantages of the viewfinder and a strong body. Sony also has a rotary screen, light weight, and similar characteristics. I wish they hadn't done it...)
@shawnandros23555 жыл бұрын
"If you have to choose today for your first camera...." Aren't we talking pro-level here?? Why end the video with "first camera"? We want the best professional grade performance.
@markg84426 жыл бұрын
Man i needed this input!!
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, nice to hear that and many greetings from London, Daniel
@782857256 жыл бұрын
If you like canon, don’t compare with Sony, because the canon is already good enough for you. But other people do need a better camera, not base on your love to canon.
@anthonymorales43686 жыл бұрын
I guess a lot of people in the professional world love Canon...it shows every time I attend major events. I have a 5D4, what makes you think I cannot afford an A7iii to play with. I just don't play with cameras, I work with them, and the 5D4 is a workhorse.
@jhonrinkarsi22696 жыл бұрын
Anthony Morales maybe, just maybe because u're just too familiar with canon ecosystem and cant get rid of it. OR maybe u just have too much canon lens, its not only a body when u consider to switch.
@anthonymorales43686 жыл бұрын
I agree, I do have many great lens, it all started with the original 6D which I still love. Not the most advanced camera but instead, it produced great images. Ever since then I personally matured with the system. Why because the system cannot adjust to me but vice verse. I am sure I can grab a Sony and produce great images once I complete the learning curve. My point is, that in todays world, most cameras are more than capable of producing great images and videos. I do not focus so much on tech as much as the final product. If I did, I would be buying a different camera every year. That is not sustainable and it is not cheap. I have no problems with people loving my images and coming back for more so I don't see the need to jump ship. BTW, I do not bash Sony, I do bash those that have a superiority complex over Canon when they produce nothing to actually back it up. Cheers, and by all means enjoy photography/video no matter what gear you choose.
@782857256 жыл бұрын
Yes, every camera is good this years, no bad ones. but as a pro, I need a camera that is fast, better iso, not heavy(I only use prime lens and old zeiss), film good 4K, it's a tool. the better tool you have, the easier for you to get the job done. there are just too many thing DLSR is missing. I shot with nikon canon before, nothing wrong if you always shooting in a normal setup, the image you can is the same. and switch system is not so bad, just do it slowly. you can use your canon lens on sony. pro dont really care about it, if you can make 1000+ a day.
@goncalorodrigues94866 жыл бұрын
If i wanna start making money out of film making, how should i start?
@leonelcarloscontrerasgarci24794 жыл бұрын
Hi! If I only dedicate myself to architectural photography ... What camera do you recommend? (Canon Mark IV vs Sony a7 iii)
@the_daniel_life4 жыл бұрын
Hello, I use the my Sone a7 III with this lens here -> kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpmkiqJomNykZ7c
@1008asad6 жыл бұрын
Sony is way ahead in technology in comparison to canon or nikon. We need to accept the harsh truth.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
I know. Great camera. Many thanks. Daniel
@anthonymorales43686 жыл бұрын
Post a link to your amazing work you have created with your Sony high tech mirrorless camera. Post link.
@anthonymorales43686 жыл бұрын
You see, when you tell these Sony fanboys to post their amazing images and videos link they drop the subject. That is because they are keyboard warrior and not true photographers.
@diggyz826 жыл бұрын
Yeah finally they are after some failures with batteries and overheat. Sony has a long way to go until the professionals will change though. Canon has much more lenses, especially if your into sport and that kind of stuff. Also the support Canon got is very important as a professional photographer. Its a bit harder to go mirrorless for Canon that have so many lenses. Sony didnt have very much before. Will probably be some kind of adapter for old EF lenses.
@toby84626 жыл бұрын
Last time I checked, mark iv had better focus, didnt overheat and didnt have battery issues. Sony sucks
@lemphaboham5 жыл бұрын
canon 5d mark iv😍❤️
@the_daniel_life5 жыл бұрын
My one and only. Daniel
@mahakusolt6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this very interesting comparison video. I really like it. My only comment is that it would be better to use canon 24-70 2.8 ii to compare with sony 24 70 GM.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello my friend, that you very much for objection. I did not compare the sharpness because I was using the 24-105mm. I had no 24-70mm F2.8L II at hand for this review. Daniel
@threejan83206 жыл бұрын
But i'm here for Sony
@nyambe6 жыл бұрын
For me quality or features have nothing to do with it. Modern cameras are beyond excellent. The biggest thing for me is excitement. And that is where the Sony wins. There is nothing more exiting than innovation. Excellent detailed video
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot. Daniel
@AllCarsUnited6 жыл бұрын
Got a a7r3 and sold my 5d mark 4. Very impressed with what sony is doing
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, indeed. Many greetings from Frankfurt, Daniel
@devilmaycry3836 жыл бұрын
I have A7iii and finally a decent enough camera all I need now is to invest in better lenses.
@kiranchhetry076 жыл бұрын
StormRider2 best lenses?
@Konrad1626 жыл бұрын
Great video! I don't have any FF I want to start to go FF path, do you have any ideas where to start? Sony, Canon, Nikon or Pentax? mainly FF will be for event photography. For travel I have Fuji X-t20
@akshaychauhan-yp7tn4 жыл бұрын
i want to know my friend have a youtube channel so i want to upgrade video quality so which brand i prefer for videography. sony or panasonic or canon which is better for me. we aee shot in low light and outdoor also.
@JSManc16 жыл бұрын
Hey man, great video. How come you have such heavy vignette on your canon images before post processing?
@pcspraga6 жыл бұрын
hi what is the best adopter Canon lens for Sony body Is this work all the functions as Canon camera
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, I‘m using a METABONES adapter. I think it‘s the best option. Daniel
@rajendrashinde72805 жыл бұрын
Canon eos r... nikon z7....Sony a7 mk3 which is best for wedding .... Sony a7 record break? Please answer
@FotosyMas.6 жыл бұрын
I realized this was a troll video the moment he said Sony colors were better.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Don`t you think the same? Greetings, Daniel
@JSManc16 жыл бұрын
DarkRami haha. Right!! Canon Colour science is the best by a mile.
@anthonymorales43686 жыл бұрын
I agree, I have downloaded many Sony RAW images and they are not the best as people claim. I love my Canon 5D4. You can keep your IVIS, eye focus, zebras etc. Simplicity beats it anyways.
@sidarya316 жыл бұрын
Sony is faaaar better than 5d
@anthonymorales43686 жыл бұрын
Just because you say so? To me what is important is the final product and after downloading Sony RAW images files from Sony, it totally convinced me that I would not for the moment bother with anything currently has on their camera line up. Most young photographers are hooked on specs and gimmicks that are nice to have but not necessary to produce great work. Canon gets the job done right, without flinching...you cannot trust Sony to do that in a professional set up. Too many little issues with those cameras. You may want to turn a blind eye to eat to feel better about your purchase but in reality is that unless I was only a photography hobbyist I would not take Sony feeling 100% confident. And you know that.
@TheEmperor20293 жыл бұрын
09:13 5D mark IV is not 1.4 crop factor, it is 1.74 crop.
@the_daniel_life3 жыл бұрын
Thanks 🙏
@arjunlama73886 жыл бұрын
Hello sir ,can you suggest me which lense should i buy for great videos to sony a7iii?
@zirthana5 жыл бұрын
Sony a7 iii is a very good camer for videographer but canon 5d mark iv is still best for photographer ..
@pakiboyhadrou5 жыл бұрын
Thu Ro how
@GWAFEM5 жыл бұрын
@@pakiboyhadrou Yesterday it was -25C/-13F outside in Montreal. My 5D MK4 was full of snow and my battery still at 90+% after 2 hours of shooting. The Sony A7iii is not weather sealed. That's a game changer for me.
@DVZM.4 жыл бұрын
@@GWAFEM Wrong! A7iii is weather sealed of course! I have used mine several times in snow and rain.
@AishwaryamBuilder4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@the_daniel_life4 жыл бұрын
You are welcome. Daniel
@garima24732 жыл бұрын
Beautifully curated
@the_daniel_life2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Daniel
@justanotherguycommenting57545 жыл бұрын
Mirrorless cameras dont go with professional lenses dslrs use. Unless you wanna train your wrist muscles lol
@edwinmumbe954 жыл бұрын
How good is the compatibility of Sony to canon lenses ?
@the_daniel_life4 жыл бұрын
Depends. In my point of view there is a lot of improvement needed, also with a METABONES, which I‘m using. I try to use native lenses, except when I film. Daniel
@paulstevens28393 жыл бұрын
My new sony a73 will arrive tomorrow!
@the_daniel_life3 жыл бұрын
Sweet. Good camera :)
@RedHotChiliFleyfleh6 жыл бұрын
The contrast and saturation results in the 5D M4 depend on the picture profile settings. Interesting comparaison though 👍🏻
@RedHotChiliFleyfleh6 жыл бұрын
Crop is 1.74 in 4K on the 5D MIV btw...
@MyMomSaysImSmart6 жыл бұрын
Also, cameras with lower dynamic range appear to have more contrasty raw files...but that’s not actually a good thing. Raw files shouldn’t be contrasty.
@ccphotofilm6 жыл бұрын
There are no pictures profiles (seriously) in CANON 5D MKIV, picture profiles it´s SONY thing
@stevenmeansphotography3861 Жыл бұрын
Only In jpeg right
@MrDjangoChannel6 жыл бұрын
I am on D mark 3 and I hesitate between staying at canon or go to sony. I was wondering if using the sony A7Riii with canon lenses was really profitable or if it was better spent at sony completely. For good I have a 70-200 f / 2.8, a 50mm f / 1,2 and my 24-70 f / 2.8 so I would not like to part with it too quickly. So here is the sony a7r3 is it as well with canon lenses like I that those of the brand sony? sorry for my english who is not perfect
@shrikanthrv15463 жыл бұрын
can this camera match nikon 850 or 500 for bird photography or wildlife along with 200 - 500 mm lens
@Wozzmatic6 жыл бұрын
You had a filter on the canon while photographing the church? Looks like there is fringing. Might explain why you seem to think the mirror less has better dynamic range (which you seem to confuse with resolution). Also - why would someone is Europe want to shoot NTSC?
@DavidCharles-wi4qr6 ай бұрын
Would like Sony to use a Canon style articulating information screen. My biggest stop to buying a Sony. Then there's Canon's lack of ISBIS. It seems to be their biggest design error and they are still sticking with that fail. As if a product engineer said in a meeting " 95% of potential users want IBIS" and the design team leader said "We don't need no stinking IBIS!"
@the_daniel_life6 ай бұрын
It sounds like you have some strong opinions about camera features! Sony and Canon both have their unique design choices and priorities when it comes to camera features. Sony is known for its innovative technology and often prioritizes features like in-body image stabilization (IBIS), while Canon has its own strengths and focuses on other aspects of camera performance. It's understandable that the absence of certain features like IBIS or a Canon-style articulating screen might be a dealbreaker for some photographers. However, each brand caters to different preferences and needs within the photography community. If there are specific features you'd like to see in Sony or Canon cameras, it could be worth expressing your feedback directly to the companies through customer support channels or online forums. Your input as a consumer can help shape the direction of future camera development.
@DevangMendapara4 жыл бұрын
Which adptor you are using on Sony A7iii to use canon lense
@the_daniel_life4 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/aH-TlHaCfaqWeaM this one here
@Heart0rHead2 ай бұрын
How Canon lenses perform via the adapter on the Sony? (for stills)
@the_daniel_life2 ай бұрын
Easy and precise
@bandishkumarnimala22615 жыл бұрын
I like sony
@the_daniel_life5 жыл бұрын
I like Sony as well, that’s why I bought it
@itsmantu40975 жыл бұрын
7:06
@Bakatvgh4 жыл бұрын
Damnnn I like both
@the_daniel_life4 жыл бұрын
Me too. Daniel
@amanhvelpula34015 жыл бұрын
which one best
@JoshArmani6 жыл бұрын
Sony a7iii with this price tag with these future's is unbelievable and Yeah Sony mirrorless is far better than old machines, No comparisons...
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching. Many greetings, Daniel
@danielaudacious5 жыл бұрын
You asked the question, who is using 720p now a these days? I'm finding out alot of people are like "PEWDIEPIE". LOL.
@the_daniel_life5 жыл бұрын
No reference. Daniel
@audiogear44124 жыл бұрын
What microphone do you use? It sounds incredible.
@the_daniel_life4 жыл бұрын
Hello, all listed in the video description below. Daniel
@amanhvelpula34015 жыл бұрын
which one is best
@rafsunmaruf42613 жыл бұрын
Who is better?
@Shibiscorpio6 ай бұрын
Thank U♥️
@the_daniel_life6 ай бұрын
Welcome
@Pik8712296 жыл бұрын
Hi I just wonder does A7iii work well with Canon lenses when using "Wide" focus mode As I am considering to switch from A7ii
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Using the METABONES worked fine till now, using my 24mm 1.4L II
@phillippennington6 жыл бұрын
How was your auto focus on the Sony using Canon lenses/adapter?
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
For photos great, for videos poor.
@qtben176 жыл бұрын
I have both systems. Initially i thought sony is better but after working with it on few projects, it has lots of drawbacks. 4k overheating- it is unpredictable and makes this mode unreliable. Even in HD if used in direct sunlight it will overheat ( of course there are outdoor shoots). Its codec is no good esp HD. An interframe compression at 50 mbps is only for phone devices. Play it on tv and ul see lots of artifacts macroblocks. Log color profiles in 8 bit 50 mbps doesnt hold up. Its 120fps is jittery. Ul understand all this when you have the camera that long and get to compare the footage with canon’s.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, thanks a lot for the additional input. I did not review them in this kind of depth but thanks for letting me know. Daniel
@kevindiaz34596 жыл бұрын
Wow someone that isn't just generically saying, "OMG it is so much better!" or "OMG it overheats!" I think as the A7III matures into a full blown product what we will see is that pros will find it to be mostly a toy that can't do what they need, but amatures will love it since it gives them a full frame camera for so little (nothing is wrong with either of these things). Once the Sigma lenses drop they will even have some decent lenses for price too, and likely will never notice how often those lenses will misfocus the way a pro will. That gives Sony more time to get more lenses out, which is definitely their bottleneck, since they are kind of still new to that. In the meantime Canon is making a FF mirrorless, and everyone that is adapting Canon glass to the A7III will have the option of switching back easily once that drops, should they figure that is the better move. Not sure what Nikon will do if their D850 sales stagnate as the result of the A7III. I wonder how many back orders were cancelled on the announcement of the A7III? No matter. I'll keep shooting what I have until it can't do what I need. Then I will make the most sensible upgrade I can to keep doing that. The specs matter less and less each generation, at least for stills, video is still making large improvements. Just about all modern cameras can get the job done for most people. There are so few people that absolutely require a specific camera for a specific job, and they aren't on youtube talking about it in the comments (they likely are in some remote area working for people like natgeo or nasa). Focus on the art, and everything else will fall in line.
@2964Ann6 жыл бұрын
Thank
@gku20046 жыл бұрын
Hi i am currently looking for a camera for stills n movie videos ( horror so i need good iso performance) canyou recommend a camera for these functions? Thanks
@reng66886 жыл бұрын
kevin Diaz - "Focus on the art..." That's funny. I read your comments all over Canonpricewatch.com trying to convince everyone to buy Canon equipment. That sound like a fanboy more than an artist. Sorry, I can't help it when I see an hypocrite!
@Alexander-tj2dn6 жыл бұрын
You should compare the inner mic of the two cameras, not only Sony.
@nabilalmarfadi7748 Жыл бұрын
You cant just use good lense on sony comparing it to canon with kit lense
@the_daniel_life Жыл бұрын
By that time I did not have any Sony lenses
@reng66886 жыл бұрын
I refused to buy into Sony before the release of their gen III a7xxx. That was because of poor battery performance, reliability issues, and service support. Well, I bought both a7III and a7rIII and sold both my Canon and Nikon gear (6D, D750, D810 + lenses). Sony won't make you a better photographer, but it will make your job little bit easier (ibis, you get what you see, and eye af for me). Is Sony perfect? No way, it needs to work on weather sealing their equipment, big time!
@nm8006 жыл бұрын
Which is the best sony for video? alpha 7 sII or alpha 7 r III? Cheers
@nm8006 жыл бұрын
or just 7III, don't know every model name😅
@TheMrprosyndicate6 жыл бұрын
I don’t think the A7III kills the 5D4, by definitely destroys the 6D2. The A7R3 is the 5DIV’s direct competitor
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
The A7R has it`s competitor more in the 5Ds or 5DR I would say. Daniel
@TheMrprosyndicate6 жыл бұрын
Well that's the thing. When I went to buy a new camera, I was torn between the resolution of the 5Ds/DS R or the 5D IV for it's all-round performance/ However, when comparing against the A7R III, which exceeded the 5D IV in dynamic range, AF coverage and tracking as well as hosting what I find to be fantastic low light and having such high resolution, I saw no reason for the 5Ds and the 5D IV, sony took a fantastically well rounded camera and threw in the megapixel boost. I feel like Canon needs to stop worrying about cannibalizing previous stand-alone models and put everything into one body.
@richardamechi61125 жыл бұрын
If Canon gave us a better video codec for 4k it would be much better. Having to use tonnes of memory card space to do a one hour 4k video is unacceptable. I think they did this to keep selling the other canon products. The crop on the 4k video is also disappointing.
@MyMomSaysImSmart6 жыл бұрын
You can increase the video autofocus speed on the Sony. By default it’s set to medium, but you can switch it to fast if you so choose. Medium produces a more natural result, though.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, we tried all modes already but Canon was faster in terms of focusing during live view than the Sony. Daniel
@SyafiqAnuar4 жыл бұрын
Sony color is better?? Huhuhu..need more research to clarify that..im not any fans..but for me canon is the best color science..then the sony the best autofocus camera..
@the_daniel_life4 жыл бұрын
Hello, well in post processing I really appreciate the Sony colors a bit more than the ones from Canon. Daniel
@SyafiqAnuar4 жыл бұрын
@@the_daniel_life hahaaha..it depend on editor bro..now we talking about raw footage..not in post or final result after touch up
@rphotographyofficial3 жыл бұрын
thought the a7iii supports uhs2 300mbps
@sergioderderian166 жыл бұрын
Hi, Thanks a lot for this great review! Do you loose functionnalities with the canon Lens adaptor on the Sony caméra? Sergio
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Yes, the AF does not really have a good performance using the adapter during video recording. Some AF functions may not be available, like the loupe during manual focusing. Daniel
@holgersp6 жыл бұрын
I think that when talking about switching from Canon to the A7III, for those who move wanting to use their old gear, the advertised price difference is a bit of a fallacy. Let's start with the camera body price tag which in Europe is approx 2250 vs 3600. Now, if you want to use canon lenses and have any hope of using AF-C in video, the cheaper MC-11(+-300EUR) won't make it, unless you have ART Sigma lenses. The Metabones V will do more or less but goes for nearly 500 EUR. Then... the battery thing. One extra Sony battery costs 90 EUR, while a normal LP-E6 for the IV cost around 45. Oh, and the battery charger is not included in the A7, another 90 EUR to the list. If you own speedlites and want to use some of the advance features... forget it. Of course, even after adding all this the A7III would still be cheaper, but for those deciding if buying a Mark IV or switching to Sony while keeping their Canon Glass, the difference in price is not the 1350 EUR as it might look at first sight. The real comparison would be more in the line of 3000 vs 3600. I know this from a close friend who has switched and it is spending way more than first expected, when adding all the accesories.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, thanks for the add. info you made. I use now the METABONES V adapter, which works super nice, not neccesarely in video mode but for most photo stuff. Who need the add. charger, if you can charge the battery through the housing? The battery of the Sony lasts super long and the LP-E6 does not cost 45€, it more like 70€. Daniel
@holgersp6 жыл бұрын
Yes, the Metabones and the MC-11 are great for photo but for video... We have just spent a whole evening trying the metabones V with 5 different Canon lenses and we are not too happy about it. Regarding the battery charger. You are aware that the built in charger takes more than 4 hours to fully charge the battery, right?. If you are going for intensive / travelling and have two-three batteries is not even an option to use the built-in charger. I can agree if you do a "light" use.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
I noticed that it takes a lot of time, but since the performance of the battery is so good I was happy to use the in-build charger with a spare battery. Daniel
@231swarup4 жыл бұрын
Is it really sony dont have crop in video???? I am also using sony A7iii but how to get that canon colour in sony ??
@mattiagargioni58673 жыл бұрын
just get lightroom preset aha
@Nitrogenetiks6 жыл бұрын
You should not use and adaptor for a proper comparison. Sony with native lens because lens with adaptor are lenses not ready for mirrorless
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
True. Now I have my Metabones Speed Booster. next time buddy. Daniel
@ksweigert126 жыл бұрын
Does the Canon lens adapter on the a7iii limit continuous shooting to 3 frames per second?
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hallo, ich habe keine Einbußen feststellen können. Grüße, Daniel
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
No I did not see any recution in speed. Daniel
@bhavyanshusingh6 жыл бұрын
I am planning to buy Sony a7 iii. I already own a 5d mk iv. I am getting Sony for the photography. I am looking forward taking portraits with Sony a7 iii. Would you suggest me buying sony lens for it or Canon?
@suatsekil5 жыл бұрын
have u bought sony? what is ur experience? canon 5dm4 or sonya7III
@bhavyanshusingh4 жыл бұрын
@Merrium Axan Get G master lens
@bhavyanshusingh4 жыл бұрын
@Merrium Axan I have both 5d mkiv and sony a7iii. Depends on what are you shooting more
@godz29286 жыл бұрын
so this is the new android vs apple now huh?
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Kind of, Daniel
@godz29286 жыл бұрын
the daniel life hey daniel..i have a 6d mark ii w/ sigma 35mm 1.4 i wonder if it would be fine for me to go back to regular 6d...hdr is better and it's cheaper...
@carloscarlitos40106 жыл бұрын
This was amazing! Thank you!
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
You are welcome. Many greetings, Daniel
@rdphotography90586 жыл бұрын
hiii.. I have Canon mark iii ( many lens ),, but now i want swicth to sony....?
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hmm. Get a METABONES speed booster to use all your Canon lenses. I would get it as a second body, not as my main one. Greetings from Frankfurt, Daniel
@xdalic3 жыл бұрын
Sonys are good but the build quality are bad.... I regretted my purchase , went back to canon because of reliability.
@sohaibmahagri50375 жыл бұрын
Your using 2 different lenses!
@the_daniel_life5 жыл бұрын
True.
@kamalyadav30246 жыл бұрын
nice video sir ..thanks....
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Hello, thank you very much for your support and many greetings from Frankfurt Daniel
@kamalyadav30246 жыл бұрын
the daniel life sir welcome .. I am indian ... I kown english .. but ... I like .. your video sir .. I am not knowledge english...
@pdhlmatos5 жыл бұрын
Its a Sony, Sony is better
@hno.javieralcides81733 жыл бұрын
C A N O N E S U N A M A R C A FINA
@pdhlmatos3 жыл бұрын
@@hno.javieralcides8173 😂 Sony is 10 years ahead 👍👌💪
@RajRaj-hf1cj6 жыл бұрын
iam wedding photographer which camera can i buy canon 5d mark 4, sony a73 are sony a7r3. pls suggess any one camera.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
If you are a professional wedding photographer I would suggest to take the Sony a7RIII camera
@RajRaj-hf1cj6 жыл бұрын
thank you
@Rajupkd4 жыл бұрын
Canon 5D mark 4 undoubtedly
@pablozuniga2066 жыл бұрын
Which canon to sony mount adapter would u recommend?
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Metabones Speed Booster
@youareawesome86 жыл бұрын
If you have sigma then mc11
@advres6 жыл бұрын
Speedboosters are for crop cameras or shooting in a crop mode. The metabones adapters (not speedboosters) are recommended for full frame cameras like the A7iii
@JackiePlays6 жыл бұрын
The general consensus is the sigma mc-11. I'd recommend you to watch some videos on it as it's the clear winner and it's cheaper. Also, if you use any sigma ef mount lenses, then the mc-11 makes them work how they'd normally work when used natively
@merlinalfonso63746 жыл бұрын
In the video at 6:55 he is using the Sigma MC-11.
6 жыл бұрын
There are no comparable RAW files to compare (on your Google Drive). Most of them are JPG. Some folders are just empty.
@the_daniel_life6 жыл бұрын
Try to use a different account. I see them all loaded
6 жыл бұрын
I use 3 different accounts and it's not the case. I see many files, but there are no comparable RAW files (the same scenario to compare). Most of them are JPG.