SOUND **GREAT FTG GERMAN TROOPS BATTLE AMERICANS IN FRANCE, REEL 2, ACTION IN FRANCE. - LMWWIIHD342

[@retyanvanlerborgue8397]

1:15 you can see the german soldier on the left with an scoped-Enfield :-D

[@justman77.21]

These well-trained and brave German soldiers have no chance against Hollywood warriors, where they, like stupid ones, run back and forth to catch every bullet with their bodies.

[@rikpeol3612]

@regis bognor The Soviets suffered most of the casualties. You can't call that a winner. The English had to bring their "big brother" from overseas to help. All of them together ended the war because of their great majority.

[@guiseppe46]

@@rikpeol3612 Maybe the Germans should not have taken on the whole world! Losers twice in the first 50 years of the 20th Century!

[@geoffbell166]

@@rikpeol3612 Had to use the Commonwealth as well,we all payed a big price and then in later years the poms shat on us,wont happen again...

[@hughmcinally907]

No question that the German tanks and heavy weapons were far superior to their opponents. What beat them in the end was the volume of resources available to the Allies, and the lack of air support.

[@satchemo24]

What really beat them (in my opinion) was Adolf himself.

[@dot6441]

@@satchemo24 not really. Allied propaganda shows him to be a madman but i think he listened more to his generals than stalin or Churchill. Its just most surviving generals and allied media wanted him to portray him as the cause of all destruction

[@satchemo24]

@@dot6441 well like I said it's my opinion. There are many out there as you have yours. I appreciate the input.

[@maxjasmine]

And because they killed Rommel.

[@motorheadbanger7720]

What beat them in the end was something called: arrogance!

[@shadow-Sun]

The German army in ww2 was well trained , well equipped , well motivated , battle hardened and had better kit in a lot of cases than most of it's opponents they may well have won the war had they not taken on the sleeping giant of Russia as well as Fighting France , Poland , Netherlands etc and of course Great Britain . Had America not also entered the war (late but non the less welcome ) . Germany may have ended up winning the European war and dominating Europe thereafter . I am British and patriotic to my country but you can't help wonder what might have been under different circumstances , and yes I have respect for the average german soldier who fought as bravely for their country as any allied soldier fought for his not with standing the .(atrocities and the Holocaust being the responsibility mainly of the extremists side of the German war machine and Nazi party in particular )

[@randbarrett8706]

Germany lacked the strategic resources to fight a long war so they had to achieve all their objectives as quickly as possible to avoid being bogged down into a war of attrition. You say that the US entered the war late but the US spent years after declarations of war preparing for the invasions. The US simply lacked the capacity to seriously challenge the Axis forces for years after Pearl Harbor. Time was also on the Allies side as they had access to the resources of an entire continent whereas Germany never even managed to take control of the strategic resources which were the object of its invasion of the Soviet Union. Thus the Allies pursued a long war strategy in order to bring all of North America’s industrial capacity to bear on the Axis. Germany assumed that the Soviet Union would basically collapse after they kicked in the front door and that Britain would accept a political settlement after their boys were driven into the sea. Neither of those things happened but, remarkably, Germany maintained cohesion basically until its society was literally destroyed.

[@dondressel4802]

Definitely

[@rideandsmile822]

Had had had. ..if my aunt had balls, she would be my uncle, greetings from Germany.

[@gerrysmith7031]

Germany had the best trained troops at the start of the war catching every one cold but Britain had some very fine fighting troops come 1944 and had what Germans had at the start air superiority

[@johnmcdonald9304]

Shadow sun. America entered the war late? You fucking idiot, America was attacked on Dec. 7. 1941 and Germany declared war on the US three days later. The first American combat operations began in August and November of 1942.

[@Orientalfellowm]

I admire the Germans for their courage and superiority in terms of technology and tactics.

[@lostinpa-dadenduro7555]

They lose most efficiently. The myth of German military superiority is just that, a myth.

[@SpaddelLord]

Don't forget that quite a few were drugged with Pervitin etc., what made Blitzkrieg the real thing and felt back on them at a later time in the war.

[@aquat715]

@@SpaddelLord Both sides had their fair share of drugging.

[@akashsavangade518]

And also for their bravery , patriotism.

[@75diebold]

@@lostinpa-dadenduro7555 odin was on there side

[@endutubecensorship]

1:15 Wermacht using an Enfield No4Mk1-T sniper rifle

[@rlane63]

You could usually rely on German artillery to be used precisely and accurately, often in difficult circumstances, when their soldiers were outnumbered and without proper air cover.

[@Shannmeister]

1:16 The German soldier at the left of the screen has a Lee Enfield mk 4 with a scope on it.

[@lt.patterson6081]

Shannmeister problably captured

[@SirVergewaltig0re]

It´s called Beutewaffe.

[@MrSniperdude01]

So ?? Captured weapons....not that uncommon. Germans took a lot of UK small arms after the Dunkirk retreat & later during the Market Garden campaign. They also seized number of US small arms from the Browning FN factory in Belgium to Bazookas, even M1Garands & BARs which they researched to to see how they could make better. Germany made a better SAW -- StG43/44. I don't believe they made any Garand developments. Also I believe they made a 45.acp SMG later in the war, having already started using captured Tokarov 7.62rds

[@g13flat]

@@MrSniperdude01 A STG43/44 is not a SAW, it's an assault rifle.

[@MrSniperdude01]

@@g13flat #1. SAW = Squad Automatic Weapon. Auto rifle / Auto Weapon... fucking potatoe pototo. #2. it was deployed in a support /suppressive fire roll. Look it up. The Germans needed something as good as a MG42, but lighter, with easier ammo carry, good target pen, and quick mass production. Red tape is what kept it from being mass produced.

[@stephaniebrugel]

Wir kommen wieder!

[@harko1962]

0:40 der essenbringer....sehr wichtige männer!!

[@magr7424]

Absolut

[@enzoprosciutto210]

At 2:50 this guy has seen some shit I bet.

[@BlackIce777-b6h]

He fought in WW2 greatest war in history of mankind. What did you expect

[@BewareOfTheKraut]

Probably been at Crete.

[@nico-zt9od]

Yeah, those scars, his eyes, he's been in some bad places

[@jenggo4ever]

wow true/real story ..we are not seeing this in Hollywood movie ...tq very much

[@TopSecretVid]

Some great footage

[@matthiaselsser2865]

England without the USA would have no Chance...

[@hellofolks1762]

yep but always LATE

[@happaala]

@viking saxon Why did the British only brought 10 Divisions to the battle? The Franch bravely fought large German troops covering the British running away. The British ran away pretty much everywhere like in France, Norway and Singapore. They even make hero movies about running away and pretend the BoB was a great achievement when Adi never wanted to have anything to do with you anyway.

[@barryolaith]

We now know the Wartime English commentary towards the end ( 5:45 onwards) describing the Sherman tank as a 'formidable weapon' and describing the German claim that it's armour at its thickest point is thinner than panzer armour at its weakest point as "propaganda" is itself propaganda. There is more truth in the cited German statement. There is also no mention of the weak gun in the Sherman (excluding the Firefly). The first casualty in War is truth. Be assured every government will lie to the people in time of war. 'Weapons of mass destruction' anyone?

[@KB4QAA]

B: Get off your high horse. The Sherman WAS a formidable tank and performed its' job well. It was designed for different purposes than the panzers and to different requirements and limitations. Armor thickness alone is not proof of anything. In the end the Shermans supported the infantry as their primary mission and still defeated the German tanks in the end.

[@barryolaith]

Hello Pelican, no high horse here, I fear you miss the point. Are you not comfortable with the concept of British propaganda? Regarding your opinion on how good the Sherman tank was, I hold a different opinion. Like any subject, it can be debated. There's no need to get angry.

[@desertbootguy]

One thing is often missed concerning the Sherman. It's the fact that it was SHIPPED to Europe and you need ships, a lot of them, to carry the task. Patton in particular, didn't want bigger and heavier tanks in smaller number. A bigger tank takes more room on the boats, it means fewer tanks delivered to the front. Also, Patton didn't want to lose time training tankers on a new machine. He wanted to rush on Germany. May be for good reasons. But he got the point. As a matter of act, he didn't even want to switch to the higher velocity 76mm gun for the same training reason. It was to costly in time. He was very influential. That's why the US army had a tank that was no match to heavier German armor. Plus the doctrine. Tanks, the American ones, were supposed to support infantry. German tanks were supposedly dealt with Tank destroyers. But the Sherman had its qualities. It was faster, far more reliable than German machines and it was a match to the PZIV ...

[@harisminfaris]

desertbootguy It wasn’t faster at all. The Panther outclassed the Sherman in any aspect, including speed, vastly. The Sherman was a shit. But if you send tons of shit, you will cover even your enemy in shit.

[@harisminfaris]

Pelican1984 No Sherman tank defeated anything. Quantity unfortunately defeated quality. Get on with the facts.

[@grahamhoff3867]

The German soldier's where the best in the World.Always out numbered .

[@antiochusiiithegreat7721]

It depends on what division/unit you are talking about. Even Leibstandarte was low on quality officers due to the survivors going to Hohenstaufen and Hitlerjugend. A good amount of the Wermarcht troops in normandy were not even German but ost-truppen which made up much of the static troops defending the Atlantic wall. Panzer lehr was the best German divison in normandy. The Fallshirmjager and the SS and regular panzer divisions would be considered crack but most of the infantry and Luftwaffe field divisions had much to desire. Remember German weekly news isn't going to show you the raggedy ass security divisions pulling a shit cannon with a donkey.

[@MrUhwoody]

Bullschittense, sphincter boy.

[@davidmarshall1259]

the Sherman tank a FORMIDABLE WEAPON? that's got to be a laugh, it was probably THE worst tank of the whole of ww2. the good old Tommy Cooker,,,,,,,,

[@motomark9736]

The Sherman was faster and from the flank it did the job

[@alexandrkireenko3701]

it was not a formidable, but it also is not even in a top 10 worst tanks of WW2

[@paoloviti6156]

@@motomark9736 who told you that it was faster then the German tanks? First of all the German tanks had much better off road capability and did not sink so easily on wet/muddy fields not to mention that the Sherman tended to slip thanks to it's rubber pads and relatively narrow tracks. The great virtue of the Sherman aside it's overwhelming superior numbers was that it was very reliable whilst the big "cats" needed continuous maintaining and had very little spares...

[@paoloviti6156]

@Dillon Mcconnell the only reason that the Sherman did a good account in the Korean war was because it's superior tatics mostly handled by veterans but not head to head with the T-34 and regarding the Israeli war was using the super Sherman and again it's far superior tatics not to mention the very high reliability. The Sherman had never really solved it's relatively weak armour. How many Sherman has brewed up in Normandy with their puny cannon against the "cats"...?

[@Bfjdkdhfbkau]

In War thunder Shermans are best medium tanks :)

[@abundantYOUniverse]

5:03 Strudel Factory flattened and battered.

[@reginaldmcnab3265]

The Wehrmacht regardless of the numerical advantage of the enemy remained resilient and resolute!

[@reginaldmcnab3265]

Jebus Hypocristos! It took many countries to defeat Germany! Including 3 superpowers! But which army had never had their Vietnam! Maybe only those who never fought!

[@aquat715]

Tooth and nail, to the death. Brave men all of them

[@anakin924]

make Germany great again!!

[@compoturn1029]

You moron Germany never made it to the greatness you dream about.Started 2 world wars lost 2 world wars.

[@DocTommy1972]

@@compoturn1029 lost every war they started since 1871

[@hapeta24]

Donald? Is that you??

[@adobovs271]

@@hapeta24 hah hah how did you know?

[@morsecodetrollboxx6819]

Beat it fed

[@harisminfaris]

The comment about the Sherman tanks...lol. Indeed was the Sherman tank no threat at all for a PzKmpfw V, better known as the Panther, not to talk about the Tiger. But even the Tank IV, equipped with the 75 mm gun, was not in huge danger from Sherman tanks.

[@hellofolks1762]

until brits put a eighteen pounder on it and called it firefly

[@hastyone9048]

6:16...it is true German tanks were superior to US tanks, however, the Germans only built about 6500 vs American Sherman’s which numbered 56,000. With the number of tanks and equipment the US had it didn’t matter how well the Tigers were built. This was the problem for Germany with most of their equipment. Too few at the cost of better quality which does not win wars.

[@qualityorganics2774]

Maybe it's just me, but before I die I wanna see us all on good terms. It would be cool to learn good history about us all than bad history.

[@JimmyRJump]

In the end, Europe and the USA were lucky Germany was stupid enough to attack Russia. Had they not done that they would have won the war. The Germans DID have far superior weaponry but thanks to the losses suffered in Russia, they lacked the numbers to go against the sheer volume of soldiers the USA was able to bring. Hitler very early on started to believe his own fantasies of invincibility and that's what made him make stupid decisions. That and a lack of resources. The latter was the reason why the Tiger and King Tiger weren't put into production early on. Only in late 1944 was it decided to produce more but Maybach never developed an engine for those monster tanks and they had to put in the same engine the Leopard tanks had which was way too weak to get the Tigers to drive at a decent speed, especially in rough terrain, where the Tigers barely got to a measly 5mph...

[@carlosgallegos7363]

hermosos los stug y los panther, lo maximo. jejeje

[@vincegedeon6583]

Amazing footage😮

[@michaelthomas7178]

Krauts had superior equipment, what beat them was lack of petroleum products and uncel Adolf.

[@colemanjones4374]

I disagree that they had all around better equipment. There are many things that's other countries did just as well or better

[@hman99]

@@colemanjones4374 XDD WHICH ONE XDDD

[@michaelthomas7178]

@punkacesixxx Read a book.

[@hman99]

@punkacesixxx u guys probably jokin

[@hman99]

@punkacesixxx american shermans outclassed german panzer iv's (false), american bombard fly's outclassed german luftwaffe(false)

[@asjalane2289]

Excellent battle footage if you look closely you can see the pilot srrenderng...

[@nickestnick5017]

Maybe the archives aren’t available anymore but you should try an get some more video

[@Pudge4400]

I'm guessing that the SS unit pictured is likely the 17th SS GvB...given that they're operating with Fallschirmjägers?

[@MrAdamF]

Yes and the 12th SS division is on this film too because the 17th had no panthers

[@Pudge4400]

@@MrAdamF only StuG's, IIRC...?

[@notsosilentmajority1]

The Germans spread themselves far too thin and didn't have allies with enough resources, ability or in some cases......heart. Germany almost single handedly fought the entire world and if the US never got involved, they very well may have won. Even with the fact that Hitler had lost it by the end and gave orders that only got more of his own troops killed, they still almost pulled it off. These are impartial remarks, as I am glad we won the war but the truth is the truth.

[@AlexNicholls.]

Same could be said if the Soviets or British weren't in the scene, it took a combined effort. In the end the Americans got involved for the same reason the British did; they knew if they didn't go to it, it would come to them. Well it did come to them at pearl harbour I suppose.

[@notsosilentmajority1]

@@AlexNicholls. The Brits were basically involved from the beginning. Churchill approached FDR many, many times pleading for the US to enter the war. A lot of people forget that Russia was an ally of Germany when they invaded Poland early on and they signed a non aggression pact with Germany. The US didn't officially enter the war until they were attacked by Japan. Many people also do not realize that the US was supplying Britain with a lot of war supplies before entering the war and that the US even sent troops to Iceland to take over for the Brits before entering the war as well. Don't forget that someone would have had to eventually take on Japan if the US didn't enter the war. Who might that have been? Germany truly may have still won the war if the US had never sent war supplies to Britain early on and if the US didn't actually enter the war. This is just trying to be impartial. The bottom line is thankfully WE won together.

[@notsosilentmajority1]

@Jebus Hypocristos No one is talking about exterminating people or concentration camps, etc.. No-one said :exterminating people will cause you to lose wars". That's what you added. No one is taking sides for anyone here, it's simply about history. This is just about what people refer to as "war". What the Nazi's did beside traditional war is a different topic entirely and wasn't being discussed. Everyone knows exterminating people was/is wrong but it seems like some people have to automatically bring that into any conversation abut the Germans and WWll. There are plenty of videos and comments on the Nazi war crimes and crimes against humanity if that's what you're looking for. This wasn't one of them.

[@notsosilentmajority1]

@ASCALON Japan was almost its own war and the Italians became a liability that eventually switched to the ally side. Were the Balkan states and few others really a force to be reckoned with in the war? Can any compare to Canada, Australia, etc.? Germany didn't have an ally that was a huge asset............ once they turned on Russia. Russia was their ally when Poland was up for grabs though.

[@notsosilentmajority1]

@Jebus Hypocristos Yeah, HATE is a really bad thing.

[@smainouazene5561]

Malgré les forces alliées, les troupes allemandes leur ont tenu tête, des soldats courageux, ils faut le reconnaître.

[@browngreen933]

Great footage of history's finest army!

[@AnthonyEvelyn]

Nice. A historical video inadvertently tailor made for Wehraboos. All the fanatical defense of the Normandy Bocage was for naught. Allied forces broke out and kicked their asses back to the Rhine.

[@isabelsilva62023]

The commentary is in Portuguese sometimes, wonder if it is so with the whole reel. It is my language.

[@MrSniperdude01]

I love German engineering, especially before the days of shit labelled "German engineered" on the front, "made in China" on the back. It's stupid though to think that Quality can overcome vast Quantity. Russia could throw away troops like USA could throw away Shermans & bombers. Meanwhile Germany only made 1347 King Tigers (their strongest tank) capable of taking on soviet T34s

[@harisminfaris]

MrSniperdude01 Taking on T34? You must be kidding. A Tiger was not taking on T 34s, it swallowed them for breakfast. As well as all the other allied steel on wheel that was sent against them.

[@filmtajm35]

Please, don't forget, Germany was actually working on atomic bombs.

[@davidcole333]

Dont' forget Germany didn't have to transport vast numbers of material across oceans either...a large part of the reason why Sherman's were lighter. 3 weeks after the Americans hit Normandy an equally sized armada came ashore in the Marianas.

[@tomtom-yy2nb]

ขอไว้อาลัยต่อความสูญเสีย ของทั้งสองฝ่ายครับ ..

[@hgm8337]

The allies had plenty of time to regret their choice of the French bocage as a battleground, seems

[@dennisjones9044]

Shermans were a MEDIUM tank, they never were meant to go toe to toe with the German HEAVY tanks. The US stuck with the Shermans because beside reliability they could transport large numbers of them on ships and trains. To deal with German heavy tanks tank destroyers, air and artillery were used. The Brits did one more thing with there Sherman tanks by putting there "17 pounder" gun in them. AKA Sherman Firefly.

[@StratBurst92]

In one of the frames a German soldier has a British Enfield 303 sniper rifle.

[@phill9283]

At 1.16 the German soldier a British Lee Enfield sniper rifle with scope

[@mcfrosty8739]

6:22 everything they said was true then, except their quality just wasn't in enough numbers. But the Shermans were by far inferior to the heavy German tanks

[@gargara77]

Soviets did amazing job

[@wistonlawsons4443]

Why is there a narrator in portuguese?

[@danielcoetzee5793]

And the whole world fought to preserve the British Empire....!

[@danielcoetzee5793]

@Vincent Bate The fact that the British Empire didn't survive for much longer after WW11 does not negate the intent nor does it deter from the historical fact that it happened and the way in which it happened and the true reasons for why it happened. If you steal and get caught and it didn't "work out well for you" doesn't change the fact that you stole and broke the law in the first place and it doesn't undo your stealing! Follow your own advice and think before you post....! Before you make a fool of yourself!

[@hdinf3849]

Well That's true.

[@cliffordkiehl3959]

I have read that Hitler knew, as well as the Japanese, that it had to be a quick war. The plan was to have it won before the US industrial machine got going. During the first part of 1943 it was clear that the axis nations were going to lose. It's interesting that if Hitler had not declared war on the US, whether the US would have entered the European war since the people would have lobbied for the idea that the war with Japan was enough.

[@iggy9955]

German parashuter, well and any army is the best soldier in war

[@MrWolf-xk8sl]

Actually Rommel said that Italian soldiers were the best he saw. And I believe him too. Just imagine that majority of Italian soldiers were fighting for the hated Mussolini, and also got sent with scarce and cheap equipment of war (planes, cannons, tanks...). So they had to have a lot of guts to fight knowing that they couldn't compete against the Allies.

[@Ahornblatt2000]

The Sherman was crap there is no doubt.Those who served in the Sherman tank said the same

[@Ahornblatt2000]

@Dillon Mcconnell So I guess the guys who served in those Sherman's didn't know what they were talking about? IDF don't use the Sherman anymore not since 80s

[@robertsettle4749]

You do not know what your talking about and I do. DUMBASS!!!

[@robertsettle4749]

@Dillon Mcconnell Well it's not you.

[@Ahornblatt2000]

@@robertsettle4749 Well then is only one left and that is me but I don't see anything what is worth responding

[@robertsettle4749]

It's you Boomer!!!

[@davetorre1694]

If allies didn't have air superiority; they wouldn't have moved very far off the beaches.

[@Knochensack74]

Welcome in hell! We are the bouncer! Deutsche Fallschirmjäger!✊

[@amrotaha4650]

مين عربي بيتفرج هنا يخبط لايك

[@soso-222]

Amro taha هلا

[@amrotaha4650]

@@soso-222 هلا بك أخوي

[@soundblaweiterbla]

Interesting, the footage of German soldiers being commented on in English and presumably Russian. Who lies the most?

[@hbilha]

Its not russian. The original comments are in a strange mix of European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese. The comentator refers to the allies as the "enemy" and the nazis as "our troops", which leads me to believe its a portuguese footage, since Portugal had a fascist regime at the time of the war.

[@MrWolf-xk8sl]

@@hbilha yeah Portugal had Salazar

[@luismaravilla4665]

Germany lost due to poor leadership.

[@snigie1]

And not enough diversity, a mistake their correcting

[@akashsavangade518]

They lost because they fought alone with world's 3 superpowers

[@simonvirus6417]

The Sherman was a disgrace.

[@andrefoy713]

yah...and they lost war too.. after all that

[@michaelsteiner6500]

Michael Numbers matter!

[@utkarshtrivedi8870]

Allies won just bcoz of close Air support and outstanding artillery which both Germans lacked. If this would have been infantry battle Allied forces got no chance to win.

[@adicats]

Germany lost the war when they invaded Russia.

[@abotz5396]

@Dillon Mcconnell lol no

[@abotz5396]

@Dillon Mcconnell no they won after the battle of stalingrad and kursk which took most of the supplies of the german army also that speech was for diplomatic purposes or just american propaganda

[@abotz5396]

@Dillon Mcconnell also russia was rich of oil

[@abotz5396]

@Dillon Mcconnell no there were some good russian high commands like zhukov

[@abotz5396]

@Dillon Mcconnell also the soviets hated the british equipment.

[@SuperBajafresh]

And what happened; the Allies kicked your ass!

[@juanzulu1318]

What language does the original commentator speak? It is definately not German. Is this maybe German Wochenschau footage given to Axis client countries for their propaganda departments?

[@BewareOfTheKraut]

The original commentator would be German. The comment in the background is Portuguese.

[@jasschoob8726]

German quality will beat american quantity according to the propagandist narrating the film, well iam no fan of joe stalin but he did say quantity has a quality all its own

[@thongngo7574]

I am number one, that why the people never stop killing.

[@mustardseedoffaith7481]

See Kyle

[@JohnWilliams-ee5ly]

Pinky and the Brain?

[@TP-ie3hj]

The comment section is a sad collection of ignorant cliches. While German and its armed forces were very formidable as a fighting force they never had a chance. This is June of 1944. June 6 ! The war would be over in April 1945. 10 months later. The US entered the war with no real army Dec 1942. Built an Army 1943 equipped it, sent it overseas 1943 first half 44 and it fought for ten months from this footage. Never having been stopped, not once. The war was actually over for Germany by Jan 44. It took the US all of six to seven months to utterly defeat and destroy Germany. In the East it was the same story after 1942 a constant reduction in territory and resources. It is a falsehood to think Germany could have ever won the war. There is far more to war than what tank you bring or rifle you carry. In that arena Germany could never have hopped to compete.

[@mark_heck_1904]

Deutschland erwache endlich wieder

[@冴羽獠-t4j]

ロンメル元帥が見える。ロンメルはB軍集団司令官だったが、7月17日にイギリス軍機の機銃掃射を受け重傷を受けているから1944年の6月6日の連合軍のノルマンディー上陸の直後だとわかる。アメリカ軍シャーマン戦車の真正面をドイツ軍砲弾が貫通している。同戦車に対抗できなかった日本軍とは大違いだ。武装SS兵が銜えタバコで穴を掘る。ドイツ国防軍兵に交じって空軍降下猟兵も加わっている。イギリスのタイフーン戦闘機が見える。制空権がもう連合軍側にあるので、ドイツ軍の集団による作戦行動が難しくなっていることがわかる。

[@ebensee1244]

Ahora me doy Cuenta que no Hay Diferencias Entre judios y nazis ✌️

[@zamanium7517]

Слава вермахту

[@СергейСергей-ы4с1е]

Шоб ты обосрался

[@zamanium7517]

@@СергейСергей-ы4с1е Красава! Мне понравилось что ты написал! Лучшее что я читал. Молодец. Гениально!

[@rhodie33]

So great until they surrendered, lol.

[@dhss333]

Shermans Death/fire traps.

[@dhss333]

Check WW2 RECORD - STILL FIRE TRAPS.

[@dhss333]

The PershinG arrived in the final weeks of the war and saw little action. At least 1 was destroyed by a German Nasehorn tank, within Germany. Check the loss figures for Shermans - easily killed by ALL German tank types , assault guns & antitank guns & panzerfausts & panzerschreik bazookas And they burned very easily.

[@dhss333]

The Sherman is like paper to RPG & Kornet antitank weapons, as is even the Abram tank.

[@dhss333]

Check film Clips of RPGs 6 other infantry anti tank weapons 'torching' tanks in Syria, in 1 case a grenade down the tank cannon detonating breech Shell, fuel & ammo locker. Check film of Hezbulla Kornets destroying Israeli tanks in Lebanon offensive. Check out WW2 Sherman losses in Europe. FACTS, EVIDENCE!! And tidy up your spelling: LiterALLY not littery.

[@dhss333]

DIALOGUE CONCLUDED, ENDED.

[@Rennonetus]

the Sherman tank a FORMIDABLE WEAPON? lol just look at the documentary on the crew of these tanks, also available on youtube. The Allied propaganda made more deaths than anything else, lying to their soldiers, as well as the propaganda on the MG42 and many German weapons, which were described as inaccurate, realized the soldiers at their own expense that it was not at all so xD

[@m22gang65]

R3nN4 The Sherman was a pretty formidable tank to fight if you were fighting it in anything but a tiger, which were very rare to be seen.

[@Rennonetus]

@@m22gang65 mmm.... any 75mm German cannon was eble of pricing easily any allay tank and this cannon were in all panzer 4 and all stug 3 and 4 ,whit out counting all antitank PAK 88, 75, 50mm . And in all of this even the Panzers 3 whit the 50mm cannon was able of pricing the frontal armor basically the Sherman was butter.

[@m22gang65]

R3nN4 And the Sherman’s 75mm cannon could penetrate the front of the pz3, 4, panther and the stug

[@lndominustiger8494]

Yanquee go home ....lol

[@normanbuchanan6]

and then they met russia

[@Chiller01]

300th comment

[@johntaylor9320]

Propaganda on both sides.

[@matthiaselsser2865]

We were Fighting against 51 Countries...

[@franklipsky3396]

Who forced you ?scheistkopf

[@fuelbasti]

typical german propaganda film from its time. It is a good example how they have embedded filmmakers to the front.

[@bernhardjandl8956]

und warum wird er in englisch kommentiert

[@hdinf3849]

Well That's true.