Modelled using Rhinoceros 6.0. I'm not a professional 3D artist, just a hobby
Пікірлер: 124
@SashaTibelius2 ай бұрын
I remember historical day in November 1988 when Space Shuttle Buran flew to space for first mission. After two orbits Buran (Snow storm) landed in fully automatic mode.
@zendher2 жыл бұрын
The Buran its very similar to Space Shuttle, but the Energia its fantastic, a massive rocket.
@user-mt8rr3jk6q2 жыл бұрын
Based on the Energia rocket, it was planned to create a Vulcan rocket with a payload capacity of up to 200 tons. Instead of 4 side blocks with RD-170 engines, it was supposed to install 8, and also add a third stage. Currently, Russia is developing the Yenisei rocket, which is a continuation of work on superheavy missiles
@ErmolayNef2 ай бұрын
Существовал проект Шаттл-С, саrgo, тоже без "самолётика". Надо бы - сделали бы.
@tamchan273 жыл бұрын
No comparison needed, Buran is obviously better
@MuhammadRizal-dk9hn2 жыл бұрын
Agree
@PistonAvatarGuyАй бұрын
Because it trashed all of its engines every flight?
@VictorBorges2 жыл бұрын
Energia is so awesome
@TheAeroAvatar2 ай бұрын
Did you know there are attempts to bring it back?
@doodleboi70342 жыл бұрын
The Sad thing was that the Side boosters of Buran were to be Reusable. It was supposed to have Wings and it would glide back on a runway like a Glider.
@peabody30002 жыл бұрын
why is that sad? i have often wondered if wings would be better than powered landings for recovered rockets
@doodleboi70342 жыл бұрын
@@peabody3000 The Sad thing was that this was scrapped, and we don't know if we can make this again.
@strikevipermkII2 жыл бұрын
Thats Energia 2.0, but yeah. The main tank was also supposed to skip across the atmosphere and land as well.
@jesusramirezromo20372 жыл бұрын
That was Urgan (Energia 2.0), They planned on a fully reusable rocket The core would have delta wings and skip over the atmosphere, the boostets had deployavle wings
@PandoraPantam2 жыл бұрын
@@doodleboi7034 Well i have good news for you: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hmq7mWifrrGNabs
@Sergey62642 жыл бұрын
No doubt BURAN is the best!!!
@ErmolayNef2 ай бұрын
Ничем не лучше
@ClinchfieldRailfan2 ай бұрын
then you must be russian
@jackychai76263 жыл бұрын
buran is like the secound generation of space shuttle so it is very clear that buran is better
@masonrowden97303 ай бұрын
Nah it looks like a cheap Chinese knock off that tries to look better but just isn’t
@denzelklarenaar58832 ай бұрын
@@masonrowden9730 larger payload capacity, automatic landing and designed in a way that both sts disasters wouldn’t have happened
@ErmolayNef2 ай бұрын
Ничем не лучше, даже без многоразовых двигателей. То же поколение, удалось криво повторить через 7лет.
@ErmolayNef2 ай бұрын
@@denzelklarenaar5883грузоподъемность определялась заданием. Система автоматической посадки сделана ещё в 1955 для самолётов в США, но нужна ли так она... Катастрофы как с Шаттлами были возможны тоже.
@thomaswilson32012 жыл бұрын
Fucking yes bro! YES you are are on the right track to the future
@Krzysztof_z_Bagien2 жыл бұрын
That's a really nice job! Recently I started to read and watch stuff about Buran, so YT keeps recommending me jewels like this one; I guess the algorythm gets smarter :) Where did you get dimentions etc. from? And would you care to share those 3D models?
@energiam880 Жыл бұрын
I got them from scaled blueprints from a Russian forum.
@alexandrucornelnistor1572 Жыл бұрын
@@energiam880 Hello, could you be so kind to sent me the files for Energhia&Buran , these ones. I will try to make one in 3D , but I didn't find anyware such great detalis as you have. Please help me in this project. Many thanks in advance
@alexandrucornelnistor15728 ай бұрын
Hello Sir, I'm interested too for these plans...design....if I may. Could you be so kind to share with us, please. Many thanks in advance.
@sfsspearheadorbital51952 жыл бұрын
Buran is better but when the time of it's building process soviet union is.......let's say bankrupt 😅
@sqiush28762 жыл бұрын
People keep saying burin is better than the shuttle but the shuttle served 135 missions
@jerromedrakejr93322 жыл бұрын
Buran has only one mission, but not because it was bad, but because the state that made it ceased to exist. The shuttle ended its career due to well-known catastrophic events. Following the loss of two Space Shuttle missions, the risks for the initial missions were reevaluated, and the chance of a catastrophic loss of the vehicle and crew was found to be as high as 1 in 9. In other words - you have a better chance to walk across the minefield relaxed, with your hands in your pockets, unharmed than to survive the Space shuttle mission. P.S. Quantity and quality are two different things, although you Westerners have a habit of saying that quantity itself is a kind of quality.
@ValentinoDante3 жыл бұрын
Cool now put them in ksp
@misterkuda7042 жыл бұрын
While I like the Buran, I'm gonna be honest there that reminds me of the N1
@hugoflores58062 жыл бұрын
Its just soviet liquid propellant thechnology. From below it looks more like a soyuz
@odess4sd4d2 жыл бұрын
mOaR EngInEs
@sfsspearheadorbital51952 жыл бұрын
And the buran shuttle can take off......
@alexandrucornelnistor15728 ай бұрын
....both of them....
@lunarmodule7572 жыл бұрын
Buran is very underrated
@chrome5053 жыл бұрын
How many missions did Buran perform?
@LexaGamer-fc8jd3 жыл бұрын
Zero. The only flight it did was only testing.
@joaquinantonioarteta12052 жыл бұрын
the energia launched a military sat that crashed ( the sat not energia) the energia launced the buran once but it was a huge sucess
@BadmaOchirov502 жыл бұрын
Он один раз слетал в космос в автоматическом режиме...
@jesusramirezromo20372 жыл бұрын
Buran 1 Energia 2
@user-js3td1fq5dАй бұрын
Нужно бы снова восстановить буран, мрию, «каспийского монстра» и других и создать корабли даже лучше.. Все были рады развалу СССР но только спустя время многие начинают понимать что мы потеряли на самом деле😊
@ErmolayNef2 ай бұрын
Буран - гораздо более дорогая система без многоразовых двигателей.
@fixpontt2 жыл бұрын
there is only 1 reality and in this reality the Shuttle flew 135 times with humans on board and the Buran flew 0 times, there is no competition here, everything else is fictional
@energiam8802 жыл бұрын
That's lovely, but this isn't really an ego-measuring contest. It's just my artwork But thanks for your expert opinion anyway. However, think it's probably best if you kept them to your self :)
@fixpontt2 жыл бұрын
@@energiam880 my comment refers to the delusional commenters below me not your modelling work
@BadmaOchirov502 жыл бұрын
Неправда, Буран один раз слетал в космос в автоматическом режиме и он был явно лучше вашего шаттла
@jerromedrakejr93322 жыл бұрын
If you already insist on formalities: Buran had one mission. Buran's safety record is 100%. Shuttle's safety record is 98,52%. Buran has 0 losses, Shuttle has, how many, 14 lost lives? So far, 24 astronauts in American missions, 5 astronauts in Soviet and 1 astronaut in Russian missions have died.
@peabody30002 жыл бұрын
the soviets only had to fly it once to realize the basic design was far too expensive, impractical, and dangerous to be useful.. it took 30 years for the US to finally resign to that
@doodleboi70342 жыл бұрын
Seriously, US does not Accept anything.
@RideAcrossTheRiver2 жыл бұрын
Shuttle did more than any spacecraft ever did. It was a total loss to retire that capability.
@peabody30002 жыл бұрын
@@RideAcrossTheRiver anything shuttle ever did could have been done far more safely and cheaply, with other systems
@RideAcrossTheRiver2 жыл бұрын
@@peabody3000 What other systems?
@peabody30002 жыл бұрын
@@RideAcrossTheRiver systems that were and still are in use today.. soyuz, atlas, etc.. and to flip the question, what did shuttle ever do that those systems can't?
@ihatefiregod2 жыл бұрын
tau.
@RideAcrossTheRiver2 жыл бұрын
Buran was better? It flew two orbits, just 85,000 km, just once, and unmanned, almost 40 years ago.
@Sentinelvs2 жыл бұрын
Collapse of the Soviet Union stopped Buran progress. That is really sad :(
@kentershackle13292 жыл бұрын
Ya missed more, abt BURAN: all was done Autonomously. On way back, it senses flight line was a bit off, so flew over the airport and made 2nd attempt. Landed and even parked on its own, at the designated parking lot. 😂 Shes wayyy better.
@RideAcrossTheRiver2 жыл бұрын
@@kentershackle1329 Yeah, sure, no, it didn't. Also, pilots fly better.
@sqiush28762 жыл бұрын
I will with you
@jerromedrakejr93322 жыл бұрын
@@RideAcrossTheRiver WHAT "it didn't"!!!???? Buran did not fly on his own and made second approach when landing? Of course it did! You know nothing and it is obvious that you are obsessed with American superiority. You are nothing more than a complete waste of time ...
@TheSwanlake20092 жыл бұрын
When the space shuttle failed why didn't the United States buy the Russian space shuttle the Buran?
@BadmaOchirov502 жыл бұрын
Буран не российский, а советский космический челнок
@LadyNightFury12 жыл бұрын
I've heard that the NASA actually considered using the Buran after the Columbia disaster. But the only Buran that ever flew to space was destroyed by this time. All the other orbiter that never got completed got their components used for other projects, scrapped or abandoned.
@strikevipermkII2 жыл бұрын
Buran can get to the moon, so its better. By a lot.
@sqiush28762 жыл бұрын
Shush
@zeebas10142 жыл бұрын
Roblox king The great why? buran is superior in a lot of ways
@irakgarcia91883 жыл бұрын
I'm the only person that commented because I understand what does feel that you didn't have comments I feel an empty inside... and nice video 👍🙂
@thescientifichacker93992 жыл бұрын
To be Honest, Energia was way more complicated and Better than The space shuttle
@PandoraPantam2 жыл бұрын
Neat part is, it was less complicated, that´s the main reason why it was better
@konstantinioseliani20002 жыл бұрын
Buran has a lower percentage of returned parts. The number of engines on boosters speaks for this. The Chinese, when they copy Starship, will do the same.
@jesusramirezromo20372 жыл бұрын
Wich was actually an improvement The shuttle was MORE expensive to repair, than just use an expendable rocket The soviets made engines more powerfull and as efficient as the shuttle's, but far less complex and cheaper to build The Shutle engines where also dead weigth in orbit
@ildus_isyan30452 жыл бұрын
Буран -- наша гордость и боль. Ну могли же такое - великая страна была СССР!
@desertedgoatgamingАй бұрын
Unless you disagreed with a dictatorship or were "lesser race" according to Stalin at which point you were tortured, gulaged and/or killed ... kinda sounds like another Nazi Germany with a Hitler in power when you think about it like that.
@user-kg3gu5yl8t2 жыл бұрын
Buran was never used in a real mission so there is no comparison.
@BadmaOchirov502 жыл бұрын
Он вообще то один раз летал на орбиту Земли в автоматическом режиме и вернулся оттуда на аэродром, сомневаюсь что ваш шаттл был способен на это, так что глупости не пишите, раз не в курсе всего...
@jerromedrakejr93322 жыл бұрын
Every space flight is a MISSION!
@yurakondratuk2532 жыл бұрын
@@BadmaOchirov50 и толку, что он слетал? Мкс строили шатры, а не бураны.
@BadmaOchirov502 жыл бұрын
@@yurakondratuk253 тут под этим видео некоторые писали что он вообще не летал, поэтому и написал что он всё таки разок слетал, а причём тут строительство МКС? Речь вообще не о нем.
@yurakondratuk2532 жыл бұрын
@@BadmaOchirov50 у шатла был автопилот,на сколько я знаю. Так что приемущество автопилота очень спорное. Буран не стал рабочей лошадкой в космосе
@bulzzara2 жыл бұрын
BURAN .. THE BEST !!!
@allgood67603 жыл бұрын
Cool graphics!... I am amazed the Soviets copied the Space Shuttle.. it was done with Soviet spies 👍
@jimmy950we53 жыл бұрын
The design for the NASA space shuttle were made public, and the Soviets observed and improved from the Americans design.
@allgood67603 жыл бұрын
@@jimmy950we5 Space Shuttle 2.0..👍🇳🇿
@jimmy950we53 жыл бұрын
@@allgood6760 Indeed
@nopas773 жыл бұрын
The Energiya Super heavy rocket can take off over 100 tons into the space. Space Shuttle it is not a rocket at all. Energiya can fly without Buran. Surprise! Can the orange fuel tank fly without Space Shuttle? Definitely not. Yep, Soviet engineers was copy body and wings, like Formula One copy your family van :) four tires, steering system, drivers chair, pedals on the floor, engine. Obviously if you do not see deeply than F1 and van are same thing. And Buran was completely automatic space craft from 1988! Think about it. Soviet Union can do it. And now nobody have it and can`t make system automatic landing. Maybe soon. Maybe. Buran touch down in automatic mode without engine with hard crosswind making its own decision due to the changed weather for additional maneuver. When Columbia have disaster and Space Shuttle program have been closed (NASA?) think about resurrection Buran. But they don`t do that after counting money and effort. Well, Soviet Union build it, others can`t repair it. Ahhh! One more I just remember. The fuel for Energia was oxygen and hydrogen. Energiya is first from series super heavy rocket for Lunar expansion. I understand you, you are offended that this system was not created in your country and not your engineers. But right now, it's just a history. Relax.
@pixel66983 жыл бұрын
The Buran was a heavily improved Space Shuttle. It fixed many of the Shuttle's fatal flaws and could even land automatically. The Energia rocket which the Buran would launch on could even fly without the Buran, allowing for much heavier payloads.
@sqiush28762 жыл бұрын
They also stole the shuttle
@BadmaOchirov502 жыл бұрын
Никто ничего не крал, это собственная разработка СССР
@anwarmalik6652 жыл бұрын
Soviet technology is best
@RadioNostalgia2 жыл бұрын
Totally UNUSEFUL!
@user-lq9hp1kd8o2 жыл бұрын
Такую страну прое#бали
@user-wu8kn7fx5i2 жыл бұрын
СССР USSR 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 США USA 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎