correction: So I misread the picture I was referencing for this build, so the two jet engines I put down are actually rocket engines. No jet engines were present on the Buran that went to orbit irl to my knowledge. I may be wrong so let me know if I got that wrong. Also, it was pointed out to me that the side boosters are slightly offset away from the the buran.
@gamesonly403 жыл бұрын
Ohh lemme fix the craft file 😂
@armandomelko32663 жыл бұрын
@Piolet1549 the buran was originally meant to have the same jet engines as a fighter jet and was supposed to have 2 of them but they weren't enough so they went for 4 but they couldn't shield it from reentry heating so they dropped the jet engine idea
@kerbal82163 жыл бұрын
Piolet1549 you should use 5m for your space shuttle too
@kerbalstar53093 жыл бұрын
i found out that if one of your landing gear "can't deploy while stowed" to fix this enable on the landing gear "deploy shielded" it will deploy anyway
@collinlamont63573 жыл бұрын
Enerigia Buran was probably better in my opinion because it didn’t need a crew and it had jets. But Nasa did a fine job landing without jets. However both shuttles were flawed with the heat shields. The only reason the Buran had jets was for ksp players to have a better time landing it🤣
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
yeah, the soviets definitely made it easier for KSP players lol
@liquidhype30253 жыл бұрын
Yeaa no, the turbofan engines are supposed to go on the side of the fuselage, not at the back. The Buran use two RD-58s engines at the rear for orbit insertion and for de-orbiting. Buran never flew with the turbofan engines, only Ptichka did during test flights, and it had to use four turbofans, not 2. Also two of the Zenit boosters were offset by 13,3 degrees and two of the boosters 30 degrees. They were not attached symmetrically opposite. Also the RD-0120 engine were not in line with the fuel tank itself, they were offset toward the payload (in this case being the Buran). So there is a bunch of stuff wrong in this tutorial.
@bobbybobby43 жыл бұрын
I’ve got to say, I was trying to come up with a counter argument to this. And I couldn’t come up with one. Obviously the research was not up to snuff for this one.
@dbneptune3 жыл бұрын
Oh no, too much knowledge!!!
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
I made a pinned comment addressing a few inaccuracies
@collinlamont63573 жыл бұрын
Nice research!
@liquidhype30253 жыл бұрын
@@bobbybobby4 Why would you need to counter argument? It's not like it is up for discussion. Nothing I said was made-up hokus pokus where its factual validity needed to be determined.
@juno_miaou3 жыл бұрын
Bran Flakes/Energy
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
neat
@aliteralpothole92053 жыл бұрын
I made an Energia replica before but I wanted to use the mammoth/vector engines because the energia core stage had 4 engines that were basically Soviet rs-25s. For the RD-170s, I used 4 reliant engines on a 1.8 m side tank. Side note: reliant and swivel engines make amazing early game engine clusters. 4 reliants and a swivel is more powerful than a vector.
@MrSlyFox3 жыл бұрын
Just a quick reminder. It wasn't a failure. It was a huge success, later cancelled due to budget cuts
@bobbybobby43 жыл бұрын
Just because it made it to orbit one time doesn’t mean that it was a “huge success.” Actually, given the amount of money put into the project and the fact that it never launched a single payload I would be inclined to say it was a failure.
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
do you think the space shuttle was a huge success?
@armandomelko32663 жыл бұрын
Well I mean not as successful as say falcon 9 but more sn8 type successful where it just successfully demonstrated flight capability
@MrSlyFox3 жыл бұрын
@@bobbybobby4 Not a single one? Well, Polyus was a thing. We're talking about Energia-Buran, not just the orbiter. There's a comment somewhere in here, that describes it perfectly. It was like SN-8. Doing more, than expected and successfuly proving it's capabilities.
@MrSlyFox3 жыл бұрын
@@armandomelko3266 Yep, that is it
@navalca96863 жыл бұрын
I feel like this is the fastest growing (ksp) channel I have ever seen so I think you’re good for that sub goal
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
yeah, the growth has been pretty crazy
@radonsider96923 жыл бұрын
It is not failed. It just, got forgotten with the collapse of the USSR. And it is not a copy. The shape and colors are similar because it is very good for gliding and flying + the colors are the heat resistant tiles
@skeire13 жыл бұрын
I was literally just looking for a tutorial on this yesterday
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
well thats convenient lol
@iraelliott11913 жыл бұрын
You're charming. I do watch most of your videos for entertainment. I enjoy you showing us your take on these different re-creations. I also enjoy your detail that you give, you have plenty of content! New subscriber here, hope it helps!
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
thanks!
@Shiwo_23 жыл бұрын
This is cool 10/10 I tried making one lol Edit:I use simple rockets mobile :)
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
thanks
@treeo61143 жыл бұрын
Evacuate the city, engage all defensives, and get this man more subscribers
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
:)
@MikoyLanguidzАй бұрын
@@Piolet1549 :-)
@FlukyMeteor3 жыл бұрын
I normally watch ur tutorials for an actual tutorial but I’m on a trip and I didn’t bring my laptop so now it’s just for entertainment
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
coolz
@XIndependent773 жыл бұрын
Another great tutorial! Keep up the great work!
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
thanks! I will!
@MrKobe20112 жыл бұрын
The fact that NASA could land without jet engines is mental. They’d have to calculate precise timing on deorbit burns taking into account drag from the atmosphere and line up perfectly with a runway on the other side of the world. Incredible they only lost 2 shuttles tbh.
@justjane_music3 жыл бұрын
I did my first stream a few days ago. Was hard cause i have the intellect of a newborn child
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
XD
@mjw9073 жыл бұрын
I didn't watch this video for a tutorial just to see a Buran in KSP and learn about it more.
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
noice
@Fabelaz2 жыл бұрын
>Energia can be launched without accompanying shuttle. >to achieve it, it must have engines of its own "Energia is worse because engines are on the booster itself". Meanwhile I wish there still was documentation on this super heavy rocket.
@Saturn_573 жыл бұрын
Thanks man! Now i can make some space stations with more style 😎
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
np, glad you found the tutorial hellpful!
@Rando4233 жыл бұрын
I want an n1 tutorial
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
coming soon
@odstwingman3 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't really call it failed, it worked fine. The Soviets just didnt really have a need for it and realized that shuttle type spacecraft really arent a good idea.
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
I would argue that spending 10+ years making something, use it once and then realizing it was a bad idea is a pretty big failure lol
@odstwingman3 жыл бұрын
@@Piolet1549 they got a good bit of use out of energia just not buran
@bobbybobby43 жыл бұрын
@@odstwingman if by good use you mean two launches then I guess they got good use out of it...
@abutler753 жыл бұрын
And it was to expensive for them because it was when the Soviet Union was falling as a economy
@lorismartinoperfetto69083 жыл бұрын
Remember us when you'll have 150k subs
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
I hope I will
@lorismartinoperfetto69083 жыл бұрын
@@Piolet1549 just remember who supported you from the beginning! Great content mate, keep it up
@TheBobert5673 жыл бұрын
I watch your vids for entertainment. Also, when trying to get the centre of thrust from a particular engine thru the Centre of weight, disable all other engines so the arrow will show the CoT of those engines.
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
thanks
@gonkdroid4prez5393 жыл бұрын
N O I C E
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
:)
@athallamuraxeladhista6a9283 жыл бұрын
Awsome
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
thanks!
@blackops25413 жыл бұрын
Your tutorials are awesome man! Surely you can do Vostok at some point?
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
thanks! I'll look into vostok
@racingmhf91573 жыл бұрын
Please do a tutorial to how to install flags in ksp
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
sure
@firefly28063 жыл бұрын
If you have steam version go to C:/Program files 86x/Steam/Steamapps/common/Kerbal Space Program/Game data/Squad/Flags
@racingmhf91573 жыл бұрын
@@firefly2806 Thank you, it worked!
@DALTvideos3 жыл бұрын
Are you going to do a superheavy tutorial? I made a starship but I have no superheavy
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
maybe
@Tony-lh3ce3 жыл бұрын
nice
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
thanks
@Yaobi-San3 жыл бұрын
The launch could have "radial out" sas so it would be more stable
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
I tried that, SAS was actually under correcting so radial out was not working
@Yaobi-San3 жыл бұрын
@@Piolet1549 Oh ok
@theyounghistorian57913 жыл бұрын
I have an idea for you next video. You should make the aircraft that would carry the space shuttle!
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
that could be pretty cool
@aidenbrewster42093 жыл бұрын
Haha so funny story on Xbox I was thinking “why not make the buran with his old tutorial “ as I complete my buran *notification* How to create the buran *realize every mistake I made * FU- (made on Xbox and I think the energia looks awesome anddddddd yours flys better)soooooooo nice vid and yeah
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
lol. Glad you liked it!
@scottwilliams8462 жыл бұрын
Question about the Buran. Weren't the jet engines supposed to be side mounted like you take the mk0 liquid fueselage, add a Juno engine and an intake, and put four of them, one either side of the tail fin and one either side centered? And what were the stronger vacuum engines? Were there?
@5ns3 жыл бұрын
always here #5 +
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
E P I C
@Gino-Joaquin-Ratto2 жыл бұрын
No fue fallido porque funciono muy bien, el gobierno dijo que no lo podia mantener en uso, pero el transbordador funciono.
@wobblewarfare44943 жыл бұрын
amazing
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
thanks
@MrKobe20112 жыл бұрын
Lol at people who think Buran was better than the Space Shuttle. On what basis ? One unmanned TestFlight lasting less than a day? The Shuttle was a flawed program but it brought some of the greatest achievements in human space exploration with it. You wouldn’t have the Hubble without the space shuttles ability to upgrade and repair in orbit. The ISS would not have been nearly as robust without the space shuttles controlled flight capability. The Shuttle was an amazing machine. Buran was an interesting concept vehicle. The fact it could be remote operated doesn’t make it better. What is the point of an unmanned shuttle anyways? The Soviets wanted to prove their engineering was on par with the NASA. It was a concept vehicle and nothing more. It was never even rated for human space flight. Life support systems were some of the most complicated aspects of the shuttle. The world will not be building anything with the capabilities the shuttle had in LEO anytime soon.
@Elgoblino2 ай бұрын
I aint reading allat
@gamesonly403 жыл бұрын
I think you forgot to put a monopropellant tank for rcs
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
there is monoprop included in the MK3 cockpit :)
@raphaelantonrainer3 жыл бұрын
Superior Tutorial
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
do ya now
@fallofboots3 жыл бұрын
Oh I almost forgot I asked Matt Lowne to sub to you. I hope he does!
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
I doubt it, but it would be awesome if he did!
@Sean-pd7jd3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
:)
@Sean-pd7jd3 жыл бұрын
@@Piolet1549 remember me saying "Buran now"
@racingmhf91573 жыл бұрын
"piolet" would be "pilot" misspelled?
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
correct
@rollrollenbeck32673 жыл бұрын
I saw the real one in Germany!
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
noice
@vma0253 жыл бұрын
I just watch these tutorials for fun, I’m not good enough to recreate these
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
well, hope you've been liking them :)
@walkaros3 жыл бұрын
try to make Falcon 9!
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
sure
@illbeback.baby.3 жыл бұрын
Ты конечно не Глеб Лозино-Лозинский, но у тебя точно получилось повторить
@pokepro17733 жыл бұрын
PeRRRRRfect RRRRussian english
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
XD
@hiyathea3 жыл бұрын
He says "byuran" yet it is written as "буран" which is pronounced as "buran"
@GDR0073 жыл бұрын
Never can tell if he is saying Big S or big Ass tail fin.
@kalpanaanubhav3 жыл бұрын
Hey it's not failed but a much better space shuttle
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
The soviets spent billions of dollars developing the buran/ energia and it delivered zero tons to orbit... so I would call it a failure, but I could see the counter argument
@Elgoblino2 ай бұрын
@@Piolet1549 Time was the main factor, if the Soviet Union collapsed 30 years later, it may have been pretty successful...
@space_man60353 жыл бұрын
What Is Buran I have Never Herd Of It
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
it's pretty epic
@space_man60353 жыл бұрын
Ok
@bruhempty2733 жыл бұрын
20th comment 67th like
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
E P I C
@scottwilliams8462 жыл бұрын
I watch the tutorials for tutorials.
@michagrill94323 жыл бұрын
Well here you gotte say not the buran itself failed but the soviet union since it collapsed before the buran could be used again 🤣
@kerbal82163 жыл бұрын
Why you waiting piolet is live streaming
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
lol
@sirjeffels40203 жыл бұрын
I feel like you are complaining about only getting 60 subs per day.
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
relative scale is important. I probably am complaining. Because a while ago I was getting 100+ a day and now that I am getting less I feel like I'm doing something wrong
@sirjeffels40203 жыл бұрын
@@Piolet1549 well then don't complain about the viewers, watch your old videos and see anything different in those which are not in the recent ones. clickbait titles, video length, thumbnail, quality of content, etc. Besides, these types of videos have a relatively small audience, so you should expect slower subscriber growth once you reach a few thousand subs.
@gamesonly403 жыл бұрын
Bburan fully reusable lol
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
I should...
@Geekman9193 жыл бұрын
Biran now bouran
@Dazzxp3 жыл бұрын
triangle thing looking thing, scientific or what? lol
@Andrian_Lykashevih_3 жыл бұрын
Я пытаюсь очень долго построить подобный шатл это мучительно
@Andrian_Lykashevih_3 жыл бұрын
Я обычно обычный челенджер на взгляд делал. Получалось очень за правду. Но ракета не смогла полететь. Слишком мелкая мягко говоря была. И ещё Оказывается буран на видео стоит на 100 кредитов дешевле чем мой челенджер. О как хотя кроме двигателей вектор там дорого нет
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
I'm just going to pretend I know russian lol
@david_eldios_3 жыл бұрын
you are people?
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
am I people?
@david_eldios_3 жыл бұрын
@@Piolet1549 what are people
@leonamvonborowsky75596 ай бұрын
I miss my ex so much
@bobbybobby43 жыл бұрын
Am I first?
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
it would appear so
@wobblewarfare44943 жыл бұрын
42
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
42
@freecandy64483 жыл бұрын
Video should have ended at 16:50. Just like the real world shuttle. Unrealistic, dislike. Fake news.
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
If that is a reference to something, I very much do not know it lol
@freecandy64483 жыл бұрын
Yeah I was just calling it fake news because yours flew, while the real one never did. 😂
@a1001ku3 жыл бұрын
@@freecandy6448 If I'm not wrong, a test article flew, right?
@aedanpedro48063 жыл бұрын
2:32 I like that😍💋 💝💖❤️
@Piolet15493 жыл бұрын
do ya know
@ieatdirtwasntavailable3 жыл бұрын
I downloaded the craft file ad its the same type as the V-2 rocket, did that V-2 that I sent you work?