SpaceX New Raptor V3, V4 Totally Shocked NASA and Russia Scientists!

SpaceX New Raptor V3, V4 Totally Shocked NASA and Russia Scientists!
===
#techmap #techmaps #elonmusk #starshipspacex #spacex
===
SpaceX New Raptor V3, V4 Totally Shocked NASA and Russia Scientists!
1) SOURCES OF IMAGES AND VIDEOS
Everyday Astronaut: / erdayastronaut
/ everydayastronaut
TijnM : / m_tijn
/ @tijn_m
iamVisual:
/ visual_iam
/ @iamvisualvfx
C-bass Productions: / cbassproductions
TheSpaceEngineer: / mcrs987 / @thespaceengineer
Evan Karen: / @evankaren
Tamás Török ( Tamas Torok ): / @tomket7
LabPadre Space: / labpadre
/ labpadre
Robossbomb: / robossbomb
www.youtube.co...
C-bass Productions: / cbassproductions
Ryan Hansen Space: / ryanhansenspace
/ ryanhansenspace
Callum: / hisdirtremoves
Alexander Svan: / alexsvanart
/ @alexsvanart
Lewis Knaggs: / @lewisknaggs
/ lewisknaggs42
/ @joshlowespace
YannRaptorV3
/ yannraptorv3
Stanley Creative: / @stanleycreative
ErcX: / ercxspace
ErcX Space / ercxspace
SpaceXvision: / spacexvision
===
SpaceX New Raptor V3, V4 Totally Shocked NASA and Russia Scientists!
Unlike someone who got paid 33 million dollars each year for doing nothing, Elon Musk contributes a lot to the commercialization of space travel.
It could even be said that what he has done for the rocketry is worth many times more than the money he received as CEO of SpaceX.
And one of his most memorable creations is the incredibly powerful Raptor rocket engine that powers the gaint Starship rocket.
Not only does it possess advanced technologies such as a full-flow staged combustion cycle, and the use of the futuristic propellant methalox, but it has also been significantly upgraded to become more modern and powerful.
SpaceX New Raptor V3, V4 Totally Shocked NASA and Russia Scientists!
Indeed, SpaceX recently blew the public away with the debut of a new masterpiece, the Raptor 3, which promises to be a turning point in Starship's development stage.
Find out everything in today's Techmap episode.
But before we begin, let's subscribe to the channel to stay up-to-date with the latest space news.
In response to Tory Bruno’s comments on X, Elon Musk swiftly posted a test image of the Raptor 3 with the caption: “Raptor 3 first firing today.” He followed up with a tweet showcasing ULA CEO Tory Bruno’s comment, accompanied by a brief message: “lol.” Musk provided further clarification in another tweet: “All the small plumbing & wiring had to be deleted or incorporated into the primary structure because Raptor 3 will have no heat shield. Also, all parts have to be actively cooled in some way, so we added regenerative cooling where there was no existing fluid or gas flow.”
SpaceX New Raptor V3, V4 Totally Shocked NASA and Russia Scientists!
Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's President, took a more direct approach. She shared a Raptor 3 test image with a tweet: “Works pretty good for a ‘partially assembled’ engine :)”. Her tweet highlighted the phrase “partially assembled,” referencing Tory Bruno’s previous comment.
On August 3, SpaceX knocked the fans's socks off with the updates and image of Raptor Version 3. The company also didn't forget to compare the new version to two previous ones to highlight its notable features.
The performance statistics for the SpaceX Raptor engines have shown significant advancements across the different versions.
The first one is thrust increase. Raptor 3 with 280 tons of force improved thrust by 50 over Raptor 2 and 95 over Raptor 1.
By comparison, the closest engine to the Raptor that uses a phased combustion cycle with methane and oxygen is the BE-4 engine, which is expected to produce about 245 tons of thrust.
The special version 3 surpasses the popular rocket engines such as RS-25 with 190 tons. The RD-180 has 390 tons of thrust at sea level - but uses two combustion chambers and two nozzles, reducing the Thrust-to-Weight Ratio to 77.26, much lower than 183.6 of Raptor 3.
===
Subcribe TechMap: tinyurl.com/3z5...

[@falvegas511]

Guess it doesn't take much to SHOCK NASA These Days. Space-X Should Write NASA's Business Plan For The Next Year.

[@techmap9]

😂😂😂

[@JamieZero7]

We need to start getting rid of the public sector jobs. It's job to do nothing stealing money that would be more useful to the individual.

[@roguemajin46290]

can u imagine what he would have done with all the funding they gave out i get they want to try to be fair but clear the other 2 have no right to build ships

[@erikowren7894]

We would already be back on the moon.

[@RepRapper]

@@roguemajin46290 Yes we can always hitch a ride with the Russians again. Like we had to when the space shuttle got shut down. Or we could develop two rockets and use the other one for an emergency.

[@12HedmanLane]

They received funding to deliver a payload and crew transport system for nasa, which they have fulfilled. That's how contracts and business work. How are Boeing and BO doing? Cry harder haters

[@douglasengle2704]

A future Raptor engine at 330 metric tonnes thrust would be nearly half the thrust of a Saturn V F1 engine of 680 metric tonnes thrust (1.5 million pounds). The F1 engine was initially troubled with chronic combustion instability causing it to blow up which the V2 rocket engine did not experience. The claimed fix was placement of vanes in the combustion chamber, but as secret as rocketry is that might only be the visible part of the fix.

[@OldBillOverHill]

Each F1 was hand crafted by very skilled machinists. They are now all dead as are most of the engineers. Children playing with their daddy's toys.

[@peterclarke3020]

In that case you also ought to compare the sizes and masses, and chamber pressures of the engines too.

[@КириллКонышев-м2ы]

@@peterclarke3020 для них ракетный двигатель измеряется только в тяге , а на остальное им побоку.

[@michaelaischmann5265]

105 kg saved per Raptor engine times 33 engines per booster means a dry mass reduction of 3.465 tonnes (not 36 tonnes) for the booster.

[@BrianGochnauer]

I took it as; the reduction of mass of 33 engines + the increase in thrust of 33 engines = 36 tonnes of payload increase.

[@rtzx12570]

Don't forget the reduction in weight due to no heat shield needed with raptor 3

[@randyyoung9832]

THE ULTIMATE KING OF OUR COSMOS, GOD OF ISRAEL, IS THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY, HE CONSTRUCTED OUR WORLD THROUGH THE SPOKEN WORD ONLY. LET THAT SINK, IN OUR MINDS. HE,PERSONALLY WILL RENEW IT AGAIN.

[@jomdizon6930]

Amen praise be to God through Jesus Christ 🎉

[@richb2229]

I can see hundreds of Optimus robots being carried to the Moon and then to Mars to do Moon Base Alpha and Mars Base Alpha initial construction. This would greatly lower the risk especially with the Mars mission. And would almost guarantee the success of a lunar base.

[@markgarvey5859]

The rocket engine that take man. To stars. Thanks Elon. GOD BLESS UNITED STATES AN THE PLANET

[@twincams350]

Elon Musk is like a real-life Tony Stark!

[@seventhson27]

100,000 tons of thrust would be enough to launch a Nimitz-class.

[@joelmann5379]

I'm getting a "Star Blazers" vibe from this post.

[@bobwferguson]

It’s really quite remarkable

[@techmap9]

This can change everything when it appears

[@dreadous]

Wow that's incredible. It's like you have to science it up to understand it. Then simplify it to its most basic efficient robust form.

[@techmap9]

Thanks for sharing. We will better my content. Have a nice day ❤️❤️❤️

[@peterclarke3020]

Improved Thrust by 50% (Percent). NOT by x50 - which would be 5,000% Please use the correct math labelling.

[@superdivemaster]

Good Video !!!

[@techmap9]

My honor, thanks

[@kurtjensen7264]

Clearly. SpaceX is setting the standard for present and future space flight.

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Excellent stuff bro, go Elon

[@techmap9]

❤️❤️❤️

[@krewline2104]

The best parts are no parts. impressive.

[@garylester3976]

I'm wondering with the regenerative cooling if Raptor 3 engines might not pick up a slight measurable amount of thrust from the heat backwash from the engine plumes.

[@markcash2]

Being the first to comment on this is such a major achievement!

[@techmap9]

🥰🥰🥰

[@Etheoma]

raptor chamber wall might have the highest heat flux of anything ever made... A Nuclear bomb, a regular bomb, rotating detonation engine combustion chambers... I really could go on.

[@techmap9]

Thanks for sharing

[@mrbill2600]

Once in orbit, Starship can drag as many refueling ships, housing, ships, and any other necessities it wishes in one trip to the moon or Mars. It can leave the refueling and housing ships in orbit above the moon or Mars and move them to the ground as needed. Very economical and environmentally friendly. A man of the ages with vision.

[@charleygibbs5900]

How much could Starship put in leo if you strapped 2 to 4 reusable Falcon 9 boosters along side?

[@Future2024]

With the engines and greater power can landing legs be placed and have more missions on earth

[@charleygibbs5900]

If Blue Origin can’t keep up with deliveries to the Vulcan rocket, perhaps SpaceX can make a bundle supplying ULA with engines.

[@jamescorvett]

It doesnt take much to shock, or confuse, nasa or russia. And I'd bet $ if it wasnt for SpaceX patents , which are opensource, everyone else would still be in the stone age of rocket science. And we are only seeing version 3, when Im sure they are working on vers 4 and 5

[@PlanXV]

They are working on version 300 😊 which is 15 years away and version 1000 to mars 😮

[@RepRapper]

@@jamescorvett First of all I like Space X. But they were not the first to land a rocket. That was Grumman. Space X used NASA technology that was all open source to do what they have done. They have also had more failures than the rest of the rocket industry combined. And lately the most successes. My point is Space X built upon the success of those that came before.

[@Boris_Chang]

TECH MAP is just an AI ripoff using other peoples’ content and an annoying computer-generated voiceover. “Don’t Reccomend Channel”!!!

[@lcstarchaser]

Why put flaps on space tankers? If they're gonna stay up there, remove flaps use tonnage for bigger storage tanks and fuel

[@techmap9]

Thanks for cmt

[@richardpark3054]

Gee! I wonder why SpaceX didn't think of that!

[@schawo2]

weight reduction of 36 tons? Nope. 3,6 tons

[@Upheval]

And the Raptor 3 parts have been HIP'ed.

[@tomanycooks]

Im shocked

[@serchsource8744]

what Elon thinking and doing is what the U.S Military is doing in their UFO technology!!

[@OldBillOverHill]

You have no idea.

[@Slipnslide222]

The U.S IS actually using SpaceX for SpaceForce...(opps , did I say that?)😁

[@dani_1998]

bro its 2 video cutted to one, you have an intro like 7:00

[@jeffsmith9384]

It is clear that humanity is playing a roguelike RTS hybrid...

[@DanielJeffers-y3x]

spacex raptor engines can be used to build worlds first man made ufo

[@bearlemley]

Crap, I clicked on this ! Funny that they referred Elon as ‘CEO’ of SpaceX. How about OWNER? Or Founder - Owner? Yes he has gotten capital from others that have helped so Owner, head of engineering, and ceo?

[@spyder5571]

Some things like his engine innovation should not be shared. Certain things you just keep to yourself.

[@techmap9]

Why???

[@vXAnnonymousXv]

Competitors are gonna have a fun time copying all that plumbing you can’t see anymore

[@cannotsay5505]

nothing here is shocking STOP WITH THE CLICK BAIT

[@namei8967]

It is shocking especially the partially assembled engine really works!

[@paulreinicke6366]

The shocking thing is that the Boeing CEO makes $33 million/yr.

[@dennisFarmer1993]

What if it's shocking to him?

[@madara12regio]

Theres so many channel like this they using stupid thumbnail clickbait. They using elon musk face and nasa administration. A channel like this is stupid and must reported

[@Slipnslide222]

Why you watch??- get a job

[@alexanderfederowicz]

Elon, I think it's very good that you are advancing chemical rocket technology or CRT... However let's keep our eyes on proper gravity drives we know factually that those have existed since the 1960s from reverse engineering and we know factually that Germany apparently reverse engineered them in laboratories underground in Poland.... the facilities are still visible to this day.... Those who do not understand scientific method or true technology will think this is a theory not a concrete fact and they'll have to remain in their states of abysmal ignorance likely for the rest of their natural lives. What I'm discussing here Elon boils down to right hand rule and allowing physics to progress beyond the horse-drawn carriage and the internal combustion engine which has been kept in place by lethal force for the last 150 years.

[@richlisola1]

Elon is an engineer, his gifts are applied science and business-It’s up to the theoretical and applied physics folks to advance new theories that are testable and applicable-Once those come through, Elon and those like him will build new modeled spacecraft. But the physics is not Elon’s sphere.

[@NormalNonsense]

Awful AI narration.

[@OldBillOverHill]

Bull!

[@mikem6549]

GAINT is giant..

[@techmap9]

Thanks

[@idiocracyBonanza]

Another robotic voice channel

[@JerryLockridge-v6c]

Why don’t they use the Raptor engine in Falcon 9 ?

[@techmap9]

Interesting question. Anyone can answer?

[@JerryLockridge-v6c]

I know the old saying, If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. I also understand that it has been approved for human carry and is the cash cow for SpaceX. But it seems that there would be some major advantages to developing a version with the more powerful Raptor engine. Bigger payloads to higher orbit while recovering the rocket for reuse. Maybe it’s too much trouble for not enough gain but it seems that the improvements to the new Raptor engine would make it worthwhile to put them on a new Falcon.

[@fakestory1753]

flacon 9 burns different type pf propellent, you can't just use raptor engine on it

[@JerryLockridge-v6c]

It wouldn’t be a simple engine swap, the new fuel requirements would be some real changes just to change fuel storage and other changes to pump and ignite the different fuel. That is the question, would it be worth a new version of the Falcon rocket in order to use a Raptor engine with all its benefits or would it be to much trouble for the possible gain ?

[@richardpark3054]

Because they would have to change its name to 'Falcon 2'.

[@billparkison5042]

You have a Halo above your head

[@curtbrown9702]

My prediction. ONE DAY THE ENGINES WILL PASS UP THE ROCKET, LIKE A TIRE ON THE HIGHWAY. THEY WILL END UP IN FRONT OF YOU😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@andrewking7919]

In all this I heard, "the stripped down v3 engine will be much more difficult to repair" as if this was a bad thing. Ever heard of Plug & play? if it breaks swap it out. apparently raptor Engine changes can be done pretty quickly and they will have lots of them lying around. This is not new, back in the 1980's Volvo was working on a sealed truck engine, that is you just bolted it into the truck, and away it would go for a million miles. no oil changes no servicing no nothing just bin the engine and throw in a new one when it reached the target mileage. I dont know if they ever managed it as I never kept up with the industry when I left but as we "progress" throwaway components are the thing these days When was the last time you heard of a mechanic "fixing" say an alternator? just get a new one its easier, quicker and eventually cheaper.

[@PlanXV]

You can recycle it to shred it and 3 d print from the shredded parts

[@douglaswilkinson5700]

I still prefer the Saturn V's F1 engines.

[@richardpark3054]

Why?

[@Yourmomh0u5e]

He's a hater that's why

[@odysseusrex5908]

They could only fly once.

[@Leontestedevorant]

Except klickbite it's OK.

[@Nelis1324]

There is no v4...

[@XCX237]

Elon talked about raptor 4 at his presentation

[@brettmciver432]

Yet !!! Finished your comment for you. I expect v4 is already being tested and v5 -6 already in development.

[@daleadkison3349]

Is it gaint or giant. Fire the robo commentator. I really don't understand why some of these channels don't have the integrity to use a real person to narrate.😑

[@mrbill2600]

AI costs less ... so it'll probably keep its job.

[@junn679]

ULA : United Laundering Alliance

[@garyclouse7234]

Does this look like technology transfer or reverse engineering?? What do you think?

[@richardpark3054]

No.

[@edsmith6464]

Gaint engine? Work on that computer to voice work

[@fionajack9160]

Bot narration is the worst on this site. Sentence construction, weird word combinations pronunciation, consistently bad. They don’t seem to care.

[@RepRapper]

So if the best part is no part. Then why do you have 33 engines instead of 5 like the Saturn V F1?

[@odysseusrex5908]

You'd be amazed how many parts those F1s had, and they could only fly once. Also, by using a smaller engine, SpaceX can use the same engines on both stages, whereas the Saturn V needed different engines, the J2, on its upper stages. This gives the Starship (and Falcon) much greater operational flexibility than the purpose built Saturn V. The Saturn V was the greatest rocket ever built, it put us on the Moon, but now it is time to do more.

[@RepRapper]

@@odysseusrex5908 Your right the Saturn V is the greatest rocket ever built and it did take us to the moon and until Space X does more it will still be the greatest rocket ever made. the question is will they ever make it? 33 rocket engines have 6 times the chance of failure that 5 rocket engines do. I would like to see Space X really simplify their rockets and cut down all of those failure points. Why not 5 Mega Raptors and really simplify things? The Russian moon rocket failed and killed most of the scientist who worked on it using the same concept. Keep it simple.

[@DiamondPaintWithDiamondDave]

@@odysseusrex5908 add to that...the raptors are more easily mass produced than any other rocket motor before (not withstanding the smaller amateur rocketry stuff)

[@DiamondPaintWithDiamondDave]

@@RepRapper a "mega-raptor" would be too large to mass produce in the numbers SpaceX would need to accomplish the end mission goals of Starship, plus you'd still need the smaller raptors for the second stage anyway...mass production and reliability are key, as the mission goals for starship and super heavy extend much farther than just the moon or Low Earth Orbit, and will require Starships being produced in the thousands

[@RepRapper]

@@DiamondPaintWithDiamondDave Starship will never be produced in the thousands. Mars and Earth only line up the right way every two years.

[@katgray4830]

Click bait with ai voice and tons of commercials. You are blocked.

[@davidbudd2624]

Please stop with terms like humiliate. It is inappropriate, unhelpful and very unprofessional.

[@jallen1227]

your AI voice is crap - gaint, believe you mean giant. Elon is now the designer

[@Ronolein]

Ihr kennt die russischen Wissenschaftler nicht. Die sind nicht schockiert sondern eher interessiert. Ihr müsst nicht immer von Euch auf Andere schließen.

[@mrbill2600]

Well said ... and definitely true. But like NASA they are hampered by the government.

[@Nilmoy]

A strange AI voice again "all the time -.....- consuming"...

[@fionajack9160]

You used the exact same opening footage, when you covered R3 three days ago. Better than Alpha Tech, who repeated coverage of this same subject three times in the same week. Space, and SpaceX fans, are just looking for fresh and accurate coverage, properly edited, and not excessively repetitive

[@Nunya-py2vj]

F'in AI videos! smh

[@moefuzz5909]

CLICK BAIT

[@robertbrander2074]

Magician Musk ... with all his Raptor Versions ... and Revolutionary Whatever ... is Still Stuck in LEO ! ...(That's if he ever launches and Lands successfully) ... Which means , His BF Rocket , is Stuck in the Lowest levels of Space ..... Then He has to Refill his Fuel Tanks ! .... In order to go farther ..... That's the F Problem , the BF Rocket is too FB ! Pure Genius or Mad Folly ? .... At least it can Orbit Satellites and make Space Stations in LEO .....:-]

[@lcstarchaser]

Someone's cheerios were soggy this morning 😅

[@richardpark3054]

I think you should see your mental health professional for a medicine review.

[@lukeb3930]

I am blocking this channel

[@kenbarraclough3428]

Waste of my time

[@mrbill2600]

It's not time but you who is the waste.

[@doctorbolik]

"Russian scientist" is an oxymoron.

[@stefthorman8548]

not really, one of the best things about the soviets, was that they have very talented engineers and scientists

[@robertbrander2074]

LOL ! .... That Picture of the New Raptor 3 is a CGI FAKE ! .... It's too perfect ... No scratches or imperfections ... and every part is perfectly lit ! ... Mumbling Musk and Shotwell ... Con Artists extraordinare ..... :-/

[@richardpark3054]

Sometimes the truth can be brutal! But you'll get over your humiliation eventually.

[@alexanderfederowicz]

Elon, if you want to maximize your chemical rocket engines look at the ayurvedic mockups that still exist in Southern India they are ancient examples of standard chemical rocket technology in its maximized form if you reverse engineer your knowledge-based on those shapes it is likely you can maximize the effectiveness and reach an apex potential for chemical rocketry. This still does not represent proper use of kinetic force nor does it represent the recognition that gravitic dipoles are a simple process of right hand rule based electromagnetic gravitic technology... Ignorance is as ignorance does those who don't do will be remembered as those who can't do

[@StrifeA217]

If you know better then why haven't you done it? Where are your papers? Where are your small scale models? I'm not saying there isn't truth in what your saying, but if it is true why aren't you doing something to prove it?

[@КириллКонышев-м2ы]

@@StrifeA217 не мешайте человеку чувствовать себя , круче аэрокосмической компании , они взломали частицу бога.

[@paulogden7417]

Haha!

[@adammartin4906]

I researched everything you spoke about and what you put up is theoretical plus all Indian rockets are much weaker and less reliable so why would musk take such a major step back when his approach produces much cheaper and more powerful rocket designs that will allow the average joe in time to work in space. I'm sorry but your NASA or Tory Bruno approach which would keep only the elite in space and cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars were musk's approach would benefit all mankind by bringing all of us into space not a select few.

[@ashlionell]

Lol!