It's always "America this, America that" and sometimes Brittain gets a shoutout, and it's nice to see some other equipment for once. especially as a german, I'm really impressed by what a formidable force France can field on such a tight budget. mad respect
@CookieMonster-nt8hh2 жыл бұрын
@@swann67000 i mean, you guys have a functioning expeditionary force, an indigenous nuclear weapons program, anuclear subs and a nuclear carrier, and a strong fighter industry. and all that with a budget smaller than Germany's. We had to pull out of Afghanistan because we can't keep our own forces supplied. I think you guys are doing rather good with what you've got
@pdoylemi2 жыл бұрын
I agree. As I commented just a bit before, this is why allies matter. As a US Navy veteran I recognize technologies here pioneered by us and the Brits, but some I think are unique to this vessel that all of us can benefit from. The USA's best motorized artillery weapon is licensed from Norway. I can't think of an example off hand, but I'll bet our military has benefited a lot from Germany too.
@pdoylemi2 жыл бұрын
@@swann67000 No, I wish I had, but only the Canadians, Norwegians, Brits, and Australians.
@francinesicard4642 жыл бұрын
Not forgetting that on military level, France is the only European country largely independent of its allies in terms of military equipment and its equipment is quite remarkable. As we say at home, Nécessité fait loi. A tight military budget which led to a pragmatic policy of building multirole equipment, see the Rafale. We learned the lessons of WWII. Si vis pacem para bellum.
@yazhogvableau5607 Жыл бұрын
@@swann67000 First of all I specify that I am French too. You compare incomparable things, the USA is a little less than 15 times larger than France with a population 5 to 6 times larger, a MUCH larger economy than France. It is sure compared to the USA, France has a rather mediocre army. Only compared to many countries the majority of our military industry is "autonomous" and our technology is "equal" to that of the USA. I take the Rafale as an example, it is equivalent to the American F-22, moreover the Americans no longer show the F-22 internationally when it is against the burst because the only training having been done between the 2, the Rafale won. The American pilots clearly said that they were impressed by the quality of the Rafale. We are currently the only country with the United States to have a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, for example. Our Caesar guns are some of the most accurate artillery guns in the world. The MAMBA with the Italians and one of the best anti-aircraft systems (From what I've heard it's even better than the American PATRIOT, but I'm not sure about that). As for ammunition, several Nexter factories have just reopened to provide us with a larger stock. We must not underestimate our capacities either, yes we have an army with very few soldiers, but in France patriotism has almost disappeared unlike the United States. There people proudly display themselves with their flags while in France they treat you as a fascist if you do. We must not forget that military capabilities are linked to politics and the economy... The less people will love their countries, the less they will join the army. But unlike some of our neighbors who are reducing their army (United Kingdom among others) France is expanding it.
@F-104L Жыл бұрын
C'était génial pour moi de découvrir ce magnifique navire Français qui résume bien l'expression : "En France, on n'a pas de pétrole, mais on à des idées !!!" C'est vraiment un navire efficace et bien conçu.
@Isshiki0tsutsuki-yc4qm2 ай бұрын
Certainly agree with all the commendable and powerful power of these BPCs. Britain certainly need one for it's marines who don't have their own command ship.
@F-104L2 ай бұрын
@@Isshiki0tsutsuki-yc4qm HMS X1
@Errr7172 жыл бұрын
Awesome ship. Nice to see the French build a multi-capability ship. Nice complement to allied capabilities.
@andremetayer1467 Жыл бұрын
Please, stop kidding ! Russia was client of France, but after their Crimea agress, France decided to not deliver this kind of ship. Russia attempt to repair his only aircraft carrier, and can't take it out off the state of wrek...
@Flobann Жыл бұрын
@charlesepstein898the bpc are 100% french and probably have more technologies than any others helicopter carrier
@tommiterava5955 Жыл бұрын
@Charles Epstein No. France was building 3 for itself and 2 for Russia which were then sold to Egypt.
@Floridaboi-pe3fk Жыл бұрын
Would be good if they hosted their white flag on the ship to stay true with their reputation
@sebastienpetrein5541 Жыл бұрын
@@Floridaboi-pe3fk White flag come from English surrendering to the Kingdom of France. Our reputation is to be feared by the rest of Europe for centuries.
@coolcoolercoolest212 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate how France always does its own thin.
@Aco747lyte3 жыл бұрын
Un navire très impressionnant ! Ça me rend fier d'être français !
@romcr3630 Жыл бұрын
France has the second largest maritime territory in the world (10 millions square kilometers) right after the US (11 millions square kilometers) and before Australia (9 millions square kilomters), this is why the French Navy is made a priority by France to stay the largest and strongest from european countries to be able to protect that territory, with parts of it all over the world, in every ocean. Huge task for such a small country compared to giants such as the US, China, Russia, India, and this is why french engineering is of the finest. Quality has to prevail over quantity, no choice.
@dev-mc4jq Жыл бұрын
As a frenchman i'll tell you something. Metropolitan French politics folks don't really care about french peoples living on french islands thousands kilometers of France, they only care about theses island for the ressources their maritime territories hold and touristic incomes, worst thing is that they even often makes funs of peoples coming from theses islands and maintain them in poverty and sometime under a terrible condition (one recent example is mayotte, gov trying to ignore peoples don't have access to fresh water !). They still behave like there is a smell of colonial era. So yeah, french navies exists to protect theses territories (not much their peoples) and are used as refuelling spots for allies or french power projection. An old example of what theses islands can be is Haiti, it was also a french island before, and they were given their liberty in exchange of a huge debt they are still paying back nowandays to France, maintaining them in extreme poverty. I see that as a warning for other islands.
@brodocassel Жыл бұрын
@@dev-mc4jq this documentary literally shows how France used its capabilities to help st-Martin rebuild after a hurricane. Such is one of many advantages to being part of France. Mayotte’s biggest problem is illegal immigration from neighbouring Comorians who flee to Mayotte for a better life. All overseas territories today are free to leave through democratic process. St-Domingue/Haiti was a different era and the island was taken from France by force.
@ledocteurgonzo Жыл бұрын
plus de 10,9 millions de km²
@orokana_isuramu2 жыл бұрын
Viva la France... Thank you for sharing such an innovation with the world.
@Terab752 жыл бұрын
oui mais il faut faire attention, on en a construit 2 pour la Russie, ils étaient achevés, heureusement qu'on a rompu le contrat après les 1ere attaques contre l'Ukraine. Je crois qu'ils ont été vendu à l'Egypte depuis. Mais du moment qu'on en a gardé pour nous, c'est ok ^^
@orokana_isuramu2 жыл бұрын
@@Terab75 So unfortunate, that invader deserves none of this ship.
@derrick4544 Жыл бұрын
Really? Sharing innovation? The US has 20 of these things prowling the oceans...for decades...just stop.
@zeubizeren82292 жыл бұрын
i must say, i went to france for becoming an engineer, after seeing this, i think i will stay and apply for Naval Group ( The corporation that made this master piece)
@patlelion3 жыл бұрын
One of the best army, Air Force and navy in the planet
@kolerick2 жыл бұрын
France doesn't have the biggest military budget, so they have to resort more to efficiency and ingenuity to get close of the capabilities of those who can spend way more... when designing new materials/equipment, this has a vera big influence on the engineer mindset... where some will throw money at the problem, French engineer will look for alternate solutions
@francinesicard464 Жыл бұрын
Pragmatism tells us that with less we can do more and remain independent. The French often use their famous system D (le système D comme Débrouille). Out of the box thinking.
@willmears11113 жыл бұрын
Fantastic ingenuity. Congratulations France.
@zeubizeren82292 жыл бұрын
Naval group is the company that is bulding these beast, looking for a job ? check out naval group recrutement
@Anolaana3 жыл бұрын
22:12 I've never seen a guy so enthusiastic about parallel parking!
@arlekin200093 жыл бұрын
i'am agree with you!!,he look happy like a child in a candy shop!!lool
@athrunzala67703 жыл бұрын
it's more a question of stress and translation which gives this impression
@tictac2therevenge2913 жыл бұрын
It's also a fucking nightmare to park in Paris lol
@JoJo-vm8vk3 жыл бұрын
That isn’t really an easy manoeuvre to do with a 200m long/ 20 000t ship !
@heinzguderian6283 жыл бұрын
Everybody has a passion
@alexfournier9956 Жыл бұрын
SO HUGE THIS MILITARY BOAT !! CONGRATS FRENCH FRIENDS !!!
@christopha.mueller12873 жыл бұрын
I'm soo proud to be French and always was - French technology and innovation, not to forget their ingenious engineering, is top notch.
@sarahwilliams7553 жыл бұрын
What like Maginot Line where the germans want around it. And did you hereabout the man how flow back to France in June. Frenchman: “Do you have your passport?” Man: “Nope” Frenchman: “You can not enter France with out your passport”. Man: “But last time I did not need to show anyone my passport” Franchman: “YOU CAN NOT, HAVE NOT, AND WILL NEVER BE ALLOWED IN TO FRANCE WITH OUT YOUR PASSPORT” Man: “WELL LAST TIME I COME TO FRANCE WAS JUNE 1944 AND I COULD FIND A F**KING FRENCHMAN TO SHOW IT TO” But hey good lucky with your technology and innovation even thou the British had something like this for years and years and years like you know on D-DAY.
@christopha.mueller12873 жыл бұрын
@@sarahwilliams755 True - big mistake of ours to be quite naive of thinking the German would respect Neutral countries such as Belgium and the Netherlands. And we were very arrogant/ignorant too. But seeing what the Germans do nowadays - their army (every branch) is absolutely harmless for not to say laughable and even small countries like Switzerland feel very comfy.
@sarahwilliams7553 жыл бұрын
@@christopha.mueller1287 Oh because the germans are know the play by the rules even from the First World War. Not only know a the first Great War but the end of civilised war, with the Germans sinking the lusitania bombing cities via air ships and the introduction of gas.
@christopha.mueller12873 жыл бұрын
@@sarahwilliams755 I suppose we both saw the same video here, right? So, I didn't pretend the French invented all new on naval landing operations, but as you could see they truly introduced some new technology for this type of vessel and therefore enhanced the operation capabilities. So, I don't really know, what you're insinuating.
@peterlloyd83133 жыл бұрын
I would not tell anyone if I was French.Luckily ,I was born the other side of the channel.
@andrewgrant89003 жыл бұрын
Fantastic piece of engineering and technology.
@thegrinch81613 жыл бұрын
I do like this vessel for its multi role capabilities and it’s surprising that more naval forces in the world don’t have exactly the same in their inventory
@Venezolano4103 жыл бұрын
Most countries aren't interested in projecting power beyond their respective borders. Their navies are defensive in nature so local coastal patrol is adequate.
@raphaelortegacoste65093 жыл бұрын
Egypt bought France 2 units
@raphaelortegacoste65093 жыл бұрын
Russia was supposed to buy a couple also but France declined
@RJM10113 жыл бұрын
@@raphaelortegacoste6509 Because Russia fucked up Egypt got the two ships !
@nicolas24193 жыл бұрын
You have several navies that have such kind of ships, at least : USA, France, South Korea, Spain, Italy, Egypt, Australia, Japan,...
@JohnS9164 жыл бұрын
Outstanding vessel and congratulations to the French for building such a versatile craft. I'll wager they could even accept jump jets if need be.
@unitedwestand51004 жыл бұрын
For a peacetime mission! Otherwise all I see is a future artificial reef.
@JohnS9164 жыл бұрын
@@unitedwestand5100 did you watch the video?
@unitedwestand51004 жыл бұрын
@@JohnS916 ,. That French Ship would be great for service in national disasters like hurricanes. It might suit the French needs for deployment to their African colonies to battle unsophisticated insurgent forces. But it wouldnt be worth its salt to deploy an invasion force into hostile areas.
@RR-us2kp4 жыл бұрын
@@unitedwestand5100 France is definitely better than US at fighting that sort of fights. France didn't lose to Vietnamese rice farmers.
@unitedwestand51004 жыл бұрын
@@RR-us2kp ,. Lololololololol. STFU until you get an education, fool. French Indochina, 1954 In the late 1940s, the French struggled to control its colonies in Indochina - Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos. Despite financial assistance from the United States, nationalist uprisings against French colonial rule began to take their toll. On May 7, 1954, the French-held garrison at Dien Bien Phu in Vietnam fell after a four month siege led by Vietnamese nationalist Ho Chi Minh. After the fall of Dien Bien Phu, the French pulled out of the region.
@lecoqjeannot33583 жыл бұрын
I served 2 years on the predecessor of this ship in the 70's. TCD ORAGE (Storm) L9022 Same principles but of course less high tech in those days !
@Nerun20002 жыл бұрын
Never saw a documentary of a heli carrier before and this ship is a lot more than "just" a heli carrier. Great documentary, which covers so many interesting parts in detail, the ship sounds amazing with a lot of capabilities that it can cover. Surely not a ship for every country/navy, but very interesting. The Netherlands share the Karel Doorman with Germany and the ship seems to cover some of the features of the Thunder Boat, we (Germany) don't have anything close to it, but we do have a very different approach to missions abroad than the French mind you. Anyway, so much thought went into the design of this ship and experience, seems like a fantastic versatile ship. French navy can be proud of it. Thanks for the very interesting look behind the scenes, I always wondered about these ships and this documentary gives soo much more insight than your regular wiki entries of course.
@jamesconner34372 жыл бұрын
@LOLO / VAL Just the conversation of you two is interesting as well. A lot of investment in one place, but for the uses spoken of, not combat with another navy, you do indeed have a very impressive design. ( spoken as an ex-USN Navigator). I only worry that. as evidenced in the Black Sea, shore-to-ship portable munitions are getting very dangerous.
@rickross54212 жыл бұрын
France has the widest sea territories in the world, above that, France mainland is surrounded by 3 seas, so it is meaningful to be able to use this field. Germany used to prefer invading by land so I understand you don't put much importance in Navy technologies :)
@Anthraxicus3 жыл бұрын
France, I'm glad that you're our ally and have been our ally for a very long time, Vive La France from the USA!
@tricosteryl3 жыл бұрын
Hello from France !
@Destru3 жыл бұрын
Independence WW2 WW1 and way more
@charlestorruella85913 жыл бұрын
There wouldn't be a u.s.a. without the help of the French during the revolutionary war
@malikben9303 жыл бұрын
To be fair in France more and more people doens''t see usa are allies... Sabotaging the australien deal is one blow but therr is so more. A lot of french societies are aggressly bought and dismanteled by usa, like our jewel, Alstom. Usa also inflict lot of unfair penalties to french societies
@CharliMorganMusic3 жыл бұрын
@@malikben930 France doesn't look like it will fight China if it came down to it.
@gilvangreig-clarke21062 жыл бұрын
OK just me or are the French Navy uniforms really cool
@samypons31852 жыл бұрын
yes they are
@reneprovosty70322 жыл бұрын
its you.
@pw60022 жыл бұрын
The uniforms from the French navy are not for show-off, but designed with operational efficiency in mind. So yeah, they are cool.
@humblepie10172 жыл бұрын
It’s just you 😂
@lexRiggsz2 жыл бұрын
@@humblepie1017 they look more like firemen lol
@frogstamper3 жыл бұрын
Congratulations France on these superb ships, a true testament to French engineering and skill.
@dai0laffin3 жыл бұрын
"french engineering skill"? ha ha ha!! that made me laugh :}
@Klliansimabras3 жыл бұрын
@@dai0laffin Why ?
@brandonr68043 жыл бұрын
@@dai0laffin France builds excellent warships. The first stealth frigates were designed by France and then other countries copied.
@brandonr68043 жыл бұрын
@HMS King George V The French built their nuclear attack submarines on their own, unlike the British, who did not need American help to complete the program.
@meurzei40053 жыл бұрын
@@brandonr6804 bien dit, heureusement qu'il existe des Americans sensés.
@Terab752 жыл бұрын
I'm French, I knew these ships, but I learned a lot thanks to this video. thank you
@egran21503 жыл бұрын
france is a very great independant country in th e military they can make anythng on their own and so well made , very impressive the qality of this equipment !! congrats france really !!
@athrunzala67703 жыл бұрын
we are not independant anymore :( there is this fucking EU comission !
@edouardkaspers29403 жыл бұрын
@@athrunzala6770 politiquement si vs voulez mais militairement la France est totalement indépendant..l'industrie militaire française peut fabriquer tout types d'armemant tant qu'ielle aura les moyens financiers biensur
@edouardkaspers29403 жыл бұрын
@@swann67000 ahh non les french vs etes pessimiste je trouve..vous connaissez mal votre armée La France est la deuxième puissance occidentale juste après les US et loin devant les UK....vs parlez de guerre mais il faut savoir une chose..même si un jour là France entrait en guerre contre les états Unis où la Russie et Bein...sachez qu'il aurait pas de vainqueur..la France les détruirait une fois et eux vous détruiront 100fois..voilà la différence...de nos jours aucuns puissance n'oserait s'attaquer à la France car elle a une dissuasion nucléaire indépendante ce que les anglais n'ont pas...dans une éventuelle guerre nucléaires les portes avions ne serviront à rien seul les sous marins seront utiles et les russes l'ont bien compris
@edouardkaspers29403 жыл бұрын
@@swann67000 certe l'armée française pourrai augmenter son budjet mais elle sera obligé de sacrifier d'autres secteur reste à savoir si elle en aura le courage car économiquement la France est un peu limité par rapport au géant américain ou chinois..bref ce qui est sùr la France reste une grande puissance militaire car elle fabrique tout elle même ..vs me parler de la Turquie mais pourquoi elle a reculer concernant l'exploitation du gaz au large de la gréce..la Turquie a la chance d'être membre de l'OTAN et du coup la France est un peu obligé de negocier...enfaite la France doit sortir de l'OTAN tout simplement..vs me parlez de respect mais sachez que l'armée française a le respect des 4 grandes puissance..US..RUSSIE CHINE..INDE. en off ils se connaissent tous..vs croyez que le fait que les Emirats aient acheté 80 rafales est du hasard alors que les Américains avaient proposé les f35 ...enfaite c'était pour calmer la France par rapport aux fiasco des sous marins car l'Amérique ne peut pas se permettre de perdre un allié considéré comme le deuxième pays le plus grand au monde de par sa zone économique exclusive Bon moi je suis un sénégalais passionné en géopolitique et bien informè...lol
@almmax91943 жыл бұрын
@@edouardkaspers2940 en effet de par ses territoires dans le pacifique sud a travers la france l'UE est aussi présente dans cette region si elle sort de l'UE comme les anglais celà affaiblirait beaucoup l'union géopolitiquement et strategiquement UE
@Galvaxatron3 жыл бұрын
This kind of vessel seems perfect for major modern day navy operations.
@mikewalrus47634 жыл бұрын
Nice piece of kit - OK nothing much new (apart from the Catamaran landing vessel) but the combination of everything together is beautiful - oh how I wish we had all that back in the 60's when I was involved in such vessels!
@ludovicbon59032 жыл бұрын
Using azimutal pods was pretty disruptive for a military ship . I've seen most of the class Mistral ships during their sea trials, they are incredibly manœuvrable .
@vincentkermorgant3 жыл бұрын
You need to give credit to the french : when they design weapons, they know what they are doing !
@hiiamcoray70883 жыл бұрын
Definitely
@sorryociffer3 жыл бұрын
Did you know Italy will soon have a THIRD aircraft carrier?…..
@zzirSnipzz13 жыл бұрын
@Brandon FR Would need to be the QE make the charles de gualle look like a rowing boat
@zzirSnipzz13 жыл бұрын
@Brandon FR Then why are you saying it will be a success if it wont happen? Whats wrong with the QE's? they look perfect for expansion and modification in the future
@zzirSnipzz13 жыл бұрын
@Brandon FR They are gonna fit a catapult on the PoW, Conventional propulsion is much safer and alowd in more ports where you have to go to restock food anyway, Nuclear carriers are just asking for bother if they ever did get took out or leak and the F35, We have some of the best escort ships in the world and building more that is how carriers are supposed to work
@ronaldsims26023 жыл бұрын
Really brilliant and what a well trained crew the French lead the way with these vessels.
@ricardokowalski1579 Жыл бұрын
Good. The world stage needs more french presence. These kind of versatile ships can project "soft power" in peace, and deliver "hard power" if it comes to that.
@RJM10113 жыл бұрын
The UK could do with some of these types of ships as we lost the only one we had and the one in the RFA is well over 40 years old now ! Thank you for the video and thumbs up.
@uncitoyen_86143 жыл бұрын
You had the HMS Ocean.
@RJM10113 жыл бұрын
@@uncitoyen_8614 Yes and the wankers got rid of it ! :(
@michaelnolan67963 жыл бұрын
@@RJM1011 It was very old and hard to fix so I get why they sold it but I also think we should get a few.
@RJM10113 жыл бұрын
@@michaelnolan6796 Yes I understand but one in the RFA is nearly 50 years old !
@adriansams60663 жыл бұрын
Maybe the French could lend us theirs considering we have been helping them out in Africa with Chinooks etc.......Afterall we are neighbours and besty mates.. :-)
@Mestari1Gaming2 жыл бұрын
Magnificent French Engineering! ☺
@itslife29663 жыл бұрын
A European country which has 1 building of this type is already good ... 3 ... it is even better !!! Nice 👍🙏
@sasquatch27533 жыл бұрын
How fast does it go in reverse ?
@deckdeckard52973 жыл бұрын
@@sasquatch2753 Why?
@brittanyfirst16083 жыл бұрын
@@sasquatch2753 what’s up wanker?
@sasquatch27533 жыл бұрын
Lol.. all three of you have NO clue to what my statement is actually saying ;-)
@gnomos673 жыл бұрын
@@sasquatch2753 we know, you are just trying to push the rampant American taunt on the French escape. We are used to it, especially because it came from countries that we have fought and destroyed through time
@jem51592 жыл бұрын
Wonderful and amazing vessel. Good example of French sophistication.
@ouafallouz2 жыл бұрын
Une merveille d'ingéniosité et de prouesses technologiques. Fier d'être français!
@kenhelmers26033 жыл бұрын
Impressive ship indeed. Thanks for the tour! :)
@lydiaanderson77523 жыл бұрын
@Hello Ken how are you doing?
@samypons31852 жыл бұрын
@@lydiaanderson7752 hi
@مقارنات_الجيوش Жыл бұрын
2 in egypt
@Forensource3 жыл бұрын
What doesn't this do? I am impressed.
@Seb-H3 жыл бұрын
Tire-bouchon ? 😁
@ericlemaire8524 Жыл бұрын
In France we don't have much money but we have great engineers.
@YoniBaruch-y3m Жыл бұрын
“Don’t have much money”… but still a G7 economy and an expensive place to live! 😊
@larrykinglk Жыл бұрын
Expensive place to live? When one travels around, it appears to be quite reasonable.
@alkazarjkdghjd Жыл бұрын
If you go in the big city it's expensive, like everywhere else in the world. But many place in France are cheap and people dont have much money. @@YoniBaruch-y3m
@CoralWatches Жыл бұрын
@@YoniBaruch-y3m they're talking about military budget...
@francinesicard464 Жыл бұрын
@@YoniBaruch-y3m Go to Singapore or Switzerland for expensive places to Iive in, not forgetting the UK which has gone from bad to worse with Brexit.🤣
@Lost-In-Blank10 ай бұрын
My congratulations to the producers, directors and crew who created this documentary. It is very very well done ! This was really worth the hour I spent watching it.
@pdoylemi2 жыл бұрын
This video shows the value of having allies. This impressive vessel contains many innovations pioneered by the USA and Britain, and adds brilliant things of its own that one can bet we will adopt. No country does everything best. Working and learning together makes us all stronger.
@francinesicard4642 жыл бұрын
No, no country does everything best. But on the military level, France is the only European country quite independent of its allies in terms of military equipment and its equipment is quite remarkable.
@hurri77202 жыл бұрын
As the Brit I assume you are I assume you think Britain was ahead of France in every possible way. But the reality is that France was from the beginning ahead of Britain in aviation especially, and not behind in anything. But I agree we always learn from each other, all of us, But some assumptions still smell and not so good either, and they tend to remain and remain.
@arapahoetactical77493 жыл бұрын
The Swiss Army Knife of the French Navy. WOW, what a ship!
@zcomme2 жыл бұрын
L9015 Victorinox!
@terrystephens11024 жыл бұрын
What an exceptional piece of equipment - so versatile. Brilliant design 👌👌👏👏👏👏❤️
@devin51394 жыл бұрын
Its hardly unique. Doesn't even stack up to the dozen or so wasp and Tarawa class ships of the USN.
@Bapih4 жыл бұрын
@@devin5139 American Nationalist spotted ! You have way more ships than anyone, good for you. We have free healthcare on our ships, do you ? :d
@RR-us2kp4 жыл бұрын
@@devin5139 those rusty pieces of junk? Eww
@tm.83993 жыл бұрын
@@devin5139 we also had the ouragan class, but it's not floating anymore, good for you you kept your old navy
@mooglemy38133 жыл бұрын
@@devin5139 did you enjoy the vid? I'm a USN vet and this French multi Role ship is great. Don't need to kick em with the equivalent USN amphibs. We all know USN is an awesome navy. However France is a can do country as well. They are the only navy besides the USN that operates a Nuke Carrier. So did you enjoy the vid or not. I sure as hell did. Way to go France and your navy.
@shechaiyah68693 жыл бұрын
I'm duly impressed. Thanks for this information.
@Neuroguy13 жыл бұрын
Amazing, from design to functionality. Every little thing has been thought out.
@markbrisec39723 жыл бұрын
I would love to see more documentaries about current and future French weapon systems. From the Charles DeGaulle aircraft carrier to modernization of the Lecrerc tank to Dassault Rafale to an awesome Cesar self propelled howitzer to French Navy's frigates. And last, but not the least, an awesome nuclear submarines, especially this new class that you're building for the Australian Navy where the basic nuclear submarine design was used as a template for the advanced AIP diesel electric submarines. They will be an awesome power projection platforms for the Australian Navy in the ever more increasingly dangerous and contested South China sea.
@Itachi9510003 жыл бұрын
Oh well... they ditched the diesel subs' deal as you know.
@vegass043 жыл бұрын
@@Itachi951000 Well, obviously. Stuff happen, things change.. Who would think 10 months ago that we could have a major war breaking out ij Europe?
@Paterrrr3 жыл бұрын
@@vegass04 very true, the offer we did to the Australians was made in a much less violent environment than when they decided to join aukus
@Ndriana2 жыл бұрын
Too bad you’ll get Uncle Sam’s toys now. Makes sens from a logistical and political point of view but such a shame on a functional and field level.
@barakaobombervsronaldraide30982 жыл бұрын
This did not age well
@the5gen2 жыл бұрын
Thank you to our allies across the Atlantic. 🇺🇸 / 🇫🇷
@MBB5633 жыл бұрын
wow that's a beast...this Naval ship alone has more sea land and air power than most navies in the world!
@patlelion2 жыл бұрын
And the French have 4 of them 😮
@philippehuchon236 Жыл бұрын
@@patleliononly 3: Mistral, Tonnerre and Dixmude. Two other BPC were build for Russia but the contract has been broken following the invasion of Crimea. As far as I know, they have been sold to Egypt.
@southerncross863 жыл бұрын
Le Citroën du mer, tres innovatif bateu, une vrai merveille.
@zied64563 жыл бұрын
Plutôt un Berliet!
@silentvoiceinthedark56653 жыл бұрын
viva la citroen du france
@gandigooglegandigoogle720211 ай бұрын
this ship is incredible ! a feat in technological terms....truly impressive ! i love it
@melvinleppla67823 жыл бұрын
Magnificent naval vessel.
@Terab752 жыл бұрын
Navire de guerre et navire de paix. Ils ont aidé à sauver des centaines de gens victimes de cyclones, comme à St Martin.
@austx2902 жыл бұрын
Wow! I've never seen anything like this. Go France!
@dynamo17962 жыл бұрын
Except you have - the US, Japan and Australia all operate ships like these and they're bigger as well.
@lebigeon Жыл бұрын
@@dynamo1796guess they all have to compensate for something
@dynamo1796 Жыл бұрын
@@lebigeon Yeah - the face France is rocking a 35+ year old primary fighter and an aircraft carrier half the size of the QE class. We gotta compensate for French military shortcomings essentially.
@kumarandisamy74683 жыл бұрын
France is very ambitious yet very cautious at the same time
@crawford3234 жыл бұрын
Pretty darn neat. Some real out of the box thinking.
@procommunistdestruction23184 жыл бұрын
How is it out of the box thinking? USA has built 30 of these over the last 30 years? Lmao
@IMGreg..3 жыл бұрын
@@procommunistdestruction2318 With the shaft less propulsion pods with 360 deg rotation? Anchorless mooring? Which ship is that? I'd like to watch that video as well.
@tm.83993 жыл бұрын
@@procommunistdestruction2318 which boat?
@TwoWheelWarrior3 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for the AQUAHOLIC review!
@Downloadguy19953 жыл бұрын
Who or what is that?
@lalchimiste77963 жыл бұрын
"This is a proper offshore go everywhere ship with a Miele dishwasher"
@jasonsmith11434 жыл бұрын
good luck to her crew's 👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 from Las Vegas
@mmarsh19722 жыл бұрын
OK let me correct a major mistake here. Its not "the thunder boat". The ship is called TONNERRE which means "Thunder" in French. TONNERRE is part of the MISTRAL class. MISTRAL is the lead ship, TONNERRE is her sister ship as is DIXMUDE. There are two other MISTRAL class ships that were originally to be sold to Russia but after Russia invasion of Crimea the sale was cancelled (as punishment) and sold to EGYPT instead. These ships are called ABDEL NASSER and ANWAR SADAT. There is also a smaller version available for export called the "MISTRAL 140" for countries with smaller budgets, although there are as of yet no orders.
@giorgiodifrancesco45902 жыл бұрын
Tonnerre...two -r-.
@mmarsh19722 жыл бұрын
@@giorgiodifrancesco4590 Doh, should have known that. Corrected, thanks!
@oerwout104 жыл бұрын
Great documentary. you really know how to keep people's attention and teach them something at the same time. well done
@domipa39723 жыл бұрын
Bravo au bateau, à ses marins qui le mettent en œuvre, aux ingénieurs qui l'ont conçu, à ceux qui l'ont construit et à ceux qui l'utilisent. Mais aussi félicitations au réalisateur de ce film qui permet en 50 minutes de presque tout savoir de ce magnifique "couteau suisse naval".
@olivierdk22 жыл бұрын
Ce n'est pas un bateau, c'est un navire. nuance importante. Un navire peut avoir( transporter ) des bateaux, mais un bateau ne peut avoir des navires
@sprre38993 жыл бұрын
Nice ship and well thought out 👍
@crawford3234 жыл бұрын
Even n it’s sailing ship designs,France has had a history of unique thinking resulting in unique designs
@Andrew-yb1uv3 жыл бұрын
Great ship, flexible and well designed.
@stevehhall33853 жыл бұрын
That is one impressive bit of kit. Kudos..
@fredvandesiepkamp98404 жыл бұрын
Vive la France !
@dlrowolleh58553 жыл бұрын
@Heavy Metal God So original and funny omg
@corvanphoenix2 жыл бұрын
Viva la France! I think they should investigate winch based landing systems for their landings in bad weather. It's easy to get a helicopter on deck when it's attached to a winch ;)
@saurabhpratapsinghs3 жыл бұрын
Now that's called a purposeful vessel. War, Humanitarian ground whatever you say!!
@mastrofnone80254 жыл бұрын
Smart ship. Good Job.
@pierreduforest9215 Жыл бұрын
Très beau bâtiment fier de notre marine et d être français
@mastrofnone80254 жыл бұрын
Strap a few tanks to the flight deck and you have a destroyer
@Lapantouflemagic03 жыл бұрын
I wonder if there is actually provisions for doing this 😄
@JoJo-vm8vk3 жыл бұрын
They did an experiment with a MLRS firing from the deck 😉
@Zfast4y0u3 жыл бұрын
@@Lapantouflemagic0 i doubt, tank tracks could dmg landing deck, heck they do dmg the streets when they turn..
@mastrofnone80253 жыл бұрын
@@Zfast4y0u The American carriers I visited had a wooden layer on their flight decks if I remember correctly. I dont know if the tracks would do much.
@hamdy0seeker3 жыл бұрын
egypt has 2 of these .. and we added humvees with missiles on deck
@thierrym8875 Жыл бұрын
As a French it is nice to see positive post about this multirole design and how France can still cope with few money to keep an acceptable military capability in diverse fields (Howitzer, Navy, Aircraft) . However the truth is we were urged to do our best with fewer budget each year which explains such "swiss knife" design is not reallly a choice but mandatory... Keeping a fully autonomous military capabilities (including own Nuclear weapons not to depend on US decision in case our Nation existence could be jeopardized ) while other European countries were still 100% counting on the US nuke umbrella led to a decline of our economical performances while others could invest in other fields all the money they did not have to invest in the army. This has created an economical competitive advantage within EU and unfair competition which partially explain German economically overperformance for decades (partially...) and finally led to anti European feelings among some workers in declining economical sectors... As a consequence it has been like a viscious circle ... fewer money ... have to struggle to keep military performance anyway ... fewer money available then... struggling more to keep a decent army ... etc... etc... . and a viscious circle decreasing trust in real European partnerships in the same time... It is a pity European nations did not decide to have same position as for civil aircraft with Airbus balancing Boeing and sometimes beating it in some aspects ... European partnerships in the military are never successful and countries always choose US equipment instead... We had some decades to be ready and able to protect ourselves against a threat for our civilization and values as we are facing right now from diverse parts of the world ... With proper European leaders which could have been a decent European capable force beside US ("beside" and not as vassal) but we have wasted this opportunity. This would have been in the US advantage too to let its main partner becoming stronger and reach a more balanced role in the Western partnership. However, as often, the US prefer friendly countries acting like vassals rather like real partners because they think keeping a dependance link is more trustable for them...I think it's a strategic mistake. They made sure by several means (example available on demand) its partner does not become too strong and too independant capable while claiming in the same time he should invest more in its own defense capabilities... Now I wonder how countries like Baltics would react if someday more and more US leaders get closer to Trump line and agree to shift from "America first" line to "America only"... (It would be by the way also a bad move from the US since current events show how much the US, alone, is struggling to cope with anti Western democratic model forces from diverse parts of the world...)
@kulkarniprabhanjan3 жыл бұрын
I hope the Indian coast guard can have a smaller baby version of this for Diaster management
@jeanvaljean92933 жыл бұрын
Actually the indian navy is looking that buying 4 for those or bigger, this one is 16 500 tons empty, the bigger version is 25 000 tons empty. An other lighter version 13 500 tonnes is also offered by naval group.
@jeanvaljean92933 жыл бұрын
@Shades 1.5 it's not for me or you to decide but the gov and the program is on going
@death_parade3 жыл бұрын
Don't worry, Indian Navy is already ordering four such ships, they will have additional capabilities over and above what this French Mistral class has. Would be great if they modify the French Mistral class for those additional capabilities. France has good relations with Indian MDL, they can make the ships in India. Either them or CSL.
@anthonyrosa50063 жыл бұрын
The us navy uses RAST gear. A weight and cable drop[s down and is captured by a skid that locks the cable and the helo can winch itself down and then rides in a track. This helps capture the helicopter in rough seas and then pulls the helo into the hangar bay on smaller ships.
@JoJo-vm8vk3 жыл бұрын
For the record, this class of ship is already proven in most of its possible mission, even when it was just barely accepted into service: - evacuation from Lebanon - disaster relief after hurricane in Lesser Antilles islands - sending combat helicopters at night for raids on Libya
@dominationsrebellion64333 жыл бұрын
SF raids in Somalia too
@BruneSixtine Жыл бұрын
Operation Sangaris and Operation Serval in Africa too. Quick deployement of entire company teams on land.
@thegrinch81613 жыл бұрын
My next words is a sincere compliment, I’m surprised that the thunderboat pilot can walk at all with the size of cojones needed for his/ her job
@TerryCheever10 ай бұрын
Good to see our friends have their act together, impressive.
@محمدالدرجليالدرجلي3 жыл бұрын
لما نشوف كل هذه التعقيدات نعرف اد إيه مصر عظيمه بابناءها والفارق بيننا ليس ببعيد
@chuckbarlow55324 жыл бұрын
Very Impressive
@ronaldmorrison64484 жыл бұрын
I think we might be able to use these ships in the U.S. military. They are impressive.
@Ukie884 жыл бұрын
Glad it's part of NATO ...vive la France !
@JStryker73 жыл бұрын
The US already has the Wasp and America class LHAs
@athrunzala67703 жыл бұрын
US use already the french navy so u not really need our ship :p "The French Navy (Marine Nationale) Charles de Gaulle carrier strike group (CSG) today assumed command of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command's (NAVCENT) Task Force (CTF) 50. Task Force 50 is one of the components of the U.S. naval forces deployed in the Arab-Persian Gulf region. "
@florentbirot4745 Жыл бұрын
@@athrunzala6770 wouhaw......US use nothing .France use their forces in NATO ....We left NATO in the past ,we can do it again ... We want a Européen defense anyway. US use:) Connard !
@geroutathat2 жыл бұрын
I love the humanitarian aspects, being able to pull up to a country and help them. Every neutral country of the EU should buy one or build one.
@ludovicbon59032 жыл бұрын
Le Tonnerre was send to Beirut after the devastating explosion with food, an onboard extended hospital , medics, navy firemen and a specialized team with their dogs to search and rescue victims trapped under the rubble . The Tonnerre was also transporting trucks and heavy duty vehicles .
@TemplarX22 жыл бұрын
Also it's a great morale boost for French and NATO soldiers, knowing a high class hospital is an helicopter jump away in case you are wounded.
@फोंडातेवैभववाडी2 жыл бұрын
India 🇮🇳 should purchase it, Very useful for libration of Balochistan and Sindh
@timferguson1593 Жыл бұрын
I see SH-60H's. And the Osprey. I'm a Retired US Navy Aircrewman/Rescue Swimmer. I was always impressed that we share submarine ICBM s with the UK. But only with Great Britain.
@williamcooper24153 жыл бұрын
I've been in a lot of ships and I say that the RMC De`Couverte was built with navy personnel in mind, because the halls and other passages are much wider and their work and living spaces less crowded.
@zcomme2 жыл бұрын
RMC Découverte is the name of the TV Channel! ^^)))
@mexicomax772 жыл бұрын
Ship’s name Is Tonnerre
@blackmamba34273 жыл бұрын
Amazing warship!!
@SH15598013 жыл бұрын
a magnificent ship...
@LOLOVAL-os3pq Жыл бұрын
it is a helicopter carrier, with a workshop for the maintenance of these helicopters, it is also a ship for transporting military equipment, it can carry around 40 Leclerc tanks, it can transport infantrymen or evacuate civilians in the event of an emergency. disaster like a hurricane, it is a hospital comprising 2 surgical blocks, it is a command center and conventional or satellite radio transmissions, it can balester by filling tanks in order to adapt its level of buoyancy, it can carry 2 transport catamarans of 100 tons capacity each (L-CAT), it is equipped with pods and a bow thruster, which allows it to maintain its GPS position automatically! it can also stabilize itself using rudders! he even impressed the Americans who have much larger ships!
@donparr49493 жыл бұрын
Golly gee-- I like that they painted her gray.
@jeffreymcewen51944 жыл бұрын
BRITAIN should invest in these ships for our Royal Marines
@RR-us2kp4 жыл бұрын
Britain has albion and bulwark
@bulletproofguy51123 жыл бұрын
@@RR-us2kp and the three bay class.
@zcomme2 жыл бұрын
Brit will never ever buy French military equipment for national proud reason even if it's obviously better :)
@BruneSixtine Жыл бұрын
I was against François Hollande's decision, when under American pressure he cancelled the sale of 2 ships like this to Russia. Now with the assault of Ukraine I think it was a good thing eventually. Egypt bought the 2 ships in the end, it's a reliable country and a strong partner, glad to see 5 of such ships in good hands in the Mediterranean.
@gringologie9302 Жыл бұрын
Et le monde entier sait que la France n'est pas un partenaire fiable, y compris quand il s'agit de respecter les contrats signés. On aurait mieux fait de livrer ces navires. La guerre en Ukraine serait sûrement déjà terminé actuellement si ça avait été livré
@BruneSixtine Жыл бұрын
@@gringologie9302 En Ukraine ils n'auraient pas été tellement utiles, les 2 pays ont une longue frontière terrestre. A la limite pour ravitailler plus facilement la Crimée ? Par contre le soutient russe en Syrie et en Libye aurait pu être démultiplié. Et la présence russe avec Wagner au Mali, au Burkina, en République Centrafricaine aurait été augmentée.
@gringologie9302 Жыл бұрын
@@BruneSixtine peut être en permettant un débarquement naval ou que sais je encore de ce qu'avaient les russes en tête. En tout cas nous ne serions pas passé pour des fournisseurs non fiables aux yeux du monde entier. Nous avons aussi perdus l'opportunité d'avoir une belle vitrine de pub pour nos chantiers navals (si les principaux navires des principales marines du monde sont français... Personnellement jen aurai eu le sourire aux lèvres). Je ne vois absolument pas le lien entre Wagner au sahel et la marine russe. Ni de près ni de loin. Par contre oui je vois un rapport avec le théâtre syrien. Il faut arrêter d'essayer de se donner bonne conscience. Nos élites ont fais des choix de merde, soyons objectifs. Le réservoir humain ukrainien ne leur permettra pas de gagner cette guerre. S'alligner sur la position US est une aberration, qui va nous coûter un bras.
@BruneSixtine Жыл бұрын
@@gringologie9302 Les Etats-Unis aussi conditionnent la vente d'équipements militaires. Par exemple la Turquie n'a finalement jamais reçu ses F-35, après son achat de batteries anti-aériennes russes. Cela n'a en aucun cas porté préjudice aux Etats-Unis, au contraire, la plupart des pays étaient content que les turques n'aient pas de F-35. Pareil pour les PHA Mistals, les pays de l'Est sont tous très content que la Russie n'en ai pas reçu. Pour l'Afrique, la France a transporté plusieurs régiments jusqu'à Dakar avec ces bâtiments de projection, des centaines d'hommes et de véhicules pour Serval puis Barkhane. Si la Russie avait ces bâtiments, elle aurait pu faire pareil. Alors Wagner aurait pu débarquer beaucoup plus d'équipements en Afrique, plus vite et plus brutalement. Quand à la guerre en Ukraine, petit à petit il semblerait que les Ukrainiens prennent l'avantage technologique, ils sont mieux équipés que les Russes, ils bénéficient des satellites d'observation des Etats-Unis, d'un plan de bataille établi par les USA, la Russie s'est retranchée, l'avenir nous dira ce qui se passera.
@Peroriperora Жыл бұрын
@@gringologie9302 partenaire pas fiable à tes yeux et à ceux des russes peut être… Rien à foutre donc. On a au contraire envoyé un message très clair et nécessaire pour les futurs clients : Néo-impérialistes, passez votre chemin. Nos équipements ne serviront pas à cela et c’est très bien.
@pipmill70763 жыл бұрын
Good ship. Very flexible for multi missions.
@axaxx25 Жыл бұрын
Uniforms are pretty cool 👍👍👍
@abelewin28553 жыл бұрын
Any country that is able to build this kind of ship, prove it’s greatness.
@IMGreg..3 жыл бұрын
Wow you just cancelled 193 countries who may excel in other areas.
@gooner722 жыл бұрын
It's a pretty decent ship with some excellent features and capabilities, its only flaw is it's severe lack of defensive hardware but obviously it will never be on its own in a high threat area.
@henrikjorgensen16144 жыл бұрын
A real supportship
@christianbenzinger7704 жыл бұрын
The Army Swissnife og Boats! Great!
@donquixote150210 ай бұрын
Fantastic Ship! Vive la France. ❤ from Suede
@colincohen27112 жыл бұрын
Great to see the 316 and 341 are still in service.
@bengilpin21834 жыл бұрын
Love engineering and boats
@lydiaanderson77523 жыл бұрын
@Hello Ben how are you doing?
@gooner722 жыл бұрын
Whilst watching this my neck veins started popping out as I thought about David Cameron selling our HMS Ocean, she was very similar to this and now we've lost a large helicopter carrier which could take Wildcat, Apache, Merlin, Chinook helicopters or about 15 Harriers so she was a decent ship. She could also carry 830 troops, 250 crew plus the aircrew and maintenance crews as well...... she was chuffing awesome!!
@zcomme2 жыл бұрын
HMS Ocean was in end life, Chronically engines problems, ti me for the RN to have new Class vessels
@lukemcgahern23572 жыл бұрын
She could carry harriers but not launch them (here deck was to weak) And besides we have dedicated amphibious ships for amphibious landings that can carry also carry helicopters,not to mention our aircraft carriers are bigger so could hold more helicopters or use one aircraft carrier as a helicopter carrier.
@dynamo17962 жыл бұрын
Never mind, we have two of the most modern aircraft carriers in the world that are twice the size of the French Navy's Charles De Gaulle (which is then itself bigger than this amphibious heli carrier). Its a good ship but nothing new. The UK used to have them, the US Marines have some and this ship is in fact smaller than the Australian Navy's flagship of the same type.
@francinesicard464 Жыл бұрын
@@dynamo1796 But not nuclear aircraft carriers!👋 And we have a new one in construction, the PANG.
@dynamo1796 Жыл бұрын
@@francinesicard464 France is in the same situation as the British when they designed and built the Queen Elizabeth class - build one nuclear carrier or have two conventional carriers. We sensibly opted for two carriers, the French went for one. As they say with heirs and spares - two is one, one is none.
@marioc.77142 жыл бұрын
Les Français sont capables de produire autre chose que des parfums.
@anonviewerciv Жыл бұрын
10:13 Turning into a waterborne dock. ⚓(16:55) 33:20 Rotary aircraft operations. 🛳🚁(42:14)
@davericketts91012 жыл бұрын
Very interesting and well presented documentary, with the one small niggling error of `bow thrusters` 21:46, pronounced like a bow and arrow, as opposed to bow down in front of the king.
@gordonwade8973 жыл бұрын
The royal navy need something like this
@MrFrankydave3 жыл бұрын
LHD’s are good value for money Both Australia’s Canberra class are busy filling many tasks from humanitarian , joint exercises in Asia Pacific and port visits. The ultimate soft power projector Excellent as the center of an amphibious or anti submarine task force. Our LHD’s have really strengthened out relationships in the region which is good for our alliance’s and reputation with other armed forces
@someonesomeone96803 жыл бұрын
Buy one to France
@sarahwilliams7553 жыл бұрын
No, no we do not... It is the dumbest design and only good for the french to use to RUN AWAY.
@someonesomeone96803 жыл бұрын
@@sarahwilliams755 who run away in dunkirk
@dont_give_a_flying_f3 жыл бұрын
Britain does need a few lhd's but built in Britain to a british design. RN doesn't buy foreign built.