Speak No Evil Movie Explained (SPOILERS)

[@masteryehudi7031]

Really illuminating analysis. There's another aspect to this that I felt was important. In the sequence where the Daltons are trying to leave, Paddy keeps testing the limits of their civility. He invites Ben to the shed to get tools to change the tyre, he gets him to climb a ladder to retrieve Agnes' teddy, he taunts the Daltons with innuendos about Louise's affair, and he calls them out that they won't follow up with a text when they're back in London... Paddy's final escalation is to throw Ant in the lake to drown. He knows Ben will dive in to save him. Later Paddy says to Ben "you don't even love your family, if you did you'd have left him (Ant) in the pond". While it's praiseworthy that Ben tried to rescue Ant, there's a sense in which Paddy's right! It's not clear in that context that Ben should dive in the lake, as saving Ant will almost certainly result in his own and his family's death. But diving in the lake to save a drowning boy is kinda the only socially acceptable thing to do. And Paddy's made a psychopathic, correct judgment that Ben will do it. So Ben's act of heroism, to save a drowning boy, is presented as being another attempt to "keep up appearances", like climbing the ladder to get Agnes' toy or leaving his family to follow a serial killer into a toolshed. For me, this is one of the really interesting questions the movie raises... To what extent are our ethical decisions just attempts to manage appearances? Even in our bravest moments, are we all just trying to *look as if* we're doing the right thing? Is morality just civility?

[@Da_bear-ij9gm]

I also loved that moment. It’s kind of what was in the back of my mind throughout the whole movie: if either of these parents truly loved their child or each other, they would have left. When the mom left the kid with a strange man just on the word of people she already didn’t trust that he was a babysitter, it cemented the notion in my mind. They may be attached to their family members, but they don’t really love them. At least, not enough to break a social norm for them

[@tbakesify]

Can't it be both? Does selflessness have to be 100% pure to be true?

[@erincobb3052]

It reminds me of the trolley problem by Philippa Foot, where your on a trolley and it can’t stop and there’s two tracks which you can switch that can change the trolley’s direction, on one track there’s five people and on the other there is only one person. The question is do you switch the track to save five people, killing one person? or do you switch the track to save one person a land kill five people? It questions people’s morals and ethical decision making. In this context of the movie, does Ben jump in to save Ant? saving him but leaving him and his family vulnerable and to be killed, or does he drive on and let Ant drown as he’s thinking of his family, basically sacrifice one person to save his family and possibly more families if he calls the police. But we all know what he chose and it just made the film longer 😅

[@Cheezpopcorn]

Also, Anges' "coming of age" moment also allowed her to begin to let go of childish things. She starts to go from child to empathic "sibling" and finally being able to pass her comfort toy to give comfort to another. Sadly, I believe Ant is deeply disturbed and would require decades of mental health help.

[@112523]

The whole fucking point of the original movie is how these people are ignoring the many red flags cuz they're too polite to even mention them. The remakes ending completely shits on this for the sake of appealing to a wider and mostly American audience. The original got me thinking about it for months. This one will as well, but only as a disappointment. McAvoys acting was great tho

[@Cheezpopcorn]

Im glad I found this video. I dont think i realized how frightening it would be to literally be in the middle of nowhere with aĺl the unresolved relationship/marriage baggage having to wade through unfamiliar territories sociopaths as hosts, and all the while, trying to be "polite."

[@jonfreeman9682]

This is very common. Most people try to be cordial and feel compelled to do things they aren't comfortable with. You try to find a way to get out but in this case it's a setup to scam and kill tourists.

[@ThorogoodFilms]

Ah thanks for your comment!

[@corwinjkabuki]

Wolf Creek season 2

[@Obsidiansoul74]

I live in the countryside. I'm more anxious and unsafe in city's. I could manage a walk out of this house with my kids any day. This film does show how people take advantage of our british keep quiet and carry on ethos.

[@MFLimited]

Welcome to rural Britain 😂

[@emilywest3669]

I’m sorry but NO! that dad at no point rose up to protect his family. The mom stabbed paddy first, then the dad used the hard end of the hammer on the neighbor dude and didn’t do much damage. The wife was the one who used the sharp end and saved her husband. She also hit Ciara to knock her off the roof, and Agnes drugged paddy. That father was a huge failure every step of the way!

[@jacquelinecallejas1390]

He did at least jump from the second story to get the ladder for the others .

[@emilywest3669]

@ yes I remember he did do one thing finally. I should give him that.

[@arielg.2681]

@@emilywest3669 He also jumped into the water to save Ant's life.

[@nvm7191]

@@jacquelinecallejas1390smh he’s an absolute idiot lol there was a lower part of the roof that he could’ve jumped from that was right next to where they were at

[@Timagamezzz]

That dude was a WIMP!!!

[@Randomperson-ht2ey]

"It's not about the kill for me. It's always been about the hunt... yKnow, getting them in the crosshairs, luring fish onto the hook. That's the game. That's what I live for." I've seen this movie 5 times, and this is still the most chilling line in the movie for me.

[@eleegn]

Another great video! So beautifully written. But your voice is mesmerising! Currently binging your content!

[@karishmasinha4686]

The Danish version is truly horrifying

[@skaftias]

Yes very disturbing in deed !!!!!

[@chadkleckler5180]

Yeah, they always distort things when adapting them for the States. Giving this movie a happy ending essentially neutered it.

[@Schlex]

what happened in it?

[@jacquelinecallejas1390]

@@SchlexDO NOT READ IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO BE SPOILED…. ……………………… They kill the boy, they cut out the girl’s tongue with the help of the chef friend, dad has the chance to save them all but does NOTHING, Paddy drives the couple to an embankment makes them take their clothes off and then STONES them to death. Last scene is the little girl being taken to meet their next victims at a vacation spot.

[@chrisjwatkins87]

I thought about that movie for at least 4 months straight I was happy to see the remake

[@MFLimited]

My neighbours LOL. I used to live in the middle of nowhere, not far from Cerne Abbas used to pass the Cerne giant all the time. Walked up that hill on May Day.

[@theclimbto1]

Bro, I kept saying... wait, aren't they from Halt and Catch Fire? Good 1-2 punch there.

[@DDT0030]

This movie reminds me so much of the movie fast and furious 5

[@jonfreeman9682]

I was thinking more the movie breakdown with Kurt Russell. Great movie BTW.

[@jpg6113]

Love your videos mate, keep them coming!!

[@truthhurts-g3o]

Well done Thomas. It's rare that the US version trumps the European original. The Danish version was clever, but it placed the onus of the evil on the protagonists, which was cruel, and made the overall tenor of the film inhumane. It reminded me of 'Silence of the Lambs', which tricked the masses into siding with the murderous cannibal, instead of the noble and hard-working police force. 'Silence of the Lambs' is much more diabolical, as it actually denies Original Sin: Hannibal tells Starling, "Criminals aren't born, they're made". In other words, society creates evil, not individuals, even though society itself is composed of individuals, who are assumed to be 'noble savages'.

[@deec75]

Enjoyed your review, and also enjoyed the film and the creepy creepy feelings of apprehension all the way through. I was briefly left wondering about Ciara having been his original victim with no choice to leave and becoming a folie a deux situation, but she was so far gone along with the horror herself that I couldn’t muster sympathy for what she may also have endured.

[@ThorogoodFilms]

Ah thank you! And that's really interesting. Yeah I was wondering about that too

[@jonfreeman9682]

She was likely captured like 🐜 and suffered Stockholm syndrome and accepted the love of her tormentor. There's actually real life clinical cases like this. But you're right she's too far gone and can't go back. She's in on the scam to rip off and kill tourists. This is similar to that Kurt Russell movie breakdown. Great movie BTW.

[@piapedersen]

I definitely think Ciara was taken originally. The clue for me was that Paddy makes a reference to her taking care of him - he says the same about Agnes before she stabs him with the syringe. Good video. You have a great voice for narration.

[@reallifehannonce5328]

OK so my big question is, if Kira hadn’t died, and instead Paddy and Kira had kept Agnes as bait for the next family, does that mean they’d eventually kill her once they got the next kid? Or would they keep both kids? I saw the photos and it looked like a different kid each time but I’m not sure if Agnes would’ve eventually died or not. Instead, Kira died and Paddy planned to make Agnes his next “wife.”

[@jacquelinecallejas1390]

In the original it is made clear they kill their current kid, cut out the tongue of the next kid and go hunting again so if Keira hadn’t died Ant would be killed and this little girl would replace him.

[@damianstarks3338]

Great new video of this remake

[@ThorogoodFilms]

Ah thanks man!

[@damianstarks3338]

@@ThorogoodFilmsDon’t mention it keep these videos coming !

[@andrew9409]

I subscribed!!! This was excellent analysis!!!

[@ThorogoodFilms]

Ah thanks! Great to have you here.

[@chadkleckler5180]

Watch the original if you haven't. There is no way that the message of this version is the originally intended message. The ending has been completely Americanized here.

[@BloodWolfy]

The new version is missing the point of the original movie

[@ninagee4511]

James McAvoy stole the show! It's amazing how he plays a pacifist hero like Prof X and is terrifying as a merciless villain (Kevin/The Beast and this movie).

[@kilsteez]

why did she pause and look shocked when she picked up the same fork she ate goose off of later in the movie to use it as a weapon?????

[@saraleite3669]

Remembering what it was used for earlier maybe

[@kilsteez]

@@saraleite3669 no she made a remark like "you motherfucker" or something

[@Diazo--Diamante]

Teddys Wife is the same age as me. God I've missed out on life.

[@michaeloconnell7274]

Mr. Dalton could have chose to give into his carnal desire when he had the chance to shoot Paddy but Paddy would have liked for him to do that, the same way he gets enjoyment from making others do things they wouldn't usually do or don't really want to do, pushing their boundaries further and further. Unfortunately Ant gave in... It's very possible that Ant will develop a desire for blood, as Paddy and his behaviors came to exist from deep trauma...So will Ant's. hence why we must 'forgive those who trespass against us' because if we don't forgive we will potentially feel entitled to do unto others as others have done to us. Long story short Ant gave away his soul for revenge and Mr. Dalton chose to keep his.

[@Tomy_Yon]

As a vegan, I was genuinely disturbed by her eating the meat. 😊

[@ThorKAH]

This one is mid the danish one is terrifying

[@112523]

After having seen it. The remake is completely pointless and misses the point if the original. The ending was also very weak and felt like a very typical modern American ending

[@mynameisjefferson3771]

The third act was the point. The original left a lot of ppl pissed at the movie. And for such a brilliant setup, it needed “a very typical modern American comedy ending.”

[@Vidarr90]

Tbf, I think the point was the new ending. The original was super depressing and just left you feeling sad which many people may not like, this one at least may appeal to that typical American consumer that wants a happy ending

[@eddiejc1]

Americans don't like downbeat endings, especially films where kids are hurt or killed. So I knew that they would change the ending. However, that original ending is what made the first film so powerful.

[@jacquelinecallejas1390]

I also think it would be a harder sell to think that AMERICANS could be THAT inhibited by politeness. We are also ON AVERAGE more violent than many other cultures so I think the original ending is even less plausible and less palatable for an American film. Think about it. When have you heard of school shootings in Denmark, the Netherlands or England? We act like it is normal.

[@mgoogleuser8011]

Just Say No!

[@Petunia00]

Such a radio voice

[@waynemcauliffe-fv5yf]

Great film

[@PeePea]

What is it called when people write ben type characters in movies..?.. idiocy? Fantasy? Wait I got it its pandering

[@southsidecustoms17]

Didn’t like the feminisation of Ben. He wore a skirt throughout the whole movie😂

[@MENACE-km6bd]

Right! You're only a man if you can take off your shirt.

[@shreddhead23]

😎🙏💯

[@ncm222]

why didnt he kill ciara when she was one of his victims too?

[@jonfreeman9682]

She's not a victim. Unless she's suffering Stockholm syndrome.

[@Da_bear-ij9gm]

I think she was lying about that

[@kendrickmelendez8185]

Bro the ending verified that it’s true when he tells the couple his intentions with their daughter at the end. Confirming her claims

[@corwinjkabuki]

The ending of the original was way better

[@Da_bear-ij9gm]

I thought it was needlessly depressing and almost nonsensically so. They just watched their daughter get her tongue cut out and decide to quietly go along and do whatever their captor says after that? Instead of making any attempt to go save her, they’ll just lay down and die? So they learned absolutely nothing from the entire 2 hour movie and the audience is left feeling like it was all a bit of a waste

[@kiffu94]

@@Da_bear-ij9gm I did.t know there was a orginal. And waching now this remake.. I was so hoping they die. Just bc i did.t care about the cast and the polite yes gives. Don.t let it be a cliche ending and it was. 3 ppl with guns vs 2 ultra nice ppl. YEAH ...

[@keithwierz1]

Original is a joke remake is a million times better Original is on par with the skin lift movie FROZEN

[@lurkzie]

Biggest plot hole of the movie is why didn't any of the kids held hostage just run away or write an sos letter?

[@jasipen1353]

Well Ant was foreign so the daughter couldn’t understand any of the notes he tried to write to her. So they must know multiple Languages and if they kidnapped the daughter, the next family Just would have to be one who didn’t know English .

[@lurkzie]

@@jasipen1353 I'm not just talking about Ant, im talking about any of the many kids they kidnapped prior to his family. You're telling me not one of them was able to escape?

[@jasipen1353]

@@lurkzie Maybe escaping, sure, kids could have tried harder. But these kids also all watched their parents get murdered so maybe too scared. On top of that, like I said above, they likely only took the kidnapped kids to foreign areas where they didn’t know the language (such as this case with Art) so they couldn’t ask much for help even when they had the opportunity to

[@lurkzie]

@@jasipen1353 If you need to come up with your own logic to fill in the gaps in the movie's plot it just emphasises the terrible writting. Dont get me wrong I enjoyed the film, but the reveal of the twist kinda ruined the established realism and turned them into cartoon villains.

[@illiatiia]

​@@lurkzie Most killers say victims don't actually try. It's common for victims to be incredibly passive.

[@ДаняСаго]

Movie is shit just like all western movies, not even close to the original, pathetic imitation and a woke coward as a director

[@thatmovieguy7778]

I know right the husband was such a pxssy it pissed me off lol