The Concorde and the Tu-144 should have been included.
@otonielcausor2832 Жыл бұрын
they aint fighters.
@RedcoatT Жыл бұрын
@@otonielcausor2832 The title was fastest manned aircraft, they both qualify.
@gigganigga262 Жыл бұрын
fastest (armored, Militäry) Aircraft that's what they mean
@droman608 Жыл бұрын
And the X-34 as well since experimental aircraft are included.
@averagespino Жыл бұрын
bro the concorde isnt fast enough
@miguelrosario7302 Жыл бұрын
The swept wing MiG-23 Flogger, Backfire bomber, and F-111 Aardvark need their swing-wings swept back in order to achieve supersonic flight.
@katherineberger6329 Жыл бұрын
One nit to pick: The image of the Bell X-2 (which crashed, killing Mel Apt) is not the right plane. That is the X-1-1 (46-062, "Glamorous Glennis"), which had a maximum speed of about Mach 1.2 - the first plane to break the sound barrier. Apt's death happened because he had pushed his airplane beyond the Mach-3 threshold that computers could then simulate and his airplane lost control due to inertia coupling.
@Toxic_Man_9 ай бұрын
I know MiG-25, MiG-31, MiG-29! Most of all, I'm surprised by the MiG-23! The 3rd generation aircraft overtook the 5th generation aircraft!
@jsstt Жыл бұрын
5:01 the cruise ship is fast asf
@HalfPastV9 ай бұрын
lol
@Sgtgee6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 going Mach 2 in the other direction on water.
@FourBrothers-s3f28 күн бұрын
Have you seen how fast the Darkstar and the Pencil Jet are? The Darkstar flies at Mach 10, whereas the X-16X, dubbed the Pencil Jet, flies at Mach 65 for space flight, Mach 38 for land speed. For the Darkstar, you'd feel that boom as you would hear it, while the Pencil Jet would just be a flashing dot in the sky. However, we liked the Aardvark.
@peterjohnston122411 ай бұрын
Please remember to include the Canadian Avro Arrow. Built in the mid-1950's, with the planned Orenda engine, it was forecasted to exceed Mach 2.4. The Skyrocket had exceeded Mach 2.0 in 1955, but it was a research aircraft. The Avro Arrow was intended for mass production. Five were built. Four were destroyed. One has never been found.
@dukeford10 ай бұрын
You don't get points for potential. The Arrow only made it to M1.9.
@onetruehuff82 Жыл бұрын
Technically the "fastest manned aircraft" is the Space Shuttle measured at speeds "over 17,000 mph"
@tristansundquist1834 Жыл бұрын
I always forget about the SU-47. Very beautiful jet.
@Phalanx1110 ай бұрын
My dad, a GS-51 worked at P&W for 40 years. He was head of publications, so whenever you saw an advertisement for P&W, he was in charge of it.
@UnitZER0 Жыл бұрын
Slight nitpick: the swing-wing jets would have their wings fully swept back at top speed. They only swing their wings forward to take off and land. Also, the SR-71 model depicted is incorrect, that is an A-12. The SR-71 has a distinctive hump. Same family, different aircraft.
@davidmurphy2903 Жыл бұрын
I had a model of that particular F-14 Tomcat. VF-84, Jolly Rogers, 202, USS Nimitz. This squadron, and that particular aircraft stars in both The Final Countdown, and Executive Decision. No fighter had a more menacing livery.
@troywalker8078 Жыл бұрын
Fun video! Nice work, Jeevan.
@aeropug Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@Lockinhardenemy Жыл бұрын
Props to the camera man
@knowplay3258 Жыл бұрын
While all these speeds are attainable by the respective aircraft, most can only do so at extreme maximum attitude then falling into a steep dive with full thrust. The more accurate comparison would be supersonic cruise speeds within operation altitude. The US X series of experimental aircraft are all rocket propelled, which is a completely different set of characteristics than the other aircraft. The MiG25 "Foxbat" could reach Mach 3.2 to 3.5 at operational altitudes, but to do so the pilot had to push the engines so hard that they would either damage themselves beyond repair or just completely destroy themselves. The Valkyrie and the Su-47 were failed experiments that flew as proof-of-concept aircraft moreso than anything operational. As you get closer to the Earth's surface, the air gets more dense thus causing exponentially more linear friction on the leading edges of an aircraft. This makes supersonic flight at near sea-level altitudes impossible for 99.9% of aircraft. This is due to either lack of sufficient thrust, drag coefficients being too great, or extreme heat from friction causing material failure. A few of the aircraft shown can reach supersonic at near sea-level, if even for very short periods. The MiG25 and it's younger brother, the MiG31. The F-14 was notorious for doing so because naval aviators liked causing chaos on the water's surface. The F-15 can in short bursts as can the Eurofighter Typhoon. At low altitudes, many of the other aircraft have to dive to reach Mach speeds. The fastest jet propelled aircraft can cruise at Mach 1.5 at 10k to 20k feet elevation, which is a testament to its design as doing so is EXTREMELY taxing on almost any other aircraft. That would be the SR-71 Blackbird and it's older brother, the A-12. So all these speeds are viable by their respective aircraft...just many caveats exist to do so. Btw...great video and awesome animations!!!
@ThuhElement10 ай бұрын
Great information!
@shaldurprime71546 ай бұрын
The REDSIDE vibes are off the charts
@Kneecaptain Жыл бұрын
Cameraman: Hurry up.
@SoyElLoboGris13 Жыл бұрын
Props to the cameraman for going at the speed of light to film it
@rus-the-editor Жыл бұрын
they used the ISS to film it probably
@Yahooligan7211 ай бұрын
How old are you?
@SoyElLoboGris1311 ай бұрын
@@Yahooligan72 bro its a joke
@aeropug11 ай бұрын
@@Yahooligan72 🤣
@borntoclimb711611 ай бұрын
Very interesting, nice work
@francesjsantiago Жыл бұрын
The camera man definitely deserves an Oscar 💀💀
@tamito929811 ай бұрын
Perfect video Watched couple of times
@aeropug11 ай бұрын
thank u :)
@MarcusValerioXR Жыл бұрын
AMAZING! Can I use a small segment (something about 90s) in a video in my channel? I'm talking about the fact that, unlike popular beliefs about continuous tecnhological development, the fastest crafts ever were all built in the 60s. I'll put reference, card, link etc, to this video and channel.
@aeropug Жыл бұрын
Sure u can use it but do include the credit.
@spinynorman887 Жыл бұрын
Marcus, you might want to source someone who knows what they are talking about. Pug doesn't know the difference between an X-1 and an X-2. And it's a pretty obvious difference.
@MarcusValerioXR Жыл бұрын
@@spinynorman887but the point was just use a couple of images over a narration already done. Anyway, as he took some time to aswer, I published with other images.
@jacw2485 Жыл бұрын
Pov your the camera man: yes im flying in a darkstar
@FerSpada Жыл бұрын
Great music 🤘😎☝
@codydolphin Жыл бұрын
X-15 is crazy!
@aldenhd2273 Жыл бұрын
Nah man the sr-72 darkstar is mach 10
@darfderkevinspielenkommen1253 Жыл бұрын
@@aldenhd2273and also not real
@hévfan57810 ай бұрын
Best 3D comparison
@shaldurprime71546 ай бұрын
The panavia tornado looks so scuffed from the side, I'm reminded of those Baby Boeing photoshops where 90% of the fuselage is cut out
@edutaimentcartoys6 ай бұрын
wow 4k video ... How long did it take you to make the video?
@quithanh30182 ай бұрын
The cameraman 🗿🍷
@cmac9029 Жыл бұрын
AFAIK, the X-15 is considered a different class of craft. As of now, the fastest *known* air-breathing craft is the SR-71, but that will in all likely hood be smashed by the forthcoming SR-72….
@birdmcrandomsux Жыл бұрын
If the US says its being researched/conceptualized, chances are it’s already in service
@cameronwulff11 ай бұрын
The x15 is rocket powered. It's essentially a rocket with wings and a seat
@bidet15156 ай бұрын
nice bang show at the end ;)
@Cold_DEATH Жыл бұрын
idk how fast the cameraman have to go
@33Initiative Жыл бұрын
great video!
@aeropug Жыл бұрын
Thank you 😊
@Maazullah. Жыл бұрын
Bro woke up and escaped the matrix and started thinking out of the box 💀
@Hafidz_Muhammad_Arief. Жыл бұрын
I really like this video 🥰
@aeropug Жыл бұрын
I'm glad you like it
@sukhoisu-27flankerbdude92 Жыл бұрын
Your animations are so cool
@katherineberger6329 Жыл бұрын
The F-15: The greatest fighter jet ever built. 104-0. Every Eagle pilot goes up with two things in mind: No F-15 has ever been shot down by another airplane. They're not going to be the first.
@265justy Жыл бұрын
The planes it fought were mostly old Migs flown by poorly trained pilots with no AWACs support, only guided by ground control radar.. The F-16 and F/A-18 can actually whip the ass off an F-15 in a dogfight.
@GoofBean Жыл бұрын
@@265justyactually, the f14 can whip the F16s and FA/18s ass, and the F15 can whip the F14s ass. Only the F22 can beat it
@265justy Жыл бұрын
@@GoofBean F-14 is retired.. It's BVR... WAS.. Good in the 80s.. IF its Phoenix missiles may have been reliable enough.. In a dogfight.. It stood... ZERO chance against an F-16... Absolutely ZERO..
@30AndHatingIt Жыл бұрын
Ahem. I have plenty of pilot accounts as well as a few DACT cockpit footage of Tomcats splashing F-16’s…
@265justy Жыл бұрын
@@30AndHatingIt F-16s were used as aggressors to simulate a range off aircraft from the Mig-21 right up to Flanker.. They were never flown full up the majority off the time. It all came down to the plane it was meant to simulate in certain scenarios..
@alexanderkuzin45509 ай бұрын
The cameraman 😎😎😎
@Burg1238 Жыл бұрын
Can't believe Su-57 was slower than Su-47
@juhovalio5906 Жыл бұрын
Why? Modern jets tend to be slower than cold war era jets. F-22 is slower than f-15.
@radontrailmakers Жыл бұрын
@@juhovalio5906 speed is not as much of a priority in modern jets. It is better avionics, maneuverability and most importantly stealth in fifth-gen aircraft. It won't make much difference if you go mach 2 or mach 3 to a hypersonic missile.
@Russão000 Жыл бұрын
@@juhovalio5906Modern jets was made for Less radar signature so this can Make Aerodynamic a little worse and the speed can damage the Expensive Stealth Coverage (paint)
@StarwarsHalofreak Жыл бұрын
All that speed isn't really going to matter much in a dogfight if you keep overshooting your target, letting the enemy get on your tail to take potshots at you. During the Korean War, a new, cutting edge US F-84 Thunderjet tried to get on the tail of a rickety, old KPAAF Po-2 biplane, but wound up stalling and crashing.
@mihailraskin29129 ай бұрын
It's shown incorrectly. It's max speed is M=2.45, and M=2.1 is a cruise speed. And they will get a new engine soon.
@Nicholas1010110 ай бұрын
Fantastic!
@danyailpathan184411 ай бұрын
Camera man never dies
@nickbutter927011 ай бұрын
Skull Leader (Tomcat) is the best. That fighter jet was the basis of one of my favorite Anime ... Robo Tech
@richardtibbitts38419 ай бұрын
Great video! However, though the speed of sound at sea level and 68ºF is 760 mph, Mach numbers are calculated at 36,000 feet and -70ºF. Under those conditions, the speed of sound is around 660 mph.
@aeropug9 ай бұрын
Thanks for the info!
@dukeford10 ай бұрын
Left out a few older planes: F-105, F-106, A5, Su-15.
@danielrichardson4868 Жыл бұрын
Concorde is the queen of the sky, flew more than 100,000 supersonic hours, and took over 1,000,000 passengers at supersonic speeds
@EnZo-hg2gk Жыл бұрын
some to heaven aswell
@Wolf_Dominic11 ай бұрын
@@EnZo-hg2gk If you’re referring to what I believe you are, it was one fatal crash, out of a total of 50,000 passenger flights. It really truly was one of the safest passenger jets ever flown. But of course, all’s it takes is one, to tarnish a reputation like that forever.
@Wolf_Dominic11 ай бұрын
If you weren’t referring to that, then ignore my previous comment.
@adeleaizzzara11 ай бұрын
The power of the camera man 💀
@cheeortiz1974 Жыл бұрын
Dear content creator. You are one of the dopest humans alive.
@KyrieeGamez Жыл бұрын
Camera man and ship in the background : 🗿
@vvvxt Жыл бұрын
That is seriously the fastest oil tanker I've ever seen!!!
@Yahooligan7211 ай бұрын
Lamer than "props to the camera man" comment
@vvvxt11 ай бұрын
@@Yahooligan72 Three people disagree
@saza625010 ай бұрын
Good video but hear me out : 1 - you made those aircraft fly above the sea which it prevent us to see how fast aircraft is so you better put at background a city or anything to rely on to see the speed 2 - still need to improve yourself the aircrafts doesn't sound like she fasting which another problem of the speed that unrelated to the background 3 - music is good 🔥 I wish I could help you to improve yourself to be the best Inshaealah
@MMT930110 ай бұрын
7:25 I saw SR71 blackbird and many of these aircrafts in “Buck Danny” comic books….
@rizkymashudi7044 Жыл бұрын
the cameraman speed is crazyyy
@mikekerr674711 ай бұрын
Growing up in Warner Robins Georgia we heard sonic booms every day. I used to sit across from the base and watch the f-15's take off and go straight up to heaven and then BOOM!
@aeropug11 ай бұрын
🔥
@leezinke4351 Жыл бұрын
Wow!
@NSXrx Жыл бұрын
where is this numbers from? looks like random or theoretically speeds.
@thevoid0109 ай бұрын
Its not? Its from fucking research data. If you look at the wiki pages for these aircraft you can easily find their speed. Do research
@tasoh999 ай бұрын
The mig 25 could only reach mach 3.2 with 2 missles, not 4. But I'm really nitpicking now. Otherwise was very much fun to watch.
@thevoid0109 ай бұрын
And itll melt its engines lol
@dontgustous0111 ай бұрын
CAMERA MAN WINS
@plantfeeder667710 ай бұрын
The A-12 was faster than the SR-71. There were several X planes that exceeded Mach 2. You could've paid homage to the very first aircraft to fly twice the speed of sound, the Douglas D-558 by including it. That wasn't the X-2. That was the Bell X-1 that broke the sound barrier in 1947.
@baosam50539 ай бұрын
No matter how fast the jet could fly big ship can do the same WOW.
@rezzrespatiofficial6 ай бұрын
❤
@shiningwizard53227 ай бұрын
9:40 Best Sound Barrier Break By F-16
@skydivekid01 Жыл бұрын
That wasn’t the SR 71 it was the A12
@KyrieeGamez Жыл бұрын
It was the SR 71
@orbitron2330 Жыл бұрын
It should’ve been the A-12 the A-12 was slightly faster than the sr-71
@gamma2581 Жыл бұрын
The model was a a 12 you are correct
@FieldTulip20095 ай бұрын
Why didn’t you add the nasa x43 and the sr 72 darkstar
@DVD28810 ай бұрын
Do concept plane speed next
@chaosmachine369 Жыл бұрын
The fastest thing here was the cameraman
@bobbelleci9995 Жыл бұрын
The Space Shuttle 😅
@АлександрКовалев-щ7г7 ай бұрын
Пуля из автомата ак летит со скоростью 3500000/в час неплохо бы об этом помнить .😂🇷🇺☝в час км .😂🇷🇺☝
@andersonsantiagodasilva963 Жыл бұрын
SR 71 Black Bird... sound track??
@aeropug Жыл бұрын
its in the description
@andersonsantiagodasilva963 Жыл бұрын
@@aeropug7min19sec?
@andersonsantiagodasilva963 Жыл бұрын
I lost
@aeropug Жыл бұрын
@@andersonsantiagodasilva963 Here it is Aim To Head - ASMODEUS
@shaldurprime71546 ай бұрын
32 blackbirds? I thought there was maybe half a dozen not including prototypes and experimental craft
@andia.4980 Жыл бұрын
Max. speed of the Eurofighter is Mach 2.35…
@mikehotwheelz9 ай бұрын
Shame the Tornado shown was the the IDS not the ADV
@gouravfromuk9 ай бұрын
Should have added darkstar from top gun 😜😜
@ccfun923210 ай бұрын
The camera man 💀
@Blueesteel_ Жыл бұрын
Your numbers and models are off… the bell x2 for example. Top speed was 2,094.
@kaczoroskigaming385010 ай бұрын
Pov camera man
@delvonhall3469 Жыл бұрын
The Blackbird and the F-14 Tomcat will always be my favorite…..
@kimhobel3 ай бұрын
Your conversion between mach number and km pr. hour don't add up. According to your calculations the speed of sound is about 1234,6 km. per hour. (342 m. pr. second) The speed of sound depending on air tempeture is around 1080 km pr. Hour (300 m pr. second) You write: mach 2,25 = 2778 km pr. hour. (Su 35) Mach 2,25 = 2430 km. pr. hour. A difference of 348 km per hour.
@331Grabber10 ай бұрын
I thought the Phantom was faster. Saw its speed rated at mach 2.4+ more than once.
@jackkarg257810 ай бұрын
Add the B-58 Hustler.....
@MrVilokАй бұрын
Maybe the F-15 does not have mach 2.5, but 2500 km / h?
@am_KLVHD3 ай бұрын
Interesting that am watching on 2× the speed 😂
@xaraxen10 ай бұрын
What on earth the cameraman was flying in...?
@FreddieDredd5549 Жыл бұрын
Darkstar SR-72: Bruh I'm faster
@Lockinhardenemy Жыл бұрын
But the dark star is not done
@owenswoveland5595 Жыл бұрын
The cameraman
@mundobey3235 Жыл бұрын
Quais as músicas?
@HotWheels20034 ай бұрын
Music name plase❤
@ИванСтоянов-о2б Жыл бұрын
Name of the first track please
@aeropug Жыл бұрын
check the description
@ИванСтоянов-о2б Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@HasanAro Жыл бұрын
Bro forget about sr-72 Darkstar💀
@265justyАй бұрын
That's not a Bell X-2.. It's an X-1 and your MPH ratings are all about 200 mph above were they should be..
@Phalanx1110 ай бұрын
Also you have one error in your otherwise magnificent video. The planes going full speed like the Flogger should have their wings swept back. Forward wings are for slow speed manueverability.
@plantfeeder667710 ай бұрын
One error? I counted three and a major ommission.....he didn't include the first plane to go mach 2. That makes this whole video incomplete.
@Phalanx1110 ай бұрын
@@plantfeeder6677 You mean the Bell X-1?
@royevans45818 ай бұрын
You missed out Suzuki Hayabusa.
@aeropug8 ай бұрын
?
@royevans45818 ай бұрын
@@aeropug Never mind.
@andybaijandhyala1896 Жыл бұрын
WHY DID YOU NOT INCLUDE THE x-43 a?!?!
@aeropug Жыл бұрын
Bcoz it's unmanned!
@jean-charlesDANIS-vj6ls8 ай бұрын
The Bell X-1 doesnn"t exceed Mach 1 (straight wings)
@nollun63608 ай бұрын
All wrong. At high altitudes, where can be such speed reached, is speed of sound about 1100km/h. You did it with 1230km/h, thats speed of sound at sea level
@dragunovbushcraft15210 ай бұрын
Hey Jeevan. You'd better dig a little deeper with your research. Your numbers are WAY off.
@nixongamez1427 Жыл бұрын
Si se fijan bien las colas de los aviones americanos tienen las colas más rectas asia arriba
@kimbori1239 ай бұрын
Where is KF-21BORAMA?
@e.bilguun-erdene Жыл бұрын
SR-72 Darkstar?
@ajoy787 Жыл бұрын
Not a real plane
@ajoy787 Жыл бұрын
Not a real plane
@labeussbeuss162210 ай бұрын
Pas de Rafale ?
@265justyАй бұрын
Rafale can't hit Mach 2..
@lewis7515Ай бұрын
80% of this was a waste of time as there was no impression of relative speed, whatsoever. You may as well have put up stills.