Spider-Man Out of the MCU? - Latest News - Reaction / Rant

[@NagarjunaYempati]

I really hope DISNEY and SONY watch this video. You guys explained exactly what fans want to say

[@xTaintedRedx]

Well that new intro is beyond adorable, how dare you

[@01calvin02]

As much as I love Spider-Man and want him in the MCU where I truly do think he belongs this is Disney’s fault (and I work for Disney). Going from a 5% cut to 50% is insane even with them wanting to split the production cost. But I do believe they’ll work it out in the end. Spider-Man is just to important in the marvel universe

[@cryhwks]

It was 30,

[@01calvin02]

cory hawks nope..it was a 50/50 split Disney wanted and Tom Rothman on Sony’s side was only willing to go 25%

[@mannylugz5872]

Disney is greedy as fuck.

[@brock7047]

Thank god they fixed it!

[@jordanhenrichs620]

Jay and Adam are awesome parent counselors and they don't even know it! :)

[@katschaccc]

Disney screwed this up. They had a deal but Disney is getting greedy.

[@cryhwks]

They used that character for the part of the story they wanted, and now with all the stuff they've added its just not worth it to them to focus on something they think that their not getting enough of a return on.

[@eliascrooker7773]

It's Sony's fault.

[@Julia-qv5ls]

Before I actually listen, I think I can guess Jay’s reaction from the thumbnail...Yup, I was right. I love your idea of “staying together for the kids” but instead of us as the kid, the kid is Tom Holland. If these “arrangements” last until the kid is grown and out of the house then we have 7 or 8 years (2 to 3 movies) because Tom looks 12.

[@ttmariem2433]

It's greed from both studios. None of their executives are gonna go broke from sharing Spiderman and still the can't just be civil.

[@roojieq86]

This is a loss-loss situation for both parties, they need to work this out ASAP. They did too much of setting Tom Holland up as the new RDJ of the MCU to let this fall apart now. The beauty of the MCU is that it is all interconnected and after endgame and far from home, to have to recon the whole thing makes absolutely no sense to me. Even Fiege's comments saying, "we told the story we wanted to tell.." makes no sense considering the last film ended on such a big cliffhanger... I am hoping this isn't a done deal.

[@cryhwks]

Yeah but in the last Spider-Man movie what they did was take him out of Iron Man's shadow and make him Spider-Man. Which what was cool about that is when Spider-Man is Spider-Man not only are you your on hero, but what also comes with that his the public for the most part thinking your a menace.

[@ExclusiveBuysCorner]

To be clear it's the fault of Disney. They wanted controlling interest over Spider-Man. It's all in the report that was put out for everyone to read. Sony doesn't need Disney either. While they made Spider-Man 3 and the amazing Spider-Man 2... They also made into the Spiderverse the first Amazing Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2. Disney's greed got in the way. There's no problem with wanting more money but they wanted control over production as well.

[@cryhwks]

They apparently need Disney to make a Billion dollar Spider-Man movie. And btw Kevin Feige worked on all of the Spider-Man movies, including the Rami ones.

[@ExclusiveBuysCorner]

I listed one animated movie. The others were live action. Feige was a producer yes but had very little to do with them. He was working g on other projects. All the Spider-Man sony made did over 700 million minimum. Sony made great Spider-Man movies without Disney. Like Spider-Man 2 which is one of the 10 best comic book movies of all time.

[@eliascrooker7773]

It's Sony's fault.

[@jasonsanfillipo1426]

This really sucks , but we could see venom and spiderman and sinister six . Marvel was getting 5% it's not being greedy to ask for more plus split the cost of making them . I really think Marvel should just put an offer to buy back the movie rights .

[@robertkendall6747]

Totally agree with you guys on this. Spidey needs to stay in the MCU! He's been my favourite superhero since I was three years old, and I've known for years that he's the heart of Marvel. Fingers crossed that Disney and Sony can work things out!

[@xTaintedRedx]

Why do they keep doing my main man dirty? Like can we just have Spider-Man be a good thing for more than a few years please? Spider-Man and Venom have always ALWAYS been my favorite. This is so disappointing.

[@andreastrandlien440]

This news is so sad! I can't imagine what a non-MCU Tom Holland movie would look like...especially after he has been so entrenched. I mean, no Happy/aunt drama; no mention of the whole stepping up as the next iron man or his crazy new suits...and now that he is unmasked, I can't imagine Fury or the other Avengers not stepping in at any point or how he would protect himself in the public image without more help than Aunt May (what with the accords in place now and all) i mean, what would the movie even be about if they don't have any of this stuff going on? Would it basically be a full reboot with the same actor? Because, ugh, I am SO over the spiderman reboots. They finally got him right, why are they messing with it?!!? 😣😢😭

[@kevinwendellcrumb1802]

Screw that. Disney has enough money, Sony shouldn’t budge in the slightest.

[@XxXDestroyer]

I don't think Disney should get 50% but giving them a measly 5% of first day sales is ridiculous. Disney's work on the films is valued much more than that.

[@jason8897386]

#8:25 Thor, Black Panther, Ant Man, War Machine, Dr Strange, Wanda. Plenty of people left. However this version of Spider Man just worked so well with the old and new pieces of the MCU its heartbreaking to not see it continue.

[@Sambow23]

Into the Spiderverse was great. Just gotta give them a 2nd chance on live action

[@eliascrooker7773]

Meh

[@gr81disp]

The Amazing Spiderman series WAS their 2nd chance after screwing up Spiderman 3.

[@jinxie712]

Heard that Marvel has to okay Sony to do a Spider-man game.

[@Godzilla-tu2cd]

10:42 yeah rush out a sinister six movie. That'll work perfectly instead of building up spiderman's enemies

[@pinkfloyde9191]

can yall check out new blair witch game 22 min demo gameplay from IGN

[@mathsalot8099]

I'm very excited for Sony's non-MCU Spiderman Universe: Into the Spiderverse. You think Disney would ever do that? NO, they would Pixar-ify the crap out of it!! All these Sony Spiderman Nay-sayers, but if tomorrow Sony announced a stand-alone live action Spiderman movie starring Tom Holland written and directed by Lord and Millar... 75% of them would suddenly change their tune.

[@Sambow23]

It's Disney's fault

[@eliascrooker7773]

No, it's Sony's.

[@XxXDestroyer]

Not really, it's both.They need to find a middle ground.

[@KCATWIL]

I'd rather see Spiderman and the sinister 6 as per the MCU build-up....than Spiderman and Venom 🤢

[@DRockeh]

Billionaires are fighting over Millions of Dollars. :(

[@danielgibeault8060]

Well hopefully we get insomniacs spider man 2 ps4 game Also I bet toby Maguire is pissed about this news

[@jencreamer3486]

I need Sony and Disney to watch your video and get their sh*t together.

[@danielgibeault8060]

Adam and Jay's next video Adam: thanos wiped out the mcu. And that's just playing dumb. And I'm pissed off

[@luminaorchis4376]

Disney’s being greedy. I love having Spidey in the MCU; but I’m siding with Sony here. Spiderman is the property of Sony; and while Sony has had a couple of stumbles- they’ve also had some really good films (including Spiderman 1, Spiderman 2, The Amazing Spiderman 1 & Spiderman: Into the Spiderverse). And as they’re a professional movie studio- they learn from their missteps. Neither Sony nor Disney “need” Spiderman in the MCU; but both Sony and Disney would benefit with Spiderman in the MCU. That said- I’m still hopeful that they’ll mend fences. Cheers!

[@jinxie712]

Not. Disney wanted to co-produce the movies 50/50. That means 50% of the revenue. Sony would rather have the 95% they were getting for only putting the money up for the movies and not actually doing anything making it.

[@luminaorchis4376]

jinxie712 Disney wants too much- 50% of the revenue for all Spiderman adaptations (including Venom, Morbius, etc)- resulting in Sony relinquishing some of the control of their own properties. If Sony film makes $800M- they keep it all. If a coproduction makes $1.2B- Sony only gets $600M. It’s better for them financially to not settle for 50%. That’s just smart business.

[@jinxie712]

@@luminaorchis4376 and if they start making a bunch of Amazing Spider-mans that no one wants to see over time? Right now they are making money off of movies others are making. What do you think will happen when Tom "X3, Rise of the Silver Surfer, X-Men Origins, Elektra, Daredevil" Rothman is in charge of the movies himself?

[@luminaorchis4376]

jinxie712 Right- because studios have thrived throughout the decades by repeating the same missteps. 😂 I think they’d shift Lord & Miller to help oversee the film division. Though I’m still hoping that Disney and Sony come to an agreement; it ain’t over yet.

[@jinxie712]

@@luminaorchis4376 well, they did take on Tom Rothman.

[@wileyrileyrc9371]

I want Sony and Marvel to figure this out but I don't want Disney having a monopoly on everything Marvel and Sony's into the spider verse was really good I want Sony to hang on to the rights of Spider Man even if it means him getting kicked out of the MCU

[@Launibu]

I don't care about the companies (both are greedy), but I love the mcu. We already don't have iron man and Cap....we need spiderman. Not sure why they just can't keep the same deal and move on.

[@dwayneanderson2048]

I want to see venom vs spiderman

[@eliascrooker7773]

Ewww no.

[@JT-cm9di]

Great no more Iron boy aka Peter Stark XD

[@iekha_triples7718]

Sony and Disney both too greedy for me... Poor Marvel to lost their child like that... But Marvel can't do anything since they sell their soul to Disney... It's difficult situation... But we don't know what future hold, i hope Spidey have better future and better sequel...

[@cryhwks]

Marvel wouldn't even exist without them.

[@danielgibeault8060]

I'm sorry Adam and Jay but tom Holland sucks as Spider-Man I really want Andrew Garfield back

[@cryhwks]

Look everyone upset about this, Spider-Man will absolutely be back in Marvel, there's just to much money to be made.

[@thefatman2780]

IM OVER ALL THE HEROS OF SUPER. IT WAS A GOOD RUN. OVERSATURATED SIR.

[@monsta6501]

Bye

[@eliascrooker7773]

Bye

[@lordedonnis]

Y'all shouldn't be bombed out to much because I believe Sony can make something work by they self because that Sony has probably learned a lot from marvel studios to the point where sony can carry on there own with spiderman even though I think its bonkers that thy hey are breaking up to, but u have to look at the picture, look up what Tom Holland at D23 backstage when he was interviewed, and u have to think that Sony by themselves had four really good spiderman movies on there even though personally I like all of them some more than others but I did like all of them.

[@eliascrooker7773]

Sony sucks.

[@hecantguardme15]

MCU has nothing without Spiderman ? TF 😂 last time I checked Spiderman has had 7 solo movies and none of them made as much as Black Panther solo movie & they were both introduced into the MCU in Civil War and Black Panther next movie did better ... i'm sure MCU will be fine without Spidey

[@cryhwks]

X-men and all their villains, FF and their villains primarily Doctor Doom, who will be the next Thanos. They have so many characters now, they only character that Marvel would be missing out on is Norman Osborne, and that's about, it. The rest are just part of the Rogues Gallery.

[@hecantguardme15]

cory hawks EXACTLY ❗️❗️❗️ people forgot the MCU existed before Spiderman came in Civil War 🤦🏽‍♂️ people will forget about Spiderman so fast once X-men & fantastic four shows up

[@KittyCatRose]

Welcome to the world of high stakes negotiations, boys and girls! Come on though. Disney's previous deal was pretty good. Disney got ALL the merch, they got to use Spiderman in their Marvel movies, they got to use him in their theme parks, AND they got 5% off the TOP of the box office for Sony Spiderman movies. That was a pretty sweet deal. When Disney went to the table and suggested 50% of the box office profits, yyyeeea....ok....sure - they would put up 50% of the marketing and movie making costs, sounds fair. Until you learn they didn't bother to cut Sony in on ANY of the merch or theme park money, they just did a grab for a bigger piece of the money pie. SO, their offer wasn't really to become "partners". LOL So, Sony just gave a middle finger and walked. Nothing is set in stone until it's set in stone though, so there's still room to keep fingers crossed!