Stages of the New Plan for Mars Exploration

[@PamDavis-xo2fi]

Don't strive for perfection but strive for progression!

[@Onepiece0752]

We r going to Mars within my lifetime, I'm happy about it❤

[@Zack-cr9ic]

No, we're not.

[@tylersaurus4702]

@@Zack-cr9icTruth is we don’t know, but it’s not impossible we are. In fact, the new space race makes it almost certain we’re going to mars as early as the 2040s, but realistically around the 2050s.

[@jtfromthebronx]

Hey, I just want to share the love. I really enjoyed this documentary. Very detailed, ringing, realistic and unrealistic expectation into full come I get it

[@jennyanydots2389]

Sounds like a real human comment. No bot.

[@9-xty138]

@@jennyanydots2389🙌😆🙂

[@BillMulholland1]

I wish I would be alive to see this

[@lu-uf8zj]

I hope they can come back alive

[@VrXl17]

If thats you on your profile picture, odds are you will. Best estimates is that we will have people on mars from 2030-2036 and massive civilizations from 2040-2050

[@lu-uf8zj]

@@VrXl17 looking at what is involved and creeping the decline of civilization I don't think there will be any humans on Mars this century.

[@jamesrumsey1074]

@@VrXl17 How does that make money for Lindsay Graham and Chuck Schumer?

[@jamesrumsey1074]

@@lu-uf8zj If it doesn't facilitate money-laundering or capture votes, Congress is never going to approve it. The U.S. annual budget dwarfs the total LIFETIME resources of the top 10 wealthiest private individuals on earth.

[@logicdictates4me]

A new propulsion system needs to be studied getting to Mars . Nuclear propulsion rocket I read could get you to Mars in 45 days. Why isn't this being studed more to make it so.

[@VrXl17]

Too dangerous honestly, you would need a nuclear reactor on a small rocket that needs to be managed by experts 24/7 with expensive and heavy and dangerous cargo which can easily kill everybody on board. not to mention if anything goes wrong theres almost a 100% chance people onboard wil die

[@leonardgibney2997]

How would that work? There's a nuclear reactor powering submarines but in the end it's a steam engine.

[@gulfy09]

Firmament is real// not going anywhere in space

[@Mens_Rights]

@@gulfy09 Your delusions are real. The firmament is not. These are facts that are beyond debate. Yes, I know what you're about to say. "The Bible tells us ..." Don't care. No real adult does.

[@the_new_project]

@@Mens_RightsWow you’re a sensitive person aren’t you? Calm down. We just do not know what the firmament is. Could be around the solar system or galaxy or something else.

[@bankolefasehun9102]

Men on Mars will be the biggest reality TV show ever.

[@favesongslist]

That's what the now defunct "MarsOne" thought.

[@ilokivi]

The Artemis programme reads a lot like NASA’s 90-day report, which costs a ton of money to build, launch and deliver a bunch of infrastructure which doesn’t get humans to anywhere new. Robert Zubrin’s Mars Semi-Direct plan has much to commend it: less expensive, a shorter time frame and more science gets done.

[@lukulamagnus5198]

Do send a link for Zubrin's report. Thanks

[@frankfielder]

@@lukulamagnus5198 I've noticed that when you post a link in a comment the comment is immediately deleted by KZbin.

[@benchaney77]

@@lukulamagnus5198 Theres a good book called Mars Direct that he wrote about it! :)

[@TheDaveyd29]

Artemis is a joke, will get nowhere and deffo will not land on the moon with humans,

[@samr.england613]

@@lukulamagnus5198 According to Bob Zubrin, we could've reached Mars (with people), with 1995 technology! Sure, but, at the time, Zubrin didn't know that Mars' regolith is utterly toxic and riddled with perchlorates, in particular, calcium perchlorate, which is totally lethal and deadly to all known life, including cyanobacteria. There's a way to cleanse the Martian regolith of the perchlorates: By "rinsing" it with copious amounts of fresh, liquid water, something that is not available on Mars. (Liquid water CANNOT exist on the surface of Mars. Water ice goes from ice, to water vapor if it, 'melts', due to the .06 atmospheric pressure.) Zubrin backed himself into a corner before all the facts were in. And the facts are still coming in.

[@andrewwalters1735]

I like the video, but there are two MASSIVE, BASIC, AND FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS that appear to have been overlooked, and have also not been addressed or even mentioned in this video: - 1) How the LACK of EARTH-LIKE GRAVITY will have SERIOUS DETRIMENTAL effects on the crew! 2) The amount of Radiation protection NEEDED for such a long journey in space and for the time living on Mars. So first, let's tackle the gravity problem:- At best, with the current rocket technology available to us, the shortest length of time it will take to journey to Mars is six months, only achievable when its elliptical orbit around the Sun is at its closest to the Earth. This happens roughly every two years. Otherwise, launching outside these close orbit dates would entail a nine / ten month travel time to the Red Planet. Then, once the crew have landed, they'll have to spend at least 18 months on the Martian surface waiting for the next close Earth orbit to come around again before they can leave. Obviously, the journey home will take another six months, so by the end of this whole endeavour, they'll have spent 12 months in zero gravity (the six months journeys there and back) and 18 months on a planet with a third of the gravity of Earth, in total, experiencing 30 months of no Earth gravity. Even if they exercised four hours every day, after such a prolonged experience of no Earth gravity, they'll still end up suffering with some form of muscle atrophy and deterioration of the skeleton, slowing of their cardiovascular system functions, decreased production of red blood cells, balance disorders, eyesight disorders, changes in their immune systems, loss of body mass, and increased nasal congestion. Again, all because of such prolonged exposure to a lack of Earth gravity. And, assuming they survive the homeward bound journey after being so compromised, they'd probably have to wear an Exoskeleton for at least 18 months, just to help them get around and recover some of what they've lost. The "Hard-Science" 2021Science-Fiction film, Stowaway, shows how such a journey to Mars should be done. That is, utilising a central unit / rocket pushing through space with the crewed ship - I'm assuming here that in reality, they would use the Space X vehicle called Star Ship because it has the necessary space/volume - tethered to one end of a spinning / rotating 250m long truss - spinning at 4x a minute to generate and simulate the necessary earth-like gravity needed - and a counter balance tethered to the other end. If Star Ship copied this idea, then the counter balance and / or the central unit could both carry the extra fuel needed to make a controlled decent onto the Martian surface. The Star Ship would then re-attach back to the tether for the journey home, giving the crew much needed earth-like gravity to reacclimatise their bodies after 18 months of 33% gravity on Mars, so that by the time they come home to Mother Earth, they should be fit enough to re-engage with our gravity again. And now the deep space travel radiation and radiation FROM living on Mars problems. The hull of any spaceships travelling for so long in space, and the hulls of any Mars Habitats and Mars Exploration vehicles, would need to have at least 15 inches of lead lining to stop the Gamma radiation from penetrating the ship/habitat/vehicle and killing the crew!!... no where is this basic fact mentioned in the video.

[@artiechavez.5568]

I think during my life time..go go go explore. I like the sounds of the narrator 🎉❤

[@Adeynan]

*Only one thing to be kept in mind.... there is a need of collaboration over competition*

[@nightlightabcd]

No, there isn't !!

[@EugeneDingleBerryFan]

@@Adeynan not necessarily. Back in the Space Race competition was what motivated the USA and the Soviet Union to achieve such great feats in space exploration.

[@dentonfender6492]

@@EugeneDingleBerryFan And then after the series of Moon landings, Tricky Dick Nixon shut it all down, because he needed the money to spend on chronic wars in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. Defense industry billionaires came first, the American people, and progress came last. And every president since embellishes the wealthy with our tax dollars with phony excuse to launch a war, and/or build military bases all over the planet instead of space research.

[@stephenresler]

Collaboration? Really like the worthless Kum-by-ya International 120 Billion Dollar waste of time and money ISS? Get to the Moon and Occupy Mars. Use Zubrin's Case for Mars, modified. Robots first. Build the Base. Send the Humans to finish up ... no 48-hour horseshit missions. Go for 2.1 year missions. Starship and its upgrades will make it happen.

[@aservantofhumanity1272]

Competition drives society!

[@matthewsmatthews456]

What about sending automatic humanoid robots to mars to do agriculture food for the mission.

[@Hunzavlogs.]

Great

[@dentonfender6492]

Fat chance anything will grow on Mars. Too cold, too dry, surface bombarded with ionizing radiation, Cosmic rays, UV rays, and soil is too toxic with perchlorate's. Matt Damon's poop potatoes would not grow in Martian soil. Better idea: stop destroying our own soil here on Earth, and stop the huge wild animal life decline on Earth that now stands at just 39% of what it was in 1970. Life on Earth is dying! What use is Mars if Earth can barely support humans, and for how much longer for our huge population of 8+ billion.

[@ingridhohmann3523]

Good idea, you have to eat 🍽

[@VrXl17]

they probably will but they might not because we dont actually have humaniod robots that are actually good at producing food and not to mention the energy consumption

[@jamesrumsey1074]

If I can already get all the heroine, cocaine and prostitutes I want, why would I have any interest in space?

[@stevepashley795]

That was a brilliant video. Thank you, I've just subscribed.

[@dbrock420]

Don’t

[@md.faisalshah]

Waiting for that movement to see man on mars will be a great dream in human history. We are listning this since feom our childhood. Now it will be pleasant.. 😮😊

[@IzzyTheEditor]

Look no matter how many people want to go to Mars, we can terraform it all we like, but we will never be able to give it a magnetic field and deadly radiation will always be an issue. That's the biggest issue that needs to be overcome before literally anything else.

[@leefleck3598]

Finally somebody States the obvious

[@215father]

Ok the trip to Mars first humans would be sick in various ways. With out gravity, space brakes, radiation shielding, a way to land without crashing,then . Maybe in about 200 years from now when we invent artificial gravity another only work on the ship not on the planet.

[@215father]

We just barely can get folks to Earth's orbit and back. And they kinda crash in the ocean.mars has no ocean. Etc. now sending AI robots are feasible, it'll be decades before humans will be staying on the moon for a couple weeks and they might not be healthy enough to do much.

[@jamesbarnesii4124]

The Earth's magnetic field is created by its iron core. Considering you have an asteroid field Between Mars and Jupiter would it not be possible to create an external magnetic field using a number of iron asteroids placed in orbit around Mars. Obviously you would Need to place a nuclear reactor on more to create electricity. Am I correct that electricity plus iron = magnetic field

[@erichayes2890]

I AGREE!!!

[@amanac7305]

In my lifetime I want to land on Mars ❤

[@anthonyromano1014]

I like the idea of travelling to Mars😮

[@jocelynamado1351]

Awesome video!!! I really enjoyed it, thank you!

[@timellis8209]

Elon Musk said he was going to send a bunch of his robots to Mars to set everything up.

[@walterhoenig6569]

Mucks is moronic.

[@ThaiSteffe]

He also said humans will travel to Mars 2026 a couple of years ago. He talks the talk but can't walk the walk. Let's be honest. Humans will never go to Mars.

[@VrXl17]

@@ThaiSteffe if you genuinely think that you are not very smart

[@ThaiSteffe]

@@VrXl17 Sure buddie. Whatever floats your boat.

[@VrXl17]

@@ThaiSteffe tell me why you would ever think something like that. Sure Elon musk is a bit enthusiastic but as it was said in the video, we already HAVE the technology to get to mars. It’s surviving that’s the problem. Considering we know how to get oxygen and food, it’s mostly a problem of long term survival and how to get there before our bones decay from not being used. Fuel is also a problem but that can be solved by having rockets that wait along the path to mars. Then there’s the starship passing tests and inspections which it probably will by 2026. Once we solve those issues we go to mars

[@juhilla749]

Any way I look at it, it seems that the most important thing is to have an amazingly strong and safe, reliable engine that can work anywhere and anytime. What is built around this engine seems almost incidental, but of course it is not.

[@morphicresonancechannel604]

18:13 the AI always scare me with his bizzarre imperfections....

[@take5th]

Similar to the images on my lunch box…when I was 8 in 1965. Still waiting.

[@MichelAltero]

Reportage vraiment passionent merci❤

[@mariano7699]

Unexpectedly interesting😊👍

[@QuinnMallory-od1hw]

The first problem is developing a magnetic field shield which is going to need a combination of new magnetic materials and a huge amount of electrical power to work, this could protect the spacecraft as it makes the journey to Mars from solar radiation. Secondly you need another on Mars to make a base, and possibly a third massive one at a station at the Lagrange point to possibly shield Mars in the future. Alot of power and physics and technology we don't have yet.

[@deesmith6363]

The cosmic radiation problem alone means a trip to Mars is a death sentence without a Van Allen Belt type of shield along with a deflector to keep heavy, fast moving particles thrown off by CMEs from destroying any ship that might be sent on a Mars mission. The logical baby step would be a moon base.

[@angeliiique-p7s]

@@QuinnMallory-od1hw … and a lot of money that we’ll never have ,,.

[@cheeseman417]

Well, before we get to first land on Mars, we should at least first get men to the moon!.... whoops! just kidding!😂

[@wandaclark9252]

Never went to moon

[@DayTon-h9u]

Based 💯🎯👍

[@rafsan1578]

Put it mildly😂

[@entertainmentsolutions1528]

Absolutely brilliant video, great visuals & also narrating . I hope I’m alive to see this happen. ❤

[@klevis1.618]

I dont thing will happen in our generation, nasa planing to to in moon..

[@MoniqueangeliqueLumpkin]

YA RIGHT HUM! BUILD A LUNAR RESTAURANT AND COMMERCIALIZE THE 🌙.

[@mytrueself1598]

This is a nice one for Thunderf00t

[@knittingnana2939]

Confidentially declared or confidently declared?

[@Galvamel]

This was very interesting, thank you, but also it's Saturn Five not Saturn V.

[@Bigboodeeluvva]

What's the difference? 5 is 5. Maybe I'm slow...

[@Galvamel]

@@Bigboodeeluvva He was saying "Saturn Vee"

[@deejay.trader]

If someone tell you he went to Mars within 3 days on round trip, no one will believe him, except believers. Only believers trust him.

[@rashid_amx]

Look at the string holding the astronaut on the left 😂 2:36

[@spacextreme1]

Your AI prompt generation is pretty good. Almost. Pretty good

[@MagicLoveQueen]

Robots our Future is coming😊

[@brigo6465]

good idea on the rover to become a cabin overhang and create space 🤔cyp

[@skyfool981]

This opened up by mentioning Elon musk’s plans and I laughed so hard, I spit my coffee

[@suningchen]

Prepare Mars for me to go naked and run whichever direction I want, that's called colonization.

[@micr0chap]

Well done! How did you source all those fascinating animations? Care to reveal some of your trade secrets? (sub'd)

[@dalecarpenter8828]

conquer ! cracks me up !

[@rhouz8689]

8 starships / octagon base, 50 starlinks deployed, 48 bots, 4 reactors, mfg and earthing equipment with parts. This starts the 26,000sf base for the next 24 ships to arrive in about 2 years.

[@the_new_project]

That’s the spirit.

[@davidhewson8605]

RZ . How are you keeping ?. Pentagon and Musk should bugger off to Mars. Regards . Dave

[@rhouz8689]

@@davidhewson8605 Pentagons would be another great option, send 5-10 ships at a time instead of 8. I choose 8 just for the amount of sf once assembled. I think Musk might be too old but his kids can. No worries, if NASA behind it looking at least 25 years for the first human landing.

[@MarcusRobertoSouza]

😊😊❤❤i am happy,tank you, please😊😊❤❤

[@henrikibjensen3869]

I love the confidence of the AI speech. Traveling in Boeing Starliner, that will be exciting. But no problems for an AI persona 😆

[@FOV_Vortex]

Can’t wait

[@EugeneDingleBerryFan]

Something i dont understand is how come the Apollo missions were all performed months apart, yet the Artemis missions have 2-3 year gaps?

[@Mr.Smith.C.R]

I suspect that Apollo was primarily a military program disguised as a civilian program while today’s programs are civilian programs with military spinoffs.

[@Mens_Rights]

You might remember that we lost the Apollo 1 crew and almost lost the Apollo 13 crew. There were only 17 Apollo missions, including the unmanned ones. That's not a great safety record. Maybe NASA is trying to clean up its act? Also, moon shots cost money. In the 1960s, the US was in a race for national prestige with the Soviet Union, and it was doing well, economically. In 2024, the American people are wondering how they'll pay for groceries, and who are we in a race with? The government is going to be a lot more shy about spending money, because hungry people can turn into angry people in a hurry.

[@everettwalker9141]

All this is science fiction !! You show astronauts wearing spacesuits and tending to growing plant's. If a mam cant live in this space without a suit how do you expect fragile green plants to survive ? Nasa is still trying to build a spacesuit and still dont know how to stop radiation

[@jem2886]

Because they don’t want any wasted missions if you do it every few months there’s a guaranteed failure outcome which means billions of dollars wasted to be fair to your question, 50 years after you’d think we would have developed a more reliable source of travel but to answer they do it for maximum efficiency

[@Zack-cr9ic]

Exactly

[@CB_POLITICS]

By the time they get to mars , we probably done had 30 president changes 😂😂

[@channasenathommaya6193]

Really your thoughts thanks nasa.

[@Borderlands808]

I been to mars a dozen times already.

[@brianarbenz1329]

Next time you're there, bring me back some of those those delish candy bars!

[@Zack-cr9ic]

Oh, so you've traveled beyond the ice ring have you?

[@Crazyuncle1]

Finally a visionary with the resources and drive to get it done without the albatross of government to weigh him down.

[@Steveholmes1972]

Some people like challenges

[@Itsallwrongbutthatsallright]

The Moon and Mars are the only places in our solar system where human landing is possible. Then there are lots of moons elsewhere but they are far away and some are in radiation belts etc. So moon first, then Mars. We must prepare ourselves to leave our solar system, for the human race to survive, when the sun expands and burns everything away. Moon- and Mars missions are just 'practice' for interstellar travel IE move to another solar system to survive. We've got about half to a billion years until the sun start dying and expanding. If the we don't destroy the Earth ourselves before hand, that is !

[@pewterhacker]

Great video! I appreciate KZbinrs who do their research and only discuss approaches that are credible.

[@blair2480]

This is happening sooner than we think

[@cody7790]

First like and comment 😊

[@jacobtravers1961]

You’re what’s wrong with the world go read a book

[@rocoe9019]

Wow! Something exciting for you to talk about in preschool!

[@AndSan-n7q]

Well at least now we now know who 💩​ in the buckwheat@@rocoe9019

[@Stellarlife]

Yup just like how you would climbing the mountain ⛰️

[@ercieyyy]

There are some advanced technologies utilising the solid oxide from Martian atmosphere to generate oxygen through electrolysis or ionic liquid extraction in Mars. However there are more important things that cannot allow the first ever human landing on Mars' surface. For example, Mars has harsh environmental conditions such as a very thin atmosphere, insufficient sunshine and gravity, extremely temperature variations. Therefore, sending the people with regardless of every single issue of Mars can cause the adverse effects to the humans psychological and biological states.

[@jorgesolis7891]

What dreams might became...🎉

[@JatinderSingh-k6y]

Firstly humans should value life on planet earth

[@ThomasDillon-z6u]

If you value Earth so much you should set up mining and manufacturing in space well away from Earth. If we would work cooperatively on that. Earth would be lush and green like you wouldn't believe. It's not going to happen. We are too much of a predatory warrior species. We'll squabble over limited resources until we nuke ourselves off of the face of the planet.

[@YFLTheGreat]

Mars was once a planet like earth

[@daviddean707]

Here we go again

[@dentonfender6492]

Yes! I will believe it when the USA stops wasting our money on the military industrial complex, and foreign aid that benefits mostly Wall Street, and spend it on all the American people.

[@CondeNastCruiser]

Earth would benefit from a mars mission. There are enough ppl to do both

[@street_omoba_tv]

I wish to go to Mars

[@saiedukamara7543]

I want to witness

[@lilbrained11]

Let's study hard, who knows we'll be the first humans on mars!!

[@lukeframpton3671]

They can't even get down to the titanic yet let's alone get you to Mars and the battery won't last 😂😂

[@nellyjohnson7316]

There has to be a fleet of supply ships of all the things required to set up a viable colony.

[@arthurgroncki8993]

Don’t worry India is now in the space race will have a 7/11 on mars or halfway in no time!

[@nellyjohnson7316]

@@arthurgroncki8993 💀☠️

[@auntonaustin462]

They go need a starship with a farm to stand a chance there’s no way they go stock 6months of food and make it. After they get to mars they go need. Foods too it’s too risky and not worth the hassle

[@JLKeener77]

Even if astronauts are able to someday complete the dangerous voyage to Mars, we are hundreds or thousands of years away from colonizing the Red Planet. Frankly, I don’t even really see the point of trying to colonize a planet that is so, so far away and so severely inhospitable to human life. Life on Mars would truly be a hellish experience us earthlings.

[@romanlutseiko7633]

Noway!! I think at least 2100!

[@DrDabb47]

2026 is getting close. The only way that could happen is if Mars exploration was vital to human survival in the close future. Plus their is a Short cut window that Mars and Earth are closest and is optimum to lessen the amount of radiation the humans get.

[@edgardorosso5991]

¡¡¡WITH ISS TO MARS, UOUU!!!

[@PepaFischer]

You are brilliant GENIUS…….2026 you are a MARS….GOD GIVE YOU OPEN DOORS…VICTORY..IS YOURS ELON…BE BLESST❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@ΚυριακηΚαπιωτη]

❤!!! !!! !!!

[@IMiss_OnlYours]

The closed caption said "snail paste" instead of "snail paced". 😂😂😂😂

[@charlesjohns9722]

If we go by the newest happening we will be on Mars by 2100 and that is just to start putting the first stage of the Mars exploration in to a possible reality.

[@mr.shadestrains6033]

I think we need a base on the moon And head out from there

[@the_new_project]

We need a Starship and quantum communications.

[@rollvideo]

Dear Jason Statham: Why are you producing videos for KZbin? Haven’t you made enough money being a movie star?

[@jvaldez1896]

I think the ISS is the natural first stage, we need a few more ISS in between with resources like fuel and enegy for precautionary reasons.

[@389293912]

If we have a moon base we can build a magnetic launch rail to accelerate unlimited payloads to mars (food, fuel, supplies of all sorts). Send robots ahead to build a city underground. Badabing Mars colony.

[@BelhajKhalid-k5r]

Khalid35❤❤❤

[@ивангареев-и5ю]

After a day in outer space, a person begins to experience terrible headaches😐 A person cannot exist without gravity, therefore, the International Space Station is in a certain orbit and this is the main problem of all flights anywhere in space.

[@jimstafford9409]

This "plan' is so absurdly complicated as to guarantee failure and/or cancelation. As the technology advances actual Mars exploration and colonization will be greatly simplified. Of note is that this piece almost totally ignores the Space X current intention to have several uncrewed Starships (presumably carrying supplies for later crewed missions). leaving for Mars in two years with crewed flight intended for 2 or 4 years after that. Nuclear rockets currently under development eventually should greatly reduce transit times.

[@hamster_knight]

Can he do it?

[@vi8tboy-fk6ix]

We are still a type 0.75 civilization soooo forget about going to Mars!

[@homesweethomepainting3524]

Don’t mess the moon up or the relationship between the moon and earth

[@Just1heyU]

No doubt, immensely complex and extremely difficult but can be done with a well thought out plain; to get you there and back in one piece.

[@WesBeres-o5t]

Apakah saya harus membuat bangunan dengan mengambil pasir dari negeri seberang ? Perlu ketangkasan

[@MerudonWoW]

I don’t think we will have too many humans go to mars. There’s nothing really there for us. The moon definitely seems more realistic

[@linyenchin6773]

3:37 "It would comfortably take you about half an hour" - !?... To walk 1 kilometre and back? That's moving at 4 kph, most city folk walk at roughly twice that speed, the speed walkers can maintain 10 or 12, depending on individual stride length. Even if you used 10 whole minutes selecting and paying for your items, it shouldn't be more than 20 minutes used. I would say it is 12 to 15 minutes and 20 if there is a lineup at the checkout, it isn't "comfortable" but lazy to waste a full 30 minutes in visiting a store that is 1 kilometre away.

[@KerimaneMurtezi-u7d]

I'll mio bell Cervellone, ci riuscira 🚀❤️‍🔥❤️💜🕊🫂🥰

[@HarryOttele]

Here is How we get to Mars. First 3 Missions will be will be cluster of 10 to 18 StarShips. Be now the Nuclear engine Tug will be in operation. A StarShip Satellite Transport type man ship about 1000 ft across for gravity and 8-10 crew. With 4 Legs and 4 - 8 HABs on each end of 400 - 500ft x 4m tubes and 4 Transport Ships for 25 + 2 crew and 4 Cargo Ships. The total Pax will be 100 and 16 StarShip 4 HAB transport & 4 Supply. HAB/HLS other HABs and Supply will be in the mission 2 and 3. This can be built and cut the Pax to 50 but the crew will be the same. With the Nuclear Tug the SST can return to Earth for upgrades and new mission. As the first SST is on it way to Mars a SST-2 will be built. This craft will transport a full 100 Pax . Clustering ship together is the only way to get people and supplies to MARS.

[@Zack-cr9ic]

🎶 Space may be the final frontier but it's made in a Hollywood basement 🎶-Red Hot Chili Peppers 🌶️

[@DevanNadha-l1z]

Fokus misi membangun stasiun luar angkasa di bulan saja dulu. Jika sudah berhasil membangun stasiun luar angkasa di bulan, setelah itu baru ke planet mars.

[@ETHANALLEN-x4u]

The end of the day men are from mars and women from Venus

[@pippipster6767]

Mission will be headed by Captain Bow Larks.

[@CPaimon]

Sign me up button 🖖🏾

[@kungufupela]

siendo realistas, no menos de 100 años para empezar a tener todo lo necesario para dicha aventura. velocidad, energia y víveres redundantes para hacer el viaje seguro. Se puede empezar mañana si se quiere.

[@petepeterson4540]

politics is the main reason why we are not there on mars Elon Musk is our last hope no politics.

[@uavvidography2760]

Nah

[@lilbrained11]

I wish it'll all be done till 2070, i don't think i'm gonna live after 2070

[@TheMoneypresident]

Phobos is a much safer station. Can tunnel in for protection. Has some gravity.

[@DanielRodriguez-bn6mg]

Not in my life time will I ever see a human step foot on mars. I’m 52 years old and I’m running out of time so hurry up! 😊😊😊

[@PaulWright-kw5cm]

I'm 58 yrs old. So, I know where you're coming from. I was 3 yrs old when men landed on the moon. My father asked my mother to get me up out of bed; so I could see it. I didn't understand it. I barely remember looking at a blurry video of a man hopping around on the surface of a plain somewhere. Of course, I had no concept that it was the surface of another planet. I hope to live long enough to see the first humans reach the Red Planet. If I did not have two stints put in my heart, a little over two years ago, it most definitely would not have happened. Maybe I have another 10 to 12 years left. During that time, maybe I can witness a return voyage to the moon; and a mission to Mars.

[@t.b.a.r.r.o.]

Mars will be there when humans are up to going. Meantime relax, and enjoy the StarShip developments!

[@PascalPaid]

As Tesla continues to push boundaries, Optimus is poised to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of space exploration. With its innovative technology and AI-driven capabilities, Optimus will help humanity: Explore new frontiers Advance scientific knowledge Expand our understanding of the universe Secure a brighter future among the stars Stay tuned for updates on Tesla's Optimus and the exciting possibilities emerging from this groundbreaking technology.

[@scriptles]

With everything that is going on in space the future is going to be interesting. I have heard of plans to put solar in space and then beam down the power which I don't know would really work that well with todays tech but with microsoft putting a data center in the sea and it working I think that data centers in space might be interesting. Satellite internet is very promising too. I think we could see a huge shift in technology over the next 20 years.