Star Trails- Southern VS Northern Hemisphere🌟Comparison;4 CARDINAL DIRECTIONS-Like in Mirror

[@SerbianConspiracy]

more astronomy : STARS through Telescope: Arcturus,Procyon; kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5fNlJSApbKKr8U&lc=z12wjbpxwk31xtklt23whf2p2vrysnpt0.1499596192458699 NEW video:STARS: Sirius,VENUS, Capella,Vega,Canopus, Aldebaran kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZuqZXywd9B5gKs STAR SIRIUS🌟MIND BLOWING TELESCOP FOOTAGE -kzbin.info/www/bejne/kIm3mql3ed6onNE Star Trails- Southern VS Northern Hemisphere🌟Comparison;4 CARDINAL DIRECTIONS-kzbin.info/www/bejne/oaa0qIWwhqqdecU Simultaneously Recorded MOON🌙 Southern-Northern "Hemisphere"!!FLIPPED MOON IMAGE;Opposite directions kzbin.info/www/bejne/gZ28m2utlrmfabM

[@gameoforbits3783]

I'm surprised that you went through all this effort but failed to compare the most important images, south hemisphere facing south (clockwise rotation) and north hemisphere facing north (ccw), where the opposite rotation of the two poles is made evident. It's the right footage edited in a less than ideal way. Anyway you proved the rotation of the globe. This and the fact that the stars we see are different from each position are great evidence of the globe. thanks.

[@infinityfitSpokane]

Conspiracy TV simple to prove if it’s mirrored, flip the image and all the stars should be the same as in the north right?

[@gameoforbits3783]

@@adeuk777 nah seriously

[@alainrobillard4300]

@@gameoforbits3783 At 2:12, I think it is the footage that you were waiting for

[@gameoforbits3783]

@@alainrobillard4300 all this footage confirms Earth's rotation and it's direction

Tried to prove the Earth is flat and accidentally proved it's a sphere. Hilarious!

[@MarcusYangNilsson]

Or a very clever guy - because FE:ers will end up here and use it as an argument until they realize... wait a minute...

[@zenithabcdeadlock8474]

Ron McCaffrey - Quite the opposite it's proved there is no movement around a star. Where is the lateral movement from an object travelling 66,000 miles an hour .... ? The stars should look like a timelapse of a frown. If it were a Globe with movement .... don't believe me ..... get some pens stand still and draw a rotation... Now do it on the move as the earth is meant to be ... what's that .. YOU CANT. HMMM . Well there's a surprise.

[@karce1981]

Here's an experiment for you... if you know anyone around the world, preferably Australia and Iceland, for example, or New Zealand and Canada, or Russia and Argentina, etc (one northern country, and one southern country)... ask them to take a slow shutter (long exposure) image of a clear night's sky, person in southern country takes a picture of the southern sky, and the northern country takes a picture of the northern sky... get them to have a slow enough exposure that it can capture the movement of the stars (perhaps a 5-10 minute exposure length). Then compare the two. Also note that BOTH are pointing upwards to the night sky in their respective countries. After you've looked at that, go to public park that has a playground. Hopefully it'll have one of those sit-and-spins, you know, the big ones that 4-8 people can sit on while it spins around... Slowly spin it and stand on it. While you're spinning. look up at the sky... You'll see the sky spinning. Then look down to your feet, you won't see the ground, instead you'll see the floor of the sit-and-spin because you're standing on it. In order to replicate the photographs, you would have to be underneath the sit-and-spin to see the actual ground move, where the perception of rotation is opposite. If you can prove to me that the stars go the same way in both Iceland (facing north sky) and Argentina (facing south sky), then you have convinced me the earth is flat.

[@GarrettFogerlie]

karce1981 I don’t think your sit & spin idea makes sense. Think of it with a see through base, as you look from the sky down to the ground then to the edge of the spinning thing (you’re facing away from center,) the ground would be spinning the same way when you look through it; if it was perfectly see through you wouldn’t know for sure where its edge is. Perhaps you meant if you stood on the bottom with you feet on the spinning thing and your head close to the ground. Even then, the spin would appear the same depending what way you’re facing. Nevertheless I don’t know how your example was supposed to help anything, especially since you just said you’re looking upward. If you’re in the south facing north and look up, the stars would make a smile type of motion. However if you face south (still in the south,) they would make a frown. If you’re in the north, facing south they would make a frown too; but if you faced north they would make a smile. Your question/example just seems convoluted (as I’m sure my reply does,) nevertheless there are numerous examples that prove that the earth cannot be flat. The motion of the southern stars viewed from the Southern Hemisphere is a great one since south on a flat earth is away from north so there are an almost limitless “souths” that face different directions yet we see the same stars and behavior when viewed from these locations.

[@zenithabcdeadlock8474]

@@karce1981 -- you do know all you have to do is turn around dont you ... even if you were in the north & the luminaries/stars were coming from your right all you need do is turn around then hey presto there coming from your left. A better proof would be vid the sun say from england & vid it also from the Fawklands and see if there's any difference in speed. That would be a flat plain proof.

[@roberts5539]

compare the central rotation (axis) points. North 1:14 Arizona USA, south 2:04 NSW Australia. The north one has a central str- Polaris. No Polaris in the southern axis point. therefore NOT a mirror, but a different set of stars. in a single frame, each star can be identified by the names and constellations people have given them over the years- different stars.

[@LamirLakantry]

A perfect illustration of how the world can't be flat.

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpfJlqmrbZ18Zq8 whatch this one

[@LamirLakantry]

@@erickedmondromanharris1549 ​ He keeps saying perspective, yet seems to have no understanding about perspective. And at 2:24 he shows an illustration of how a dome would show two curves like that, while ignoring all the other problems that illustration gives his flat earth idea. Here are three obvious huge flaws: 1. According to the illustration, the northern star must be near the edge of the flat earth, yet when you stand near the northern pole, the northern star appears to be almost directly up. 2. According to the illustration, the southern pole stars can not be visible from anywhere, yet clearly they are. 3. According to the illustration, the southern stars can only be seen south of one side of the flat earth at a time. Yet in reality, people can see the same southern stars to the south from South-Africa, South-America and Australia at the same time. This is the problem when you create an add hawk explanation. It only explains one single aspect of a phenomena. As soon as you consider the other aspects of it, it falls apart. As for the glass bowl thing, no that's not how refraction works. It's difficult to explain exactly why he's got this add hawk explanation so wrong without being able to illustrate it for you, but like the previous example, this excuse falls apart as soon as you test it in any way. For example, the bowl idea should only create one curving pattern, not two. Also, this explanation directly contradicts the previous explanation. And then for the duplicate image in a curved mirror. Where do I even begin. The sky's a mirror now? What? And if this is the case, why can't we see the same stars duplicated from various points on earth? And this warped mirror sky idea again directly contradicts the previous two explanations. I don't know how a person can find any of these explanations satisfying.

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

@@LamirLakantry some people are gonna have a hard time waking up from the lies.

[@doocheit]

Erick Edmond Roman Harris Haha. What lies? Yall say to use your senses and evidence and all that, this is clear evidence while yalls "proof" is some jacked up theories.

[@zakwanberlin]

@@erickedmondromanharris1549 I know this is a 2 year old comment, but there’s no reason to lie doofus. If anything flat earthers are lying. Even if y’all were to be sent up into space and see Earth with your own eyes, y’all will still try to find some reason to claim a flat earth. Lying about Earth’s shape is so trivial, what’s the reason??? And don’t say to hide God because you all are trying to undermine God’s power.

[@simonegroggia3241]

Great video. Just one simple brilliant evidence that the earth is a globe.

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpfJlqmrbZ18Zq8 watch this one

[@matsumoku1]

it isn't

[@mh7008]

Proves that the celestial sphere moves and not the earth, and that it is within the earth as Gods Word says it is. Knowest thou THE ORDINANCES OF HEAVEN? CANST THOU SET THE DOMINION THEREOF IN THE EARTH? 2 And the Lord said unto Satan, From whence comest thou? And Satan answered the Lord, and said, FROM GOING TO AND FRO IN THE EARTH, AND FROM WALKING UP AND DOWN IN IT. And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great IN THE EARTH, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. To fetch about this form of speech hath thy servant Joab done this thing: and my lord is wise, according to the wisdom of an angel of God, to know all things that are IN THE EARTH. Thine, O LORD, is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is IN THE HEAVEN AND IN THE EARTH is thine; thine is the kingdom, O LORD, and thou art exalted as head above all. And said, O LORD God of Israel, there is no God like thee IN THE HEAVEN, nor IN THE EARTH; which keepest Though the root thereof wax old IN THE EARTH, and the stock thereof die in the ground; etc etc etc

[@mh7008]

@Matthew Morycinski I dont think you want the answer because it is obvious that if the celestial sphere rotates within a concave earth it will be going in opposite directions at each pole

[@jalandub]

Margs oh he wants the answer, you just can't give it. Because a flat earth under a dome can't have two poles rotating opposite! Impossible. You can provide no model where a celestial sphere will show what is actually observed in both hemispheres at night

[@sks-nz6mz]

where can i find equator star trails?

[@adunknowng]

Yeah that would look great just looking straight up, I think the Star trails would be straight lines.

[@whogivesashitization]

OP , thank you for this video . I liked and subscribed , which is extremely rare for me . A small token of my large appreciation

[@SerbianConspiracy]

Thank you

[@xBaphometHx]

Thanks for proving Earth's rotation.

[@babylonsfall9852]

xBaphometHx for me it just prove the opposite

[@babylonsfall9852]

The space around is moving not earth

[@connellyjohnson145]

That doesn't make sense if it was moving around us then both directions would be the same when looking in the same direction

[@xBaphometHx]

Pixel Punch nope, because if you are standing on a sphere you see the opposite spin depending on where you are standing at.

[@xBaphometHx]

bo dnb nope. It proves we move.

[@ranwiz3327]

The 'polar' views most telling - only possible explanation for different rotational movement is GLOBE. Draw a diagram. Stop the BS.

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

Dome effect and water. Check out experiment, inverse water.

[@gameoforbits3783]

@@erickedmondromanharris1549 the atmosphere is made of air, not water

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

@@gameoforbits3783 stars are not in the atmosphere, rhey are notnin SAPCEA either, they are in water. Research Flat Earth

[@gameoforbits3783]

@@erickedmondromanharris1549 _"they are in water"_ any astronomer you can quote who says that thing?

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

@@gameoforbits3783 yes, any astronemer can do as he pleases, you believe in Nasa, so that's what pleases you. Search for a youtube video called "stars are not what you think" it's not even 10 minutes long.

[@aussierose9015]

I had a Australian flat earthers tell me that the stars prove its flat because of Polaris and I asked her when did she ever see Polaris in Australia and she asked what I meant 😂 told her to stop watching the stars on KZbin and go look outside and try and find Polaris for me lol won't find it where we live lol

[@logic.and.reasoning]

Spot on

[@mamaboocee]

Just beautiful what you did here! I love astronomy, and am sick of the 'flat earth ' conspiracy youtubers. Let's see them explain this!!!

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpfJlqmrbZ18Zq8 watch this one

[@cobrazax]

@@erickedmondromanharris1549 kzbin.info/www/bejne/qaaQl6Clj7qefJo&ab_channel=ProfessorDaveExplains

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

@@cobrazax kzbin.info/www/bejne/pZm0i3igbritd6c

[@cobrazax]

@@erickedmondromanharris1549 U cant even show the true size of the sun as u never use filters. If that is so hard for u...watch the moon instead. It doesnt ever get smaller closer to the horizon

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

@@cobrazax it actually gets larger when closer to the horizon due to the lensing effect of atmospheric water vapor.

[@dallassegno]

Oh I get it. The reason this proves we aren't moving is because the stars are always where they are. Literally always. The earth, whatever the shape is, isn't moving through space. Even if the stars themselves were moving ever so slowly, the earth is fixed. Well done.

[@RP12ification]

Is the Ocean Pacific been surveyed and mapped out accurately or not? Who do we believe?

[@eduardopilotos9529]

I see that in the video taken from Australia, when looking North, the stars trail is CounterClockwise (for me is the opposite of the expected movement), and when looking to the East, West and South, the stars trail is Clockwise (as expected). In the video taken from Arizona, the stars trail is Clockwise, when looking South (for me is the opposite of the expected movement) and CounterClockwise when looking to the Esat, West, and North (as expected). It would be very interesting to take two videos of all the sky with a wide angle lens camera to cover 180 degrees of the sky: One video from the North Hemisphere and another one from the South Hemisfere.

[@anthonyperron6741]

This makes me want to see what the stars were doing directly above, and at 45* angles.

[@brownsnake0400]

If you were in an open enough area, you would see towards the north the stars "travel" c.clockwise and to the south they would travel Clockwise. The stars overhead would "travel" east to west from one horizon to the next. The view at 45° wouldn't be any different, would just matter which direction is being observed overall between north and south. Along the equator, looking on a 45° angle upwards and towards the east you would see the stars spread out over from the horizon overhead and then taper back into the horizon to the west.

[@billysanchez6890]

I love this video. Now I have a video to reference people to. Thanks for your hard work. 👍🏾

[@SerbianConspiracy]

Thank you for being interested in this :)

[@EricSepulveda]

Why is it the stars rotate different diredtions andbwhen facing SE,.for example, you can see both of these directions??

[@logic.and.reasoning]

At the equator the trails are straight overhead. Looking north or south from the equator the trails curve, until they reach their celestial poles. Hence, looking south they rotate as the sun does, low on the horizon looking south it is left to right/east to west. Looking north they go east to west, but it I right to left. Globe fact

[@movieklump]

I've been to Antarctica and experienced 24 hour days. Stick that up your flat earth.

[@CrazyPets0]

@Themore Youno you can go in Antarctica...5.000 dollars..idiot. you don't have money probably, that's another story

[@michapap]

@@CrazyPets0 did you go there alone ..did they left you to go everywre you wanted?? No.....

[@TheAndnor]

@@michapap does it matter? You will still experience 24h daylight, so who cares if its on a guided tour?

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

There is no 24 hours of day in South. Not in any country either, if there were in a South Pole a 24 hour sun day then there would in argentina and chile as well as new zeland and australia. It doesn't happen. It's a hoax.

[@victortsuchino8740]

​@@erickedmondromanharris1549 You would need to go further south to experience 24 hours of daylight in the southern hemisphere. You can only experience 24 hours of daylight once you pass 66.5 degree of longitude EITHER SOUTH OR NORTH. The southern tip of South America is the closest but still only at roughly 57 degrees South. Antarctica is the only place in the southern hemisphere where you can experience 24 hours of daylight. I know you are probably afraid to try to journey to Antarctica cause its "really an ice wall that the government protects" or some dumb shit like that. But it does prove that earth must be a globe and not flat.

[@ebot1000]

This is because you are looking in opposite directions. In each video, you are looking at the opposite circumpolar stars which have different constellations, nebulas, and galaxies. This phenomena further proves that we are on a sphere and it is spinning.

[@DornAlien123]

Yup. Simple geomety and perfect understanding of objective observation in relation to an axis.

[@alejandrojavier9214]

am I the only one that see both hemispheres going clockwise ?

[@brownsnake0400]

Looking west: Arizona: C.Clockwise NSW: Clockwise Looking east: Arizona: C.Clockwise NSW: Clockwise Looking north: Arizona: C.Clockwise NSW: C.Clockwise This is because you are observing along the axis of rotation. Looking south: Arizona: Clockwise NSW: Clockwise Again, because it's being observed along axis of rotation.

[@rocky26522]

Congratulations, you've debunked Flat Earth.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

lol. I only posted a truth.....

[@redpilledarmy2391]

Serbian Conspiracy wait, you're a flat earther and you think this helps your case?

[@AllahYa3tikeFatna]

what a dumbass hahaha they think this video is in the case of flatearthers and they dont know is the confirmation of a glob this proof wht a level of IQ the flatearther have

[@HelloThere-pg4yk]

when i hear a flat earther trying to explain basically anything for reason im reminded of this clip. kzbin.info/www/bejne/hYvIeaRtf56Ufq8

[@ryanb1874]

not if the aether is moving opposite, starting at the point of circular area, divide into to centralised sections, with even area. diameter times sin 45 gives the halfway, area diameter.

[@nullises9697]

This destroy totally all flat earth bullshit

[@babylonsfall9852]

So if earth is a globe rotating 1066mph around Sun why the Stars match always in a perfect Circled line pls answer me i not understand

[@MarcusYangNilsson]

But if earth was NOT moving... then you would see the same sky all the time? ALL THE TIME.

[@massimookissed1023]

Because the stars are a very very long way away. In 6 months we move 186 million miles from one side of the sun to the other. The nearest stars are 25 million million miles away.

[@collinweeks6322]

​@MarcusYangNilsson the stars move the earth does not.

[@brownsnake0400]

​@collinweeks6322 wrong but you'll deny anything that proves you wrong anyways.

[@PhoenixAurelius-138]

​@@brownsnake0400 the sky is moving, not the earth. We are in a containment field and the sky is a holography. No one has ever gone beyond the dome or Dyson shell or whatever barrier there is, therefore, no one has a clue what shape the earth is. All globe pictures of the earth are CGI (prove me wrong). We've had 80 years of "space travel" and not a single raw photo of the globe exists. Why? All the international space station people have to do (if there is such a place) is turn around and take a photo. That alone would discredit all FE arguments. But... That's never happened.

[@samdekat]

Synopsis: The stars in the sky look exactly as we would expect on a rotating globe. Flat Earthers can't explain the southern stars based on their model.

[@eve_avery]

Based on their model they can barely prove southerners exist.

[@truther33]

It's not rotating. It's not flat and it's not a heliocentric flawed model. It's concave and we're inside

[@Bartron_Flat_Earth]

​@@eve_avery Stop lying 😅

[@Bartron_Flat_Earth]

@samdekat No, don't lie to yourself, or buy a brain 😅

[@reallycooluleh]

Who else is here to prove flat earthers wrong. Great video, thank you for making it!

[@holysecret1]

This is Evidence that the Earth is Flat. Watch the Video Closely. When observing the northern sky, the star's diurnal motion appears counterclockwise both in Arizona and in Australia. When observing the southern sky, the star's diurnal motion appears clockwise in both Arizona and Australia. When observing the western sky, the western sky of Arizona is equivalent to the eastern sky of Australia, making the star's motion appear opposite. The same applies when observing the eastern sky. If the Earth were spherical, the star's diurnal motion in Australia would always be observed as clockwise, and in Arizona, it would always be observed as counterclockwise. However, the time-lapse video does not show this pattern. Conclusion: This provides strong evidence that the stars are rotating within a dome over a flat, disc-shaped Earth.

[@holysecret1]

I’ve spent hours carefully watching the video multiple times, and when I compare the Arizona footage with the Australia footage, why don't the leaves move at all? This makes me suspect that the video might be manipulated.

[@LautaroJaguar]

this video documents perhaps the most unexplainable thing of nature for a flat earth model, and that's the southern celestial pole that can be seen from anywhere south of the Equator, unlike Polaris by the way. Flat Earth does not hold to basic astronomical observation.

[@matsumoku1]

Explaining what the sky does is different from the shape of the earth. If you try to use the sky to prove the shape of the earth, you lose. Just like we learn in school that boats go out of view because of the curve. Total lie. The sky is not our domain and is fundamentally unexplainable.

[@markrose9957]

Can one see the change when they leave the Northen Hemisphere to reach the Southern? Can the reversal be observed at the time it reverses?

[@SerbianConspiracy]

how you would do it? in plane?

[@LVMorpheus]

@@SerbianConspiracy : they don't leave the hemisphere. It's a different set of stars visible in the Northern and Southern hemisphere. At the equator, they appear to move directly across the sky... no circle.

[@ophirdog]

This only shows that the Earth is a sphere.

[@SpottedSharks]

Thanks for proving a globe.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

yw

[@kaydenka1]

As an Australian, I feel privileged to see such a beautiful view of the Milky Way.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

and also directions are correct

[@zenithabcdeadlock8474]

Just like to point out that if the earth was turning, you should see a lateral / horizontal time lapse due to earth's movement around the star ... that is 2 distinct movements not just rotation. Don't forget it's supposed to move at 66'000 miles an hour, during an 8 hour night that is 528'000 miles, that is 66.6 Earth's side by side. That it has to traverse and not just turn in a circle. Yet nothing you should have a horizontal timelapse sad face from the stars not a circle. It's showing you all that the Heliocentric model is wrong. Don't forget it's a fixed camera people.

[@Jo_Kuiper]

Why do you ignore the fact that the stars are also moving in the same direction and relative speed as the earth does around the center of our galaxy, and the fact they are light years far away from us?

[@dominotruth]

@jo kuiper you answered your own question 3 years ago. If the stars were moving at a similar rate of speed as the earth, we wouldn’t see any star trails. And if the earth was really moving as fast as “they” say, do you really think the stars would be in the same positions they were in 1000s if years ago? The heliocentric model is ballix. The earth is stationary.

[@certainpointofview3860]

@@dominotruth hey I I don’t believe in the heliocentric model, I’ve studied the flat earth model quite extensively. One of the reasons I’m on this video. How does the flat earth model explain the souther stars.? In every model I only see the northern ones

[@isaiahdanielvlog]

@@certainpointofview3860it’s simple. The model can’t explain it because it doesn’t work

[@LVMorpheus]

@@dominotruth : The stars are not precisely in the same position they were in 20K years ago... but the difference is just a few degrees. The distances we are from these stars is vast. It takes 4 years for light from the nearest star to reach us. It would take 100's of thousands of years to start noticing a significant change in the position of most stars. The star trails we see are not due to the motions of the stars. It is due to the rotation of the Earth. 1 light year is 6 trillion miles. The diameter of Earth's orbit around the sun is under 200 million miles. Most stars are 10 trillion to 80 trillion miles away. The motion of the Earth is barely a blip in the scale of things.

[@he7is7at7hand]

Thank you so much for this video. This has got to be the coolest video on youtube. This proves that the Earth is a globe. It's simply amazing! And the night sky is amazing. God's creation is amazing! Thank you so much!

[@seansmith6380]

What if you were standing at the exact location as these cameras and looked in the opposite direction would the stars change direction?

[@SerbianConspiracy]

@@seansmith6380 point of video is that alll directions are recorded, from australia and north america and compared. fact that you ask such a question, only proves that you didnt say video .

[@SerbianConspiracy]

Thank you, depending where you live, you can also check validity of video , by wathing sky.

[@chadwhite5520]

Are you using globe north ,East, sount and west? Or flat earth north east south and west?

[@SerbianConspiracy]

what is the difference?

[@abroskey7]

Wow! Flat earth debunked in 2:36 minutes.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

ae model is debunked .....see this list kzbin.info/aero/PLhNVlVOFtFFmzWm0uJSCBXzo2RPeSNHoQ

[@erickedmondromanharris1549]

Dome plus water effect, check out experiment, invers water.

[@matsumoku1]

@@SerbianConspiracy It is not debunked. Globe earthers can't explain why the southern hemisphere is so much bigger than the notherm. You can't even explain phenomenon on earth let alone how the sky works. The sky is unknowable to us.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

@@matsumoku1 I said ae model is debunked

[@drzonnked8923]

So if the Earth is a globe, what need is there to warp the frame?

[@eve_avery]

To see all the stars in one direction at once.

[@brownsnake0400]

The lense is a fisheye lense to that the whole sky can be viewed without the need for multiple cameras or video splicing.

[@capoman1]

So how does FE explain this phenomenon? Or do you propose that the earth is not spinning?

[@collinweeks6322]

No flat eaether believes the earth is moving. They think the stars move.

[@PhoenixAurelius-138]

The SKY is spinning. The rotation of the Holo sphere around a central axis.

[@lionliing.gamedev]

The opposite directions of both sides are very interesting. In my very low science knowledge I feel like the directions on nothern facing north and southern facing the south would be same on the globe. I like to know why

[@SerbianConspiracy]

it actualy fits on globe model

[@ikmkz]

How it fits on the globe?

[@kalinwellmein]

I was expecting this too, but we both were wrong.. take your phone, turn camera on, look up and start rotating whatever side you want, then look down rotating the same direction, you will see that images from up and down rotate opposite directions

[@anthonyperron6741]

Exactly. Do it with a globe to make it easiest. Rotate it west to east and stare at the north pole. Notice that it is spinning counter-clockwise. Now continue rotating the globe from west to east but stare at the south pole. Notice how it's now rotating clockwise... Also notice how, because the earth is rotating from west to east, the apparent motion of the stars is to go from east to west. It all makes perfect sense on the globe model. The FE model contends that the Zillion stars in the sky are all miraculously locked together, completing concentric circles of various sizes every 24 hours and never changing constellation.

[@thephaneron3676]

The reason for the "mirror image" effect is simple; both long exposure POV's are looking north and south, respectively, yet the stars across both hemispheres still move along an *east to west* orientation! Derp. The very fact that *lines of longitude* in the southern skies *converge* in on a celestial pivot point (directly above the south terrestrial pole), as opposed to *diverging* radially out in a horizontal, omnidirectional clusterfuck smeared all over the 360 degree panorama proves earth's rotundity beyond all shadow of a doubt. Furthermore, the altitude of the south celestial pole from the horizon (and thus it's degrees from the local zenith) corresponds perfectly with the observer's *latitude.* The sky is a *celestial sphere* that can ONLY be accurately translated into a *star globe...* NOT a star "dome." Lmao!!

[@michaeld2958]

Thank you for proving the Earth is spheroidal. This can only happen if it is spheroidal.

[@slamdunk6170]

There are 2 different systems of stars, yep,, Film the stars at the equator looking straight up and you'll see,,its worth the trip and truly amazing if you film it in timelapse

[@logic.and.reasoning]

No. One set of stars, viewed from a rotating sphere

[@isaiahdanielvlog]

I want to see an ex flat earther to actually come here and admit they’ve been bamboozled

[@logic.and.reasoning]

Watch FTFE, MCToon, and the ex flerfs are Rachie00000 and Ranty. Soon to be Jeranism and all other flerfs because of "the final experiment". Che k these channels

[@whogivesashitization]

Das me. Today I considered this approach and am delighted in this observation. After many hours of studying different proofs, I have learned a lot about our planet. I was more leaning towards flat earth for a long time but this brought me all the way back. Excellent video, thank you to the people who took time to record these star rotations

[@logic.and.reasoning]

@isaiahdanielvlog a few have. MANY more will soon have too. Many more will continue to be silly childish deniers. "Truth seekers" are very rare I flerfism.

[@jefferykeown7448]

Why are there winter and summer constellations in this flat earth model?

[@truewrldseeker4004]

If you compare the footage of looking north to looking south in Australia, there is something strange about the movement of the stars. It looks impossible the two different archs they are making, there is something not honest about your footage. The arch the stars are making looking north do not match the arch the stars are making looking south in Australia, what funny business are you doing here?

[@massimookissed1023]

truewrldseeker , maybe it's because you can't see the North celestial pole from Australia...

[@jalandub]

Wow you're trying to twist a globe proof to somehow argue for a flat earth? Very bold haha. Flerfers never give up

[@VIBESOFCOSMOS]

it is exactly flat... The west direction in flat earth for these two places is in the opposite. Where you look the sky in Australia west, the same direction on the sky for America is... east... Look at a flat earth map! All are correct !

[@damian5825]

It does not matter where you look, there can not be both clockwise and counterclockwise rotation on a flat earth. Much less around two distinct fixed points.

[@50Pluskeepactive]

To everyone living in the northern hemisphere, this is what we see in the southern hemisphere, stars rotating around the south pole. Satellite's, plane's at flight according to thier flight plan. If you had reson to investigate deeper. Southern lights following a solar wind burst. That was seen easily from the north island Auckland. There is no reason to have delusional issues here in the South. I am about to do star trails hopefully I will get a chance when down in south island.

[@altekomadero7051]

Gopro south gives a good affect

[@terraplena6457]

Excellent job....

[@2163mrjeff]

You know for a group of people that I absolutely despises the fisheye lense I sure do see a lot of it here...

[@_zproxy]

we need to be looking for 360 videos, as they show how the sky rotates. a 2D camera always distorts it

[@SerbianConspiracy]

Yes this was fish eye lense but it shows direction of moving stars. Same as moon

[@needtoknow204]

So does this mean that the earth is flat or globe??

[@chd2614]

needtoknow204 there is NO MEASURABLE CURVE...ANYWHERE..it's flat

[@SerbianConspiracy]

FLAT We would have different stars in summer and in winter if we rotate around Sun. We just dont know what is sky or stars. They look like in mirror....

[@ljudskaglupostjebeskonacna6967]

Serbian Conspiracy Pričaš gluposti, zvezde se zajedno kreću sa nama i zato vidimo iste zvezde uvek. Idi u školu sve je objašnjeno

[@Bostonnick34]

Round. Compare "facing north in Arizona" to "facing South in Australia"

[@seanhammer6296]

needtoknow204 Yes.

[@RP12ification]

Thanks Serbian, just had a theory. Your video shows half of the northern and southern hemispheres simultaneously. This proves only one thing. Earth is stationed and it isn't spinning both sides the wrong way around. Flat Earth rules, I don't care what's above. I WANT TO KNOW WHERE I'M STANDING!

[@SerbianConspiracy]

ok. if its so, and sourh spining oposite from north, then on eqator , two houses on one side of equator line, would travel one from another every day. how you explain , that people around rquator dont noticing that they move from their neibors, one meter from other side of equator?

[@SerbianConspiracy]

earth is stationed, ok, but what about the oposite rotation of sky?

[@Totustuuss]

Heaven is a sphere 😍

[@binkyschiller78]

my god, it's full of stars!

[@LetsGetGewd]

2:19 well I guess that meteor can zig zag when it feels like it.

[@eve_avery]

Image is curved dude.

[@nsnogren]

i agree we can't infer the shape of the earth from the stars. however, the mirror explanation doesn't sit well with me. look up the astrolabe. it shows the main constellations on a flat rotating disc. It was used for at least 1500 years for navigation and science. Meaning, the stars above us, regardless of their APPARENT motions, could very well be flat and circular, rotating around a single point. Another excellent point I've heard very few people point out, is the video from Australia you're using shows several rotations in their timelapse, but in their picture, they only show a very short star trail. If you study closely, you can see the point of rotation is actually moving across the sky as well. This fits in with claims the southern pole stars can't be seen from all meridian lines at once.

[@nsnogren]

Another point i forgot, the southern "hemisphere" has roughly 50% more constellations than the northern. This also fits a flat plane belief, since the inner circle has less area than the outer ring.

[@nsnogren]

Actually there's another point as well. The book of Enoch, while i haven't read the whole thing myself, beautifully explains star motions. (see flat water's channels, he reads a lot of texts out loud) Enoch saw some stars going in and out of portals, and other stars which never set. That also could help explain. Southern stars may have portals, explaining how they appear only for a portion of the night for each meridian, while the northern stars, remaining above the horizon all night for every meridian, never set.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

Didnt know that center of rotation is moving too. will check that

[@TheRealCreepinogie]

Actually, the vertical angles from any location of Earth to any star plotted on a sphere makes sense, it doesn't on a flat surface. For example, the angle to either celestial pole is equal to the observers latitude. Each degree of latitude represents 69 miles along the surface of the Earth as measured. This is a constant distance anywhere on Earth. Impossible on a flat plane.

[@doocheit]

nsnogren So then why does everything rotate around a single point when facing south in southern hamisphere?

[@nofanfare7426]

THANK YOU!!!!! This confirms what I have been looking into. I started looking at Stellarium Software to see if I could find mirrored similarities. I looked at Ursa Major in the northern hemisphere and if you mirror that image then rotate it 180 degrees there is a star cluster almost same shape and position, like if you looked into a spoon which you could say is a portion of a dome. Also the constellation Cassiopeia is in near the same spot as The Southern Cross. I took it further and made a SMALL model with stars at top and recorded reflection with my phone inside the dome on a lazy susan geo location shifter which answered the troll Gerard Frensons question on how can we see the same constellations when looking three different directions on the flat earth, he went totally cut and paste nuts in the comments LOL. Found you at jazla111 Thumbs Up And Subscribed :)

[@SerbianConspiracy]

Thanks :) so you say that stars can me like mirrored from north hemisphere?

[@nofanfare7426]

I started to think that way yes. When I checked the idea with Stellarium it confirmed it to me, then a further confirmation with the model I built. The model is in no way sophisticated but it shows at least how stars follow you around like if you could move from Australia to South Africa as if on a record player turntable, the curved reflective surface.mirrors the stars at your vantage point. Also (In the model) as you leave the stars still and move your geo location clockwise the stars rotation then in the reflection go anti clockwise and the stars position match up with stellarium as well. If you want links to the vids I'll drop them here :)

[@SerbianConspiracy]

It would be good to check more. we see same horoscop constelations in same time from south and north just upside down

[@nofanfare7426]

Exactly. I also did a video (I'm not saying it's correct or not) where I was checking out in a low end 3D program if I could morph Cassiopeia into The Southern Cross. I got it by changing the view angle a bit. It was just a matter of how the stars were arranged, I didn't get them perfect but it was a time consuming battle to get as far as I got..

[@infinityfitSpokane]

No Fanfare yes because nothing says good science like, if you change this to that and stand over there it almost looks the same. Seriously, what’s wrong with believing in god AND accepting the earth in a globe.

[@ridiculewithoutresearch8828]

Lol so ignorant to think this proves the globe lmao. You are seeing lights through glass as THEY revolve around us.

[@eve_avery]

You're ignorant enough not to notice that nothing you said has any proof or validation.

[@magussimon7221]

That's what I call a nice one!

[@tunatunga]

This does not prove that the world is not flat. How do you know that planets don't move?

[@WatercraftGames]

Who said that planets don't move? And also, why are the other planets round, according to you?

[@tunatunga]

​@@WatercraftGames Why does the fact that all planets are round prove that the Earth is round too?

[@tunatunga]

Maybe the Earth is the center of the entire universe and has a vast area.

[@rafaelmarangoni]

@@tunatunga As we can see, there are TWO celestial hemispheres apparently rotating in TWO different directions around TWO distinct celesital poles. That's what a celestial sphere seen from a rotating planet looks like, buddy. Not a dome.

[@dominiqueletinnier7934]

Simple et efficace : j'adore.

[@Crossawnt]

I feel like im in a small snow globe but without snow

[@zakwanberlin]

Referring to your description, everything is upside down in the Southern Hemisphere. Star constellations, the moon, and the planets. You literally are proving a globe Earth with this. Stars shouldn’t move at all on a flat Earth.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

not to mine description but to reality, ask anyone in south hemisfere , where stars and sun comes out

[@mellosoft]

Great video Alex. A true Flat earth researcher who tell us as it is.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

Thanks Dave, I have checked many times is this video correct, and directions of star trails, and it is....

[@FriePresse]

i fully agrees you reach almost the same conclusions as i do

[@Ek1zde]

Do you realize that the fact the startrails spin in opposite directions means the earth is round?

[@gameoforbits3783]

the images are presented in a misleading way. What matters is that: *when you look North in the north, trail rotates counter clockwise.* *When you look to the south in the south, trail rotates clockwise.* That's why star trails prove the globe. Not to mention that you are seeing totally different stars in both places, which couldn't happen on a plain surface.

[@gameoforbits3783]

+Ek1zde the fact that there's 2 poles of rotation in itself shows a globe planet. The fact that their rotation is CCW and CW follows by direct logic.

[@theservant752]

NO CENTER POINT? useless for reference without it..

[@mikemcleroy8265]

Thanks for the comparison

[@rickt1866]

don't matter what direction you look its clockwise or counter clockwise duh

[@polapop4913]

So theres an option in professional photo editors that is called 'star swirl' Unless youre on the north or south pole the center of the stars will never be at the same center as the lens Gonna need better proof before I entertain your logic, my friend No harm intended :)

[@aaronatchley1038]

Fish eye lenses though. Good attempt.

[@rebornlegend878]

I never seen that many stars in the sky at once

[@puremusicdaz]

different stars, different directions = not a 1-poled flat earth but a 2-poled one, with four sides and four corners.

[@karce1981]

The earth is cubed.... Cubed earth 4 life!!!! Everyone had it wrong

[@TRINITY8400]

Beautiful

[@mikedemike5393]

here's another light year warriors kzbin.info/www/bejne/qn-rhmiBhK5sorM

[@GeoffreyHowells]

One day, the sky will role back as a scroll and you'll all crap your pants...

[@mils5574]

We are in a Torus hologram folks . Two opposing vortices stacked one n top of the other . Its both flat and global at the same time just like the stars rotate clockwise country clockwise at her SAME TIME . In one single motion we get two opposite direction . Like when we walk for example , our arms and legs move in opposite directions . Our arms arm the upper vortex and the legs are the lower set .

[@thephaneron3676]

*+mils* Terrible explanation. Both celestial hemispheres contain entirely unique sets of stars.

[@thephaneron3676]

*+mils* Seriously, think for just one second: All stars (both circumpolar and equatorial) move along an *east to west* orientation; they all move in the *exact same direction.* The only difference is that a) both hemispheres are quite literally *upside down* relative to one another, and b) the perspective (i.e. north or south POV) has changed. It's how we get the *Coriolis effect.*

[@DavidZimbeck]

it's really just perspective and refraction... no big deal. Just hard to figure out in retrograde. Maybe film adjacent cities all around the world at once so refraction can carry around the sides and see where the stars go.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

no, it is not, different constelations

[@certainpointofview3860]

@@SerbianConspiracy I’m surprised you said you researched flat earth, and met Dubay. But you never got an answer on southern star rotation? kzbin.info/www/bejne/qmSTXoyYlt6sjqc

[@boosomentity]

the problem with these videos and images of theses star trails is they're not truly circling the way the camera presents them to be, the fisheye lens is warping the apparent star paths to appear circular to the camera.

[@dandan2507]

So how we have the same effect in north and south celestial pole? If what are you claiming is true, we should have different star trails in north and south, considering that it's the same camera

[@lualalsa]

No perspective can do this.

[@Obryanm14]

Wow, it's almost like there is a celestial sphere inside of a concave Earth that rotates. cool.

[@alejandrox6116]

Looks like NASA’s photos

[@eve_avery]

Well if they're photographing the same thing they're bound to look similar.

[@OliveMule]

iiiiii love youuuuuu

[@imawildman]

Flat Earther's can't explain this. lol

[@Crocy]

What...

[@yskonsqi]

De sta vam je, nije zemlja ravna ploca! A da nesto ne stima oko cifri, to je tacno.

[@ivanrios8699]

In Australia earth is flat too

[@CrazyPets0]

Australia doesn't exist

[@paulcurran9343]

The concave earth !

[@SerbianConspiracy]

yea quadre earth

[@fontunetheteller410]

Completely wrong

[@alanm4986]

this video just proves that the earth is a globe and that it spins in the opposite direction in the the south

[@chd2614]

We need to figure this out to progress the flat earth...very interesting thnx

[@SerbianConspiracy]

You're welcome. They look like in mirror and not upside down...

[@TheBenevolentDictatorship]

CH D Yes, God forbid anyone follow the evidence wherever it may lead

[@redpilledarmy2391]

LOL, this proves beyond any doubt the earth is round, if you understand what you're looking at.

[@BigDGolf-23]

Obviously a joke

[@ryanb1874]

Whats the conspiracy. im guessinh aether earthers dont like thus video

[@SerbianConspiracy]

This debunks flat earth map, ae map

[@ryanb1874]

@@SerbianConspiracy show me the southern polaris equivalent.

[@SerbianConspiracy]

why you need polaris? there is south cross, center of rotation

[@massyfn9040]

yeeee..this video prove that the eliocentric model is totally wrong.....greathings

[@mattyboyahoy2326]

come on people..this is telling ou nothing but the bible is FACT and you better start adhereing

[@ptok-4.684]

mattyboy ahoy .. Flat earthers want scientific evidence & proof of a religious fallacy.

[@peterhoebarth4234]

............South..........., ? Fake - Picture..................Earth is flat..........