Starfield WILL Disappoint You

[@sebastianprimomija8375]

Like a fine wine, this aged.

[@SlothyTendecies]

He wasn’t wrong.

[@matexf4c]

Not one bit

[@leiferikson5029]

@@matexf4c He was

[@-pressxtostart-]

​@@leiferikson5029prove it

[@LSK2K]

​@@-pressxtostart-Play Starfield.

[@ImmortalComposer]

@@LSK2K Probably the only way you can make people play it at this point XD

[@peterthomas5363]

This aged very well 😏

[@ravereiko]

It did. This games boring as fuck. Deleted it after a couple of days

[@goratron1]

I just couldn't get past 12 hours or so, it was terrible.

[@tomm1109]

Only on the planets part. Everything else is great.

[@maulressurected4405]

@@goratron1 I couldn't get past the first mission, didn't even go on the ship. Game didn't pull me in at all. Fallout in space with none of what made the Fallout games good. I don't see mods being able to fix the game there's nothing to build off of. If mods fix the game you will need a load order of over 2,000 mods.

[@naiarabibi2015]

What a shock! He was right

[@LSK2K]

Breathtaking profile picture lmao.

[@AronHallan]

Aged like Fine Wine.

[@roundone21]

You were right all along

[@CJ-jk9mp]

😂

[@Kilo-sn3yl]

1 year predict is fucking insane

[@Rihardololz]

What happen to 76 its not far fetched.

[@skysoftware4581]

this aged well lol the more game is hyped the less i want to board the train

[@maulressurected4405]

I saw the hype for Fallout 76 and knew it wouldn't deliver and then the same hype package was used for Starfield. I knew it wouldn't deliver and the only bright side it was playable at launch.

[@Sgt.ArchDornan]

Its beautiful seeing everyone come back to this video

[@hammy2.039]

This man is a prediction god

[@melgibsonsjacuzzi]

I'm not saying he wasn't right, it's just that bethesda has been making this same game since 2006. I understand expecting something from this game if you're into sci fi, or if you really liked fallout 4, but other than that, it's apparent bethesda has been dead for years. they're just making money, they aren't making art, like they were back in daggerfall/morrowind days

[@Vert_GreenHeart]

It's not really that difficult to predit this would happen really...

[@divisionunion1658]

Making futuristic sc fi on a outdated engine

[@evzenvarga9707]

​@@melgibsonsjacuzziBethesda had interesting worlds before Starfield.

[@miller42]

I'm going to pre-order Starfield and buy another Skyrim to support that small indie dev.

[@cleverman383]

Exactly! Microsoft needs the support!

[@thekvng201]

@@cleverman383 lol

[@Jack_War]

@@cleverman383 poor Microsoft, it needs our help! 😩👌

[@johnv6806]

I must be such a disappointment. I only bought it once at launch and never paid for any of the DLC.

[@souldry]

I, myself, will be preordering 27 copies to help support the developer. What game is this?

[@Storm0fSteel]

I'm from the future and you were right about everything. This game is extremely disappointing.

[@badman5363]

Finally released and you were completely right. Generic garbage shooter, boring damage sponge enemies, and trash npc AI.

[@thequinlanshow3326]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@samcarter420]

You're especially right about the NPC A.I... I've seen better NPC A.I. in GTA San Andreas in that was on a PS2. 😂 🗑️

[@covert965]

Agreed the menu was also very annoying to go through lol and I honestly find my self in situtations that I have no idea how got into them lol

[@BoleDaPole]

But muh heckin 1000 planets and pronouns! So revolutionary.

[@Dannyboy31805]

The only damage sponge people are like bosses or if you’re under leveled. The NPC ai at least for enemies is fine at least on hard which is what I played on, they can beam you.

[@JohnDoe-cz5yz]

My man was right all along. Nice.

[@intricateentity2360]

Looks like he was right

[@Chrissy212]

Its so bad it needs to be put in a pit burned and forgotten

[@TheParagonIsDead]

Bro didn’t played.

[@rye7839]

1000 planets is one of the biggest red flags I've ever heard in a game presentation, Bethesda cant fulfill that claim

[@anonymous_dot_com2326]

Even if the planets are empty, they did say there is a lot more hand crafted content they've ever made in a video game.. so if you don't like the planets you can just follow the story like a normal Bethesda game since it will have 4 large cities

[@aaronatkinson177]

It's going to be no man's sky all over again 😂

[@zhulikkulik]

-Eeeeehh... Boss, maybe we'll make one planet with a thousand quests? -One. Thousand. Planets.

[@chungang7037]

Didn't Star Citizen originally promise the same thing?

[@pressstart8738]

Repetitive fuck game

[@danielsurvivor1372]

Bro legit predicted future. We were wrong to doubt you

[@bens9422]

ive been playing for 8 hours now and it suuuuucks theres vertually no difference to fall out 4. i am gutted

[@smuggy8576]

In Fallout 4 you could walk for more than 10 minutes without a load screen

[@richardhambel648]

@@smuggy8576 Not enough people are pointing out this glaring difference.

[@BigDanGaming]

I'm rooting for Starfield to be good. I love sci-fi RPGs but I don't have a whole lot of faith in Bethesda these days. I'm keeping my expectations low for this one, especially after that gameplay reveal

[@The_Gent]

Dan, the mods are gona be insane for this game. Just wait til the Quest Mods start coming out that are like Fallout London. I alrdy know theyre gonna make Mass Effect & Star Wars. Hopefully Babylon 5 quest mods

[@BigDanGaming]

@@The_Gent Yeah it will be interesting to see what modders come up with. They're what keeps Bethesda games going years after launch

[@Mourningstar-kc7ft]

The lack of voiced protagonist is gonna make quest mods a lot easier to make.

[@thorburnjschwegler]

Same, there's a lot of room for sci-fi RPG

[@thomasrial4444]

Here I’ll help a little bit Fallout 4 had a bunch of lore breaking problems that Starfield can’t have because this is the first iteration FO4 had 111k lines of dialogue and a little less than half of that was the main protagonist Starfield has 200k+ lines of dialogue with no voiced protagonist They added more time to development And they didn’t show off the whole game I think those point mixed with what they showed publicly of the game currently tells me why I’m gonna buy it. Though if you end up wanting to wait just wait and see if it’s good. It’s gonna be better than most of the game I play anyways so it doesn’t matter to me.

[@PeteD]

Starfield is almost exactly like I imagined it would be gameplay wise (based off this first look).

[@soulofachristian8704]

It's look nice 👌

[@No-rr5jj]

I always thought it would look like heavily modded Fallout 4. It does.

[@Falcons8455]

i was hoping theyd finally move away from the lifeless NPC look.

[@thedarklordx]

Fallout 4 meets No Man's Sky is what I wanted to play.

[@dougdimidome2223]

@@No-rr5jj yup and they are going to have mod support for starfield so it'll be like that but on steroids

[@UsmevavyPanacek]

If people were capable of learning from experience, stuff like micro-transactions and games being sold unfinished would have never became norm. But deep respect for trying to make people learn anyway.

[@italiangarbageposting]

That's because people were ok with it, most people just let that happen, people paid moneyto get the cool skin/gun and then forgot about it, the ones who believed it was horrible didn't do anything about it.

[@kjell3807]

They are capable of learning. Bethesda just knows that modders will finish the game for them

[@jyrese117]

Oh yeah he’s so redpilled and so much smarter than us for being able to comprehend that starfield will be ass, nobody else agrees with that

[@allan640]

Hehe... For the Boomer comment I must say " Well back in my day DLC was called expansions and micro transactions were give a penny take a penny at the convenience store" And... Im not a Boomer, my mother is :)

[@coleeckerman1390]

It’s not a dumb choice for the corporations, it just needs to have a good trailer and be pretty ok and they initially make the same amount of money. Although I think optimism or pessimism can make someone delusional, and YTers play on this fact to overhype or under hype something to get views rather than look at something plainly.

[@BloodKitten_]

Starfield will just work, its a tryed and tested engine since fallout 3, and we saw how well it worked in fallout 4 and 76.

[@lanceelopezz223]

"It just works."

[@superplayerex2431]

Actually, Bethesda SUPPOSEDLY stopped using the old and dated Creation Engine that they've been using since Morrowind and made a new one for Starfield. However, they called it Creation Engine 2, so I wouldn't have any (let alone high and low) hopes for a stable game experience free of bugs or crashes.

[@wizzotizzo]

@@superplayerex2431 my guess is that ce2 is a heavily reworked version of 1, but not a complete remake because of time constraints and community modding

[@TheKwod]

IT WORKED FINE ON PC SONY FANBOY. TAKE YOUR TODD HOWARD CANCER ELSEWHERE. I LOVE TODD LIKE I LOVE BOB SAP.

[@ponchopower]

​@@superplayerex2431 the trailer they put out wasn't even running at 60fps i'd say that's plenty of reason not to put any faith in the supposed new engine

[@vienasvienintelis]

Starfield showcase was exactly what I was expecting. Fallout 4 in space with no man's sky mix. The only thing that supprised me was that u can customised ship and have crew in it. The randomized terrain was not something new, they did same with skyrim. Yes not many people know that skyrim terrain was generated.

[@SparklingWalrus]

Fallout 4 in space is a retarded way to put it. How are the two games even remotely similar when one is post apocalyptic and the latter is the opposite? it’s more like skyrim/oblivion in space with no man’s sky elements and a skill/class system similar to oblivion. The only fallout 4 elements i can think of is leveling up specific skills and some of the gunplay.

[@HGHsChannel]

@Dillon And I believe even Morrowind had some amount of Proc Gen. And let's not start about Daggerfall lmao

[@Moncha606]

Skyrim has randomly generated terrain??

[@HGHsChannel]

@@Moncha606 even fallout 4 has some. It's not the entire map, but it's very useful

[@Van420Dal]

@@Moncha606 most modern games in general use procedural systems to generate all sorts of different things even Spider-Man used it

[@GyaruRespecter]

Coming back after over a year, it's incredible/depressing how right he was. Synth-sama, I kneel...

[@escala8559]

To make starfield better: -turn down the notch in the planets. From 1000 to 20 tops. -make gunplay, skill and level matter. -make a resource hoarding faction so farming isn't an absolute slog. -make player made settlements face timed raids only after reachin a certain size, and make said raids scale according to settlement size and player level, fun stuff. -make space in the space game actually have content. Bases, enemy ships, boutyhunting, alien encounters, the works.

[@GA-br8wj]

If you want to make it better just uninstall it and keep up with your life

[@SolaireGamingPT]

Bold of you to assume there won't be more gaming disasters before Starfield is released 😂!

[@BillClinton228]

If the game is made by a AAA studio I just presume it will be garbage now, altough games like Forza Horizon 5 and Halo Infinite were an exception but they are few and far between.

[@keonkla]

@@K4L-ZL 343 fanboys are a uinque breed. I hope synthetic tears halo infinite a new one someday jus to hear 343 simps go crazy.

[@iattacku2773]

That’s the trick synthetic it can’t disappoint me if I don’t have high expectations to begin with.

[@darkigg]

"expect disappointing and you will never be disappointed"

[@johnv6806]

It can't disappoint you if you have NO expectations.

[@PaxBisonica89]

You sound like a geek

[@tomfoolery7797]

They will find a way don't worry.

[@ary8956]

Hahaha that's what I said about anthem, and bro I got disappointed big time

[@Top_Hat_Walrus]

You’re wrong about every Bethesda fan not enjoying large scale worlds that use procedural generation, I’ve seen Daggerfall fans who are excited about the switch back to procedural generation and the sense of scale Starfield could bring. Personally I’m not very positive about it

[@hazey0363]

Slight difference in a 20 to 30 year old game to a brand new one just look at how bad it was in fallout 4, In my opinion that should create more now and use it less

[@sebastiandalessandro4221]

@Zoomer Stasi but isn’t that exactly what this guy in the video did? Is just everybody wrong even when the facts are right infront of you? Twat

[@domehammer]

Procedural generation in hands of modders will be great. Look at minecraft then look at modded biomes, is amazing what modders can do to a game. Unless Bethesda goes full anti-modders.

[@Kodbryson]

@@domehammer Bethesda would never go full anti modders there entire brand wouldn’t be half as big if it wasn’t for the modding community and creation club

[@Solidfreeman01]

Exactly! There are people like zaric zhakaron streaming daggerfall without real fast travel, just BECAUSE it is so vast and empty. Just to appreciate this feeling of having a huge, real sized world.

[@Tk--cp9xw]

Well shit here we are

[@DavidAllen-gc7cm]

I wonder if all the 1000 planets will have 16 TIMES THE DETAIL

[@thorburnjschwegler]

Press X to doubt

[@Legion849]

@@thorburnjschwegler X

[@pangloss565]

They've got a mining mechanic where you point a laser at ore. This is much cooler than mining with explosives and taking chunks out of destructible terrain. I would much rather aim a laser at world geometry than chunkify it. So much more satisfying. Everyone will be interested in Let's Plays of ore mining.

[@scottwerner279]

Honestly it’s weird how this mining system is literally the same thing we got with Skyrim

[@alphabroncotwozero392]

I love holding the button and then I get a thingy pop up in the bottom left (I got 1 copper!!)

[@DisDatK9]

Bu-bu-but there’s particle effects! Lol I can just imagine myself next year playing this and seeing the only good weapon requiring hours upon hours of mining, putting the controller down, and never touching it again. New engine, same old Todd. Edit: sorry, I’ll correct it, “Updated* engine, same old Todd”

[@modernmobster]

Remember when you could blow up most of the world in Red Faction: Guerrilla? Apparently the gaming industry doesn't.

[@vincethebanana]

This ^ hence why I love Empyrion Galactic Survival. It may not be the AAA type of game everyone expects nowadays but it’s fun. You go around and gather materials and bulls your base, make your ship, and fly to new planets. Definitely worth the cost of game, and if Starfield is anything like that game, which it totally looks like it, I will be very interested in it. I will never pre order games because it’s all a ploy to inflate sales numbers nowadays and I want to put my wallet where my mouth is, but I will totally keep an eye on this game.

[@sunso1991]

"Dont preorder" words of a wise man! the whole point of preorder was from the era of physical cassette copies and Flipy/CD/DVD install disks. they only made so many and it COULD run out. now everything is digital copy, seriously, wait for a day or two and decide if it is actually worth getting. I didnt get BFV until 2 weeks later on 50% discount, and i didnt get BF2042 because it was so bad i didnt even the finish 10 hour trial. why preorder and blindly trust these studios with such a bad track record?!

[@dominiquesmith6745]

Dont need to pre order lol its on gamepass day 1

[@sentientbattleship1882]

I agree, nowadays even for a good game you shouldn't pre-order, this will more than likely be a disappointment(at best) if fallout 4 and fallout 76 are any indication.

[@BoleDaPole]

Yup, thankfully us Microsoft fans get the game for free day 1 Phil is a great guy 😎

[@dominiquesmith6745]

@@sentientbattleship1882 thatll be subject to opinion because i liked fallout 4 and liked fallout 76 me and my friends still enjoy it together to this day. A lot that didnt like it aint have no friends lol

[@neoconker2k8]

It's just money though , pre-order whatever game you think you will like.

[@AnonymousAnonposter]

Bugthesda sisters... We got btfo'd again.

[@neonblack211]

"The character models are vastly improved" hehehehe

[@LSK2K]

Lmao

[@ndwknss]

The game absolutely sucked. Once again, Synthetic Man was spot on, as always.

[@Randaddy25]

This game is extremely disappointing. What a shocker.

[@Rickus316]

100% agree I’m tapering my expectations to low. When he said 4 cities and ‘1000 planets and 100 systems’ I was like ugh 🤦‍♂️ so most are going to barren boring worlds collecting resources 🙁

[@thev3432]

Just think, this game was proclaimed as best game ever made before we even saw any footage.

[@damondriver6363]

@@thev3432 thank the overhyped bethestards for that

[@whenisdinner2137]

He said four major cities not four cities.

[@pressstart8738]

@@thev3432 bahahha yes… dumbest fanbase ever…

[@commandandconquer6303]

If every planet had life there would be no accomplishment. And you only have to collect resources if you want to change something or upgrade stuff. Don't want to mine resources? Cool have fun staying stuck on starter shit.

[@Tanzu15]

Lmfao this video aged to PERFECTION!

[@TheParagonIsDead]

How so.

[@Honk_Clank]

Aged well 😎

[@MortSalazar]

My expectations are this: A new sci fi, exploration game with at least elements of rpg that i didn't play before Side hope: Have it be less buggy than Oblivion Reality: It probably won't be but the fans will fix it with unofficial patches so i'm good Not a single Bethesda game out there that the fans didn't have to fix. Nah, won't disappoint cuz my expectations don't fly at escape velocity and don't fly higher than the moon.

[@Banizar]

My expectations: Millennium Falcon fly with dargon animations and broken havok (creationkit physics engine) to the moon.

[@fr33kSh0w2012]

Oblivion was actually less buggy then fallout 3

[@MortSalazar]

@@fr33kSh0w2012 Oh yeah, how do you measure I wonder? Personally I didn't count every single crash that occured, I know there was a lot Both games fall under "buggy as all shit" Doesn't matter that one bowl of soup has less feces in it if it's still feces anyway.

[@fr33kSh0w2012]

@@MortSalazar How's puberty treating you?

[@MortSalazar]

@@fr33kSh0w2012 Really? High school insults? Over what? Me having a different opinion about levels of some old game's buggyness? Classy

[@Morfe02]

Space Skyrim $100

[@Storm0fSteel]

Don't insult Skyrim like that. Skyrim is way better than this pile of trash.

[@josemedina1805]

Todd claims 1000 planets we'll get to explore, yet somehow after how much that guy at Hello Games ran his mouth before No Man's Sky released has me doubting. Now imagine how much worse my suspicions are when you take into account how Todd himself lied to our faces about Fallout 76.

[@kyle857]

"1000 times the planets."

[@tonymk-ii2614]

Even if there are 1000 planets watch as the only interesting ones that are mandatory to visit for the story

[@trickledowneconomicsfail7127]

@@tonymk-ii2614 then dont go to any other planets lol

[@MVPMTKING]

Being a space exploration game thats how it should be, many planets, with most not being Interesting. Similar to Mass Effect, many are baron wastelands, sometimes finding some kind of outposts, creatures, etcetc. With some of the main planets being relevant to stories, having hub worlds, etc.

[@sb17899]

what did Todd lie about in F76? I don't remember

[@frostreaper1607]

Glad I didn't pre-order, seems like my fears became reality.

[@derekli8757]

I feel like most of these are preferences that you don’t likes. I actually do like gathering resources and I loved the base building in fallout 4. I spent at least 50hrs building sanctuary or cleaning it up. I can understand what you mean and I hope it is optional in starfield as well and hopefully, the resource gathering isn’t going to be intensive

[@slicer2938]

yeah im actually super excited for the return of a settlement system, i fucking loved how it worked because it was actually complex(although without mods a little buggy at times) but i personally put in about 100 hours into settlements and it was enjoyable. i do hope that they do try and fix the performance issues i would have when entering my settlements, many of my big settlements had 50+ settlers and my game would occassionally crash and very often stutter.

[@infernaldaedra]

I agree. This dude sounds like he wakes up mad everyday.

[@Entertainment-ev6ob]

Graphics being dogshit performance being horrible lack of AI shit ai etc etc is all preferences ok enjoy your trash just like fallout 76 lol

[@matthewbartley2746]

Yeah, this type of toxic personal never good enough preference is why the industry is so shit. I love Bethesda, I'm not always happy with them. But I'm sincerely hoping starfield does reasonably well. If not then Bethesda game studios might just be dissolved by Microsoft and left ONLY as a production outfit for actual studios to develop games for Microsoft. I do not want to lose the magic, mystery, and insanity of Bethesda games. Elder Scrolls. Fallout, and hopefully Starfield.. are simply too important to many many of us gamers to just blindly and arrogantly turn away. I believe Bethesda learned a powerful lesson with F76. We do not want Bethesda to do what every one else is doing. "here's a cheapened experience that isn't what you asked for and dreamed of... and well.sell you the rest of the game in store through microtransactions" I'm wholly convinced Ed Microtransactions exist for no other purpose than to use a shit unfinished game to fleece a couple extra bucks out of the consumer's naive stupidity to recoup costs on a shit timetable for development cycle. They can't make the money with sales and support. And they know that.. so they try and interrim.measure to get some costs back. Believe it or not. You make.more money with a game people love, than with a game people don't enjoy but are stuck with because there's nothing else.

[@trenchcoats4life891]

I'm in agreement with him. This base building stuff is stupid.

[@mattboggs6304]

When that guy walks off the ship towards the player at 16:11, all I can think about him saying is "Another settlement needs our help. I'll mark it on your map."

[@Marcara081]

If they're going to 'reimagine' RE4 why tf don't they just make it a different game altogether starring Leon?

[@Quazzi]

RE2 is the same thing they'll just end up making the same game but better.

[@xx_amongus_xx6987]

Nostalgia money

[@Spillow-C]

the answer is obvious, because it wouldn't be called "Resident Evil 4", so less sales for them

[@Marcara081]

@@xx_amongus_xx6987 Not even. Anyone nostalgic for RE4 would buy a new Leon game made in the same vein. Remakes don't appeal as much to new fans, so it really doesn't make sense.

[@xx_amongus_xx6987]

@@Marcara081 Yeah, someone nostalgic for RE4 would buy a new Leon game, but there is no promise of that game being good and it would take a lot of effort. Instead, they can just take something that people already love, give it a new coat of paint, and everyone will buy it. Old nostalgic fans are exactly their main target with these games. And the second target of people are new fans. These remakes absolutely appeal to new fans. What new fan wants to play some aged hard to access game? (Even if they did, there would be no profits for the producer at this point). The new fans would rather play a new, modernized version of something. Maybe you disagree or don't fit into either of those categories, but most do, and that is why these remakes keep on happening. If not for the two groups of people I mentioned, who do you think is buying all of the new RE remakes?

[@justaquietpeacefuldance]

6:45 When I played games like Fallout 2 or Baldur's Gate 2 those worlds felt bigger, not 'cause they had previous entries in the series or an open ending, but because people who wrote them reached beyond the gameplay with their imagination and took me with them on a journey. I was playing through a fragment of a story. Now it's like: That's the Open World, those are bad people, they're marked red, enjoy!

[@chillyman7340]

I agree with that 1k planets thing, it is impossible to make such detail for so many different planets with detail. It's probably going to be copy and paste type game, haven't been excited for any new games lately, great video man :)

[@vectorvictor6181]

Obviosly each world won't be hand crafted. They did say that this game has the most hand crafted content to date from them though.

[@hallucy2215]

i think its possible, its easy for them to generate landscapes maybe with different textures and trees or something, its like sandbox

[@hallucy2215]

not every planet has to have a building, it is possible

[@alpinthor]

i guess there will be at least 5 very detailed planet, and the rest is procedural & only for resource gathering. I prefer that for immersion because livable planet are insanely rare.

[@hhffbman5601]

@@hallucy2215 it’s more realistic. Space is very barren

[@elsestatement8958]

the 1000 planets are definitely just gonna be barren planets where you do some fallout 4 base building and have randomly generated npcs staff them and they spit generic dialogue at you, i'm calling it, they probably just mine materials for you while you are off somewhere else lmao

[@levijackson767]

The leveling and rpg mechanics looks good. I prey the crafting won't be a chore. About the planets if we get 50 fleshed out "handcrafted planets" I'll be happy, but I doubt it tho.

[@alexbrown925]

The problem to me with the reveal is how they’re presenting the different planets. We have knowledge of thousands and thousands of planets and to our knowledge only a few are habitable. so having a vast empty galaxy of wasteland ish planets with 30-40 well designed planets would be great.

[@Elnegro..]

More like 10 to 15 handcrafted planets are plausible

[@Dragon_Lair]

You do know that Oblivion's landscape was procedurally generated, right?

[@zmss8537]

@@Dragon_Lair you have a point ?

[@Dragon_Lair]

@@zmss8537 The point is that procedural generation is not a bad thing. It's been something Bethesda has been doing since Daggerfall. A lot of planets will be empty and that makes sense. A lot of planets in real life are empty. No one has ever played a Bethesda game for the gameplay. "I love Morrowind for its deep gameplay mechanics" said no one ever. No, it's the that sense of exploration, procedurally generated events, being who we want to be, to go on our own adventures, that is why people play Bethesda games. I'm not sure why Bethesda suddenly has so many people hating on them and their games when everyone already knows what to expect from them.

[@GoRamz]

You didn't like the junk system in fallout 4? I thought it was a cool way to give a reason to pick up random garbage you find laying around. What would your ideal system be? Just no resource cost and you can make whatever whenever?

[@CentaurMoe]

I personally hated the crafting / junk collection. I don't mind crafting in games if it's not something that needs me to hoover up a lot of junk. I also hate the borderline style of a million similar weapons with slightly different numbers. Give me a smaller well thought out showcase if equipment that actually has some individually. So much of fallout 4 is just doing boring mindless candy crush shit between some actually fun moments, IMO.

[@GoRamz]

@@CentaurMoe what is a game that you think has a good crafting system and a good amount of equipment to use? curious

[@CentaurMoe]

@@GoRamz I like when crafting doesn't involve needing to continuously hoover up common junk (unless crafting is the main focus of the gane, like Minecraft or Valheim) Dead risings crafting system is something I could get behind in Bethesda games, although they wouldn't really fit in Strarfield. Idk, crafting in an RPG is just some thing I never wanted, I'm fine with buying weapon mods, but I've never played new vegas and wished I could be doing this but also needing to be on the lookout for 40 wonder glues. It's just busy work that gets in the way of me playing the game IMO.

[@GoRamz]

@@CentaurMoe interesting, my opinion is that if fallout 4 was just walk from place to place shooting everything it would be pretty boring I think looking for things and crafting makes the world feel more engaging

[@d0o0b-w1g]

WOW SO MUCH FUN GAMEPLAY WHEN TP BACK AND FORTH EVERYTIME YOUR INV IS FULL!

[@hixym]

3500 bethesda employees disliked this...

[@cantrun5491]

just came here to let you know that you were right

[@Greez1337]

You can't disappoint one with no expectations.

[@TheKwod]

MAYBE YIU SONY FANBOY WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF GAMES. STARFIELD WILL BE KILLER, LED BY TODD. TODD INNOVATE WHERE OTHER STUDIOS MAKE UNDEVELOPED UNFINISHED TURDS.

[@IxodesPersulcatus]

Typically my reaction to trailers is "What you're shown is all you get. Disregard all implications."

[@kuklama0706]

Learned this the hard way with Sega's bullshit

[@WolfyWagsTail]

I think when it comes to Bethesda games there's already a clear expectation of what you're getting into because most of their games tend to follow the same structure if anything I am excited for starfield because I do like space related games such as building a ship traveling to other planets exploring space stations extraterrestrial things, I'm not going into starfield expecting huge innovations in gameplay or amazing Blockbuster Michael Bay type scenes, I think this game will do just fine if I'm being honest.

[@JavierGomezX]

People don't seem to understand true innovation hardly ever means a brand new original thing never seen before. Innovation is done little by little, by adding new features, ideas and procedures to an already existent model, and push the boundaries of what was possible before. As long as they improve on their existent achievements I will consider it a success.

[@HorrorshowEU]

Agreed, don't listen to this contrarian.

[@cagneybillingsley2165]

these big studio rpg devs didn't learn from the sleeper hit kingdom come deliverance

[@DirtCobaine]

THANK YOU Jesus these people want EVERY game to be the most innovative ground breaking game of the year for every single game during every single release. I haven’t been more annoyed with the gaming community constantly complaining and regurgitating the same opinions they heard from their favorite KZbinrs which both have no idea what they’re talking about. I have a feeling when starfield comes out it’s gonna be a consistent solid experience the entire time, and because we haven’t gotten a consistently decent game in all aspects it’s going to be game of the year. I just know it. And frankly I don’t care if it’s not, I’m very excited, Bethesda is the only game studios that makes games consistently exactly how I like them and they will continue to do so. And Fallout 76 doesn’t count because I don’t care for multiplayer games, it wasn’t the same studio that were all familiar with, and the only work they did on it was the wastelanders expansion and frankly I played it just for that and it was genuinely good. It’s a god damn space rpg that lets you do whatever you want. Not even mass effect can say that. If you want that space marine mass effect vibe you can be, if you want to be a space bounty hunter you can be. If you want to be a smuggler or space pirate you can be. Tell me what single player games let you do that? THATS why I’m excited. Space battles are in the game and they look good. Those 1000 planets are there because in every Bethesda game you can go anywhere you see so they wanted to give you the option of traveling to every planet you see even if some of them won’t be interesting. And it’s up to we the players to make those planets interesting. Build a secret smugglers den on one, or a forward operating base, or a space farm and start your own industry. This is what what makes Bethesda games great. Is Role play and decent enough systems to further support that role play. And there isn’t a single developer who does games for us rpers like Bethesda. Cyberpunk was supposed to be that and it didn’t even come close. So I’m excited for Starfield and it will be just enough to hold me over until Elder Scrolls 6 and miss out if you want to miss out.

[@SyndicateOperative]

@@DirtCobaine No one said anything about innovation. It's just you weird fanboys that flocked here from reddit or some other hellhole. What Synthman is obviously complaining about regarding most games is that the gameplay in new games is often extremely dull, and doesn't compare to older titles - which isn't surprising, due to game development becoming increasingly mainstream, less talented/capable people are entering the game development industry (it should be noted that originally it was almost entirely populated by enthusiastic supernerds; it's really not a field "normal" people can compete in). I.e. not innovation, just quality of gameplay.

[@someraccoon4690]

Yeah, the TLOU remake just strikes me as Naughty Dog desperately trying to salvage the franchise’s reputation after TLOU2 generated so much controversy

[@coreycasciano3255]

It 100% is

[@kyle857]

To keep the 1000 planets thing in perspective. There are 343 individual locations in Skyrim. Some of them are nothing morw than a shack. If you think these planets will be full of interesting things to explore and not just procedurally generated poop, then I have a bridge in New York to sell you.

[@bjornolfactory9363]

Godd Howard - "You see that planet? You can fly there!" Me - "What's on that planet?" Godd Howard - "Absolutely Nothing!"

[@tubalord3693]

@@bjornolfactory9363 no shit space doesn’t work that way this argument is all bark no bite

[@OnlyForF1]

Nobody expects every planet to be full of handcrafted content though? Like nobody expects you to visit every icy rock in the galaxy, they’re there so you can mine resources etc.

[@michaelkemmerlin6044]

My question is where are the aliens

[@frankieragnarok4568]

@@michaelkemmerlin6044 There aren't any in this thankfully.

[@queenform]

i'll be coming back to this video if starfield ends up being the best game of 2023

[@amunra1743]

Hahah you wish, its a game of Bugthesda for God sake....

[@burn8325]

We want it to be good. But we’re not simps for a company. We’re not friends. I’m paying for this game. They’re charging the same price that rockstar charge for the likes of rdr2. Why tf would I settle for shit games like fo4?

[@dovahkiin3379]

your comment feels defensive of Bethesda, like you think we're mocking them for no reason and don't want their games to succeed, which obviously isn't the truth, it's the very opposite in fact, fans have every reason to be disappointed in Bethesda after the last shameful decade, yet we want them to break out of it and bring back bangers like Morrowind, Oblivion, fallout 3, doom... but they just don't want to listen since kids with half brains will buy any trash game Bethesda throws at them with extremely minimal improvement over the last game or even becoming worst I guess you're one of them, so if starfield turns out to be just playable you'll be back here sucking Bethesda off, unaware that if you raised your standards just a little bit the gaming industry would a better place now

[@samarveersingh3904]

me too

[@lemmy154]

Im saving your comment

[@hazardousmaterials-ff7nm]

Bro knew all along

[@TheAdoringFan]

I view the 1000 planets as an addition to what they’ve handcrafted. Not super worried as long as they have the stuff they normally have in their game.

[@precariousworlds3029]

Mhm. Worst case scenario we just have a bunch of dull planets that you never have to visit. Not the end of the world

[@mikehorne4053]

@@precariousworlds3029 That's actually kind of what Todd described in the extended showcase. He said some ice ball planets are just gonna be ice balls. They'll probably have some resources on them, but not much else to do. He said the team wanted to add them to give the player the option of exploring more and to be able to say "Yes you can land there," instead of "No that area's out of bounds." I'm fine with 990 planets having 10ish minutes of gameplay if the remaining 10 are really solid.

[@Kuhtlass]

@@mikehorne4053 Todd also mentioned it was a playground, just imagine what the modding community can do. They can take a planet with nothing on it and turn it into something amazing, and that's just a single planet.

[@mikehorne4053]

@@Kuhtlass That was my thoughts as well, I'm super excited for what the modding community could do with Starfield, but I didn't bring it up because it's important to me that game devs don't use modders as a crutch. I want the base game to be great before I do a second/third/eighty-fourth playthrough with mods.

[@BoleDaPole]

Sure, and I view herpes as a fun companion.

[@agtl3168]

I haven't been disapointed by a Bethesda singleplayer game yet and they're the only ones who make these kind of sandbox rpg's, that even supported long after release so i'm all in

[@Frost-yq8kg]

you have shit taste

[@mrmontanapilot7247]

Couldn't have said it better myself. I trust them to make a game I'll enjoy.

[@Jack_War]

Lol, you really have low quality standards...

[@johnv6806]

If by supported you mean they sell and re-release games. They made like 3 games in a row that had the same bugs and never fixed them.

[@wallacesousuke1433]

@@mrmontanapilot7247 you enjoy the trash they make? Jeebus, omega loser

[@animonarch3858]

The exploration could give a handcrafted feel if they had 50 years

[@nigeltheoutlaw]

The only way it would work is if they made a Forge tier map editor and invited modders and fanboys to custom build a planet for Bethesda. The quality would vary wildly from one to another, but you could at least bet all would be lovingly hand crafted. This has actually been something I often bring up for open world games, and can only assume the devs won't allow it out of elitism, or the corporation won't allow it out of a fear of losing a shred of control. Instead it'll be Mass Effect 1 tier, procedurally generate rocks, times 1000.

[@SomeCanine]

Fallout 4 was more fun than soyfield.

[@toddhoward1133]

I liked fallout 4(altough not my favorite bgs game) and I liked no mans sky other than the fact there was no sense of threat on any planet and nothing pushing you to mine. I think we are going to get a Bethesda game surrounded by a no mans sky and not only am I ok with that, I'm alottle excited. Of course it will launch broke and riddled with bugs but news of the main protagonist actually being silent unlike fallout 4 and the ability to dock to space stations and other ships, yeah I'm excited. Totally get why not everyone would be though.

[@GoldenLeafsMovies]

I really like FO4, even though I understand the previous games had more of a fallout feel and were subjectively better.

[@Christo_glenn]

70k Subs! Congrats mate. Been here when this channel only had about 10k. Thanks for not watering-down your opinions or bending to the will of the general masses. Keep up the work!

[@soulofachristian8704]

His opinion sound robotic and like a safe route. He don't know what he's talking for the most part.

[@Gruntvc]

Yeah, I'd like Starfield to be awesome. But this is still Bethesda and Todd Howard. We'll see. I was more disappointed that Goldeneye 007 Remaster didn't show up and no update on Perfect Dark either. Plus, I think there's supposed to be another Wolfenstein game too...

[@punishedmatteson7108]

An updated Perfect Dark would be awesome as shit! I played the hell out of that game on the 64.

[@shioq.]

Look up Agent 64: Spies Never Die.

[@Kveldred]

Can confirm, big Bethesda (and Obsidian) fan here (...still, somehow) since the Morrowind days - and one of the most disappointing things to me about a lot of space games such as NMS is that no one's really made one with lots of the interesting little RPG touches (NPCs, questlines, ruins, cities, etc) I liked about Morrowind or New Vegas. THAT'S what I want, not empty landscapes - no matter how pretty or expansive.

[@JoshJr98]

I just hope that the exploration and stuff is good. I don't need a big story mode. I just wanna travel in my ship and build planetary settlements

[@infernaldaedra]

There's a huge story, faction questlines, and sidequests whether you want it or not. It's in the game. All optional.

[@spacegobbieentertainment4270]

I'm for both, and doing it at my own pace. I've spent years and years in fallout and skyrim, as well as no man's sky. This is perfect for what I crave. I just hope you get different ship classes/sizes.

[@SyndicateOperative]

The problem with fallout 4's enemy AI is that it was designed for players stealthing/taking cover during battles. They established search grids/teams, spread out, etc., and it's all very cool... except that's not how anyone plays fallout 4. People just run and gun, and the AI has no idea how to deal with that. Anyway, I've got my hopes up for skyrim in space, if only so that I can enjoy having my hopes up for awhile. After all, for all of fallout 4's failings, it was still *kinda* fun - and Far Harbour was fantastic, it was a return to the old ways of good questlines and proper interactive content.

[@CL-rm6sb]

The trick is to mod fo4 so it's super hard and requires not just running and gunning if you want to survive. Then the AI is more of a threat.

[@Hadgerz]

@@CL-rm6sb **Frost has entered the chat**

[@Ontik542]

Idk for other ppl I loved fallout 4 and mods fixed almost all the problems

[@TieberiusVoidWalker]

@@Ontik542 So for future reference never use mods as an argument since they weren't made by the developers and should be entirely optional.

[@tencraziest5697]

I never really got into far harbour because my fallout 4 experience was basically just working on sanctuary and going to a new place where I'd have to start all over in that regard killed my vibe

[@omperator6266]

Honestly if the game can give me a sense of being a space explorer that on the off time can mine to some music and every now and again I get to the random gun fight or whatever I'm cool with it. I'm not hyping it or thinking the game will be super great but I'm hopeful that the game will be interesting and maybe a better dip into a space faring game.

[@omperator6266]

@Kia El what do you mean?

[@fappydabear1774]

@Kia El absolutely no chance modders stay away. Why do you think that?

[@sheldmaster]

@Kia El why do you want modders to stay away from it?

[@omperator6266]

@@fappydabear1774 exactly i wouldn't be surprised that some people are working put plans for warhammer or halo mods coming and more after that

[@DoctorSess]

The vanilla game will be mediocre but with mods there’s a lot of potential. Especially since the modding community is finally being fully embraced (exploited) by Bethesda.

[@brandonow82]

Mass Effect is the best Sci Fi game ever

[@JL-XrtaMayoNoCheese]

Yes. Mass effect 1 is a masterpiece

[@troubledunos9469]

I'm sure Neil Druckmann will rewrite the story for sure. He will make Joel look bad, even though he is a loving father who was protecting his kid.the box art shows Allie large and a tiny Joel of course. It's funny cause Joel is a great character they nailed it, just to shit on it

[@LayLowOfficial]

*Neil Cuckmann

[@moonpresence9707]

You must not have played the first game at all if you think it wasn't extremely critical of Joel's actions.

[@Notarealchannelok]

@@moonpresence9707 You must have not played the game at all if you didn't grow to like Joel despite his flaws. It's called a flawed character archetype.

[@troubledunos9469]

@@moonpresence9707 I've played it 5 times, it depicted the lengths we would all go to protecting our loved ones no matter the cost, it was a story of love and thier relationship. Joel is flawed but who as a human is not? Can you say the same for any of the otjer characters in the last of us series? No because they are all flawed just trying to survive and do what they feel is right.

[@asyetundetermined]

Mfers are still crying about this shit? Lol wtf. Go outside.

[@Don-ds3dy]

The way Xp should work in moat games is "doing (x) makes you better at doing (x)", Not "doing anything gives you xp to buy a perk, it wouldn't make much sense if in an RPG you played as a wandering knight in shining armor for half the game but you could use all the XP you made to instantly turn yourself into a stealth archer build just by buying the perks.

[@diegocirac7314]

Isn’t that what Skyrim does? I mean to be good at stealth you have to be stealthy no matter if u have 20 skill points, u need the base skill level, don’t you?

[@SyndicateOperative]

@@diegocirac7314 Yes, that's how it works. Fallout 4 was the opposite in that you just earned generic exp, and what decided whether or not you could upgrade a skill was your total level. That was a total assblast.

[@1810jeff]

THANK YOU, you have no idea how mind numbing it is to hear the same buzz words that were used for no man's sky being brought up again with starfield xxxx explorable planets, realistic planet size and procedural generation. People don't understand that procedural generation has massive limitations and that exploration will be completed compromised. No amount of formulas and algorithms can tell the same quality stories that even novice writers can come up with.

[@thethe8955]

The main locations will be handcrafted "more than any ohther bethesda game" at least thats what todd says. I do not have the feeling that they take the generated plaets all too serios and just hope that the story telling, Charakter devolpment and the "universe" is good

[@1810jeff]

@@thethe8955 Sure but then why add them if they'll just be procedurally generated planets like no man's sky? It just seems so needless. I don't see why they would make such a big deal of something if they're essentially filler.

[@thethe8955]

@@1810jeff might be just like synt says maybe is the base buildin and so on importand. Or maybe just to make the whole space thing mor immersive😂 no no. I could imagine that the modders are already wet and exited to fill this planets up who knows

[@1810jeff]

@@thethe8955 The thing about that is that modders were always able to add new locations without the need of premade blank areas.

[@thethe8955]

@@1810jeff but not that easy, fast and much i would guess but i dont know how handy the engine 2 is for modders

[@sb17899]

of all the saddest words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these, "Synthetic Man was right again."

[@zurielschubert9410]

I actually like collecting resources, building settlements and weapon modding. Bethesda was never that good when it comes to story and rpg mechanics. They're good with making exploration. Yes, the 1k planets and you can land anywhere thing was VERY SUS like, yeah and F76 is 16x the detail of F4.

[@martingrayson]

At least No Man's Sky found their redemption arc. A very inspiring irl story of getting finding one's way back into firm solid ground.

[@benfletcher8100]

No Man’s Sky is really fun these days

[@Nightweaver1]

I have over 730 hours in NMS and while I will agree it's still not perfect, it's a lot more enjoyable than it was years ago. And all the updates are free: NO MTX or paid DLC. Yes if you play for as long as I do, all the planets and creatures and plants start looking the same. But the gameplay loop is still fun.

[@benfletcher8100]

@@Nightweaver1 When I first played it last year, I spent a good couple hours just zooming around in my ship lol the game can keep you entertained for a while

[@iminumst7827]

I've gotten into No Man's Sky recently. I find a lot of it quite disappointing but I still enjoy it enough to continue playing.

[@larryhuffman4326]

No Man's Sky is fun and I enjoy playing it very much. It has become one of my favorite games. I especially enjoy the periodic community events. The only gripe I have is they need to detach the tutoral from the main game. It can become annoying redoing the tutoral on every new save.

[@davis3138]

11:10 It appears that you could either purchase ship components, or craft them yourself. Here's to hoping that system will also be there for weapons. If you want to min-max and not have to do busywork, to gather resources and craft gun mods yourself, hopefully there will be a store that you can just directly purchase the specific mods that you want.

[@zmss8537]

nah, busy work is one of their core gameplay elements, without it the game is 3 hours max

[@ffxiisucks]

Or you could just visit the cash shop xd.

[@chanze555]

I never looted for crafting items in Fallout 4. I just purchased shipments with caps.

[@infernaldaedra]

@@zmss8537 BS 💩. You can't beat any BGS game in 3 hours without cheating or skipping 99% of the game. 👎

[@infernaldaedra]

You can just straight up steal ships too :)

[@exemida]

If you want to mine minerals and make ships play Space engineers it even has planets and those planets have seamless re-entry They are also freaking massive. You can build bases on land and in space. Have ship combat with other player factions and it has an economy now so you can buy and sell resources and ships. Did I mention the ships themselves are entirely customizable.

[@commandandconquer6303]

Space engineers is also pretty boring and there isn't any life on the planets, I've played the game for 2 months and it has a steep learning curve. Had to go through hours of tutorials on KZbin just to make a ship.

[@Cra2zedGob7lin996]

07:07 i have got some BAD NEWS!!

[@svenix2650]

My first thought after seeing the Starfield trailer; "This bi*** gonna be buggy son"

[@thorburnjschwegler]

Bugthesda 🤣 hopefully people won't be too hyped up just like with cyberpunk. so many games, so many failed and buggy launches. I'll wait until it's on sale plus the bad thing about it is it's only on Xbox series X/S, those are not easy to find, so we'll see.

[@svenix2650]

@@thorburnjschwegler I hope people use their brains this time but we both know whats gonna happen. And yeah my Computer is to old to run that game and im to broke to buy a XBOX lol.

[@thorburnjschwegler]

@@svenix2650 👍

[@sh0ker]

I disagree on a lot of the points on your video. I was also very disappointed with Fallout 4 after waiting many years for it. It seems like Starfield will fix many of the issue I had with Fallout 4 like more customizable character, silent character, allowing you to select a back story and having that backstory actually mean something. Also it seems like they listened to the criticisim from Fallout 4 settlement system and will allow you to hire characters managing your outpost instead of you doing all the work

[@derekbez3771]

Stupid?

[@libertyprime9307]

They more or less seem to be taking the best systems from earlier games. Like they're ditching the 4-choice system of FO4 in favor of real roleplay options more similar to FO3 or New Vegas. The skill system is a hybrid of FO4 where you pick perks, but you level them kind of like Elder Scrolls - by doing the thing over and over. I do hope they have an ammunition crafting and damage threshold system like New Vegas, which was really cool if you liked choosing specific ammo loads for specific enemy types.

[@keatonmccarthy8691]

Ok Todd

[@charliem5604]

"over 1000 planets" is such a red flag it's laughable. That combat also looks extremely lack luster.

[@trickledowneconomicsfail7127]

agreed on the combat but how is the 1000 planets a red flag? if you dont care about that side of the game, just stick to the handcrafted stuff.

[@charliem5604]

@@trickledowneconomicsfail7127 Red flag as in they're hyping it up to sound like the game is that massive when we all know it's really only maybe 10 planets that are actually interesting when the rest are just going to be barren resource dump planets. Just sounds like more false depth and something that some people will have unrealistic expectations over.

[@trickledowneconomicsfail7127]

@@charliem5604 wtf are you smoking? He very clearly said that most of of those planets will be bareen lifeless worlds for outpost building and resource generation. Even in the extended talk with pete hines, and todds ign interview; they state that if you dont care about any of it; you can stick to the handcrafted parts. so i dont know what you are complaining about.

[@charliem5604]

@@trickledowneconomicsfail7127 What's with the aggression? I said SOME are going to have unrealistic expectations, mainly those who look at what's face value from Todd's sweet little lies. Also haven't you heard the argument that more is not always better? Yes, you could avoid those 1000 planets if you so choose, but does having them make a better game? A lot would say no.

[@zakquinn5420]

It's an extreme red flag. Bethesda map size have been big but I wouldn't classify Skyrim, fallout or oblivion as planet sized maps. Making one hand crafted detailed planet would be impressive let alone 10, 100 or 1000 lmao. There just going to be vast boring planets

[@noobsaibotsbro123]

"So you better believe my expectation for Bethesda are pretty fucking low at this point" had me laughing so hard

[@jonxie221]

Correct

[@Dev_Samkrosh]

it did

[@F_Yale]

Last enjoyable Bethesda game was Skyrim. The fact that these clowns are still in business after the F76 debacle is quite the insight into gamer psychology.

[@trickledowneconomicsfail7127]

how is it at all surprising that they are still in business after fallout 76? are you braindead? The game was god awful and clearly had a tiny budget. So why would that put them out of business? Fallout 4 is for all intents and purposes the only bethesda game since skyrim.

[@Ghst-hl8fl]

Dudes comparing Ubisoft worlds to Bethesda worlds🤡 Acting like all 1000 planets will be empty

[@d0o0b-w1g]

How did that pay now? LMAO even LOL

[@DarkeningDemise]

The reason for the bad writing is Emil. He took over after Oblivion. Now he's the one who writes everything basically. They don't have a team of writers like they used to back in Oblivion and Morrowind. The only good story they did was Far Harbor in recent years and they had a different writer on that DLC. Hence why it was the highlight of Fallout 4. It felt like going back to the glory days of RPGs and Bethesda. Where you want to explore and be surprised and have choices. Emil did work on Nuka World however so that's not surprising that DLC flopped.

[@dancarter1745]

I don't think Oblivion was praised for its dialogue, anyway.

[@Freakingbean]

@@dancarter1745 it was praised for the stories.

[@Mourningstar-kc7ft]

Please tell me he lost his job

[@idiot_city5444]

I really hope you don't expect writers that worked on games 20 YEARS AGO to still be around with Bethesda. Lols

[@TheLWebb100]

@@idiot_city5444 I mean, we expect good writers though.

[@starwarsnerd1055]

I think Y’all are jumping to conclusions way to quick. I understand the skepticism around this game and this company. However it’s early gameplay they have a year to fix it so don’t trash the game when it hasn’t even come out yet . Don’t hate just to hate.

[@tearincottonpanties]

The last time we saw unfinished or rough game footage for a showcase that disappointed was halo. That ended up being delayed a whole year more. It’s understandable for ppl to feel worried or have doubts here

[@Rapunzel879]

It's not just the perfomance issues. It's the overall disappointment in the graphics, which are decidedly underwhelming. T his game will have been eight years in the making by the time it releases, it's next-gen only, and it already looks dated. The facial modeling is eneaven, ranging from super rough to kinda good. It's not amazing by any stretch of the imagination. Then there was the subpar gunplay. The AI looked stupid and entirely unaffected by you firing at them, the guns sounded bad, etc. The silent protagonist is a peculiar choice, of which I'm not a fan. Finally, there's the whole "space sim" stuff. Essentially, NMS's type of exploaration, which I've always found boring af. The collective concern for the game is absoutely warranted.

[@MrBoxen]

@@tearincottonpanties Yea, but Halo Infinite's campaign was better than 3,4,5's campaign. It was a good singleplayer game. As for multiplayer, I can't say. I've never been interested in Halo's mp like that, but from the little I did play, I had fun.

[@starwarsnerd1055]

@@Rapunzel879 Yeahh there are issues but they have a year to polish it so don’t rush to conclusions There’s a reason why it’s delayed

[@starwarsnerd1055]

@@tearincottonpanties yeah i agree but the fact that people are already calling this game trash like this guy really bothers me. They think the coding is something that easy or doesn't take time especially with these grand scale games. Be cautious but not hateful for something that still in development

[@rodolfo5651]

i love how critical you are of games. as gamers our expectations need to be high, weve got gta V, the bar has been raised. subscribed

[@Zodroo_Tint]

And we have to be critical of GTAV too.

[@brovid-19]

Here's my gripe with every one of the gripes you gripped about: How the hell are you surprised by any of this? How many times do they need to sell you the same game with a different skin before you realize, "this is Fallrim in Space" ?

[@ToxicallyMasculinelol]

aged like fine wine

[@leerockatansky]

I'm playing through RE4 right now and I have to say its a great game. It's engaging, it has a wide variety of player choices when tackling a situation, it has a very good inventory management system and it strikes a nice balance in tone. Things aren't always serious with some of the character's voice lines being funny and memorable. The RE4 remake will probably not be like this at all and probably be very similar to REVillage. I don't have very high hopes for the remake and no one else should.

[@johnnyflannigan136]

RE village is alot better than RE 4 so I hope you're right

[@AdamSmasherReal]

>if it doesn't have the tone of a campy B-movie, it will be bad Lmao

[@leerockatansky]

@@AdamSmasherReal I'm not saying that at all. I think that the goofy tone of RE4 will be missing from the remake which will therefore make the remake worse because the tone makes up a lot RE4's personality which makes it memorable. Not writing off the remake entirely because of the tone shift, just saying it will probably be worse.

[@chad_bro_chill]

My thoughts exactly . It could be the greatest game ever made, but it would still be a poor RE4 remake by virtue of removing the qualities that made RE4 special. Reminds me a bit of Super Paper Mario. A great game, but not a Paper Mario game.

[@russrandolph]

I enjoy your takes. Thanks for being brutally honest. We need more of that these days.

[@unknxwn888]

You mean hating because its not their style of gameplay? Because most of it sounds like it. I agree with some points and im also concerned, but facts are. We barely know this game. It probably releases bugged, combat seems mediocre as always, and im concerned about framerates. I don't get all the pre release hate thats all, only thing thats worse than that is preordering.

[@Spillow-C]

@@unknxwn888 because now there is a pattern about Bethesda games and this trailer exposed it very well AGAIN, if no one believed what Todd Howard said there is a reason. And btw he dont "hated" nothing here, watch the video till the end.

[@russrandolph]

@@unknxwn888 Having 40 years of gamming experience, I can recognize a pattern and a consistent decline in priorities, creativity and effort. I appreciate his opinion and the fact that he consistently calls out an industry that needs to have its priorities put in check. If you can't recognize the degrading state of the gamming industry then you're not really paying attention.

[@unknxwn888]

@@Spillow-C He stated his opinion, which was mostly negative call it hate or not. but most of the stuff he mentioned are Mechanics i couldnt care less, like "stupid Resource Mining, Stupid Crafting System etc" i do agree with the rest of the stuff tho, I'm aware BEthesda is.. known for certain things and i'm definetly not Preordering, but still. i'm owner of the Game pass not because of Starfield, but the games in general so i'm gonna try it myself no matter what.

[@unknxwn888]

@@russrandolph i do see a constant decline in quality games, who isn't. Just look at the "AAA" titles the last couple years in general. People are overhyping everything. The only thing im saying here is, he said "mining with a laser is boring" and is comparing it to the release of No Man Sky, but No Man sky failed on release because they couldn't hold onto the expectations they promised (also a Bethesda problem so lets see) No Man sky came pretty much empty. and in NMS you literally got nothing to do, not even a Story on release. You can't compare that and say it failed because mining is boring. Some people might enjoy that. but i do agree with your comment so i'm not gonna start something here, i just had to make that clear.

[@wile123456]

100% ranting 0% game design knowledge or analysis. Thank you KZbin for recommending a channel I never want tos ee again.

[@jeremywright9511]

Pretty much. Oh well back to bg3. Bethesda has been riding off of the success of skyrim for too long, it's clear whatever magic was there is gone now.

[@Giliver]

Unlikely What I expect from a Bethesda RPG is mostly decent gameplay with a bunch of bugs, I'm not looking for a masterpiece....because not every game has to be. Hell it's gonna be on gamepass so that immediately improve my personal first impressions. What's really gonna make this game amazing is the mods even the ones that pop out soon after launch fixing Bethesda broken launch. (Absolutely bound to happen)

[@soulofachristian8704]

These clowns are just spoiled brats looking to be heard and get attention, just like this never satisfied snowflake guy talking in the video

[@_shadow_1]

This. We don't need to overhype this game, otherwise we will be disappointed because perfect games don't exist, just games that are more enjoyable than other games. I am sure I would actually be a bit impressed with a few of the titles that they showed because I am not that hyped for them, I am interested sure, but I don't think that any of them is already predestined to be a generation defining masterpiece. I am actually hyped for starfield a bit because that is my favorite genre for fiction, though I am trying to still keep expectations at reasonable levels.

[@SyndicateOperative]

Personally, I'm not hoping it'll be perfect, I just want it to at least be bearable. Skyrim's quests weren't interesting, but they were good filler, and they made the game worthwhile. If they were even 90% of skyrim's quality, then I'll be happy.