Stern Landing Vessel (SLV) vs Conventional Landing Craft

In this video we explain the benefits of utilising a Stern Landing Vessel (or SLV) for heavy lifts in remove areas and unprepared beaches in comparison to Conventional Landing Craft (CLC) vessels.
For the latest updated video click here - • Stern Landing Vessel (...
To view more about Stern Landing Vessels please visit: www.seatranspo...
Learn more about our ship design and marine feasibility services at: www.seatransport.com
Follow us online:
Facebook: / seatransportsolutions
Google My Business: tinyurl.com/y5...

[@player55redcrafter8]

Looking at the bow, i couldn't help but wonder, does this thing have a hull mounted sonar?

[@charlesharper2357]

Where and what are the propulsion units that allow it to beach stern first?

[@GlenCychosz]

I want to see it also.

[@jakeatom4841]

Probably just azipods at the bow

[@harolddiaz4555]

WHERE ARE THE PROPELLERS?

[@mikea2363]

0:41 SLV: is both longer and wider Also SLV: Can carry more stuff that smaller and narrower landing ship Shocked_pickachu.jpg

[@danpiraino]

Kind of a reusable mini LST/LPH - I like it.

[@TheDustysix]

I found out about these from Military articles. USMC AirWing 77-81.

[@kentallard8852]

French are sorta doing this with their Engin de débarquement amphibie rapide, but that still operates from an LHD.

[@bodokoxfan]

So, where is the propeller?

[@TheKlink]

i was looking out for that too!!

[@paulmcmullan9931]

@@TheKlink Good question; where is the propeller. The only solution I can think of is using a jet pump with inlets and out lets at both ends of the ship!

[@txtallywhacker]

The main propellers are up front, also there are two shafts running through the hull to pods on each side of the stern where they connect to small pumps above water line with steerable nozzles underneath

[@TheDustysix]

Note to self: TEU is cargo container abbreviation 20 Foot Equivalent.

[@stormynatero1385]

These things would be great idea right.

[@timhoredtps]

Semangat,,, From Indonesia

[@TrangleC]

I don't get it. This video makes claims about this design being better, but then doesn't really explain how it actually is better. For example, the video shows that the regular landing craft lies on ground with the frontal hull when landing and then it shows the SLV doing the exact same thing, just backwards, saying it is somehow better, but not why and how it is better. What is the "Suction Effect" and why does one ship design suffer it and the other doesn't? Also, don't include cheesy "whoosh!" and "clank!" sound effects in a video like that. That makes it look childish and unprofessional.

[@shaenj]

Trangle, and others. You are suffering from you tube disease. Heaps of talk and no knowledge. It's too late now but that boat might very well have made me a very rich man 20 years ago.

[@TrangleC]

@@shaenj I asked a question and mentioned what I didn't understand after watching the video. So calling me ignorant kind of misses the point. If I would have seen that video in a board room meeting, I would have asked those questions too, so I don't think you can attribute this to "KZbin Disease". I should have more knowledge after watching the video. If you were involved with the project and it somehow went wrong, I'm sorry to hear that, but maybe the problem was that important people didn't understand the advantages of the design either?

[@williamhutchinson7]

1st it can be bigger more provision, a bow design travels through water much easier then a flat face design, flat going on to beach head is like jumping into very wet sand with gumboots on, u get stuck by the suction, the SLV has what looks like a slightly raised rear end and flat bottom end base which stops the lsv from actually beaching also propellers are not at the rear they further up the boat, so bigger, easeir through water, easier to depart from beach head, so that is how I understand th vid, hope it helps u some, but please don't take my word as fact, only from what I saw

[@johnhopkins6260]

ok... a bigger LCT... not rocket science. (how far up the Seine, Rhein, Thames can it sail?)

[@benwilson6145]

Who cares? its a LCT

[@IshijimaKairo]

..so conventional bad new good?

[@alexandersinclair9006]

Looks like it might work for civilians but in combat I would not want my propulsion that close to the enemy.

[@stormynatero1385]

Yup just a candy store for a Roman 🇮🇹 viking these days. Noted Mars DCXLIV 🤴♍🇺🇸🇮🇹🏴‍☠️🧹🦇🐢🔮.

[@CubiT0X]

Your site page really sucks !!! It seems like the owner´s relative got the job and did design it just for fun !!!

[@jccalvente]

To me it is a nonsense ship

[@benwilson6145]

you maybe need to look and listen to understand

[@charlesharper2357]

@@benwilson6145 No, they need to actually show how it works...where and what are the propulsion units that allow it to beach?

[@benwilson6145]

@@charlesharper2357 If you were able to use your keyboard then you would see three props on the stern set up so the blades are above the bottom, several ship exist , go and look at them.

[@charlesharper2357]

@@benwilson6145 Why don't they point it out, troll. Stop being an asshole...how would having recessed props stop bottom suction?

[@alexandersinclair9006]

@@benwilson6145 you seem triggered loser. You must be one of the rocket scientists that came up with this crap idea.