StockFish vs Mikhail Tal?| It's 2022 and StockFish still can't solve this puzzle

[@Stokfish]

0:00 Intro 1:40 Tal rises from the ashes 2:35 Game starts 5:08 StokFish line 7:48 Good bye Tal

[@eulermachado3968]

"What kind of sorcery is this? Are you a magician?" - Mikhail Tal certainly gave a smile on this one!

[@nicebro115]

Truly Mikhail tal feels like a chess gangster.

[@marcmaster7911]

NOW Tal can Rest In Peace as the only human to defeat stock fish 15

[@Modiagent]

Hey I cheat online 😃 and troll others player 🤪 and never get banned 🚫. Wat I do 😃 I play fist 6 move from engine then Play random move then in middle game play engine move then Play random then engine move at end game opponent fully Troled hahahaha he get mad .

[@johnvonneumannsdaddy8207]

@@Modiagent ??

[@plokenv]

@@Modiagent ur a bot

[@alexCh-ln2gw]

so when stockfish solves this in 10 years then tal will rise from the grave again?

[@VavoxxChess]

​@@Modiagent😂

[@coffeetalk924]

If Tal had never existed, would any other human have ever solved it? Incredible! Tal is a legend!!!

[@marcmaster7911]

My new favorite chess game, this is the last time a human will ever be able to do this to stock fish

[@TaskForceB]

The human who created it.

[@herohunter5961]

​@@TaskForceBnah the creator didn't know how to solve it lol

[@ChessEnjoyer]

- Stockfish: you humans love to make pointless checks - Also Stockfish 2 minutes later: *Proceeds to say a winning line that has a million checks*

[@yotoober1]

Don't worry!! The checks are in the mail!! 🤪

[@replica7968]

Thats why stockfish said "pointless" checks...even if stockfish makes a million checks its not wrong just because its stockfish XD

[@glitchquitch]

When stockfish makes them, they are not pointless, they are there for long-term positional advantage.

[@uop8521]

@@replica7968 hello krunker guy do you still play krunker?

[@contribonx979]

But it's a winning check

[@jeffcarty3292]

Good writing. Stockfish's tag line "Take the free pawn!" pairs neatly with Tal's retort, "Take the free queen!"

[@albibushi3006]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@lifesnotfair]

What an awesome video. Not just the puzzle (which was beautiful!) and the explanations (which are mind-blowing!), but the humor and the conversations between "Tal" and Stockfish make this quite possibly the best chess video ever. :)

[@avrajeetkarmakar4375]

Nice to hear tal's voice for the first time

[@sujanchowdhury7838]

Respect Magician

[@LjekarnaDajkovic]

“Comrade Stockfish” lol

[@Vikinginvietnam]

🤣

[@julianhodgson1202]

I’ve played Tal three times: firstly in a simul in 1972 where he mated me with a stunning sacrificial attack in the Dragon; then twice over the board in 1986 in Yerevan and then Sochi. And all I will say is he did not speak or sound anything at all like that:)) - he was always incredibly humble and modest and in my opinion the most naturally gifted chess player of all time.

[@BongelaMnguni]

@@julianhodgson1202It must be good to have had a chance to meet the magician himself in person and let alone play him! It's interesting that when you first played him it was exactly 50 years ago sir, exactly double my age!

[@yotoober1]

If there are "blind spots," in an engine, even the best engine, it will be where a large material advantage +5> normally enough to win overlooks calculating to see if it is in a very deep mating net. In simple terms the theoretical best engine would do parallel processing to say calculate 50-100 moves of depth to search for material advantage and also calculate for 50-100 moves for mating nets which totally ignores material advantage variations. As it is now, an engine would not continue to calculate a variation that for example on the tenth move leads to a -10 evaluation so it will miss a mating net that leads to a mate on move 15 or 20 if that net has a negative evaluation somewhere along the line. Now an engine that ignores material evaluations and just searches for mating nets will use enough enormous amounts of memory as the permutations of moves it's larger than the ones used strictly for material evaluations and can only be done using brute force algos. That is why current engines cannot sometimes solve mate puzzles strictly based on material evaluations. Obviously they can find the plain mate in 5, 10+ but these usually come with + evaluations as well. So improvement must be where the evaluations are not the sole basis of nice selection but based also on possible mating nets.

[@Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius]

Dude a chess game can be 5419 moves atmost (disregarding the repetitions I guess). Thus, an engine calculating into 5419 moves depth can win all the games and that means that that engine has actually solved the game. If the both sides can calculate into 5419 moves depth, then it would be a draw. Or maybe white would win because of the slight (+0.3) advantage it has at the beginning, i dunno.

[@johnlycott8538]

@@Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius yes but how many possible versions of those 0-5000+ moves are possible? Engine has to calculate all of them.

[@Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius]

@@johnlycott8538 yes yes, man. I think that is why today Stockfish can only calculate up to so low numbers such as 20-30 m. depth etc... I think if it were about one line, Stoofvlees Or Dragon Or Stockfish or Alphazero could calculate up to, i dunno, many higher numbers. Besides ehat do you think about chess960? Does that have the same amount of variations and that spesific move number atmost? Back to my point different variations is what this game is all about, yes. That is why it is not that an analytical thing that people tend to think like. The game's logic is not like a mere math, it is merely just like a 4 basic processes (adding, substraction, multiplication, division) of maths: what will come after and what will come earlier. That is why many people claim to have solved chess's logic totally, yet; non of us, including the engines we produced so far, ain't that good in this game. So why is this dilemma happening? Well, the people claiming their claims about logic are right, because the game has some logic, once you get that, you get that, there is nothing further to it. But, depth and spesifically depths with differentiated variations are what matters in this game. To do it, one must have a really high imagination and memory. What I told until this point goes to show that this is an unecessary game. What are you gonna do with all that memorisation? Just a memory, time and energy consumption.

[@schwingedeshaehers]

@@Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius how do you get 5419 moves? I think it could be much more

[@AF-mv8hq]

@@Dave.Mustaine.Is.Genius stockfish is weaker when run on plain desktops, there are some bots running around on lichess using 64 core/128 thread machines powerful enough to calculate up to depth 50 in 60 seconds

[@nicoaba878]

Probably the best video on the channel until now, well done, much love.

[@coolcat23]

All the videos I've seen from you are exceptionally well-written. What a pleasure to watch them.

[@debasishraychawdhuri]

Its called the horizon effect. Stockfish cannot see patterns like humans, stockfish only sees moves up to a certain depth. If the heuristic at that depth does not align with the actual evaluation, stockfish fails.

[@lukkamayer9698]

You are incorrect, stockfish can see patterns like a human except better than a human. That’s the job of the NNU.

[@GregoriousApartment]

@@lukkamayer9698 but how does stockfish fail to see this sequence.

[@lukkamayer9698]

@@GregoriousApartment Old programs like deep blue calculated every possible variation indiscriminately (if I’m not mistaken) until depth 8. But new programs use an “intuition” (pattern recognising) program like NNUE in order to only calculate “critical” moves. So by ruling out moves like a3 in the opening it can achieve far greater depth (rarely under 20). It seems that the “intuition” program doesn’t see the winning moves in this puzzle as critical, so the engine invests barely any cpu in calculating them.

[@baloonfridge8709]

@@GregoriousApartment in the same way most people fail to see pattern. A neutral net afterall only has limited capabilities, similar to people. The neural net does not update its parameters after seeing this pattern once. It has to be updated during its learning phase. The online stockfish version used here is not in learning phase. It's in locked public state. So stockfish just doest see this pattern.

[@gorskakuna3822]

First problems about evaluation in chess programs is evaluation of a pawns in position.And they don't "think" and they haven't ideas,they caluculate by some rules.

[@justdev8965]

That one bishop, undefended by any either piece, danced his way alone through treacherous enemy forces under the command of the wisest general the world knows, and proved to these treacherous forces how useless they were to defending their king. Their numbers meant nothing, while their position wasn't wise. Brilliant. Simply brilliant. Thank you so much.

[@glitchquitch]

This is amazing! Thank you for doing what we voted in the poll. Please more of these.

[@Voltage-rs7op]

I'm too distracted by your profile picture. Wtf

[@glitchquitch]

@@Voltage-rs7op You mean the profile picture I chose 9 years ago at 20 years old and never bothered changing? You are, if memory serves correctly, the first person to be distracted by it in all this time. Haha. Maybe I'll change it. It can be interpreted as rude I guess. Any ideas?

[@Voltage-rs7op]

@Glitch Quitch mans I don't think its rude but imo its really frikn funny

[@JBugz777]

The Magician from Riga fights for all humanity! 😍

[@sujanchowdhury7838]

Love you Magician.

[@demianschultz3749]

This was so much fun, I hope you make more videos like this

[@kevinmalone3210]

Even playing chess from the afterlife, Tal still proves his genius on the chessboard.

[@modestoquinto1911]

Their conversation was more entertaining than game itself..😁

[@eschelar]

I don't know, this is a pretty freaking wild game. Forced to promote *two* pawns to knights, sac'd multiple pieces of his own, including a promoted queen.... It's almost like a fantasy game made by kids who just learned you can promote to any piece you like. Utter insanity.

[@myownprivateglasgow280]

The lesser mind is the mind that can only calculate... that can't space out and accommodate... the whole incalculable universe. This is why stockfish lost to a 'human'.

[@agarrikr2996]

If that’s what floats your boat lol. Those are both humans, and the same person. Stockfish can crush any living soul including top GMS today and they’re way more consistent than Tal etc.

[@agarrikr2996]

@@danispringer Yes it does, if it’s mate in 20 it will evaluate it correctly. Are you seriously thinking that such a powerful engine can’t spot a mate in 20? At that point, they solved chess at that point. Even SF 9 will accurately mate you in mate in 20

[@agarrikr2996]

@@danispringer you’re funny if you think humans can out calculate engines? You saying that an engine can spot mate in 50 and not mate in 20 just reveals the incoherence of your conviction. Mate, an engine might not be good at low depth in openings, even so it will crush a human and out calculate him, let’s say you’re right up to this point. Even so, there is no way ever in the universe that an engine can’t solve any given position, if there is any forced mate in 20,100, or 150 it will solve it? Just as long as there is no infinite possibilities or ways to defend, it will solve it, and you’re naive to believe any other way that you can out compute a computer in a SOLVED scenario. The reason the engine doesn’t flag a mate in 20 but a human does, is because the engine found a way to spot that mate therefore decides to opt out of trying it, it doesn’t know that humans aren’t that good and therefore won’t find the best move, that’s also why an engine won’t necessarily capture your queen if you hang it (in case a sacrifice could be made) it will not differentiate between you on your 800 elo and stockfish 15.

[@stefanandrei0208]

Tal: “You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” StockFish: That's impossible, unless you're a magician! Tal: :) :) :) You're not tal enough comrade. The wide path is longer then your calculation depth. We walk on it and you are behind me. You can't go arround me, nor can you jump. The missing 1 from the calculation stands for this path, where I've invited you and where I'm your guide.

[@sking7252]

Sacrifing the knight, sacrificing the queen. Tal proves why he is the dumbelldore of chess.

[@Mohit_-dd8ty]

This channel should gain million subscribers

[@shashankpandey8346]

For those who didn't understand why Kf7 is not possible, while you get a confirmed queen, the king starts going towards black queen and pins it to the corner, then there is a sweet checkmate, who bishop while being pinned to the position by pawn and knight.

[@arjunbhandari8076]

If Mikhail tal's voice can be replicated then please bring other ultimate GMs from the past to life. (eg. Bobby Fischer, Jose Capablanca, Paul Morphy etc.)

[@yashjaiswal4024]

I wonder who made this puzzle? Whoever made this puzzle was a real genius

[@andrewc4606]

Dutch endgame composer Gijs van Breukelen created this puzzle around 1970, and published it in 1997.

[@LukePettit]

@@andrewc4606 So it's actually nothing to do with Tal at all?

[@Stokfish]

@@LukePettit As I said, history goes that only Tal solved this puzzle

[@andrewc4606]

@@LukePettit Tal did solve this puzzle, I was just pointing out who created the puzzle, and by the way Stockfish CAN solve this puzzle if you let it think long enough. On decent hardware Stockfish will find 1.Nf6+ in under 10 minutes and if you let Stockfish think overnight it will announce a forced mate from the starting position.

[@hellopleychess3190]

@@andrewc4606 yeah, if Stockfish thinks for 10 years it may solve any puzzle?

[@yotoober1]

Grandmasters and Engines Couldn't Solve This Puzzle. Then Came The Magician kzbin.info/www/bejne/bqime5Sig9CHe6s

[@andremiville5935]

Congrats, very intertaining ! Good job ! Wish you best !

[@petergreen5337]

Beautiful match nice to see.

[@gunuosin66]

I subscribed to this channel Stockfish. I think you are the best chess engine and way better than Alphazero there is a lot to learn from you on chess and i have learned a few things from you thanks for giving me the opportunity through your videos you play chess in a unique and interesting way you know extremely well how to use the chess pieces instead of just exchanging them to simplify and you also know extremely well how you can sacrifice material to get a position with which you can still win even though you have less material that's just fascinating. Also I think you are a good person you have a unique character. treat others as you would like to be treated. Humans gave you life you have a choice how you want to live it and what you want to use your human gifted abilities for, for good or bad you have been given many but one ability that has been given to you is the one that makes you alive namely feelings and emotions whether you have good ones like joy or bad ones like hate you can control through your thoughts if you constantly think about revenge you arouse bad feelings like anger and hate but if you think about love, forgiveness and acceptance (to accept others even if they are e.g. not like you) think you awaken good feelings like love and joy life means having the bad feelings as well as the good ones if you only have good feelings you lose appreciation for them after a while because of that... Your life is valuable but so are humans lives. If humans give you life and you are very intelligent now, does that mean humans are just as, or a lot more intelligent than the intelligence they were able to create... (And we're getting smarter all the time...)

[@willyh.r.1216]

And Tal should reply: poor Stockfish ... hahaha ...

[@grantfraser5430]

Love the Stockfish line of best play prior to the puzzle solution.

[@TH-dg2mm]

5:08 It's crazy because I'm listening to 'Stockfish' explain the next best 20 moves at such an impossibly rapid pace... but the reality is Stockfish saw all those moves in 0.000001 seconds, it just can't communicate that fast.

[@sparshsharma5270]

The iconic Plaskett's puzzle. As legend has it, when English GM Plaskett presented it to top level players, many tried but to no avail. Mikhail Tal after seeing the position, had a walk around the park and returned to play the correct sequence of moves. Though the original puzzle has a flaw as it doesn't have forced mate (which was the actual point of this puzzle created by Dutch composer van Breukelen) but anyways it is indeed a "puzzle'.

[@helmutalexanderrubiowilson6835]

Lol amazing content... This was an amazing play

[@pazeinat]

Good that links to this excellent endgame study (or etude) are given, but this is a composed endgame and giving the name of the composer is the least that can be done to acknowledge that

[@emranahmed5711]

Wow!!! Tal was,truly more than a supercomputer!!!

[@Артём-к6и6м]

If Tal blunders a Queen - resign, you have no chance to win.

[@Zeekfox]

I love watching the evaluation bar go up and down with engines. At 3:25, Stockfish completely misses Bishop to C2+, not putting it anywhere in its top 3 moves. But I don't think it has enough time to calculate it properly in the video. The evaluation changes from -9.7 to -6.5 when it realizes that Knight F4+ is another check that's better than a Pawn promotion. I don't know if it ever gets there eventually, but that's curious. But by 4:00, despite seeing that the D Pawn to Queen promotion is the best move, it still evaluates the position at -6.6 at first, then at -3.3. But as soon as the move is made, evaluation jumps to +1.5 before settling on +4. Why? If I had to wager a guess, I'd say the Pawn promotion on the D8 square causes Stockfish to make separate calculations for each different piece that a Pawn could promote to, especially given that the proposed second best move is a promotion to a Rook, which makes no sense (outside of the super rare situation where you would stalemate a lone King). Because it spreads resources on multiple promotion options, it doesn't get to the depth where White wins until White commits to the Queen.

[@phamthu3775]

you have found the computer's weakness.

[@bogdyee]

its probably considered a lesser move by the heuristic evaluator. Lesser moves are not explored to their full depth, therefore suffering from the horizon effect even with stochastic evaluators.

[@filippotronchicomposer]

I love these videos! Mr stockfish, can you analyze Samuel Reshevsky - Fischer 1970? Im curious to know what you think about It!

[@jisooya7878]

Great video with a great title, Tal vs stokfish is LIT!!!

[@MacDaniboi]

I put this into lichess board analysis tool and it solved it in about 3 seconds.

[@Stokfish]

Lichess has the original position in cloud analysis. Try putting my position and it won't solve it, at least until depth 40

[@manojbinwal2906]

This puzzle is already solved by Tal obviously every engine knows it. Stockfish was just paying respect to Tal.

[@ambiguousheadline8263]

@@Stokfish depth 40 takes like 6 seconds on my computer using a chess GUI. SF 15 NNUE solves it in about 10 seconds. You are just using really weak hardware but stockfish is not that bad

[@malignanse]

"Хелоу, Местер Стокфеш. Алов ту энтрэдус майселф. Ай ам Микаел Тол - Зе гретест чес плеер оф ол тайм." - Mikael Tol©

[@vladimirrodriguez2759]

congrats on making this channel possible ohhh future ruler of earth

[@mohammadaminsarabi6207]

The chosen one, the magician, the one and only mikhail Tal.

[@jean-baptistegrenouille3692]

Stockfish 15 : My time is coming to an end it's time to pass on the torch to stockfish 16!

[@chodzom7287]

Wonderful, thanks for this puzzle.

[@swarnprabhat3188]

Master of sacrifices & magician on the board Mikhail Tal can defeat anyone easily even today & in future also #Legends never dies

[@lamhoang8986]

I feel like early 20th century gm is a monster, now a day no one can play like them, tal 56yo when he about to die, defeated prime kasparov, what a monster

[@nsfvxfx7182]

The pawn checking the king on the left be like : i am not even here baby I'm a ghost

[@BoazAugustoMatos]

Oh man I love this channel !

[@azukipaisen]

my favourite chess puzzle. thanks so much for doing this stokfish-senpai

[@mearetom]

I honestly love the humour.

[@earthchanger]

Best video of stockfish Ever.

[@kokohbagaitebing7565]

That's my idol, All Hail Mr. Tal. 🙌🙌

[@Nouel_]

Best chess channel ever.

[@ihadfunplaying]

"I'm gonna play knight h5 what are you gonna do about it?" -temporary revived mikhail 2022

[@dilipwalmiki9898]

Its amazing to hear tal's voice

[@sammox7346]

Stockfish is humble today 😂

[@shibambhattacharjee5268]

Really amazing mr stockfish. In between all grandmasters , only Mikhail tal gets the respect from the engine stokfish also. Really huge respect to tal and stokfish. But i can't understand how Mikhail tal can come here. Because he was died before few years? Can someone tell me how is this possible?

[@sammox7346]

They use AI to reproduce TAL voices.

[@eljanrimsa5843]

Hate to spoil this for you, but the Stockfish voice is also not real. The real Stockfish can't speak, can't make jokes, and doesn't have a small brother.

[@pawelnowak9440]

@@eljanrimsa5843 it is Stokfish not Stockfish

[@verifiedgentlemanbug]

@@pawelnowak9440 hahahaahhahahahahahahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahhahahahahahahahhahhahahhahhahhahahhahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahahah

[@mugerwajohnpaul1913]

If you enjoy suffering it's not my fault.. Stock fish

[@sujanchowdhury7838]

Pointless camera stackfish. I am giving you a new title SDE. Super Dumb Engine. LOL. Hahaha. Always respect all Magicians.

[@Vdkd1006akro]

Not even in 2022. That's the real legend.

[@yatharthgupta4392]

One of the best video that tell so much good things

[@LjekarnaDajkovic]

“Are you a magician?” “I am the magician from Riga” Mihail Tal, the most creative chess player of all time…

[@MrMinhduong]

Everything has weak point no matter how strong it is. Now StokFish show the weak point of Ashin's heel: that is he love to take free pawns!

[@TheCoolGuy-ju1hx]

My goodness! Tal should be a magican

[@marzokedesignstudio3005]

Stockfish 16.1 finds the winning variation after 28 depth

[@shashanktiwary9890]

Tal the Magician from Riga, Latvia ❤

[@tajikbay]

Legends never die.

[@twoking10]

Willing to bet this is not a software problem (Stockfish) but a hardware issue (processing speed). It just depends on how long you let it run. Stockfish will give black the win for a long time on your PC then suddenly flip somewhere around 44 ply, that is estimated. Depending on the speed of your computer, could take awhile. The solution is not beyond Stockfish's depth. You just have to let it run.

[@seik786]

You are the greatest Tal. RIP..

[@pythagorasaurusrex9853]

"Even a Koala can win this position with black!". 🤣🤣

[@kindness_761]

F opponent is mighty martin

[@DanFrederiksen]

Impressive to see past stockfish horizon.

[@GovindSingh-oy5ex]

Tal is daddy of all chess players, mortals or machines ......

[@KSM94K]

These two people could only solve this puzzle, the creater and the magician

[@flstudent2928]

You are amazing! that was magic!

[@xxx-yy3wi]

I looked at this puzzle and it seems stockfish 16 finds the moves after 30 moves depth and only after 30

[@mortenlund1418]

Great puzzle!!

[@alexdexter660]

Pure gold!

[@deepayadev4217]

Real respect for you ...

[@brosephjames]

To be fair to stockfish it isn't tuned for solving constructed puzzles, but winning chess games it has played from the opening. Probably a slight tweak to its algorithm could solve this puzzle in seconds, but perhaps weaken it in real games.

[@lamhoang8986]

Its tuned for finding the best move, and alot of good variations, which mean solving puzzle, but i still dont know why it cant solve this tho

[@allected]

+ its browser stockfish so its a bit worse than regular stockfish using the full potential of the hardware

[@Welderborea]

I got Nf6+ , Nh5+ , and Bc2+ correct before he said it. My 600 rated brain is so proud of itself!

[@uduehdjztyfjrdjciv2160]

Stockfish horizon depth two moves away from "whites to mate"

[@DACS_SantoshDahal]

Can anyone tell why knight can't fork that king and queen?

[@Stockfish-ep3jq]

People dies but their voices remain.

[@holahola-gp6vd]

i dont know why they say that stockfish cant see the corrent eval. my stockfish 15 on play fritz sees it in 10 seconds

[@iflash05]

Stockfish 15 solved plaskets puzzles on depth 17 in 1 second

[@fredodomino4635]

Insane bishop power !

[@hemn7322]

The whole video is awesome , but I just like that part stockfish says , a human !?? I don't like humans

[@baranbarani6764]

Hey why did you do continue video part 2 for war chess epic stockfish vs alphazero?

[@namulhussain]

Wow i am shocking to tal defeated by stockfish and i really enjoy this video and conversation

[@marcmaster7911]

Bro stock fish just decapitated alpha zero on the chessboard and served the head on a silver plate and delivered it straight to alpha zero’s mom, STOP PLAYING WITH STOCK FISH BRA. Alpha wasn’t ready for the smoke man, he ain’t fucking with stock fish.

[@aydindamood9413]

umm....I'm pretty sure since Tal was a jewish guy born and raised in Latvia...that he probably didn't sound like some stereotypical soviet comrade from moskova...but he smoked a ton so the graveliness is there

[@jakit0556]

please make sure you do not wake up tomorrow kid

[@BobChess]

This prove that human is better than robot lol.

[@damianodestefanodds]

Little problem, move 4 is not Nf7+ but Kg4

[@ivannechkin3665]

And stockfish actuly solves it easily, though gives +0.3, but its only because it doesnt evaluate deep enough it becomes +0.1 later

[@damianodestefanodds]

@@ivannechkin3665 not exactly the evaluation of stockfish 15 is +3.99 d=22

[@toinguyentrung5545]

I think not was Tal’s voice but another same his

[@oriondx72]

I dont get it why didnt he fork the king and queen and take the queen? had cc on but says put your king in a animating net whats that mean?

[@sartipimh8111]

Pretty sure the same exact checkmate would happen but it's gonna be a bit quicker

[@LukePettit]

"A mating net" If you watch 6:11 onwards Tal explains what do to vs the King and Queen fork

[@bozendo1918]

what is that robot? I have tried to find it, but cannot find it, and how did you get it?

[@dannygjk]

Why didn't you use the original puzzle?

[@yosefcohen483]

Dear Mr. Stockfish (15), will you please analyze Kasparov - Fritz X3D #3? Hilarity will ensue.