Supreme Court Upholds Daughters’ Right To Parental Property Even If Father Had Died Before 2005

[@arunshankar8290]

But if the father has loans to payoff but he died . Will the daughter or the son have to pay it off.

[@ts0128]

Both as to share

[@yoyo946]

u have to pay it

[@arunshankar8290]

@@yoyo946 so if it is gain then it should be equal .but if it is loss only a perticular gender should pay it ? Is that what you want to say?

[@VerSioNY100]

Clear your debts and go to nirvana.. so that your children could live peacefully

[@Nigoto_Saituri]

@@yoyo946 FeMiNaZi

[@srinivasdogiparthi2117]

Giving rights on property is very good. This law is there in Andhra from 1980s. But these laws never talk abt responsibility? Daughters and there husband's family ready to take responsibility as well of parents? 🤔

[@abcdpqrs1281]

@Shanaya Shanaya we're talking about this case, not previous.

[@Himanshu-pg5cv]

It is same in Haryana.

[@mdkumarz]

Andhra too only applicable for Hindus?

[@ujjawalx7460]

Is that a question. Daughter always takes care of parents.

[@priyabora9889]

The sister marries a rich family,, he brother is poor.. She never comes to her fathers and mothers house.. Never took care of her parents. How can now she ask for property.. All done was by her brother who is poor, and took care of parents all life.. She never cared for asking about money if we need to buy medicines.. So will this law applicable for such Greedy and selfish daughter

[@chhayakant8944]

This condition only applies to the situation if the girl( sister) had love marriage but it can't be possible through arranged marriage because as such conditions can't be a part of arranged marriage as "having similar status and wealth of the groom's family " is a parameter in most of the arranged marriage. So the condition of brother is poor and sister is rich is somewhat not possible in most of the cases . But it can be possible that after the marriage the girls paternal family get poor due to some reason but the possibility is still less but it is possible . In such case there is a provision that if the Father or mother or the property owner is alive he/she can write a "will" and signed in that "will" mentioning disqualification of the daughter from the property. The Hindu succession act only applies in case of unfortunate demise of the property owner ( father/mother) it can't be applied if the property owner is alive so your arguments are lacking the basic facts . Your argument is totally a absurd hypothetical situation.

[@tusharjadhav2931]

More hatred towards female will be added.

[@NidzShah-ps6kr]

Well how can people who have tremendous ancestral property to pass on be particularly poor. Doesn't make sense.

[@priyabora9889]

@@chhayakant8944 Will A power of attorny works even if both parents are not alive

[@ujjawalx7460]

What a made up story cmon story teller you need to do better.

[@sundalkar]

People need to understand this is only applicable to ancestral property and not the property earned by their parents by their own money. For self earned property parents still have to make a will.

[@thecutebuddingcrafter3559]

Will her husband's family accept her parents.....gv due respect.....thy dont even drink water from their daughter house...fearing repruction s.........husband will enjoy wife,s money....and more dowry deaths are going to happen....in the NAME OF LAW.

[@tarunsb9592]

Boon for land mafia.... File case by the daughters of previous owner

[@vineetgupta4391]

sharp observation.....now brokers will be active and if it's going to apply retrospective then gods know what problem and no of legal cases we should expect

[@bimalkumarnayak1711]

My mom is ready to fill affidavit 😂

[@sanjeev2554]

What about muslim and Christians? Why aren't they protected by law

[@Nigoto_Saituri]

They don't want their women to be protected since they have a male dominated religious ideology. Edit :- The only way they offer "protection" to their women is by killing the lover of their daughter/sister if he belongs to a different religion.

[@zohaibamir858]

@@Nigoto_Saituri For you small ass mind which criticize any relegion without having proper education. Islam gave parental property right to Women 1400 years before and it is still practiced in every muslim country under sharia law.

[@Kumar-fg1cj]

there religious boardwill decide ...

[@coderYT1]

@@Nigoto_Saituri very true, we saw what happened in Teen Talak case

[@makeyourlifeeasy9619]

In case of muslims , muslim daughters will get 50% of what their brother gonna get like If boy gets 50 ruppes then his sister will get jst 25 ruppee But according to this law Hindus , including sikhs, jains here daughter and son will get 50-50.

[@karn5674]

I hope ucc comes early and muslim women also get this right

[@jeet4134]

Nowl the mullahs will give u hateful comments 😂

[@jeet4134]

But UCC will come and their will be no sharia law in india

[@mohammedateeq4387]

the Muslim women get the right to Parental property by the religious law itself.

[@coderYT1]

@@jeet4134 mulla dislikes🤣

[@Nigoto_Saituri]

@@mohammedateeq4387 And the man is allowed to do Halala with her and give her triple talaq on his will. So much equality, lmfao.

[@newspirit7624]

MAN AND WOMEN HAVE EQUAL PROPERTY RIGHT ON PARENTAL PROPERTY. IT MUST BE IMPLEMENTED STRICTLY .THERE MUST BE A AWARENESS CAMPAIGN ON THIS.

[@battulavenkatesh6366]

If father has loan debts then daughter share those debts ? Or simply took property 🤔

[@sagarjadhav6568]

Yeah equal rights with equal responsibilities.

[@nandishreddy9612]

@The Alchemist what if brother is poor man and daughter is married to rich man?

[@nandishreddy9612]

@The Alchemist do you think its justice. if father had property irrespective of daughter situation (if she is rich by having property also) can claim. but son's who has to take care whether its a loss or gain.

[@keshav2902]

It's for Hindus only 🙄🙄🙄 Equal rights ka majak hai

[@harinderjitsinghdhaliwal5933]

Bhaai kuch bhi mat likho musalmaano ke law mein jb tk saare bache agree nhi krte parents will ke sath , tb tk vo will apply nhi ho skti. Yeh amendment hindu law ki he kyunki ye law hinduo ne khud ke liye banaya tha .

[@harinderjitsinghdhaliwal5933]

@Rohit Srivastava Bhaai menne ussi vajah se kha muslims ka alag law he.... To equal rights ka koi matter nhi uthta .

[@words007]

Before fighting, understand this in indian culture, about 95% married daughter will never want a share of fathers property in case of having a brother. Those daughters have their own property with their husband. This is why people are ok with either one. Either daughter gets share or not. They are getting it one way or the other in the form of their husband's property. In case the wife demands property from her father the supposed Sister of her Husband will want to share the property of the Wife's husband and the chain continues. There are exceptions everywhere. Also the point about "if the father has debts and property. Then either of 2 things can happen 1) brother and sister share property and loan 50-50 equally. 2) sister forfeits the right to property and loan.... or brother forfeits the right to property and loans with mutual agreement.

[@insearchof9090]

Very informative sir. 👍

[@rajasekarpandian6933]

In TN we have already brought a law for that..we did that more than 15 years ago...😀😀

[@rv3330]

Andhra has also this law in order since 1980's

[@Himanshu-pg5cv]

In Haryana too

[@arvindpanwar7482]

brother that is Tamil nadu not north indian satate

[@Himanshu-pg5cv]

@@arvindpanwar7482 you moron.. Haryana also have this rule from many years. And as far as I know, Haryana is in North India.

[@amitkushwaha5491]

As a matter of fact it is discriminating....it will now encouraged lakhs of new ownership cases..

[@ujjawalx7460]

No will solve it.

[@harinderjitsinghdhaliwal5933]

Only& only *RAVISH KUMAR* reported this incident last night on primetime. All others were busy in emotional manipulation.

[@thelivingworld18]

What about the marriage time dawry and marriage expandautire spent by brother

[@anindyadutta4228]

Dawry is against law

[@thelivingworld18]

What about the marriage expandautire

[@sundalkar]

Better get a contract signed from sister against the amount spent on wedding.

[@sandeepkumar-pn6zz]

@Sourabh Ghosh girl has a right na buddy .... If she says my marriage has to be very rich...

[@thelivingworld18]

Is it for all the religions

[@thecutebuddingcrafter3559]

If women share equal property rights, will she as a family take care of her parents health and financial support.

[@rishabhvarshney6396]

Yes it's her duty to take care of parents ..

[@KiranKumar-wt2oo]

now guys can take dowry legally and they will focus on some rich Girl :-)

[@niharranjanbehera5639]

Wrong decision taken by supreme court

[@priyabora9889]

This new law is good but there are also kind of daughters, who marries a very rich family, her in laws are very rich. But her brother family is poor. What he only has the land and giving the land for rent he lives his life. So if the sister comes and ask for property what will brother do? How will he live if the rent stops.. But the sister is already rich and brother is poor? Is the law aplicable??

[@MayTheRighteousWin]

if she wants to claim her right then its her right but this can be setteled on moral grounds out of court.

[@tusharjadhav2931]

Woman: can inherit Parents + Husband's property. But cannot lose her parents property to ex husband. Man: can inherit Parents property + Parent Debts. Once in Divorce, man will lose his legit property to his ex- wife. Kya karigiri hai, Subhan Allah yeh insaan ne toh kudrat ko hi badal diya.😎😎😎 Enjoy Domestic Violence cases.

[@sejalpatil5841]

@@sulsur4151 Yes. And man doesn't give birth. They don't know go through any pain. While a wife has to take leave for maternal purpose. They are the ones who feed the baby in the initial stage.

[@avinashtiwari200]

wow..good totaly one sided decision.....can inherit parents property and can take husband property....where's equality....wat a hypocrisy

[@vineetgupta4391]

now the so called feminist will become silent and blind

[@KiranKumar-wt2oo]

Haha right

[@mohammedsadhiq5567]

Those who are commenting like its bias and why only to hindus....etc should understand that the judgement was given on the basis of "Hindu act"..court has said what hindu act law on inheritance....And Other religious boards too have their inheritance law from long time and and they are supposed to follow that!

[@abhishekunni2433]

This should have been a general law. You have a child or children, then you can't discriminate on what you give to them on the basis of gender. If they are drunk or Anti-social elements, then reject them, but not on the basis of something natural.

[@Rishabh-Dev]

Fir toh husband ka wife ki property pe bhi right hona chahiye. 🤣🙏🏻

[@Mansheeth]

Better watch in 1.25speed

[@Nigoto_Saituri]

@Dheeraj Speed badha loge, quality to tatti hi rahegi

[@TKV007]

Irrespective of caste, creed and religion all women should come under its purview . India is a Country of its Citizens.

[@abhishekyadav2429]

Muslim also

[@nikhilsahay2]

It's comes under hindu civil law Until UCC passed it can't be done

[@hasnat9545]

@@nikhilsahay2 In which part of world UCC exists?

[@myyoutubecontent2024]

Now we can take dowry legally 😋 Thank you SC ❤

[@abcdpqrs1281]

@Dwan Sangma same goes to the man. Why would any man marry a woman who demands that he earns more. We should make a law arresting women for demanding that, "men should earn more or we won't marry."

[@myyoutubecontent2024]

@@abcdpqrs1281 She is a stupid feminist ....dont reply bro..... Stay safe

[@abcdpqrs1281]

@Dwan Sangma I'm talking about hypocrisy here. If men are fools for marrying a woman who demands more money, then women are also fools for paying dowry, but asking dowry is punishable.

[@ujjawalx7460]

@@abcdpqrs1281 what an absurd statement. What more can you quantify it.

[@ANANDkumar-hc7uf]

For "hindus" only please read the judgement carefully

[@ujjawalx7460]

Please read all other laws carefully. Then come back.

[@ujjawalx7460]

Indian succession act.

[@muralidharasharma6429]

What if the father has written a will to give his wealth to son, or daughter or a temple instead of eqaually distributing?

[@pushkarmarathe1033]

This decision will apply if a father/mother has not written a will

[@amitmalik9935]

Great Step towards an equal India

[@MonkeyDLuffybiharewale]

a good move but i wonder why only hindus? is india only for hindus? we need UCC urgently. a law should be equal to all. if it is only for the hindus then i want a hindu rastra. no kidding.

[@r.b.8018]

Hindus Jain Sikhs. Muslim has muslim personal law. They have their own laws.

[@mohammedsadhiq5567]

The judgement was given on the basis of hindu act..hindu act is applicable for hindus, in sharia law also, women has the right for fathers property.

[@DSMary-fr3cb]

anyone tell about christen share about property to women please

[@r.b.8018]

Mohammed Sadhiq So u want Sharia Law in India???

[@mohammedsadhiq5567]

@@r.b.8018 this law is already under muslim personal law and has the constitutional rights!!!

[@pratikchaudhari2344]

My materal grandfather died before 2005 without will. Now, according to this law, my mother has legal right over ancestral property of my materal grandfather. I want to know the share my mother is entiled to? Is it 50%?

[@desibarber2227]

No, read SC judgement properly from google

[@kartheekbaddula5944]

I think this would create a difference/divide in a family of brother and sister relationship. And also more hate between their grandchildren. Lawyers will get more cases and earn more. Have to wait and watch.

[@vinodkumarsandani4618]

well said

[@kartheekbaddula5944]

@Shanaya Shanaya Money can destroy any good relationship. I have seen/read brothers, Father n son, Mother n son having disputes coming to property and also killing others for property. Now adding daughters too will increase the disputes between them. Have to see the increase in legal cases exactly after a year.

[@delicacies...8745]

Exactly, we need to protect our family values

[@sundalkar]

@@kartheekbaddula5944 can't deny that this won't increase disputes as this is a new concept. But that is also caused because of denial of rights till now. Peace cannot be attained always at the expense of one party. Plus this applies only to ancestral property and not self earned property. Parents can always favour the child who deserves more with self earned property rights.

[@sanketbadjate6320]

If brother's love is on the property more than his sister then I would say it's better to have no brother rather than having a selfish brother.

[@prashannikumbh4659]

A very wrong decision taken by supreme court.

[@mohammedsadhiq5567]

Explanation?

[@yanat7934]

Idiotic move Also make a rule if father is a loan defaulter and has a huge debt make sure that it is divided among both the son and the daughter I personally believe it is very bad move. It promotes Dowry A father has a daughter and a son. In right marriageable age the father will try to look for a suitable son in law for their daughter. And as the matrimonial sites shows they go beyond their own family income to search for one ( family income 10 lakhs p.a ..... looking for above 50 l.p.a ) Therefore daughter gets both husband's share and her father's share... There's no such scope in Son's case. Therefore son will try to make it up by taking as much dowry as possible The above case is not applicable for all individuals but a majority in rural areas where dowry is still the norm Don't come barking in with heated stuffs If you wanna debate make it a rational one

[@janmejayraj8687]

Agree, this will encourage dowry more

[@vibhanshuvaibhav335]

@@DramaTV2613 hehe good joke divorce in india is still a foreign think it take atleast 70 to 80 years of work

[@nikhilsahay2]

Same goes for his wife

[@yanat7934]

Strange.....so many people are giving opinion which fixes the fault but not the problem I talked about dowry being wrong and this move promotes dowry The fact that People are saying the son will also get dowry from his wife's side means these people in a way are supporting the dowry move Now that is strange and interesting

[@vibhanshuvaibhav335]

@@DramaTV2613 ever heard of alimony stfu why do women get less sentence then huh there are dowory law to protect her but what is for men why only women get abused in a relationship

[@vikneshramesh3529]

I have one doubt guys.. With out knowing... Without my mom's knowledge... Even with out her signature Her 4 brothers share property among themselves (mom's Father property) property with my grandfather signature... In 2010 And my grandfather died in 2017 Can we claim case against right... Plz tell .... .... They didn't give anything to my mom....

[@hypercubergumi]

If a daughter is born before 1956 then can she claim father's property?

[@makeyourlifeeasy9619]

What type of country we r living with inequality? Hindu(sikhs,jains) daughters will get same amount of property as their brothers gonna get like 50-50 But in case of muslim daughters , they will get 50% of what their brother gonna get like Are we really living in democratic country where everyone is equal?? These laws tell some different story.

[@adityasinha8088]

aisa muslim ka personal boardlaw hai na isliye problem hota hai , isliye govt ko ucc lana chahiye

[@sagarjadhav6568]

Well we can't "hurt" Muslims sentiments right.

[@ankitsen1998]

Nope

[@hasnat9545]

FYI, Muslim Women get property rights They get inherent property 3 ways : As Daughter As Wife As Mother But It's kinda complicated... To solve the issue "Algebra" was born Here's the full details : www.makaan.com/iq/legal-taxes-laws/examining-a-muslim-womans-right-to-property

[@makeyourlifeeasy9619]

@@hasnat9545 i know they get property rights, but how much??? Its not equal u idiot

[@ankitsen1998]

Wow daughter can now inherit both fathers and husband's property

[@sagarjadhav6568]

Lol didn't thought about it that way. 🤔😅😂

[@poonamshinde9597]

So a son can inherit his father's and wife's property.. Gyani insan

[@gauravdubey157]

@@poonamshinde9597 exactly!😂

[@k.bhavithkumar5708]

@@poonamshinde9597 no.he cant inherit his wifes property.

[@poonamshinde9597]

@@k.bhavithkumar5708 so how a wife can inherit her husband's property unless he signs it of to her? Kindly explain.

[@edmund1397]

What about Muslims?😏

[@sagarjadhav6568]

They're lol.

[@criptik5208]

If they change right to property then they need to change many things for egs before and after marriage and many other things. Just like ecosystem if you change one thing whole ecosystem get disturbed till everthing is not changed with it.

[@saiya8615]

Wasn't this already there??

[@insearchof9090]

Don't debate man. Our sisters are made of gold. They never ask property of brother. It's set in our society.

[@KiranKumar-wt2oo]

Not everyone thats why so many cases

[@tusharjadhav2931]

With great powers , Comes responsibility.

[@desibarber2227]

What a law this is? !!.Daughter gets property right over husbands share and now under Father's share too..What will sons do??.And by the way fathers often take heavy loans for Daughter's marriage and Education... I hope the burden of Loan remittance should also be equal for daughters..

[@ujjawalx7460]

He will get from his wife's share 😋😋😋

[@FlowerMe24]

Anybody please tell me can a daughter claims fathers property after the death of her father? After she has said she doesn't want to tke any share before his death. Please

[@Sooraj-qi2bo]

You mean the same Dowry system, but this time legally🤝🍻what abt the daughters who ran away with some tiktok kinda guy? She shud be also accepted with half the property as well? And how abt the marriage custom? All the expenses will be taken care by the grooms family?? So a father who got 2 or more daughters should be extra wealthy to tc of dowry,marriage expenses and above all to share his wealth as well....🍻🤝

[@shoban123]

Wrong decisions

[@nutanfulmali3798]

People are not appreciating this judgement and actually comparing between Hindu and Muslim. Terrible. In Christian and Muslim there is already daughter has parental property rights before centuries.

[@nishantbhadoria860]

Well then I must say ur not very well aware of the law. A Son can have 75% of the property but a women can only have 25% of the property if the said property intestate..... We are talking abht the equality law doesn't need lecture on abrahmic laws

[@Nigoto_Saituri]

No one cares.

[@Himanshu-pg5cv]

This rule has been there for years in Haryana.

[@niteshpassi8763]

Ye kiya hindu ke liye baki ke liye koi nai😠

[@nikhilthomas19]

Hindu undivided family is a seperat person according to income tax law ! Just because it has a hindu tag doesn’t mean it’s what u think it is ! It is also a form of business enitity which has exemptions and reliefs ! 🤣 with your logic christian and muslims would want Christian undivided family rules and Muslim undivided family rules etc ! Just google what it is before commenting

[@mohammedsadhiq5567]

@@shivamsinha2154 brother,the judgement has given on the basis of hindu act..they have said what hindu law say about the property rights.

[@KiranKumar-wt2oo]

now we can take dowry legally and will focus on some rich Girl :-)

[@tilak231]

Too much music, too less info!

[@ankushsharma4234]

Is it applicable for all or hindus only?

[@mohammedsadhiq5567]

Brother...in every thing u have a communal angle ?.. in sharia, Muslim daughter gets the share of her father already. What does hindu law say about this ?

[@vineetgupta4391]

Is this not inequality and against Feminism as now Daughter has two rights (right in father's and husband's property) as compared to son which has only one right (right in father's property) .. plus does daughters can now be legally forced to share father's Debt/ bad loan also .....if in case daughter is housewife (not earning ) becomes liability of her husband eventually

[@stardust7385]

Islam gave parental property rights to women 1400 years back!😅

[@umeshagbangalore4825]

(1)Ansistor properties registered unequally in 2013, after father death in 2012. Can women claim equality as per 12.8.2020 superme court order. Though discussion may be oral or email before register deed. (2)Ansistor properties registered deed in 2013 after death of father in 2012 Brother will give 50Lakh or one apartment 1200 Sq. Feet size t sister if he sell or construct one of property he got from unequal registered deed without any time limit. Can Sister apply for cancellation of unequal Partition deed by 12.08.2020 supreme court Order. (3) Some properties r left in unequal register partition deed in 2013 after death of father in 2012. Can Sister apply for cancelation with 12.8.2020 Supreme Court order. Since few properties r not included. (4)Father death in 2012.Father sold Ansistor properties in 2006 without daughter signature. Can daughter file case Pls support t answes questions of same unequal register partition deed in 2013 after death of father in 2012

[@nikhilthomas19]

To the ones crying here about hindu muslim Christians not everything a media says gives a clear picture ! 👀 Not everything that’s written In law can be read in layman language ! The ruling that has come is for HUF (hindu undivided family ) which is a separate person among many definition of a person ! Just because u r a hindu doesn’t make u a Hindu Undivided Family ! It is a form of business too just like partnership , company etc ! N has a set of laws

[@hanshilgandhi]

I was going to type the same.

[@myindia3645]

Can daughter claim both self earned and ancestors property?

[@aryaarai6696]

Self (your earnings) are any which ways yours. And if you are saying father's self earned property then yes. You can claim share from your male sibling in that too

[@abcdpqrs1281]

@@aryaarai6696 And what if father doesn't want to give it to the daughter and only his son?

[@myindia3645]

I meant self earned of father’s and his ancestors properly. Thanks 🙏 for the reply

[@aryaarai6696]

@@abcdpqrs1281 You can ask for your share rightfully in court. You can ask for property share or share's money worth

[@aryaarai6696]

@@myindia3645 No problem

[@biswajeetsahu4152]

Changes coming very slowly.

[@Rizu-kc3ze]

And people say SC is bikau

[@sagark9354]

Daughter born before 1939 can claim the father property sir

[@rishabhvarshney6396]

No after 2005

[@catgaming1864]

@@rishabhvarshney6396 before 1956

[@general_pinochet]

What about daughters of minority community..

[@KASHIFKHAN-bj1yd]

They already have the right from Sharia

[@general_pinochet]

@@KASHIFKHAN-bj1yd one nation two rules ?? 🤔

[@KASHIFKHAN-bj1yd]

@@general_pinochet actually 4 or 5 rules bcoz Christianity Judaism ,Islam ,or any other Was discussed very effectively when constitution was being made , Best is to respect and cherish the diversity

[@general_pinochet]

@@KASHIFKHAN-bj1yd it's ok untill and unless it's not discriminatory towards any gender.

[@KASHIFKHAN-bj1yd]

@@general_pinochet it never was as many muslim women have ran businesses in Hyderabad and southern states ,the thing is literacy Reading about laws is still considered taboo in muslim women in northern India but not in south

[@user-nh7kc5zp4v]

Kaha se music late ho....i love these type of music ...

[@Nigoto_Saituri]

Gand se, sunoge?

[@yoginagowda7410]

Am women, wrong decision by supreme Court

[@Sumit629sharma]

There could be a spike in cases in the near term. But a good change nonetheless.

[@anishshah1424]

Mixed feelings!

[@infinitetech957]

BINOD

[@OneMan00086]

Ghor kalyug

[@TenzinCh0edup1]

Men in the comment section hiding their frustration by calling out personal law of other religions XD

[@Nigoto_Saituri]

Yeah women still struggling in that particular religion to even wear the cloth of their choice 🤣

[@adityasinha8088]

@@Nigoto_Saituri very true . In sharia law if women gets raped she have to prove it in counrt by beinging tge raper and the women will get punished for sex 😶

[@sagarjadhav6568]

😁 we live in the same country so it would be a lot better to have only single judicial system and not religion based.

[@Nigoto_Saituri]

@@adityasinha8088 Chilla chilla ke sabko scheme bata de

[@TenzinCh0edup1]

@@Nigoto_Saituri legally anyone is allowed to wear whatever they want, it's their society that rebukes women when they wear or try something out of the domain of their social structure may it be any religion or any social denomination

[@KiranKumar-wt2oo]

now can take dowry legally and will focus on some rich Girl :-)

[@tusharjadhav2931]

In future parents will educate their daughter lesser than their sons.