Suzuki Swift Sport & GTi (0-100 KM/H) (0-60 MPH) ACCELERATION BATTLE

🔔 Subscribe with all notifications for more video's & upcoming video's!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to Redline Acceleration!
Here you will see 0-100 km/h (0-60 mph) runs of all kinds of makes and models of vehicles.
All the video's features materials protected by the Fair Use guidelines of Section 107 of Copyright Act.
We pay alot of attention to quality, and visuals of every video, and specifications of every car in every video.
If you own any material from the video and you don't want it to be there, please contact us via Email: [e-mail] and we will remove it immediately!

[@Ivan-jz9by]

The only car brand that genuinely stuck with 'hot hatch'. Unlike many others, small, quick, fun to drive and exciting. Civic is a good example of a hot hatch growing into a full on sports car, nothing bad about that, it's just interesting

[@andreamusso1469]

I'd argue the Fiesta ST also remained a true hot hatch, shame they're ending production soon though

[@philthomas7140]

That Swift GTi driver is crap. I had mine in low 7's... driver's ain't driver's

[@xorkatoss]

bro I actually didn't like the first gen swift sport because it was N\A and well they are slow lol so I had a colt czt 2006 - 1.5L Turbo, it was quite fun, but when I saw the 3rd gen swift sport and heard it was a 1.4L Turbo a was simply amazed by it! Currently I own a Swift RS 2019 1.0L Turbo and it's quite fun and economic! I hope soon I can swap it with a turbo Sport ;)

[@RetroRoberino]

The first one from the 90s sounds the absolute best, by far. No question.

[@gjwestonable]

Loved my Swift Sport 125hp great fun. The spec they gave was much slower than it actually was probably to help younger drivers afford the insurance. 😊

[@tonyrenshaw8328]

I had a 2012 sport and ive got a 2019 sport now. The turbo kicks in at low revs and it has the low end usable torque the previous ones dont have. It takes off from the lights quick and you dont have to rev the nuts of of it to get it moving, feels way faster than the previous models and a little more comfortable

[@rotyler2177]

Cool. Very few swift sports are turbo here in Australia. I have seen a regular Swift turbo but never a Swift sport turbo. Peace.

[@tonyrenshaw8328]

@@rotyler2177 thats a shame, the turbo is a game changer for these swifts, turns them from a good little city car into a brilliant little city car that handles motorways with ease as well while still having good fuel economy. Love it

[@rotyler2177]

@@tonyrenshaw8328 I saw one advertised just yesterday actually. hmm I agree

[@BrasoBiadonsky]

I had the 20010 zc31s sport, now I've bought the 2018 zc33s. Well, the zc31s was really really fun to drive, but the zc33s has Better performance. Both are really good cars

[@retrogradem.]

​@@rotyler2177 q

[@Encryptus1]

8,1 secs for the TwinCam 16 Valve? The driver knows that second gear goes all the way up to 105km/h (63mph) right? This was actually key feature made by Suzuki to beat other cars in 0-100km/h (60mph).

[@pepitoitaliano93]

Great record of the 2010 Swift sport at a trackday. Good motor and chassis !

[@eliaracing3438]

G13b 🚀

[@scottcooneymusic6736]

I remember there being a turbo version of that first 1.3 16valve car here in Canada.

[@MR-xm4ib]

No ,, was the sprint turbo Only 3 cylinders

[@chucknorris66611]

The 1.3 gti is a fantastic car 😍😍😍

[@sahilsalvi8672]

2005-2010 that 2nd wheelspin was at 60km/hr❤💪

[@joaohenriquepinton3352]

what a fun car !

[@akiyz_xd1751]

My favorite car

[@joshgalka9414]

Wow

[@cogsincogs]

That MHEV time is not realistic. It’s atleast 1s faster and if you launch it in 2nd gear it’s close to 7s. CTC got ~6.85s on theirs, but I think that was with bigger intercooler and aftermarket exhaust. Basically just adding some torque. 8.7s shown in this video just shows how bad the driver was.

[@SniperSnake50BMG]

Have the first gen but sedan. Not impressively fast but good reliability and fuel consumption

[@VwBora06]

F*cking finally

[@billywalker681]

What I dont understand much is almost everyone say that 33s are "much faster" then 32. Which thanks to 70+ more torque, they should be, but from many videos, at least in manual versions, the difference from 0-100 is marginal. 32s usually have around 7,3-7,4 and 33s 7,2-7,4. Only difference i saw was 33 with AT, then it hit 100 in around 6,5 sec. I bet it feels fast, cause of low end torque, but according to data, at least in MT , the difference doesn't seems to be that big.

[@Dantutz]

The HT81S is missing from the lineup.

[@sebastiensrb1299]

MHEV is around 8 sec (many tests say 7,9 sec). You juste have to change gears at 5000-5500 rpm max to have the electric boost. After, you just loose power and time. More torque and power in low-mid rpm. The non MHEV has more at the top rpm (5000-6000).

[@danex070]

also the mhev run had the worst gear changes.

[@sebastiensrb1299]

@@danex070 Yes, in the video the MHEV as a bad gear changing.

[@romaincandellier4152]

I love my boosterjet 140ch

[@Ohlukei]

if you start with the 140 hp sport in the 2nd gear you accelerate faster to 100 kph.

[@mrporsche4236]

I had a 1993 gti it had header exhaust and tune did 100kmh in 6 seconds and 14.5 quarter mile. I had a 2010 swift sport but it felt slower even with similar mods

[@Alex1001w]

Might as well stick with the manual 1.6l naturally aspirated

[@Skupik1]

25 years of development, turbocharging and hybrid - and a car is 0,5s slower.

[@joshgalka9414]

??

[@Gabriel_373]

They call it "hybrid" only because it has battery charged from braking, not actual electric motors. Makes car heavier and passes emissions nothing else.

[@pAirA_]

Also cars in general are heavier due to modern safety regulations.

[@Bluecarrr]

Depends on driving. In the video last guys were shifting like grannies

[@elazotacunaos4752]

The reality is (approximate) ZC31S: 8.5 ZC32S: 8.2 ZC33S: 7.3 ZC33S Hybrid: 7.8

[@user-rn1nb6bb3y]

1台目はカルタススポーツでないの？

[@Elad3000]

Had the volume up listening to engine sounds, then get hammered with horrible dubstep at the end.

[@hbsupermage]

GTi had a bad launch, could have shaved 0.3/4 on a better launch, that car was tricky to launch right because how light

[@jorgeguerreroduhart6543]

2017 up is faster than that, at least 1 sec from 0 - 100, i own one

[@Arucreid86]

Luckly these cars have scale to 260km/h. Still wonder if it is not too less

[@prec5552]

Where is a mk1?

[@FroggyplayzTyyy]

Who wants them to return to the us

[@prec5552]

This is a bad start and shifting for mk2

[@kd2833]

I owd the 1.6 sport 136 hp 2013 quik car for the hp. Now i own the 2019 1.4 sport best car i owd so mutch fun and low costs. 6.1 100 stage 1+ thats what the 2 liters do

[@ThePirouliette]

Complete NONSENSE ! Have anyone paid attention to the air temperature ? The ZC32S 0-100 was done at -7°c lol !

[@weishen5938]

1:49 Turbo charge still 8.7s¿ That’s Slow as F*ck and Slow as F*ck¡

[@Cos-mos0]

Bro an average car acceleration is 10 seconds to 15 seconds like bro you dont even have a car average 10 yr old

[@wasitbagtittyfckdriving.3840]

@@Cos-mos0 ​ @sleeshooveyy2520 LOL My ride is 15+ yr old still under 10s (inc 0-100) you can't even guess what it is idiot.

[@plotagonist452]

Your answer goes here