Swedish World's Best Archer 155mm Self-Propelled Artillery Systems Take Part in Fight Russia

In the realm of mobile artillery, the Archer Artillery System has emerged as a game-changer, revolutionizing the way artillery units operate on the modern battlefield. This advanced weapon system, developed by BAE Systems in collaboration with the Swedish Defense Materiel Administration, or FMV, combines mobility, precision, and rapid response capabilities like never before.
On Thursday, March 16, the Swedish government recently approved the decision to transfer eight Archer self-propelled artillery systems to Ukraine based on an assessment of the country's armed forces. The Swedish government requested that the country's parliament include this as part of an additional draft budget.
Support us:
KZbin : @USDefenseNews
Facebook : / usdn.official
Instagram : / us_defensenews
If you have any problems viewing this Video, please report it here: [e-mail]

[@rectalvapor2234]

I rarely bother correcting this type of mistakes, but there's a first for everything: The system was developed by Bofors between 1995 - 1999. BAE Systems Bofors didn't come into play before 2005, when part of Bofors was bought by BAE Systems, and Archer has been marketed under that name since.

[@fransmanlaparis4830]

Depending on the target and amount of shots, being able to go from 70km/h to stop, 30 seconds to fire ready and before the shots hit their target you have already packed up and are relocating is insane...

[@str8forthakill]

The ukranian artillerymen have already cut that down to 20 seconds.

[@pqsnet]

Also add.. If the archer is caught and ambushed, it has a devastating gun on its cockpit, and its main gun can even fire parallell to the ground like a tank... That is some serious firepower i would not want to be on the receiving end of if i was a BMP ambushing it. Because its well protected agains ground troops.

[@pqsnet]

@@str8forthakillIm not surprised, Ukrainians have proven them selves to be one of the best innovative countries in the world since 2022.

[@fightforfreedom21]

italy 🇮🇹 thanks Sweden for their commitment not only to defend Ukraine 🇺🇦 but the whole EU ;)

[@rampage3337]

yeah no.... because they are literally doing the opposite of that. they are fucking over Ukraine and they are fucking over Europe. Russia is not invading because they want to take over Russia is invading because USA is corrupting Ukraine and because USA plans to invade Russia. what ever bad feelings you got against Russia you have to have against USA to because everything bad Russia does USA does to but att a larger scale. also USA don't even provide some basic rights to their citizens. not even shit like vacations something even slaves in China has as a law. in the US taking a vacation is a privilege not a right. in the US you make less money working 2 minimum wage jobs + getting food stamps than you do when you work att mcdonalds in Russia. USA justice system regularly brakes UN human rights laws. USA tampered with Ukraine elections, USA is destroying the culture of Ukraine and putting them in massive debt. USA bombs innocent people by the millions during their fake warfare. USA is 3rd world in certain cities and places in the US. and USA forces the poor to pay the highest taxes while giving the rich every single tax brake imaginable. and those taxes go straight in the politicians pocket to. the whole Ukraine war is all about filling the pockets of US politicians not about Russia invading. i'm from Estonia so i understand the stupid hatred my country and other ex soviet countries have for Russia but it's toxic. it's ruining our culture and bringing worthless crappy western culture to us. Russia may not be that good of a country but it for sure is still better than USA and less corrupt than USA. Russia also provides healthcare and shit while USA just spends their taxes on the politicians.

[@altide8784]

Feel sorry for the soldiers, having to face something like this in war. All because their leader is a fool.

[@ThatOneGhostSpeed]

tyvm

[@captaincya9816]

@@altide8784who voted for him?

[@Daniel-gc9ws]

@altide8784, Yes agree But remember that Elensky is an actor (Hollywood) and Joe Biden is sick/retarded and should be at a nursing home. There is someone else pulling the strings here. The "invincible hand". I have lost count but at least 100.000 Ukrainian men is now dead and i does not matter if it is Swedish, russian or us made weapon. They are still human beings and could have been alive with competent, loyal,/not corrupt leaders.

[@pqsnet]

What most channels analysing the archer miss is, that it can fire its gun when it is parallell to the ground just like a tank. So in defence where enemy suddenly appear, or offensive, with open terrain, it is a heavy sniper that can point directly head on enemy. That is a devastating feature outmatching any tank in power.

[@icebice]

Scandinavia, Sweden being on top when it comes to military technology, has always produced high-tech weaponry for different purposes. We sending Archer systems to Ukraine means not only that we want to help but we need to dispose of them because we have superior technology over the Archer systems today. And if you've ever watched Discovery channel's "future weapons" program you'll see little Sweden is mentioned many times throughout the series. We even have tech that automatically blow up artillery projectiles mid-air and then automatically fire on the enemy artillery system that was responsible for that said projectile. It's like IRL aimbotting. I'm pretty impressed with how our little country actually produces top 3 military grade systems in the world.

[@duartesimoes508]

Like the History Channel, the Discovery Channel was a great quality channel one Century ago. 😧

[@KodakYarr]

Surprisingly good synthetic voice used here

[@mooneyes2k478]

9 rounds per minute, average rate, 21 shells and 6 charges per shell standard load, 30 seconds from last shell fired to packed up and rolling, and from stop to firing. Full refill of one unit in 8 minutes, from a 100-reload ammo carrier using standard 20-foot containers, so any vehicle capable of carrying such can be used. Using an armored Volvo 6x6 dumper vehicle, allows for practically over-the-shelf parts for easy of repair and/or replacement. High mobility, 65-70 kmh on road surfaces, and with a fuel tank allowing for 500 km range between refills. Large tires allowing for varying ground pressure, making it able to deal with a wide variety of surface conditions, from snow to mud to desert sand, much more so than a tracked vehicle, as well as 1 meter water depth when fording. The vehicle is mine-resistant, CBRN-protected, ballistically armored, fire-resistant and the windshields are resistant to shrapnel and medium-level firearms(7.62 Nato). With the combat compartment closed, the crew is protected and self-sufficient for up to 24 hours, and while the standard crew is a gunner, a unit commander and up to 2 operators, it is capable of being run and used by just the one crew member. For self-protection, the vehicle also have a remote-controlled weapons station on the driving compartment roof, capable of mounting a Minimi, FN MAG, Browning .50cal or a Mk. 19 40mm grenade machinegun, and is gyro-stabilized to allow for fire on target while moving. If something that cannot be fought with the weapon station threatens, it carries smoke launchers for cover while withdrawing. In every way a remarkable bit of kit.

[@frankeklund]

Im so proud of my home country

[@EmilM-pb2hn]

Right?! We should keep this up

[@zer00rdie]

lol, proud of what?

[@LordOfSweden]

@@zer00rdie Of our achievements.

[@LordOfSweden]

Yeah good. Just wish we weren't invaded currently.

[@zer00rdie]

@@LordOfSweden What achivements?

[@duartesimoes508]

Sweden is giving a lesson to many Countries, namely the US which became lost in internal political wars forgetting that there is a decisive real war going on, or Poland which decided to withdraw all military aid to Ukraine - I guess they aim to fight the ruzzians themselves later - or Slovakia who forgot much too quickly that Freedom has a price that must be paid. And there are others. Fortunately there are also noble people like the Scandinavians, the British, the Balts or the Dutch who are doing way more than the rest to keep Ukraine in the fight. With Nations like these, there is hope. 🇺🇦

[@tokenlau7519]

Poland did not withdraw their military aid to Ukraine.

[@peterwesterlund9137]

Great video👍😀☀️ Thank you!

[@user-cn8jp1lx9n]

With Bonus rounds, one Archer can take out an entire column of russian armour with 6 shots in 30 sec...

[@harrymcghee282]

Send them in - Russia needs more Target Practice and Scrap Metal Slava Russia fae Scotland "Russians Now the Only True Slavs the rest who try to call themselves that are now - """ SLAVES """

[@davesherry5384]

LOL! Russian massed artillery will make Archer a fable. Sweden is utterly stupid to get involved in this US manufactured war. They will regret ti,

[@dlighted8861]

Unfortunately a coordinated drone attack would take it out in twenty seconds. And that is if they haven't found it first.

[@MegaEssin]

​@@dlighted886120 seconds..... you would need to have a drone in the location its firing from then. Not one the german Pzh 2000 have been hit as of yet, so im not worried about the Archer. If you cant pinpoint the position its firing from, you wont find it either.

[@dlighted8861]

@@MegaEssin You think too simply. I still say a drone swarm can take it out. The expensive attacking drone doesn't have to be in the area just a cheaper surveilance drone which does not get destroyed and is part of an encompassing swarm. Drones are the future. You live in the past where brute force wins.

[@simulacrae]

The fun fact here is that the Swedish defense industry has been building weapons to fight the Russians over the last 60 years. Sadly we never got to see if the strv 103 would have been as effective as the designers thought.

[@villo1000]

If we can aim that is

[@GG07ghost]

yeah. But i still think wer should be happy that we never needed to use the metal cheese slope.

[@eriklagergren7124]

personally I think the S Tank would have been a real pain in the rear for the russians

[@nesta8273]

No, its not sad. Its great that it hasnt been in use against the Russians or it would have ment that they would have attacked us. If other ocuntries would been engaged in combat with Russians in all ears to hear what they say about it, but it is only positive that swedes havent been forced to use it.

[@FXGreggan.]

@@nesta8273 Yeah deterrence is the best defense :)

[@sunkendunken]

"Hur svenska stålet biter, Kom, låt oss pröva på! Ur vägen, moskoviter! Friskt mod, I gossar blå!"

[@andreww1225]

I’d say we have given Ukraine a lot of help

[@svensantesson2020]

You are swede?

[@rexdjdjsfortheworld4994]

I want to help Ukraine in person ❤ 🇺🇦 Sverige är alltid redo att hjälpa till ❤️

[@svensantesson2020]

@@rexdjdjsfortheworld4994 💪🇸🇪

[@schnek8927]

@@rexdjdjsfortheworld4994Sverige behöver hjälpa sig själv först...

[@zobius9191]

Russia: "We are fighting against NATO!" NATO: "If you were fighting us, there would be a Polish flag on the Kremlin in a matter of days."

[@svensantesson2020]

Even If they would "Only" Fight poland ... If they Had No nuclear warheads

[@jvsyoutube3298]

yeah, that nuclear thing....its a big problem for the whole world. Nuclear weapons should just be, completly for everyone forbidden and destroyed. If ANY! country disagrees, all other countrys should be required to invade and deestroy them (the bomb) and taken over until the goverment understand that they will not retake control over the country until they agree and destroys everything that can make them create another one. It is just one countrys problem with these bombs, its the whole world and population.

[@Wifyish]

Damn boys you are having a propaganda induced dream. Russia (or the former Soviet) has been on the perceived back-rope before only to turn it around and plant their flag across half of Europe. This without nukes. But now they have nukes and thus this is just crazy. Unless the plan is to activate more countries to fight the war Russia will win. If they even started to consider that they are losing they will most likely use tactical nukes. Is it worth it for us to sacrifice our men and our economy to let greedy politicians such as Biden get away with bribery and fraud? Wake up and stop supporting this madness.

[@kyosokutai]

@@svensantesson2020 I mean, it'd slow the Poles down for a moment, but if they spend all their nukes on poland, they'll have none for the rest of NATO.

[@sebastianag2966]

The fact that Russians are claiming that they are fighting NATO is laughable

[@LordNerfherder]

Archer and JAS/Gripen are designed for combat like in ukraine. They can be easily serviced, uses any modern weaponry and ammunitions. The same weaponry used on F35s and the cutting edge artilleries in the world. The gripen can land on any road and be pulled into the forest and serviced by a basic team. In combat where anyone will target an airplane at an airfield - you cannot afford to have airfields with your planes stored. With the archer being able to fire its rounds and just leave for deeping into your own territory to reduce the risk av counter battery fire is extremely useful. These types of systems would greatly benefit ukraine.

[@drumatix817]

It can also fire decoy rounds while en route - with no target nor armament - just to give targeting scopes a run for its mones

[@peter486]

this has to be the best long range arty in the world it just has to. try shoot and scoop with a paladin

[@supremacistdawn]

BAE is bae~

[@6XCcustom]

fill the entire magazine with Cluster Munitions and MRSI this the Russians would like

[@Mark-jq7re]

God Bless Ukraine 🇺🇦 from Australia 🇦🇺

[@sigmasix3719]

👎🏻🇺🇦🇺🇦🎱🎱🎱💀💀💀kaput

[@queenbrightwingthe3890]

@@sigmasix3719 bot

[@genoric4094]

@@sigmasix3719”sigma” lmao pathetic

[@Mimmi239]

I havent seen this in the battlefield yet

[@calleskurken9025]

asked and answered? you will not know, until too late

[@regregan6852]

​@@calleskurken9025wow, that's very cryptic...

[@user-zt5tz9cf9r]

respekt from Türkiye

[@RedLegs44]

basically it's the NOS No line of sight cannon that going to rule the battle field shoots up to 30 155 HE and Excalibur and RAP rounds under 5 min impressive

[@gundalfthelost1624]

And in Swedish military exercises using "gun and run" tactics it avoided drones, enemy tanks and scouts. It was quite impressive seeing that whole package haul ass through the woods, over roads and crossing towns in a flash.

[@user-nq2vf7xm4j]

السلام لشعوب العالم جميعا 🙏 لا للحرب

[@TheSnyting]

Never seen I battle. Perhaps a god sign

[@willriley1619]

Definitely not your grandma's Volvo

[@jimknopf8281]

Archer is so badass 🙂,bye bye Russian Orks.

[@dlighted8861]

No contest against a swarm of drones. Even old ways updated will not last long against highly mobile AI.

[@dragononwall8733]

There are still a lack of video with Archer, 'in Ukraine'. These films are old promotional flicks.

[@KamiKaZantA]

Yes, Swedish politics traditionally don't want huge media attention drawn to our arms and armor sales, and a requirement has been that the UA keep a low profile with pictures and videos (who knows, it might change during/after this conflict). Also long training time for this system, so it should only have been in Ukraine in recent times.

[@briangtester2536]

Looks exotic (specialized), expensive and fragile

[@Nubbe999]

It has not arrived yet. But are being prepared and training ongoing so they will soon be in Ukraine. Let's all hope Russia will leave Ukraine soon and the war will be over but until then the support from 50+ countries will continue.

[@DanAth-il1uq]

All Western Weapons sound good until they have to prove themselves in Ukraine 😂😂😂

[@Nubbe999]

@@DanAth-il1uq Western artillery in Ukraine has already proven to have a longer range and better accuracy than Russian. But Russia has more and shoots more artillery shells.

[@DanAth-il1uq]

@@Nubbe999 proven by whom?

[@Nubbe999]

@@DanAth-il1uq By Russian soldiers getting hit. And you can find information online about the best Russian artillery shell and compare it to the best Western artillery shells like Excalibur, Bonus and so on.

[@DanAth-il1uq]

@@Nubbe999 lol so comparing Russian soldiers getting hit by Ukrainian artillery vs Ukrainian soldiers getting Russian artillery and learning about this online …. you are able to deduce that Western Artillery is more accurate but Russians just have more shells? 😂😂😂 This sounds like the same logic Western ‘Intelligence” used. Oh the Russians are going to collapse with 6 months, they will run out of missiles, oh they are now fighting with shovels and washing machine parts. Oh wait a second they are now going to be defeated because we are sending them leopards, Bradley’s and Amx10 😂🤣🤣🤣 This the the very reason why hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost. The stupidity of western thinking .. the lack of mutual respect (previously this was called Mutually Assured Destruction or M.A.D) that would have lead to a diplomatic solution. This was a big miscalculation by NATO and lots of Ukrainians and Russians have died as a result. And yes if the US can go HALFway across the world to invade Iraq because they feel their security is threatened by non- existent WMD then Russia has every right to guarantee its safety.

[@Helperbot-2000]

very fascinating hope they help ukraine well

[@SicketMog]

They SHOULD be used to fight NATO for starting this pointless proxy war (and for 'sploding US "democrats" who wanted it along with their children).

[@johanswede8200]

I am Swedish. Send Ukraine all of our Archers. Use them against our only enemy.

[@jlv2335]

The problem with such automatic weapon is reliability

[@Macovic]

Keep it out of the deep mud, as with most vehicles

[@KalleKongo-uf5ei]

Has that ever happend?....

[@SilvanMarty]

When ukraine getting maybe 3 archers? They maybe in 2024 there? 🙏sweden its able giving pledged faster then another?

[@kerstiangmail]

Ukraine will get about 8-10 Archers. Considering there are about 30 of them in total, that is pretty much. More are being built however.

[@Sgt4skin]

@@kerstiangmailThere are exactly 48 units in existence. 24 to Sweden and 24 made to Norway who backed out so they went to storage but are now sold to Brittain and about 10 is given to Ukraine.

[@icebice]

8 of them is now in Ukraine

[@clausfrennessen2362]

Ruski here we come!! Sweden 🇸🇪

[@comradestinger]

Love the AI voice lol

[@mdrazibkhan407]

Best self propelled artillery system, but concern about self defence, specially in aerial uav attack, bec this system is so expensive,,, 🤔

[@matsv201]

It have to be a pretty large UAV to take out the Archer. It have excellent top defense Armour, better than pretty much any tank. Even the cooling system is armored. It have a built in radar for self protection, and a automatic machine-gun. On top of that it have a 50km range, so it can be pretty far from the front line, and its designed to redeploy after every time its fires. So its not like you can just go to where ever it fired the last time and find it there. (this is also true for the german 2000 series). Russian counter artillery battery is pretty much totally useless when Ukrainan artillery redeploy after every fire mission. Ukraine have been trapping them for 4 or 5 month now. With a first level artilery tageting russian post, it move away, counter artilery fire coming in. Counter-counter artillery fire going out. Taking out the russia post that cant redeploy sufficiently fast, counter-counter-counter-artilery goes out, Ukrainian artillery allredy moved. and 3rd way of artillery going out Russia had a HUGE amount or artillery half a year ago, now they have barley anything left.

[@Phooenixification]

I'm sure there are other systems in an artillery platoon to help with this. But i'm not at liberty to discuss it further.

[@MarkoSiren]

Yes, it's a good shame only that Sweden has given away half so they have a ridiculous 24 guns in the entire Swedish defense.

[@DannyDigger]

If you look close you can see what they named each archer “Lemmy” “prince of darkness” “slash” and so on! When I was in the military we named our tanks with names of really bad infections 😂

[@datadavis]

Sweden loves METAL🤩🤘🤘

[@DannyDigger]

@@datadavis yes, we have the metal in the world, both bands and factory made (hardox steel)

[@datadavis]

@@DannyDigger and good old Bofors guns

[@user-px3oh1fk6b]

Slava Ukrainyi!!!

[@klausberfelde-je2ye]

The Archer is an impressive piece but the RCH155 is definitely the best currently in the world!!!

[@lunaxylite]

should be added in war thunder

[@jansirkia3809]

What has appeared on the battlefield since the design of the archer, is the drone, hasn't it?

[@thomaseriksson6256]

Need a Drone protecting Unit as Panzier or Geopard. Or inculde a lazer on the canon

[@KamiKaZantA]

Drones yes, but there's a matter of range. The Archer fires rounds at 20-50 km away, and a small drone does not have the range or signal strength to even go that far. If the enemy (Russia) has infiltrated into the rear, they still have to call in artillery if they spot the Archers immedietly. Relaying the information, getting it where it needs to be, aiming the counter battery, and the travel time for the shells is significant when the Archer can deploy, fire three shells, and be moving again in one minute.

[@ashleyhippister2507]

They've already fired their rounds and left by the time the counter battery fire or drones get anywhere close...

[@AndrewCZ47]

Drones can work both ways. You can also have an Archer lobbing guided shells at max range with a drone lasing the targets. Pinpoint accuracy over 50+ kilometers. Also, nothing prevents you from accompanying the Archers with some anti air.

[@konzetsu6068]

Theres also the AA defense turrets mounted on the cabin. you see a few variations of them in this video so at least some thought has gone into that as well. so there are some options for countermeasures.

[@jernulf268]

Talk in your videos, instead of using TTS. It doesn't make the channel look very serious.

[@8greyz]

Since when was america the prime leader of NATO

[@BIBIWCICC]

Total waste of money as it can be neutralised by a £200 Amazon drone!

[@joejoe6611]

Self-propelled guns are more likely to be operated outdoors than in the city center. Usually, natural conditions such as forests, swamps, deserts, and mountains are harsh. I wonder if the self-propelled gun on the wheel can do its job. Besides, I'm surprised by the high price and maintenance costs.

[@tony18662]

Take paladin it sinks if not good ground due to its huge weight. and Archer is built for Sweden's and Finland terrain where Paladin simply get stuck. Finland have paladin but will replace them with these. Believe that answers your question.

[@ashleyhippister2507]

The Swedish version is on an 6x6 articulate hauler after evaluating the AS-90 and the Panzerhaubitze 2000 so it's especially made for our soggy muddy terrain. The new verision will however use a Rheinmetal 8x8 vehicle, I guess it works even better as it's more expensive and have undergone extensive testing.

[@skunkjobb]

Operated outdoors, yeah I'm pretty sure it will be. I would not like to fire that thing indoors.

[@tony18662]

@@skunkjobb That so fun and made my day.

[@AndrewCZ47]

The chassis is basically a Volvo articulated dump truck. About as much offroad capability as you can get from a wheeled chassis (with way better performance on any sort of road than a tracked vehicle can have).

[@Saurabhkumar-gx2wu]

Its humongous size itself makes it a good target

[@cadicamo8720]

So you putinists shouldn't mind Ukraine is receiving it.... Don't worry Archer is "useless", as Himars... And f16's!😂😂😂😂😂

[@KamiKaZantA]

It's not a front line vehicle in case you didn't know. When you have a range of up to 50 km you don't have the same need for thick armor and low profile. Good mobility and fast deploy/redeploy is more important.

[@regregan6852]

Worlds best? So good only 1 country is using it in limited numbers?? Pretty sure thats not how that works🤔

[@andersmalmgren6528]

Just because it's best doesn't automatically score sales. Sweden is a small country and we have countries like the US that use it political powers to sell their stuff that does not come up to the same standards. Same with Gripen vs the F35

[@kaustubhraizada]

​@@andersmalmgren6528once Sweden sold howitzer to india with tech transfer American started propaganda of corruption, ate up a government because that prime minister was interfering with cia plans in. Srilanka , when kargil war happened these artillery showed there worth and in 2008 the corruption charges were lifted by court

[@sebastian114]

Best also usually mean costly to give out to a large army, It is the best but Sweden aims for quality in its army more than anything else becuase we are a small nation. Outfitting lets say USA with the archer would be insanity as it would be far too expensive for them.

[@regregan6852]

@@sebastian114 not necessarily. Countries like America can afford multiple types so if it was so good then they would buy it and use it in select units not replace every artillery piece in their arsenal. The US has actually trialled archer already anyway. And then there are still a lot of similar sized and equally "rich" countries that can most definately afford the "best", Australia, Singapore and any number of gulf states just to name a few. There are still a lot of countries out there that don't skimp on defence and literally want nothing but the best.

[@hellmalm]

Take that argument and apply it to the F-22? Yes it’s world best wheeled Artillery system, It has not sold that much because it’s quit expensive. The British just bought it though. It’s also purpose built because we (Sweden) don’t have a huge amount of helicopters that can airlift a huge amount of artillery like the US. This wouldn’t make sense under those conditions. Bofors cannons are easy among the best in the world that’s why the US has widely adopted them in ships and planes, ever since ww2. So yes, thats exactly how it works!

[@mightandbelightnr2290]

I would guess there is Swedish operators included. Third World War here we go

[@Saurabhkumar-gx2wu]

Everything is best until it gets slapped in ukraine

[@Steeler-wg5zo]

ah, you mean Russian tanks? Right!!!!

[@LarssonNsP]

the russians aint got no more tanks

[@Vadim-gi4sg]

Не для украинского чернозема

[@liondecka9062]

No, Germans Panzerhaubitze 2000 is the worlds best ☝️

[@LarssonNsP]

just stop, it's not. Archer is ranked #1 mate.

[@kobusdowney5291]

You havent tried the G6 Rhino yet. That thing is very mobile, accurate, long range and quick to setup and dismantle.

[@dienar3717]

Nope, G6 South African gun from 1990's best still. Took out single tanks at 50km+ het n Angola. Acted as our 'airforce cover'

[@kempaswe4022]

At the same time, there are several former Swedish, NATO and American soldiers fighting on Russia's side against Ukraine.

[@zaarkeru3391]

Making up shit is so 2023.

[@LOLOVAL-os3pq]

a gun that has not found a customer, except of course in Sweden!! too expensive, too complicated, too expensive in maintenance or repairs, too heavy, unsuitable for combat! and for those who talk to me about its armor LOL frankly, if this is the only reason for its superiority to the CAESAR, because the servants are sheltered from its armor, the protection is sufficient only against a small ammunition of 7, 62 mm, by being locked in the cabin, you will not hear the Russian 152 mm ammunition arriving (the whistle which announces the arrival of the artillery ammunition) and there, the armor of the Archer will be totally useless, in being outside, we have a better idea of what is happening around us! and I have pseudo-specialists who also spoke to me about chemical attacks, well join the army, learn like me the basics of protection against chemicals and others, afterwards, you will talk about real things!! anyway, the ARCHER is finished, it is no longer manufactured!! Archer II arrives

[@lillfetisverige]

Waste of our money!

[@larsandersson5974]

Verkligen inte. Värt varenda öre. Vi borde ha gett mer för länge sedan.

[@lillfetisverige]

@@larsandersson5974 Gör det du din lilla sosse

[@Troopa87]

@@larsandersson5974 Vad är poängen med ett försvar om du ska ge bort det hela gratis dessutom. Finns en anledning varför det är väldigt tyst om det här i Svensk media, landet är korrupt från topp till tå.

[@elbuggo]

@@larsandersson5974 Vi kunde ha gett dem hela du? Vi borde ha gett hela du för länge sedan?

[@elbuggo]

@@larsandersson5974 Varför är du så mycket mer engagerad i invasionen av UA istället för invasionen från den tredje världen i ditt eget grannskap? Vem föredrar du egentligen? Putin, eller att du bor som i Somalia?