dont watch ,waste of time, ,if you offer a showdown ,give a showdown , and not a talking talk talk
@PewGoBoomLifeАй бұрын
Thanks! Your comment showed before I even clicked to watch the video. Only here to post this. Haha.
@SIERRA-dx9wmАй бұрын
So many of these clickbait videos Becoming fairly easy to spot them
@TooTall_JohnАй бұрын
I thought so too. Tried to jump forward , just got a tank history lesson.
@brasidas2011Ай бұрын
Thanks!
@beaumontgile5886Ай бұрын
For real
@dodgersfnshepard8673Ай бұрын
Came to watch a battle now hear a novel..do better or quit all together
@Absalon68Ай бұрын
More of a clickbait thing than not. . . `More of a military commercial.
@sammcbride2464Ай бұрын
Saying the T90 is better than the M1 is a joke.
@michaellynes35403 күн бұрын
The T-90 is just an upgraded version of the T-72.
@cameronlogan01Ай бұрын
Starting to think this channel is just made by ai. This is hot trash.
@NinjaArmy36Ай бұрын
It didn't use to be...but it appears it is now
@harrybrown6248Ай бұрын
Why Abrams is so much better? A tank is a tank..US tanks require tons of maintenance.. Russian tanks r very capable..
@SkazochniiАй бұрын
@@harrybrown6248 capable of what? The most striking feature of the Soviet tank building school is the carousel automatic loader, which gave us so many jokes about the tower throwing champions.
@SlipKnot7866Ай бұрын
T90M doesn't have Shtora-1 system, only the T-80UK and T-90A have that system and even Russian soldiers and tank crews themselves said "it really didn't work so it was removed for more important systems" The T-90S a.k.a. The T-90 Bhishma you bring up also is completely irrelevant in the Ukraine conflict since the T-90S is an export model that was designed and licensed to India. Jesus the amount of factual errors of identification alone is pretty bad in this video. You'd think some group of War Thunder players made it, but then again, I wouldn't even say that because at least the War Thunder playerbase knows what tanks are being used in Ukraine as opposed to whoever made this video and has no idea what's going on.
@michaellynes35403 күн бұрын
The T-90 is just an upgraded version of the T-72.
@natehanneman6763Ай бұрын
I’m not sure I’m feeling this new AI. There’s certain pauses and weird breaths that give it away.
@GubruАй бұрын
It really is quite shit tbh
@evoke4394Ай бұрын
Wow guy’s how far you have fallen from the good old days
@htickle1Ай бұрын
I hate this New AI narrator! 😕 I miss the old narrator!
@alutiousАй бұрын
Spam, not useful. Misleading. Click bait
@nedbone11Ай бұрын
If you're an American-based channel, WTH are you using AI voicing? Seems both ridiculous, and sketchy. Also, lose the looped stock footage.
@itsmoot2879Ай бұрын
and you are soviet Russian propagandist
@kevinkelleher8708Ай бұрын
@itsmoot2879 za troll
@pathfinderdiscovery9395Ай бұрын
The T 90s got smashed by Bradley’s
@cameronspence497717 күн бұрын
Yeah but this video doesnt even show that
@ironman6527Ай бұрын
I would rather watch a blank screen than watch looped footage that has nothing to do with the title. I started watching this channel over a year ago and it seems to be getting worse. Really liked this channel when I first started watching. Seems I am not the only one with these feelings either.
@galatians-2.20Ай бұрын
No man you sure aren't the only one
@sportmotor181Ай бұрын
This is AI generated and terrible, don't waste your time watching
@johnsalter541221 күн бұрын
Sadly, in the U.S. politics delayed the arrival of heavy weapons like the Abrams. This gave the Russians ample time to dig in and build layers of heavy defense. We need to quit playing politics with people’s lives.
@GubruАй бұрын
Man these channels have gone down hill fast - and the addition of an AI voice is truly obnoxious.
@kinggamerismАй бұрын
Repeats himself so many times
@NinjaArmy36Ай бұрын
Pretty sure its written by AI
@MRKLYESTEPАй бұрын
Sorry boys.. But the AI bullshit is making me consider unsubscribing... :/
@leeharrison2722Ай бұрын
Among the many things wrong with this video, the M1A1 is not the M1A2. It has the 105 gun, not the 120. It is also less heavily armored.
@davidnemoseck900719 күн бұрын
The M1 had the 105. By the time of the A1 version, it had the 120.
@FoundingYouTuber-2005Ай бұрын
Men: BEFORE watching videos like this always read the comments. That may save you a lot of time because you won't be watching videos like this. E.g., the comments in this video would tell you: it is an AI-generated video, that factually there's many errors in it, and that at best it is a compendium of poorly-narrated boshtommyrock (aka "bullsheet").
@erikiskandermeon9999Ай бұрын
A single Soviet T-62 managed to wipe out several M-1 Abrams and many Challenger 3 and destroyed the rest of the remaining Leopard 2. Russia's well known engineering superiority over all Western and Japan's and South Korean military industry pays off here. While the last design of the T-92N, N for Navy, is capable of swim and dive while the Super Armada A, A equals Airforce, is capable of going airborne. This capability we see often in the older designs of all the formidable Russian tank force. Sometimes their turrets achieve heights up to 50 feet. From up there, Russia has better air superiority than it's airforce.
@ParawataАй бұрын
started falling asleep so took a look at the comments. Pointless video, tells you what you already know and 5 min in no closer to this mythical showdown.
@jamesburke4437Ай бұрын
This guy is full of it! The T-90 does a jack in the box just like all the Russian tanks!
@brianv1988Ай бұрын
What's with the poetic narration like it's an action movie or something this channel has went off a cliff there's so many false information in this entire video it's unbearable to watch Russia doesn't have huge numbers of t90m they're actually rare on the battlefield most of their tanks are upgraded Soviet era T 72 t80 t62. And all of these tanks are being destroyed by simple drones even M1 Abrams and other Western tanks are not built for drone Warfare that are able to hit weak spots we have seen this multiple times in Ukraine with both Russian and Western armor easily picked off by drones yeah Western thanks have the better armor and survivability but in drone Warfare when they have multiple flying at you no armor in modern times today can withstand that many hits without getting disabled or destroyed that's why survivability is so important with armor and 9x out of 10 they're not facing against other tank on the battlefield in Ukraine it's usually artillery drones an infantry
@danr1920Ай бұрын
Just generic footage. Where the showdown ????????????????
@NinjaArmy36Ай бұрын
Garbage AI voice. Been watching Dark/Dark5 for almost 10 years....the new AI voice is garbage and seems to even be written by AI. Its sad
@ClericChrisАй бұрын
Someone hasn't been paying attention. Tanks are getting their ass beat in Ukraine. All of them! There are fields full of T-90 husks. The Bradley has been one of the few successful assault vehicles.
@corbinangelo3359Ай бұрын
T90 among the 2 most powerful tanks in the world? give me a break
@cameronspence497717 күн бұрын
Lol not even close probably one of the worst modern battle tanks
@fdavidharrisson5023Ай бұрын
Even IF the t-90 had won. It is the most modern and advanced tank Russia has to put forward. The M1 that Ukraine has is at least 20 years old and far removed from its most recent iteration.
@jesseperez1753Ай бұрын
This must of happened in an alternate universe because it sure didn’t happen on this one 😂
@janmichael1262Ай бұрын
I think you mean the " impenetrable shield of BRITSH engineering"
@em1osmurfАй бұрын
well, the AI turd fest gets a thumbs down and unsub. this is bad. really bad.
@kyllerkillАй бұрын
Does he mean the t-90 that two Bradley’s destroyed with only their chain guns and not their tow’s. The one that’s been blown away time after time.
@usernamename2978Ай бұрын
I stopped at _The silence was shattered by the echo of clashing metal..._ Someone's been on a Creative Writing course (economy version). Real life doesn't need this poetic decoration.
@blancobullАй бұрын
I liked the other AI voice better, unless that was a human being paid for actual work. If it was a human I really really don't like this AI voice.
@zanemcgee1133Ай бұрын
I agree
@shagal2142Ай бұрын
Crazy, how much BS can actually be put in 1 Video! Arena deflecting APFSDS rounds of M1 tanks
@ProfessorMAGАй бұрын
Russian shill, T-90 isn't as good as this story claims.
@crivera1728Ай бұрын
This thing has a lot of false information about the vehicles involved.
@n1kobgАй бұрын
Posted 35 mins ago & cites open sources that Russia lost 150 tanks LMAO
@CarlPerreaultАй бұрын
You just need a Brad to stop a T-90
@RonaldPlottАй бұрын
This is not worth watching, just go read any electronic libary. The M1A1 Abrams in Ukraine are also a weakened armor version with the depleted uranium portion removed. What does the logistic problem of only having APFSDS shells and no HE and trying to blow a house apart have to do with the tank's capability? To the best of my knowledge no tank is drone proof, they all have weak spots, and these tank protective system are not that effective against APFSDS shells, really designed to intercept missiles.
@LIONIQ-foxhound21 күн бұрын
He is talking here over a hypothetical scenario that did not happen... the m1 abrams is a huge beast with a high profile (although lower than its predecessor m60) and a large cross-section, which makes it an easy target to discover and distinguish and 🎯 from a longer distances, however, this beast still possesses some operational and tactical advantages and qualities such as high speed, excellent acceleration, and reverse speed and a low engine sound signature, coupled with advanced protection level and modern fire control system connected to advance multi channel sighting system... In general, the Ukrainian theater of operations helps Russian tanks show some of their advantages on the basis that they are historically designed to operate in topographically complex theaters of operations extending from western european continent to the western of Russian, where the density of vegetation limits the horizontal visibility and helps tanks set up mobile ambushes for the other enemy weapon systems and formations, especially the AFVs... (Of course, this is after excluding changes brought to the battlefield environment by the tremendous development that FPVs have introduced in tactical and operational reconnaissance capabilities)... Now everyone is waiting for such a engagement, but of course by using APFSDS munitions and not with HEAT, which was used by the Russian army against the M1Abrams, and the rest of western supplied AFVs, either through FPVs or ATGMs and in some case's even GLATGMs... It is assumed that the designing preferences, advanteges and qualities of the t90 (and older Soviet era tanks going back to the t64) in terms of lower profile, small cross-section and thus small dimensions should proves it self in those theaters of operations and should play in favor of the t90m which enjoy the protection of the latest generation of the Russian reactive armor suits the Relikt (4S23), coupled with advanced fire control system and two third generation infrared sighting system one standard for the gunner and the other CITV for the commander, beside most (if not all) of the direct the engagements, across the Ukrainian theaters of operations happens from distances not exceeding the 2000 meters, which in turn should enhance or increase the penetration capabilities of kinetic energy munitions fired by Russian tanks...
@BracaPhotoАй бұрын
The Soviet tanks we faced in Iraq had downgraded armour as well as downgraded ammunition. It's well documented 🎉
@GaryBonnell-m9q29 күн бұрын
You forgot to mention the t 90 is man by three cosmaunts and has the best ejecting turrets on the battlefield some have ejected up to two hundred yards talk about serious airtime
@user-nf2if1jb1jАй бұрын
"Arena protective system"..... what a JOKE!
@ElectricEnduranceАй бұрын
Well the T-90 can't withstand a one way drone LOL, what crap
@3nity8928 күн бұрын
t90m has explosive reactive armor not some made up "arena active protection system"
@fraggle23Ай бұрын
American engineering??? Where abouts in America is Chobham again? That armour is British
@cameronspence497717 күн бұрын
They have no idea what they are talking about lol
@jeffbudd7678Ай бұрын
Next of Dark Tech: terrible AI voiceovers.
@davidgardner863Ай бұрын
The same stock footage clips shown over and over again got pretty boring.
@globalcitizen8321Ай бұрын
T90-M doesn't have Kontakt 5 ERA, having rather Relikt ERA, which is a much more advanced reactive armour.
@chigoonies3883Ай бұрын
Nor does it have an arena system that “sprang into action” This video was made by a guy who read a wikipedia stub . Total trash. The ai voice is unbearable.
@WartycoonDuosАй бұрын
in this video it tells us that the shtora-1 blocked an abrams cannon round when it can only be used against missiles like atgms and also the t90M doesnt have the shtora-1 i call BS
@josephnoneofyourbeeswax8517Ай бұрын
Single tanks move tactically, not strategically.
@tcnielАй бұрын
Advertisements and stock footage, poor video waste of time
@cavtrooperАй бұрын
The M1A1 Abrams does fire 120mm APFSDS rounds, because if it doesn't, then what the heck did we fiire from the Abrams for the 11 years I was in the U.S. Army!? I would really like to know. The M829 is training version of the 120mm APFSDS rounds that it fires. They have no idea what they are talking about.
@richardsuggs8108Ай бұрын
The T-90 can fire a missile. However, the missile is expensive and the T-90s don’t carry the missiles.
@flingmonkey5494Ай бұрын
How many T90's do the Russians have and what is their production of new tanks like? I have heard that they re suffering from inability to access the computer electronics necessary to produce new vehicles, and without the microprocessors the tanks are useless. So do their losses outstrip their ability to replace? Also, what is the overall reliability of the T90. I have heard that during the later period of WWII the vaunted Tiger tanks had major reliability issues along with very long repair times, I heard that the average miles to transmission failure was less than one tank of gas and repair times stretched into weeks or months (problematic in the heat of battle.) How does the T90 stack up?
@billstapleton108410 күн бұрын
Both are good tanks, the difference is the quality of the crews.
@tonyjf9097Ай бұрын
Dude get your facts right, the systems you say are on the junk T90 are not. What happened to the showdown?
@Ed-ty1krАй бұрын
Bunkers are toumbs, tanks are targets, and what goes up must come down...
@antlamaki1108Ай бұрын
'',,, the best tank is the one with best crew,,,'' Well, it's an very old military wisdom that tells: better trained always wins.....
@Andre_M_3DАй бұрын
This guy just puts out garbage AI content now. Hopefully, when enough unsubscibe, the creator will get the hint.
@robertlegacy7508Ай бұрын
When the T90 goes ‘boom’, it’s turrets already hundreds of feet in the air
@Shocktroop_0313Ай бұрын
1:03 Arena APS aint stopping a 120mm round.
@Unknown-r2p2o13 күн бұрын
What about super arena APS
@Shocktroop_031313 күн бұрын
@@Unknown-r2p2o “Super Arena” I can’t find. Do you have any links? Data shows Arena APS can “intercept” incoming projectiles moving up to 2300 ft per second. A standard US M829 apfsds, 120mm round has a muzzle velocity of 5500 ft per second.
@mtebaldi1Ай бұрын
So this video is a T90 advertisement I guess.
@normanntege5603Ай бұрын
this happens to be the best and most balanced analysis of these machines since I started paying rabid attention to the series. Thank you and keep it up 👏
@jasonbose3507Ай бұрын
A BRADLEY HAS ALREADY DESTROYED A T-90 TANK! It wasn't much of a fight! The T-90 just spun their turret 900 degrees before crashing. The BOOM & explosions 💥.....with the flying turret reaching the stars, the russian junk way. Fireworks 🎇 and celebrations for the Ukrainians and their Bradleys. The russian T-90 IS JUNK! Just my opinion though. Thanks for the video 📸.
@borland851310 күн бұрын
The T-90 was not destroyed by the Bradley. Destroying an armored vehicle is referred to as a 'catastrophic kill.' The Bradley did not even manage to get a 'mobility kill.' What the Bradley did do, was disable the T-90's targeting systems. As for the turret spinning, that could have been from a crewman being disabled and leaning on the controls. The bottom line is the 25mm auto cannon on a Bradley cannot defeat the armor of any modern MBT. But, it can disable other systems on one. Yes the Bradley won the engagement, but saying it destroyed the tank without using its TOW missile is an exaggeration. As a side note, Bradleys are some of the biggest turds on the planet Earth. So, that tells you what Soviet equipment is like. Oh yeah, I should also mention there is a good chance I know what I'm talking about since I was in armor units when I was a soldier so have been intimate and swapped fluids with a lot of M1s and Bradleys, and this video is copulating trash.
@ArthurWright-uv4wwАй бұрын
What next for MBTs
@donaldmackerer9032Ай бұрын
This was very disappointing. Where was the show down. Definite collective.
@pwdajjalАй бұрын
The T90 is the pinnacle of Russian Armoured Division and Russia superior technology... M1 Bradley: Hold my beer....
@BenVaserlanАй бұрын
countless? impenetrable shield?
@richardfalter62445 күн бұрын
31 tanks aren't going to change much
@johnallen7807Ай бұрын
Only after the British gave Challenger II.
@beqakvelashvili440227 күн бұрын
Im taking my like back
@gertfeikens7311Ай бұрын
Russian propaganda sounding like WW2 Nazi propaganda.
@webbzilla8581Ай бұрын
Damnit I came to hear about the battle not a tech lesson
@12B0692Ай бұрын
this is all nonsense. The M1 in ukraine does not have the advanced DU armor, so a 125mm hitting first would be a kill. The M1s 120mm would not be intercepted by a T90 Arena defense system. And no Russian armor has survived against the M1s main gun to date. This is all nonsense.
@geordiegeorge9041Ай бұрын
What a load of BS whoever made this has no idea what he is talking about.
@RobertElsasser-j2uАй бұрын
Russia still has T90 tanks with the Jack in the Box turrets? Lol. Garbage
@ryleeculla5570Ай бұрын
I thought the American abrams that were sent to Ukrainian didn’t have the obsidian or something armor
@snapdragon6601Ай бұрын
I thought this was going to be about an actual tank on tank engagement, not speculation about what might happen if those two tanks met up on the battlefield. This video was a waste of time. Thumbs down. 👎
@michaelscroggins8057Ай бұрын
This isn't close to a fair comparison. M1A3sep would be a better comparison. That's not including our next gen tanks the M90M would never service a tank on tank battle with M1A3sep period much less the tank crew advantage so no I don't except the premise of this video. 🤨🙄
@mikedowney21684 күн бұрын
The turrets on the Russian tanks go pop. Junk
@offinthehaedАй бұрын
LOL !😂😂😂😂 Russia got like (3) T-90m's , they want send them to Ukraine, that's why they still have them...
@factcheckbeforeyouopenyoum947414 күн бұрын
Less weight, there is also bird trap meshing
@mcp121Ай бұрын
Active protection systems stop missiles, but are too slow to stop tank rounds. This is trash info.
@fasold2164Ай бұрын
You shouldn't boast so much about the terrific M1 Abrams (in fact several were destroyed by russian drones), it only makes you ridiculous,,,
@lorenhamstra5964Ай бұрын
I think this channel must be a Russian bot.
@joelester7704Ай бұрын
The T-90 is a piece of crap. It has all of the flaws of older Russian tanks. All of the ammunition is stored around the turret and when hit all of that ammo goes off, usually at once attempting to put what is left of the turret into orbit. Yes, in WW2 the Russians built the best tank of the war. They have done little since. The T-90 is like putting pearls on a pig. It ruins the pearls and annoys the pig.
@kevinkelleher8708Ай бұрын
BS you attribute many, including nomenclature, acronyms and other distinctly Abrams characteristics to the Soviet/Russian version of the MBT(T90)
@CharlesLexander19 күн бұрын
The m1 is currently smoking g t90s and most of the time the difference is actually in the men inside except for the Russian space agency inside the turret that when hit sends the turret into orbit
@borland851310 күн бұрын
Your information is largely incorrect, and it sounds like AI word salad.
@jonesmatthew7511Ай бұрын
Both destroyed by $500 drones?
@jeremywilson2022Ай бұрын
Who are you kidding the 590 is a load of shit!!!
@robertchautardjensen6846Ай бұрын
This nonsense must be from a Russian bot. Total waste of time.
@RobertMarshall-d2nКүн бұрын
video said t90 reactive armor keep it safe but that is not true russia is almost completely out of t90s and other jack in the box turret tanks.
@richwalter3107Ай бұрын
Fight this shit by reporting it as disinformation or misleading
@davidrhea3716Ай бұрын
This is worse than watching a stupid video game.
@axelpro09Ай бұрын
What movie did you make in your sick mind, you know???😂😂