T-90M vs M1 Abrams - Ukraine's Most Frightening Showdown

[@constructioncomplete-1980]

dont watch ,waste of time, ,if you offer a showdown ,give a showdown , and not a talking talk talk

[@PewGoBoomLife]

Thanks! Your comment showed before I even clicked to watch the video. Only here to post this. Haha.

[@SIERRA-dx9wm]

So many of these clickbait videos Becoming fairly easy to spot them

[@TooTall_John]

I thought so too. Tried to jump forward , just got a tank history lesson.

[@brasidas2011]

Thanks!

[@beaumontgile5886]

For real

[@sammcbride2464]

Saying the T90 is better than the M1 is a joke.

[@michaellynes3540]

The T-90 is just an upgraded version of the T-72.

[@TORINGENorbirdpeople]

It said it's slower but I think it said the t90 has more advanced electronics right? Will watch again

[@Z_732]

You also need to consider, these are m1a1 tanks. Not the most advanced versions made. This is the lowest model made of the Abrams. Its still no joke if it stands toe to toe against a t90. (Which putin claimed was the best in the world) Now an m1a2, or a sepv3 would be a no contest. Jmo

[@NIGHTMARE-zy7tq]

just also remember this is M1A1 (1990'S)

[@michaelfitzgibbons2739]

This is simply Russian propaganda. Russia is good at propaganda.

[@pathfinderdiscovery9395]

The T 90s got smashed by Bradley’s

[@cameronspence4977]

Yeah but this video doesnt even show that

[@MR_stone69]

They only disabled the optics and turret rings it was kill by a drone not a Bradley

[@Roger500Magnum]

@@MR_stone69 Lol. Ok

[@dodgersfnshepard8673]

Came to watch a battle now hear a novel..do better or quit all together

[@Absalon68]

More of a clickbait thing than not. . . `More of a military commercial.

[@jrcicirello]

Yeah, commercial for Russia. The M1 Abrams actually have reactive armor from the very first model.

[@juancastilla6001]

Agree.

[@cameronlogan01]

Starting to think this channel is just made by ai. This is hot trash.

[@NinjaArmy36]

It didn't use to be...but it appears it is now

[@harrybrown6248]

Why Abrams is so much better? A tank is a tank..US tanks require tons of maintenance.. Russian tanks r very capable..

[@Skazochnii]

@@harrybrown6248 capable of what? The most striking feature of the Soviet tank building school is the carousel automatic loader, which gave us so many jokes about the tower throwing champions.

[@leesharp7683]

I watched twice to see if i missed something. I didn't. This is BS. The title is a lie. Shame on you.

[@natehanneman6763]

I’m not sure I’m feeling this new AI. There’s certain pauses and weird breaths that give it away.

[@Gubru]

It really is quite shit tbh

[@SlipKnot7866]

T90M doesn't have Shtora-1 system, only the T-80UK and T-90A have that system and even Russian soldiers and tank crews themselves said "it really didn't work so it was removed for more important systems" The T-90S a.k.a. The T-90 Bhishma you bring up also is completely irrelevant in the Ukraine conflict since the T-90S is an export model that was designed and licensed to India. Jesus the amount of factual errors of identification alone is pretty bad in this video. You'd think some group of War Thunder players made it, but then again, I wouldn't even say that because at least the War Thunder playerbase knows what tanks are being used in Ukraine as opposed to whoever made this video and has no idea what's going on.

[@michaellynes3540]

The T-90 is just an upgraded version of the T-72.

[@MRKLYESTEP]

Sorry boys.. But the AI bullshit is making me consider unsubscribing... :/

[@evoke4394]

Wow guy’s how far you have fallen from the good old days

[@nedbone11]

If you're an American-based channel, WTH are you using AI voicing? Seems both ridiculous, and sketchy. Also, lose the looped stock footage.

[@itsmoot2879]

and you are soviet Russian propagandist

[@kevinkelleher8708]

@itsmoot2879 za troll

[@Leo_Pard_A4]

​@@itsmoot2879nice grammar.

[@itsmoot2879]

@@Leo_Pard_A4 ok youngster, if missing commas are your issue with that statement, add them yourself.

[@jamesburke4437]

This guy is full of it! The T-90 does a jack in the box just like all the Russian tanks!

[@alutious]

Spam, not useful. Misleading. Click bait

[@UsagiYojimbo-f1u]

I have a frightening showdown this morning between me and my toilet.

[@AJ_Jones198XAD]

I would rather watch a blank screen than watch looped footage that has nothing to do with the title. I started watching this channel over a year ago and it seems to be getting worse. Really liked this channel when I first started watching. Seems I am not the only one with these feelings either.

[@galatians-2.20]

No man you sure aren't the only one

[@sportmotor181]

This is AI generated and terrible, don't waste your time watching

[@NinjaArmy36]

Garbage AI voice. Been watching Dark/Dark5 for almost 10 years....the new AI voice is garbage and seems to even be written by AI. Its sad

[@johnsalter5412]

Sadly, in the U.S. politics delayed the arrival of heavy weapons like the Abrams. This gave the Russians ample time to dig in and build layers of heavy defense. We need to quit playing politics with people’s lives.

[@brianv1988]

What's with the poetic narration like it's an action movie or something this channel has went off a cliff there's so many false information in this entire video it's unbearable to watch Russia doesn't have huge numbers of t90m they're actually rare on the battlefield most of their tanks are upgraded Soviet era T 72 t80 t62. And all of these tanks are being destroyed by simple drones even M1 Abrams and other Western tanks are not built for drone Warfare that are able to hit weak spots we have seen this multiple times in Ukraine with both Russian and Western armor easily picked off by drones yeah Western thanks have the better armor and survivability but in drone Warfare when they have multiple flying at you no armor in modern times today can withstand that many hits without getting disabled or destroyed that's why survivability is so important with armor and 9x out of 10 they're not facing against other tank on the battlefield in Ukraine it's usually artillery drones an infantry

[@danr1920]

Just generic footage. Where the showdown ????????????????

[@Gubru]

Man these channels have gone down hill fast - and the addition of an AI voice is truly obnoxious.

[@htickle1]

I hate this New AI narrator! 😕 I miss the old narrator!

[@em1osmurf]

well, the AI turd fest gets a thumbs down and unsub. this is bad. really bad.

[@kinggamerism]

Repeats himself so many times

[@NinjaArmy36]

Pretty sure its written by AI

[@globalcitizen8321]

T90-M doesn't have Kontakt 5 ERA, having rather Relikt ERA, which is a much more advanced reactive armour.

[@chigoonies3883]

Nor does it have an arena system that “sprang into action” This video was made by a guy who read a wikipedia stub . Total trash. The ai voice is unbearable.

[@usernamename2978]

I stopped at _The silence was shattered by the echo of clashing metal..._ Someone's been on a Creative Writing course (economy version). Real life doesn't need this poetic decoration.

[@cavtrooper]

The M1A1 Abrams does fire 120mm APFSDS rounds, because if it doesn't, then what the heck did we fiire from the Abrams for the 11 years I was in the U.S. Army!? I would really like to know. The M829 is training version of the 120mm APFSDS rounds that it fires. They have no idea what they are talking about.

[@synthyawylder3297]

Reported: Misleading description. No "showdown", just a verbal comparison.

[@kyllerkill]

Does he mean the t-90 that two Bradley’s destroyed with only their chain guns and not their tow’s. The one that’s been blown away time after time.

[@shagal2142]

Crazy, how much BS can actually be put in 1 Video! Arena deflecting APFSDS rounds of M1 tanks

[@FoundingYouTuber-2005]

Men: BEFORE watching videos like this always read the comments. That may save you a lot of time because you won't be watching videos like this. E.g., the comments in this video would tell you: it is an AI-generated video, that factually there's many errors in it, and that at best it is a compendium of poorly-narrated boshtommyrock (aka "bullsheet").

[@jeffreysmith9332]

I'm sorry, but the T-80 is a post-Soviet era tank. And as for the T-90 being "heavily battle tested". When and where was it EVER battle tested? And, oh, by the way, how did the autonomous defenceman system intercept a depleted uranium dart traveling at Mach Jesus?

[@WartycoonDuos]

in this video it tells us that the shtora-1 blocked an abrams cannon round when it can only be used against missiles like atgms and also the t90M doesnt have the shtora-1 i call BS

[@michaellynes3540]

The T-90 is hot garbage. The T-90 is just a hybrid tank, a combination of design elements from the T-72 and T-80 tanks, taking the best features of both to create a new, improved main battle tank.

[@r.j.dunnill1465]

Oryx has documented 115 T-90M losses. The first documented was lost to a Carl Gustaf anti-tank rocket introduced in 1948. And how about the documented-on-video clash between a T-90M and two Bradleys, where the Bradleys won? So much for invincibility.

[@richardsuggs8108]

The T-90 can fire a missile. However, the missile is expensive and the T-90s don’t carry the missiles.

[@zapcomix]

Yeah, the only minor drawback of the T-90 is that it explodes if you look at it sideways. No biggie...

[@GaryBonnell-m9q]

You forgot to mention the t 90 is man by three cosmaunts and has the best ejecting turrets on the battlefield some have ejected up to two hundred yards talk about serious airtime

[@jesseperez1753]

This must of happened in an alternate universe because it sure didn’t happen on this one 😂

[@jeffreysmith9332]

EVERY ABRAMS FIRES APFSDS, NOT JUST THE M1A2. THEY ALSO FIRE H.E.A.T. (HIGH EXPLOSIVE ANIT-TANK), M.P.A.T. (MULTIPURPOSE ANTI TANK), CANISTER (BASICALLY 120MM SHOTGUN SHELL) AND S.T.A.F.F. (SMART TARGET ACTIVATED FIRE AND FORGET) AMONG OTHER OPTIONS.

[@DavidFMayerPhD]

Arena does not work. If it did, Russia would never have lost the thousands of tanks that were lost.

[@kevinsage245]

Auk M1a1 Abraham's were upgraded to 120mm Barrel, and more modern optics... Only 5 have been lost as destroyed.

[@jameshorn270]

The M1A1, contrary to what is said here, can fire armor piercing discarding sabot rounds. They have been used in the Iraq wars. In fact, one suggestion for the cause of Gulf War Syndrome was heavy metal poisoning from the depleted uranium used in these rounds. When the round goes through armor, its outer surface tends to be stripped from the round as a uranium powder.

[@corbinangelo3359]

T90 among the 2 most powerful tanks in the world? give me a break

[@cameronspence4977]

Lol not even close probably one of the worst modern battle tanks

[@charlesbelser7249]

Too much talk . You inferred a video of a fight between the two but as most usually on here just another lie.

[@n1kobg]

Posted 35 mins ago & cites open sources that Russia lost 150 tanks LMAO

[@GrumpyWarVet]

"Arena protective system"..... what a JOKE!

[@CarlPerreault]

You just need a Brad to stop a T-90

[@ProfessorMAG]

Russian shill, T-90 isn't as good as this story claims.

[@crivera1728]

This thing has a lot of false information about the vehicles involved.

[@fraggle23]

American engineering??? Where abouts in America is Chobham again? That armour is British

[@cameronspence4977]

They have no idea what they are talking about lol

[@daigakunobaku273]

>> T-90M >> Proceeds to show a T-72M1 with Contact-1 ERA

[@gregking7926]

And yet we know the T-90's were no better than the T-80's, Drone bait.. The M-1's could pick a T-90 off at distance.

[@Andre_M_3D]

This guy just puts out garbage AI content now. Hopefully, when enough unsubscibe, the creator will get the hint.

[@RobertMarshall-d2n]

video said t90 reactive armor keep it safe but that is not true russia is almost completely out of t90s and other jack in the box turret tanks.

[@joelester7704]

The T-90 is a piece of crap. It has all of the flaws of older Russian tanks. All of the ammunition is stored around the turret and when hit all of that ammo goes off, usually at once attempting to put what is left of the turret into orbit. Yes, in WW2 the Russians built the best tank of the war. They have done little since. The T-90 is like putting pearls on a pig. It ruins the pearls and annoys the pig.

[@kimmcrae9146]

title is T 90 vs Abrams now we are going back to 2022 and how the abrams was created holy shit cant you just give us the story without clickbait.

[@Shocktroop_0313]

1:03 Arena APS aint stopping a 120mm round.

[@Unknown-r2p2o]

What about super arena APS

[@Shocktroop_0313]

@@Unknown-r2p2o “Super Arena” I can’t find. Do you have any links? Data shows Arena APS can “intercept” incoming projectiles moving up to 2300 ft per second. A standard US M829 apfsds, 120mm round has a muzzle velocity of 5500 ft per second.

[@blancobull]

I liked the other AI voice better, unless that was a human being paid for actual work. If it was a human I really really don't like this AI voice.

[@zanemcgee1133]

I agree

[@borland8513]

Your information is largely incorrect, and it sounds like AI word salad.

[@robertlegacy7508]

When the T90 goes ‘boom’, it’s turrets already hundreds of feet in the air

[@normanntege5603]

this happens to be the best and most balanced analysis of these machines since I started paying rabid attention to the series. Thank you and keep it up 👏

[@terrencecescon102]

Sounds like a commercial for Russian military equipment

[@JosephKano]

Wheres the video? Reported for misinformation.

[@tcniel]

Advertisements and stock footage, poor video waste of time

[@ClericChris]

Someone hasn't been paying attention. Tanks are getting their ass beat in Ukraine. All of them! There are fields full of T-90 husks. The Bradley has been one of the few successful assault vehicles.

[@mtebaldi1]

So this video is a T90 advertisement I guess.

[@michaelmullins7327]

Russian t90 is nothing more than scrap metal on tracks

[@MichaelNichols-ec9pt]

See that incline of the gun barrel...we used to call those folks "duck hunters" back in the day. LOL

[@gregorycrayton3421]

What was the outcome?

[@williamphillips6779]

I guess they didn't want to show the outcome - the fireball with the T90 turret flying through the air.

[@JamesBrisco-mm6kc]

Why is this M1 tank being remotely being fired

[@williamphillips6779]

Stock footage. Before firing the full powered service rounds after a set period of time, the gun is fired remotely by the unit Master Gunner without a turret crew to certify that the gun can still withstand the extreme pressures of the more powerful charge. I remember being told that the Germans (who designed the gun) don't like using the US ammunition because ours is "hotter" than the original design.

[@Tetelestai0030]

Even IF the t-90 had won. It is the most modern and advanced tank Russia has to put forward. The M1 that Ukraine has is at least 20 years old and far removed from its most recent iteration.

[@geordiegeorge9041]

What a load of BS whoever made this has no idea what he is talking about.

[@larryselkirk426]

Who wrote this nonsense? AI?

[@LIONIQ-foxhound]

He is talking here over a hypothetical scenario that did not happen... the m1 abrams is a huge beast with a high profile (although lower than its predecessor m60) and a large cross-section, which makes it an easy target to discover and distinguish and 🎯 from a longer distances, however, this beast still possesses some operational and tactical advantages and qualities such as high speed, excellent acceleration, and reverse speed and a low engine sound signature, coupled with advanced protection level and modern fire control system connected to advance multi channel sighting system... In general, the Ukrainian theater of operations helps Russian tanks show some of their advantages on the basis that they are historically designed to operate in topographically complex theaters of operations extending from western european continent to the western of Russian, where the density of vegetation limits the horizontal visibility and helps tanks set up mobile ambushes for the other enemy weapon systems and formations, especially the AFVs... (Of course, this is after excluding changes brought to the battlefield environment by the tremendous development that FPVs have introduced in tactical and operational reconnaissance capabilities)... Now everyone is waiting for such a engagement, but of course by using APFSDS munitions and not with HEAT, which was used by the Russian army against the M1Abrams, and the rest of western supplied AFVs, either through FPVs or ATGMs and in some case's even GLATGMs... It is assumed that the designing preferences, advanteges and qualities of the t90 (and older Soviet era tanks going back to the t64) in terms of lower profile, small cross-section and thus small dimensions should proves it self in those theaters of operations and should play in favor of the t90m which enjoy the protection of the latest generation of the Russian reactive armor suits the Relikt (4S23), coupled with advanced fire control system and two third generation infrared sighting system one standard for the gunner and the other CITV for the commander, beside most (if not all) of the direct the engagements, across the Ukrainian theaters of operations happens from distances not exceeding the 2000 meters, which in turn should enhance or increase the penetration capabilities of kinetic energy munitions fired by Russian tanks...

[@mcp121]

Active protection systems stop missiles, but are too slow to stop tank rounds. This is trash info.

[@tonyjf9097]

Dude get your facts right, the systems you say are on the junk T90 are not. What happened to the showdown?

[@flingmonkey5494]

How many T90's do the Russians have and what is their production of new tanks like? I have heard that they re suffering from inability to access the computer electronics necessary to produce new vehicles, and without the microprocessors the tanks are useless. So do their losses outstrip their ability to replace? Also, what is the overall reliability of the T90. I have heard that during the later period of WWII the vaunted Tiger tanks had major reliability issues along with very long repair times, I heard that the average miles to transmission failure was less than one tank of gas and repair times stretched into weeks or months (problematic in the heat of battle.) How does the T90 stack up?

[@gertfeikens7311]

Russian propaganda sounding like WW2 Nazi propaganda.

[@lancemangham997]

This didn’t happen

[@tonyp2865]

Fact. Deal with it.

[@RobertElsasser-j2u]

Russia still has T90 tanks with the Jack in the Box turrets? Lol. Garbage

[@RonaldPlott]

This is not worth watching, just go read any electronic libary. The M1A1 Abrams in Ukraine are also a weakened armor version with the depleted uranium portion removed. What does the logistic problem of only having APFSDS shells and no HE and trying to blow a house apart have to do with the tank's capability? To the best of my knowledge no tank is drone proof, they all have weak spots, and these tank protective system are not that effective against APFSDS shells, really designed to intercept missiles.

[@guyh.4553]

This is filled with so much false information. To start, the T-90M was & is not very abundant on the battlefields. At the opening of the war, it was rare to even see a T-90 or a T-80. Dont take this verbatim but going in, there was something like 190 T-90s available for combat at the offset. And that was because of their rocky history of breakdowns and non-functioning key components. Then there was the reactivate armor where 2/3rds of the armor was nothing but empty boxes as the corrupt military leaders embezzled so much that Russia couldn't field the armor as designed. As for rolling into Ukraine in devastating Ukraine. Ukraine, going into the war, was heavy on the T-70s & T-64s. As was and is Russia still. At 4:50, I had to stop this.... whatever the hell this false information and lie filled video is as I was about to throw up! I would HIGHLY RECOMMEND that KZbin remove this video for the amount of false information it contains.

[@josephnoneofyourbeeswax8517]

Single tanks move tactically, not strategically.

[@leeharrison2722]

Among the many things wrong with this video, the M1A1 is not the M1A2. It has the 105 gun, not the 120. It is also less heavily armored.

[@davidnemoseck9007]

The M1 had the 105. By the time of the A1 version, it had the 120.

[@williamphillips6779]

The M1A1 was the first of the Abrams to have the M256 120mm smoothbore gun. The 105mm was only on the M1 and M1IP versions.

[@davidgardner863]

The same stock footage clips shown over and over again got pretty boring.

[@Parawata]

started falling asleep so took a look at the comments. Pointless video, tells you what you already know and 5 min in no closer to this mythical showdown.

[@richwalter3107]

Fight this shit by reporting it as disinformation or misleading

[@mikedowney2168]

The turrets on the Russian tanks go pop. Junk

[@Chef-Chad]

Well the T-90 can't withstand a one way drone LOL, what crap

[@peterblood50]

The T-14 "...was retired from the battlefield early in the year for additional upgrades." Exactly 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 💙💛

[@americameinyourmouth9964]

Ive never seen a turret toss of an Abrams. But ive seen many T90s critically detonate and turret toss because it doesnt vent the ammo explosion out the back like the Abrams.

[@3nity89]

t90m has explosive reactive armor not some made up "arena active protection system"

[@cat22_a1]

You're repeating the same info over and over

[@billdunson4174]

The T90 is a pos, turret launching door stop

[@markl8111]

The T90 is a meat pot, destroyed easily by drones, and simple hand grenades. This is bad, week propaganda.

[@antlamaki1108]

'',,, the best tank is the one with best crew,,,'' Well, it's an very old military wisdom that tells: better trained always wins.....

[@janmichael1262]

I think you mean the " impenetrable shield of BRITSH engineering"

[@jrcicirello]

After making my initial comment, I started reading the comments of other watchers. Your channel will start losing viewers if you don’t start reporting real news and producing authentic information concerning war. Get your head out of your ass and stop with click bait titles and provide real facts that most of your viewers know. This channel is being slammed because of all the false facts discussed in this video and the fact no showdown was ever aired.

[@lorenhamstra5964]

I think this channel must be a Russian bot.