History of the Niqab III: Early Islamic Sources

People may be shocked to discover that early Islamic sources did not recommend the covering of the face or hands. In fact, research shows that the majority of scholars thought that niqab was quite impractical. Find out more.
*English KZbin: / taimurrahman1975
*Instagram: / taimur_laal
*Twitter: / taimur_laal

[@umarbajwa5889]

sir i am your youtube student just wana tell i respect you alot for your work

[@bashirahmad9166]

Dr Sb, your audience can understand how difficult is to talk on cultural issues in a religiously exploited society.

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Yes, it is not without risk to talk on this kind of topics in that Country which is under Siege of Ignoramus Sectarian Mullah-Mafia*

[@ummeali2092]

Actually, some audience surprised by listening malma-talks.( According to souratul alinaam, 112)

[@samarfatima1348]

desparately waiting for your next video. it's a great series...please continue to make such useful videos...

[@sheikhhashimi5082]

Salaamun Alykum I am student of Al-Qur'aan. I appreciate your information base on the facts, logical and practical as well as tangible. With peace

[@AhmedJalbani]

Sir well done ... appriciate you on this series ..

[@ChefbyMistake]

Hijab/ Purdah / MathaBanna was always used by the elite Persian women in the Subcontinent. African women still don’t cover themselves in some regions.

[@Alburr250]

Taimur Sahib. I recommend these three books: 1. speaking in God’s name 2. And God knows the soldiers 3. The Search for the beauty in Islam All written by Dr Khaled Abou El Fadl - who is a trained jurist and a lawyer in the US. He has covered the topics of Awrah in great depth and can reference his assertions from old Classical Arabic manuscripts. Awrah is a very complex and a very heavily debated topic in classical Islam. Just like in Assyrian law, in Islamic jurisprudence, slave women and free women had different Awrahs. Furthermore Muhammad Asad’s footnotes in his Quranic commentary elaborates on 24.31, and 33.59. He gives a very flexible interpretation.

[@ajabkhan6030]

تیمور صاحب السلام علیکم میں نقاب کے بارے میں آپ کے لیکچر سن رہا آج سن رہا ہوں آدم سے لے کر رسول کریم تک ایک لاکھ چوبیس ہزار پیغمبر آئے تھے ان سب کی تعلیمات کے اثرات پردے نقاب کے بارے میں تمام معاشروں میں موجود تھے آپ اپنی وضاحت فرمائیں یوسف پشاور

[@hussaindarvlogs8518]

Bhai ap ne un ki baat thik se nai suni woh sirf yeh nai keh rahe k niqab pre muhammad saw era mein majood tha balke yeh tak bata rahe hein k uss ki wajah koi prophet ka order nai tha balke assirian empire ka ghulam aur upper class women mein difference paida karne k liye banaya gaya rule tha

[@Silicone5432]

Very Good Informative Analysis

[@Faiza_Saleh]

Sir shukr guzar hen hm aap ky k aap wapis tareekh k panno ko khol samny rakh rahy hen or references k sath itna acha analysis dy rahy hen or hm smjh rahy hen k kesy hijab or niqab ko islam ki alamat banaya gya or orton ko apni pakizgi sabat krny k lye kesy thopaa gya in traditional ulama ki trf se yeh log broader perspective me nai dkahty bs hr jagha apni insecurities or ghuttan zada soch orton py musallat krny a jaty Quran ki ayton k tarjumy apni marzi se krty takay pardy k name py orton ko control kia jaye jabky islam me modesty hy decency hy or choice hy limit me reh hm se wo choice cheenii gyii or sakhtii ki gyii pehli baar aap se itni different baten sunny ko mili now its clear its women choice to wear with modesty and chastity. Thank you sir

[@jamal1844]

This is the best part of Niqab & it’s well explained. Thank you so much 🙏🙏🙏

[@uzmapirzada5060]

Niqab or head covering is more cultural than religious. We do not find any evidence of segregation during prayer times or otherwise, in the times of prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Till the times of companions, there is no such evidence from history that women were forced to cover head through law, though laws of Omar's times are well documented.

[@Alburr250]

Segregation is definitely not from the time of the Prophet SAW. It was practiced in Byzantine and Persia amongst the elite women who were secluded and didn’t leave their homes or palaces. The peasant women were very socially mobile. Even in Pakistan, you can see the lower class women who work as maids or sweepers or nurses - they are very socially mobile.

[@beyondthemountain2]

Excellent work doc sb❤

[@hanantareen-t1t]

Nicely explained ❤ Waiting for next episode

[@uzmapirzada5060]

thank you for touching this topic.

[@dainali1318]

Favorite acedemic KZbinr

[@shahbazawan908]

really great explanation sir

[@tariqaziz783]

Great lecture,,

[@AshherWaqiAlMahdi]

Excellent work Sir, As A student ,writer and Researcher, I love to Thank You For this fruitful Brainstorming Session's for Pakistani extremist society

[@nabilislam165]

I don't know English so my writing is will wrong, but I want to say that Mr taimur sir is a intellectual person. I understand Urdu his lecture listen to me is very easy. I am from Bangladesh and a student of political science.

[@uzmapirzada5060]

With conquering lands, Muslims adopted a lot of things from other cultures. With monarchy in Islam, a lot of such practices were adopted by aristocratic women, which were then followed by other women. Even then, niqab was not much practiced by common Muslim women till seventeenth century BC, as much as I could learn from history. At that time christian and jew women were practicing head covering in Europe, too.

[@SR-Ranjha105]

Sir it is one of the most complete historical analysis of the history of Niqab and Hijab about Women with proper references. I salute your evidences. What is your final say?? Are you favouring a Hijab and not a Niqab??

[@Taimur_Laal]

Thank you. I think the most interesting section is coming up in the next two episodes :) Keep watching.

[@abdar-rahman6965]

What Dr. Taimur has uploaded about Niqab is invaluable info. Great Job. I loved it. Mr. Ranjha: are you ready to face and digest truth? If you are, then listen: Prophet Mohammad, 4 Caliphs and all companions of Prophet left behind only written Quran. They did not leave behind even one page of Sunnah, Hadiths, Asbab-Nazool, Fiqh, Seera and Tafsir. This kind of all extra-Quranic books were CONCOCTED at that time, when Rasool was no more, 4 caliphs were died, and even all Sahaaba were dead; and there was no one ALIVE who could authenticate those stories which we find in Six Books of Sunni sect and 4 Books of Shia sects. They were Pseudo Persian Imams of defeated Zoroastrian Ancestry who concocted those books 220-400 years after the death of Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him) in order to send people astray. They revenged for their defeat because they were Muslim Generals who dismantled their a millennia old Zoroastrian Sassanian Empire. *Therefore; for the matter of Islam; we Muslims MUST seek guidance only from that Quran which is made Easy **54:40**, is fully detailed 6:114, and is Complete 16:89. ANY RITE, RITUAL 2:177, 2:115, or Islamic law which does not have roots in Noble Quran is NOT part of Deen al-Islam* So, let we see now, what does Quran say about Hijab. Will you not wonder that though in several verses of Quran, word HIJAB is used but in no any verse, word Hijab is used for Niqab, or Buraq or Frumka (Burqa of Orthodox Jewish women) or even head cover! In Quran, word Hijab means: curtain. Like if you invite your relatives on marriage of your son, there must be curtain between men and women. That is Hijab of Quran. Hijab of Quran has no any relation with Attire/dress of woman. So, that whole Dogma of Hijab for woman is FABRICATED by Sectarian-Mullah-Mafia which is based on millions of fabricated hadiths. Glorious Quran which is TRUTH of all truths, ordains man and woman NOT TO GAZE each other (except married couples). Quran ordains ladies to cover their Chest. Quran ordains ladies to wear longer dress. So miniskirts etc. are not permitted. *The Deen al-Islam which was preached by all Prophets including Moses and Jesus **3:19**, 3:85, 42:3, **42:13**, 6:125, **39:22**, 10:72, 3:67, 2:130-140, 10:84, **3:52**, 22:78, 2:105-106, **5:48**, **48:28** is Simple and Straight but Clergy has converted Islam into a complex difficult dogma by blending in Islam their tons and tons of Fake Sharia laws.* *Remember:* *Any Rite, Ritual or Sharia law which does not have roots in Quran has no relation with Islam.* Some examples are below: 1- Salat is not any kind of Namaz which was imported from Zoroastrians during Abbasid era and then was validated through fabricated hadith of Funny Flying Horse "Buraq". Quran tells in 2:115, 2:177 that God is Omnipresent and this Namaz Pooja-Pot=IDOL WORSHIP is not a Good deed but Good deed is to be Muslim and then be Philanthropist 2:177. To prostrate to Kaaba is 101% Shirk = Idol worship. No any verse of Quran ordains to prostrate to Kaaba which is made of Stones. This Idol Worship is introduced by Clergy (as was said by Sir Syed too). 2- During Hajj, kissing black stone and walking seven rounds around Kaaba (made of stones), are rites of Pre-Quranic Meccan Pagans. Quranic Hajj is simple. It is just a little more than to pay a visit to Masjid-al-Haraam=GHQ of Islam=Qibla 3- Quran never forbids men from Silver and Gold and Hareer 4- Quran never forbids you from good Music (Poetry must not violates codes of Quran) 5- Quran never ordains you to have beard. It is Culture which exists among all religions. 6- In whole Quran, term "Sunnah of Rasool" never appears nor Quran ordains to follow Sunnah of mortal man 18:110 Mohammad PBUH. That term "Sunnah of Rasool" is invented by Sunni and Shia sects. 7- Quran does talk about Oswat-Hasana of Rasool which is incorporated within ethical codes of Quran. This is why: neither Rasool nor Sahaaba left behind any extra-Quranic manuscript of Oswat-Hasana. Even Aisha RA said that THE QURAN is Akhlaaq of Rasool-Allah القرآن فإن خلق رسول الله Please read Quranic verse 17:9

[@Zainmx1]

So how is bukhari referenced then? Where does his chain of sources end up because, as you rightly pointed out, everyone was dead when he wrote those books

[@abdar-rahman6965]

@@Zainmx1 Zoroastrian Forger Bukhari who was indeed a Munafiq of Sabaite Baatni Tehreek forged his book 220 years after the death of Last Prophet Mohammad Peace be upon him. No any even one Sahaabi was alive to authenticate stories of Bukhari. 220 years is long time. He forged Matan of Hadiths, and a person who can forge Matan of Hadiths, it is not difficult for him to forge also Chain/Isnad of Hadiths. And there is NO ANY Methods to check Authenticity of Chain/Isnad. I give you one example: We read in book falsely labeled as Sahih-Muslim (It is book of lies) that Gama heard from Obama, he heard from Sama, he heard from Maja he heard from Saja, he heard from Abu Potato, he heard from Abu Tomato who said: that Sahaabi Abi Zar told him that Rasool said: Blacks dogs are Shaitan. Now, there is only one way to check the authenticity of that hadith, and that way is: to approach Abi Zar and ask him: Sir: did you really hear that story from Rasool? But Muslim bin Hajjaj who forged his Sahih-Muslim could never approach Abi Zar because Abi Zar was dead at that time when Muslim bin Hajjaj forged that hadith of black dog. Besides, through commonsense and reason, it can be judged that, that story of Black dog was forged by any Munafiq who also forged Isnad, and then attached that story with the name of great man 68:4 Mohammad PBUH in order to defame him. Black color of dog is natural color. It can not be Shaitan just due to its color! May be, other narrators mentioned in this hadiths had never told that story. Someone just added their names in Isnad. Therefore, even one hadith cannot be classified as Sahih. All are hearsay folkloric tales mostly forged by people of Book, Zanadqa and Zoroastrians. Ibn Asakar writes in his book History of Damascus, that a Zindiq was brought to Caliph Harun Rashid Abbasi, and Caliph ordered Jallad to finish him. At that time, that Zindiq shouted: _O Amir al-Momeneen: do you know that I have forged thousands hadiths in which I made those things Halal which Quran has made Haram, I made those things Haram which Quran has made Halal_ Just see, Gold and Silver and Hareer are halal for man in Quran, but Fabricated hadiths make those Haram for man. According to Quran, dead or alive locust is Haram but forged hadiths made dead locust Halal.

[@abdar-rahman6965]

@@Zainmx1 Without any Doubt, Six authors of Books of 6 Sunni books were Zoroastrian Munafiq of Baanti Tehreek. Books of Shia even stink more. I give you some examples, and after reading these example, think honestly, what is the truth. Example 01 In Quran, God has witnessed that Last Prophet used to have best sublime conduct 68:4 but Bukhari writes that Prophet tried to commit suicide several time. Can a Muslim stuff this kind of blasphemous tales in his book? No. never Example 02: In order to create doubt in Quranic Wahi, and, and in order to mock Rasool, Bukhari writes: wahi of Quran was not coming to Rasool unless he used to wear Thob (Long Shirt of Arabic woman) of Aisha RA. Can a Muslim stuff this kind of blasphemous tales in his book? No. never Example 03: Rasool was bound to follow commandment of Quran 6:114, 66:1, 10:15. Quran commands Husbands not to have sex with Wife during Fasting of Ramadan and during her menses but Bukhari writes: Rasool used to have sex with wives even during Fast and menses. Can a Muslim stuff this kind of blasphemous tales in his book? No. never I can post here another 500 examples but post will be very long

[@electron1237]

Sir kesy hn....sir Education policies of pakistan and theories of education pr bhi series bnayen plz

[@HarisA1i]

Kmaal ki research sir g❤

[@AbuDurum]

I want to mention to you a very rare opinion found in the tafsir of Ibn Ashur in the ayah of khimar. He says that some of the scholars were of the opinion that the dhaahira (that which is apparent/can be shown) also includes the feet and the hair. However he gives no reference to who these scholars are. Another thing I want to say is that there is no agreed upon evidence (hadith are not agreed upon) that the hair has to be covered. The ayah just says that they should take the khumur and cover their juyub. But a khimar is just a headcovering, and it can be worn without covering all of the hair, as commentators have mentioned. So scholars who said that it means that the hair should also be covered because it says "khimar" actually havent provided any justification for that. Secondly, the ayah can be read as something prescriptive or descriptive. What I mean is that it may be that women back then customarily wore a khimar, and then they didn't cover the jayb, so they were told to take the khimar and cover their jayb, not understood as that they MUST do it with a khimar, but just that this is what they were already wearing, but it could be something else that covers the jayb, point is that the jayb has to be covered, and not necessarily with a khimar. In the same way that there is an ayah that says that the Muslims should have steeds of war as a deterrence against their enemies. Now everyone reads that as being descriptive and not prescriptive, as having steeds of war would make no sense today, today you would have tanks, rockets etc., so it's just describing what was common back then and not insisting upon it being steeds, but the point is to build up amarment to deter the enemies. The book "Speaking in God's Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women" by Khaled Abou El Fadl has a lot of references about opinions on niqab, headcovering etc. that are not commonly known among lay Muslims (and sometimes even scholars).

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Gentleman: you are supposed not to trade in a desert. You have Book of God which Prophet and all Sahaaba only left behind. They left behind not a single page of Hadith. All hadiths are made-up fairytales. Instead of following these Mullahs and Imams, just see, what does Quran say on this subject. In 24:31, God has commanded Women to cover Chest. Not head or wear Burqa or Niqab In 24: 31 we read وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَىٰ جُيُوبِهِنَّ Word Yadrib never tells to draw or pull a Chadar or Dubbatta on Chest >> جُيُوبِهِنَّ This word says: Put cover on Chest جُيُوبِهِنَّ word بِخُمُرِ has roots in Khamar=Wine >> Which *covers* the mind of man. Here word بِخُمُرِ is telling, *cover* the chest. PUT COVER ON CHEST وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَىٰ جُيُوبِهِنَّ In verse 33:59, Quran has not used word وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ but has used يُدْنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَـٰبِيبِهِنَّ Pull/draw Jilbab >> a Long Shirt of Woman like Thob

[@Taimur_Laal]

Thank you for that excellent feedback.

[@AbuDurum]

@@Taimur_Laal, now that I hopefully have your attention, I just want to express that I hope you some day make the political philosophy playlist in an English version. Unfortunately I don't understand Urdu, but from your English content I think you're a good speaker and educator.

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Arabic-English Lexicon by Edward William Lane (d. 1876) جيب 1 جَابَ, aor. ـِ see 1 in art. جوب, in two places.2 جيّب, inf. n. تَجْيِيبٌ: see 1 in art. جوب. جَيْبٌ The طَوْق [or *opening at the neck and bosom] (K) of a shirt* (S, K) and the like; (K;) as, for instance, of a coat of mail: (TA:) or *the opening of a shirt at the uppermost part of the breast:* (Msb, MF:) *or the opening in a garment for the head to be put through:* or such an opening as a sleeve and a طَوْق: (MF:) pl. [of mult.] جُيُوبٌ, (Msb, K,) also pronounced جِيُوبٌ, (TA,) [like بِيُوتٌ for بُيُوتٌ,] and [of pauc.] أَجْيَابٌ: (Msb:) this is said to be its proper art., (K, TA,) not جوب, because its pl. is جُيُوبٌ. (TA.) *[The Arabs often carry things within the bosom of the shirt* &c.; and hence the word is now applied by them to A pocket.] B2: (assumed tropical:) *The heart; the bosom.* (K.) So in the saying, هُوَ نَاصِحُ الــجَيْبِ (assumed tropical:) [He is pure, or sincere, of heart or bosom]: (K:) or trusty, trustworthy, or faithful. (S. [See also art. نصح.]) A poet says, وَخَشَّنْتَ صَدْرًا جَيْبُــهُ لَكَ نَاصِحُ (assumed tropical:) [And thou hast exasperated a bosom the heart of which was faithful to thee]. (TA.) You say also, هُوَ دَنِسُ الــجَيْبِ (assumed tropical:) [He is a person of foul heart]. (A in art. دنس.) And رَدَعَ جَيْبَــهُ عَنْهُ (assumed tropical:) He cleared his heart, or bosom, of it. (K in art. ردع q. v.) B3: جَيْبُ الأَرْضِ (assumed tropical:) The place of entrance of the land, or country: (K:) pl. جُيُوبٌ. (TA.) جِيبَــةٌ: see art. جوب. يَاقُوتٌ مُــجَيَّبٌ Hollowed [sapphires]: occurring in a trad. describing the banks of the river of Paradise: but accord. to one reading, it is لُؤْلُؤٌ مُجَوَّبٌ; accord. to another, مُــجَيَّبٌ or مَجَوَّفٌ; and accord. to another, مُــجَيَّبٌ or مُجَوَّبٌ. (TA.

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Quran 27:12 وَأَدْخِلْ يَدَكَ فِى جَيْبِكَ تَخْرُجْ بَيْضَآءَ مِنْ غَيْرِ سُوٓءٍ فِى تِسْعِ ءَايَـٰتٍ إِلَىٰ فِرْعَوْنَ وَقَوْمِهِۦٓ إِنَّهُمْ كَانُوا۟ قَوْمًا فَـٰسِقِينَ “Now place thy hand *into thy bosom:* it will come forth [shining] white, without blemish!” [And thou shalt go] with nine [of My] messages unto Pharaoh and his people for, verily, they are people depraved!” (Asad) جَيْبِكَ >> جُيُوبِهِنَّ 24:31 >> جُيُوبِهِنَّ Quran 28:32 ٱسْلُكْ يَدَكَ فِى جَيْبِكَ تَخْرُجْ بَيْضَآءَ مِنْ غَيْرِ سُوٓءٍ وَٱضْمُمْ إِلَيْكَ جَنَاحَكَ مِنَ ٱلرَّهْبِ فَذَٰنِكَ بُرْهَـٰنَانِ مِن رَّبِّكَ إِلَىٰ فِرْعَوْنَ وَمَلَإِي۟هِۦٓ إِنَّهُمْ كَانُوا۟ قَوْمًا فَـٰسِقِينَ “[And now] put thy hand *into thy bosom:* it will come forth [shining] white, without blemish. And [henceforth] hold thine arm close to thyself, free of all fear. “These, then, shall be the two signs [of thy bearing a message] from thy Sustainer unto Pharaoh and his great ones - for, behold, they are people depraved!” (Asad) جَيْبِكَ >> جُيُوبِهِنَّ 24:31 جُيُوبِهِنَّ Jayyub >> 24:31 is plural of Jayyab >> 28:32, 27:12 Notes: Miracles shown in these two verses can be explained by Quantum Mechanics. When you do not look/observe a lion, that is a wave of Quantum Cloud but when you observe it, wave collapses, and now it seems to you a Lion. Whole world is of illusionary nature. *Who collapses that wave? He is whom Greatness is the Greatest. He is Kabeer-al-Muta'aal. No leaf falls but He knows it **6:59* When I am not observing Dr. Taimur, he is mere a wave of Quantum Cloud but when I observe him, wave collapses, and he appears as beautiful Dr. Taimur. In the same way, Staff of Moses appeared as a big snake, and his hand appeared as Shining hand Quran 3:185 Every soul will taste of death. And ye will be paid on the Day of Resurrection only that which ye have fairly earned. Whoso is removed from the Fire and is made to enter Paradise, he indeed is triumphant. *The life of this world is but comfort of illusion.*

[@sheikhhashimi5082]

My humble advice to you to record English version too.

[@uzmapirzada5060]

A woman's chastity is based on the same principles as of men, according to Quran. Head covering at that time was a necessary part of their outfit, for both man and women, Quran asked to extend it to bossoms with a stress on covering bosoms not covering head.

[@SDSen]

Evidence?

[@parhloyaar]

what about covering head? hijab (head covering) is this also related to history or does Islam say to cover head?

[@Taimur_Laal]

Jee. I explained in the previous video that in Arabia, men and women generally covered their head owing to the extreme heat. Hence, this was not really a subject of much debate.

[@Faizayul]

You see how he tries to be sly? He's using the argument of weather. Like in order to avoid heat strokes people used to wear hijab and turbans While our argument is of One God sending multiple prophets giving relatively same commandments. Head covering is also found in Punjabi and Indian civilization where there are 4 seasons and monsoon once a year. Stop deleting my comments you buffoon you're not fooling anyone. Mr. Freedom of speech 😂

[@fsu3328]

@@Taimur_Laal but it's clearly says in the Quran about head covering are you seriously mad you are twisting the word of Allah SWT c

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@fsu3328 beg to differ. The subject of the ayat is covering one’s adornments and jayyub.

[@fsu3328]

@@Taimur_Laal isn't that the head covering it's clear to me. I don't agree with niqab as it's no where in Islam but julbaya is definitely

[@imtiazahmad6694]

شاندار کام ہے آپ کا ❤

[@theunbiased6861]

it will be great if you can politely cover what is the satar of slave women in islam

[@StarGazer-h1i]

It will be great if you can also mention imam Jafar sadiq point of view.

[@OmerKhan1]

@Taimur_Laal once again going in the deep end to piss off the non-secular. I’m using the term non-secular very loosely and you know exactly what I mean.

[@babarazam900]

👌👌❤️❤️ Love it sir

[@alizahaib441]

Sir, why you do not mention jafari school ?

[@Taimur_Laal]

My knowledge about it is very limited.

[@ummeali2092]

سورتہ الاحزاب، آیت 59: جو عورت مومنین کی لسٹ میں شامل ہو گی وہ اس آیت کے تحت حجاب میں ہو گی۔

[@2AN3M]

After this please explain the history of child marriages.

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Quran never permits Child Marriage. And Hadiths are Fabricated tales

[@ummeali2092]

ہاتھ، پائوں اور چہرہ محرم کے سامنے کھولا جاتا ہے نا محرم کے سامنے نہیں۔ کیا محرم اور غیر محرم برابر ہو گئے؟

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@ummeali2092 depends on the school of thought.

[@tahirtahir6813]

Sir well done but the references are not correct........

[@mohemmedkhan3401]

جعفری نکتہ نظر کیوں بیان نہیں کیا ؟ امام خمینی بھی چھرہ ہاتھ اور پاؤں کے پردے کو لازم قرار نہیں دیتے

[@Taimur_Laal]

My apologies. Only because my own knowledge is limited.

[@Babasayee]

No needs our experience eyes 👀 down mean respect for others parada begin one's people's hides I'd and we can't soroh chuppana is waqat confused about in head cover is aloud but depends on the person who's don't want rumali Pakistan Make this city selling billion's Make and sell Dunia ARB and Indonesia Malaysia and many population and can't wearing so naked not aloud because boys or people's who aways from pairs or behind the door he we should respect others people's right and More peace and safe from

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Quran never ordains ladies for Head-Cover, Burqa or Niqab. This is made by Mullahs. Quran tells lady to Cover Chest and wear longer dress

[@m.mustafakhattak2372]

Ver nice explanation sir. I am now adays living in Beijing and I have free time to read some books. If you can suggest some of the Philosophical and history books, I will thankful. Stay blessed.

[@Taimur_Laal]

Read Ideas by Peter Watson.

[@ammazkhan7586]

Here's a small list: - Meditations by Marcus Aurelius - The Prince by Nicollo Machiavelli - The Muqaddimah - Any book by William Dalrymple

[@m.mustafakhattak2372]

Thank you

[@8lec_R]

Ilan Pappe has great books on Palestine and Israel.

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Before reading any man-made book, Read and also UNDERSTAND Quran which is the Truth of all truths. Because, Quran is your Key to paradise 17:9; not other books

[@Faizayul]

Watch Engineers lecture 161-b to actually understand the history of hijab and niqab from the time of the Prophet rather than just googling on the internet like a kid

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Mirza Engr is just another IMPOSTOR of Pak

[@manahil558]

Tell us what problems you find in this lecture instead of telling us to watch someone else's lecture. Provide the counter arguments and address the issues. That's not how you object.

[@Faizayul]

@@manahil558 it's a two hour long in-depth detailed lecture with almost 50-60 hadiths. You want me to write all of that down here? It has all the references from all the primary sources that nobody of the scholarship could object to. The professor is doing a horrible job of explaining the history of niqab without delving into the primary sources of texts on which Muslim scholars and jurists rely upon which is not very scholarly. Just because one can make slides by copy pasting and read some online selective material and quote it here doesn't mean he's done a good job explaining it. The video I mentioned has all the arguments made by classical scholars and moderate scholars as well as modernist scholars and are refuted in the light of primary source material

[@intazario]

​@@Faizayul He isn't making a case for legality. He is simply showing how opinions changed. He said so in the start.

[@Faizayul]

@@intazario this is why it is disingenuous of him. Doing a history of Niqab with the connotations of it being a cultural thing rather than being a Godly command sent to previous generations. And he is lying though his teeth. He is a Marxist. Marxist believe in absolute equality in the end of their struggle. And he concludes by saying absolute equality means the end of niqab.

[@kumailnaqvi3234]

❤❤❤❤

[@user-my4kt3nm8x]

❤🇧🇩

[@ummeali2092]

سورتہ الانعام ، آیت 112 کے مطابق یہ سب ملمع کی ہوئی فریبہ، چکنی چپڑی باتیں ہیں

[@farazsiddiqui5491]

کوشش عمدہ ہے مگر سوال پیدا ہوتا ہے کہ ایک فلسفہ پڑھانے والا اور معیشت کا عالم اس طرح مذہبی باتوں پر کیوں اتنا وقت لگا رہا ہے؟ نیت پر شک نہیں مگر سمجھ نہیں آرہا کہ کیا وجہ ہے؟

[@ummeali2092]

وجہ ایک ہی ہے ملمع کاری کا فریب، بمطابق سورتہ الانعام: 112

[@indy500tabasco8]

👽👽👽👽🌏👽👽👽👽

[@mohammadjatoi8662]

Abey engineer jaise fundamentaList Aur Extremist ko sune sey Lot better hay progressive Aur Moderate Lal Taimur ko Suna jaaaye

[@abdar-rahman6965]

engineer is a Dajjal

[@Taimur_Laal]

Thank you for your kind words for me. From my personal experience with Mohammed Ali, I can assure you that he is not an extremist but a very tolerant person.

[@mohammadjatoi8662]

@@Taimur_Laal my PLeasure!!not a problem!Youre weLcome!

[@mohammadjatoi8662]

@@Taimur_Laal much Love and appreciation from Canada

[@Faizayul]

So.. the Umm'ul Mu'mineen, mothers of the believers are not ideals for the muslim women to follow? Should we then take your worthless opinion and your wife as our ideal? -Khimar is a covering for your Mahrams excluding your husband. -While Jilbaab is a covering for non-Mahrams.

[@abdar-rahman6965]

You are Ignorant. Understand Quran and get educated. Do not follow Fabricated hadiths. Prophet and Sahaaba left behind no hadiths; only Quran. Jilbaab is not Niqab or Burqa. Just see picture of Jilbaab in Google. Umm'ul Mu'mineen, mothers of the believers followed Quran, so understand Quran. Word Khimar is used in 24:31 to cover Chest. It is not Burqa or Niqab.

[@Faizayul]

​@@abdar-rahman6965 You are a quranist and a gen z netizen who loves google and wikipedia and if you only believe in quran and not the hadiths you are a straight kaffir and there's concensus of all the scholars of Islam. Google is not an authority on Islam. Google to see the Jilbab? So google has 1400 years old pictures of jilbabs? Really? Burqa, Hijab, Abaya, Niqaab and Chador are modern forms of the two classics i.e. Khimaar and Jilbaab.

[@Taimur_Laal]

Choice is yours.

[@Faizayul]

@@Taimur_Laal We choose the authentic hadiths of the Prophet s.a.w on your karl max any day buddy. Heretics like you feel the need to reform Islam to fit into your worldview and all of them have been dealt with. Alhamdulilah. May you be reunited with your father karl max in the afterlife. And us with the Prophet s.a.w

[@abdar-rahman6965]

In Quran, those commands are clear which are for all Muslims/Muslim Women, and those Commands which are Only for Umm'ul Mu'mineen. For example: For a zani, there is punishment of 100 Lashes in Quran but for Umm'ul Mu'mineen that punishment in Quran is 200 lashes, Now, will your mothers and sisters follow role model of 200 lashes? The command "to stay in homes" is also ONLY for Umm'ul Mu'mineen; not for all Women. When Quran uses words يَـٰنِسَآءَ ٱلنَّبِىِّ like in 33:32, that commandment was only for Umm'ul Mu'mineen. People like you do not understand Quran whole life but run blindly after Jaahil Mullahs and after those fabricated books which neither Rasool left behind not any Sahaabi left behind. You guys do not use your reason. Dr. Taimur has so beautifully explained whole subject of Niqab; so simply and so beautifully that a person with even half brain can understand, that Niqab has no any relation with Islamic law. But, yet this so clear lecture of Dr. Taimur has not entered in your head because people like you have nothing inside the head. The place where, brain is supposed to exist in head; there are existing, your Mullahs. Quran has given example of People like you in verse 7:179 Quran 7:179 _And most certainly have We destined for hell many of the invisible beings and men who have hearts with which they fail to grasp the truth, and eyes with which they fail to see, and ears with which they fail to hear. _*_They are like cattle_*_ -nay, they are even less conscious of the right way: it is they, they who are the [truly] heedless!_ (Dr. Mohammad Asad PhD)

[@jitendrasinghcharan5275]

Jb tk aap jaise socialist, Quran aur hadees ki roshni me modern civilized social morality ko approve aur judge krne ki Nakam kosis krege... Ye badkismati he ki

[@Taimur_Laal]

I didn't quite understand your point.

[@khansahib8028]

​@@Taimur_Laalbkws krrha h sir choren

[@abdar-rahman6965]

Rasool and his companions left behind only written Quran; not a single page of Sunnah and Hadiths. All hadiths are mere hearsay folkloric tales mostly of people of Book and Zoroastrians. Quran never ordains Niqab or Burqa. That is mere Culture. What Dr. Taimur has said is PURE TRUTH. Follow Truth, not Mullahs nor millions of forged hadiths.

[@babarazam900]

​Ap choren isy . Band zehen Hai bakwas he krty Hai sir yeh