The Mystery Of This 1903 Photograph Is Shocking! What You See Will Give You Goose Bumps

[@gm4an]

Why do you switch the images, it's just stupid, makes no sense at all. And makes the video unwatchable imo.

[@mycroftsanchez901]

I just commented the same thing, ruins the video for no good reason!

[@xxxsaraHelloxxx]

Thanks. Out

[@RonRay]

If you would stop flipping the pictures, we might have time to observe the objects we came here to see! 😡

[@briandecarlo1847]

From what I read about the picture at 12:00 was that in 1917, although u say it was from 1903. Maybe this is a different story. But what ai have read is that The Blessed Mother appeared in front of 3 children and would have a conversation with them. She told them 3 secrets, told them to pray the Rosary for world peace and one last thing. The 3 children and 70,000 people also witnessed an atmosphere event called The Miracle Of The Sun. Which is this picture. I have heard of this before, but I found all this info on Google. If u want to check it out for yourself. Also, there is a channel called Catholic 365. There is a video that talks about this

[@MemphisOne44]

I thought the same thing when I saw this picture. Our Lady of Fatima.

[@miapdx503]

Thank you. Someone with good sense was watching...

[@barryk8969]

Why keep mirroring images? Quick way to double content? Lots of content hunters do it, wish they wouldn’t. It belittles the presentation.

[@sheilakirby5616]

DAMN IT CERN STOP OPENING PORTHOLES THAT WHO KNOWS WHAT COULD COME THROUGH *** I TRULY DON'T WANT TO BE THE 😿 THAT HAS TO DIE IN THE NAME OF CURIOSITY ***

[@thevoid6818]

They have a cabin in the woods.

[@LiquidBearsGG]

10:58 this has been debunked. There a plenty of videos showing it was a women in the photo. There are other photos he took that day showing the woman wearing a white dress that looks like that. It was probably a double exposure or the woman was for enough away he didn’t notice she was indeed behind his daughter. This channel doesn’t seem to do any research and put out a lot of false information.

[@genealogist1948]

#9 This photo is obviously taken indoors, not outdoors in the garden, d/t curtains, small table under the window, dinner table and lit candles.

[@bonniemoerdyk9809]

Yes, that's when I decided not to listen to this robot's malarkey anymore. Some people will use anything to get likes! ~ signed, fellow genealogist ~ Bonnie Steward Moerdyk

[@napadave58]

Jesus. Why don't you guys just flip the images right upside down as opposed to just mirroring them left to right? How are we supposed to keep track of things if they move around in every other frame?

[@thepagan5432]

Solway Firth photograph was SOLVED years ago. It is the girls mother/relative facing away from the camera. She was wearing a hat.

[@swibwi]

correction it was the local bee keeper , he was a family friend and in o the joke, his name was chris,

[@thepagan5432]

@swibwi Wikipedia has it as the girls mother in a blue dress that was overexposed, which made it appear white. My original message was recalled from 8 to 10 years ago. Wikipedia has the full story, it could be wrong but that's doubtful.

[@swibwi]

aah that;s the thing with wiki any one can add to it without it being fact checked

[@thepagan5432]

@@swibwi I stated my source, what's yours ? If you search Solway Spaceman Solved, on KZbin you'll find posts saying it is the girl's mother. Some of them have really proven the point with photographic evidence. Are people on Wikipedia and KZbin telling lies to protect a non-existent beekeeper ?

[@edhaynes4107]

Photo at 12:00...the crowd is looking at a stage and the people on the stage are looking towards the crowds. Nobody seems to be paying attention to the sky. The object in the sky appears to be edited in.

[@BlanketyBlank9050]

I’m glad I read the comments first! Now I don’t have to click on a stupid video and watch it or have it in my feed! Thumbs up to commenters 👍thumbs down to the video 👎

[@nellosnook4454]

1. The Chucky Doll could possibly be featured in a future police auction of seized evidence. 2. Might as well make money off the deal.

[@TheBub26]

@11:00 that spaceman is actually the child's mother. you can see she was wearing matching attire in another photo taken then

[@danielahammel648]

Ooooh myyyyyyy god the ww2 pic is a man hold his watch up to his ear to see if its ticking it was a common practice back then and is why he was at the watch shop he probably bought or picked up his watch ugh lol

[@andrewvelonis5940]

So what were the other images in the sky in the painting? Flying squid?

[@nellosnook4454]

Maybe Elon will eventually snatch the “Black Knight” satellite? 🤔

[@Squirreltail581]

Interesting, the space shuttle could have already picked that up, long ago

[@stephenh5865]

Only one photo in the 1903 one? With all those people, not enough for me.

[@wandaTatosian]

The boys shoes with the Nike symbol is the design of the shoe and the bow is crossing over his sock, making the mark of Nike.

[@chris-r8q1j]

Sweet topic: could be a sun halo around a few clouds? Just a hunch

[@philipamacker5566]

Even if it was a cell phone..there was no towers or satellites…so no point for a phone

[@trallfraz]

in the '1903' photo, it appears to me NOBODY is looking 'up'!!!

[@dominicpardo4783]

There are dozens of ways to manipulate a photo when using a B&W negative. A first year photography student or even a hobbyist could easily achieve that result with a little dodging and burning in the darkroom.

[@LisaBeta-42]

WE own a photo of a rainbow coming out of a chalice during the holy transformation in a mass held by a catholic priest out in the open during a summer holiday with a youth group - don't look at the negative: the alledged rainbow leaves the frame of the picture and continues into the perforated rim of the film. Because - probably the camera popped open during the holidays and let light "ruin" the pictures, which led to this wonderful proof of "transformation happening for real" 😇

[@dominicpardo4783]

@LisaBeta-42 It's called reciprocity failure.

[@dominicpardo4783]

@LisaBeta-42 It's called reciprocity failure.

[@dominicpardo4783]

@LisaBeta-42 That's called reciprocity failure.

[@rafaelmadrigal1999]

Very creepy guy. To ignore this, is turning a blind eye to a problem.

[@swibwi]

in my opinion witness testimony holds a lot more value than footage when it comes to paranormal ... better the footage is the more likely it will be called fake or used in a manipulative way by the establishment , also people who'm share their encounters have nothing to gain but everything to loose generally

[@danielahammel648]

The sweet topic one i think its the sun and possibly an borealis lights that some how the camera got in the day time and the people there zoomed in really dont look like they r really looking up at it or the camera captured the radiation waves from the sun by that old camera

[@TheBub26]

mex police need to focus on the cartels, not chucky dolls!

[@Offramp-z7p]

Optical Illusion? They claim optical illusion for a possible answer to the Copper Falling Body? There is way too much detail to claim it's just something that vaguely resembles a body. Someone care to try to defend that theory?

[@andrewvelonis5940]

I think it's more like a mistake in the development process. Sometimes the film winding up on itself can press one image on to another..

[@patriciapratt6704]

pappy uk.. wht have you got a space ship that comes up when you move the curser

[@woden22]

I don't think you can use the word "otherworldly" to describe the landscape on...another world. Or, you can, but it's redundant, lazy, and stupid.

[@danielahammel648]

Nike shoes its possible a shoe maker that loved art seen that painting and had drawn up the blueprint and design of that shoe and got forgotten in time till a family member who was in the shoe making business found the blueprints and design

[@mycroftsanchez901]

WHy keep reversing the images? Totally ruins the video!

[@chuckz2934]

My thoughts are dumb video

[@Offramp-z7p]

Doesn't mean it's not entertaining.

[@BobVahn]

lots of this are old mystery . Some of it already debunked

[@jakewilson4679]

This channel used to be good, now its just lazy robot voice and repeats of the same stuff over and over 👎👎👎😮‍💨

[@linuxxr-d]

1917,,, familar year to JW's,,, satan returning to earth after being removed from heaven decending into the black stone ,, the kaaba

[@Mu5096rdgh]

The face on mars looks an awful lot like the 2 sailors on the next clip. 🤔

[@infidel202]

A i rubbish

[@adrianwalton6117]

Why can't you zoom in and clean up image of man with cell phone? Apparently the Bigfoot film from 68 I think has been cleaned n zoomed and contrasted into an unbelievably detailed close up of "Patty" from Patterson film. They could very easily pull all the detail out of this photo, how come it hasn't been done? Cuz it's horse hockey.