The Truth About Japan's New Type-10 Tank

[@richardsawyer5428]

By building your own tank you also build a skilled workforce with all the benefits that they bring to the local and national economy.

[@familyreynolds9323]

They already have a lot of that industry at home, given the production of cars and trucks that occurs in Japan. This is just leveraging off that native capability.

[@icollectstories5702]

It's certainly great -- if you can afford it. It's also a long-term issue, as you have to ask, once you've gotten this skilled workforce, what happens if defense priorities change? Like that star free agent who leaves your organization for a rival's, if you can't afford to keep the tank builders occupied, who will be recruiting them?

[@alharrison1038]

Japan is one of the most skilled industrial nations, and we need to help them gear it up again.

[@denniselvy3528]

Their build quality would be second to none or at least as good as any nato

[@CarinoGamingStudio]

not from a country that has corruption or communism

[@mimi00713]

What's amazing about the Type 10 tank is that it can fire a circling slalom shot at a small target a few kilometres away at over 40 km/h and hit every bullet. Threatening accuracy of fire.

[@hededcdn]

That's really the standard these days when looking at MBTs in the west.

[@BlackWit11]

The ship with the big ass guns was called Yamato (sistership Musashi). Isoroku Yamamoto was an influentual Japanese admiral who was instrumental in developing the naval airforce and its use of carriers and also was the architect of the plan for the attack on Pearl Harbor. Just so you know what's what!

[@christophervandenberg4830]

Never send a basic infantryman to do a job involving similar sounding words. Send a junior commissioned officer who will still get it wrong but no one will have the balls to tell him so.

[@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss]

My dad does the same mistake and he's fckin 1/2 Japanese. I actually don't care that he said Yamamoto, all it did is put a smile on my face

[@kuralulu]

The mental image of Admiral Yamamoto jumping into the battlefield all by himself with a fucking 18 inch gun strapped onto his back is hilarious. Now that’s an anime I’d watch.

[@gxssmakajax4948]

@@kuralulu XD nice idea but yea thats the first thing I noticed and scrolled down lmao

[@Bill23799]

@@autistic_m4a3_76w_hvss I'll bet dad is also concerned about his Prostrate acting up on him as he gets older. Hehe

[@muhithossain7312]

3:12 Wasn't expecting to see Memories get a mention on this channel. For those who haven't seen it, it's an anime movie with 3 different episodes that all have fantastic animation, soundtrack and damn good storylines. Definitely recommend.

[@ConReese]

Worked with the Japanese marines ARDB and they had some awesome kit. Electric dirt bikes were so cool since they were super quiet

[@imadequate3376]

My friend uses an electric dirt bike to hunt. You're damn near a ghost moving through the woods on it. Awesome piece of technology. Range could be better but for his purposes it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.

[@vodkavodka8903]

God damn i need one

[@MattBellzminion]

@@imadequate3376 And extending the Japanese army's tradition of using quiet bikes for rapid infantry movement, a tactic they employed with considerable success in their early invasive phase in WWII.

[@imadequate3376]

@@MattBellzminion the Dutch used to have guys on bikes. Honestly those electric motorcycles just rip with that instantaneous power.

[@brokeandtired]

Is it a real Japanese tank if it doesn't make you "UWU" 🤔?

[@MrWaffen007]

Yamamoto was the admiral, Yamato was the battleship. Love your stuff bud!

[@HubertofLiege]

Yamato yamawto Potato potawto

[@danieljasonkon9800]

@WaffenmeisterNZ Who do you think Chris Cappy's waifu is

[@jont2576]

love ur stuff bud!! to the guy who was a former marine, claims if he paid attention in physics class he would know what megapascal is.......yet somehow possess such an extensive knowledge in so many subjects from history,to geopolitics of various countries to battle tech and battle doctrines etc etc..... ur literally looking at a totally scripted teletubbies propaganda show written by a team of ghostwriters and fronted by a bunch of paid actors (or one in this case) and pretty faces......who probably have no idea what they are reading to the audience.

[@britishneko3906]

tomato

[@danieljasonkon9800]

@@britishneko3906 lol good one

[@MacTac141]

Honestly this could 100% be the most useful tank for Taiwan. With similar terrain and defensive doctrine I could definitely see this as more useful than Abrams Think it’s time to ship over a cool 50 of them

[@kukulroukul4698]

that is not possible ! its one thousand years old , well guarded secret in them

[@nagasako7]

Abram or ZTZ or T-80 or Challenger would have issues in the mountains of Japan to say the least. This tank is tailor made for country like Japan, Austria, Switzerland or Taiwan.

[@tomhenry897]

Need 500

[@yumyunrangLOAL]

For sure, Type 10 or K2 BP, largely the same despite how much people over rate the K2. Both are under-armoured compared to contemporary MBTs but both have great guns and great performance in mountainous areas

[@NoobNoobNews]

Either this or the Korean MBT.

[@Brodasco]

The battle ship with those biggest of all guns was the YAMATO. It means Spirit of the Nation. YAMAMOTO was the name of the Admiral, who before planning the Pearl Harbor attack, told the Japanese political leadership that Japan would definitely lose a war with the U.S. He lived in America for a few years, toured extensively, and knew well our industrial capability.

[@aurelian2668]

​@stareye3176 sad how no one listened to him.

[@calebkelly8221]

Good catch!

[@TheSegert]

I cringed at that... When he said Japanese battleship YAMAMOTO... Not Yamato. yamamoto was the admiral. And yamato is a region in japan. And indeed means spirit of the nation. Oh noo TP. I expected better of you. Im severely dissappointed now

[@MA-kr6yv]

Another reason it was better to develop a tank at home is weight restrictions. Most if not all modern mbts they would consider buying are too heavy so theyd have to buy lighter, older tanks which would reduce the performance potential of their tank forces.

[@saulshennan6825]

Modern MBTs are too heavy for much of the infrastructure in most countries, including the US. There are many American roads and bridges the Abrams cannot use.

[@HappyGM-R]

@@saulshennan6825 That as well but more importantly japan is heavily mountainous, and have basically no flat land unlike Europe. And even if there was to be flat land it would be preoccupied by cities and towns, meaning that tanks fighting in japan will be 100% going through mountainous terrain. All modern MBT apart from the type 10 would not be able to make it through such environment.

[@saulshennan6825]

@@HappyGM-R There's more level rural land in Japan than many people assume. It's approx. 75 percent mountainous, and the built up (urban) areas are massive, but there's still open country.

[@HappyGM-R]

@@saulshennan6825 You make it sound like 75% isn’t much, but that is the highest percentage among the developed nations. For comparison China is only 33%, Russia 25% ish, USA 20%, most of Europe below 10%. There are only handful of nations above japan in terms of how mountainous their land is, Switzerland and Nepal for example.

[@saulshennan6825]

@@HappyGM-R Where did I say it isn't much? I said it's 75%. But 25% of Japan isn't mountainous. Many other countries have much less flat ground. Japan is not unique in this respect. People always roll out the Teen Tank Expert tropes about Japanese infrastructure being unable to support heavy tanks while ignoring the fact the same is true in every country on Earth.

[@tomashidalgo5538]

7:54 “The battleship Yamamoto”…. It is true that the good old admiral had a character of steel, but he was not that heavy compared to today’s standards.

[@blacquejacqueshellaque6373]

Just to be clear to those who don't get it. Yamamoto was the Admiral, Yamato was the Battleship.

[@ReisskIaue]

@@blacquejacqueshellaque6373 At least Yamamoto was on IJN Yamato during the Battle of Midway.

[@Yuki_Ika7]

yeah, that gave me a cringe headache when he said that

[@alexiachimciuc3199]

😱🤣🤣

[@Frankie2012channel]

YAMATO! Not YAMAMOTO! WTH?

[@Legalizeasbestos]

A weapon to surpass Metal Gear

[@Butter_Warrior99]

A weapon to surpass, mamma mia.

[@NawoIl]

A weapon to surpass Papa John

[@alexdrockhound9497]

I present you with: Plastic Gear! 10x lighter! 10x weaker! 100% less metal!

[@f0rdgamer]

Metal Gear!?!

[@jerynturner4626]

Sounds pretty Solid

[@bagobones9891]

I've heard from multiple Japanese speakers that it's actually translated as microcrystal steel and it just means the particles themselves in the steel are way smaller making it stronger and giving a couple other benefits

[@miguelurrutdarkorangefan2750]

Tiny crystals allow for a higher hardness while keeping a desirable toughness (as tested with CVN tests).

[@briancavanagh7048]

Making the steel harder, does this make it more brittle?

[@davebauman4991]

They've repurposed their legendary sword smithing abilities to forging armor. Awesome!

[@AirLancer]

@@briancavanagh7048 That's the point of why it's supposed to be special, having increased hardness without becoming brittle.

[@stewartc4558]

@@briancavanagh7048 I dont believe so. Used similar in making a blade. Normally its how many blades does one belt make. With the "powered iron" its how many belts does it take to make one blade. If I remember the lecture its powdered by the molten "standard" steel mix being sprayed through a tiny nozzle into a chamber. As the molten steel is ejected the chamber temperature rapidly cools the grains form. Smaller the injection port and faster the cooling the smaller the grains. (or as I recall). Then you take this dust and forge that into a billet. As the temperature for forging is not melting the steel has a lot of tiny crystals that interlock rather that larger metal crystals in molten steel. Weakness of steel is between the crystal faces. But this is all from faulty memory.

[@Goji1]

The weight factor was also because they wanted the Type 10 to be able to be transported quickly using the extensive railway systems in Japan

[@Daifuku_Ram]

Umm... Actually Type10 cant be transported by railway

[@Daifuku_Ram]

@@davidgoodnow269 Japanese rail gage is narrower than other countries one And the tank is too wide to through tunnels Type 90 and Type10 need transporter to transport on express way

[@r_ex_7]

@@davidgoodnow269 😘my pookie bear

[@rickhayhoe]

It's the tunnels.@@davidgoodnow269

[@dyingearth]

The Chieftain always said that Merkava is the perfect tank for IDF because it meets their doctrine. Japan probably don't need M1 Abraham, but Type 10 is designed to meet their own need.

[@djocharablaikan8601]

M1 ABRAHAM ❤

[@天神シロかわ]

not abrams?

[@Theodoric99]

@@天神シロかわ as the founding fathers intended

[@天神シロかわ]

@@Theodoric99 Lincoln!

[@fromfareastindy8234]

Unlike Israel, Japanese tanks focus on direct tank warfare. Most of the country is mountainous and covered with trees, and annual precipitation, including snowfall, is enormous. Because of this, Japanese rivers flow extremely fast, and there are many bridges to cross them, so the invasion routes are very limited. For these reasons, land defense in mainland Japan is based on ambush tactics using concealed tanks. This is fatal to the Merkava, whose heat-source engines are located in the front. Even if the vehicle body, which is the heat source, is concealed, the angle of fire is limited by the angle of elevation and tilt, so a mechanism to control the posture of the vehicle itself is inevitably required. The Merkava is undoubtedly an excellent tank. However, it is not suitable for the Japanese operational concept of tanks.

[@ewok40k]

Having your tanks designed tailor made for your country geography is big plus, type 10 is a mild example, Sweden went whole nine yards with their strv-103 custom made for defensive war with Soviets

[@Eluderatnight]

Well its cold AF so the prob have special accomodations

[@unwnme]

@@Eluderatnight It's not that cold. :P

[@unwnme]

We should have modified it and sold it to Japan.

[@demun6065]

Also based on logistics eg. America is the only country that could field the Abrams in offense, due to the logistics tail.

[@pomelo9840]

​@@unwnme why would Japan want that? The door wedge was overall an interesting design, but hull aiming just doesn't seem to be the future.

[@SkepticalChris]

The Japanese battleship was the Yamato, not Yamamoto

[@kukulroukul4698]

true ! :))))

[@Red_bull50]

🤣 I'm guilty too

[@coldsoulanimation7412]

They're easy to confuse, Yamato is the ship, Yamamoto was the man.

[@pablom-f8762]

Space Battleship Yamamoto!!

[@jesustsa1]

Yamamoto sounds better. Winner decides the name.

[@monsieurduquack5440]

It was built to upheld the JSDF's long honored tradition of fighting off monsters that try to destroy it every week

[@lukejohnston4666]

Gojira

[@NeoZ45]

And to be destroyed in less than 15 seconds of screentime

[@rainforcer1]

Fodder for atomic breath

[@Joshua_N-A]

Does is include coup d'etat (Patlabor)?

[@terran33]

@@Joshua_N-A man of culture

[@barbaranostrand4214]

Japan is also about 90% mountainous which significantly influences defense as well. There was a third giant Japanese battleship laid down, but it was finished as an aircraft carrier. It was sunk while manned by a skeleton crew during sea trials by USS Archerfish.

[@carlpagunsan8287]

IJN Shinano... Too sad it was sunk too early without even doing anything unlike her sisters

[@天神シロかわ]

Yamato-class third ship carrier Shinano...

[@NIKOLAP7]

Territory that has a lot of natural barriers is difficult to conquer.

[@braincell4536]

@@NIKOLAP7 Afghanistan the graveyard of empire

[@NIKOLAP7]

@@braincell4536 It still is.

[@yume2666]

Military circles in Japan refer to type 10 as a 'fighter jet-like MBT'. This aptly describes type 10's operational doctrine - 'First Look, First Kill' supported by the C4 network, short combat radius and required frequent maintenance at base. The small, light body of type 10 suggests compromises in crew habitability and fuel capacity, not armour/protection.

[@nates9105]

Which is funny that is the doctrine adopted. They suffered in WWII over lack of fuel supplies so I would have thought they go for doctrines that enable limited resource situation. All it takes it restriction to sea or air supply and they would dwindle.

[@augustuslunasol10thapostle]

@@nates9105 that would be near impossible having the worlds most oil hungry nation guarding you like you are some wall flower given by the gods

[@RockSolitude]

@@nates9105 this time they have the world's most oil hungry nation backing them, instead of fighting them. Also WW2 is a completely different case. The Type 10 isn't expected to make long treks all over asia and the islands on a non-stop campaign.

[@pauloazuela8488]

@@nates9105 Different times , different situations. They're allied with the their former enemy who stop them from gaining resources aka the US. They occupied many good location with resources but got halted when US entered the pacific theater.

[@sirdiealot53]

@7:55 Yamato, not Yamamoto. He was a commander, Yamato is the battleship. ❤

[@CircaSriYak]

Cappy, in the course of making that cute little thumbnail of yours, did you stop and think to yourself "How did it come to this?"

[@Taskandpurpose]

lol yes, I thought "where did I go horribly wrong in life" then I wondered if it was offensive, or cultural appropriation then I stopped thinking and was hungry

[@radjadawamindra697]

​​​​@@Taskandpurpose trust me, you've done nothing wrong. In fact, you just reached out for a new demographic to subscribe to your channel.

[@TurtleChad1]

Fun fact: The only combat experience of this tank is when Godzilla attacked Japan.

[@WackadoodleMalarkey]

_Notice me Senpai Abramssamma!_

[@fs5miFi1dM4u5]

The self defense force tradition of fighting kaijus! Man you just reminded me of gate such a good anime I've been reading the manga as well as Japan summons great series.

[@للغةالعربية-ث3ه]

日本の沖縄にはエヴァンゲリオンが格納されてるってのを日本政府は隠してる

[@DSlyde]

God damn, this channel has gotten so much better than what it was only a year ago, let alone where it started. Absolutely deserves this comment for the algorithm.

[@death777th2]

8:42 😂😂😂 Presenter: "Bad editor! Down boy, that was not part of the presentation. Also, can you send me the sauce after this?" Editor: Umm...okay. Sure thing boss.

[@amandajoyce7608]

USA displays the new Abrams doing doughnuts. Germany displays their new tank with beer. But you said Russia displays their new tank (you showed a clip of one on fire. I thought that was funny but not quite correct.) Russia displayed their new tank, On Parade, frozen in place. There’s roubles well spent, an ornament for the parade ground. 😂

[@elmohead]

It's not frozen, it's just set to sentry mode.

[@luciusvorenus9445]

The Russian Armor Corps have created more Cosmonauts than all the Soyuz spacecraft in history.

[@Thor_Odinson]

And for every Russian tank built a senior defense official gets a dacha

[@veerchand8968]

No comrade, glorious Rossiya displays tank prowess by being only tank (turret) to enter orbit regularly, while decadent capitalists pigs have failed to send even one tank to orbit yet! Behold our awesome power, shake in fear (laughter)!

[@CAP198462]

Russian tanks are greatest tanks in world. If they break down, can be easily towed away by many common vehicles. Russian tanks also very light thanks to high tech corrugated cellulose fiber armour panels.

[@crusader_with_a_glock7941]

Hey man I love your videos, and how you give people a different view that we would normally consider. Keep doing what you're doing.

[@alexdrockhound9497]

Theres a steel manufacturing method called CPM (Crucible Powder Metallurgy) thats used to make steels harder and more durable even though they use the same chemistry as already existing steels, it does this by making the grain size smaller. I suspect this is not much different of a concept.

[@AlbertoMartinez765]

Japan actually has very poor quality steel that why they had to refine and fold their steel swords so many times. I always laugh when I hear someone mention "High Quality Japanese steel as if its a Great quality" They do Have Excellent Manufacturing process though as they have to to use their poor quality steel.

[@alexdrockhound9497]

@@AlbertoMartinez765 any country can make CPM steel, even from poor ingredients, it just costs more to do. There would be additional refining steps. Japan having bad ingredients hundreds of years ago is irrelevant to the modern day. And in modern days we can just use recycled scrap metal as the initial ingredient.

[@sheldoniusRex]

From what I've read this is similar to CPM. The idea being better homogeneity throughout the billet, along with greater control of martensite crystal precipitation during heat treat.

[@SirJaymesDAudelée]

U can make crucible steel in your back yard with iron, bone ash, clay, and hand made bellows. Rare hi quality swords were made this way as far back as the 8 or 900’s a.d. “Ulfberht” was a popular maker - who’s mark was often counterfeited because people could t figure out how he was making “iron” swords what were not break brittle, and therefore would not break when struck too hard, but flex, making a whipping sound when swung, the metal obviously being what we know as steel. Steel is just iron + carbon. A crucible was the easiest way to heat the materials to proper temp. Maybe the only way back then, I don’t know. But I’m sure whatever Japan is doing to create steel in 2023 that has qualities no one else can match, is far from making steel in a crucible.

[@jonathanpfeffer3716]

I believe it’s actually the exact same concept.

[@dragongrazer7620]

It reminds me of our swedish design doctrine, since we are highly focused on defending ourselves rather than attacking, and design around taking full advantage of the home turf terrain.

[@jonny2954]

Except the Strv 122 is one of the heaviest Leopard 2 variants in service...

[@Shinkajo]

@@jonny2954 what has that got to do with anything?

[@omarfuaad9644]

Ser man på en till Svensk som följer denna kanal xD

[@jonny2954]

@@Shinkajo Sweden isn't tank-friendly terrain. Over 100,000 lakes, in comparison, lower 48 states of the US have 125,000. At 15 times the size.

[@AdmiralLj]

​@@jonny2954 because FMV took one look at the Leppard 2a5 Armour and said "that is not good enugh" and made it better. Tanks in swedish doctrine is not for them to make rapid offensive maneuvers but to make use of prepared defensive protected positions while mechanized infantry outmanuvers the attacking force. Sweden is a dream for prepared ambushes an advancing force trying to push threw swedich terrain would have to be ready for an attack from any forest line.

[@janchovanec8624]

Hi Chris, good content. A few corrections: Mount Fuji is near Tokyo on a main island and not in the Northern Hokaido. The massive ship was called Yamato, Yamamoto was an admiral who didn't get the US cracked their ciphers.

[@天神シロかわ]

富士山が北海道の北側!? 彼は動画内で間違えましたか?

[@juanishikame7284]

Around 2:50 mark

[@desu-Love-God-peace-fo9bj4pu3e]

艦名はヤマトとムサシの2艦のタイプぬ(´-ω-)ｳﾑ暗号はポーランドと日本の合作のタイプぬポーランドが協力してくれた暗号ぬ(´-ω-)ｳﾑ1部は日本独自の暗号でこのタイプは解読されたぬ(´-ω-)ｳﾑ

[@jean-lucpicard5510]

You know if he can't get those basic facts correct , how can we trust the other stuff?

[@kabuki_kitten7129]

The type 10 is my personal favourite modern tank and i really hope my A levels and degree goes well as it would be the dream to work for mitsubishi heavy industries on insane vehicles like this

[@calebkelly8221]

Same here!

[@hipparchus3244]

640 MegaPascal is about 93,000psi. For reference, brass flows at 64,000psi, .308 maximum pressure is 62,000psi, 9mm is 35,000psi.

[@billyslide7645]

The requirements for this tank appear to be very well curated for the Japanese home islands. I think we’ll done. BTW, the battleship was the Yamato. Yamamoto was the admiral

[@davidanderson_surrey_bc]

Yamato, tomato. Let's call the whole thing off.

[@whitewolf2767]

@@davidanderson_surrey_bc noo. why should we? It was the world's largest battleship

[@certaintngs2000]

@@davidanderson_surrey_bc For that bad 'YOKE'...no Fugu for you!!!! LOL

[@fizz576]

Whenever I hear about the Japanese military, it is usually something relating to their navy its intresting to hear about their ground forces.

[@whysosyria1]

Well technically being an island country, I think their first line of defense is the navy

[@thetanksofworldwarii-tanka4368]

What i find impressive is that the Japanese design and build their own tank engine, despite making such a small number of tanks with little export potential. Many other countries have tried to develop their own modern tank engine and failed, eventually opting to import one from somewhere else.

[@wedgeantilles8575]

Well, if you have the third biggest economy in the world you can afford things like that. Why should a country with so many financial resources and a Tier 1 industry NOT be capable of developing and building an own tank?

[@rhysfirth3506]

It's Mitsubishi, they already made a number of large 20+ litre engines for their Fuso range. It's not a huge engineering challenge to leverage that to create a tank engine if you toss out the requirement of low fuel consumption in favor of massive power.

[@phunk8607]

Answer: japan… not some third world country. If i trust my Japanese car i trust their weaponised tech

[@thetanksofworldwarii-tanka4368]

@@wedgeantilles8575 It's less a question of capability, but rather one of being worth the effort from a financial standpoint. Tank engines have little civilian application, so it is a major investment for what is ultimately an engine with limited sales potential given Japans restrictions on export weapons sales.

[@TheAmbex]

Mitsubishi builds alot of vehicles. Everything from lawnmowers, to cars, to fighter jets, to massive cargo ships.

[@janneyovertheocean9558]

Taiwan could certainly use these made-for-Japan defensive battle tanks, given their similar geographic and geopolitical locations. I wish eventually enough of the Type 10 will be made and for export to friendly nation like Taiwan.

[@신의열단]

성능에 비해 너무 비싸. 일본방산의 문제점.

[@stephenwells6434]

The K2 does NOT have better performance than the Type 10. It has the same forward speed, a significantly slower reverse speed, the same power/weight ratio, a less versatile transmission, only slightly more horsepower (which is offset by its greater mass), and a smaller operational range. Also, the K2's main cannon is similar to the 120mm Rheinmetall cannon that the JDF rejected. That said, Taiwan might still want to go for the K2 rather than the Type 10, since Japan's strict arms export laws would make acquiring the Type 10 very difficult.

[@stephenwells6434]

@@Jurk844 1) There is a lot more to a tank's performance than how big its gun is. 2) The Type 10 fires specially designed ammunition that is more capable than the equivalent NATO-standard ammunition, which makes up for the lower caliber.

[@scantrontheimmortal]

​@@stephenwells6434Citation needed since the Japanese 120mm l/44 has similar performance to the rheinmetal 120mm l/55 guns. There really is only a 30 meter per sec difference between apfsds velocities on the main guns. Plus the Type 10 Apfsds has 36 milimeters less pentration performance than nato DM 53 at 500 metres. So i have no idea how one could say the only Domestically designed round on the Type 10 the Apfsds is somehow by default better than anything NATO has.

[@stephenwells6434]

@@scantrontheimmortal 1) The L/44 is not used on the Type 10, making that comparison moot. 2) Japan has not published the stats on the Type 10's armour penetration, so the reliability of your source is highly suspect. 3) What the JDF has said is that the Type 10 round has similar penetration to the DM53. They also claim that the round is better at penetrating reactive armour (though that isn't much of an issue for any NATO 120mm round, to be honest). 4) The Type 10 can fire any NATO standard 120mm rounds. How those rounds perform when fired by the Type 10 is unclear.

[@CMDRFandragon]

My favorite thing about the Type 10 is its name is basically the Type 10 10, since apparently Hitomaru is basically just 10.

[@FiredAndIced]

That is, Hito, being one (person), and Maru, is how the Japanese sometimes call the number zero as “The Big O, a circle.”

[@dreadnought3749]

If you were to force yourself to call "Hitomarushiki" in English, it would be something like "Type one O". So if there were "Type 20 tanks", they would have been called "Double O" and would have become giant robots.

[@izumishion6267]

The Type 10 is meant to replace the Type 74, SUPPLEMENT the Type 90. The Nanocrystal steel isn't as outlandish as the name might sound. Basically, the nanocrystal steel grain structure is far more smaller and arranged much better than traditional steels. This allows the bonds between the grains of the steel to have a stronger hold thus making the steel stronger while retaining the same weight.

[@coltyt9529]

Its frontal armor would like to argue with u It's thin asf compared to the rear armor 💀 plus I would rather have a tank that can take multiple hits on the front than a tank being a glass cannon

[@RockSolitude]

@@coltyt9529 and how would you know?

[@noway4689]

​@@coltyt9529A KZbin video from Japan's Defense Equipment Agency shows an anti-RPG defense test of the Type 10 tank.　Being lightweight does not mean inferior defense.

[@mehmetbozkurt3274]

​@@noway4689Being able to withstand an obsolete infantry anti-tank weapon frontally is not a good metric for a main battle tank.

[@turkeybird7679]

Japan should look at exporting this bad boy to Tiawan. Your analysis was thorough. I appreciated it.

[@Gloverfield]

Don't wanna be a grammar nazi but seeing "tiawan" hurts me 😵‍💫

[@philo-]

>Calling out the grammar of a nongrammatical typo while forgetting that the shift key exists Yikes @Gloverfield

[@tulsibeepat3453]

This reminds me of when Japan started in the car market, they were scoffed and openly . They learned from their mistakes and at the top of the industry. That adaptability is showing again and they don't cut corners to produce very high quality products. I like this and that tank goes into sci-fi territory ☺️

[@utkarshg.bharti9714]

Japan's problem is not its technology; it's the lack of actually having used it.

[@user-ph6ed8jm8t]

​@@utkarshg.bharti9714 you are right, selling to Taiwan is good opportunity to fix that problem. but it is also impossible because several problem surrounding article 9. So this tank will be used only in Japan for few decade. In that case, the fact of `the lack of actually having used it` turns to the strongness of their navy power

[@soru2186]

theres no fricking way this guy called the Yamato "Yamamoto" in 7:52 LMAO, anyways very nice video

[@pahtar7189]

The Type 10 is expensive in large part because they don't get the economy of scale when making just over 100 units.

[@pahtar7189]

@@julianpetkov8320: Japan was never a British colony.

[@abcdedfg8340]

​@@pahtar7189 No need to encourage the potential paid spammer. It may get paid by replies. Flag and move on. This channel is nice being non-political.

[@abcdedfg8340]

​@@julianpetkov8320 If you are part of the paid authoritarian bot army, please stop spamming this channel. Go find a political channel to spam. Not this non-political one.

[@mitch8072]

good point high research costs to

[@ІванКоваль-й5ж]

​@@abcdedfg8340 you are right. The problem is: because of different trisks they have TONS of accounts. So, ольгинские троли can make some nonsense of their propaganda quite popular (to impact opinions of those people who are vulnerable to the influence of environment). so, people like him (or me) are trying to respond at propagandist's nonsense (so, people around will be able to know not only propaganda but the truth too.

[@neurofiedyamato8763]

Tbh a lot of people I seen tend to under estimate the Type 10. Its all around am excellent tank. Some sacrifices were made but were done so in the context of what Japan needs.

[@IdeI2StOnEd]

weeb tank stronk tank

[@jdoe3006]

They don't have to worry about logistics and the fact that this tank can traverse very rough terrains is what's most impressive because most of Japan has a rough terrain.

[@MatteonixITA]

From what i know about the Type 10, for it's weight and for it's size, it is a pretty good MBT, people really don't look into it that much due to the Abrams and Leopard 2 being the most famous MBTs, but that is just my opinion, i like Japanese military vehicles so it could just be bias.

[@Sphinx0514]

7:50 I hate to be that guy (not really ) but the battleship name is "Yamato" (there's an anime inspired by it). Yamamoto was the IJN head at the start of WWII. It's a common mistake.

[@michaelr4858]

Side armor is always important. If you get the enemy on the run you will need to go on the offensive. A few grunts with ATGM’s could take out a bunch of your tanks from the sides.

[@HanSolo__]

I would never put a few grunts with ATGM's that has no top-attack capabilities. A side attack means you need to be close enough to easily get killed by their grunts. Mark 10 is not Russian T-72 that goes unsupported toward the frontlines let alone in the number of 3.

[@Farweasel]

*OF COURSE it needs side armour & top armour* After watching what's happened in Ukraine they will grasp this. It may well be they already did but are keeping schtum 🤐 Beyond that - just so. An effective tank is not just a defensive asset - You can have much cheaper artillery options for that. The value of a tank is its verasatility *including* its offensive capability [But then, Mr Cappy esquire did point out Tank warfare is a new area for the JDF)

[@useodyseeorbitchute9450]

@@Farweasel Yeah, I was also perplexed by his reasoning. The main function of a tank is for offensive / active defense. For simple static defense, one could order something cheaper.

[@paidwitness797]

@@useodyseeorbitchute9450 Im guessing Japan sees their defence, especially against China as an 'all or nothing' deal, so tanks are a mobile force to oppose landings, having the advantage of not needing proper static positions that can be mapped by enemy in advance, but enough punch and armour to go head to head against anything landing, if that fails Japan knows it has nowhere to fallback to, so a very limited role in a movement sense other than getting to location needed fast. Also sounds like they are waiting for their active defence to reach readiness rather than adding more armour to sides/top, which may be a smarter long term move depending on how far they are from finishing it.

[@HanSolo__]

@@Farweasel I dont think any tank is able to take on an additional armor on top of the turret. It's a large surface to cover. Type 10 seem to have an up-armoring option. Aplique set of sorts. It's nice to look at fast agile tank when it flexes on training grouds. But the reality is called "battle ready" - an ad-on armor is placed. Means tank gets 2 to 6 tonnes heavier. Very expensive but for now single solution is the "hard-kill" Active Protection System like Trophy or Iron Fist. Other option rarely mentioned yet effective (if it was serviced and works) is the APS of "soft-kill" type. On the PT-91 tank it formed a set of systems. Starting from automatic pop of the smoke screen when the laser radiation detection system is triggered, e.g. with a rangefinder. Obviously its not a regular smoke. Another effective system is the gunshot direction and distance detection. In this case, the grenade fired from the bank is not a smoke, but a combat grenade against manpower. Notice how many launchers this tank has on the turret. Now you know why he has so much. Not many ppl know that meticulousness and economy in the disposal of the tank's weight resembles that of the aviation industry. It's not like a certain type of tank can take on some extra unforeseen 2 tons of weight without affecting the capability or durability of the structure. The PT-91 is wider, packed with stuff and more heavily armored, and the more powerful Polish engine is barely enough to make up for the loss of mobility.

[@jesustsa1]

Was just in Japan in Dec 2022 and you’re right, they are polite!! Wish we Americans could learn about that and cleanliness.

[@atomicshadowman9143]

Racially homogeneous

[@swissmilitischristilxxii3691]

I love their homogeneity and their hate for multiculturalism. That's what I want for my daughters.

[@Shinkajo]

Well that politeness is a double edged sword, but can't argue with the cleanliness

[@kermitcook8498]

Great job, Cappy! Right up to that Yamamoto thing. There was supposed to be a third Yamato class beast out there until they decided Carriers were what was more important. The largest of WWII, the IJN Shinano, lasted about 10 days before resting in Davy Jones locker. Type 10 outweighs my Mitsubishi by at least 42 tons. No, wait a minute, my Mitsubishi was a Dodge. Nevermind. You know, if they built those in the States, they could probably save about $3 million per. I mean, everything costs more in Japan, right? My biggest hope is that we don't have to find out how good they are. Aim high.

[@hazelhang4615]

Type 10 fits the Philippines since we have the same terrain type like Japan. The Jungles, Sea, more islands, also the mountains. However the budget doesn't fits.

[@pauloazuela8488]

We need light tanks with decent tech not the very latest we can't afford it 😂

[@k-studio8112]

Leopard would be the best though since it's cheaper.

[@barleysixseventwo6665]

"Japanese Ironworks is famous for using a process that yields incredibly pure steel" Something, Something, "Folded a thousand times".

[@jd_99]

said in a voice that sounds like you have extreme constipation

[@Soravia]

Japanese light tanks of WWII were brilliant idea for all the island hopping they had to do, and the resources they had to deal with. Especially with Navy hogging all the budget.

[@boejiden7093]

The type 10 is an excellent tank. Hopefully Japan procures more of them in the near future. Only issue is they dont have a growing youth population that can drive these tanks. They need more young people in their armed forces

[@大和ヴ]

その通り

[@daddukes2110]

They need more people. Japan's population is dying off

[@satriorama4118]

​@@daddukes2110 Korea even more dire than Japan. They're already in minus numbers.

[@hudsonreynolds4349]

I am continually impressed with Japan and this tank is very impressive as well. They seem to have considered many options and made some good decisions that might prove very effective in the future. I would love to see some clips of these vehicles shooting with sound when you post videos about military vehicles. That cannon looks seriously badass when firing

[@stewarthill5878]

Very cool to see what Japan is doing. It’s nice that we are all on the same side. They are a great country. 🇺🇸🚒

[@SASGamer_Pro]

are u sure?

[@stargeno]

@@SASGamer_Pro yes

[@Trinity3-75]

you american? Japanese did a medical experiment on a living body to captive american soldiers during the world war 2. They attacked Pearl Harbor when it was sunday morning. so funny that so many americans do not know about a medical experiment on a living body - US soldiers.

[@mihail-_]

Japan cannot but be on the side of the States, without the States it would not exist as it is today

[@pedropedrohan102]

why the 🚒?

[@MacTac141]

The Russia joke at 6:12 got me good, Bro you killed em with that roast!💀

[@Gaehhn]

I think they were already roasted...

[@fulconandroadcone9488]

@@Gaehhn Self roasted

[@merrily08]

Roast p'orc!

[@k-studio8112]

They've conducted fire test😂😂😂

[@SkepticalChris]

I'm waiting for a Japanese tank that also turns into a walking giant robot

[@ArashRajaeeyan]

If I was Japan I would invest in some sort of near shore marine tank like boat, they would probably be more useful to defend their islands.

[@ninjasiren]

@0:37 Now we know Cappy is into anime, he was just hiding it 😅

[@GamePlayShare]

It was Yamato, not Yamamoto

[@jaytomioka3137]

The Battleship was named the YAMATO. She was the flagship of Admiral Yamamoto.

[@jeffbaade3521]

Chris excellent evaluation as usual on modern weapon systems and their employment in todays battlefield.

[@tasman006]

One of the majour reasons for the type 10 is the Type 90 was to big to moove around on the Japanese rail and built up infastructure of thier main island and is why its based in Hokadio island where it has room to moove.

[@mashrien]

"oh my, senpai"- I blew breakfast shake out my nose, thanks for that cappie.

[@pvt1498]

Love from Japan❤️. In recent years, the Japanese Army is planning to improve its deployment capabilities in Honshu and the Ryukyu Islands by promoting the deployment of a Type 16 Maneuver Combat Vehicle that is lighter than the Type 10 MBT, wheeled and can be air transported. This is similar to how the B1 Centauro operates in Italy.

[@GuardDog42]

America here. You seem educated on the subject, I'm curious what hardware you guys got to screen your waters from the shore. In additon I would be very interested to know what the intended strategy is to rid the islands off the coast of Hokkaido from Russian forces should a war break out.

[@zltg.mn0ng99]

Legends say that each Type-10 tank has a soul of it's own and that it would only work with crews who are worthy.

[@Sneakyboson]

A ghost in the shell, would you say?

[@stalincat2457]

Also many of the operator's mothers coincidentally went missing under mysterious circumstances.

[@theicepickthatkilledtrotsk658]

Japan started the biggest military build-up since WW2. Giga Chad Yukio Mishima literally died for this.

[@dashikashi4734]

Based

[@steffenjespersen247]

From what I can see even the Abrans M1A2 SEPV3 is "only" using the M256 (Rh-120 L/44) M256E1 is the Rh-120 L/55 but not in use on any version of M1A2 it seems. Only production tanks is Leopard 2A6 and later uses Rh-120 L/55 Newest version of this gun Rh-120 L/55 A1 (entered service 2018) And has a design pressure 760 MPa

[@blagerthorpnonersense1894]

IMO the biggest reason Japan wants to build their own MBT is because in a hypothetical war with China they do not want supply of tank guns and parts to be blockade-able. Producing tanks in country also lets them position themselves to more easily turn to a total war footing if they need to.

[@sirsmeal3192]

I think it is the future of tanks, especially the higher compression gun, the medium weight, and the future cannister defense. I am concerned that the adjustable suspension may be great in mountainous terrain, but extra weight in swampy areas.

[@flaksight]

Nice episode, it's always a blast to see notifications from T&P. It's also wonderful that you guys put a clip from MEMORIES (1995) in there, the Stink Bomb segment. I loved the third part "Cannon Fodder" and it's still my single most favorite animated work. There even came a videogame based on its setting called Redcon.

[@TheStrayHALOMAN]

Crystal steel is like the armor from Halo in that the atoms in the metal are structured... My guess is Japan forged these under pressure to crystallize the steel since they don't have a zero gravity forge like in Halo.

[@Chiller01]

Nice summary of a vehicle I know very little about. I was surprised at the steepness of the terrain around Yamaguchi when I visited that city in Japan. I can see the utility of the leaning tank. Oh that comment yielding mispronunciation of that boat called the Yamamoto. Stay classy infantryman Cappy!

[@stupidburp]

Type 10 needs a hard kill active protection system. Should be able to add Trophy or something similar in place of part of the modular armor options. Final weight would be perhaps around 45-50 tons. Still quite light for a main battle tank.

[@かなりブンブン]

防衛装備庁で研究されていましたが、未だに採用はされていない。

[@calvinsides]

"A weird flex , but alright" fuckin killed me. Damn that was a smooth burn

[@Jazkal-V420]

0:44 to be fair, both anime and the T10 MBT are Made in Japan.

[@viper5535]

A very amazing tank, I am glad that US-Japan relations are at an all time high, and we can put our differences aside to fight against authoritarianism.

[@marcariesteomarcos3752]

You forgot to mention that Japanese tanks also has been built to be utilized and for combat facing extra terrestrial beasts and alien monsters

[@arx3516]

They're meant to distract the monsters before the super robots arrive.

[@jawarakf]

​@@arx3516you mean ultraman?

[@richardwarner3705]

The U.S. M 47 is my favorite tank. It was the last U.S. tank with a bow machine gun. My second favorite is the Japanies Type 61.

[@blindoutlaw]

You forgot to mention the switch that allows the tank to transform into a gundam battlemech capable of limited flight and heroic poses

[@Chironex_Fleckeri]

Japan saw their tank history in WWII and were determined to, *at least* , fight with a fancy tank this time around. They will not be embarrassed by the tiny tank legacy.

[@denysmkhize2379]

It really does look a lot like the French Leclerc, just as the Type 90 closely resembles the German Leopard 2A4.

[@blakebrown534]

Dang, that firing while coming to a stop @ ~ 6:45 was pretty crazy. You'd think that massive weight shifting + suspension rebound would dramatically throw off the shot.

[@HanSolo__]

Poles use the same method. They have no modern stabilizers in the PT-91ones that would allow to accurate 1500m shot while on the move. And even though I know that their level of training would allow them to shoot accurately on the move, they themselves maintain the highest professionalism and do not rely on tricks that give a "probable" hit. They go for a certain hit paid for by stopping the vehicle for 3 seconds.

[@p0xus]

6:11 I actually LOL'd here. That was a great burn Hah. Get it? Because fire.

[@lawrencefrost9063]

The fact that you had time to mention that anime... Wow! Stinky is underrated

[@TXMEDRGR]

I have never spent time with the Japanese army SDF but the Navy personnel are very professional.

[@pwdajjal]

Japan could well design a tank platform that easily change via capability mods such as the turret can be given option for cannon, aircraft carrier guns or artillery launchers which would suit them given their relatively small budget and wide landmass and different terrain to cover. They also should make their tanks amphibious capable enough to cross the seas to their other islands given them unlimited range of operation. but what we all really want is for Japan to come out with a MECH warrior type weapons!!! Just the looks of GUNDAM protecting Japan would scare the shit out of china ☝😆

[@半吃饭饭可控硅]

Seriously？

[@charlesmartin1121]

The Abrams also uses a 120mm barrel of 44 calibers.

[@mrvwbug4423]

The newer variants of the M1A2 use the 55 caliber version

[@charlesmartin1121]

@@mrvwbug4423 I have not heard about that. We did test a Rheinmetall L55 gun on the Abrams from 1999 to 2001, but did not take it into service.

[@jonomurphy1117]

@@mrvwbug4423 Pretty sure it doesnt

[@jwb1227]

@@mrvwbug4423 I am not sure but I highly doubt that our M1A2SEPV3 would use a L55 because of the DU rounds (M829A series up to 4) has limitations on speed. To have the penetration level (some test rounds have close to 1000mm penetration into armor) and the self-sharpening characteristics of Depleted Uranium rounds, the sabots cannot travel too fast (like from a L55 barrel) as it would shatter instead of penetrating and boring through ERA armor. The DU rounds needs to be fired from L44 for maximum effectiveness. It is not all about the length gentlemen... it is what you do with it~ LOL.

[@jonathanvallee4561]

7:52 it's the battleship YAMATO, Yamamoto Isuruko was the great admiral of the japanese navy during the ww2

[@AndreiKucharavy]

9:30: "Titan round performance is still a closely guarded secret" I take it as War Tunder is not available in Japan and everyone gets a stern briefing about talking on online forums..

[@Frazec_Atsjenkov]

Given similar terrain and other operational conditions, I would assume this tank is also ideal for use in Taiwan.

[@vendetta8022]

It uses a lot of latest technology which makes this tank expensive and not very reliable. However, since the short logistic line and Japanese only needs limited amount of it, those drawbacks seems acceptable. It is just another example to proof why there is no "best" tank, since a lot of countries have special requirements.

[@artalchemy7940]

信頼性が高くない？？？

[@Kira559]

@@artalchemy7940そう意味で言ったんじゃないと思いますよ。日本製の戦車はめっちゃ高いからあまり量産できないけど日本の地形などを考慮するとそもそも数はそんなに要らないから大きな問題ではないって言ってると思います

[@honndawakenomikoto]

⁠​⁠@@artalchemy7940様 上の方の言われる二アンスであってると思います。 not very reliable ＝　no need to heavily depend on 強く依存する必要がない　かなと思います。

[@KT-ub8lp]

@@artalchemy7940 上の方が言っている「信頼性が高い」というのは、AK47やランドクルーザーのような、壊そうとしても壊れないレベルの信頼性を指しているんだと思います。

[@briantodd2376]

I’d like to see some tests on this armor. That said the shorter length barrel and being more maneuverable probably works better for those small islands plus that’s some serious muzzle velocity for a 120 mm!

[@coltyt9529]

I'd say its frontal armor won't made it 💀

[@かなりブンブン]

実はtype90よりも正面装甲は重く、高い防御力を示しています。 側面？トップアタック？聞かないで下さい☠

[@coltyt9529]

@@かなりブンブン 💀

[@A_Cadian_Guardsman]

Japan is just the ultimate form of a support player.

[@dayshon124]

No cap Cappy, I enjoy your videos, it's easier on the ears than Perun, a bit more to the point than Macbeth, and you post more than Lazerpig, love them all but I'm always here when you post bro, keep up the fire.

[@Warmaker01]

In the interwar years the Imperial Japanese Army was keenly interested in developing tank warfare. However, that lost out as we got towards WWII era. The IJA wanted tanks but Japan is a resource starved country. The Navy was spending big, too, and was one of the world's premier naval services. When WWII started the navies of the USA, UK, and Japan were the strongest 3 in the world. The Imperial Japanese Navy had plenty of ships and were arguably the premier carrier force at the start of WWII. But the big ticket item the IJN went for, even despite resistance within its own ranks, was the Yamato-class Battleships which began construction in the late 1930s. They required a lot of steel and the country was on steel collection drives to get from even its own population. All those ships, plus the Yamato-class sucking up all the steel meant something had to go... And that "something" was the Army's tank program. One of the casualties. Another interesting thing about Japan's requirements for their tanks is that the country is very mountainous and hilly. I've been there and to Okinawa a bunch of times during my service with the USMC. Look up a topographical map of Japan and just how extensive hills and mountains are. There were very few places eligible for amphibious landings and the country is a defender's paradise. You also mentioned the Ryuku Islands. Okinawa is part of that chain of islands. Very hilly terrain.

[@DruidicRifleman]

Hey @Cappy... the abrams also has a L44 caliber gun the US never adopted the L55 like the Canadians Germans and other leopard did The American Gun is a Licence Version with a different recoil system

[@johnslugger]

*The Secret DART alloy is 92% Tungsten Carbide for hardness and hitting weight, 7.5% Cobalt which stops the Dart from shattering on impact plus .5% Molybdenum to make the Dart "slippery" so it can penetrate 44CM deep into rolled/layered armor. Knowing the alloys is not only trick. They also know how to forge it so all the grain layers run in the same direction kind of like Damascus layered steel or folded steel in a Japanese sward.*

[@manchagojohnsonmanchago6367]

All rolled steel has grains running in one directions.. Haha damn its why when producingproducts frim steel you must know the way thebsteel is rolled when you cut items that will flex from steel plate

[@Saki-yukkuri-ch]

My honest opinion as a Japanese is that Japan is the only country that buys Japanese weapons, and Japanese military-related companies are in decline, so I think exports are necessary to protect friendly countries. (Mainly Taiwan etc.)

[@NAKANO-ITSUKI.0505]

問題は憲法と野党だな。特に共産立憲れいわ辺り、、、、 中国もなんだかんだで妨害してきそうだし、、 前途多難ダナ。。。

[@KkKk-br4iw]

英国と共同開発して、英国が英国製兵器として英国連邦に輸出。

[@realtsarbomba]

Could it be because Japan has strict laws on exporting weapons?

[@Saki-yukkuri-ch]

@@realtsarbomba This is because of the Three Principles on Arms Exports, which are different from the law. However, recently the rules have become less strict, and I think exports will increase little by little.

[@Saki-yukkuri-ch]

@@realtsarbomba However, in Japan, many people think that even owning weapons to protect the country is a bad thing if it is for the sake of pacifism, and there is no sense of protecting the country. There are many people who don't think well of the Self-Defense Forces. So it's going to be a tough road.

[@HadzoonayMeegus]

0:36 ah yes, the Type 10 Artoria firing the HE Excalibur rounds, bless

[@GoneGolfing]

Japan Steel Works is headquartered in Hiroshima I believe. I visited a fully automated research factory in Hiroshima jointly operated by JSW and Mazda. They produce plastics door inside panels for the Mazda corporation - the entire factory was operated by 3 people. The real kicker is that it was in the early 1990’s when I visited - I would NOT be surprised at all that the barrel for their T-10 tank meet or exceed those of all of allied forces by a wide margin.