_but that one dude is the one only working_ _im gonna save him_
@dumb54107 жыл бұрын
a bunch of fucking letters yes best answer
@skypuppeteer7 жыл бұрын
It literally says in the video that the five workers cannot escape. The only real question is, if they tracks are close enough and the one worker can literally see the other five, why isn't he over there trying to untie them, letting you flip the switch?
@TheReligiousAtheists7 жыл бұрын
Yeah... I thought the same thing
@refathbari74687 жыл бұрын
Munawwar Abdul Muneer WRONGLY
@squiddlybeatz39287 жыл бұрын
woozie I would push I'm off and then jump off and run from the TR am
@priyadarshini9965 жыл бұрын
Why are these TED-Ed videos always so aesthetic?
@hyperonestarcraft5 жыл бұрын
I despise myself for reading "aesthetic" as "atheist"
@legume74695 жыл бұрын
AESTHETIC
@Kowalth5 жыл бұрын
They're into Vaporwave.
@SapienSafari5 жыл бұрын
They have a good marketing team.
@nilgaming20225 жыл бұрын
Priya darshini 1000th comment like
@straykidsuwu70025 жыл бұрын
a. Save 5 workers but kill one worker b. Save 1 worker but kill 5 workers c. Rigourously flip switch back and forth and dislodge train from tracks, running the risk of killing 20 but saving 6
@egorence21495 жыл бұрын
d. flip the switch quickly 2 times so trolley starts to do double track drift
@riboanpjg5 жыл бұрын
@@egorence2149 MULTI-TRACK DRIFTING!!
@theworldoverheavan5605 жыл бұрын
@@egorence2149 lol
@neodintchly5 жыл бұрын
@@egorence2149 Secret ending
@jasonli25945 жыл бұрын
Stray Kids UWU *Harvard wants to know your location*
@Drag0nStorm13 жыл бұрын
oh man whoever animated this did such a great job all those smooth transitions and abstract but meaningful imagery! wow.
@arkice19372 жыл бұрын
The sound design was fantastic as well.
@loganshark6672 жыл бұрын
@@arkice1937 agreed also I have a question for you 3 people are trapped on a rail With a speeding train if you pull the lever to change the direction of the train it will run over a button instead that has a 5% chance of seting off a nuclear bomb what do you do?
@quanten Жыл бұрын
The 3 people, to prevent chance of blowing the whole state down..
@daudaliyafie5463 жыл бұрын
the animators will never be paid enough for such good animations! 10/10
@lorishu481033 жыл бұрын
This comment is 11/10
@ominhquan72773 жыл бұрын
everyone gangsta until u trip and fall over with the man also
@kevintanudjaja88933 жыл бұрын
Anyone know the animator's instagram or name?
@daud9873 жыл бұрын
Yes
@zahrinalutfia86993 жыл бұрын
yup
@sakatagintoki55624 жыл бұрын
There’s also a version wherein the five people were criminals who have done horrible stuff, and the one worker is a law-abiding citizen.
@buzzlightyearpfp76414 жыл бұрын
thats so easy. just let it go. the criminals will die anyway in jail
@sakatagintoki55624 жыл бұрын
Alex Qwertyuiop, they won’t tell you that the five people are criminals or the one worker is a law-abiding citizen when making the choice. Only after making the choice.
@buzzlightyearpfp76414 жыл бұрын
@@sakatagintoki5562 thats not even a dilema then. its just misinformation
@digestmymind4 жыл бұрын
If I didn't have that information beforehand then it makes no difference.
@ayingchanda4 жыл бұрын
@@buzzlightyearpfp7641 misinfirmation? You didnt know any of them yet. Who will tell you?
@yusha39054 жыл бұрын
why is no one talking about the art & animation in this video like *W O W*
@yusha39054 жыл бұрын
@Mushaku I've looked for any info I could find about the animator & what they use, but I couldn't find anything, sorry.
@pursuitsoflife.61194 жыл бұрын
@Mushaku love and creativity. Also Blender and Adobe AE I guess
@madi30674 жыл бұрын
@@yusha3905 the animator is cited at the end along with her(?) email
@yusha39054 жыл бұрын
@@madi3067 I know that, I found their Instagram & website, but I was looking for the programs they use to animate with.
@annabelledsouza014 жыл бұрын
@Mushaku I don't know for sure, but it looks like the animation was most likely done using blender :) I hope that helps!
@nate88873 жыл бұрын
Another solution Keep flipping the switch really fast when the trolleys on the intersect. It will break the trolley.
@qweqwe-by6sf3 жыл бұрын
And then crash to an area containing hundreds of people
@rosewang80213 жыл бұрын
@@qweqwe-by6sf (・∀・)
@washmonument3 жыл бұрын
@@qweqwe-by6sf well, Ted-ed did say " _RUNAWAY_ " train... *IDOIT!*
@niuqaoj893 жыл бұрын
Multitrack drifting
@Unthinkablenames3 жыл бұрын
Is there anyone in the trolley tho
@kokonots7 жыл бұрын
I'm trying to save these people but this one train keeps killing them
@KaliTakumi7 жыл бұрын
Is it TheTrolley27?
@leonxl7 жыл бұрын
Usheer L
@TacoMastersAssociation7 жыл бұрын
Is it TheThomas27?
@TheStyler27107 жыл бұрын
TacoMasters Association it IS theThomas27!
@ShizL7 жыл бұрын
XD
@vitalic_drms5 жыл бұрын
schrodinger’s trolley splits in two and rides over all of them
@Drewer5 жыл бұрын
made me cry!
@cluelessarn5 жыл бұрын
But half killing them.
@hoaithunguyen44735 жыл бұрын
And then all of them are half dead and half alive when you haven't looked, and then maybe you could save 3 people in average, and 6 at best luck. Ps: I know it seems wrong but doesn't it sound convincing?
@cluelessarn5 жыл бұрын
@@hoaithunguyen4473 It's quantum mechanics after all.
@lootbox2895 жыл бұрын
according to schrodinger's trolley theory, if you close your eyes it could be 50/50. I can live with those odds. Cool guys never look back anyways.
@gnochhuos6457 жыл бұрын
Change the question to this: "Would you sacrifice your self to save five?" And see the result of people answering it
7 жыл бұрын
The answer was already 10% with the fat guy, that change wouldn't make much of a difference.
@TheVilivan7 жыл бұрын
Belial That change would make A LOT of a difference, killing oneself is harder than killing another person
@jhonbards22187 жыл бұрын
Well... I think if you just "asked" a person if they would do it, some would say yes. To sound holy or to impress. But in an actual situation? *No* human would ever sacrifice himself. Unless he was Jesus of course... Or just nuts.
@basumi00237 жыл бұрын
Vietnam Mapper yes i would because i judged about my life and not of a person i dont know.
@joelchungus7 жыл бұрын
Jhon Bards or have nothing to lose and no longer have the will to live
@cozyflurry3 жыл бұрын
I love that the animator sometimes animates simple 2d, sometimes animates smooth 3d, and sometimes realistic stuff like the heart and the hand. It’s cool.
@avivastudios23112 жыл бұрын
Yeah. But the heart was so terrifying to me.
@vokainodragon47377 жыл бұрын
If you're strong enough to push that heavy guy that could stop the train, just go super saiyan and stop the train yourself
@gobblerbaby18717 жыл бұрын
ikr
@BigGamer25257 жыл бұрын
Plus it isn't immediately obvious and hard to picture having a fat man being able to stop a train, while a switch that switches the tracks is easier to picture.
@hyperednova78897 жыл бұрын
Vokainodragon l Road to 100 FUCKIN YELL AYE GET THE HELL OUT THE WAY A TROLLEY IS COMIN BTW if don't work then yeah go super saiyn and go KAMEHHAAAAA FUCKIN BREAK THE TRAIN
@vokainodragon47377 жыл бұрын
wtf
@TheReligiousAtheists7 жыл бұрын
+Munawwar Abdul Muneer But then your body won't stop the train unless you also are HUGE.
@saukhyatelge48795 жыл бұрын
You know, the other man can see the trolley too....and he decides to push you instead....
@thalespro99955 жыл бұрын
Now I know how to kill everyone jump off and frame him
@cateIeya5 жыл бұрын
Saukhya Telge Think about the situation before you say
@riouniverse13905 жыл бұрын
Now if that man, decides to start pushing me, then it's gonna be an entirely different story
@gamehunter19455 жыл бұрын
If I go down your coming with me
@qwenm8245 жыл бұрын
since theres no correct option then i wont push:\ maybe call police
@Nemmy725 жыл бұрын
Everyone: Just get the worker to move! *HEY!* Oh no he has Airpods, he cant hear us!
@seokjinsjokethatnoonelaugh93144 жыл бұрын
Allzombifood underrated comment af
@bruhsauce6444 жыл бұрын
BUILD THE HELICOPTER!
@ferociousmaliciousghost4 жыл бұрын
I told my friend of this problem and he asked why can't they hear. This was the answer I gave him.
@jokertm68894 жыл бұрын
Ferociously Malicious Rain and I answered either save them all or let the five die and then kill the worker with ax
@jolene97564 жыл бұрын
LOL
@zyxa8977 Жыл бұрын
I once met a person who told me they would kill the 5 people because it would be easier to explain in court.
@Drkekw Жыл бұрын
damn
@jamie5731 Жыл бұрын
and right that persn is
@avachen9270 Жыл бұрын
But then won't it be called as mass murder. Idk how the court works but as far as i know a human or one person is capable of mass murder. So it can be proved as that .
@Vineon200 Жыл бұрын
I would because I wouldn’t have murder on my hands, I didn’t change the path
@TheGregamonster Жыл бұрын
That makes sense. There aren't many cases where failing to save lives is a crime, but intentionally ending lives is always one.
@neutronstar67397 жыл бұрын
The animation is so satisfying..
@puffbluesam0217 жыл бұрын
Neutron Star minimalistic.
@KingAce777697 жыл бұрын
Blender is way better than autodesk maya
@madmax17177 жыл бұрын
yeah it looks like Blender, I wonder if they use more tools and how long it takes.
@DarkCartoon_music7 жыл бұрын
Neutron Star the animation is pretty fluid though.
@DibyanshuPatnaik7 жыл бұрын
Wait so all these animations are done using Blender!?
@archishadasgupta41785 жыл бұрын
"Hey! There's a trolley coming! Move out of the way! Thanks!"
@arnavanand80375 жыл бұрын
Genius
@goldenexperiencerequiem47145 жыл бұрын
HE’S WEARING AIR PODS
@stumpagt78085 жыл бұрын
E
@riparoo96755 жыл бұрын
Clever answer, and realistically what you would do (and you're joking so it's cool). But, easy answers like that avoid the point of the question. Think hard and question why you would pick one or the other. And if you can't decide, well, think as to why and how that impacts who you are.
@troythemighty36835 жыл бұрын
Archisha Dasgupta They can’t hear you because your are in the operation station controlling the trolleys being on the right tracks.
@NoTraceOfSense4 жыл бұрын
We all know the correct answer to this problem: *_Multi-Track Drifting._*
@MONTR654 жыл бұрын
Nani!!!??!
@buntafujiwara76984 жыл бұрын
YES
@afdhals.58474 жыл бұрын
GAS GAS GAS
@grifm.52244 жыл бұрын
I would get on the track to add to it
@humanyter72144 жыл бұрын
Hey your pfp is from High School DxD right? Akeno
@Minclnhat3 жыл бұрын
The workers be like: *hmm yes what that loud noise probably just the wind*
@popcorncolonel7265 жыл бұрын
Switch the tracks when you’re half way over the switch so you can get that 6 player kill streak
@ZachAttack60895 жыл бұрын
Multi-track drifting!
@abhirama.t.74205 жыл бұрын
Michael?
@popcorncolonel7265 жыл бұрын
No, Michael attached a long sword to the side
@stefanetienney26665 жыл бұрын
Chidi slowly backing away
@DrizzyEmin3m5 жыл бұрын
A man of culture i see
@peterraffoul40723 жыл бұрын
I actually hate this. I can never know If the one guy has a huge family and the 5 people are all serial killers.
@Zero-ok9ze3 жыл бұрын
Haha good thought
@roshanantony643 жыл бұрын
Hol Up
@higorss3 жыл бұрын
@Jov Ven but if you choose to do nothing you'll save the one
@grantcivyt3 жыл бұрын
@@higorss It's a false choice. You don't have a right to decide who lives and dies. The fact that you have the ability to decide isn't relevant.
@higorss3 жыл бұрын
@@grantcivyt What if there is 5 parents of yours in one track and 1 strange in the other one?
@zuzuzuzuzuz88954 жыл бұрын
Came after that 2 year old kid who killed all six
@patriciogonzalez50374 жыл бұрын
Haha, me too
@charismaa87814 жыл бұрын
Same bro
@soroushhaidary79344 жыл бұрын
God bless youtube
@michtes4 жыл бұрын
Lol me too
@rishikkeshsuresh36924 жыл бұрын
lol metoo
@Niinsa623 жыл бұрын
I vaguely remember a similar dilemma, where the answers people gave in a survey differed, depending on exactly how the dilemma was described. It had something to do with one person being gravely ill, and who would surely die if you didn't put five other people at some level of risk of death. Depending on how the question was phrased, the majority of people asked would either put the five other people at risk of death, or not. Sorry that I can't remember the details now. But the point was that this person who is ill will surely die if you do nothing. But if you do something, you might end up killing all six. But you might also end up saving all six. Well, five of them weren't in any risk before, so "saving them" might be a bad choice of words. It bugs me now that I can't remember the two ways the question was asked. Interesting, however, that the exact same ethical dilemma might get two totally different answers from the same person, depending on your choice of words when presenting the problem.
@iceyyl3mon Жыл бұрын
Hmmm interesting
@yocampout7 жыл бұрын
you know, I think ,in a real situation, a lot of people would just stand there and do nothing but watch. why wasn't that an option?
@samal31967 жыл бұрын
That falls under 'don't flip the lever'
@yocampout7 жыл бұрын
Hanna Takeuchi yep.I guess ur right.
@Anomen777 жыл бұрын
But it's not the same to decide to not press the lever, or to not press it because you're in shock and can't make a decision in time.
@yocampout7 жыл бұрын
Anomen that's an angle I never considered. I was thinking of being apathetic or too concerned with ones own consequences (self interest) to make a decision but I see your point.
@ameliadeering88437 жыл бұрын
a lot of people would do that in reality, because no one wants to be responsible for a death. What they don't realise is that if you did nothing and watched, you would still be responsable, but of the 5 deaths - because it was in your power to flick the switch. Its the same logic as say, a cameraman filming torture is as guilty as the one inflicting the torture. Doing nothing does not protect you from your responsability as a human being!
@annabelledsouza015 жыл бұрын
Can we just take a moment to appreciate the beautiful animation? It's so smooth and relaxing to look at ❤️
@proxxgeo10545 жыл бұрын
mysticalunicorn 13 no
@annabelledsouza015 жыл бұрын
@@proxxgeo1054 that's ok if you don't want to :)
@sens-cel135 жыл бұрын
@@annabelledsouza01 I agree , that a beautiful animation to enjoy.
@pinkypie1235 жыл бұрын
@@annabelledsouza01 Ok!
@opal61845 жыл бұрын
His voice too
@covelt4 жыл бұрын
I'll just call Bob the Builder, if he can't fix it, then no one can.
@Olive-ey1cc3 жыл бұрын
It’s big brain time
@cptyolowaffle3 жыл бұрын
nah man, Micheal and Son "If you cant, we can, Micheal and Son, ba dum ba!"
@atlaslogan7503 жыл бұрын
MHM…. FIX IT FELIX
@niltomega29783 жыл бұрын
I think its also a demonstration of "gut instinct". I realize this is not a proper or professional term but we are often told to trust it. I think our subconscious can often assemble past experiences and tell us what it the right thing to do while our conscious mind cannot define why.
@WomanSlayer694203 жыл бұрын
This question would be much harder to answer if the trolley was heading towards the one person, but the one person is someone you love, and the five are strangers and you have the choice to flip the switch to divert the trolley to the five instead of killing the person you love. If you answer to divert it to the five, you have the mindset of a well-written villain in a story.
@loneoutsider80043 жыл бұрын
My family always come first, no matter what.
@cattus85563 жыл бұрын
@@whatyouwaitingfor1027 you wouldnt even have the balls to sacrifice yourself.
@psihostrumpf62333 жыл бұрын
I don't think so. Actually it would be much easier for me. There is an angelic creature on this planet named Henriette. 5 strangers are not nearly enough to make me think about letting her go. Maybe 5 billions might make me think twice... but, i believe that i would say ''sorry'' to all 5 billions of them and the rest of their families as i'm switching that switch. Piece of cake...
@geethanjali87173 жыл бұрын
@@psihostrumpf6233 This reminds me of Iron Man's situation in the endgame🥺
@ethanliang18363 жыл бұрын
tell your family to get off the track and then run over the 5 strangers
@warmpereer654 жыл бұрын
Imagine if the two-year-old kid who killed all 6 is the right choice for this problem.
@madeleineeig41783 жыл бұрын
that’s where i came from 💀
@formerunsecretarygeneralba95363 жыл бұрын
What if all 6 of them are nazis?
@K_Rudi3 жыл бұрын
I came to watch this after that
@grownupgaming3 жыл бұрын
@Adel Eljawad Yes, that it's hella funny to say "ut oh" after all six die
@siopal90213 жыл бұрын
@@formerunsecretarygeneralba9536 diffrent version of the problem
@jeikowb7 жыл бұрын
3:01 if you don't know what the fill tool in MS Paint is.
@otesunki6 жыл бұрын
Haha
@supertrain12366 жыл бұрын
Lol.
@saoirsestark39035 жыл бұрын
hahahaha true
@Locket.L2 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: If you let the trains drive into the 5 people, it wouldn’t count as murder since it was bound to happen anyways. If you turn the cart into that one person, it would technically count as murder, since it was caused by you, whether the intention was good or not. Personally, I would just act like I didn’t notice the lever and rush in to try and do something, as if I was panicking. Edit: You guys have really enlightened me as to how wrong I was. From now on, I firmly believe in moving the train to kill one person then stomping the other five people to death.
@zarifshoeb2 жыл бұрын
Yea sure but it’ll also be explainable if you let the 1 person die instead of the 5. I can’t live the rest of my life knowing I could’ve saved 5 lives by sacrificing just 1. That’s just me.
@Locket.L2 жыл бұрын
@@zarifshoeb I couldn’t live with myself knowing that I am the direct cause of the death to someone.
@kingdribs92862 жыл бұрын
Exactly. It isn't my problem to fix so I'll just let them get ran over by the train
@karak_t97542 жыл бұрын
@@Locket.L I would my life very happily if I knew that i saved 5 people instead of just 1...
@Locket.L2 жыл бұрын
@@karak_t9754 personally I would be depressed that I murdered one person, no matter how many people on the other side died.
@marvelousmeh20774 жыл бұрын
Michael: "Keep the train on the track with the five people. Then use a long pole with a blade to slice of the head of the other one."
@steelburst93564 жыл бұрын
Stop copying the good place
@cinnabunelizabeth9154 жыл бұрын
It’s called *quoting*
@mustafaal-nidawi28384 жыл бұрын
LMAO I remember that 😭😭😭😂
@ujwalpandey39684 жыл бұрын
It sounds like something Dwight would say not Michael
@cinnabunelizabeth9154 жыл бұрын
Michael from good place not the office
@duolingobird95825 жыл бұрын
“This is why everyone hates moral philosophy professors.”
@jungshook45185 жыл бұрын
Duolingo Bird THE GOOD PLACE OMG💀♥️♥️
@joytutherworld42245 жыл бұрын
Duolingo Bird I love the Good Place.... lol Chidi 😂
@spacegoblin03345 жыл бұрын
Chidi 😭
@ReviloBeats5 жыл бұрын
Duolingo Bird this is why I came 😂
@divyarai80305 жыл бұрын
@Epic Terry what if they were the enemies ?
@Emma-db2nj3 жыл бұрын
0:27 Narrator: Would you sacrifice one person to save 5? The five: *intense nodding*
@luluyt31133 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHA
@GogoGaga73523 жыл бұрын
No I will Kill 5 to save 1
@Nickys_Corner3 жыл бұрын
My sis said it doesn’t matter since everyone’s dying She’ll grow up to be a wonderful philosopher
@kuhukuhu61423 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@SofiaMCVega3 жыл бұрын
Hahaha😂 I didn't even see that.
@summermackay7924 Жыл бұрын
I think the reason people are so contrary to the first decision when presented with the bridge version is because of how they perceive the aftermath would be like. More specifically a conversation about your choice. It would be a lot easier telling someone you flipped the switch because you felt like you had no choice, rather than push a man because you felt like you had no choice. Only one is considered deliberate murder. The other one is not.
@konodioda32834 жыл бұрын
Simple, move the person who’s by himself to the other track. Don’t divert the trolley. Then once everyone’s dead, blow up the trolley and get rid of all witnesses. While you’re at it destroy the world, no, the universe.
@No-ej5jz4 жыл бұрын
Dont forget to say "Uh oh"
@konodioda32834 жыл бұрын
@@No-ej5jz Yes
@konodioda32834 жыл бұрын
@@fishgarbage16 you don’t have to wear a mask if every living thing is dead
@davidwoek30414 жыл бұрын
Just accelerate time and reset the entire universe!
@konodioda32834 жыл бұрын
@@fishgarbage16 Hence my point
@souravzzz7 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to say that the animations were really well done.
@frozenfeet45347 жыл бұрын
I especially love the bird at 3:42.
@MarioRivera-png7 жыл бұрын
The animation was done in blender. www.blendernation.com/2017/01/16/ted-video-trolley-problem/
@glowcone7 жыл бұрын
I scrolled through the comments looking for this. Was not disappointed :D
@supermonkeykid42877 жыл бұрын
Isaiah Rivera yay
@supermonkeykid42877 жыл бұрын
U Wot M8 You What Mate
@BruhIRLdan7 жыл бұрын
Here's another way to think about it: What if you were the one person on the track and you could still change where the train is going? Would you sacrifice your life?
@GianlucaAiello7 жыл бұрын
Multybrendan Honestly, only if they are my friends, familiars, or childs.
@Sophie-dx2of7 жыл бұрын
Multybrendan yes I would safcrife myself
@shxdyneo72987 жыл бұрын
Then I'd be extinct
@StephenHughes217 жыл бұрын
nope, rip those five people
@Shouko917 жыл бұрын
Multybrendan if you can't find something to live for, find something to die for
@avdollo2 жыл бұрын
i will forever stand by the answer of leaving the lever in whatever position it was in when you were presented the problem. my reasoning is that if this situation were happening and no one were around to see it, that would be what happens. so i don’t find myself at fault when the outcome would have happened had i been there or jot.
@zarifshoeb2 жыл бұрын
Yes but you’ll be living the rest of your life knowing that you could’ve saved 5 lives by sacrificing just 1. I can’t.
@IsraelCervantes-le4gf Жыл бұрын
@@zarifshoebkilling Is a heinous crime, should a surgeon then kill a non consenting person to save 10 people who need organ replacements? Doing that would undermine your right to privacy, autonomy, dignity, etc.
@naz6james5705 ай бұрын
You cant even handle your feelings got hurt? 😂 Thats pathetic. I know how to solve this riddle and matter of fact I am gonna stop the train. If Im in that position, I would've pull the track towards that one person, and jump on that track and try to save that one person as quickly as I can. Now, there is another possible outcome, either we both died or we both make it, but it doesn't matter. That train is trying to put a blame on you for killing at first, but guess who's to blame now😤 I become a legend, because one day, I know there will be a day where that train will stop taking lives because of me, even after I've long gone.
@makisekurisu85945 жыл бұрын
Oh no! They’re wearing AirPods they can’t hear us!😱
@myismidas5 жыл бұрын
RUN THEM OVER
@yuy23755 жыл бұрын
divert the trolley to wherever u(conan) are. they gonna die anyway lol
@David-tn9oi5 жыл бұрын
Conan Edogawa AirPods are actually really bad at blocking out noise so we would definitely hear you
@David-tn9oi5 жыл бұрын
mr theawesome but it’s still true and the apple earphones are pretty much the same as the AirPods 😂 the AirPods are just slightly smaller in ear and a bit louder
@dimensionalblade27785 жыл бұрын
If it is you no one will die
@raydanz5 жыл бұрын
Change the question "...if one person on the other track is your friend."
@bobtheagent90875 жыл бұрын
More like a mother or wife
@nacnac77325 жыл бұрын
Bob T haha xD
@justmart44555 жыл бұрын
*Joel intensifies*
@philsmith44824 жыл бұрын
Then most definitely the 5 ppl that it would have hit accidentally instead of consciously having it hit my friend
@phystem14 жыл бұрын
Hmm. One side is your wife who is pregnant. Other side is your family, with brother and his fiance
@a_lovely_name97384 жыл бұрын
"Obviously the dilemma is clear, how do you kill all 6 people?"
@meco79564 жыл бұрын
LOL
@zowashere72734 жыл бұрын
That's easy MULTI-TRACK DRIFTING
@megelizabeth94924 жыл бұрын
[Holds up drawing of said solution] So, I would dangle a sharp blade out the window to slice the neck of the guy on the other track as we smush our five main guys.
@nunooliveira98744 жыл бұрын
Id make 7
@nopity30574 жыл бұрын
I think you miscounted, it's 7 people you forgot to count yourself in the equation.
@ryanmcrorie78762 жыл бұрын
To me, pulling the lever knowing that the worker will die makes you equally responsible as pushing the man off.
@clarinet10592 жыл бұрын
Doesn’t matter how you put it, the only correct answer is to let the 5 people die.
@lalalalalalala1794 жыл бұрын
Come here from "A 2 Years Old's Solution to Trolley Problem" video
@RandomPerson-no7rx4 жыл бұрын
Me2
@sam-dz4sj4 жыл бұрын
Same
@evanreloadingbazookagaming16994 жыл бұрын
What was the solution?
@kerbodynamicx4724 жыл бұрын
That’s the best solution
@jonasgould24774 жыл бұрын
youtube algorithm bringing people together again
@queenelizabeththe3rd9584 жыл бұрын
if you drifted the train you would be able to hit all of them
@concon60124 жыл бұрын
Strike!
@mirogaming19824 жыл бұрын
R/cursedcomment
@justmonika74154 жыл бұрын
Multi-track drifting
@alexac.92954 жыл бұрын
weeeeee
@the_mariocrafter4 жыл бұрын
Just like the kid did.
@midnighteevee42465 жыл бұрын
i keep coming back to this riddle because of how satisfying the animations are. especially the part at 3:40, the animator's way of conceptualizing the script in this video is amazing
@elitechampion10 ай бұрын
This question is so easy to answer in our society of law suits. Obviously you would not touch anything, being directly responsible for just one person's death would be the end of your life, no matter how many people you saved. However, nobody can go after you because you didn't act fast enough to save 5 people. It's not your place to judge the importance of that one person's live relatively to that of the other 5.
@jjingjaykay5 жыл бұрын
I would have froze and let the 5 die. The burden of directly causing one's death is too much to bear as compared to the burden of not doing anything and letting it run its course taking the 5 lives as if you were not there.
@shlomolevi5555 жыл бұрын
Don't you think knowing you could have saved four lives is a bigger burden?
@sylicone69525 жыл бұрын
jjingjaykay But then you actually have the choices of "kill one person" or "kill five people". The reason why you chose "kill five people" is because you think you're not "held responsible". Well it turns out you're actually held responsible, you had those two choices. Doesn't mean if you do anything doesn't mean you're not held responsible. Example: You have a taser for some reason. Suddenly a person who is *clearly* a robber(with valuables and has no way of harming you) is being chased by the police. That robber is heading you're way and you have 2 choices: "use the taser to stop the robber" or "do nothing and let the robber escape". If you chose to do nothing, you're still responsible for the robber escaping.
@thefirsttime77595 жыл бұрын
Its still a choice, you are choosing to kill 5 people
@youngcitybandit5 жыл бұрын
@@sylicone6952 The is not a similar situation. Even then you are not RESPONSIBLE for the robbers escape. The reason I say they are not the same situation is because in your scenario, there is no sacrifice being made. You know theres a robber being chased and you can make the decision to stop him or dont but if you were to stop him you havent sacrificed anything (like how you sacrificed the single persons life in the trolley problem). The discourse for this scenario will be different from the trolley problem. Now as for why you wouldnt be responsible. It is simply because you do not have the burden to do something for the greater good, that is not how it works. If you pull that lever to kill the individual person, you did not save 5 people, you just killed 1 person. This is because there is no reason for you as an individual to save those 5 people from something occuring thats not your responsibility. You are not the cause of them being strapped there and thus you are not the one responsible to save them. You being a bystander is not morally wrong, it just means you did not interfere and if you did, you are responsible for whatever happened.
@youngcitybandit5 жыл бұрын
@@sylicone6952 apologies I cannot really put my thought in the most eloquent way possible but my point is that you being a bystander in something you have nothing to do with is morally ok. If you pull that lever you are the cause of that single mans death. You did not save those 5 people because once you pull that lever, they are not in need of saving, you are now in the timeline where you take actions into your own hand and just murder someone instead. Obviously this is a morally gray situation, neither options are objectively right or wrong. But i think thats my take on it as logically as possible
@ntsazazel7 жыл бұрын
To anyone talking about these stupid loopholes, THAT IS NOT THE POINT. The point of the experiment is to toy with our emotions and make us think about morality. You aren't being clever by "telling them to get off the track", you're just missing the point by trying to "win" in a lose-lose situation.
@ntsazazel7 жыл бұрын
I'm not TRYING to be clever by "telling people what to do". I'm making a point on how everyone coming up with these loopholes are missing the point. The goal of the problem is to make you think, not to try and find a loophole. It's like trying to solve "shrodingers (I probably spelled that wrong) cat by saying "I would open the box". It's not clever, it's just an excuse to make a joke.
@ntsazazel7 жыл бұрын
I get that they're trying to have fun, but I feel like there's a distinct line between people who are just doing it for a joke and people who just couldn't be bothered to think about the question and instead chose to be a smartass. I can see that my original comment was too harsh, but there's still an element of truth to it.
@elijahbryce29227 жыл бұрын
tbh, I think it's moreover the fact that they don't want to accept the fact that they have to make a crucial decision in an unavoidable life-death situation. Just an add on.
@austritistan33377 жыл бұрын
You are being bothered by people just discovering loopholes in the problems, and you instantly assume that they're just being smartass, do you see the problem here? By pointing out the loopholes in this riddle they're not participating into the test by answering the question, but that doesn't instantly make them an immoral and unethical human being, the way you assumed them to be, it's just that they choose to use complex reasoning (Like how deliberately pulling the lever and killing one person would be considered as a murder) over feelings. Again, that doesn't make them immoral and unethical
@NoOne-ky1er6 жыл бұрын
Anon Battery He just commented here, How is he Trying To Force his views.
@Dynoboot3 жыл бұрын
This hypothetical dilemma is what's happening in hospitals right now. It's the choice of using a bed for one Covid19 patient for 20 days, or for 5 to 10 other patients who need some form of surgery and would use the bed for just a few days.
@omaralqau90083 жыл бұрын
A bed???
@Dynoboot3 жыл бұрын
@@omaralqau9008 Yes, a bed in a hospital. As in the space a patient takes up while getting treatment in a hospital. Limited amount of beds equals limited amount of patients. And if you don't treat a patient for a serious condition, they might die.
@omaralqau90083 жыл бұрын
@@Dynoboot the space a patient takes up ohhh
@davidvarley18122 жыл бұрын
Thomas van Dijk, your correct. At the beginning of the pandemic my government had to decide whether to put a elderly covid 19 person in a care home with other elderly people or allow a young person to die because there were no free hospital beds. They had to choose between loosing many old people or a few young people. Never considered that before, thanks.
@omaralqau90082 жыл бұрын
@@davidvarley1812 lose elderly because young people can reproduce
@shreyasphanipendyala10082 жыл бұрын
This is very easy ngl The 5 workers are basically stuck on the track; so they need help The one worker is not stuck (still working) so he/she will 100% escape the trolley cause they're free to Therefore, I would flip the switch, saving the 5 workers (and no one would die)
@andyrebelo4 жыл бұрын
I love how people here are building scenarios based on the problem like "have the one worker go save the other five". It shows the lengths they'd go to not answer this moral dilemma.
@juliopcrj4 жыл бұрын
@ゴゴ Joji Joestar ゴゴ In this scenario, 5 workers are unable to move, on the main tracks of an incoming trolley. The fact that they didn't check the trolley schedule is what put them in that situation. If they had checked beforehand, they would have waited until the trolley passed by, before doing work. On the other hand, the other guy was working on the safe path, probably aware that a trolley would not pass by him. Changing the path means you activelly punish a person for doing the right choices, while saving the ones who chose poorly.
@juliopcrj4 жыл бұрын
It's not "that version". If the 5 people die, they are responsible for their deaths, since they went there. If you move the lever, YOU are responsible for the 1 person death.
@bigSpidermanfan4 жыл бұрын
Y'all-Qaeda Yeehawdist no, that’s the way I see it too. If you want to answer a deep moral question, you must think deeply about it, and that’s the conclusion I came to as well. For me, it would feel wrong to pull the lever, and that’s the only reason I can think of as to why.
@bigSpidermanfan4 жыл бұрын
Julio Pinto Coelho And I think this is why people don’t want to push the large man over. All the workers, including the one on the safe track, should be aware that they are doing a dangerous job. Even the one on the safe track should be aware of the possibility of the lever being switched. The large man, however, didn’t put himself in harm’s way in the way the workers did. You could argue that the man should be aware of the possibility of someone pushing him over, but that it a less likely possibility.
@bigSpidermanfan4 жыл бұрын
Julio Pinto Coelho I did think of a different, more unrealistic version, however. Let’s say instead of workers that chose to be there, some alien or powerful being teleported 5 people at random onto one track and one person at random onto the other. I guess I would pull the lever. But with the large man on the bridge scenario, and with these 5 people who have been teleported at random, I’m not sure. Maybe the large man is less innocent since the likelihood of being pushed over is greater than the likelihood of being teleported at random. But I still can’t help but feel that the large man should make the choice to sacrifice himself instead of someone else pushing him over. And perhaps I could say that the large man was teleported onto the edge of the bridge, so they’re all equally innocent. So with the lever scenario, the one person can’t make the choice to sacrifice themself. But the large man can. But I guess you could say he is unaware of what is going on, and he is both blind and deaf, so you can’t make him aware. So then he really wouldn’t have that choice. Perhaps I would push him over after all.
@thecourier90935 жыл бұрын
"A small price to pay for salvation"
@drd.n46955 жыл бұрын
Sounds very Abrahamic
@BlitzKriegPlays5 жыл бұрын
Origin?
@BlitzKriegPlays5 жыл бұрын
where is this quote from ?
@ShadowKing-th8cj5 жыл бұрын
chinchin 1 From movie avengers endgame
@morgangao70425 жыл бұрын
chinchin 1 Thanos says it in Avengers: Infinity War
@NoIGN5 жыл бұрын
In either cases, I would do nothing. Not gonna risk some lawsuit for people I don't know.
@taylanbasaran28305 жыл бұрын
The most logical solution.
@fadumomohamed76384 жыл бұрын
@123fort andbree I think she means that if she pulled the lever she would be actively/willingly killing someone where as if she did nothing things would happen as it was meant to be. If she didn't do anything she would be considered a bystander and people wouldn't be on her, but if she willingly killed someone, that would bring up many issues, and lets not forget the media, they would blow it up then everyone in America will feel like they should have a say. Heck people would attack her, and she could probs lose her job. -of course if it were me id want to be saved, but if I were the one with the power to decide, I'd....regret whatever decision I made.
@mickeythedogo7034 жыл бұрын
@123fort andbree yeah, a death for me, sounds like a win :') -jkdontlinkmeupwithpreventsuicidehotlines-
@223antemerediem24 жыл бұрын
@@mickeythedogo703 haha you did the funny
@haatshepsut48624 жыл бұрын
I will run
@SafirAksel3 жыл бұрын
All these transitions and symbolism is such an eye candy.
@kurtianpaulvigafria40684 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who thought of it as "The guy clearly knows that trains go over that track, so CLEARLY he wants to die"
@fitriaahsani12864 жыл бұрын
That's exactly what i thought too! Why should i move the rail just to save some amount of people who bravely take the risk?
@eris13014 жыл бұрын
Dym the five ppl or the one person? Either way its a runaway trolley, also theyre working wdym "CLEARLY" yes ofc they know trains run over that track but only when they arent there meaning a schedule or sm like that but since its a runaway trolley theres no way tehy couldve known
@fitriaahsani12864 жыл бұрын
@@eris1301 ooh thanks for pointing that out, i missed that 'runaway' trolley....... But i don't change my answer, welp, if the fate wants to kill those 5 people, i won't change the rail path (?) to someone else 😅
@chailatte85594 жыл бұрын
I shout to that one person working "HEY GET OUT OF THE TRACKS"
@voldemortthenoselessfreak21263 жыл бұрын
Finally found a similar answer to mine.
@pazifix22823 жыл бұрын
What if the person cant hear you because he is a construction worker and has headphones on that prevent him from hearing you?
@VikasYadav-wd9yw3 жыл бұрын
@@pazifix2282 your choice, your action, your consequence
@ii_gabrielle23913 жыл бұрын
ye. Tell the worker to move to the middle side
@danieldavid37663 жыл бұрын
In the real Trolley Problem, all the workers are turned around and have noise cancelling headphones.
@Cwrigz5 жыл бұрын
What if the 5 people have no family but that worker has a huge family and kids
@zulthyr18525 жыл бұрын
Exactly.
@chenugent5 жыл бұрын
This is beginning to feel like saw 6
@sarahhamdan54705 жыл бұрын
Exactlllly you never know what is going on, what if the trolly is going to run out of gas before it kills those people! I am sorry but no human is at a place where they could decide who dies and who doesn't!!
@chenugent5 жыл бұрын
Sarah Hamdan good point
@smallorphan11925 жыл бұрын
Cwrigz Then that one man must be punished for the contribution of over population which is initially the main cause of earths destructions, poor economic, etc.
@notsafeforchurch3 жыл бұрын
Any possibility that we take into account how difficult it would be to be in that situation, and not blame the person for either choice?
@albert2764 жыл бұрын
I’ve wondered the difference when it’s one person that you know, to save five strangers.
@rhythmbhati75124 жыл бұрын
@Scott Scotty well idk if a baby would be working on tracks 😳
@rhythmbhati75124 жыл бұрын
@Scott Scotty maybe im being s-sarcastic?
@evantanuwidjaja80173 жыл бұрын
@Scott Scotty he is being sarcastic by tbe fact that he used an emoji
@nicolassalazar4573 жыл бұрын
Ive wondered if the best choice is to flick the switch with your eyes closed back and forth as quick as you can and then stop at random, and whatever the choice happened to be, we let it happen.
@arandomguy44093 жыл бұрын
@@nicolassalazar457 real answer: force someone to do it for you :D
@bradyjensen94603 жыл бұрын
1:49 we just gonna ignore the fact this man shifted from 2 dimensional to 3 dimensional
@herfan16893 жыл бұрын
He was trying to appeal to your mercy by becoming more real. Like how Janet in the good place tries to stop people from pressing her reboot switch
@milkimusic66833 жыл бұрын
I mean ttrue
@chetanrajput38984 жыл бұрын
1:54 Everyone's gangsta until the train doesn't get stop by the large man and also kills remaining 5.
@raymondpereira99473 жыл бұрын
Yeah I was thinking what if I don't do it right, if I don't have the skill.
@sukhmandersingh43063 жыл бұрын
Everybody a gangasta until the large man drops you instead
@shivanshgarewal28333 жыл бұрын
6 kills
@shivanshgarewal28333 жыл бұрын
BTW how that large man is large if he gets pushed by us that easily and even if we try to do it he would rather puch us instead
@WesternOhioInterurbanHistory3 жыл бұрын
Thats exactly what would happen in real life lol
@SomeoneSomeone-h7e2 ай бұрын
Just walk away that way nobodies life is in your hands and you feel no regrets, as opposed to feeling the regret of taking that one persons life.As a cartoon character once said, ''dont be afraid to walk away''😅
@CzarsSalad6 жыл бұрын
The Good Place brought me here.
@i_heart_portal_games69766 жыл бұрын
Same
@nishit71475 жыл бұрын
The narrator is named Eleanor.
@fernydyke5 жыл бұрын
Nishit Singh not the narrator
@kaluda12145 жыл бұрын
Rocio Rodas r/wooooosh
@fernydyke5 жыл бұрын
Inessa Leonova k
@bunhee2313 жыл бұрын
What many people in the comments don't seem to understand is that the Train track dilemma is just a hypothetical situation being used to represent a real life concept: would you sacrifice one to save five. It doesn't matter if you can derail the train or move the people off the tracks. The train does not matter, it just creates a visual example for an ethical concept(which has actually happened before)
@jaded8itch Жыл бұрын
I don't believe people should be sacrificing other people. Sacrifice yourself, not a stranger. Unless they're proven to be deranged and vile.
@_hrzn Жыл бұрын
@@jaded8itch what if say you aren't exactly on the bridge, and instead you can push a button that pushes the same man of the bridge?
@Thex1xManBetter Жыл бұрын
@@jaded8itch🙄🙄🙄🙄
@ThatGuy-tx4vm10 ай бұрын
@@jaded8itchwhat if the one person is 90 years old and the 5 are kids?? and you are 25??? The 90 year old has lived. Everybody gets his time to do the same.
@elparallel1764 жыл бұрын
The first word of the video: "Imagine" Solution of the problem: STOP IMAGINING
@AyushKumar06253 жыл бұрын
Is you Pic is of Ruk-Chan ?
@AyushKumar06253 жыл бұрын
Ruka
@nathanm57053 ай бұрын
I've recently self-published a novel that might be of interest to people who are interested in the trolley problem :) It's called The Decision by Nathan McGregor and the plot is centred around a similar ethical dilemma. It's available in Kindle and paperback format.
@Xcallion3 жыл бұрын
Another variant I heard of the trolley problem that really made a lot of people uncomfortable was a scenario in which you are a master surgeon. You have one completely healthy person and 5 people who are dying of various organ failures. If you were to dismantle the completely healthy person and transfer his working organs to all the sick people you can save all of their lives, but the healthy person would die.
@GunNr- Жыл бұрын
This is simple, depends on whether or not the healthy individual agrees to donate his or her organs.
@shukriahmed7287 Жыл бұрын
I think it depends on the 5 people. Did they cause that illness/organ failure themselves as a result of unhealthy living and bad choices? Will they make the same mistake, causing them to be sick again? Was it caused by something out of their control? I think there are a lot of things that need to be considered.
@TheGregamonster Жыл бұрын
That's a totally different scenario because the master surgeon took a hippocratic oath, that they would never use their medical knowledge to intentionally harm people. Dismantling the healthy person would be a clear violation of that, regardless of the total good that could be achieved. A bystander witnessing a runaway trolley has made no such oath, and is only bound to take the action they consider to result in the most good.
@cems2533 Жыл бұрын
Easy not kill the healthy person
@IsraelCervantes-le4gf Жыл бұрын
I literally thought of this 2 min ago and i Made a comment, i swear to god i had not read your comment nor that perspective.
@brangja48153 жыл бұрын
"The hardest choice requires the strongest will"-Thanos
@truonghoang78123 жыл бұрын
Me: *pulls out the plug and 8n the process destroying every sentinent life within the a.i and leaving them in eternal oblivion* yes
@milkimusic66833 жыл бұрын
Ruined 202 likes :(
@nithin78743 жыл бұрын
Snap!
@jcdaboss78592 жыл бұрын
How about the train driver just use an emergency brake?
@adammohamedmokhtar99615 жыл бұрын
This is my thought, not sure why I would feel this way but here goes: If you switch the button/lever ~ you place a concious inside of you that tells you that you killed 1 person. You made that decision so you will most likely label yourself as a murderer for the rest of your life. Further, by letting that one person die, it will be one of the biggest trauma to you, as that is the first time you will have ever allowed yourself to let someone die. I feel that this will make you keep thinking about that 1 person you "killed" and haunt you after the tragedy. However, If you leave the 5, consciously you would want to save them, but you think that decision-wise, its not majorly your fault. You think, how did they get tied up? Who put them there? It was too late for me to help, but you will assume theres more factors to this with the biggest assumption is that there is someone else at fault. And allowing those 5 to die, sets up trauma in your mind, but it doesnt equate to your decision to letting the 1 person die, as you wont be able to think about each and every person after the tragedy. There will be so much that your mind will conciously try to stop that trauma. I'm not so sure, I feel like letting 1 die here has greater consequences on your mental state and more so than letting the 5 die. Though I can contradict that letting 5 die might make you feel like it's okay to keep doing it in the future, which can be so terrible if you keep this same mindset in every tragic thought experiments like this
@troythemighty36835 жыл бұрын
Adam Mohamed Mokhtar Yea it wouldn’t feel right to intentionally let that 1 person die when. I feel like letting those 5 people die is out of your hands. Because whoever’s mistake it was to have the people on tracks at that time is to blame, not me. And by choosing to end ones life instead of five inserts You into the mix
@troythemighty36835 жыл бұрын
Adam Mohamed Mokhtar I would just pray for the sake of the 5 people
@adammohamedmokhtar99615 жыл бұрын
@Joseph I dont think you really have the power to "stop it." It's a case of either 1 dies or 5 and both decisions ultimately become immoral when you do create a decision. Hence why, I think the best move is to do what's best for you and in this case to protect your mental state. And sometimes letting go, is what stops us from hurting ourselves.
@adammohamedmokhtar99615 жыл бұрын
@Joseph totally cool, we can agree to disagree :) so in order to prevent the worst outcome from happening, how do you define "worst"? Is 5 people always a worse situation? What If the 5 people were murderers? Would you save them? Or what If the 1 person was your loved one or a young child? Who would you choose to "let" them die or live? So yeah i think I'd be subjective to say what is worse - everyone has different opinions.
@abidemasri66365 жыл бұрын
As a man who values true equality i suggest that anyone who is on any track should be killed. If the trolley doesn't end them, the leaver puller you kill the ones left alive to enact equality. If i was one of the people who were on the track this is how i want it done anyways.
@teaguel001 Жыл бұрын
The answer to both scenarios were simple to me. 1 or 5? - Flip the switch to save the 5, run and try to get the 1 worker's attention to move. If I have time to flip a switch, even if it's a couple of seconds before the split, I have time to move my body wheather or not I make it in time to the 1. Push the bigger guy to save 5? - No. Jump myself and form a tight ball inbetween the rails, close to either side of a rail. If that fails, I never took another person's life for the chance of it failing.
@assarlannerborn9342 Жыл бұрын
No human would sacrifice themselves like that😂
@teaguel001 Жыл бұрын
@@assarlannerborn9342 Maybe not you
@skakar7 жыл бұрын
This was so well illustrated. Good job guys
@blurberrycreative19966 жыл бұрын
To me it's the same-same. Flip the switch. Push the man. You caused that worker's/man's death. Thing I'm not sure about is would I do it to save five people? Or be a witness because choosing whether or not people die is not necessarily my decision to make. Not to mention this question: Is that one person worth more than five people? If he is, what if something changes in one of those five (or more) that make them more worthy later on? Ugh philosophy.
@danielyourestillachad55426 жыл бұрын
your mcm thinks this is deep
@manile64666 жыл бұрын
BlurBerry Creative One life can outweigh all 5 if it was for example your lover, your mother/father or any close person to you. That's what makes it more complicated.
@asnalem43916 жыл бұрын
When the Sun Rises no, it's the best, if you believe killing one person is better than letting 5 die then you have no grounds to refusing a doctor to let people die to harvest their organs for people that need a donor, just replace the train with illness and it's the exact same thing, (the one person could be saved and the others wouldn't die without the one person dying) so that's why I'd choose to do nothing. Also "one of the worst"? There are only 2 choices it's not like there are multiple choices to the trolley problem...
@asnalem43916 жыл бұрын
When the Sun Rises Ok I'll break it down more, so: In the doctor's analogy let's say there is one person that is the only compatible donor for other 5 people that need organ donations to survive and they need different organs so their death can save all five of them. Not pulling the lever and letting the train run over the 5 people equals letting the disease kill the five people that need organs and treating the person that can be saved with just an operation. And flipping the switch and letting the one person get hit by the train, equals letting the one patient die to save the five people that need the organs. Would you be fine with that happening in the real world? Might not always be 1 person saves 5 people situation but we are always out of compatible organ donors all over the world so 1 person saves more people by donating all organs is a very real situation. Since you think it is morally right to pull the lever would you be ok with doctors letting patients die if they qualify as organ donors?
@jacelynr89406 жыл бұрын
Your both opinion is correct but sometimes you need to choose one of them. Even what you doing is Factually right its doesn't mean that you always morally right. Sacrificing one person to save 5 live is logicaly right but it morally wrong, that's why most people in that situation choose to not doing anything. Imagine if that one person is your loved ones or family, can you sacrifice them for 5 people that has nothing to do with you? In that case what would you do? Who will you choose to death? There's nothing free in this world. The one who cannot sacrifice anything cannot change anything. In my perspective that is the moral you can get from this story
@mugensamurai6 жыл бұрын
This would change the Sokovia Accords. It's not your fault Scarlet Witch.
@heyitsme35486 жыл бұрын
mugensamurai i understood that reference
@antsee13216 жыл бұрын
mugensamurai YES YES SOMEONE MAKE THIS VIDEO VIRAL SO THAT ALL MARVAL FANS CAN UNDERSTAND
@noabsolutelynot36606 жыл бұрын
Superhuman registration act. The comics came first.
@rafliavriza36516 жыл бұрын
She killed many people, if she were smart enough, he would let Cap died. #peace
@harleysu56446 жыл бұрын
"We don't trade lives, captain"
@PokeGamer0252 ай бұрын
I simply won’t touch the lever, because in that case I didn’t cause a death, the train company did, for letting the train go rogue. If I hit the lever, I’ll be partially responsible for the death.
@charlottemoo93974 жыл бұрын
Eleanor from The Good Place: kill all of them! Chidi: *confused screaming*
@ClairandHerImaginaryCat4 жыл бұрын
charlotte the cow finally a The Good Place comment! The teller of this video is also named Eleanor lol
@charlottemoo93974 жыл бұрын
Clair Tang what a coincidence! Lol
@misterfancy95284 жыл бұрын
Keep it [SPOILERS]
@naomi-gu1gh4 жыл бұрын
U mean Michael lol
@PeterDivine7 жыл бұрын
"Unrealistic"? Let me give you a realistic version of the fat-man scenario, then: A doctor is on shift at a hospital. He has five different patients, each with an incurable disease isolated to a different organ of their body: One has a tumor in the lungs, the second has a heart with corroded valves, the third has liver damage, _et cetera._ Patient #6 comes in for a surgery, but it's nothing life-threatening- he'll need to be anesthetized, but his damage is ultimately temporary. As the doctor's working, though, he notes that patient #6 is a perfect donor match for all his other patients. And he's in perfect health, too- none of his organs have any issues at all... Does this sound like an "unrealistic" scenario? Because this is the path that pushing the fat man takes us down.
@Noschool1007 жыл бұрын
i mean it is the path both push us down. all cases require you to take action to prevent five deaths and cause 1.
@tired6907 жыл бұрын
Your scenario is just as unrealistic (if not more) as the one shown in the video. The chances of one person being a donor match for five other people is highly unlikely, if it did happen, the chances of all five in the same hospital as the person is just as unlikely. Your scenario works on coincidence and nothing else. And besides the doctor can't give the people the organs without that one person's consent, Clconsidering it's their organs being giving away.
@Noschool1007 жыл бұрын
Imnotsurewhat tomakemyusername there are ways to make it realistic, like what if you could save one younger life or 2 people by sacrificing a person. plus requiring concent may not lead to the best outcome for everyone. like if somebody got an incurable disease but wasn't quarantined because they didn't give concent puts a lot of people at risk.
@PeterDivine7 жыл бұрын
I guarantee you it's not that far-fetched, mate. Statistics all but guarantees it. Nearly 40% of the U.S. population is o-positive; another 35% are A-negative. Assuming you're the less common of the two, just for the sake of argument, the chance of you having the same blood type of five other people in a hospital is .35 ^ 5. Now, statistics says that only about 40 or so people per 1,000 need to visit a hospital before age 35 ( politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-odds-of-going-to-hospital.html#.WHjUp_krLZY ), so that puts you at about a 4% chance, again raised by 5 for the other blokes. Our math so far gives you a 5.37824 x 10 ^ -10, which really does sound outlandish. Here's the kicker, though- this needs to be multiplied by the entire U.S. population. 320,000,000. This gives us, in total, about a 17% chance that an A- negative person is in a hospital, same as 5 others with his blood-type. Now, there are other factors to consider- this math only takes into people in hospitals across the U.S, not hospitals nearby themselves; organs harvested in New York are probably useless to hospitals in Arizona, regardless of necessity. Furthermore, admittance to a hospital is not any guarantee of life-saving surgery or surgery requiring anesthesia. But there are factors weighing in the equation's favor, too, boosting its probability. For one, this hypothetical is only for the A-positive group, not the statistically larger O-negative one. And for another, utilitarianism only requires the greatest amount of good to the largest number of people; so long as that integer is greater than 1, utility-wise, it's still the better judgment. What happens when you only need organs to save _three_ people? What happens when you only need organs to save _two_? As for consent.... well, no one asked the fat man's opinions before they pushed him, did they?
@inkuii7 жыл бұрын
Assuming that the tumor is operable, take the tumor out of the first guy's lungs, get the second guy some artificial heart valves, remove the damaged parts of the liver from the third one: the liver is the only organ in the body that can regenerate itself, so I'll just remove enough of the damaged parts so that there are only healthy cells left that will grow back, etc. and operate on patient 6 last. Though you used the word euthanized instead of presumably put on anesthetics, which if he were euthanized, you can ignore everything I said above because he'll be dead anyway.
@lumiimote7 жыл бұрын
Multi-track drifting.
@BillyCrash1007 жыл бұрын
They already said what I came to say :(
@annulrsolformrkelse40237 жыл бұрын
Adam Jackson You'll kill all the 200 passengers
@hjorth33877 жыл бұрын
Even better
@TheWaross7 жыл бұрын
+User Name they choose to be in a shitty trolly that can't stop. They die
@FreakyBo0o7 жыл бұрын
+TheWaross hahahahah
@namtranvan26852 жыл бұрын
If I was in that case, I would closed my eyes and pretend I didn't see anyone, and let the trolley runs its direction.
@think3rofficial4 жыл бұрын
The animator who did this one is AMAZING, great 2D animation and 3D animation!
@escraftTH7 жыл бұрын
In the fat guy situation, I'd jump cus I'm fat.
@ashkhri7 жыл бұрын
lololol
@escraftTH7 жыл бұрын
Kuro Inori And the train would explode and kill everyone onboard.
@PieALaMode7 жыл бұрын
Shit tru. I could die a hero. A fat hero
@TorquemadaTwist7 жыл бұрын
Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light. This could be your response to anyone implying that you should lose weight. Tell them you're bulking up for maximum trolley stoppage. Every hero you eat makes you more of a hero. Superhero name: Trolleystopper
@TheFieryFledgling7 жыл бұрын
Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Oh wait it is just a fat guy jumping xD
@enhydralutra7 жыл бұрын
I never got why so many people were inconsistent with the trolley problem. It comes down to letting 5 people die, or murdering 1 person. We all let people die everyday, but a vast majority of us do not murder others, yet the results of the trolley problem are just the opposite -- most people choose to murder instead of letting people die.
@ShizL7 жыл бұрын
I know, idiots.
@niklashansen54327 жыл бұрын
It´s purposely letting people in our vicinity die though. We don´t do that every day.
@enhydralutra7 жыл бұрын
Niklas Hansen You do, you just don't think about it because it's other people's jobs.
@niklashansen54327 жыл бұрын
Lutra Nereis Inadvertently, yes. Purposely, no.
@ShizL7 жыл бұрын
Niklas Hansen You can't and I'm sure you would not kill a person to think that it is possible to save others. You won't push a man in front of a train wtf.
@Mr.J503 Жыл бұрын
I think there are two other paradoxes ( I Think ) that are like this one as shown in Indian films and also from my experiences. 1. belief/poison paradox :- this one is related to some chefs that make poisonous food to kill their owner. but for this everytime they try to do this, their owner always asks them to eat that food first. So , they always make food that isw not poisoned to impress their owner. But one day, the owner tells them, I believe you so he doesn't ask them to eat. The next day, the owner does the same, but this time, the chefs really make poisonous food. Then he died. Now, even if the chefs do/don't eat/make that poisonous food, it depends on the owner to believe it or not. I think that after you read this you see no paradox, But when I thought deeply about this, I got so many questions and confusions but I could not express what I exactly meant by this or what I had thought that time. 2.trust worthy/responsibility paradox :- Ok, this one is a little different and difficult for you to understand if you are not an Indian ( Sorry, I don't know if you can understand or not, as I thought so deeply to find/search/make this ). So this is about a shopkeeper and a costumer. One day the costumer from a very far place came to this shop on a bicycle to buy vegetables, but he didn't have enough money. As he came from a very far place, and was tired, he doesn't want to waste his work, So he said to the shopkeeper, that he would pay that money some other time. The shopkeeper agreed. But as the costumer got to his home, He was very busy in work/school/home and he forgot about that money matter. And same happened to the shopkeeper, he was very busy in selling and forgot that money matter. Now, where had the trust of the shopkeeper/ responsibility of the costumer gone? This recently happened to me, but I paid the money. As I said earlier, I have not expressed my thoughts completely, but this one is little close. I don't know, if you call these ' paradoxes ' or not, but this was what I understood about paradoxes. There are still some points that I want to express but I would be writing all day and you would be reading all day.
@sarveshyadav016 ай бұрын
About second, if vegetable seller is open minded enough to trust a unknown man, most likely he would understand that other person forgot
@devyanisingh94504 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who got reminded of Eleanor Shellstrop in this same situation in “The Good Place”?
@gettingshotsomeonesgonnapa86354 жыл бұрын
What is good place?
@megelizabeth94924 жыл бұрын
@@gettingshotsomeonesgonnapa8635 The Good Place is a sitcom, where the premise is that Eleanor Shellstrop dies and wakes in up "The Good Place", the show's equivalent of Heaven, where only the best of the best of humanity goes. There's only one problem: Eleanor is not a nice person at all. She's been confused with someone else.
@gettingshotsomeonesgonnapa86354 жыл бұрын
@@megelizabeth9492 thx for the detatiled explanation
@MusicalInquisit5 жыл бұрын
Under the laws of the United States, the railroad company would be the one who gets charged with negligence and involuntary manslaughter. Criminal negligence because the railroad company failed to inform workers about an incoming train; involuntary manslaughter because of criminal negligence.
@lemoncardboard41995 жыл бұрын
gottem
@bait52575 жыл бұрын
Gottem
@president81025 жыл бұрын
gottem
@elysium81315 жыл бұрын
gottem
@elysium81315 жыл бұрын
@@president8102 u first
@christinawong18664 жыл бұрын
THIS MAJORLY REMINDS ME OF THE GOOD PLACE
@immortaltuna4 жыл бұрын
Very much agreed
@Root7m4 жыл бұрын
@Mushaku Just the best show that ever existed
@vedantnipane22682 ай бұрын
TED-Ed videos and the animations >>>>>
@shanggosteen98044 жыл бұрын
The actually answer: why in the world are random people standing at tracks and a worker working when the train is already running Edit: THX SO MUCH FOR THE LIKES!!!
@danieldavid37664 жыл бұрын
Maybe someone hijacked the trolley
@kawaiidere10233 жыл бұрын
They can hop the fence.
@ajuresam81653 жыл бұрын
Your answer is actually in the form of a question :/
@jasasul81643 жыл бұрын
there's a version where the people are actually tied to the rails
@gopikahosangadi98533 жыл бұрын
* confused indian noises *
@rh77325 жыл бұрын
Girls locker room: sacrifice 1 to save 5 the people! Boy locker room: *DISLODGE THE TRACKS AND KILL ALL 6*
@OnceMK5 жыл бұрын
Hydrocarbon You literally copied The Bold Text from the Comment Above,Go play minecraft
@rh77325 жыл бұрын
Mentolly I didn’t steal anything and anyways my one is funnier
@grant.keegan5 жыл бұрын
Please change your profile picture, its almost as bad as mine!
@macaroon_nuggets80085 жыл бұрын
@@OnceMK dont hate on Minecraft it is great. you clearly have never played.
@macaroon_nuggets80085 жыл бұрын
@@rh7732 sexist
@kazooie51527 жыл бұрын
A man heavy enough to stop a train probably wouldn't live very long anyways.
@thedead0737 жыл бұрын
Kazooie That's cold man
@smile-yl2sb7 жыл бұрын
{TGD} hardcorepro but true...
@tnteater19747 жыл бұрын
Diabetes?
@tnteater19747 жыл бұрын
But just saying he would not die when he falls he would make a earthquake derailing the train
@ceTarnity7 жыл бұрын
Kazooie XD
@TheLMBLucas Жыл бұрын
"Don't touch anything" should be the only correct solution in this exact situation with no more information about the people involved
@assarlannerborn9342 Жыл бұрын
Not doing anything is a choice. You would deliberately let 5 people die😊
@TheLMBLucas Жыл бұрын
@@assarlannerborn9342 You don't know what happened or how those people got there, you are just playing God by changing it and killing one person that wasn't in danger and you know nothing about. Whoever put the people on that situation is letting the people die, not me.
@theonlineitalian213soldacc65 жыл бұрын
"Comedy clip" Written on it: *_LMAO_*
@anawesomepet4 жыл бұрын
|_ |\/| /-\ ○
@TheSpyGuy3847 жыл бұрын
Why isn't there a sort of alarm to warn the workers?
@Sasoruy7 жыл бұрын
Roaring Rayquaza get out
@ashkhri7 жыл бұрын
yeah that's cheating; cheaters aren't allowed 😂
@GarketMardener7 жыл бұрын
Nice answer my dude. /s
@alminabajic46847 жыл бұрын
It's not about solving the problem bc there are many ways, it's just about how you would deal with the problem, kill 1 person or 5
@eazye.b.35855 жыл бұрын
Now change that 1 person to being your closest family member, and 5 strangers.
@dopiestthyme33655 жыл бұрын
It's obvious you'll save your sibling over 5 strangers. You can't break that chain of love and care between a family, even if it's selfish to save 1 person and kill 5 other's. Basic human instincts
AI have no relatives. This question only become relevant in the case of programming ethics.
@张桓瑜4 жыл бұрын
The hardest of choices require the strongest of wills
@jekesan42214 жыл бұрын
@@张桓瑜 So you would save 5 strangers over a family with unconditional love?
@ravenwilder4099 Жыл бұрын
I see a key difference between the two versions of the problem. Imagine for a moment that there WASN'T a worker on the second set of tracks. In that scenario, switching the trolley's tracks and saving those five people is the obvious correct decision. So when there IS someone on the second set of tracks, even if you switch the trolley so it runs them over, you're not SETTING OUT to kill them - you're just doing the same thing you would have done even if they weren't there, and simply aren't letting their presence STOP you. But in the bridge version of the problem, the large person's death isn't an unfortunate side-effect of saving the five people's lives - the large person's death is the MEANS you're using to save their lives. You're specifically targeting the large person for death in a way you weren't with the worker in the switch version of the problem.
@beemore187 жыл бұрын
People would get their phones out and start recording!!!
@Shadowschannel17 жыл бұрын
beemore18 XD
@jellybeanjustin827 жыл бұрын
beemore18 *I HAVE TO DO A SACRIFICE AND KILL SOMEONE?!?!?! |STORY TIME| SO TENSE!😰😱😰😱😰😱😰😱😰😱😰😱😰😱😰😱😨😨😨*
@aidandixon60287 жыл бұрын
beemore18 *PUSHING PEOPLE ONTO TRACK GONE WRONG GONE SEXUAL*
@lamegamer46077 жыл бұрын
Omg so truexd
@0766576 жыл бұрын
beemore18 of course they would. What do you excpect them to do? Take action? Would you do something about it? Really?
@whythehelldoineedahandle4 жыл бұрын
“Would you sacrifice one person to save five?” Me: Yes, *me specifically.”*
@larry18163 жыл бұрын
Easier imagined than done man....
@Kearskill3 жыл бұрын
@@larry1816 not if..you are suicidal
@randommax74813 жыл бұрын
I think he meant that he's part of the 5
@TheObeseDuathlete3 жыл бұрын
Depends who earns more ~ capitalism
@taoleyden13317 жыл бұрын
On the original problem, I'd pull the lever twice. Thus being responsible (sort of) for more deaths. Gotta work towards getting that high score.
@ihaventshoweredin7weeksbut7927 жыл бұрын
Tao Leyden was you can only divert once. Have you seen a train track?
@cerysgibby75426 жыл бұрын
That wouldn't work but it is funny
@0766576 жыл бұрын
LolliPoppy Cookie it would work
@stevie82716 жыл бұрын
gotta get a better high score for the media
@tjmueller66536 жыл бұрын
I would switch the when the train in on or a little past the fork
@jabezmengesha83172 жыл бұрын
A life is a life and no amount of number will increase its value. This is because life is so precious and qualitative that it reaches the stage at which no number will increase its value.