Ten Features of the MIRANDA CLASS in STAR TREK

[@GenerationFilms]

Grab AtlasVPN Cyber Month deal for 86% OFF + 3 months for FREE atlasv.pn/GenerationFilms !

[@captainrgd1565]

What about a Starbase?

[@thehillbillygamer2183]

After wolf 359 Starfleet started making new versions of the Miranda and the excelsior class these were completely new versions with Galaxy class level technology but they can make five mirandas for one Galaxy and two excelsior for one Galaxy class maybe even three excelsior and that's why they did this because they needed more ships it was pumping them out fast as they could started making half the first officers of the fleet got commands of new Miranda classes a new versions of the excelsior class and people was like Commander rocker still won't be a captain they tried to offer a rock or one of these new excelsior class or the new Miranda classes like no way man I'm going to stick with Picard I want to be hiding under Picard's apron strings I'm going to hold on to be cards aprons train as long as I came

[@nocillis]

Oh! on the 'roll bar' those aren't just phaser emitters. They are Pulsed Phaser Cannons (PPCs), which are different to the 6 standard phaser beam bank turrets on the rest of the ship.

[@JohnSmith-eo5sp]

2:00 Obviously the USS Reliant was designed primarily as a warship

[@ditzydoo4378]

The Soyuz-class was a survey class. The Four-Turrets (yes four) were actually advance sensor pods. A Fifth grouping was attached to the underside of the saucer section. I too when I first saw the turrets though, "Damn this thing is a Warship". but alas i was doomed to utter disappointment with the canon literature said sensors, not pulse cannons.

[@danedudlicek9241]

10:01 that's actually the stand that comes with an Excelsior model kit from the early 90s used to hold up your model once you're done painting it. I know because I bought that kit and went "OMG its the weird variant pod from that Miranda class we see one time"

[@steelshanks1265]

I'm not a huge Star Trek fan, I'm a Star Wars guy, but I've always loved the Miranda Class, since first seeing it in Star Trek II. It's a great design...

[@valor1omega]

I agree. Fun fact the ship is mostly automated in the TNG era, it is capable if memory serves me to run with less crew than the defiant class ship. Also a fun tidbit about the movie itself, it was the first most realistic combat on screen for fighting in space.

[@Knightfang1]

Paramount’s model department definitely got their money’s worth out of that model when they designed it

[@valor1omega]

@@Knightfang1 The ship was first seen in the old FASA Trek tabletop game. It's funny for a long time i didn't know that FASA put out a Trek game, otherwise I would have been on a lookout for it while buying my battletech FASA game.

[@Knightfang1]

@@valor1omega Star Trek II the Wrath of Khan was Released in 1982. The FASA game was first published in 1983

[@valor1omega]

@@Knightfang1 First edition was 1982 second edition was 1983. And came out before twok. That would explain why he said that he got the idea from FASA.

[@fakshen1973]

As far as I know... the Miranda class was the first canon Starfleet ship on-screen that wasn't Constitution class. As a kid when Wrath of Khan came out, it was so dope to see something different.

[@NotfallsRene]

The second but last one ist a Reliant model with an Excelsior model display glued on top of it. Love it ^^

[@andrewhopkins1010]

I nerded out at the Top Gear clip at the beginning. Top Gear and Star Trek are 2 of my favorite things.

[@Jayjay-qe6um]

The Miranda Class is one of my favorite starships, back then I wish there was a Star Trek show where the Miranda was the main vessel. Its to bad we won't be seeing this type of ship nowadays.

[@xheralt]

The Ares class of the frequently-maligned Axanar fan film fulfills that sort of destiny/tactical role.

[@nicholasmorsovillo2752]

He was mistaken about the U.S.S. Lantree she was a Miranda Class but whas mentioned to be a Class 6 cargo supply ship with Class 3 defensive systems as stated by Lt. Commander Data in the TNG Season 2 episode 'Unnatural Selection'.

[@daverage4729]

10 Features Of The Miranda.. 01: It blows up with little effort. 02: You don't need a coffin if you die on the job as you're already flying in one. 03: It blows up a lot. 04: Its the only Starfleet ships where crew members must have a last will and testament when coming on board. 05: There's barely enough room to swing a cat...which is just as well because should your cat make contact with the ships bulkheads...the ship will blow up. 06: Its the ship that killed Kahn Noonian Singh...despite it being 'his' ship. 07: Should Borg assimilate a Miranda...their cube will be 90% more likely to blow up. 08: Crew members must be in perfect health....since coughing loudly will cause the ship to explode. 09: If you install a couple of nassels, some phasers and life support into a Ford Pinto, you can effectively create your own 'Mini-Miranda'. 10: Mirandas are build from the rare and unstable mineral 'Explodium'.

[@Persian-Immortal]

So you're saying that's a good thing.

[@jamescooper7878]

this list also fits well on the Oberth class XD

[@Normal1855]

This list is too funny.🤣

[@JayJayM57]

I disagree with your list. Miranda are cheap mass producible. This made them individually weaker than all other ships but mass deployable to hold the line or take territory.

[@SecretAgentE]

Hahahahahhahahahhaha

[@JonathonSwinney2814]

British Ben! Welcome back! It's been a minute!

[@GenerationFilms]

It's been 8 days

[@tmseh]

Those phasers on the "rollbar" are not just phasers but mega-phasers. The Star Trek version of the USAF A-10 30mm cannon.

[@miafillene4396]

Not...really. it was just three in one, pointing forward and aft. But that is still hefty firepower. Remember, it was only slightly more powerful then the Enterprise. A Battle cruiser versus a heavy cruiser.

[@tmseh]

@@miafillene4396 Correct! Forward, aft. To the port and starboard also if I remember correctly.

[@miafillene4396]

@@tmseh usually 45 degrees port or starboard. Angle the ship right, and it was near 360 degree capability.

[@ralphc1405]

Pulse-phaser cannons. Reliant is more of a tactical ship. Constitution class is more exploratory ship design.

[@jameslewis2635]

The sad thing about the Miranda class is that after the Wrath of Kahn every appearance has it being far less capable than in the movie. Both the missile pod and the pulse phaser cannons which make it a militarily useful vessel always seem to be deleted. Outside of that movie I can not recall a single retelling of this class that use either these weapon points or pulse phaser cannons at all. Also the hull plates tend to get switched out for pure explodium.

[@valor1omega]

Well in ds9 you can't have it showing up the defiant. Also twok was the first and last realistic space combat seen in trek. Something else to remember, the Miranda is a great test bed and a solid space frame. They could have easily saved resources and time by testing the tech they wasted on the unreliable defiant. If space battles was like what we seen in wraith of Khan the Miranda wouldn't have looked like exploded or whatever that stupid lame loser term is. But everything has to look likeSome dumb SW space combat simulator, ugh.

[@tba113]

At a guess, later eras of the Federation wanted Starfleet to project a friendlier image, so they intentionally pulled the Miranda's teeth by removing the weapon-filled roll bar and told it to act more as a coast guard cutter rather than the military fast-attack vessel it had been originally designed to be.

[@valor1omega]

@@tba113 I always thought it was because of the treaty with the Klingons that caused the Miranda to become underpowered.

[@catoblepasomega]

It really was the 'Defiant' of the WoK era if you think about it. (the similar name to 'Reliant' can't be a coincidence in my mind)

[@valor1omega]

@@catoblepasomega In the FASA table top game of trek which is where the Miranda came from it was the Reliant class

[@ScaryBaldMan]

My favorite ship design ever. Thanks!

[@orionwesley]

I really liked the Saratoga in DS9's premiere. It was in no way grand, but it came across as a very useful starship and sold me on how it was home to Sisko, his family, and many others.

[@joeclerkin2653]

One of my most favorite moments from ‘Top Gear’! Thank you!!!

[@stevenewman1393]

🖖😎👍Very cool and very nicely well done and well executed and informatively explained in every detail way shape and form provided indeed, And I myself have always liked the Miranda class design of starship's and all of her variants and configurations as well, And I myself have a couple of these model kits by Polar lights and AMT Ertle, And I have all of the variants of this ship from Eaglemoss as well as the original concept design of it also,👌.

[@2011Kestrel]

The Miranda class is one of the few Star Trek ships I like. It’s an excellent and (relatively) realistic design. I’ve built two models of this class so far - the USS Reliant (naturally) and a conversion kit that turned the Revell model into the USS Bozeman from the Next Gen episode “Cause and Effect”. Love the ship and all of its variations.

[@tristangates2797]

The B52 Bomber was first flown in 1952, already almost 60 years, but aren't expected to be fully phased out until 2050. Of course the very earliest ones have been retired, but even the current newest ones are only about a decade newer. And this is without 24th century tech to maintain it.

[@rufinator]

I think of the Miranda Class as like the C-130 Hercules… the C-130J vs the original C-130 the only thing in common is the shape… engines avionics mission equipment and such, they may as well be different planes.

[@fluffly3606]

I headcanon that the older Starfleet ships in their latter days were used in combat as basically torpedo trucks that sat back and bombarded the enemy from afar, due to their flimsiness and their weak, slow-firing phaser banks being decidedly inferior in combat compared to modern highly adaptable phaser arrays. I also headcanon for my own suspension of disbelief and freedom of fan creativity that everything we see on screen is a dramatisation and operations in the Star Trek universe are far more nuanced and "realistic." Relevant to this topic would be the idea that Starfleet's combat doctrine emphasises massive torpedo barrages from standoff range and that phasers are primarily for point defence against enemy ordnance. I am weird.

[@nocillis]

Phasers are great for point defence yes, but you'd still need them to weaken enemy shields because you only have a 'limited' supply of torpedoes, and then once they are weakend enough, idealy you would then launch torpedoes for direct damage to hull and Area-of-effect type damage. But yes I agree, Starfleet must have decided at one point that turret based phasers aren't so quick at targeting when compared to the 23rd century phaser arrays, so all ships got the phaser strips (arrays). Who knows, maybe in the 32nd century they have self replicating torpedo launchers so you can go 'ham' on an enemy shields.

[@adamcraig9059]

Like the expanse... i can dig. Id love to see a more hard scifi take on startrek

[@valor1omega]

Thing is the federation built them to last, all old school Trek ships like the Connie and the Miranda was built rugged. The aging space frames of Miranda was still sturdy and with upgrades she could be a match for if not better than the defiant. The decota was an aging ship but with the right upgrades she would have easily destroyed the defiant had they not hold back.

[@Z1gguratVert1go]

@@nocillis The phaser arrays are better because they are a chain of single emitters. Each emitter can generate and fire its own beam or pass the energy onto an adjacent emitter. When one emitter finally fires the beam, it's firing far more power beam than it could ever generate on its own. A prolonged beam could cause overheating, but the point of origin of the beam can "move" along the array, so an emitter can fire until it gets very hot then pass the beam along to the next one which then fires until it's about to overheat, and so on. Also arrays have great combat survivability, since if you hit an enemy ship's array likely you will just create two smaller arrays by cutting a longer array in half, though we've seen single hits take out whole arrays in STTNG so perhaps it can trigger some kind of cascade failure if one emitter is hit while the whole system is charged up. Before you tell me I made this up for head canon purposes, it's in the STTNG Technical Manual. I think older ships probably get upgraded phaser emitters (since they look like orange beams in the 24th Century instead of blue beams or red pulses, so they must have been upgraded at some point) but they do not get upgraded to arrays, at least not that we've ever seen on screen. That's probably because it would be some really extensive work on the hulls to add the needed hardware, and the time and cost would make it prohibitive (cheaper to build new ships that already have them perhaps). I think upgrading torpedoes is likely easier and requires a lot less work. Upgrade the loading and firing mechanisms to fire them faster or to make them compatible with newer torpedo models, and then swap out the inventory of old torpedoes with new ones. That seems like a lot less work than cutting up the hull to install a long chain phaser array (and having to move whatever was under them).

[@nocillis]

@@Z1gguratVert1go HUH? I think you need to go back to your Star Trek Next Generation Technical Manual and RE-read pages 123-126 and 1: Understand the difference between a Phaser Emitter and a Phaser Array since the large Phaser strip on the top and bottom of the Saucer section of the Enterrpise -D has 200 phaser emitters in it alone! (that blew my mind when i read that) B: Especially read the 'pre-firing' and 'Beam Emission' sequence and you'll know why a phaser array gets f^%ked---i mean, is offline if it gets 'cut-in-half'. Tre: The phasers on the Enterprise are Mk X (ten) only have an output of 5.1Megawatts compared to Pulse phasers on the Defiant which are newer AND use of 'neraly flawless' emitter crystals AND use EPS capacitance banks to 'store' / 'compress' the phaser charge and then relases it as a burst ("like an oinion"-STDS9 Technical Manual), thus ensuring little energy loss from emmission to target hit, which make it better against enemy shields. AND of course Enterprise can sustain FULL phaser power beam on an enemy shields for 45minutes from 300,000km away, BUT the battle is not going to last that long because that would blow out Paramount/CBS's SFX budget for the whole year. IV: What are you tring to say? Phaser are better than what? My house? Your fleshlight?--yeah of course but try to make a clear and concise argument other than "it's better" :/ And in conclusion I would like to say that in my reply to Fluffly Boi's comment, I too was just using headcannon about the history and referenced a probably alternative in tactics of starship combat. Now go and eat your vegetables and be a good person. Peace and long Life to you.

[@A407RAC]

Regarding the older vs newer torpedo tubes - don't forget that the Enterprise D could fire spreads of multiple torpedos at once from each single tube!

[@Riceball01]

Not quite at once, it still could only fire one torpedo from each tube at a time, but they could fired so raidply that it could create a spread of torpedoes. Sort like a machine gun, it's one bullet from the barrel at a time but they're coming oout so fast that it seems almost multiple bullets are omcing out at the exact same time.

[@A407RAC]

@@Riceball01 You may be right, but how do you explain those spread shots where it appears like one torpedo is launched, then it breaks out into 3-5? I understand that as being 3-5 being launched simultaneously, and I believe that's what it says on Memory Alpha. It happens at least in one episode I can recall by name - "Booby Trap", TNG S3E6, with the Promellian battle cruiser and the minefield that traps the Ent-D

[@leocallan3691]

Nice!! I cant remember any of the other Trek-channels doing a '10 features of' video for the Miranda class.. excellent👍👍

[@GenerationFilms]

Yeah, its hard to find ten features for this ship, since its such a supporting role ship.

[@valor1omega]

You want a more detailed indepth information for this ship, go look up trekyards. No offense Generation tech but trekyards is a channel devoted to this type of thing.

[@SnakeVenom3000]

I loved the Miranda design but the fact that it has no deflector dish always baffled me.

[@HitodamaKyrie]

Aye. Perhaps the deflector array would be buried in the bow of the ship or something. Star Trek Online has a beta variant that places a deflector on top of the torpedo pod.

[@valor1omega]

@@HitodamaKyrie The Miranda class the deflector was in the front of the ship, at least that's where it was in the FASA game.

[@xheralt]

@@valor1omega The mysterious three circles...they serve the same purpose on the Enterprise, but only when the saucer has separated.

[@jerwin2885]

I wonder the same thing about the other 95% of ships we see Klingon Romulan Ferengi Dominion etc... No visible deflector dishes???

[@jacobfoster9185]

DUDE that original design with the 2 pods on bottom is EPICALLY AWESOME

[@clemsobek1808]

You can see the interior of a Miranda shuttle bay and warp core in the old PC game "DS9: The Fallen". It was the USS Ulysses. Loved this game😍

[@jonathanrivlin6248]

7'19" had to rewind a couple times, right i was seeing things. That flat earth joke! Thanks British Ben, i needed that!

[@ArchMageSC]

The “surf board” on that one variant is actually the display stand for the constitution class model.

[@charlestaylor253]

No. It was the stand for AMT/ERTL's 1992-release U.S.S. Excelsior, only with one of the stand's bases cemented above the other's...

[@timothyhansen6581]

Actually, in Star Trek Online there are two more variants. I don't remember the name of one, but the other is the "Centaur" class. They're not actually variants of the Miranda, but they are categorized as being the same basic type. The Miranda class is actually the very first ship you're given during the Federation tutorial, & when you've cleared the tutorial & gain access to Stardock, you can actually take the Miranda & it's two cousins & mix & match their parts together to make your own version. All three are classified as Light Cruisers, with two forward & one rear weapons emplacements, & their top speed is actually Warp 5.

[@Janoha17]

STO also included the Malachowski Class from Discovery, it's 25th Century Refit the Clarke, and a 25th Century refit of the Miranda called the Reliant Class, while the Mirror Universe now has the Bozeman Class, which has a Nebula/Titan style mission pod. All of them can be kitbashed together, and a common kitbash is a Starfleet Warbird, or an attempt to recreate the California Class from Lower Decks.

[@SkywiseStormwolf]

good video that last model is what they used for the Kobayashi Maru in Sar Trek online. and is referred to as the Kobayashi Maru class.

[@crazyeyez1502]

Jeremy Clarkson's favorite car, the Reliant. 🤣🤣

[@coloradobrad6779]

Your research with never seen before (me anyway) pics is great. Good job 👍.

[@FirstDan2000]

I love the random images in these presentations. The Reliant Robin - great comparison. It was widely known by many Romulans (or just me) that Shinzon didn't know his ship was made by the same company. Yes the Reliant Scimitar - it was an attempt to make a space ship that didn't fall over. Hilarious LOL moment when you showed a flat earth.

[@Anagh1701]

IMO, the galaxy class was indirectly based on constitution class and nebula class on Miranda class. Look at the similarities.

[@dragonsword7370]

Nothing like a seeing a Miranda class saucer that makes you want to kit bash and reengineer the crap out it!

[@valor1omega]

Forgot that it is also mostly automated in the TNG era. It was also used as a test bed for many technologies as well. Trekyards did a more indepth look of this ship a while back. This class would have been better test bed for tech wasted on the defiant class and it doesn't break any line of sight rules like that trash hauler sisko created.

[@thereturningshadow]

Ben, The phasers on the rollbar were actually Phaser CANONS. These canons were considerable more powerful than standard phasers which is why the Enterprise got it's ass kicked when Khan first fired on them. You'll notice when Kirk fired back for the first time and hit the saucer section his phasers just scorched and did minimal damage until it hit the Impulse Crystal. Every place Khan used the Phaser Canons temporary plating had to be welded on to create structural and atmospheric integrity.

[@valor1omega]

Shhh, you trying to steal sisko's thunder who stole the claim of creating the cannons from the Miranda. Lol

[@ralphc1405]

or maybe they are PULSE-PHASER emitters--more powerful than the dual phasers on the saucer section. RELIANT was a tactical ship--that's why the Regula station had a Miranda class at their disposal and protection. Enterprise was more exploratory and less tactical inclined.

[@jayvhoncalma3458]

Miranda Class: *Kaboom?* The entire Star Trek franchise: *Yes Miranda kaboom*

[@valor1omega]

Ah the foolish ds9 fanboys never fails to amaze me. The Miranda was weakened to make the defiant look good, no other reason than that.

[@ScopeGuardPony]

The Soyuz class may have looked like it had a huge laser cannon but in reality it was an advanced sensor array.

[@corywilliams2255]

The underslung cylindrical modules of the cargo variant of the Miranda class most likely harken back to the cargo modules carried by the Ptolemy class cargo ship designed by Franz Joseph in THE STARFLEET TECHNICAL MANUAL from the TOS era.

[@MrMcGear]

I love these videos!

[@katerbilla]

The "mini surfboard" of the Antares class looks like the stand for the USS Excelsior model from AMT/Ertl.

[@EliteValor1003]

The Miranda Class is like the federations version of the Ww2 Sherman tank. So many variants and had served longer than intended.

[@Daedalus-BC308]

The Miranda class is pretty much like the Reliant Robin. When it first came out, it was a neat little thing but as time moved on, it just became a self-propelled coffin.

[@daverage4729]

Perfect description! Lol!

[@valor1omega]

The defiant is a self-propelled coffin as well. All starships can be discribed as flying coffins.

[@lynngreen7978]

I've always felt that the torpedo tubes simply could fire in both directions. The tube is the same length as Enterprise. And the launch ports seem to be a straight line. Load a torp, fire it fore or aft as needed.

[@jamesmcgrath1952]

They don't go strait threw. The forward tubes are closer together tban the rear tubes.

[@TheSuperhomosapien]

8:12 Ironically enough the Wright Brothers airplane probably has better stealth characteristics than the F-22. Modern radar would go right through the wood and fabric. The engine is the only things that may be detected.

[@mouseyclickey]

Nice! Never miss an opportunity to dig on the Oberth class (USS Grissom) for getting blown up all the time

[@valor1omega]

I have sisko's Defiant blown up as my wallpaper. The Oberth is like the US military's scientific research ships, I guess it would be funny if it blew up and killing all those men an women because like the oberth was. Ever built for combat. As far as I am concerned, you guys mocking the oberth is mocking the same type of real world military ships and all the lives that could be lost.

[@theobsidianodor858]

I love how Ben flashed a flat Earth model when discussing speed. I was like, "uh, wait minute," 🤣😂🤣😂.

[@GenerationFilms]

That was our editor, Jason, adding in some extra jokes in the edit

[@theobsidianodor858]

@@GenerationFilms It was a nice touch. You guys seem to favor an ambush style of humor.

[@Samtheman85844]

Great features Miranda Class have.

[@BajaTym]

The swappable bridge module was a 1990’s fan-developed rational to explain the changing designs.

[@TheSpaztasm]

Starfleet Academy and Klingon Academy made me adore this ship. If ur a new or old treky, go check them out. Best Star Trek game to date imo.

[@nerdwatch1017]

I’ve been playing ST fleet command and I like it. What I wish they mad like this is a Stargate fleet command!!! Your factions the Tauri! Jaffa. . Wraith.and maybe Asgard factions!!

[@IEatPrimeSong]

"Starfleet has to make it bubbly and friendly" Prometheus, Excalibur, Vengeance.

[@dreadwing01]

Did you ever do this same kind of video for the USS Vengeance?

[@patrickdusablon2789]

Just a thought on the use of Miranda-class ships during the Dominion War: could they have been ships in the mothball fleet getting evergency refits and brought back into service?

[@nocillis]

It's because of the Soyuz Class starship Turret (Cause & Effect) that inspired Sisko and the engineers that developed the defiant, to go back to using 'pulse' based phasers rather than phaser arrays. However Sisko wanted more punch to the phasers (like he did to Q's face) and thus the engineers came up with the crazy idea of feeding the Pulse phasers, the energy from the warp core instead of the standard generators you'd find on a Galaxy class starship.

[@estevanmontoya9825]

Yes history had lost the records of Lt Reed being the first to due this since Enterprise had yet to be thought of

[@nocillis]

Here here. Let's add that to the official records. It should be known from this day forth of Lt Reed's brilliance and creativity that sowed the seeds of the Pulse Phaser Cannons but due to logistical record keeping methods over time, it dissapeared. Many other ideas for PPC's were similar until the 'cause and effect' event when Starfleet R&D in Tokyo examined the U.S.S. Bosemans library and found the initial designs from Lt Reed, and with what they learnt from the Boseman itself, started to work towards more flawless emitter crystals for the phasers, and with Reeds designs, helped develop the newer generation of PPC's. What do you reckon?

[@icepicjoey]

The source for the Miranda (Avenger class) is the Star fleet technical manual. It was originally designed as a tug. And the containers came out of that book too. Well not a tug, more of the supply ships of the fleet. They were labeled Starfleet transport command. The book was considered canon until gene had a falling out with Franz. Images from the technical manual can be seen on the bridge screens in the movie. I always considered this ship more in a destroyer hybrid category. The mega phasers (type 4 - star base phasers) and the torp pod pushed it into a heavy destroyer/ light cruiser class. Using current Navy shop classes. The tug/ supply ship was redesigned and modified(weaponized) for Wrath of Khan using Franz design as a base.

[@valor1omega]

Actually if you look up the FASA ships that is where the Miranda actually came from. I too own that technical manual as well. The only thing the Reliant class from the FASA Trek game and movie version from the wrath of Khan share with it is the shape.

[@mrscary3105]

Love me some Top Gear clips!

[@SirEpifire]

Honestly, I'd love to see a total change of pace in Trek. A film featuring a crew during war time, manning a dated A-class Miranda variant to battle against the odds. It's pure fan service in my mind but considering how much 80's nostalgia trips the media keeps going on, I'd really like to think it would be successful. Especially if it actually cared about the lore, fanbase and just went back to the roots of good old Trek. There's something about a brawler/underdog of a vessel that just screams badass, and I've always wanted to see the Miranda class return to the screen for some redemption.

[@rafaelnunes1039]

I Love Miranda Class and Nebula Class.

[@That80sGuy1972]

The Miranda Class is basically any saucer section of a "real" Federation starship with two nacelles strapped under its sides. It's the sacrificial pawn ship of the Federation. And to call it a "medium cruiser" is to exaggerate its role. It's a frigate at best. Still better on the front lines than the Oberth... and I really love the Oberth for non-power reasons.

[@nicholasmorsovillo2752]

Yeah that's true but I saw a Spacedock video on the Miranda Class Starship and it said the class was beginning to be phased out in favor of newer ships like the Saber,Norway,Steamrunner and Sovereign Class Starships that were built as purpose built warships and during some of the battles of DS9 a large number of the Federation starships that were being destroyed by the Dominion sadly were Miranda Class Starships because they were in service for over a century upto that point.

[@toomanyaccounts]

the Mirandas were largely automated and starfleet was desperate for ships. so the salvage yards full of Mirandas were scrounged for any hull that could be used

[@adamcraig9059]

Not a trek super fan but I have watched quite a bit of most series and I really like the underslung engines. Looks a bit like a space catamaran

[@spacecitizen6756]

You’re my favourite you have the right energy.

[@nicholasmorsovillo2752]

In other words Starfleet Headquarters was turning the Miranda class Starships into cannon fodder in other words ships that were expendable.

[@ivanfreely6366]

Not necessarily expendable. It's more about a numbers game; having more assets in the battle space than your opponent. If you lost a Constitution-class ship then you just lost about 200+ trained crew members as opposed to 20+ service members. So with 200 sailors, you can have approximately 10 Miranda's.

[@Horrox101]

totally missed a trick with the Atlas VPN ad in this episode. Should have definitely made reference to the time in Wrath of Khan when the Enterprise remotely disabled the Reliants sheilds

[@buidseach]

The Turret on the Soyuz Class is just a sensor pod :)

[@ScrybeSG]

A Miranda-Class (probably) was also spotted floating above the junkyard, probably as scrap, on the planet Hunhau in the 32nd century on Star Trek: Discovery. Apparently, Starfleet just felt they produced a few classes of ship in the 23rd century that were seen as easy and cheap workhorses. The Miranda-Class was so successful in this sense, that one survived (sort of) hundreds of years. :D

[@valor1omega]

STD is trash and should be ignored. Even everyone at generation tech hates STD, lol.

[@stephanb2006]

I think on that second to last Miranda Class variant, The Antares class I think, I’m pretty sure that’s the stand for the original AMT Excelsior model.

[@ivanfreely6366]

Crew complement is listed as 26-35 (24th Century), not 220 (according to Memory Alpha).

[@jclay6680]

If I'm not mistaken the Miranda Class was actually made upside down.

[@GenerationFilms]

Yep, thats in there

[@charlestaylor253]

I've loved the Miranda class since age 13 in 1982. However, using a basically unmodified and inverted 1/1000 AMT USS Excelsior kit's stand, (and two of the stand's triangular bases cemented together), to create the 'Antares class' AWACS/SWACS variant on an otherwise-unmodified AMT 1/500 USS Reliant kit in DS9 was a pretty damn low-budget example of kit-bashing...😞

[@draconus56]

Could you compare real navy ship vs trek ships for size and design. Would a zumwalt destroyer compare to a intrepid class ship?

[@nocillis]

The Zumwalt is 190 meters in length, while Voyager is 345 meters long

[@Eulemunin]

More Star Trek please.

[@martyburgess341]

Miranda class ships are very similar to Nebular class(which is my favourite class of ship)

[@valor1omega]

Got that backwards. The nebula came out long after the Miranda class was out.

[@ivanfreely6366]

@@valor1omega OP never said the Miranda-class was based on the Nebula-class. Marty only stated that it's similar in design.

[@ivanfreely6366]

Agreed. The Nebula-class is the best looking Federation ship out there; followed by the NX-class then Defiant-class.

[@ridinlow01]

Do a nebula class video

[@uncaboat2399]

good heavens, the commercials are in the preview!!

[@JDGourley]

So, what are the most disposable (destroyed) class in star trek?

[@valor1omega]

The defiant?

[@lonster3000]

My question about the Miranda class has been where is its deflector dish? If it has one where is it, if not why not?

[@davidblalock9945]

Would have made more sense of they said the Miranda class was a patrol and enforcement frigate used by Star Fleet in a “coast guard” type role.

[@toomanyaccounts]

that was one of the functions and why there was a ton of them. they were easy to mass produce

[@dylanthomas385]

Do more strength and weakness videos do a condon on most dangerous startec races

[@BammerD]

LOL @ the Top Gear clip.

[@Ecki_Meerschweinchen]

You forgot the Nebula class from one of Voyager's episodes

[@Firefox13A]

The Deep Space Nine technical manual botched all Starship dimensions. It is a singular work of non-canonical fiction that should not be referenced, yet it is continuously. Good video. I agree, Tempest-Class is a way better name.

[@valor1omega]

Everything about ds9 was crap not just the manual. Well save for ROM, Nog, Quirk, an Morn. I also disagree about the name. Miranda is a far better name than the awful tempest class. I got it from this point on the oberth is now the tempest class.

[@marcusbah]

The U.S.S Reliant was not a Miranda Class Ship. It was an Avenger Class Ship. The Miranda's were light cruisers, whereas the Avenger's were heavy frigates. They may have similar designs, however the Reliant is an Avenger Class.

[@curious5887]

The most British man i ever see on KZbin is British Ben

[@GenerationFilms]

I really think that isn’t true, I live in the US, when I go back to the UK they think I’m Australian lol

[@geraldford6409]

Ahh yes, the MIranda. The 24th Century Sherman Tank of the Federation

[@toomanyaccounts]

Sherman tanks wound killing a lot of german tanks at the end of the day

[@davidpickens8800]

@@toomanyaccounts at 5 to 1 odds

[@toomanyaccounts]

@@davidpickens8800 german tanks were expensive to construct and broke down a lot often having to be abandoned because they couldn't be recovered.

[@kholdanstaalstorm6881]

Always great videos and research done on this and the other Generation channel, but both channels often cut of the hosts goodbyes. It's a small nitpick of mine, but it's also such a easy fix that I'll bring it up. I don't think you'll crash your channels with adding that last second to the videos. You all deliver the presentation with a certain quality that this little nitpick seems to be disrespectful to the host and audience. Other than that, great video and keep up the good work!

[@johnbockelie3899]

The Red shirt ship of Starfleet.

[@timothynoall7493]

The thing I always wondered is where's the navigational deflector....

[@kwaktak]

That last variant looks like a mockup for the Kobiyashi Maru

[@DanBen07]

No it was not the guy who made it as stated it was not & said it was a different cargo variant.

[@karlrichardson3295]

In my opinion it is more like taking a Grate War protected cruiser retro fit against a Second world war Destroyer. It may give a fight but not win. A quick question. Why do you not say English Ben?

[@adamanderson9433]

Where’s the deflector dish on the Miranda class?

[@GenerationFilms]

It had one of those, um, cloaked deflector dishes…

[@valor1omega]

@@GenerationFilms It's hidden in the front of the saucer according to trekyards.

[@HitodamaKyrie]

8:10 People like making this sort of time comparison but it doesn't really apply that way. A plane from 1903 and a modern fighter jet share little in common aside from being aircraft. The Miranda uses the same sort of engines, weapons, and defenses as the more modern ships use.

[@toomanyaccounts]

the Miranda was refitted and used a lot less crew in the 24th then in the 23rd

[@timothybrandriff6499]

The Miranda class wasn't named after Prospero's daughter. It was named after Miranda Rights laws, afforded to arrested individuals in the United States

[@3Rayfire]

Damn I'm in early, fantastic.

[@jeffjones4654]

Regarding the name: I would think it's more likely that the class is named after the Uranian moon Miranda.

[@nagash303]

features of miranda class you made me laugh before i clicked the video.

[@michaelaldredge-greenwell1692]

The Miranda Class “Torpedo Roll-Bar” is a freaking HUGE target on the ship, just because of the totally unprotected said torpedo launch system, as well as the warp nacelles that stretched out all along the length of the ship. It’s like the stupid design team came up with this hilarious variant that just screams: “Hit me!! I’m an easy target!! Hey, Klingons & Romulans!! Look!! We’re driving a Pinto!! Hit us!! Please!! Put us out of our misery!! We never should’ve signed on to be on this DEATH-TRAP!!” I could’ve designed a much better ship than the designers could. No wonder they weren’t paid enough…

[@Necron-ez2cc]

The Miranda Class is a much more sensible design.

[@jamiebraswell5520]

Just keep in mind that the Excelsior was the great experiment and debuted at a time when Reliant and others of that class had been in operation for, probably ten years or so. I say that because Miranda Class was probably developed around the time of The Motion Picture, if not before. The Excelsior was a huge leap forward in technology, as well as being enormous when compared to other starships. So really, it is not fair to use Excelsior as a comparison to the Reliant in this video. The only comparison that should be used is the Constitution Class. Where did the name "Miranda Class" even come from? It was years after Star Trek II before I had ever heard it. Also, why on Earth was Reliant so heavily armed? It had way more weapon emitters than Enterprise.

[@Krypton853]

The Miranda Class Is like the Kenny of Star Trek.