This video made me so happy. His greatness is often undermined due to recency bias. He was never the same after 2017 because of potentially career-ending injuries; but before that... People forget that between 2010-2017 it was never just the Big 3, but rather the Big 4... He competed in the strongest era of men's tennis next to the greatest 3 male players ever, and managed to win 3 Slams, 14 Masters, and 2 Olympic Golds, and 46 titles. Sir Andy Murray, ladies and gentlemen, may we never forget how great he once was ❤
@ToiletTennis3 ай бұрын
46 titles is insane
@xav92583 ай бұрын
Fantasy. It was NEVER a big four. He kept getting stuffed in Grand Slam finals!!!
@mertkalender13063 ай бұрын
@@xav9258 yet he always kept getting to Grand Slam finals. Unlike other great players in his era, such as Ferrer, Tsonga, Berdych and del Potro. Also became the world no 1 for 40+ weeks while all members of Big3 were actively playing. No one claims he is better than them, but it's obvious he was at par with them during a point in his career.
@oragamiowl50313 ай бұрын
Thank you! It was a big four up until 2017. Murray was winning everything, still getting to finals, was number one in the world and at the top of his game before that hip took it all away. He wasn’t an also ran, he was a contender. You don’t win 46 titles just by being ordinary.
@Ssagar3043 ай бұрын
It was never a big four because he was never really a threat as a slam contender
@falsettogod58533 ай бұрын
I don’t know why it’s so hard for people to put respeck on his name. World class talent and world class guy
@BrotherTree13 ай бұрын
Peak Murray was unreal. He was definitely up there with the level of the big 3.
@joshjones50623 ай бұрын
Surprised they missed out the Tokyo 2011 final that 3 set 6.0 against Nadal who only won 4 points in the whole set. I would have picked 2016 Apt finals over the clay one given the significance
@hiteshsharma11323 ай бұрын
No he wasn't lol
@sleepyjoe92673 ай бұрын
@@joshjones5062 2016 ATP finals was Novak just phoning it in. He tanked that match and couldn't care less, likely he was paid off by the ATP/Murray's team as well. They picked well to pick Rome 2016.
@sleepyjoe92673 ай бұрын
At the slams he really wasn’t. He had to rely on injuries and exhaustion on Novak’s part and Federer choking to win his slams.
@andrewwright41953 ай бұрын
@sleepyjoe9267 you take advantage can't cry about it he worked very hard
@docteurgillesalewina56693 ай бұрын
That Rome championship point will forever be the most spectacular.
@janeconnors18072 ай бұрын
Throughout his career he's done himself proud and he's done us proud too. Wishing him the happiest of retirements.
@nolegoat46033 ай бұрын
4th best player of the last 20 years
@Ruzzel12343 ай бұрын
That’s an achievement
@kingcuckoo3 ай бұрын
alcaraz
@gaskellr443 ай бұрын
@@kingcuckoo No where near in last 20 years.
@GlasgowCeltic88673 ай бұрын
@@kingcuckoowank
@gaskellr443 ай бұрын
@@GlasgowCeltic8867 Your hobby is your own business.
@calebp61143 ай бұрын
He beat Federer 11 times, Nadal 7 times, and Djokovic 11 times, great stuff.
@shannarattan89633 ай бұрын
👀👀👀👀👀👌👌👌👌
@goldwolf06063 ай бұрын
Meaning GOATdal was the best…
@hurlbut20053 ай бұрын
I do think, similar to Roger, Nadal got in Murray’s head for a long time. And Nadal’s forehand was the only shot that could consistently break down Murray’s backhand, in a way it didn’t with Novak’s. Murray still has many incredible wins over him though.
@paolopecorelli85163 ай бұрын
@@goldwolf0606 maybe you mean CLAYdal😂
@DarrenLucas-up6ki3 ай бұрын
@@goldwolf0606dude Murray played Novak more and it’s still 25 to 11
@mrpog56203 ай бұрын
Gonna miss him for sure 😥
@kevinbilly22493 ай бұрын
Yeahh 😢
@cd97593 ай бұрын
People forget how good Andy was. From 2011-2017 it was the big 4. While maybe Andy wasnt as good as the other 3 as consistently, he was miles ahead of all the other players and alot of the time was on par with the top 3
@sleepyjoe92673 ай бұрын
After 2013 however, Wawrinka was basically just as good as him as far as being a contender for big titles. And a bigger threat to the Big 3 at slams. Murray was always a big threat to the big 3 at the Masters 1000s since 2007 though.
@thomasnorton-crossman21603 ай бұрын
@@sleepyjoe9267 Not really. Murray won the same number of slams, got World No.1, and the ATP Finals Title. Even Wawrinka says it isn;t close.
@sleepyjoe92673 ай бұрын
@@thomasnorton-crossman2160 yes really. Murray is somewhat overrated. Wawrinka has more legendary wins and more feared by the Big 3.
@suryansdash58303 ай бұрын
@@sleepyjoe9267 murray has 14 masters compared to wawrinkas 1, has been world no 1 and won atp finals which wawrinka didnt. So yeah, murray is much better.
@sleepyjoe92673 ай бұрын
@@suryansdash5830 Wawrinka has better slam victories. Nobody remembers Masters (which I agree is unfair, but true).
@VantagePointrocks3 ай бұрын
The things you can do with two hips ... fun times.
@jonathangreenwood59723 ай бұрын
If it wasn’t for injury he’d won a lot more slams,nbr1 for a year and competing and regular beating big 3,great player loved watching him
@wakaflockaproject3 ай бұрын
Yup he was in the form of his life in 2016
@charliehmi763 ай бұрын
@@wakaflockaprojectThe Olympics final against Del Potro was something else
@wookey19952 ай бұрын
I can't get over that return on around 12:55. He was deserved world no.1 in 2016!!
@danielmacdonald92873 ай бұрын
Prime Andy was a monster. He'd wipe the floor with most of the current crop of top players at his best.
@vanditkhanna74773 ай бұрын
For every sore hater - He is the only player that made a dent when the other 3 were at their peak. 3 slams, 2 Olympic Gold in Singles, 14 masters, 1 Nitto Finals, and ended a year #1. 46 Titles, and This is while everyone was playing. Oh and 11 Grandslam Finals. It’s Sir Andy to You !
@calebp61143 ай бұрын
I only just found out that he won an Olympic Silver Medal as well :0
@masters.10003 ай бұрын
So did Tsonga or Del Potro, no one ever said they were one of the greatest.
@Saitama-sense03 ай бұрын
@@masters.1000tsonga won 2 masters title and reached 1 g.s final. Del Potro achieved more than tsonga. He reached 2 slam finals and won 1, reached to world no.3 and won 1-2 masters titles. So yeah Sir Andy did way more than anyone in their time did against federer, nadal and djokovic and he deserves to be called one of the greatest to hold the racquet. 🙏
@xav92583 ай бұрын
No he isn't; Stan won three slams beating two of the Big Three in Grand Slam finals. Murray kept getting stuffed in Grand Slam finals, like a prize turkey!!! The Olympics does not mean a lot in tennis history and only the final is over five sets.
@oragamiowl50313 ай бұрын
@@xav9258Stan might have 3 slams but he only has 16 titles total. Murray has 3 slams, 46 titles total including 2 gold medals, a year end title and pretty much single handedly won the Davis Cup for GB. Plus he spent like 41 weeks at no 1. I like Stan but they’re not comparable. Not at all. Also anyone who says Olympics don’t matter is a clown. They do matter to the players, just ask Djokovic how much one would mean to him, or Federer who never won a singles gold. Stop being so bitter.
@whiteshadow66013 ай бұрын
Peak Murray was soooo good. Better than Warwrinka no question about it
@mariodoblado6683 ай бұрын
Gotta appreciate Murray's return positioning coming forward instead of serving from home like most players do nowadays
@AtaídeEstaneslauEstaneslau3 ай бұрын
A Wonderful player. On This 3 time´s, He finally get all the best of his potencial
@tasaneewantanakul83823 ай бұрын
Andy he's one of the best player in history !! And we call federer, djokovic, nadal, Murray " THE BIG 4"👏👏👏👏
@dinkydoodle83253 ай бұрын
idk if murray is the same caliber as the big 3 but def right behind them
@xav92583 ай бұрын
More fantasy; it was NEVER a Big Four. Ridiculous British bias.
@BrotherTree13 ай бұрын
Dimitrov: ".... and Andy, and Andy... *wink*"
@Smileater3 ай бұрын
Nice selection of matches, Andy won the last two by breaking Federer and Djokovic serve, which is amazing. He broke Nadal on clay more than thrice and those DROPSHOTS! (Andy’s favorite shot) are marvelous. You can see where Alcaraz and Sinner learned them from in order to beat Djokovic and top 10 players now. Sir Andy Murray, a legend of its own.
@robertmacmurray14142 ай бұрын
2016 the man was on fire 🔥 if the hip injury never happened the following year I honestly believe he would’ve won another 4-5 slams 😉👍🏻 Scotland’s finest 🏴
At this point in time, it was clearly a Big 4. Murry's injuries really stared to become unmanageable after be became World Number 1. He was Number 1 for almost a calendar year with the "Big 3" chasing him.
@Smileater3 ай бұрын
To start the video with a MADRID WIN over Nadal, is CRAZY! Nadal holds one of the craziest records there. People don’t undeserving how good Murray was before his hip surgery.
@flanderstruck37513 ай бұрын
Any top 30 player could have beaten that version of Nadal. He barely hit any ball past the service line
@Smileater3 ай бұрын
@@flanderstruck3751 funny
@Smileater3 ай бұрын
@@flanderstruck3751 Nadal prime was amongst those years. He was having one of the highest ELO ratings
@ashleythomas41123 ай бұрын
@@Smileater 2015 is literally the worst year of his career lol, the total opposite of his prime.
@sdstewart873 ай бұрын
It was a big 4. No doubt about it. His records alone say that. World No.1 amongst those three, and doing it by winning so much earned that spot
@masters.10003 ай бұрын
There never was.
@sdstewart873 ай бұрын
@@masters.1000 always was. Don't be an idiot
@masters.10003 ай бұрын
@@sdstewart87 For the press and the idiots like you only. 3 Grand Slams vs 20+ says it all.
@Smileater3 ай бұрын
@@sdstewart87 There was. Stats do the lie. Ignorant tennis fans deny the factual truth: Federer and Nadal and Djokovic were in their respective peaks and Andy Murray was able to beat them MANY TIMES and in crucial matches. Just take a look at Fed-Nad-Djo ELO ratings at that time, Andy was able to beat them all in different occasions.
@xav92583 ай бұрын
Maybe the worst world number one in Open Tennis history. And just three slams. Big Four is a complete fantasy. It's like saying Bojo always told the truth😛😛😛
@Smileater3 ай бұрын
5:54 This point reminds me of Jannik Sinner. It seems Sinner learned a thing or two (or more) from Murray. Andy’s IQ in these rallies is top notch. Definitely the BIG 4 is a fact.
@thunderbolt3387Ай бұрын
I like the movement of Murray's left arm when he serves.
@meetommy34853 ай бұрын
Andy was so fast back then
@thomasf88713 ай бұрын
We will miss him
@papabear1uk2 ай бұрын
Beating Nadal is hard. Beating him on clay (easily Nadal's favoured surface), having dropped just 5 games over 2 (straight) sets is insane
@anneperry90143 ай бұрын
Wonderful stuff, wonderful guy!!❤❤
@leo1314ok2 ай бұрын
And this is the Andy Murray people forget. Such a great player, not only winning grand slams, but easily sitting with and beating some of the greatest players of all time
@JoeChief_2 ай бұрын
That point at 14:17 against djokovic was absolutely ridiculous, Murray back in his day was an absolute beast!
@momonso08213 ай бұрын
The last point is insane😱
@NicholasSarsby2 ай бұрын
If it wasnt for the big 3, he would have won more slams easily. The fact he won 3, two wimbledons, 1 US open was a hell of an achievement with the big 3 all in their peak eras
@r4y331Ай бұрын
He battled injuries his whole career yet achieved so much, to imagine where Murray could've been injury free, he'd definitely have 10 or more slams.
@michaelgustin53763 ай бұрын
Awww ty I got my Murray fix for the day... wat a tennis IQ
@ToiletTennis3 ай бұрын
The greatest mortal to ever play tennis
@xav92583 ай бұрын
Your name is apt, as that's where this ridiculous comment belongs😊
@leewoodard58712 ай бұрын
No one else got anywhere near going with these guys week in week out. Stan did at the Slams three times, but every week he wasnt close. There is a reason the three of them recognise Andy as the 4th...I can't wait for the global legends tour when Novak quits and they play sell out exhibition matches..
@nicozuki3 ай бұрын
Un talento innato
@rossco_p87132 ай бұрын
That has to be one of the most incredible championship winning points of all time (2016 Rome Masters Final). 99.9% of players are not winning that point for the title.
@LeonMcElhinney-bz9lj2 ай бұрын
If that hip had not give way. He would have def had 3 or more grand slams. That period where he became number 1 in the world, he was at least in that moment better than the big 3. Must be so disappointing for him knowing what could have been.
@elainelight2 ай бұрын
interesting that it was Nadal and Djokovic who were the most gracious in defeat in those clips!
@Luna-yg5is3 ай бұрын
マレーはすごかったんだなあ
@angusmcdonald8922 ай бұрын
How great are Nadal, Federer and Djokovic. Here, all 3 aren`t just beaten they are destroyed.
@الخالالشايب-ر5ذ3 ай бұрын
Damn and he did it in finals murry is beast
@mf1033 ай бұрын
Such a great player. Finally reached his potential just as the hip gave way. What could have been.
@gwynjames3 ай бұрын
When you’re put him in the band of the big four,and he regular beat the other three and become world number 1 ,you are in the highest bracket of men’s tennis 🎾 and you as the individual will always have that no matter what,Andy Murray the boy from dunblane,did well oh yes of course the knighthood,who else will achieve that I wonder
@TheTenisian3 ай бұрын
The point at 1:49 illustrates the way the Big Three used to play against Murray: diagonal forehand tennis to prevent his smooth backhand
@ssrmy17822 ай бұрын
The peak was beating prime Djokovic in straight sets in the Wimbledon Final.
@wilf182 ай бұрын
Murray was better than Federer early in the h2h. He lead 6-2 at one stage, then 8-5. He leads Federer 8-7 on hardcourt. He was one of the best harcourt players of his generation. It took Federer till late on to catch him and even up the h2h. Even at the end fed only leads 14-11.
@alanadair48932 ай бұрын
He seems to have helped uk tennis more than Wimbers
@nesan_kaikolar3 ай бұрын
Big four ❤
@xav92583 ай бұрын
Yeah, with his three slams. What a joke!
@matthewwilliams37892 ай бұрын
It was definitely a big 4. He was the best player in the world in 2016, world no1 and his body failed him. If you could build the perfect player from the top 4 you take Murray's backhand.
@montanatony2543 ай бұрын
He is Big 4.
@OnramRiftz3 ай бұрын
Most importantly, he was able to beat them all on their favorite surface while they were at least close to their prime. For me, Murray was like "Djokovic light". He played an at least similar game, but he was not quite as good in most aspects. Nevertheless, great personality, great career and fun to watch.
@robbie51813 ай бұрын
Although djok is more successful thats a reductive summary. Murray hits far more shots and winners on the run than djok did for example, and his determination was more within points rather than over a game in terms of management, producing different styles to novak on clutch points. I don't think Murray controlled game like djokovic did, and thats not form intelligence but because fundamentally I think they approach players and matches differently. I think murrays cross court in general is a little preferred and id argue more varied than novak on forehand in particular, both very strong backhands. I think novak also tends to be happy to strike with the optimum timing, often keeping the ball central in early build up, whereas murray again I feel tend to go wide immediately or early, betting he can cover a return with pace.
@OnramRiftz3 ай бұрын
@@robbie5181 I agree with everything you said and that is the reason why I phrased it "at least similar". Nevertheless, even Murray himself said in many interviews that Novak's and his game is very similar.
@joshjones50623 ай бұрын
Murray for me was better than Novak on grass.
@outofthesinkingАй бұрын
Those that say Andy Murray shouldn't be named in "the big 4" don't really understand Tennis. Andy might not have as many Grand Slam titles, but he was in a lot of finals, won numerous titles in his career, pushed the other three to be their very best.
@za78503 ай бұрын
Great reflexes from James Spader @11:05
@TheOrbofTime3 ай бұрын
Young Murray was so embarrassed to beat Federer for so long, he clearly found him intimidating, understandably!
@paksu97623 ай бұрын
I most like if editor put Murray vs Djokovic ATP FINAL 2016. More thriller & epic
@TheWatch2024OO2 ай бұрын
What would Andy have won and the others not had he not had serious prolonged injury problems?!
@peter424662 ай бұрын
There was something about Murray that when he was playing at his best he just made everyone else look pathetic
@knox81132 ай бұрын
That Rolex Masters trophy 😂😂
@mattjagar63243 ай бұрын
And the fact his career was cut short while the big three had another 5+ years each tells a lot aswell.
@xav92583 ай бұрын
He was already well past his prime when he got injured. His tenure as world number one was probably the worst in Open Tennis history.
@rsoc12343 ай бұрын
@@xav9258 potentially the worst tennis take I have heard in my life
@mattjagar63243 ай бұрын
@@xav9258 what is bro waffling about
@HoangTruong-vk7ekАй бұрын
Given how much prime Alcaraz and Sinner struggle against a 37yo Djokovic, prime Murray would have been an easy world number 1 if he played in today's era. At his prime he was toe to toe with prime big 3. Current crop of players are lucky they only had to play dwindled versions of the real goats. Murray didn't have that luxury. He EARNED every single win against them.
@trenerpotennisu3 ай бұрын
The hardest opponent for prime Big3 because hi in a Big4!!!
@xav92583 ай бұрын
Then why did Djoko wipe the floor with him in so many Aussie Open finals?
@fransanchez76583 ай бұрын
@@xav9258 Why are you so mad you're replying to every positive comment about Andy??
@adityaacharya17993 ай бұрын
I wish he was not injured this much
@knox81132 ай бұрын
If Murray just played more aggressively, he could often really push counter punchers like Djokovic and Nadal around.
@Raymorton-y5u3 ай бұрын
What a legend. The only player to defeat novak so easily a couple of times. Roger, Novak, Rafa, Andy are the greatest players (of the last 20 years) in that order
@AnkitMalviya-l1g3 ай бұрын
sorry man but it's 1. Novak 2. rafa 3. roger 4. andy
@xav92583 ай бұрын
Humbug!
@slowdownmovies44742 ай бұрын
5:31 holy fckn sht that match..
@The_Bashar3 ай бұрын
That Rome final looked & felt like hard court tennis. The Shanghai final had really pacy points. Is it just me or does clay court tennis feel faster, these days?
@Goldtaker233 ай бұрын
He would have won more trophies including Wimbledon if not for injuries so sad
@trudyholmm75513 ай бұрын
I never understood why before ivan lendell came in he never played aggressively .
@camiloandujar414425 күн бұрын
Big four
@simonmcpartlin65472 ай бұрын
Unfortunately he fell short at the final hurdle against Djokovic and Federer. 10 grand slam finals v them but only 2 won. He could otherwise have been a real great.
@mattalexander70772 ай бұрын
He could play a bit 😁
@ToiletTennis3 ай бұрын
muryGOAT
@marklivechannel3 ай бұрын
Великий Энди
@MA-rq6ie3 ай бұрын
This version of Nadal was trash but the other 2 were playing amazing and he destroyed both of them. Probably would have had around 12-15 GS titles in another era
@xav92583 ай бұрын
Not with his really POOR attitude and mentality. All of his crazed mumbling rants...
@tennisaddict20243 ай бұрын
Prime Andy just hit different ❤
@SenseiDenaxАй бұрын
Big 1 vs Big 3
@Oxamyt31093 ай бұрын
I don't know how Nadal got to the final (Madrid-2015) with that game
@shannarattan89633 ай бұрын
Andy Murray ❤❤❤❤
@jimbean75233 ай бұрын
When Murray misses a shot he does that pathetic limp every time
@CM-uh1nz2 ай бұрын
Now show us all the times the real top 3 have dominated the sweaty jock 😂
@PeterPeach213 ай бұрын
And the most salty handshake at the net goes to Federer 😂
@stylishd24293 ай бұрын
Top 3 now alcaraz, sinner & ….?
@shahedulislam943 ай бұрын
I'd put Zverev there
@bluekirbyrocks3 ай бұрын
Rune and/or Fonseca if they sharpen up their game game a bit.
@الخالالشايب-ر5ذ3 ай бұрын
I realy dont like anyone at this time there isnt anyone that can make me stand up for him there was to many in the last 20 years but now its like kids playing the top
@samcox81823 ай бұрын
Zverev
@zaneclone2 ай бұрын
Who dreamed up the ball girls outfits in Madrid !!??
@simonsmith72512 ай бұрын
Andy retired recently and who was there to wish him well: Novak Who chose not to attend : the bitter and twisted Feds and Rafa.....
@Cliff5892 ай бұрын
if not for his hip he would have won more slams he was world no1 before the injury.
@erxishang613 ай бұрын
Murray is a bigger 1st serving, weaker forehand and less flexible at hips djokovic :) Imagine what he could've done if he used forehand better and didnt get hip replacement
@marcelocardozo55083 ай бұрын
Andy Murray is worse in almost every stat, including number of aces and first serve percentage
@Bigobe2443 ай бұрын
2012/13 is peak murray in terms of performance
@flash-uj6ly3 ай бұрын
The big 4 era has come to an end. Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray.
@7th.trumpet2 ай бұрын
His most successful career move, was playing Peter Parker, in 'The Amazing Spiderman' in 2012 2014.
@mecanzie27413 ай бұрын
The fact that he beat Nadal on clay is damn impressive
@marcelocardozo55083 ай бұрын
His win against Djokovic in 2016 is more impressive, Nadal in 2015 was very beatable
@Majorkip2 ай бұрын
Hes the reason federer chokivic and nadal will never have gold medals in singles tennis
@keihnungm2011Ай бұрын
well djokovic has one now
@xav92583 ай бұрын
What about all the times they DESTROYED him...Like Djoko, in about four Aussie Open finals😛😊😛
@stevenperrin60102 ай бұрын
He couldn’t beat an egg
@keihnungm2011Ай бұрын
hi, andy murray here. you're right
@flanderstruck37513 ай бұрын
Any top 20 would've beaten Nadal if he was playing as he did in the first clip honestly. Barely any ball past the service line
@spongebobby1883 ай бұрын
Are you going to show how many times Murray was beaten by each of the top three? 🤦🏼♂️
@seanmccarthy47812 ай бұрын
You will be missed great entertainment on court enjoy your retirement