Testing FSR 3.1 on a GTX 1060 and RX 5500 XT

[@Flameboi900]

FSR 3.1 is literally a savior in a world where new gpus are to expensive. I surely hope amd adds it to as many games as possible it made my friends gtx 960 go from unplayable in starfield to a stable 30 fps it’s crazy how much it does

[@shortshins]

I'm pretty sure fsr 3.1 is open source so it's all down to whether the developers can be bothered to implement it.

[@adi6293]

Can't he just get a Series S? 😅😅

[@pwnomega4562]

​@@adi6293 why would they get a console when they have a PC?

[@williehrmann]

But really there is no real excuse to not at least upgrade to a 2060 or 3050 vor 100$ unless you live in Nigeria or India and make 2$ a day or something. Why would you ever run a 960 in 2024 besides of nostalgia builds for old games of that era.

[@pwnomega4562]

@@williehrmann you should also keep in mind graphics cards prices vary from country to country as well. For many countries, especially poorer countries graphics cards can be even more expensive than what we see in the west or parts of Asia were processing chip flow like water. For example where you can find a 2080 for 300ish bucks a person in Brazil will be looking at like 600 bucks for the same card. Even cards in Europe are noticeably more expensive than the same one that can be found in the US for example. It all depends.

[@jorge69696]

Frame generation uses vram so it's likely the 1060 ran out of vram because it only has 6gb while the 5500xt has 8gb.

[@christophermullins7163]

No you didn't...

[@yasirrakhurrafat1142]

​@@christophermullins7163 what?

[@christophermullins7163]

@@yasirrakhurrafat1142 what ...

[@yasirrakhurrafat1142]

@@christophermullins7163 .. tahw

[@OniMirage]

That's not the issue, it's the 10 series' lack of async threads.

[@aayushg8]

Fsr 3 is also energy saver for high end cards. Able to run cyberpunk at almost 4k with 100 frames while using 270-280w with 7900xt.

[@Dictatortot-n3d]

Holy shit thats energy saving? that power consumption is insane. Where I live electricity is very cheap but still that seems so high

[@drumyogi9281]

@@Dictatortot-n3dit is very high lol I live in California and power is crazy expensive. It sucks😂

[@arenzricodexd4409]

of course it will save energy because the game will run at lower resolution. the GPU does not need to work as hard as at higher res.

[@JeZZGro]

Then why you use high end GPU? Buy something less power demanding.

[@Djare915]

@@JeZZGro Maybe they need for work...

[@shortshins]

I hope all developers jump on fsr and implement it into all their games.

[@niezzayt3809]

That sounds more like "Lazy Wish" Why don't you hope for all developers to Optimize their games before even releasing it? Game devs rely too much on these technologies like DLSS, FSR, XeSS as if they admit they don't know how to optimize their game in the first place

[@Dictatortot-n3d]

FSR doesn't look good to me, makes things to soft

[@JM-kn9dh]

@@Dictatortot-n3dhave you tried 3.1?

[@pwnomega4562]

​@@JM-kn9dh no, they're an Nvidia fanatic 😂

[@arenzricodexd4409]

AMD need to pay them to do it. using FSR also means promoting AMD as a brand. no sane people want to do free marketing for AMD.

[@grizzlyindustries7593]

Happy that FSR 3 has finally started to come out. And happy to see you testing it on a GPU I currently own being the RX 5500 XT on a Ryzen 5 3600, 32gb DDR4, Bazzite OS system. One thing that I wish for is more game compatibility and testing with FSR 3. I tested the modded FSR 3 files on Cyberpunk 2077 back in March on a i5-3570k at 4.0ghz, 16gb DDR3 at 1600mhz, and both a GTX 1050 2gb and RX 560 2gb(both with larger, modded coolers on them and heavily overclocked staying at 60°C) on a custom, debloated Windows 11 system. I played the title Cyberpunk 2077 lowest settings 1080p with FSR 2 Performance around 25fps to 35fps on the RX 560 2gb. And around 30fps to 45fps on the GTX 1050 2gb. Ultra Performance FSR 2, FSR 1, and other upscaling methods would not yield better results. And neither would overclocking the CPU beyond 4.0ghz, Ram beyond 1600mhz, or the GPUs beyond there already insane overclocks provide better results too. After applying the FSR 3 mod files into Cyberpunk, the RX 560 2gb had glitching just like you said, yet it did increase the average framerate to around 45fps except with hitches and lows to 10fps. However, the GTX 1050 2gb increased to a 60fps average with lows to 30fps. Lowest being 28fps. It never hitched or glitched. Shockingly the FSR 3 mod files helped improve the GTX 1050 2gb by over 50℅ as well. The GTX 1050 2gb with the FSR 3 mod is over at my brother's house installed as a secondary system with the custom, debloated Window 11. He hasn't noticed anything either. Which is great and has me hoping that the developers would at least officially release FSR 3 on Cyberpunk. But seeing tge developers are wanting to leave the game. I have no hope, sadly. Also, the FSR 3 mods were easily reversably for me. I just dropped in the files on my GOG copy, and it replaced the game's DLSS setting into becoming the FSR 3 setting essentially. And when I didn't need it anymore. I just removed the mod files. Game worked like normal. Not that placing and removing mod files won't mess stuff up. That is definitely a high risk. But, I am used to modding. So there is that. Now, I can't say that for every single game or even the same exact experience with the game like me. I used the mod files only for this game to just to see if I could reach 60fps on a low end, low powered system that could sit and play on a television at 1080p to 720p. It wasn't a picky system to build. Just wanted to make a Steam Deck like device for my brother to use when he just wants to play a game and not have to mess with too much. And Cyberpunk 2077 was the only harder game giving me performance issues. Turns out the FSR 3 mod on an overclocked older system with the GTX 1050 2gb way overclocked yet at 60°C highest temp...it works. Oh! And I did use the FSR 3 mod on my higher end system with the Ryzen 5 3600 and RX 5500 XT. I went from my medium, high, and low settings on 1440p60hz with FSR 2 Quality at 55fps to 70fps. To FSR 3 Quality at 60fps to 90fps. Yet, despite the increase in framerate, it somehow slightly degraded the picture or gameplay. Looked a little too washed out. Plus, it felt unnecessary because the official FSR 2 Quality with my settings in Cyberpunk 2077 already had me happy playing on my 1440p60hz monitor anyway. So, I like the videos as always, Mr. Tech YES Man. Very interesting on your results with the official FSR 3. Well, at least whenever the game includs to even use FSR 3. And I liked how you used a GPU like my daily one too. Nice. Hope you have a good day. And I hope that FSR 3 gets better and is supported in more titles. Cause I like it. And it helps where it is needed.

[@niezzayt3809]

Hey Bryant. If possible, make a follow up video of these same hardware but with LSFG (Lossless Scaling Frame Generation) from Steam

[@techyescity]

Hey sure, can check that out for you. Never heard of that one, will check out! Cheers!

[@Epicsmileyman]

I've been using LSFG and it's crazy good, using it on my rx 5700xt and it's gonna keep the card kicking for the next couple years​@@techyescity

[@iamstartower]

​@@techyescity lossles scaling is an amazing tool that uses frame interpolation to make new frames up to 3x your base fps and includes some upscaling methods like fsr, integer scaling and a custom upscaler LS1 which is really good, works great with any modern gpu even the lowly gt1030 as long as you lock your frames to a fraction of your displays refresh rate, also has some options that allows offloading the frame generation and upscaling workload to a second gpu for some sick unofficial and asymmetrical SLI/CROSSFIRE alike configurations.

[@edalecu]

🎉 LSFG is a life saver! I use it for a few games where I am CPU bound and also to boost YT video that has only 25/30 FPS to double or even triple FPS ❤

[@Willbme4EVA]

@@iamstartower did somebody say SLI/Crossfire? My heart started to beat faster. I can foresee myself doing a swan dive into this rabbit hole.

[@anthonyrizzo9043]

You are 100 percent on target with that time strapped part. I get a couple hours to game sometimes at night when my kid goes to bed, any more time than that, and im sacrificing sleep because i work early. Generally, i dont mind tinkering. It's cool, and i like to do it, but i dont want to have to do it.

[@quantumjank3091]

Interesting video mate, but bit irritated your screen overlay for say Starfield says FSR 3.1 when we're talking FSR 3 right? Also good point about the RTX 4000 series at least the higher end on my 4070 Ti rig I do not bother with Frame Gen at all.

[@VovanUA-]

Bro, why did you test all these games when out of this entire list only Spiderman has FSR 3.1?

[@od1sseas663]

Because he’s stupid

[@jonbrandjes9024]

True only a hand full of games are FSR 3.1. Regular FSR 3 uses the old upscaling technique.

[@d.ink3d]

3.1 looks great, only tryd it in Ghosts of Tsushima so far where FSR3 already looked really good and its still a nice upgrade, looks crisp and way less ghosting.

[@jemborg]

Gidday. Thanks for that mate, interesting. Horizon FW has updated with FSR 3.1 frame gen. I tried all sorts of combinations of DLSS and FSR. It all seemed to work pretty well from my cursory glance. I was impressed. I was using a 4K LG OLED, 7800X3D/4090 setup. I'd be interested to see you test out that title.

[@Konrad-z9w]

What I always wonder is how the same GPU that lacks the raw rasterization power to produce enough fps but at the same time has enough power to run a frame generator on top of its maxed out rasterization for more fps.

[@FreshChriss]

Rendering a feal frame is much more gpu work than simply comparing two frames and generating a middle point in between. A rendered frame needs to work its way threw multiple individual stepps (start by searching for gpu render que to learn more). Also fsr frame generation is using something called async compute. Depending on how mutch the game utilizes async compute, the game has some left over headroom in that area if the game doesn't use it. The performance cost of frame generation is there, in that regard that it doesn't 2x your fps (compared to it beeing off) because you loose some fps before its doubling the remaining fps. Because of this you see something like a 60 fps game going up to around 100. So you loose 10 fps because of the extra frame gen work, it then doubles up the rest to 100. (60-10=50 , 50*2=100) This explanation is largely simplified, so you can get the idea. There are many more aspects that i can't explain in a simple comment, but i hope it helps you.

[@AlashAls]

Thank you Brian. We need more videos like this.

[@theoathman8188]

The problem with frame generation is that it requires vram, and most older gpus has low vram.

[@Sheerwinter]

Fsr 3.1 looks the same as the dlss 2 quality. But u can use the frame gen i guess. I think the rtx 30 series doesn't support dlss 3 fg. So it's a saviour for so many peoples. (I'm a 1050 ti guy)

[@iamstartower]

try lossless scaling

[@bodasactra]

Is this with the new AMD driver 24.6.1 with Anti Lag 2? Great work as usual, thanks for the hard work.

[@techyescity]

Yeah downloaded the latest driver for the AMD 5500 XT and the for the Nvidia card.

[@bodasactra]

@@techyescity Well done then. I was wondering, Perhaps you can answer. Why don't tech channels use AMD driver based frame gen in GPU comparisons but they do show Nvidia FG in games that support it when comparing with AMD GPUs. If its fair to do that then it should be fair to use AMD driver based FG in all the DX11/12 games it works with but do not support Nvidia FG. I hope that is not worded in a confusing way. I would like to see a tech channel focus on the advantages of AMD driver based FG, especially on lower end GPUs. Might make fora popular video with the budget crowd.

[@Greez1337]

​@@bodasactradriver based frame gen is an inconsistent crapshoot though.

[@Haywood-Jablomie]

​@@techyescity Say My Name !!! Hey Brian, yes it's me... Question... A game like Starfield... Game Pass Cloud Streaming version with ethernet cable and wired Controller vs Low end GPU + Upscaling ... comparing artifacts, resolution, loading and Input Lag etc. Please !!!

[@genocidehero9687]

mate! the activation watermark is killing me! gonna finally go legit and just use your code.

[@MarcoGPUtuber]

Tech YES City is Supercharging my potatoes!

[@JoshuaG]

11:01 Ooof "Nighting-ale" 🤣

[@Rick210Texans]

Good job buddy over 100 views in five minutes

[@BREEZYM6015]

I get 100 views in 6 months. 😂

[@MAADMAAC]

Which budget nvme2 pci 4 do you recommend?

[@Atilolzz]

Thanks for including RoboCop!

[@gamers-generation]

FSR3 FG mods (LukeFZ) do work particylarly in games supporting 2.2 but as you said, IMO its generally not worth it for the average person even if its much kore streamlined now. The exception to this would be if theres one specific title that they absolutely want and need it for.

[@conyo985]

Brian retest the 1060 make sure textures are set to low and enable fsr 3 frame generation again. It was running out of VRAM!

[@OniMirage]

The real issue is the 10 series lacking async threads. 32 on the gtx series vs 128 on rx series at the time.

[@conyo985]

@@OniMirage That could be the issue but other games on the video worked fine with FSR 3.1 with the 1060.

[@OniMirage]

@conyo985 most games that didn't originate on console use very few async threads. On pc you would have an easier time finding titles on the vr space than regular games.

[@jqwright28]

I just want to point out, no hate or anything, but according to AMD's press release, FSR 3.1 is only available currently in Playstation ports like Ghost of Tsushima and Horizon Forbidden West, the Spider-man games, stuff like that. So some of that visual artifacting you saw in Hobocop was probably due to the actual upscaler being fsr 2.2 or whatever and the fsr 3 is just doing framegen. Great video, though man. Thank you for showing people different settings other than Ultra and testing budget hardware.

[@OniMirage]

That's what nixxes worked on specifically. Nixxes isnt the only developer out there.

[@jqwright28]

@@OniMirage Except that is on AMD"s website as the games fsr 3.1 is available on today but yea it's coming to 60 more games eventually.

[@DavidJonSpem]

Jup I don't think Bryan caught on to this whilst making the video.

[@DavidJonSpem]

@@jqwright28 The 60 games just stated are for FSR 3 and not 3.1 necessarily. I hope they push 3.1 to more developers quickly cause some games look terrible with the current FSR 2.2/3.0 upscaler.

[@RetrOrigin]

FSR 3.1 doesn't seem to improve FrameGen, it's mainly intended to improve the Up[scaler image quality and de-couple FrameGen from the Upscaler. To me FrameGen is more like 1 step forward and 3 steps backwards. • Step forward: 1. smoother motion. • Steps backwards: 1. Lower image quality 2. Increased latency. 3. Increased VRAM utilization.

[@DavidJonSpem]

Exactly I don't think Bryan got the memo here either. He put FSR 3.1 on for games that only have FSR 3. You can look up the FSR 2 and 3 list online to see what games use what version.

[@itsme123126]

fsr frame generatio nis amazing. the new frame gen on lossless scaling is really amazing too. it works wonders trying to run games on my new 2k 165hz monitor on a rx6600

[@jimsingleton2589]

This is really interesting especially considering I have both of these cards, though not in my daily driver. As to "the future", I know this might sound crazy, but in my what if situation in my head, I imagine a time when a G series amd cpu that have FSR dedicated cores with the next gen iGPU in the X3D format.

[@MrPugheaven]

I use FSR on my 6900XT and it works like a charm in alot of games and hey... means I certainly don't have to rush out and spend £1k again on a card for some time and running everything at 4k! FSR is fantastic tbh

[@idanshahar]

Starfield isn't in the 3.1 supported game list, are you sure you're getting 3.1 there? :\

[@fedepede04]

It's only 6 games for now that support fsr 3.1, most of the ones you tested did not. Plus the main thing in fsr 3.1 over fsr 3.0 is the internal upscaler and the decuple of fsr upscaler and fsr frame gen.

[@DavidJonSpem]

FSR 3.1 over 3.0 is the improved upscaler quality. Besides this change they decoupled the frame generation so you can use it without FSR upscaling. And the 6 games you mention are thus far the playstation titles ported by Nixxies. Also some games were already able to use FSR 3 frame gen besides the upscaler. Like Ghost of Tushima did before the 3.1 update. It's just that other games didn't do this or else you needed to mod FSR 3 framegen into a game.

[@AlexHusTech]

*100HP+ for the older GPUS!*

[@leonmilne7126]

You should do a video on the Lossless Scaling program available on Steam, $10 gives you double or triple FPS in any game or program, even KZbin. I'm playing Squad, a relatively ambiguous milsim which is notoriously unoptimized at 150fps with no noticeable latency.

[@giovannip.1433]

What some people may not have considered is that Frame generation can open the gaming market up to many more people - e.g. people that can't afford new hardware or are on extremely tight budgets like many people in non 'Western' nations.

[@sludgefactory241]

Bro I'm in a western country and there's no way in hell that I can afford any GPU over let's say 150 USD max. Idk if I'd buy one if I did have the cash. Some of those are stupid money.

[@endmymiseryyy7908]

Would love a video of you benchmarking Lossless Scaling frame generation.

[@pharmdiddy5120]

Got a pretty decent system with a 12600k and RX 6750 XT... Some of the graphically intense things you can take or leave doing upscaling but I still haven't found a good reason to do frame generation yet. Probably will be a good thing to give this thing a little longer lifespan though

[@nickdibart]

Not every game that supports AMD fluid motion frame gen has an option for it. As long as you have it enabled in the AMD software, it should be compatible with DX11 and 12 games with Vsync disabled. AMD recommends you use the anti-lag feature/option within their software as well to reduce latency.

[@Nero_9000]

Is this officially on older cards gtx 1000 ones??? Or is this a mod? Also is the mod free cause I'm broke and have a 1080ti 😂

[@katogonkato]

I'd like to see FSR 3's FG vs lossless scaling's FG.

[@Folsomdsf2]

fyi, the 10 series card doesn't support all dx12 features, I wonder if it's literally just async. 'This was a huge problem for nvidia until they pretty much convinced people while the 700/900/10 series were all the models for sale NOT To use this feature.

[@jonbrandjes9024]

There are more DX12 features 10 series mis. Hardware RT, DirectML and Hardware Meshshaders to name a few.

[@Folsomdsf2]

@@jonbrandjes9024 some of what you're talkinga bout is actually not dx12, that's dx12u. They advertised them as dx12, dx12u wasn't out yet.

[@The.Crawling.Chaos.]

Sounds good but here is a thought, Why would GPU makers create proper driver support for fsr 3.1 if it's that good?

[@mrfleagal]

fsr 3 frame gen is likely going to be a massive help for handhelds like the steam deck and rog ally as well

[@dianaalyssa8726]

Have a 1060 on the shelf, good for it's time or was a decent first gpu I suppose.

[@kenshirogenjuro873]

It would be funny if Nvidia is purposely bugging their drivers to prevent FSR frame gen from interfacing on their own older cards to help force their users to adopt 40-series cards more. It would certainly be on-brand.

[@arenzricodexd4409]

that is outright stupid thing to do. nvidia is not that stupid. if anything making competitor tech work on their GPU has been working well for nvidia to keep their dominance (remember freesync?). if nvidia do such thing on their older card then people know nvidia will also going to do it for future cards. that alone will make people more wary about buying next gen gpu. keep supporting competitor open tech and their own proprietary tech will mean nvidia user will have more options in the future rather than just stuck will less option.

[@kenshirogenjuro873]

@@arenzricodexd4409 in a market where fanboyism didn't exist it would certainly be stupid. But fanboyism does exist, and the fact is over 95% of people buying Nvidia GPUs right now would continue to, it doesn't really matter what Nvidia does. That said, watching the whole video I doubt it's Nvidia actively doing anything, more like a bug on one particular game. Most of the issues noted look like devs just needing to catch up with this driver release. We'll just see how it goes.

[@arenzricodexd4409]

@@kenshirogenjuro873 you can combine AMD and nvidia fanboy together and they still can't make into 1% of GPU total sales world wide. look at the comment everywhere. it seems like everyone is hating nvidia and yet for years nvidia keep gaining market share and right now they have over 80% the market for themselves.

[@sargonsblackgrandfather2072]

@@arenzricodexd4409bro Nvidia literally denied DLSS framegen to non series 4 card users just cuz “f*ck you but a new card sucker!” It was the final straw for me to ditch team green.

[@gutserker]

I kind of don't really have a use for frame gen, if the requirement is exclusive fullscreen. The only chance I have to play games is when streaming. I'm on an EX 6800xt and 3440x1440p monitor, so 100fps isn't hard to reach for most games. I just use dynamic resolution, rather than frame generation. I also don't feel the need to run uncapped fps higher than my monitor

[@evilleader1991]

In Robocop did you try turning on Anti-Lag through Adrenaline on the 5500 XT?

[@cyclonous6240]

We really need compitition in hardware department to NVIDIA so that innovations like these will happen more and more.

[@patrickmcgovern4004]

This seems like something that could help me keep my gaming experience smooth when I'm using my htpc.

[@OniMirage]

That's how it should be used, to maintain frame rate. Using it to boost frames with no latency benefit is disingenuous calling it performance and nvidia should be shamed for starting the conversation.

[@wertywerrtyson5529]

Here in Sweden they have started lowering interest rates and claim inflation is over. So the money supply is about to increase again which might affect prices.

[@Laconic_]

FSR 3.1 with Halo Strixpoint APUs will be impressive.

[@Puwpl]

anti-lag 2 came out for the public, fsr 3.1 is coming out on more and more games. Being an AMD user is getting better and better by the day

[@user-dw6fj1py1o]

Great Video!

[@1Grainer1]

jumped to some ghost of tsushima, which seems to have some ghosting on FSR 3.1, but that's all, overall visual quality in the video looks exactly the same for me

[@raptor1672]

I'm not sure about the car breaking down analogy, people still buy Land Rovers with a passion! 🤣

[@OniMirage]

FSR uses asynchronous compute. The 10 series has very low capabilities for async, something like 32 threads max vs amd at the time with 128. Nvidia didn't use such rendering until the 20 series via tensor cores so if you have a game that uses heavy asynch, spiderman, and then ask it to do frame gen it's going to bog down. This would apply to any 10 series but obviously less an issue as you go the scale due to raw power.

[@baconn1ce]

do you need to install a mod for the games to run fsr 2 and 3 on nvidia? or can you select it in game?

[@boynextdoor931]

You can select it in game if the game has it. If not then you will have to install mods.

[@poinguan]

What is the lowest end graphics card that can support this FSR3.1 (frame gen)? I have nvidia GTX750.

[@HuntaKiller91]

If there's a workaround for AMD software wizards to do AFMF 2.0 based on FSR 3.1 That would be a super big win for handhelds❤

[@mitchel71]

I have a 3060. I try it out in anything super demanding, but if it's giving me stutters or latency, it gets turned off. Fps I generally won't touch it. I am playing st 1440p, so in some titles it helps

[@cs_mns]

I hate upscaling but I do have to use to on my 4090 when playing c2077 in 4k (1440p if you will). I don't use frame gen tho, there's too much input latency.

[@Lucaat]

I am still good with 6800XT, I will wait for RDNA4 and see if that is a worthy upgrade in terms of ray tracing and raster somewhat.

[@BREEZYM6015]

I still game on a 1060 6GB Turbo. I want to upgrade to a newer card but aren't sure which GPU would be the best fit for an i7 8700k.

[@ikram2512]

Rtx 3060 or rtx 2060 will be good for ur CPU Or u can get rx 6600

[@Dictatortot-n3d]

@@ikram2512 rx 6600 for sure. Good prices new and used.

[@tonydwietwarze]

If you're on a budget I would suggest Smth with a lot of Vram, as it's the thing that future-proofs your GPU ....

[@winonesoon9771]

I would just buy the most powerful card you can in your budget..... Then you can eventually upgrade your CPU and get even more frames down the line......

[@Arejen03]

rx 6750 xt, intel arc a 750/580, rtx 3060 12 gb

[@kjellbeats]

your houseflipper character looks exactly like you xD

[@Alonso89077]

The only thing i'd want from AMD is fixing their input latency because when I switched to AMD rx 6600xt my input latency felt like 4x or 5x the input latency nvidia had and I had to switch back to nvidia because I play competitive games.

[@jeofthevirtuoussand]

i hope fsr 3.1 actually looks good at lower resolutions

[@histerical90]

LukeFZ mod works for a lot of titles too especially in those which support only DLSS FG.

[@aargoth82]

And the free alternative like DLSS Enabler

[@patrikmiskovic791]

Amd is keeping old GPUs alive unlike Nvidia

[@riichobamin7612]

Rx7800XT and Rx7900 GRE are looking better and better 😂😂😂

[@sargonsblackgrandfather2072]

7900 GRE with fsr 3.1 and framegen is great value

[@riichobamin7612]

@@sargonsblackgrandfather2072 yeop

[@mintymus]

Except for FSR generally looks terrible, especially with hair.

[@riichobamin7612]

@@mintymus 1. Upscaling tech can and will improve. 2. There is no premium for FSR, it is open source and available to all. 3. Rx7900 GRE's competition is RTX4070 Super. Sure DLSS is better than FSR (currently), but guess what, you cannot increase VRAM of a GPU. Upscaling will improve.

[@Alonso89077]

@@riichobamin7612 Yes you can improve VRAM of a GPU

[@TheBoltcranck]

15:55 well, if you never try you will never know.

[@AndyMutz]

whats the outro song?

[@ugurinanc5177]

How did you get FSR3.1? i can't find even SDK. They say it will release in july

[@jonbrandjes9024]

Ganes will usually recieve it before AMD publishes the SDK. Happened with FSR 2.2 as well.

[@Olivier13680]

Is FSR allowed on VR games ?! it would be a good way for reach stable FPS !

[@rob4222]

The 1060 may not have enough VRAM for frame generation

[@duifel688888]

try to use full screen mode maby than it works what i see in the video was not full screen mode

[@quintrapnell3605]

While it’s great it still requires a dev to clock in and patch the game without breaking something else. This is a fact that has greatly diminished any praise. Publishers aren’t motivated to implement incremental improvements in the product.

[@aargoth82]

For that you have free mods translating DLSS into FSR3 giving you Frame Generation capability in over 20 games already....

[@cptmorgs]

Bryan love your content as always man, I have an issue when I play games with FSR 1.0-3.1 My System freezes and restarts I have all up-to-date drivers and Windows 11 updated with a Ryzen 9 7900X3D and a RX 7800XT With Smart access memory on. temps seem good while playing so any suggestions would be great

[@techyescity]

Is it only when you turn these settings on in games? I would look to disabling the onboard GPU for your CPU (you can do this deep in the bios settings manually with AMD PBS or CBS settings (I forgot which one it was).

[@cptmorgs]

@@techyescity well I went to do this realising my bios was from the boards release in 2022 so decided I'd update it got to 55% and flash failed and seems as my bios is done for :(

[@techyescity]

@@cptmorgs what board do you have, should have biosflash back, if something is crashing in bios, that means CPU or ram is bad. most likely a faulty ram stick.

[@cptmorgs]

@@techyescity I have the MSI x670-P WiFi motherboard I couldn't find anywhere that mentions bios flashback but the ram has been working since I purchased and built it last year

[@Pandamonium004]

Has anyone had any issues getting Robocop to run with DLSS or FSR on with a RTX 4060?? Every cutscene crashes the game to the desktop. Saw it here in the benchmarks in another video and it looked like a fun game but the fps is terrible without dlss and frame gen etc. Makes me miss my old 1080ti, may have been getting slow but it was bulletproof reliable!

[@leeishere7448]

I still prefer lossless scaling with its own frame generation.

[@NicheNick2003]

I'm waiting for the dlss2fsr mod get updated with this version and use it on Minecraft rtx

[@Steve30x]

Did fsr 3.1 win or did the graphics cards win?

[@BladeCrew]

The best thing is nvidia users have nvidia reflex that they can put on boost+on and get lower latency than that of amd.

[@AthosRac]

what about the rx580x?

[@acegear]

the question is how to get fs3 on older games

[@jacksonbtb571]

The new ark game desperately needs this

[@y_chefy9821]

Does fsr 3.1 work with apex legends

[@KillaGorilla-l7z]

I think it’s better when you turn Vsync on.

[@valentinmazar531]

I my country those cards are selling for 120€

[@VK92KL]

Guys, be careful buying those win10 keys, just bought one and its incorrect

[@MrSamadolfo]

email them and request another key

[@xXDarthBagginsXx]

I've had zero issues with win10 Pro and win11 Pro keys from the SCDkey site - put in a ticket with the site and they will fix it.

[@VK92KL]

@@MrSamadolfo I did, they told me they will refund me provided that I didnt use it. I will let you guys know if it was successfully refunded. Otherwise I will make them pay otherwise, haha.

[@jqwright28]

If AMD can do this, Nvidia could. I think Nvidia nerfs the lower end gpus now because they don't want another 1060 6gb situation where people just stick with something like the 3060 for 7 years. They want 60/70 class owners to upgrade every gen to get a new exclusive feature. They're like Apple, lol.

[@da3sii]

i dont think robocop has fsr 3.1

[@od1sseas663]

It doesn’t. He’s just stupid

[@devjitdutta5670]

The Pascal series DO NOT support FG. AMD themselves stated that FG needs RX 5000 series & up and the RTX 2000 series & up. Testing the 1060 is pointless.

[@jonbrandjes9024]

Video is wrong! Only Spiderman uses FSR 3.1. FSR 3.0 uses the same upscaler as FSR 2.2. FSR 3.0 only added Frame Generation. FSR 3.1 has a better upscaler and decoupled the frame generation from the upscaler.

[@nicmonberg5974]

"Around $50" not in my country gtx1060 6gb is closer to $100 and rx5500xt $120 preowned.

[@toonnut1]

Great video but I doubt nvidia will do open source unfortunately that's never going to happen. It's more interested in AI 👍

[@remnantchannel2434]

LOSSLESS SCALING is MUCH better than FSR and DLSS. its works in all games😊

[@MadridistaFrieren]

Please test XESS too Bryan, it's better ( me & tim hardware unboxed confirm).

[@techyescity]

Which game do you think it's better in? I have tested Xess in a few titles now, haven't really been wowed by it vs DLSS or FSR.

[@typhlo9797]

Amd gets alot of flak for being behind nvidia in everything... and sure they are but even if their tec is worse in alot of ways, they dont lock you to a certain card and they are usually more open with their software. Is it because they have to? Sure, maybe. But they are doing it nontheless.

[@rogerdewitt3042]

DLSS started on the GeForce RTX 2060 & up. No DLSS on any Nvidia GTX XX60 and below cards yet seems some cards such as GTX 980 Ti and other Ti cards can work with software seen more CUDA cores. When using Nvidia cards stick with any with XX70, XX80, XX90 you be fine. The Radeon RX 5500 XT is a mid-range graphics card by AMD, launched on December 12th, 2019. GTX 1060 released July 19, 2016 a much older card not fair to compare with. Fair compare same year is On July 2, 2019, the GeForce RTX Super line of cards was announced, which comprises higher-spec versions of the 2060, 2070 and 2080. Each of the Super models were offered for a similar price as older

[@arenzricodexd4409]

nvidia just decided not to bother running DLSS purely on shaders because it will be more complicated work. Gamer nexus shows the issue before when AI workload and game rendering have to compete for compute resource on the shaders with GTX1080 vs RTX2060. when XeSS first comes out we finally see the issue first hand.

[@Darth001]

The gtx 1060 was always compared side by side with the rx 580 and the rx 5500xt is basically an Rx 580 but lower power model that's why TYC compares them

[@rjackdaw]

this will save my rx6600

[@raresmacovei8382]

What's with the video bait? FSR 3.1 is only available in the last 5 Nixxes points and nothing else for now. Dislike.

[@DavidJonSpem]

Jup Bryan put FSR 3.1 on for games that only use FSR 3. I don't think he knows what FSR 3.1 really added. It improved the upscaler and decoupled the frame generation.