The LS3 factory intake is hard to beat dollar for dollar.
@shadowopsairman15833 жыл бұрын
TBSS
@Funtimes6703 жыл бұрын
@@shadowopsairman1583 cathedral yes!
@mikeverything40983 жыл бұрын
Where can I find one for cheap
@sebastiansidney18562 жыл бұрын
Will it fit on lm7
@Funtimes6702 жыл бұрын
@@sebastiansidney1856 you talking about the LS3? No it’s square port where the LM7 is cathedral port. The TBSS is the best for the cathedral port.
@Onelowrado3 жыл бұрын
Id like to see the stock ls3 mani with 102 mm tb
@FredRTP962 жыл бұрын
It does no difference, gpi recently tested this and will be releasing results
@billk96283 жыл бұрын
Why you folks don't have the sponsors, I don't know! I just dumped on horse power TV for even attempting to run a carb on an LS engine, Why? I don't care how much Holley pays you, Why would you dump the factory PCM programming for a dam carburetor? You CAN tune that system and make all those numbers with stock parts! Do you really think GM's engineers are that dumb?
@philllsxga.77373 жыл бұрын
Exactly!!! You would one go backwards...
@pawpatina2 жыл бұрын
Fast LSXR adds 11hp and 5tq BUT COSTS $1000+ AND NEEDS ANOTHER $500-1000 IN PARTS TO FIT IT????? You guys are drunk or something... putting $2000 worth of intake on a $500 motor to gain 10~hp wtf...
@jessemurray17573 жыл бұрын
on stock cubes and RPM under 7000 the stock intake is the one to get, its been proven time and time again.
@chomin30253 жыл бұрын
Big CI engines are the ones that need the extra air, same in the head game.
@Backupnow-gf7wb3 жыл бұрын
You need to put a 102 Throttlebody on the stock intake, I like to see those numbers 👍👍👍👍👍
@sepg50842 жыл бұрын
Won't fit.
@Kekzuu7132 жыл бұрын
@@sepg5084 What size is stock ls3 intake? Trying to figure out if I need to buy intake and tb or just tb
@FredRTP96 Жыл бұрын
Gpi tested this and had 0 gains
@topvideos61663 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this test . I was planning to go with bigger intake then what I have now which is the MSD 102. I think it's almost the same one of the Fast small intake which is the best mod of the street dually driving also good for the natural aspirated engine with no boost
@nowayjose5963 жыл бұрын
Gwatney Performance and Hot Rod have done the same dyno tests (except Gwatney used a ported LS3 intake). Gwatney saw the same gains when going to the 102mm TB vs the 92mm on the FAST, but commented that in their experience those gains don't transfer over to the chassis dyno due to the design restrictions of the intake plumbing leading up to the TB.
@huntermckinley5933 ай бұрын
I could see that for sure. My tbss has a 3" intake right now and 90mm tb so when I do go with a fast 102 and 102mm tb I'll be building or buying a 4" intake with ls7 maf because otherwise it's a waste of money buying the bigger throttle body. One thing I retained from college is air/fluid/electricity will only flow as much as the smallest diameter in the system. You can have 10 miles of 4 inch pipe and 1 inch of 3" and it'll only flow what that 3" can flow
@Doucettedon3 жыл бұрын
I would keep the LS3 and stock throttle body and invest the leftover pile of money towards a turbo and tune.
@tonkatoytruck3 жыл бұрын
Hard to beat that LSXR for stealth and performance.
@christophermix68453 жыл бұрын
Impressive how much power that throttle body added!
@Chris-yy7qc3 жыл бұрын
More like: How much it unlocked. ;-)
@christophermix68453 жыл бұрын
@@Chris-yy7qc true haha.
@shadowopsairman15833 жыл бұрын
Bigger hole
@aphil4581 Жыл бұрын
It's like the hole engine build was to show that a 440Ci 630 hp engine has to have and needs a 102TB.
@bigredracer78483 жыл бұрын
All them intakes will fit fine under the hood of my suburban
@VinnieSuhfatwop3 жыл бұрын
What motor mounts are you using to have the highrise fit??
@VinnieSuhfatwop3 жыл бұрын
I have an 86' and doubt that would fit
@james107393 жыл бұрын
That is minimal gains on a lot bigger and Wilder motor than most of us are running so there would be less of a change
@MrDerekRobinson2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I didn't know majority of the LS guys on the track and street were running 441 Cubic Inch LS engines 🤣
@ShawnGilbert19672 жыл бұрын
If they are NA they may, what I'm stumped at is why not LS7 top end when your talking 441ci? I'm basically using a HD stock replacement head on my sleeved 427ci engine and gain 50hp stock to stock...LS3 vs LS7...why on earth would you go to 441 and not run a monster raised runner say MAST Black label LS7 head which would make big power with more compression on this.....most of the big shops move over as soon as you go 4.125 bore plus.... Nothing wrong with LS3 top end but this engine is obviously not worried about a little extra money....
@racerd96693 жыл бұрын
You really needed to test the Escalade factory intake and the CID intake.
@UncleDonDon2 жыл бұрын
I would've liked to see a stock truck intake tested. I've heard tales of sneaky power......when you can fit it under the hood.
@TheCycle23003 жыл бұрын
Gee, did you pick a big enough cam? Not at all a "common" set up.
@randallsavage37952 жыл бұрын
I went .4 quicker after junking a sheet metal intake for a fast lsxr 102 with the stock throttle body. Recent dyno pulls indicate the shorter runners should help the combo. combo is a big C.I. pump gas N/A setup.
@mikeverything40983 жыл бұрын
I just bought my trans am I’m on a budget and by the end of this year I would like to be at 500 hp please anyone with knowledge of the stock ls1 drop the best and cheapest combos I can do I’m 20 and have help from nobody but my damn self
@vikenlink2 жыл бұрын
I have to mention…. Great test, love intake comparison tests… BUT…. You’re over caming the engine and are loosing power everywhere except maybe peek RPM. The intake and exhaust duration is to high, not a good cam choice for the stock LS3 intake or any long runner intake. A 440 ci LS Stroker engine should be using a cam 234-238 intake @ 50 and a exhaust duration at about 246@ 50 with a 110-112 LSA . I believe you will make more power and torque with all the intake manifolds being tested throughout the power band. I know what I’m talking about from experience.😏
@srage91882 жыл бұрын
This setup should be pushing 660hp on 93 and 700hp on race gas. Too much cam, and cylinder head and not enough port velocity or compression. Just my opinion.
@OEMishGarage3 жыл бұрын
It would have been interesting to see a ported stock intake with the rod mod tested as well.
@smokingasphalt80503 жыл бұрын
Agreed! Excellent test here none the less👍🏼
@Mosfet5103 жыл бұрын
I like that fast lsx r 102, that and the sniper gave a big bump in the numbers. Nice one.
@andrewcammer25352 жыл бұрын
I'm trying to imagine building a big cube motor like that with all that camshaft (which undoubtedly needs more split) and then saddling it with abysmal sub 8:1 dynamic compression. Imagine how much more responsive and driveable that would be if it gained a little LSA, added 10* of exhaust duration, and slide the static compression up into at least the mid 12.x:1 range. Guessing we got a combination built for something else, and just got pulled into some NA testing.
@ShawnGilbert19672 жыл бұрын
I was thinking same thing, needs to even for street 93 be at least mid 11 to 1 like 11.7ish with that cam, setup a flex fuel tune... I'd like to have seen a better cam but also for love of God the mid length LSXHR runners vs the Hi Ram would have been awesome, same for mid on the LsXr vs the HR and Hi ram... Nice data though...
@transmissionsrus68082 жыл бұрын
Does the Fast LSX with the 102mm throttle body require tuning?
@JorgeRodriguez-jd7qe2 жыл бұрын
Yes to adjust air flow and throttle response
@lewtninja2 жыл бұрын
the real question is why would you put ls3 heads on a motor with a 4.125 bore? it should be ls7 heads as they make more power everywhere.
@kwdthatsme27112 жыл бұрын
Outstanding Test and video etc… Congrats on the effort and thank you for making time to produce this test/comparison action - much obliged, Sir!
@TheHorsepowerMonster2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@justingriffith29912 жыл бұрын
@@TheHorsepowerMonster ls3 is good foorbcar
@Ls_corvette2 жыл бұрын
I need that fast 102 throttle body and mainifold. These supercharged jags at west palm need to get beat even harder than k already spank them.
@jamestehuna59153 жыл бұрын
I just got my first V8 SSV Holden Commodore and this video helped me so much with which way I want to go in my build
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Thanks for watching
@dougleitz11343 жыл бұрын
What a cool car! I always wanted a Pontiac G8 but settled with a mild built 07 GP GXP
@jamestehuna59152 жыл бұрын
@@dougleitz1134 I hope you get it mate
@jamestehuna59152 жыл бұрын
@anonymous I’ve got a walkinshaw intake throttle body I don’t have yet but I’ve ordered a 102 mm airflow throttle body billet
@Thedonron123 жыл бұрын
A stock LS3 Intake Manifold with the "Radius Mod" applied is the best bang for your buck.
@angelb41433 жыл бұрын
Radius mod? As in port the stock manifold?
@Thedonron123 жыл бұрын
@@angelb4143 Negative, as in add steel rods above the intake runners to increase velocity. Google LS3 intake manifold rod mod
@angelb41433 жыл бұрын
@@Thedonron12 thanks man!
@Thedonron123 жыл бұрын
@@angelb4143 No problem! Check out my small channel. I made a few videos on mine with the rod mod , and a dyno.
@angelb41433 жыл бұрын
@@Thedonron12dude I just checked and ive already watched about half of your videos! Lol didnt realize I was speaking to the famous donron! Haha sick vette man that spinmonster sounds sick!
@mathewshackelford80373 жыл бұрын
What size injectors did he swap to with the 102 intake?
@andyromero71452 жыл бұрын
This is a great video literally answered all my questions thank you!!
@joshtheking17723 жыл бұрын
Stopped watching at 5:40. You ruined the test. Get it right.
@TheGuruStud3 жыл бұрын
These engine dynos are more inflated than kiddies claims on Honda forums
@timewarpvideo62443 жыл бұрын
Impressive gains by adding the throttle body
@wayne007nz2 жыл бұрын
99% of us dont have a 441 square bore LS with custom heads, so which is actually best for the average Jo with a stock to mild engine.
@MrDerekRobinson2 жыл бұрын
Yes we do. They said it the video. You have a 441. You just need to act like you do and pretend like the rest of the guys in the video
@ricoElGallo3 жыл бұрын
That lsx gon need a bigger cam and better headers for max performance. For me thats gonna be the go to even tho looks wise im not a fan
@shaneshane13792 жыл бұрын
440? And all it made was 600! 😂🤣
@gmcstacy10652 жыл бұрын
They kept changing the throttle bodies and swapped injectors. Thought this was supposed to be a test on intakes only. You cant compare when additional mods were done constantly. SMH
@TheHorsepowerMonster2 жыл бұрын
Engines are a system. With the stock manifold, the injectors were at just over 90% duty cycle. Enough to make sure we got the most ourt of the stock intake manifold. But we knew the aftermarket manifolds would be able to pull more air into the engine. So if we left the stock injectors in and max'ed them out on the duty cycle, we'd get an artificially low number for the intake performance. Since they are capable of more, they needed more injector. If you left the same injectors in them, you get the result that the aftermarket intakes really aren't any better than stock, when that's not true. Same with the throttle bodies. The stock throttle body is properly sized for the stock intake, so that delivered it's best performance. Some of the aftermarket intakes had a larger throat, so we installed a throttle body that matched it.
@georgeowen20838 ай бұрын
LSX intake is a fucking ripoff for 1200 dollars and only giving you 5 extra hp with a stock throttle body but an extra 15 with an aftermarket throttle body. I could think of some way better ways to increase power for 1200 bucks.
@masonmcnabb2429 Жыл бұрын
Stupid question but, I own a 99 Silverado with 5.3 vortec, what intake would fit on this?
@loganamurray64 Жыл бұрын
That should be a cathedral port engine, your best GM intake to use is off a Trailblazer SS, they aren’t too hard to find either
@Bikemad242 жыл бұрын
Im here to see how different his results are to Richard holdiners
@QRS365Күн бұрын
can a ls intake fit on a 2001 bmw x5 4.4? They look so similar.
@thomasparrigan78074 ай бұрын
I got a 6.0 with ls3 heads and intake swap and btr3 stage cam this is nice to see this applied ob the dyno great video
@TheHorsepowerMonster4 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@bdpilot288 ай бұрын
So, in order to get about a barely noticeable difference in HP and torque you have to spend close to two grand!
@Friedbrain113 жыл бұрын
So no test with the bigger injectors and throttle body on the stock intake? Not a complete test! Looks like comparing apples with oranges for some of the manifolds.
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
Not really. The bigger injectors would not have helped much with the stock manifold. The stock injectors weren't at full capacity yet, we just upgraded because we knew that the aftermarket intakes could flow more air. Bigger injectors may have changed the curve some but wouldn't have made a big change. Likewise, the Holley Sniper throttle body wouldn't have helped on the stock intake because the opening is only 90 millimeters in diameter. Putting a bigger throttle body wouldn't have helped because the throat on the intake manifold is the choke point. Not even sure if it has enough material to allow you to port the intake large enough to accept the Sniper throttle body. Thanks for watching.
@baby-sharkgto49023 жыл бұрын
The injector wasn't at all limiting the power of the LS3 intake but it most likely would have limited power on the better intakes if they didn't replace them.
@cperales982 жыл бұрын
I wonder how she would do with bigger primary headers
@vortecturbo2 жыл бұрын
Two things that was a poor camshaft design for the setup those heads look very promising and it had very little compression for that big of a cubic inch now mind you if that's set up would have been 12 to 1:00 which would have ran on 93 not optimal but would have ran on 93 and a camshaft along the lines of 258 on a 113 plus 3 268 or 272 at 50 on the exhaust side all of those intake manifolds would have done better but the Holly High Ram as well as the fast High Ram would have shined a lot better and had a lot more torque in the mid-range
@jessicaembers924 Жыл бұрын
10.7-1? Shit, my MX-5 Came 13-1 right out of the show room! And those manifolds ALL Look weird.
@damianellis35543 жыл бұрын
You already stated that it was unfair test I mean you changed injectors on the stock intake manifold from the fast which pulse with has a lot to do with Flo so you could have picked up some power there and you could have seen if the larger throttle body would have been proved flo all equaling two more power not really a fair test but I see you trying to sell your engine builders vs true test
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
How many people upgrade their fuel injectors on a stock intake? What's the point of testing it if nobody is going to do it? And likewise, if the higher flowing intake calls for more injector, it makes no sense to choke it off with the stock injectors. When I said it was an unfair test, I was only saying that the two high ram style intakes perform best with some form of forced induction.
@baby-sharkgto49023 жыл бұрын
The biggest injectors in the world would not have gotten anymore power out of the LS3 intake...... but yes there probably would have been a few ponies to be had by putting the larger throttle body on the LS3 intake but it would not change the results as it still would have finished last.
@GreatestHITS26 Жыл бұрын
I want that accessory drive you guys have on that engine for my ls engine where can i get the belt? So that everything works right
@keyvobless Жыл бұрын
Gonna look into the sniper throttle
@prestigemotorsports3 жыл бұрын
Great video as always, Jeff!
@michaelkattouah21542 жыл бұрын
I have a saab 5.3 and the OEM TB is 87mm and if i put the fast LSK on do i have to get a 102mm TB to see increase
@VAMCVETS Жыл бұрын
I thought the FAST intake wasn't worth it unless you have heads, cam, etc. to really make the gains worth it?
@armondogarcia75322 жыл бұрын
The lsx fast with 102 Th.body an 100oct. Gas an your good,, if the rest of the engine is up for it lol
@jamaalbarnett8161 Жыл бұрын
Amazon prime says that the LSXr manifold doesn't fit my 2011 camaro ss...
@jeremialvarez6558 Жыл бұрын
Can I use the 102mm intake manifold upper with the stock lower shell or do I need the 102mm lower shell?
@jesusmj6022 жыл бұрын
I have a 2012 gmc sierra 4.8 does anyone know if it has one of those manifold left?
@OD_Plays8 ай бұрын
I don't know if I should get a ptr or a mid for my ls7. Can someone help out
@ktwosrt8life3 жыл бұрын
Can we please see one for the hemis I love your guys videos
@jramirez90913 жыл бұрын
So which one do i buy
@88_TROUBLE_883 жыл бұрын
Stick with the stock
@Sebastianbartledoo Жыл бұрын
why didnt that thing make 700hp? thats alot of motor
@aphil4581 Жыл бұрын
Shows that the stock Ls3 heads can make as much power as a ls7 with after market parts, big cubes, low compression and freak cam with a tiny split for high rpm. Not something I would build though. A good heads cam with 12 to1 compression on 93 octane 416Ci would have been a much more common street/track build.
@loganamurray64 Жыл бұрын
But at the same time, with heads a LS7 will pretty easily make 700whp N/A. Displacement always wins in the end
@mattmo86119 ай бұрын
Impressive how little this does to the ls3.
@custommotor3 жыл бұрын
Since this is on a engine dyno and not in a car. Why not start at a lower rpm? Like off idle? Most cars live between 1-4K RPM and we never see how they perform down low.
@MrDerekRobinson2 жыл бұрын
Because no one actually builds stroker motors to be heavily interested in the way a car performs between 1 to 4k rpms like they're trying to save on gas mileage for manifold choice selecting purposes as they do based on mid to high rpm power when choosing. Living in 1 to 4k rpm is also driving in multiple gears which the power output would vary by which gear based on current desired speed and won't be much worth the comparison at 1k to 2k rpms. A range that is over in matter of milliseconds. That would basically multiply the time it takes to test all these intakes and no one lives in 4th gear for dyno sake from idle at full throttle in a muscle car for study sake when these intakes have a very specific operating rpm efficiency range starting from 3k rpm and up.
@Wasdfg6032 жыл бұрын
What’s the difference between him and Holdener’s test?
@CC-wt9vi2 ай бұрын
Been best to test it on a stock ls3 motor. Not a modded one.
@TheHorsepowerMonster2 ай бұрын
The engine would have run out of power before the benefits of the more aggressive intake manifolds would have shown up. These aren't intakes designed for stock engines.
@chriscraft770222 жыл бұрын
damn
@williambartholomew56803 жыл бұрын
Like to know how the sniper TB compare to the stock TB on the dyno, bet it's better bang per buck horsepower than the intake manifold
@massivefins25973 жыл бұрын
Where was the Holley AirForce intake? Its supposed to be the top intake on the market... uhg...
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
I could be wrong -- it's happened before -- but I didn't think they make one for the LS3. Thanks for watching
@massivefins25973 жыл бұрын
@@TheHorsepowerMonster ooops your right, its LT1, LS1, LS2, LS6-7 only.
@arealmaintenanceandrepairl1103 Жыл бұрын
do these all need tunes
@darnice11253 жыл бұрын
Too bad you didn't test the stock intake with the bigger TB (if it would fit) and the larger injectors. Would have been more fair then.
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
The larger throttle body doesn't fit. The throat on the stock intake is too small.
@ayo3v Жыл бұрын
what engine ltr is that ?? great video !!!!!! 👍👍👍👍👍👍
@TheHorsepowerMonster Жыл бұрын
441 cubic inches = 7.2 liters
@kingcosworth26432 жыл бұрын
They should of tested the stock manifold with the 102mm TB
@TheHorsepowerMonster2 жыл бұрын
There isn't really a point to that. The bottleneck is the throat of the intake manifold, so adding a larger throttle body won't help make power.
@artagain89773 жыл бұрын
Would love to see this comparison on a stock LT1.
@shadowopsairman15833 жыл бұрын
Gen 2 or Gen 5?
@chesspiece812 жыл бұрын
Is this a stock block or s Dart block? It looks like those are 6 bolt heads bur they're not being used. I can only imagine what that 441ci engine sounds like with that cam. I built an 11.8 CR 416ci LS3 with a 240/250 with .623 .617 114 and it sounded awesome.
@aphil4581 Жыл бұрын
I'm building a 427ci ls3, 4.1 stroke. 11.7Cr, Dart pro1 heads, Cam Motion 688 lift 248/263 112 split. 7600rpm/750hp. Fast 102B.
@chesspiece81 Жыл бұрын
@A Phil As cast Dart Pro 1 and Fast or ported? I hope it's going in a light chassis with a ton of rear gear and high 4200-4400 stall converter if automatic. If a manual behind it use a light flywheel and clutch to get it to Rev quickly. I had a Yank SS3600 in a 4L65E with 4.10 gears on 28" tall tires. I needed a 4200-4400 stall and needed to port the L92 intake, 102mm TB, and spent more time on the tune it would have gone from 11.8 to 11.2-11.4. Your setup will probably eat up nitrous like mine would have but I never sprayed it.
@aphil4581 Жыл бұрын
@@chesspiece81 Going to use a Fast Mid runner. Old setup 1998 T/A 418Ci. ls2 Stroker. GMPP ls3 heads, Stock intake 98mm tb, 4l60 Moser 9" 4:11. 3600 yank. 10.90 1/4mile 1.5 60foot.
@chesspiece81 Жыл бұрын
@A Phil I had WCCH Stage 2 or 2.5 LS3 heads. Upgrading from those heads and intake, your displacement bump and cam, swap from that 3600 to a higher stall. The Fast intake does really well sent to Tony Mamo to be ported, especially on that many CI. I think Greg Good is the go-to guy for the Dart Pro 1 heads. At least he was when I had them on an 8.8 CR 408ci Va Speed spec 236/236 .632 114LSA cam for a turbo 4th Gen Camaro. Are you going to run the motor on E85 or just 91 or 93 octane? With a progressive 125 or 150 shot and traction, there's no reason why you shouldn't run some 9.3-9.5 on spray and maybe some 10.2 off.
@K-Effect3 жыл бұрын
I would've liked to seen what the stock intake manifold would have done with the bigger injectors and the bigger throttle body. I don't even know if you can put a bigger throttlebody on the stock intake? As always another great video, thank you
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
The throat on the stock intake is so much smaller the larger throttle body wouldn't have done any good. Thanks for watching.
@jebadias14683 жыл бұрын
I had to replay the comment at 2:08 three times to make sure I heard right. "Nothing to fancy or out of the ordinary which is exactly what a lot of guys are running both on the street and at the track". We defiantly have a different idea about what constitutes "out of the ordinary" and "a lot". I don't know anybody who has that kind of engine, let alone runs it on the street. I understand using an engine which moves a lot of air to stress the intakes, but you would have to be pretty out of touch to try passing that off as anything close to common.
@sergeantseven4240Ай бұрын
No LSXRT?
@salem49752 жыл бұрын
What the pest one intake
@smiller2253 жыл бұрын
Why is that motor making peak power at 6000? Cam size compression?
@loganamurray64 Жыл бұрын
Part intake manifold, part cam mostly
@Meekmillan2 жыл бұрын
Maxbore to the rescue lol
@HioSSilver19993 жыл бұрын
That motor needs atleast a 105mm tb
@Someday.19922 жыл бұрын
Ok Richard
@lawrencecarter59172 жыл бұрын
Ls3 for me guys
@theog3783 жыл бұрын
Wich is the best one ??
@paciencia09562 жыл бұрын
Supercharged.
@frankquinney7892 жыл бұрын
you forgot the MSD Atomic Airforce
@TheHorsepowerMonster2 жыл бұрын
They don't make one for the LS3
@manitoublack3 жыл бұрын
would have been good to test the short runner options inside the LSX-R? keep up the good testing
@joejones2705 Жыл бұрын
😊
@painpain4836 Жыл бұрын
Great information
@mikeeagle26533 жыл бұрын
440 ci and it only made 500 hp. Something very wrong.
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
It never made less than 599.7 and as much as 637.4. What are you talking about?
@mikeeagle26533 жыл бұрын
@@TheHorsepowerMonster I watched it again I misheard the first number. Still down on power. You can get 550 hp out of a 5.3 with stock heads. This motor should be making 700 plus
@23steph133 жыл бұрын
Would a fast lsx intake make sense for 317 heads?
@phillipjackson47343 жыл бұрын
Yup it's gone breathe more
@Unique1Media2 жыл бұрын
Need these 4 go up against Hellcat, demon & 392 manifold? So we have options to choose from before we buy !
@MrDerekRobinson2 жыл бұрын
Confusing. Those manifolds don't go on an LS engine to compare
@loganamurray64 Жыл бұрын
Hellcats and Demons don’t really have manifolds thanks to their superchargers, you can’t really compare a boosted engine to N/A like that. The LS3 does have a better factory intake than the 392 though
@Unique1Media Жыл бұрын
@@loganamurray64 demon is 6.2 unless they put 392 in it
@Unique1Media Жыл бұрын
@@loganamurray64 6.2 more powerful than 392 n why NHRA uses demon motors 6.2 in the cars at NHRA Tony Stewart, (female) driver uses 6.2
@Unique1Media Жыл бұрын
@@loganamurray64 overall? 5.7 can handle upgrades better than any Hemi.
@zero-fg10123 жыл бұрын
Very awesome
@shadowopsairman15833 жыл бұрын
Depends on rpm range too
@romemedina47333 жыл бұрын
398 vs 409
@jareknowak87123 жыл бұрын
I wonder what are the differences in filling between individual cylinders. BTW, Thanks for the video, great job, as usual!
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@NextGenGamer7773 жыл бұрын
what fuel injectors did you use when using the Fast LSX r, and the Sniper 102mm?
@kevintunaley50792 жыл бұрын
I feel that was cheating the stock intake
@yatubekid3 жыл бұрын
Great test and explanations.
@TheHorsepowerMonster3 жыл бұрын
Hey, thanks a lot! And thanks for watching
@ozielplatas74723 жыл бұрын
Can any of these fit a 2017 6.2 Denali ?
@phillipjackson47343 жыл бұрын
Yup ls block
@TexasGTO3 жыл бұрын
No MSD? Odd...
@CLEEPER13 жыл бұрын
Msd dont offer an ls3 version
@subz3ro433 жыл бұрын
@@CLEEPER1 MSD works on LT engine
@CLEEPER13 жыл бұрын
@@subz3ro43 it works on all ls motors except ls3. I have one for my Ls7