It's obvious that your main concern is maintaining a 66 Book canon. Did you know that Jesus on two seperate occations and James also once quoted books outside of the accepted 66 books. Btw, Both Jesus and James when quoting those books called them " Scripture" Since Jesus Himself testifies of books outside of the 66 books, I'm gonna believe Jesus over you guys.
@notgonnatellya70575 жыл бұрын
Anonymous which ones are they? I’d love to learn more! I’ve been weeding through so many “lost books” and I’m confused
@bannybee77525 жыл бұрын
I too am wary with how they came up with the 66 books. The 1st book of Enoch is a big help for me in understanding some of the texts in the Bible
@rekaadang5 жыл бұрын
Didn't Jesus said that angels DO NOT have sex? Didn't Jesus Himself said after His ressurection, that spirit doesn't have flesh and bones? While we have angels who seduce the daughters of men, and had sex with them in the book of Enoch. I know that Jude wrote about angels who walk outside of their boundary, but this could mean the demons aka the fallen angels. In Jesus's time, there never were hybrids of angels and humans, and we have A LOT of demons and evil spirits work around. If the fallen are real, then there should exist some hybrids in Jesus's time. Because in the book of Enoch, there were hybrids. But there weren't. And MOST importantly, Jesus is the Son of Man, not Enoch.
@rekaadang5 жыл бұрын
@Nicodemus Edwards If you take the words of the Book of Enoch as truth, and do not believe in Jesus's words, then there is nothing left to talk here.
@rekaadang5 жыл бұрын
@Nicodemus Edwards Alright then.
@EarthtoSpiritWarrior5 жыл бұрын
Sheeeesh.....Thank God for the Holy Spirit, who leads to ALL Truth and Understanding. The FIRST Book of Enoch resonates as Truth in my Spirit, that is all I need.
@brucedressel88735 жыл бұрын
You are bewitched ...
@scottisnotfromhere65535 жыл бұрын
Rings true for me also. God bless.
@bp-19955 жыл бұрын
I agree, the first one feel right to me the second one does not, at least not all of it, and haven’t even listened to the third. Heard it was not very trustworthy at all
@AmericanTorah5 жыл бұрын
The heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked.
@crutherfordmusic5 жыл бұрын
5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. 6 In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. 7 Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the Lord, and depart from evil. Proverbs 3
@seapanther535 жыл бұрын
Hebrews 11:13 does not say Enoch died. I believe Enoch will experience death along with Elijah. Revelation illustrates two prophets in the end times that cannot be harmed until God allows it. I believe those two prophets are Enoch and Elijah brought back to finish their work.
@toferyo74735 жыл бұрын
That is a really interesting point you're making! Wow, never thought of that. That could very well be...
@ricoparadiso5 жыл бұрын
Was john the baptist not Elijah? how can he come back again?
@seapanther535 жыл бұрын
@@ricoparadiso I'm not exactly sure what you are asking. What we read in scripture is that John the Bapist was Jesus' cousin. He was his own man. Elijah is a completely different person. Elijah was a prophet about 850 years before Christ was born. The scriptures tell us that Elijah, like Enoch was taken by God. Those are the only two individuals in the Bible that mention being taken by God and not dying. In accordance to God's plan He will bring Elijah and Enoch back to be prophets in the end times. Revelation mentions the two prophets who can't be touched/hurt until He allows it, I just believe (because of the reasons I just mentioned) that it is Elijah and Enoch. If the "bringing them back" part seems hard to believe just remember that Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, keeping in mind that Lazarus was actually dead compared to Elijah and Enoch who didn't die.
@thejustcenturion88884 жыл бұрын
@@ricoparadiso John the Baptist was murdered by Herod, Elijah was transformed. Elijah will surely come back Mark 9:2-30 And after six days Jesus taketh with him Peter, and James, and John, and leadeth them up into an high mountain apart by themselves: and he was transfigured before them. And his raiment became shining, exceeding white as snow; so as no fuller on earth can white them. And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses: and they were talking with Jesus. And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias. For he wist not what to say; for they were sore afraid.
@thejustcenturion88884 жыл бұрын
@@seapanther53 You are very right.
@kaylavaughan95175 жыл бұрын
I don't agree that Hebrews 11:13 states that Enoch died. Hebrews 11:5 does clearly state that Enoch was taken by God, then verse 6 seems to give a breaking sentence that separates the thought, then comes back in verse 7 to continue the "by faith" segment. But I think verse 6 separates Enoch from the "all" the author bundles together in verse 13. Also, Jesus Himself quoted the Book of Enoch to the Pharisees and told them they err in not knowing the SCRIPTURES! So I really do not believe this was researched out biblically. Just my opinion. Blessings!
@thawizeman775 жыл бұрын
He has confused the Enoch from the Cain linage which is what most do when trying to contest the book of Enoch. There are 2 Enoch's & the Evil Enoch had many writings that are used to confuse the truth of GOD.
@johnbrohmanjr97195 жыл бұрын
Enoch the son of Jared lived closely with god and was taken by god, Enoch the son of Cain died. These writings are believed to be from Enoch son of Jared
@ianmcdonald86484 жыл бұрын
@Scott M Sykes Hebrews 11:5 does though. Heb 11:5 - "By faith "Enoch" was translated so as not to see death, and "was not found, because God translated him." For before his translation, he had obtained witness to have been pleasing to God." ( see Gen. 5:24 ) (LITV) "So as not to see death" - is very unambigious, that is very plain - Enoch didn't die. I personally believe he will be one of the two witnesses of Revelation 11
@k.hamilton58484 жыл бұрын
I agree, i was going to say that but its speaking more of abraham, and noah, not enoch when it says these men died... because the bible clearly states enoch did not taste death: we have to be 2 timothy 2:15 studiers! To rightly divide the Word of truth! God bless you!
@alkebul_art46905 жыл бұрын
2 Esdras 14:44 In forty days they wrote two hundred and four books. So the Bible is not 66 or 87 books, there are so many books went missing, ELOYHM/YHUH is not author of confusion but of peace, ... 2 Timothy 3:16
@mxkesotmh44875 жыл бұрын
You have to be more careful with that assumption because some books require multiple scrolls such as Isaiah, Psalms, and Enoch.
@gamegenie115 жыл бұрын
@@crutherfordmusic Show me in the American canon of 66 the verse that says to canonize 66 scrolls?
@brucedressel88735 жыл бұрын
You are a classic Bible doubter ... Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 2 Timothy 3 7 KJV
@alkebul_art46905 жыл бұрын
@@4ucmikey 🔥💥⚡👍🏿
@crutherfordmusic5 жыл бұрын
I see no reference to Enoch in Matthew. Matthew 22 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. How difficult would it be, I wonder, for the devil to twist scripture to his own ends? Is Enoch quoted in Jude, or Jude quoted in Enoch? Now the Spirit speaks expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; And I fear that as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your mind will be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. Tempting, this new knowledge is - these new books - secret until now... hidden... the new truths we now have. Don't they taste good! Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. There is only one way to the King, and it is narrow. If reading Enoch helps you get to know Jesus, good for you! But remember, no lie is of the truth.
@cmorales55 жыл бұрын
I stopped in minute 4:22 and wrote a comment. Then I began to read other comments... evidently 119 is rejecting the Book of Enoch. Big mistake. The fact is it is so suspicious to me that the Catholic-Jews Bible is 66 books..... you get my point.
@magictransistorradio49333 жыл бұрын
Catholic Jews books? The Jews only include the Old Testament. The Catholics include the apocrapha.
@narrowistheway773 жыл бұрын
Actually I’ll argue you here on just this 66 book point. There’s a good reason why Jesus arrives on the 40th book of the Protestant Bible, it’s the end of the waiting period. There’s a good reason why the New Testament is 27 books too(3x3x3, the Cube number). 66 isn’t a bad number, 666 is a bad number. That said, we agree, Enoch is originally inspired but there are errors added to the text. Most notably Chapter 22. Enoch is meant to be dissected by the Holy Spirit. Most but not all of it will pass the test. GOD Bless!
@amkr1868 ай бұрын
With all respect, your opinion about the content in the video does not come off as very trustworthy if you draw conclusions from only 4 minutes of watching and reading people's comments. Watch it first and be patient to hear them out, or else you cant form a legitimate opinion.
@cmorales58 ай бұрын
@@amkr186 I have studied the matter and sometimes you grasp the point of the author earlier. Anyway, if you don’t agree with me, it’s ok. You might someday agree if you study the matter for some hundred hours. It takes time and humility to admit that we have been deceived.
@amkr1868 ай бұрын
@@cmorales5 Yes you are right in that one can grasp a point earlier, I am sorry. I find that people arrive to very different conclusions depending on weather they derive information from the scriptures we know as the bible today or from these other sources. How come they would contradict? Those who use books like Enoch etc. will have different approaches to the appointed times and the calendar for instance. Any explanation? Do you believe the scriptures as we have them today have been altered?
@jvc89475 жыл бұрын
Sorry. You just aren’t accurate. It was quoted in the Bible and evidence suggest Jesus was familiar with it and it probably predates all the other books. Daniel even references a book that was for future believers in the end times. Enoch (through about the first 54 chapters) fits this prophecy perfectly. It was also found with the Dead Sea scrolls and new manuscript translations matched the older ones found with the scrolls.
@orangeskies55945 жыл бұрын
When were the Dead Sea Scrolls discovered?
@chicassoproductions85275 жыл бұрын
It seems that book was Revelation.
@jvc89475 жыл бұрын
Jude. Quoted in Jude. Jewish tradition supports it. One of the oldest surviving Christian Cultures (Ethiopia) and many small orthodox Christian sects still have the Book of Enoch in their cannon. Read it and it’s apparent why the Jesuits would want to remove it from modern translations.
@franklinmc44575 жыл бұрын
I believe there are sufficient evidence that warrants a more thorough examination of the evidence. To throw the writing out, is a mistake. I think we are going to find out very soon how real the Nephilim really are.
@chicassoproductions85275 жыл бұрын
@@franklinmc4457 The Nephilim were real as stated in Torah. There is no need for the book of Enoch to understand this fact. The book of Enoch is not inspired by YHVH. If you read the Torah you get enough information on giants, angels, and their interactions with men and women to be aware.
@musicbugg19804 жыл бұрын
I don’t know if this was intentional, or if 119 ministries just did not read the entire book of Enoch, but they definitely left some very important details out and falsely accused the writer of claiming to be the messiah. I took their advice literally, “test everything”. It IS my responsibility and I have come to see this teaching on Enoch inaccurate. They spoke of one section from the book of Enoch, claiming that the writer is proclaiming himself the messiah. I believe that they were referencing 1 Enoch chapter 46. I highly encourage everyone to read it for themselves. It bothers me when people make up stuff so that they can take a definitive stand. Also, the argument about when it was written or the literature style, to me does not warrant a “this is a blasphemous book” stand. Why not take the stand of “we’re not 100% sure ourselves so we say read with extreme caution.
@janmariano91974 жыл бұрын
E X A C T L Y ... i agree 100% with you
@ChristinaBiasca Жыл бұрын
I know you wrote this a long time ago, but I agree. Plus Enoch 1 was found in the Dead Sea scrolls, or at least fragments of it. Clearly it has to date earlier than these experts claim since it was found in a cave that was all dated as earlier.
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
If Jesus quoted Enoch as scripture then who is anyone who is a believer to say that Enoch is not a valid book. To say that is to say Jesus quoted from a false work. Does any believer really want to go there??? YES!!! ALL should read the work for themselves. It is a very heady work and one truly needs to know their scriptures before reading it. I've read all3 Enochian books and Book 1 is the most accurate. Books 2 and 3 are adulterated IMHO and not trustworthy. If Joshua and 2 Samuel refer to it then it should be considered a genuine work otherwise to say it's a false work is to then say the bible is promoting a false book. We all need to use a little common sense and lots of prayers asking for discernment from the Holy Spirit when reading ANY work. If I might: 1 Enoch has chapters about the 364 day calendar. THIS BOOK is the TRUE ENOCH. 2 ENoch (SLavonic) is an adulterated work which attempts (badly it does) to fit our actual solar year of 365 and 1/4 days [along with pagan Gregorian calendar months]. This is incorrect and there are other parts in it also that are suspect. 3 Enoch is more rabbinic commentary and leaves out crucial calendar info. ALSO -- [and this is just a prediction it is pointing to (YES....I'm going to say it) aliens. Chapter 33 has text: "EACH ONE WITH THREE FINGERS" Chapter 44 alludes to GRAY PEOPLE. I have copious notes for all 3 books and various copies from different translators who published. So far 1 Enoch (Ethiopian) is the correct one. I hope that helps. IMHO stay away from the other two.
@ChristinaBiasca Жыл бұрын
When does Jesus quote Enoch? I know Peter and Jude do, but we don't know if its the same version that is available through the Ethiopian church today. The parts of the book of Enoch found with the Dead Sea scrolls has some different words in it, not that it changes the meaning, but its not inerrant like the scriptures. I find Enoch useful for history and context.@@ateachableheart2649
@justinerasmus8725 Жыл бұрын
Please add verse in the bible where " book of Enoch" is quoted. Not your opinion pls. Ppl lie all the time. I trust the bible. I dont have time for ppls opinion anymore
@el_teniente81555 жыл бұрын
There were also two Enoch’s, Enoch the son of Jared is the Enoch that walked with God, not to be confused with Enoch the son of Cain
@carmineredd11984 жыл бұрын
walked with god ? I thought Jacob broke gods Achilles heel and crippled god ,so god could not possibly walk
@thorfinn64374 жыл бұрын
@@carmineredd1198 WHAT!!!! I refuse to believe that don't mix this with Greek mythology
@CrossingTheStreetArt4 жыл бұрын
Jacob wrestled with God and lost. God injured Jacob's hip and Jacob became Israel, who walked with a limp.
@bigiron75474 жыл бұрын
Alex Bailey actually both of you are wrong !! Jacob wrestled with (some believe it refers to an angel) a divine being and did so all night and when the being told him to let go, Jacob said no! Not unless you bless me. And so, the being touched his hip and broke it and said his new name is Israel because he struggled with angels and prevailed with God
@bigiron75474 жыл бұрын
carmine redd sorry buddy you got that all the backwards
@kimmasuen41074 жыл бұрын
Like Dr Michael Heiser says, just because it's not in the Bible doesn't mean it's not important. The Old testament often quotes ancient literature and other books.
@JessicaJackson-uh9mw4 жыл бұрын
I think the first 15 minutes of this video really explains the history aspect well. I appreciate that you guys didn't come out like a hard hammer for or against it, but rather explained the historical backdrop, the reason Jesus and the disciples were familiar with the text and why it is different than the rest of accepted Holy Scripture. I appreciate the time you put into this video. It is nice to come across some well-presented information in a world of heavily opinionated teachings. Keep it up.
@thegoodshepherd77773 жыл бұрын
Jude directly quotes the Book of Enoch in the New Testament. It is part of Ethiopian Canon, one of the oldest established churches. This book both elaborates on Genesis 6 and further solidifies the truth about the Earth, Sun, and Moon. I have no doubt why it was done away with.
@godloves91632 жыл бұрын
Not really. Enoch for sure isn’t inspired. Unless you believe that human kind can bring forth with the angel kinds. Can humans also bring forth of the gorilla kind, horse and other animals?!
@zariahlafleurpowell70282 жыл бұрын
@@godloves9163 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
@godloves91632 жыл бұрын
@@zariahlafleurpowell7028 what’s your point? Sons of God are referring to as believers in God. Yes angels at some times have been referred to as sons of God, however, the New Testament is clear that angels CANNOT REPRODUCE and ARE NOT HUMAN 👉KIND👈. The Bible is clear that each kind can bring forth after THEIR OWN KIND. Is the angel kind the same as human kind?
@zariahlafleurpowell70282 жыл бұрын
@@godloves9163 no in fact there are different kinds of angles sons God is a family in Genisis it says let us make man in Our image. The arch Angel's are indeed sons of God arch over seer of the Angel's watchers of the Angels. Genisis 6 is a part of the bible that talks about the sons of God not humans at this point who hadn't been called into the God family yet. May God bless your study I'm just sharing what I've found it's ok if we believe different in our journeys to the one truth that God alone knows fully
@godloves91632 жыл бұрын
@@zariahlafleurpowell7028 I did my research as well. People only imply it’s angels. Sorry it’s not spiritual angels, it’s either fleshly or not. There’s no hybrids. And yes there were giants in those days. Most of everything was giant, that’s the point. Genesis is showing the proof of giants because this is what our archeologists find today and can’t explain it except through the Bible lens. Giant reptiles aka dinosaurs, giant animals, giant insects. Hence why the bible says there were giants on the earth in those days.
@jennettwheat5565 жыл бұрын
I,v learn so much from the book of Enoch how wonderful to know how God created each thing in time and how it has blessed me I am amazed at all the things I,v learned knowing God power and how amazing he is
@sollos20014 жыл бұрын
Where can find the book of Enoch?
@abrensiatoppo45284 жыл бұрын
@@sollos2001 you can download it from the playstore.
@amandacasabella8962 жыл бұрын
guys just note that the book of Enoch says that he , Enoch, is the son of man, 99% truth can be 100% a deception, be careful
@your_name_here21582 жыл бұрын
Amen!
@your_name_here21582 жыл бұрын
The God Culture has a testing Enoch series wherein he DEFENDS it unlike 119 did here
@premiercastlerealtyllc22183 жыл бұрын
If the book of Jasher was not scriptural, why would the book be mentioned in two very distinct places in the gospels? First mentioned in Joshua 10:13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven and hasted not to go down about a whole day. and then again, it is made mention in 2Samuel 1:18. (Also he bade them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow: behold, it is written in the book of Jasher.)
@christenduckett5 жыл бұрын
If Enoch was with God then he could have seen what happened at mt Sinai. Am I correct! God knows all things and angels can see from above so how is that not true too.
@CrossingTheStreetArt4 жыл бұрын
Yes! the first section of 1 Enoch describes God showing himself to the people of Israel at Sinai and it describes the covenant that God made with his people and declares that God keeps that same covenant. The rest of the bible agrees and shows time after time how God keeps those same promises with his people.
@tendernessforthemonster45174 жыл бұрын
They are so bias they erased my comment because I challenged them and I was not inappropriate in anyway they are like Facebook fact checkers, very sad, they are not genuinely interested in the validity or not of the book of Enoch they are just trying to wash their hands so they don’t lose any reputation by endorsing it in anyway
@soloscriptura74513 жыл бұрын
Enoch was not an angel. The Bible never states that Enoch went to Heaven, just that he was saved from death. If you believe scripture, Yeshua says specifically: John 3:13 “No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man.” This verse should shut all discussion down about the topic of Heaven. Elijah was transported to another place, we know this because he sends a letter to Jehoram. All of the prophets talk about going to sleep in the dust, nothing mentioning going to heaven and looking down on the sorrows of this world or being an angel. David is said to be “sleeping with his fathers” it mentions nothing of going to heaven.
@zjmtnvols3 жыл бұрын
@@soloscriptura7451 Did not Jesus tell the thief on the cross, "Today thou shalt be with me in paradise?" Is not paradise heaven? So in other words, Jesus told the thief he would be WITH JESUS in paradise.
@soloscriptura74513 жыл бұрын
@@zjmtnvols nothing in scripture indicates that he went to Heaven. He was telling him he was redeemed for believing in him, therefore the law of sin and death does not apply to him. I’ll pay you to show me anywhere in scripture it says “such in such is in Heaven” besides Yeshua. You won’t find it, because it’s not there. Shalom.
@hulky3334 жыл бұрын
God Bless to all Book of Enoch believers. I wish that somebody will open a church that will actually teach and preach about the Book Of Enoch.😊
@archcast55503 жыл бұрын
There is nothing to teach it is all laid out clearly , anyone can read Enoch nowadays. But still they chose their own understanding and wisdom.
@april_thomas2 жыл бұрын
Shalom! Check out Parable of the Vineyard comprehensive Enoch study on KZbin. 😊
@justinerasmus8725 Жыл бұрын
So the bible is not enough.....
@hulky333 Жыл бұрын
@@justinerasmus8725 Of course! But the Book of Enoch is part of the Bible
@Siammarcus5 жыл бұрын
Praise Yah!!! It is a blessing to see so many individuals in the comment section dedicated to doing their own research and not just except the regurgitated talking points of uninformed men.
@Hosea3_19923 жыл бұрын
God is so good I felt this in my spirit praise yeshua
@HajiStaxGaming3 жыл бұрын
It’s simple to read the book of Enoch and prove it’s not valid. Easy question: Who deceived Eve? The Bible says Lucifer…book of enoch says an angel named Gadriel… So which one do you believe?
@ZetaMagnus3 жыл бұрын
@@HajiStaxGaming First off, the Bible doesn't say Lucifer in reference to Satan. The only place where Lucifer appears is Isaiah 14:12 and the name means Light-Bringer and in this verse refers to King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. And it never even says Satan in reference to the Serpent; the Serpent is merely the Serpent.
@HajiStaxGaming3 жыл бұрын
@@ZetaMagnus Revelation 12:9 “And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” Weird….I got this right out of Revelation. Maybe you should re-read it. Literally says, “that old serpent, called the Devil, AND Satan.”. So….please explain to me in greater detail how the serpent is merely the serpent but not called Satan.
@justinerasmus8725 Жыл бұрын
@@ZetaMagnusyou must read your bible more carefully brother. You missing alot
@word2thewise4475 жыл бұрын
Jude is included in the Bible, he spoke of Enoch he wasn’t mocked for it. After, Paul spoke Enoch to the Jews in Hebrews He was inspired by the Lord. Are we to say we can’t trust Paul writing that Enoch was translated?? Yet these are saying they trust some scholar instead??? Or doctrines of men? Are we not to test all things with the Bible? Would their not be warnings against trusting in Enoch or maybe just not mentioned at all? I have seen other videos on this ch. & am seeing the same pattern of choosing scripture to their interpretation and making it sound like there is no way to think otherwise than what they are presenting. DANGEROUS! BEWARE & BE AWARE!!
@spiritualtruth13545 жыл бұрын
That's why the bible says the Holy Spirit well lead you in all truth,!! Not intellectualism will lead you into all truth read flag number one!!
@word2thewise4475 жыл бұрын
Spiritual truth i think this is literally just a rouse to bring out the anger and evil these guys cant be this serious. They test nothing and are taught these things and cant re kearn their way around it i have tried to talk to these kind of channels with the same end everytime they speak their brliefs and refuse or spiritually are blind to it and until they come to Jesus they will stay this way. I try to speak to other channels and go back and forth on scripture and i always end up amazed they will not hear what the scripture says. I hope that if nothing else it plants the Seed
@Hebrew42Day4 жыл бұрын
Well they also say adults would eventually become circumcised, completely obliterating what Paul warns in Galatians. However- Jew and Gentile are to become one flesh. Worship on the same days, set apart by God, and eat the same foods, not grieving one another. The Spirit will lead to all truth, and the Spirit will lead to Torah and how God always wanted to circumcise our hearts.
@word2thewise4474 жыл бұрын
Elwood M. Buel well what is required of gentiles in the Torah and what was taken away with Jesus. Like the feasts did anyone get Leaven out of their house and have perfect unspotted lamb for dinner and make sure that none of it remain in the morning. Or is Jesus the Perfect Lamb that and to celebrate it would just be remembering our sins yr to year that can never be judged by food or feast say. 🙏🏼Romans 6:6knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, so that the body of sin might be annulled, that we are no longer enslaved to sin. 7For the one having died has been freed from sin. 8Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with Him, 9knowing that Christ, having been raised up out from the dead, dies no more. Death no longer rules over Him. 10For that which He died, He died to sin once for all; but that which He lives, He lives to God. 11So also you, consider yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but living to God in Christ Jesus. 🙏🏼👉this is the Berean Literal which matches to original greek best. Notice the term “old man” this is also the same reference as the Parable of the Wineskins. Which is about the Old & New Covenants. Which is also in the story of the Wedding where Jesus turned water to wine and that He Brings the Good Wine now. Sorry this is long but since Christ.Truther and Parable of th Vine. Blocked me and my second ch. The people will choose their own paths. And if they believe they have hidden truths the all will fall into the ditch. As for the Torah one easy Scripture answers that John 6: 28Therefore they said to Him, “What must we do, that we may be doing the works of God?” 29Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you should believe in Him whom He has sent.” 🙏🏼this is also why it is important to have Faith in Salvation where if you are bringing the Gospel the Torah is not there. Why a man can accept Jesus in his death bed seconds before his death. Hiw can one be saved in this manner with the Torah? Seek truth in the New Covenant and you will find it
@GamingandFrightened3 жыл бұрын
The Bible also quotes various non Christians. Should they be considered doctrine too then by your logic
@deannasellinger84304 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate your review on the books of Enoch, Jubilee and Jasher. If I had read them before listening to your testing, I would have read them in error. I would have believed them to be valid, I appreciate how you use the Canon of God's scripture as your ultimate authority. Thank you for testing The book of Enoch may God bless you. Shalom!
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!!! TEST the books for yourself but be forewarned! You had better know your bible inside and out FIRST. THATY is the ONLY WAY to test those written works and they have MERIT. SHAME on anyone who says otherwise becaue in their railings of false works, they ERR and expose themselves as untrustworthy.
@robertomendez15475 жыл бұрын
"Matthew 22:29 Jesus answered and said to them, “You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven" the only book talking about angel not given in marriage is enoch
@richardwhite60625 жыл бұрын
But the one point I would say is that those are Angel's which are in heaven. Not fallen Angel's who desecrate themselves with man.
@TheEldash5 жыл бұрын
@@richardwhite6062 Well stated. The key statement is "but are like angels "in" heaven. Not the ones that got cast down to earth because of rebellion. This group is obviously going again the most high.
@named1614 жыл бұрын
The people above made my point. But they are right, the angels left heaven and defiled themselves with women. In Matthew, they are "in" heaven.
@named1614 жыл бұрын
Also, read Genesis Chapter 6. Nephalim=Giants
@nickmansfield12 жыл бұрын
And Yeshua is the antithesis of the Nephilim, even though he too came down from the sky.
@TazHall2 жыл бұрын
I personally think every mature believer grounded in Scripture should read Enoch prayerfully. I have benefited greatly from it in my understanding of Genesis. It has also changed the way I view world history and the history of God's people. It goes into detail about what the fallen angels were doing and how genetic mad science and sorcery was introduced to mankind. It also gives more context as to why we have all of these same creatures showing up in mythology and lore all across the globe; things like mermaids, dragons, giants, goblins, minotaurs, fairies, centaurs, werewolves, shapeshifters, bigfoot, UFOs and aliens. All these creatures trace their origins back to some kind of supernatural source which we know as the fallen angels who wanted to create their own reality on earth in rebellion to God. As it was in the days of Noah so shall it be in the days of the coming of the son of man. The reason why I believe what Enoch says is because I am seeing the same things come back nowadays, the way people are playing with genetics and even the human soul. And the way sorcery and all kinds of demonic doctrines are coming more to the forefront and even being taught to children in schools. The way the basics of natural order like gender is being rejected in favor of creating our own false realities, that means we can have sex with anything and everything just like the people did before the flood. This opens the door to sex with demons which will create all kinds of problems. I believe these extra details presented in Enoch will help protect God's people even more from deception because we have a better idea of what to look out for.
@ljsultan2292 жыл бұрын
Very well said.
@TazHall Жыл бұрын
@@ljsultan229 thank you, God bless
@elenascott08110 ай бұрын
I also believe that enoch should be studied
@diane56955 жыл бұрын
Love your work, however this presentation was troublesome to me... Did Jesus use terms found in Enoch in referring to himself? Is Enoch an end time prophet? Why did you choose the translation you sourced? Did the Essene Community become the first Christians? You presented hypothesis and assumptions based on only one side of the narrative. It would be extremely interesting to have you present an opposite view citing different sources or to have a yeshiva style debate that would allow the listeners to determine their own conclusions.
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
Diane Essenes were pagan. It’s frustrating how people rewrite history. That’s like saying whites were the first Americans. They were not. Nowhere in Dead Sea Scrolls are Essenes mentioned. This guy is a typical false teacher who panders to Juda-ism religion and x-tian religion also. The actual “early Christians” or assembly never doubted or rejected Enoch. It was not until the 5th century CE. Rome rejected it and pseudo (protesting) Romans do also, except for some people who identify as x-titans. More people are realizing Enoch is Scripture and the historical and prophetic implications.
@yahuahyahusha3645 жыл бұрын
Pm פיטרוש מיכאל talking like that will get the comments section turned off on this video 🤫 😂😂
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
YAHUAH YAHUSHA Fine. Then he can lose viewers and money...He is a false teacher.
@yahuahyahusha3645 жыл бұрын
Pm פיטרוש מיכאל it wasn’t always like this, seems like there was a recent change to the crap they have been putting out lately.
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
Paul kept the Sabbath Acts 18:4 It does not say that and is that you? Go preach in a church and not here ok.
@user-dy7ce2bb9d5 жыл бұрын
What Jesus says in Matthew 22:30 can only be found in 1 Enoch. Please refer to verse 29. And Jude alludes to 1 Enoch many times before directly quoting it, but you'd have to study "all scripture" (including 1 Enoch) to know that.
@godloves91632 жыл бұрын
Quoting another book doesn’t make it scriptures. Unless you believe all the other secular books the Bible quoted are scripture?
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
@@godloves9163 But my friend....JESUS SAID IT!!! Of course I know, that means nothing if you don't belong to Him.
@godloves9163 Жыл бұрын
@@ateachableheart2649 Jesus also quoted other unbiblical sources. Does that mean those need to be included in the Bible? Secondly, the book of Enoch was a fake and how do you know it wasn’t written after claiming to be written before and then quoting Jesus…
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
@@godloves9163 Jesus IS LORD. For anyone who says otherwise by saying He quoted unbiblical sources is tantamount to blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Jesus had something to say about that. RU sure you wanna go there? I think you're a shill, certainly NOT a true follower of Christ Jesus.
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
@@godloves9163 please cite the source of information that proves Enoch is a fake book. NO ONE can prove that and even if they could, then that makes Jesus a fake and there my friend you tread on dangerous ground.
@deelove84135 жыл бұрын
It was a bunch of men that got together and decided what when into the bible we use today. People there are many Books ....
@DanEslofАй бұрын
not at all answer to this choose to see new comments
@Cherub725 жыл бұрын
Took me a few days to watch. I wanted to write a few things. You're clearly missing something if you're saying it was revealed to a select few... It's a book for all eyes to see, in the end times. This isn't gold plates with special glasses requirements, this is a printed distributed book. All Jews knew about it back then before the diaspora, not just a select few. How was it exclusive? You mean the elect? You gloss over many facts here as well. It's hard to write a paragraph about a 45 minute video but you saying in Jude they quote Enoch, then read the contexts which says "Enoch prophesied" then say it's not inspired. I mean think about that statement you make here. You're saying it's prophesy but not to be regarded as scripture? Do you ignore some prophets? Do you teach people to ignore the prophets? If what you say is true then Jude can not be trusted because of the false testimony here claiming Enoch is a prophet. Even if it was passed down orally then why do you think writing it would be any less true? The Brit Hadashah states clearly Enoch prophesied which means we must listen or disregard the book of Jude as well. Ignore Enoch to your own peril, it was written for our time. It emerged as Israel became a nation in day and the dead sea scrolls were found at the same time. give or take a couple months, it is significant evidence. Also if what you say is true and it's an oral tradition then you just opened up a can of talmudic worms because if that oral tradition made it into the Brit Hadashah then ALL of it must be considered. The way you steer the conversation is odd too with out reference. And don't get me started on your lame translation, did you purposely chose one that said "myriads" instead of 10 thousand to steer even more? Mine says 10 thousand not myriads. Even the first Enoch link in google shows 10 thousand, not myriad. The one quote from Michael Hesier is just an opinion also, no fact here. He is assuming something. This how you get led away. Jude plainly says it is prophesy, not a false doctrine. Is Michael Hesier your new Paul or is Jude enough? If you're going to question whether all of Enoch is trustworthy then you must do the same with the Brit Hadashah big time. The catholic fingerprints are disgusting in it. Entire lines are missing from the gospels, the lines with deep meaning. We walk around half blind trying to make sense of it all. It seems like your biggest problem with the Book of Enoch is that there are people who are chosen, the elect. Well I hate to break it to you but the Elect are real. Yeshua called me his Elect one day himself with his own mouth. Why would he break his silence on a day when I was not praying or doing anything religious just to say that if it wasn't important? Just working in my house, why would he break his silence to call me his elect? He told me he loves me, and I am his, he also told me to get ready. Not all are elect though so I will say that now so you don't call anyone who accepts Yeshua elect. Is that what you mean when you say it was for a select few? That book spells everyone out, the elect which always have Shalom with Abba, the righteous, who work for that same Shalom and the wicked who deny him and his ways. I don't mean literal work for the righteous, maybe accepting Yeshua and keeping the commandments is the "work" here. The righteous are those who do the will of God. The elect are not just anyone who believes but are selected for some reason. That has not been revealed. I do have prophetic dreams though. In one dream I watched a circle appear in the sky and angels poured out of it. People were screaming so loud. One angel flew to me and grabbed me and I woke up. Keep the commandments, keep the testimony of Yeshua, seek our fathers face. There is no greater reward!
@Cherub725 жыл бұрын
PS Son of Man is Ben Adam. Son of Adam. We are all Son of Man.
@tendernessforthemonster45174 жыл бұрын
Exactly right brother here in this video they are very biased against the book of Enoch they have a lot to lose in their reputation if they appear to endorse it same with Michael Heizer a lot of times he washes his hands, I like your point about Jude and like timothy Alberino says if Jude said that Enoch prophesied and the Bible says that Christ is the spirit of prophecy therefore the spirit of Christ must be in the book of Enoch . When they say in this video that the angels said you are the son of man they are totally unfairly forcing the interpretation that Enoch is the Messiah instead of Jesus hilarious and unfair the book of Enoch is completely messianic about a Messiah in the future he gives glory to Jesus Christ there is no contradiction to any biblical doctrine they even erased one of my comments acting like Facebook fact checkers and I was not inappropriate in anyway I simply challenged them . A lot of us know that if we truly pay attention and we make our spiritual ears sensitive to what’s going on behind curtains in this world we realized that the book of Enoch makes a lot of sense with all this pseudoscience lies that Satan is engineering for the system of the antichrist.
@thegametower3 жыл бұрын
Cherub, if you dont mind me asking, and this is in the context of knowing why you are elect, are or were you ever married?
@ervinhart15113 жыл бұрын
AMEN
@AGreaterAmerica5 жыл бұрын
I thank God that ancient B.C. scholars compiled the writings of Enoch and made them available in one concise document. Together, they give us a much better understanding of events that took place BEFORE the Great Flood... plus much more, of course. It is not relevant whether it is included in the "canon" or not. What is important is that we have available to us a greater understand of God's work that He has preserved for us over the centuries. "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth." The Book of Enoch is NOT a DIFFERENT truth, it only brings to light MORE understanding of the Scriptures. I thank God for that.
@mattyice30365 жыл бұрын
When 119 is confident they know something, they block comments on their videos. When they question themselves, they open up the comments section to allow people to change their minds. This video is great evidence of that. And 119 ministries is very wrong on this video. The book of Enoch is very accurate.
@jessicamatlock67865 жыл бұрын
This man is pissing me off comparing the Book of Enoch to the wizard of Oz
@jessicamatlock67865 жыл бұрын
Enoch walked with Yahweh and Enoch walked for 365 year of age. Enoch didn't die Yahweh took Enoch to heaven.
@jessicamatlock67865 жыл бұрын
He needs to read the Bible and the book of Enoch again
@mattyice30365 жыл бұрын
@@jessicamatlock6786 If what you say is true, then Jesus was a false Messiah. Jesus said in John 3:13 "No man ascendeth up to heaven, but he who came down from heaven". Jesus was the one who came down from heaven, therefore NO OTHER MAN can ascend into heaven, except Jesus. This either proves you to be wrong in your Enoch interpretation, or it proves Jesus to be a liar and a false Messiah. Which one do you think is most likely? Scripture actually uses the word "translated" and not "taken" to describe what happened to Enoch. Enoch was translated to heaven. Heaven is a spiritual relm NOT A FLESHLY relm for men. Its very clear Enoch was "translated" into the spirit in order to be taken into heaven. Your mistranslation has turned Jesus into a liar.
@terrencenondo80955 жыл бұрын
@@mattyice3036 prophet Elijah ascended to heaven also.
@jeffsr22225 жыл бұрын
the book of Enoch is one of the scriptures which was meant for the end times only the wise will understand it not the foolish. This guy did not do enough research he listens the words of men then rely on the Holy Spirit.The book of Enoch is the word of G-D. The earth is flat just as it says do not listen to man who obey satan the evil one.He is the great deceiver who deceives the whole earth.May Yeshua guide and bless all who read His word, Amen
@berylackermann82405 жыл бұрын
I have to disagree with you on this one jeffsr2222
@brucedressel88735 жыл бұрын
You must be real wise then ... Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Romans 1 22 KJV
@brucedressel88735 жыл бұрын
You are bewitched by the synagogue of satan
@spicysmurf695 жыл бұрын
@@brucedressel8873 putting words in his mouth? He didn't profess himself to be wise.
@debbiemartin78175 жыл бұрын
Enoch is NOT the Messiah!
@jacobusvandermerwe19225 жыл бұрын
What I find astounding is that people don't have any spiritual discernment . In the New testament Jesus teaches us about demons. The book of Enosh explains where the demons came from. Most the books in the new testament contain word for word references from the book of Enosh.
@spitflamez5 жыл бұрын
Jacobus Van der Merwe I really can say, I didn’t understand the difference between demons and fallen angels until reading Enoch. Demons come from dead Nephilim. Even one of the words used for demons is also talking about Nephilim, the Rephaim. I asked a guy from Israel, “what is a Rephaim?” He said demon, although in the Bible the first appear as Giants, then later as demons and the inhabitants of the underworld.
@jacobusvandermerwe19225 жыл бұрын
@@spitflamez yes the angels had sex with the daughters of men and their offspring were giants. When these giants died because they were born on the earth they became demonic spirits. The original 200 angels that decided to cohabit with woman are bound till judgement day.
@tonyt56095 жыл бұрын
@@jacobusvandermerwe1922 Regarding Enoch, some doubters get caught up on certain words and passages in Enoch, just like in Jubilees and Jasher. They get too caught up on things that appear out of line or incorrect and start assuming the entire book is false or something. People who do that are not understanding by the spirit, instead, they may gain some understanding then listen to "scholars" who have there own agenda to debunk the text, then this cycle continues on and on. Jesus will soon make things clear to all.
@kervinrobinkneshoa72135 жыл бұрын
Demons are evil spirits not angels
@jacobusvandermerwe19225 жыл бұрын
@@kervinrobinkneshoa7213 the book of Enoch explains this the angels that sinned in Genius 6 took daughters of men and slept with them their children became giants. When these giants were killed they became demons or evil spirits. They were told to remain on earth as they were made on the earth
@battmannt5 жыл бұрын
I am trying to be like the Bereans here, so here is my question: @5:18 you give 2 proofs against Enoch being the author, they both have to do with TIME. The Time of Enochs life. Since he was taken to be with God while he was yet alive, and since a day and a thousand years can be the same for Our Father, how can we know what time span or spans Enoch spent with Our Father in Heaven? How can we know WHEN he returned, and if he did die, how can we determine the date of his death without those other factors?
@childchild25874 жыл бұрын
I dont mean to be critical. But they way he coming on this...it remind me of something harold camping would say. Plus its super confusing. WITH ALL THIS INFORMATION. THERE IS NO REVELATION HERE. JESUS HELPS US. THEOLIGIZED AT BEST. LOCKED OUT. MY WHOLE SPIRIT WAS LIKE BEEP! BEEP! BEEP! Wrong Wrong Wrong. In a world full of information craving we are starving for wisdom from the Lord. Christ came in the flesh.
@saulravenhudson58735 жыл бұрын
Apostle Jude is a reliable man of Christ and of The Father in Heaven. He clearly mentioned "Enoch Seventh from Adam". It is at his precise words when he quoted (Jude 1:14-15) verse from the Book of Enoch (1:9) both are parallel. This is full well enough Enoch's scripture was indeed inspired. Jude knew it, and hypocrites don't.
@Chris-qg8ss2 ай бұрын
Grow up and dig a little deeper to understand the full picture. Listen to the entire video and read some entire articles ok this topic. You are just cherry picking and ignoring what you don't like. YOU are the hypocrite.
@DanEslofАй бұрын
everyone all answer to this choose to see new comments
@AGreaterAmerica5 жыл бұрын
At 9:39 he seems concerned that we may not have an accurate representation of The Book of Enock as it was in the First Century. On that basis, we would have to conclude the same about the Canon... a foolish statement, as we must trust that God has protected ALL that he has passed on to mankind. Since we know that God DID reveal things to Enoch, we can be SURE that He had protected THAT word as well. Because Enoch struggled to describe things seen in his "vision(s)", is that any different than John's visions in the book of Revelation? John only shared what he saw. We trust the Holy Spirit to reveal what God was REALLY saying. Just saying...
@holychildofgod37785 жыл бұрын
some chapters are missing in the book of Enoch, go scroll through it.
@patriciapinnock39203 жыл бұрын
All i can say is the book of enoch makes me change my life totally,when i read how enoch petition for the fallen angels and God rejected all 200,it teaches me that we take Sin too lightly and think that as we say Lord forgive us we are forgiven,i cried ,i got scared,these now a days pastors only interested in money,they don't preach hell and holiness
@bufficliff8978 Жыл бұрын
You can get the same moral from the canon Bible.
@cruise0405able2 жыл бұрын
The mention that Enoch did die later Hebrews 11:13 is taken way out of context. Read Hebrews 11:5-13 again for clarification. It’s talking about the people after Enoch that died, not Enoch himself.
@jdub71015 жыл бұрын
119 failed to test Enoch properly.
@scottisnotfromhere65535 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@HangingOnHisWords5 жыл бұрын
YEP!
@narib22575 жыл бұрын
Agreed, just like what he said Enoch died in Hebrews 11:13. I didn’t read as such that Enoch died ...maybe they had other interpretations that I don’t understand?
@bryanhurd17725 жыл бұрын
It was found with the dead sea scrolls.
@brucedressel88735 жыл бұрын
Or way more accurately called Gnostic desert discards ...
@austinpalmer41545 жыл бұрын
yeah this 119 ministries dude is a false teacher. pretty foolish
@austinpalmer41545 жыл бұрын
he has zero original thoughts he uses other authors to discredit and describe texts in the best way he thinks/assumes. I cant take him seriously at all
@austinpalmer41545 жыл бұрын
@@brucedressel8873 🤣 you're a fool. and have fallen for the beast system aka Roman Central Currency through the Vatican and they couldn't do anything because the Dead Sea scrolls were hidden for a reason
@geoant98025 жыл бұрын
all kinds of writings were also found with the biblical scriptures. This does not prove or disprove Enoch as canon.
@gravityfallscanada5 жыл бұрын
I don't want to spam the comment section, but I do have another question. When Jesus reprimanded the Pharisees in Matthew chapter 22 verse 29 and 30 saying _29 Jesus answered and said unto them, _*_Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures,_*_ nor the power of God._ _30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven._ What scriptures is Yeshua referring to? There is no where eles in the Bible explaining this, however the Book of Enoch *does* give us an explanation. I am not dogmatically saying that the Book of Enoch is Canon because of this one oversight however this definitely leads me to believe that the words of God have been perhapes tampered with...
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
Gravity Falls Canada Yep. That’s Enoch 15. The Sadducee, not Pharisee attempted to debunk the resurrection by using Tobit. Yahusha rebutted by using Enoch.
@gravityfallscanada5 жыл бұрын
@@pm5206 Ah, thank you for the correction. Do you have the chapter in the book of Tobit that talks about this?
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
Gravity Falls Canada Tobit 3:8.
@archcast55505 жыл бұрын
2 ''And go, say to the watchers of the shamayim who have sent you to intercede for them, 'You should intercede for men, and not men for you. 3 'Why have you left the high, qodesh, and eternal shamayim, and lain with women, and defiled yourselves with the daughters of men and taken to yourselves wives, and done like the children of earth, and begotten giants as sons? 4 'And though you were qodesh, spiritual, living the eternal hai, you have defiled yourselves with the blood of women, and have brought forth with the blood of flesh, and, as the children of men, have lusted after flesh and blood, as those also do who die and perish.
@rosemarymarsh43225 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing this.I personally found this very long and a lot to take in all in one go. I Believe in The Heavenly Father And In Jesus Christ and The Holy. Spirit.I do Believe Enoch and need to study this for myself with the Help of The Holy Spirit. Amen.
@ronmower36945 жыл бұрын
Well said..uts all we need to do..take in everything, dismiss all religious dogmatic religions..go to our lord Jesus CHRIST only,,rinse repeat..to our lord for holy discernment!
@jessicabates12234 жыл бұрын
The book of enoch does not lead to the teachings of Jesus Christ so there is no Truth , way or life there for you.
@zoegrace10313 жыл бұрын
The book of Enoch exposes the lies of Satan. The satanists could not control the whole earth through fear, if the people of the Earth depend on Yehovah. They had to come up with lies about Yehovah's creation and how insignificant mankind is. For this, first they got rid of Yehovah's witness in the Book of Enoch. Then they started the propaganda mechanism with NASA, Media and Pseudo Science. Pray to Yehovah to remove the scales over our eyes created by false propaganda, so that we can understand the truth. And the truth shall set us free from the evil clutch of satan.
@godloves91632 жыл бұрын
@@zoegrace1031 explain to me how satellites work and weather satellites etc. Please don’t start with the flat earth ignorance.
@johnbreitmeier3268 Жыл бұрын
@@zoegrace1031 The Book of Enoch IS mostly the Lies of Satan. None of it is useful history of what happened before the Flood.
@billysunerson Жыл бұрын
Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of latter-day Saints don't accept the books Enoch as canon. We do however have additional scriptures about him, but not derived from the apocrypha. Moroni is pronounced Mor-OH-nye, btw.
@JaredMcDougall Жыл бұрын
I confirm the Book of Enoch is NOT cannon and is considered apocryphal. Also, we are NOT an " end times community" any more than other deciples Jesus Christ.
@PolarisStanley5 жыл бұрын
Enoch was God’s first scribe. He is also 1 of 2 men to go be with God without knowing death. What more authoritative do you need than that?
@warren88olen374 жыл бұрын
That is Enoch, the question is did he write the book of Enoch?
@douglasmaiden685 жыл бұрын
The 3 books of Enoch are extraordinary!
@LuminousTwinHearts2 жыл бұрын
@@gravityfallscanada how?
@gravityfallscanada2 жыл бұрын
@@LuminousTwinHearts I retract my statement. After 2 years of research I have concluded that all three books of Enoch are scripturally based and are the first three of the 360 books that he wrote.
@Playsitloud15 жыл бұрын
We can jump around all day but only one verse matters here. 2 Timothy verses 16-17 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness"
@braggphillips96485 жыл бұрын
Up until now I thought 119ministries was pretty knowledgeable smh.....bad research or maybe they needed something to put up quick.
@valentinbasha71175 жыл бұрын
It takes time no
@tendernessforthemonster45174 жыл бұрын
Very bias and they just simply don’t believe, they just analyze superficially, all Christian “leaders” have a lot to loose if they more than endorse Enoch, however in the book there is a wealth of knowledge and revelation that doesn not contradict doctrine.
@micvili75275 жыл бұрын
Well it is quoted by Jude & without it we dont have a full account for the Gen 6 fallen watcher discrepancie or the scape goat Aza'zel as all sin was to be ascribed to him. What say you good sir ? Have you an account for these things ?
@micvili75275 жыл бұрын
However i would not say the book of enoch is the inspired word of Yahua
@cohencyrus53375 жыл бұрын
what disturbs me is that, this book existed in the bible earlier on ..so by then the book was inspired by God..but 200 years later, why say it's not inspired by God ..
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
cohen cyrus Exactly. It’s man made religious bs as I call it. Evidence, which is required and two witnesses agree that Enoch, Jubilees for example are in two ancient Scripture versions. Dead Sea Scrolls and Ethiopian version. We have historians who said that those two books were Scripture. Pharisees and Rome eventually rejected them because it is pro Torah and Messianic. It goes against their religion. If people want to reject Enoch, Jubilees, then to be consistent, they should reject NT. I don’t recommend that. People should be consistent and stop cherry picking and trust in false scholars that reject Scripture entirely and then accept some of Scripture and contradicting themselves. Here is something fro you to think about. Yahudah (Jude) 1:6 quotes a passage from the Testament (assumption) of Mosheh (Moses). Should we reject Jude? I think not. I don’t get why supposed defenders of Scripture want to reject parts of Scripture but not reject letters. Letters are NOT technically the Scriptures. Yes, they quote and allude to the Scriptures. See how messed up religion is and the true adherents to Scripture are attacked the most.
@cohencyrus53375 жыл бұрын
@@pm5206 thanks bro
@zoegrace10313 жыл бұрын
They removed because they wanted to introduce NASA
@robindickinson80253 жыл бұрын
The wizard of OZ! Jude says that Enoch propesized. Paul definitely believed that Enoch was taken up! You act like the book is easily, matter of factly discredited then you go waaaaay out there. Why?
@metalmedic72115 жыл бұрын
brother the book of Enoch is for us in the end days possibly sealed and give to daniel
@scottisnotfromhere65535 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@RedPill777775 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@warren88olen375 жыл бұрын
Then why was it around for so long???
@Israel-of-Yah4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. It's been reserved for the last days
@warren88olen374 жыл бұрын
@@Israel-of-Yah Dead sea scolls had fragments, that doesn't sound very well preserved.
@saludanite5 жыл бұрын
Interestingly, the Book of Enoch was quoted by all the apostles in the NT. If that weren't enough, Jesus quotes it without hesitation, including calling Himself the Son of Man time after time, just as Enoch speaks of Him, time after time, in his book.
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
Book of Ezekiel also, 92 times I think you'll find "son of man" addressed to Ezekiel.
@newfound_adventures5 жыл бұрын
Hmmm. Wonder why Jude and the Holy Spirit come to polar opposite conclusions than you? Am I to believe you before the Holy Spirit.
@newfound_adventures5 жыл бұрын
@@ravenstone366 Interesting indeed.
@newfound_adventures5 жыл бұрын
@@ravenstone366 Tertullian the Latin historian makes it clear why Sadducees didn't allow Enoch and the New Testament into the Jewish canon. Because both Enoch and the New Testament were too Christ Centric. Too many people were getting saved after reading them.
@newfound_adventures5 жыл бұрын
@@ravenstone366 As for the Christian Canon we can all thank The Council of Laodecia and St Augustine. Laodecia rejected Revelation and Enoch from the Canon. St Augustine with Hippo and Carthrage reinstated Revelation back into the Canon. But Enoch wasn't reinserted because Augustine doubted the Genesis 6 accounts. Despite being historically affirmed Augustine's faith wasn't strong enough.
@newfound_adventures5 жыл бұрын
@@ravenstone366 hope that helps. Love you in Christ.
@rickdavis22355 жыл бұрын
Newfound Aventures Hmmmm. Why would you throw away thousands of years of history written by many different authors, speaking many different languages, coming from all walks of life but all telling the same story for a book that contradicts all of that history? Perhaps you don't really know the history of our Bible, how it came about, why it came about and when or how it was transcribed, how it was treated, the different of materials used for ancient manuscripts and scrolls, how meticulous the scribes were during transcription and how they prided themselves on accuracy, who decided what books were in the Bible and which books weren't and why.
@spiritmatrix20045 жыл бұрын
so the book being prophetically consistent makes it falsely attributed? ...right
@corystajduhar5 жыл бұрын
It contradicts Jesus being the Messiah/Son of Man/Savior 22:58.
@larrybarnett90465 жыл бұрын
Question everything, and do not let the hyper-religious self proclaimed gurus sway your love for Jesus. Jesus hates religion
@ricoparadiso5 жыл бұрын
You are going to lead yourself into deception trying to challenge Gods Word by adding falsehoods
@k.hamilton58484 жыл бұрын
Jesus does not hate religion my friend, read the book of James : "Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world." James 1:27 (kjv) God bless you brother
@k.hamilton58484 жыл бұрын
(Ps: God does hate wickedness and deception, which is what FALSE religions are, there is only one true religion because there is only one true God 😁) have a blessed weekend!
@armorvestrus41194 жыл бұрын
Jude 1:14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints," how do you thank Jude and others got this information if they had not read the Book of Enoch? Beware what you speak against Enoch seeing he was mentioned near the beginning of the Bible and than again near the end. The bible warns against taking away from the holy scriptures. What authority gives you the right to speak against these books? Have you no fear of God? He warns all against those who attack his word and take away from or add things to it. How dare you do such a thing. Also was not the Book of Enoch found among the dead sea scrolls?
@dwightklaver64205 жыл бұрын
Congrats, another poorly researched video by 119 ministries:-(
@stevencorrea79825 жыл бұрын
Will the real Jew go lay out in that white hot 🌞 black hold 🌞😁.
@marshapple5 жыл бұрын
poorly researched? if you cannot refute their argument, you have no argument. I myself have the book of Enoch but I dont know enough to make claims like yours.
@marshapple5 жыл бұрын
forget my comment. just finished watching the video.....its ugh
@scottisnotfromhere65535 жыл бұрын
@@marshapple i have to agree this is a poorly researched video
@santiagosalgado24579 күн бұрын
concerning the question, did Enoch die and then go to heaven? the answer is simple and is given by Jesus in john charter 3:13 . it reads moreover , not man has Ascended into heaven, but the one who descended from heaven, the son of Man. so according to jesus Enoch was not taken to heaven. its very clear in the tect of john. and yes Enoc did die, just like moses,what God did was cut their life short and bury their body, so their enemies could not find these god fiering poeple, and use thier bodies in some Form of false worship.
@jamaldixon89002 жыл бұрын
So I’m guessing y’all didn’t watch the whole video. Because it’s very simple. Either you believe the Bible or you don’t. If you don’t , then you will continually be deceived. Everything this man said in the documentary he backed up with scripture
@bigbapbap5 жыл бұрын
Let Yah be true and every man a liar!! HalleluYAH for the Ruach hakodesh and truly a baruch to see the body of who are being led in discernments comments and trusting in our Father alone!! Enoch the prophet as Jude said is just that a prophet! “Since the day that your fathers came forth out of the land of Egypt unto this day I have even sent unto you all my servants the prophets, daily rising up early and sending them: Yet they hearkened not unto me, nor inclined their ear, but hardened their neck: they did worse than their fathers.” Jeremiah 7:25-26 KJV Our understandings only comes from one teacher in truth the Ruach hakodesh for no longer will a man have to teach his neighbor. Regardless if we have not been led to the same understanding at the time we love each other and pray for each other and be thy brothers keepers!! For there are always going to be different parts of one body and milk and meat, and babes and elders yet a house divided cannot stand!! Paul before the road to Damascus was in erred understanding yet one of the elect and we are all in erred understanding each day to not rely on our own wisdom for we learn as a child of Yah daily and only emuwnah “faith” is credited as righteousness!! Shalom and love fam.
@nabakanayah31175 жыл бұрын
I disagree with you.Hebrews 11:13 is not referring to Enoch. Also how could Enoch have knowledge about the future? He walked with The Most High PERIOD. Shaking my head🧐
@user-kb5tt5cy7b4 жыл бұрын
Enoch was and is a great prophet, The Lord showed Enoch everything.
@thepublicimage6604 жыл бұрын
Dude, this book explains Genesis and Revelations. It confirms the bible and the bible has confirmed this book in different parts.
@ayyheloo22924 жыл бұрын
But again couldn't this book just have copied these and tried to explain it with the theory it saw fit ? I mean read chap 70 of the book of enoch, the messiah is revealed to be him!
@stephaniejazzy73594 жыл бұрын
Dude it says enoch is the Messiah. This book is blasphemous. Should be burned. All glory to Y-shua the Messiah and He is the Eternal G-d forever!
@erichoceans4 жыл бұрын
I think that's a bit of a stretch, it is just a historical book influencing culture of the time of Christ, doesn't make it inspired scripture, but a good reference to understand the culture and thinking of the time. Not more not less... it just is.
@tendernessforthemonster45174 жыл бұрын
@@stephaniejazzy7359 not at all sister it doesn’t say that, that’s what Enoch heard it doesn’t mean the Angels were talking about him, is a miss interpretation. Enoch is absolutely messianic glorifies Jesus Christ and it doesn’t contradict any doctrine of the Bible these 119 guys they are just simply very bias, they have a lot to loose if they seem to endorse it, they are not genuinely interested in the book’s possible validity.
@Berean17113 жыл бұрын
@@tendernessforthemonster4517 m
@manuelvaladez-reyes97883 жыл бұрын
After seeing this I'm still unsure. Not leaning towards anyone view [lean more toward scripture.] But what I'm saying is I'm open to the possibility of enoch being reliable right now due to my little understanding of Torah. I'm praying that Yah will make it clear in the days moving forward.
@other63813 жыл бұрын
You are right to be wary. The book of Enoch is promoted and sold on many occult web sites. Ask yourself why. Do your own search.
@angiejefferys57795 жыл бұрын
I disagree, Moses had to have something to follow to become the man he was and before him was the book of Enoch
@mysphthejazzien105 жыл бұрын
Angie Jefferys the book of Enoch was the first book of the Bible , for it to go into such detail about the creation and what went wrong and who brought sin and how it came to be wrongfully intertwine with mankind ! And for so many to quote scriptures from it .
@mysphthejazzien105 жыл бұрын
Besides , why would the CREATOR , take him away if he was a lie or fairytale! I can’t see it with my eyes nor with my heart , the Book is for these times of deception!!!!
@mysphthejazzien105 жыл бұрын
It really should be the first book of the Bible.
@rickdavis22355 жыл бұрын
Angie Jefferys Moses had God to guide him.
@rickdavis22355 жыл бұрын
@@mysphthejazzien10 Enoch wasn't a lie or a fairytale. The Book of Enoch found in the Ethioptic bible is suspect because it differs from the fragments written in Aramaic that were found at Qumran. Also, the Book of Parables (1 Enoch) was not found at Qumran. The Ethioptic version is thought to have come about around the 15th century AD because of errors and writing styles.
@ronniemann90145 жыл бұрын
So, We must have to throw the scroll of Ezekiel and his prophecies out, too, then. Rise up, oh Son of Man and Hear.
@shortfilmproductions56965 жыл бұрын
Rise Up! As the google algorithms will also bow down and confess the name of The Son of Man!
@gravityfallscanada5 жыл бұрын
@Paul kept the Sabbath Acts 18:4 Lol this is the same video that uses Hebrews 11:13 to prove that Enoch died? Try some reasearch dude, it's sad to say but this channel isn't the same anymore...
@brucedressel88735 жыл бұрын
Keep doubting and keep looking ... Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 2 Timothy 3 7 KJV
@gravityfallscanada5 жыл бұрын
@@brucedressel8873 No point he deleted his comment I guess there are some people who will never learn...
@ronniemann90145 жыл бұрын
@@gravityfallscanada, Wow.
@gravityfallscanada5 жыл бұрын
4:14 How does Hebrews 11:13 prove that Enoch died?
@boshmontes30985 жыл бұрын
Gravity Falls Canada I was going to ask same question
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
It doesn’t. Because he was already transformed. Or he could have died. It seems Hebrews is contradictory and maybe it’s not Scripture. Lol. Seriously, I don’t know. Why should we have more trust in a pseudopigraphical letter that is anonymous? That’s what “scholars” say. Yet we cannot supposedly trust Enoch...
@boshmontes30985 жыл бұрын
No one knows the author of Hebrews as well
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
Bosh Montes Yes, but they blindly believe it over Enoch, which was written by Enoch. See the hypocrisy? I trust Enoch and Hebrews. I trust Enoch because of overwhelming evidence.
@archcast55505 жыл бұрын
@@pm5206 i believe in hebrews and enoch . . . .it is a blessing to have enoch side by side with the new testament. . . .and the old testament. we cannot dismiss evidences in qumran cave.
@faithchild19225 жыл бұрын
Well, I didn't realize you all opened the comment sections of your videos up for iron-sharpening-iron discussions B-) I do commend you for this, and I pray Truth Seekers can learn to discuss these things in love (these types of discussions/studies help us to "grow in love") ;-) I need to watch this vid, but I do have thoughts on the luminary chapters of Enoch as it relates to the concept to Time and/or to putting Genesis 1:14 in action. Stay tuned, and I will let you know my thoughts on your thoughts ;-) Shalom Friends B-)
@yahuahyahusha3645 жыл бұрын
Faith Child we’ll see how long the comment section stays on. Lately when too many people disagree with their teachings, they will turn off Likes and Comments.
@joshjohnson9406 Жыл бұрын
51:28 Ezekiel is also called Son of Man in the Septuagint
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
92 times!!
@justinerasmus8725 Жыл бұрын
And that my brothers we call blasphemous. Whenever any1 is equated to Jesus he must be stoned
@Love_one.another3 жыл бұрын
This book attracts to the itching ears
@yahsworld29409 ай бұрын
Not really, that’s why most of the church rejects it; which should tell you something. The majority is often wrong and misguided
@imagewell53195 жыл бұрын
Maybe Enoch didn’t copy the later prophets, but God has continued to have the same revelation throughout history?
@saulcruz875 жыл бұрын
I own the Paul C. Schneiders version and It doesn't say (in Enoch 71:13-14) that Enoch is the Son of Man. I always feel like so many people misquote apocryphal books. I was hoping that this man would put my mind at ease and convince me that there are only 66 valid books and everything else is a fraud (that would make life so much easier) but the more I look into it... the more I see that these books are valid. Maybe not canonical but definitely valid or at the very least credible.
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
@saulcruz87 - Both Enoch and the book of Jubilees tell us that man will make errors regarding the years, months, weeks and days. Keeping an open mind to study these "controversial" books, IMHO is proof of a seeker of truth. In my own experience, it seems we are on a mission to mine out nuggets of truth, or call them pieces of the big picture puzzle. Sometimes, it only takes finding that one piece for the picture to make sense. I firmly believe that many authentic works that contain truth have been kept from us and only the ones that serve an agenda have been allowed to be given to us and not in an incorrupt way, but certain words are changed to change the very meaning and understanding of the verse in question and since it doesn't match the context of surrounding verses, it can cause confusion which then makes the student give up. A very ingenious way for the devil to keep one from knowing the truth. I could share how this began with the Hebrew language, but it's too long to share here. The bottom line is this: NO ONE should let these "inconsistencies" keep them from the basic simple FAITH of Jesus Christ.
@NelsonWalters5 жыл бұрын
Truly excellent research and teaching. I was blessed by your work in this area
@mxkesotmh44875 жыл бұрын
This is neither research or teaching, it's assumption and slander.
@methinks15075 жыл бұрын
What are you smoking
@delorissanchez12425 жыл бұрын
They researched nothing for this. Such a shame.
@mattyice30365 жыл бұрын
research and teaching? They literally gave their bias opinion with ZERO PROOF using scripture, which is required as a witness. They used NO WITNESSES to make their false accusations. since when is an opinion piece considered "research"? The fact is, not one single thing in the book of Enoch goes against the laws and commands of YHWY, or the teachings of Jesus, yet the book of Enoch does "in lock step" support these same things of YHWY and Jesus. hmmmmmm
@mikeeone56494 жыл бұрын
Why is Enoch quoted in the new testament?
@119Ministries4 жыл бұрын
Shalom Mikee One, Did you watch the teaching? It answers your question in the teaching. If you would rather read the transcript, we have it available on our website. You can find it here: www.119ministries.com/teachings/video-teachings/detail/testing-the-book-of-enoch/ We hope this helps Blessings and Shalom
@CrossingTheStreetArt4 жыл бұрын
Saying it makes use of passages from the prophets assumes the 1 Enoch was written after the prophets were written. According to 1 Enoch, the book is about the visions Enoch was shown by God before even the flood. He was shown the things that would happen & so were the prophets, so it would make sense for them to agree on prophecies & overlap, so saying it couldn't really have been Enoch since he couldn't have known what the prophets knew when he was prophesying is not a solid argument. You could say the same thing about the prophets: they were faked and must have been conjured by people after Israel rose and fell into exile and required their land in the modern day since they couldn't have known of these things in the era the prophets lived in. See? You first have to prove the book is fake before proving the prophecies in them weren't real prophecies if those prophecies line up real events. If the prophecies didn't line up, then that would be evidence against it, but since it does, it could just the same be evidence in favour of it being real. Also, no book is written while the events in the book takes place. Books are ALWAYS written after the fact. Sometimes, they're written immediately afterwards, like a dream journal you write in when you awaken. Some are compiled from journals and conversations.
@CrossingTheStreetArt4 жыл бұрын
*Reacquired their land
@ryanehlis4265 жыл бұрын
Enoch was a prophet, he was given supernatural revelation from God, Noah had the Enoch book on the arc. Lies!
@manwhoplayswithe31015 жыл бұрын
Enoch contradicts scriptures it says that Yeshua received his name later in life which is blasphemy
@gravityfallscanada5 жыл бұрын
@@manwhoplayswithe3101 What!? 😂😂😂 That isn't in the book of Enoch dude...
@fra3655 жыл бұрын
You can't prove the book of Enoch was on the Ark. Im not disproving the book..But it was written by another author..Read it carefully, someone Its telling a story..
@gravityfallscanada5 жыл бұрын
@@fra365 Lol same thing for the Gospel of Matthew and the book of Hebrews, you're argument is invalid...
@fra3655 жыл бұрын
@@gravityfallscanada I take everything with a grain of salt...I don't believe everything in the bible is inspired because it was written by different authors and manipulated throughout the ages by jews & Christians to promote their agenda and exert control. I think the bible & the book of Enoch tell a great story about our past, our future and our creator. Should i apply a critical thought process?....My answer is yes..You are entitled to your own opinion, just as i am.
@TheSunshinedreamer15 жыл бұрын
This is a clear teaching of the deception of The Book of Enoch and I thank you for sharing this video here on youtube. It is so important for us as Christians to test everything and I am thankful that I found it:)
@herbis13 жыл бұрын
Karen go read the book like Jesus, Jude and Peter did.... as they all quote directly from it...
@johnbreitmeier3268 Жыл бұрын
@@herbis1 They quote a few verses NOT the message of the Book. They used it as an analogy for readers that were familiar with Enoch, must as current pstors might make a Star Wars or Lord of the Rings reference they know that their listeners will understand. This does NOT make the whole Book true. DUH!
@JeffKaste4 жыл бұрын
Enoch III, 72:37 "37 its appearance, according as the Lord commanded. As he rises, so he sets and decreases not, and rests not, but runs day and night, and his light is sevenfold brighter than that of the moon; but as regards size they are both equal." If the sun and moon are the same size: If the earth is immovable: If the earth has ends, edges, corners: If the earth has a Firmament aka Dome above us: If the earth is the Lord's footstool: If the earth is still while the sun and moon over us: As you stated in your video....Joshua 10:13 "and the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.)" If the sun and moon stood still...that implies they were the ones moving...not the earth. If the Bible speaks nothing of the earth spinning and orbiting.... The Earth is Flat. You just haven't thought about it most likely...
@ikelaart4 жыл бұрын
JEFF amen
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
3 Enoch is adulterated rabbinic COMMENTARY on the book of ENoch and IS NOT A true book of Enoch.....SMH.......
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
It also refers to ALIENS in chapter 33 and 44. Again...SMH.......
@moose99065 жыл бұрын
The justification for saying that Enoch was not written by Enoch is weak. Has it not occurred to you that the prophets referenced are giving a nod to Enoch, the same way both Jude and Jesus himself do? Or that what was was revealed by God to the other prophets would not also be reveled to Enoch? Enoch does say God reveled all to him. Furthermore, why do you suppose that mount Sinai would be unknown to Enoch? There is no record of where he traveled or what he saw in his 365 years in the region. Lastly, the second point has nothing to do with the origin of the original document, it simply dates the copy that was found.
@grifce4 жыл бұрын
So the sons of GOD wrote in Genisis 6 and JOB. 2 are good guys Christians??. I notice you said in Genisis chapter 6 it read sons of men. Not . reads sons of GOD and daughters of men.
@119Ministries4 жыл бұрын
Shalom! Could you give me a time stamp of where we say that Genesis 6 reads sons of men please?
@gravityfallscanada5 жыл бұрын
I wasn't the biggest fan of the 3rd statement made in the conclusion. We should have a definitive answer is the Book of Enoch Canon or not and if it is not can why are you even recommending us a way of studying it? It should be refuted just like you've done with other possibly followed ideologies that you have already refuted on this channel. I'm still not sure of The Book of Enoch but what I do know is that it doesn't contradict the Bible in any way it only adds more detail to the pre-flood events and the return of Yahuwah. With all that said, I think what we need to figure out is what are the qualifications/requirements to be considered part of the so-called "Bible Canon", 66 or 88 books depending on what you read. I am almost 100% certain that the Catholic Church and Constantine at the Council of Nicea tampered with some of the books definitely giving us the 66 book Canon we have now. It is so crucial to know what books are part of scripture and what are not because the Bible alone definitely is missing explanations that are found in other books but were these books man-made or removed from scripture? *Again, what we need to find out what are the requirements to pass the "test"of being part of the Bible Canon?*
@yeshuasfootsoldier94075 жыл бұрын
This may or may not be helpful but I have been studying and researching on this issue and I found out that the book of the watchers (Enoch 1-36) are preserved substantially in the Dead Sea Scrolls and is the only one that is credible. The Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls of Enoch are the oldest and closest to the original, the rest are so fragmented that we can't be too sure it is the same as the other manuscripts in Greek, Ethiopic, Syriac, or Coptic versions. So you can scrap the rest. The book of the Watchers gives us all the details we can't find in the canon of Scripture. This ties with everything from Genesis 6:2-4 with the fallen angels copulating with women and having giant sons(Nephilim), to the reason why God had to press the reset button(the flood), to the return of the giants(Nephilim) after the flood, and all the way to Jude saying quoting Enoch 1:9 which is in the book of the Watchers, and even in 2Peter 2:4 which says, "For if God did not spare the angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell, delivering them in chains to be held in gloomy darkness until their judgment." This is the summary of the book of the Watchers(Enoch 1-36). Peter obviously knew that the book of Enoch(specifically the book of the Watchers), told this story in great detail which Jude echoes. The apostles and the early church fathers knew this book. But then again, I can only say that I am only convinced with the book of the Watchers, the rest you can just set aside. I hope this helps, it finally gave me peace of mind in regards with this matter.
@cohencyrus53375 жыл бұрын
Yes actuslly , why is t that the book was in bible earlier on ..so it was inspired by God 800 yrs ago but presently its not inspired by God.. this confuses me alot. you should be right bro
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
The Ethiopian and Dead Scrolls have Enoch along with other books in Tanakh. There are 6 “canons” or more correctly, versions of Scripture. Dead Sea Scrolls, Ethiopian, Aramaic, Armenian, Roman, protesting Roman. It’s evident that Dead Sea Scrolls and Ethiopian preserves more Scripture (two witnesses). Later on, we see people have messed with Scripture and removed what they did not like (not because the Most High told them) or it went against their religion. This is why religion is a lie. The whole Scripture is true. Scripture does not mean a certain number of writings. I believe there are over 100 books.
@elizabethprov28945 жыл бұрын
Canon means Roman law. Canonized means approved by Roman law. I don’t trust the Roman authority (the Catholic Church) to decide what is inspired and what is not. Instead, test for yourself everything written. If it agrees with scripture, great! If it contradicts (and let’s not forget even some the gospels contradict in small details) in DOCTRINE, then it ought be discarded. But if small details are different, let’s not throw out the baby with the bath water. Much can be learned. I fully disagree with 119’s conclusion about Jasher and Jubilees. I find much edification in those books, and 1Enoch as well. You cannot reach a conclusion about these books if you have not read them.
@pm52065 жыл бұрын
Elizabeth Proverbs 28:9 Yes. But this false teacher is why Steve Moutria left. He quotes people who don’t accept Scripture. That automatically invalidates his claims. Also, if he knew Enoch and studied it, it does not contradict. Without Enoch or Jubilees , Genesis looks like a poorly written book of fairytales and looks like the Most High is bloodthirsty and a maniac. That’s what skeptics say until I tell them Enoch and Jubilees and they cannot say that because we see how the Most High got rid of evil beings that were destroying mankind. Otherwise, we be doomed. Finally, the NT heavily uses Enoch and some Jubilees and other books. To be consistent, people either reject NT or accept all the books. This has been the workings of hasatan for generations to attack the Scriptures. It’s no different than people attacking marriage, promoting abortion, etc.
@awatchman59455 жыл бұрын
119 Ministries....... No thanks. I see you also attempt to discredit the Book of Jasher. Why all the time and energy spent on this? Shouldn't you just be proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ? You call yourself a ministry right? Stop trying to disprove Scripture that was used by the Apostles also, and lines up with Canon Scripture 100% and just do what The Lord commands you to do ! Proclaim the GOOD NEWS !
@chemtrailmary5 жыл бұрын
i thank you, 119 ministries, for your perspective on enoch. the calendar in enoch is interesting. the jews keep the lunar calendar for the moedim which seems illogical and not scriptural. i have heard even the jews know something is off with their calendar. well, we all do the best we can to serve our Creator. may Yahuah bless 119 ministries!
@brenosantana14585 жыл бұрын
Searth the Enoch calendar.
@mattyice30365 жыл бұрын
chemtrailmary said "the jews keep the lunar calendar for the moedim which seems illogical and not scriptural". HAVE YOU EVEN READ THE SCRIPTURES? Psalms 104:19 "He appointed THE MOON for moedim"! It literally says the lunar calendar was for MOEDIM! quit spreading lies
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
@@brenosantana1458 while the Qumran calendar is so very close, they have ERRED in the beginning of how to calculate it. Sad but true. The true calendar is Sabbath FRAMED. Rabbi Jonathan Sacks (may his soul rest in peace) showed me this truth in one of his precious books, but I could tell he had no clue about it at the time of the writing. In fact, he knew things without knowing them, if you can receive that. His books are chocked full of wisdom and nuggets.
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
@@mattyice3036 WRONG. The Judaic lunar calendar system was brught in by posers who fled form Babylon along with Judah to come back to Israel. I'm pretty sure you won't like hearing that but if you do your homework you'd already know this. The bible speaks of this in Esther. SMH......Abba !! Please help your Children to KNOW YOUR TRUTH!!!
@brenosantana1458 Жыл бұрын
@@ateachableheart2649 How so? In your opinion.
@orestislazanakis49602 жыл бұрын
What if unlike the rest, the Book of Watchers is legit from Enoch?
@jbmac48893 жыл бұрын
To deny this book as scripture would be tantamount to calling Jude (among others in the scriptures) a liar. We would in fact be calling God a liar. Jude quotes from this very book. Jude also called Enoch a prophet. He also gives him antiquity (with his lineage). Jude preached from this mans book to his congregation. Jude never would have taken the liberty to say such things if they were not true. God loved this man so much that He took Him to live with Him in heaven. This is a prime example of why John said in 2nd John 20 & 21 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. Like any men or women of today, you have been taught by the same ones that Jesus warned us about. The false teachers. The nephilim's educational system (now called the seminary). I would urge you to consult God on this matter. The holy spirit is the only way to the truth. Not man. May God bless you with His truth that you may see with both eyes, and hear with both ears. Amen.
@consolidate12345 жыл бұрын
I stopped listening at 11 mins plus. My spirit is seriously fighting with these human comments discrediting the book of enoch.This book was directly referred to in the bible. So the bible made a mistake by referring to it. Please be careful.
@truthhunterministries1361 Жыл бұрын
You can not prove THIS is the book referenced in scripture. Be careful what you fall for!
@LawrenceKennard Жыл бұрын
I understand your difficulty but you should have listened on. He directly response to that
@scottmiller77165 жыл бұрын
About 1/3 of the way through the video and it seems to me that he has a conclusion that he already reached and is now making arguments to support that. I personally don’t have an opinion about Enoch yet. But when he talks about “heavenly secrets” didn’t Paul receive heavenly secrets? Didn’t Moses receive secrets that no one else was told when he was given the first five books of the Bible? How about Isaiah and the rest of the Prophets? They were given specific info no one else was given. So that’s a strange argument to keep making as if that makes 1 Enoch unworthy. 👉🏼 Edit: watching the entire video leads me to the conclusion that Enoch is not to be considered inspired on the level of holy scripture.
@Equalshares5 жыл бұрын
Brother it is inspired. Wow. It's Messianic prophecy gives me tears and chills. The messages on righteousness only strengthen. I've been studying and I've read it numerous times in the lastand studied and meditated and prayed and his health to just bring me deeper into more truth and a powerful relationship with Yah
@ahskincare31503 жыл бұрын
The Ethiopian Cannon has Enoch as Cannon and I believe The Cannon is like 800 years older.
@ajaxslamgoody97364 жыл бұрын
Why use BCE and CE unless your being politically correct and bending to academia and a world review that wanted to replace the word Jesus. AND by your argument, We can't prove Moses wrote Genesis. It by your definition, was written later by an author after Moses Death.
@ChristosAnesti334 жыл бұрын
Good God - do I believe this book or NOT?! Why is it so confusing?!
@SouthernGardensHomestead4 жыл бұрын
DO OVER This isn’t the 119 Ministries that I have came to know.
@deelove84135 жыл бұрын
I have a Question? Jesus said it will be just like the days of Noah. Well in those days, the fallen ones walked on Earth. Could it be a tell tell sign? In Daniel, it says there will be a book sealed until the end of times. What's to say the Book of Enoch isn't that book. Sealed until the people who needed to know what's coming. I'm just saying. The bible, in Daniel and in revolution talk about the book that will be sealed until the end times. Genesis 6.4 talks about the sons of God mating with the daughter of man. Their offsprings were Giants. And you learn more from the book of Enoch. And it matches to the bible. I'm sorry I dont agree with your opinion.
@kathrinawebb49273 жыл бұрын
I just want too say that is a intelligent thought and observation !! Another observation is That We DO NOT KNOW THE FULL TRUTH AND ITS MADE VERY CLEAR IN SCRIPTURE THAT WE won't until it is time so The idea that a seemingly intelligent Child if The Lord is so stead fast that These writings are just black and white Right or Wrong like we even know what it really said these are translation And I just don't believe it's that easy or clear
@deelove84133 жыл бұрын
@Kathrina Webb , since I've been researching for the truth for the past 9 years. I've discovered all churches are teaching lies and Deceptions. That many died in the past that would not follow in the teaching of today. And today people follow blindly without researching or reading for themselves. Doesn't the word say many will die because of lack of knowledge. What I have learned are that the 1st 5 books of Moses. The old testament Teaches the root of God religion. And the book of Enoch as it states in the book it was written for the generation that will be living in the END of Time. As e know it.. When God returns. Deuteronomy 13, God teaches his people...it says... if anyone comes teaching anything different than what God has put in place with the 1st 5 books of Moses. Than that person was put to deaths because they would teach against God word. God does not like to be worshipped like the pagans worship their gods. Pagan roots- Sunday worship, Easter 🐣, good Friday, Ash Wednesday and Christmas, it was really the son god ra birthday, an Egyptian god, not Jesus. Jesus was born around September according to the bible. And his real name is, Yoshuah in Hebrew and Joshua in English. And I can keep going on and on about all the things they have changed throughout the centuries. If there was NO GOD. WHY GO TO ALL THIS TROUBLE AND CHANGE EVERYTHING OF GOD. AND CORRUPT IT. IF THERES NO GOD????? I'm just saying . GOD ask us all to seek him and learn the truth. Be thankful to Jesus for allowing all of us to have a chance to have a personal relationship with the creator. We only worship God, and what God likes. Follow 10 commandment, is being a good person and honor the Sabbath, is honoring God, which is the 7 day of the week. Not like Sunday which is the 1st day of the week and it was son god ra day of worship. God stuff has been twisted up into pagan roots. God is trying to reach everyone, seek him and you will find him. Read learn.
@alexfrancis56855 жыл бұрын
Just one addition, the bible didn't say that Enoch did die in Hebrews 11:13,It was referring to all who did die, but it clearly states that "he did not see death," the bible did point out all who died in the rest of Hebrews 11 and they named most of the previous individuals except Sara and Enoch. But we read about Sara's death in Genesis so. Just pointing that out. So I believe it's contrary to say he did not die but died afterwards.
@seekrighteousness2974 жыл бұрын
why are you not using other references other than Nichelsberg where are your 2 or more witnesses
@melinda.g.thompson5 жыл бұрын
You say Enoch couldn't have written the book because he quotes so much of the latter prophets after him , then you do not understand that God says He changes not , He is the same yesterday , today ,and forever ,He declares the End from the Beginning, That he is the first ,and The last , the beginning and the end .. That He ( God) is the Spirit of prophecy and Inspired men of God wrote the books
@benjaminfalzon46225 жыл бұрын
Enoch did not die, nor did Elijah, Enoch and Elijah are the two end-time witnesses described in Rev 11. That was the only reason why God took both of them alive since the two witnesses will finally die and the remain dead for three and a half days. Rev:11:9 God people will only die once since the second death is final. The second death is for the wicked people, Rev 20:14-15, There are no more resurrections for those who suffer the second death.
@benjaminfalzon46224 жыл бұрын
@Scott M Sykes The Witnesses of today are the witnesses of Charles Taze Russel and Joseph Rutherford, not God witnesses, and they are preaching a false gospel about some Jesus who is an archangel.
@benjaminfalzon46224 жыл бұрын
@Scott M Sykes God is not a respecter of persons, Act 10:34 "KJV" So then, why would God allow his son Jesus to suffer death, while on the other hand, neither Enoch and Elijah suffered death? Why were Enoch and Elijah both taken alive by God, if God didn't have a special reason in mind for them,? God does nothing without a reason, that reason is, Enoch and Elijah are to be sent back in the last days, as God two end-time witnesses... where they will finally suffer death.Rev11:8 "KJV"
@benjaminfalzon46224 жыл бұрын
@Scott M Sykes So tell me, what is the true gospel of YAHWEH? You do realize, that YAHWEH was in fact, the same God that told Moses "I am who I am" Ex3:14. Here's the clue. Jesus said... "No one has ever seen God, except the one and only Son who is himself God, and is closest relationship with the father has made him known. John 1:18 "KJV" So why would Jesus make such a statement since Moses and others have seen God in the Old Testament? Was Jesus telling lies?...No, Jesus wasn't lying because, in fact, Jesus was the same God of the Old Testament. The God that Moses saw wasn't God the Father but God the Son whom the JW call Jehovah, and Jesus the archangel...Yahweh is "I am that I am" who later was born as Jesus Christ...Are you preaching that same gospel, bro, or are you preaching a different gospel?
@thegametower3 жыл бұрын
Enoch, Elijah, and the thief on the cross all died in the same place, New Yerushaliym. They were the millenial caretakers of transforming paradise from the garden of eden, into the city of the Elect.
@nickmansfield12 жыл бұрын
@@benjaminfalzon4622 yeah, Yeshua is the angel, Michael, as John and Paul testified, John 1:1, 6:38, 8:56-58, Gal.4:14.
@johncampbell9705 жыл бұрын
SHALOM, I will continue to test this because there are verses in the 66 books that man has added to or subtracted from... We know what the Word says about this... Thus the same can be said of the book of Enoch! Also since ALL scriptures is inspired of Yah... then "ANY" scripture mentioning Any other book thats not in the 66 books also has to be considered inspired(such as the book of Yasher). Why?.. Because the scripture that speaks about that particular book is considered inspired. One FINAL note... I too wait for the day spoken about at Zephanyah 3:9 R U LISTENING??
@Nexus-ub4hs4 жыл бұрын
Book of Enoch (1) is a massive support to the case of Jesus, probably the best when you start to analytically understand the Tanakh and NT, history etc. Yes it was written late and not by The Enoch. Idk, it rings some truth to me at least.
@johnbreitmeier3268 Жыл бұрын
The Book of Enoch is a book of lies made up over 2400 years after the events it pretends to tell about. It reeks of lies. It does NOT lead to Jesus at all. Why do you think it does???
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
incorrect.
@justinerasmus8725 Жыл бұрын
The Quran rings true to me. So by that definition it is true right?
@ateachableheart2649 Жыл бұрын
@@justinerasmus8725 what most people don't understand: God gave the Torah to Israel. Israel and the children of Ishmael are RELATED through Abraham. I'm a very exact person when it comes to using correct terms. For anyone who is descended form Abraham to call another descended, an antisemite, they are also speaking against themselves. God states quite clearly that the nations can worship their other gods, but Israel, ONCE THEY ENTER INTO COVENANT with Him, are not allowed to. So my takaway from this is: If you feel called to practice Islam, then do so, but it serves a person well to explore everything related to God including the Bible that Christians and Jews have.
@JonathanHernandez-qm1bt4 жыл бұрын
So... What was Jude talking about?
@119Ministries4 жыл бұрын
Shalom Jonathan, We answer this question in the teaching! Blessings and Shalom
@ccauguste77464 жыл бұрын
At 4:21 he said enoch died later in hebrews 11:13...smh ...here's what hebrews 11:13 says....These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. Where does this verse say that enoch died? Smh. Lies! Read the bible yourself and connect the dots...pray and Yah will guide you! There is no truth in this world....the book of Enoch is real!
@lawrencethomas76715 жыл бұрын
Keep your false teachings teach the Word of Elohim two or three witnesses u say Enoch is not scripture so how did Moses know of Enoch so if Jude know about Enoch the same way Moses did through the spirit teachings and saying from the heavens so is yeshua must be false to I guess according to u cause he the 2nd witness of Enoch with the rich and Lazarus along with one other book that’s not in the Bible tells where we going when we die so if the oldest manuscript is 200 years before yeshua and Enoch is false why would yeshua verify it see y’all have to be in the spirit to verify and not in flesh and spirit going to tell u two or three witnesses establishes a thing stop going on worldly ways on heavenly matters start listening to the spirit and word of Elohim
@deborahpadilla5525 жыл бұрын
Who are these church fathers to decide for us what is or not the inspired word of God? Only the Ruach Hakodesh (Holy Spirit) can guide us in to all truth Jn 16:13. HE will tell us what is inspired word of Yahuah, not those people who decided for us what we can or cannot read. I follow the Holy Spirit not Jews or scholars, or historians, much less 119 ministries. I will decide what is the word of Yahuah along with His guidance not theirs. Blessings and peace to all.
@robbielee21485 жыл бұрын
I have studied this myself over the years & agree with this presentation. Well done.
@douglashuckelberry65485 жыл бұрын
Son of man in the link after getting through son of manasseh. Many of the prophets used it according to kjv. Were they refering to Yeshua? Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Isaiah.? Son of man , prophecy, was he talkimg aboit Yeshua? You must apply the same test you tested Enoch with.
@stefanbach76525 жыл бұрын
At 27:25 the narrator says that early Christians rejected Enoch as authoritative. Not exactly. Do these people actually read church history. When the council decreed what is scripture, in the case of the OT they followed the Jewish Torah. Books of the Law, Prophets and writings. The original Catholic Bible included the non canonical since they were included in the Septuagint . Enoch would have been included except for one small problem - Arius. Arius and his followers believed that Jesus was born human and did not exist before this time. The Book of Enoch presented a problem with their views and they made a very successful program of destroying every copy of Enoch that they could find. However Enoch was included in the Ethiopic Bible. Of course God already knew this and that is why Enoch states that HIS BOOK would not be available to most Christians but will be available in the end times.