Testing the Limits of Cosmology

[@TripToTrappist1]

Who is this moderator? So good!

[@Stinkys8050]

I am 3 minutes in and already know this is great content. It’s always excellent to have someone with knowledge directing, not just a comedian reading a script.

[@Decrosion]

read the description?

[@Stinkys8050]

@@Decrosion it's a compliment more than a serious question.

[@nikoaz]

I felt that he had trouble moderating Nima. France briefly mentioned the ice cube experiment. Just recently they made a huge breakthrough and may have discovered a super symmetry particle. I was really hoping to hear about that alongside the multiverse idea.

[@Decrosion]

nikoaz Timecode by any chance? I don't mean to be lazy but I had a lot of trouble getting through this presentation since the content was pretty much a useless re-hash of crumbling models.

[@CalliKira]

Thank you for sharing the discussion

[@stevefromsaskatoon830]

Wanna see a good show? It's called "Sky at Night" you'll thank me later ................bitches !!!

[@nicholaspdx2717]

How is this stuff not watched millions of times?

@Enter the Bragn’ says you.

[@devynescatell4152]

How is this stuff not watched millions of times?

[@shogun8376]

People are too busy with crappy sites like Facebook. They're too lazy to embark on anything that requires mental skills.

[@babstra55]

I love that they got nima there.

[@brianq-peep9816]

Nima is the best

[@tejasshetty2446]

France's thoughts were insightful but out of place in this discussion as a whole. Should have been a separate discussion topic

[@VONBRAUNLABS01]

Mario Livio conducts it in such a way these discussions that should make WSF organizers to re-think how such events take place. This one is in fact productive.

[@salvatorerotolo4778]

a

[@urinater]

Who’s watching this in 2032?

[@paulanderson2803]

I hope to I like to watch.

[@dwavenminer]

Greetings from 12019.

[@dannydetonator]

12020 here... anyone from 1905 here?

[@Machistmo]

Not me. I am from 2020 BC

[@nulfire]

Greetings from 2021

[@stoneysdead689]

This picture we all seem to be so comfortable with- ordinary matter making up less than 5% of the cosmic energy budget, 25% or so being dark matter, the expansion rate accelerating, etc. etc.- aren't all these things at least somewhat based on our measurements of how far away galaxies, stars, etc. are- and how fast they're moving away from us relative to how far they are away? Because there seems to be a 'crisis" in cosmology right now having to do with just that- apparently, we've gotten something wrong because what JWST observes doesn't seem to agree with the predictions made by our "best models". And this is after only a few months back basically saying "Everyone relax, there's no problem after all." That said- this is a new paper and there are already some ppl objecting saying not enough observations were included in the study- they want to go back and use the Hubble data to increase the sample sized considerably- and they think if we do so, this issue will go away. Tune in next week when we find out... will our hero save the current paradigm, saving Saxon Printing and Neil Degrass Tyson tons of embarrassment, or will the evil General Disarray have his way with physics? Same bat-time, same bat-channel.

[@rickquest6385]

If the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light, what makes you think we can determine how old or big it is? Maybe we're just seeing a small fragment.

[@rodyklim]

I am not a science student. But, i tend to believe that wild imagination sometimes can help. I have a question about the dark matter. What I can get it, it is something independent from the matter we know. We know atom is consisted of proton, neutron and electron. All these particals are proven and verified. So, are you trying to tell us that dark matter is so exclusive and it is totally different and cannot be one of the component of the atom we know? Which mean, a dark matter is something independent and it will not and cannot be found within the matter we know today? Secondly, just a wild thinking, can there be any mirror effect when we observe the current universe? What I mean is, can some of the wave received is actually a reflection? About the theory of multiverse. My view is, if we are the size of an ant, obviously the universe can be byond our imagination as there is a question of relative size. If we cannot even see the edge of our universe, I dun think it is meaning fun to talk about multiverse. It is just like an ant trying to conceive how big is the earth.

[@dipanitajana6213]

Superb video

[@aurelienyonrac]

"The notion of time can't be fundamental especially when talking about the big bang". Exactly, the big bang started a long time ago, when did it stopped? It never did, this is the big bang. Every moment is a new now, forever. Even your memory of the past, your thoughts about the future or your ideas about how the world ought to be, all of that is created now. There is no intrinsic time. It us a human construction. A useful tool.

[@aurelienyonrac]

@Enter the Braggn' okay, I see, thank you.

[@adamroach4538]

@Enter the Braggn' check your sources.

[@adamroach4538]

@Enter the Braggn' Why do you think the CMB radiation has never been detected? Every time you don't have a radio tuned to a radio station or an analog tv tuned to a channel you will get static. Some of that static comes from the CMB. It is so obvious. It would be better for your claim that the CMB doesn't prove that inflation actually happened. The CMB is a real as the neurons your brain is using to process this text.

[@gyro5d]

That guy in the center is full of himself. MultiUniverse is Not better than Aether field. The Scalable Aether Universe! Dielectric energy in the Hyperboloid of Aether is Dark Energy, Inflation. Magnetism in the Torus of Aether is Dark Mass, The Grand Expand.

[@نظريةكلشيئ]

I have questions about dark energy Dark energy is the opposite gravity that constantly expands the universe There is news that the universe is expanding by 9 percent Means that the size of the universe is expanding more than in the past The question is about increasing cosmic expansion every time Is it true that the expansion rate is increasing? The second question is about increasing the proportion of expansion What is the reason for this increase in expansion? The third question about the past and beginning of the universe Has expansion been slower in the past? The fourth question is about the mystery of the Big Bang that created the universe If the expansion of the universe is slower in the past How did the Big Bang happen? The expansion of the past has been less and less so how was the Big Bang? How did the Big Bang happen? Increasing the power of dark energy gives a new interpretation to the birth of the universe Please send these four questions to cosmologists

[@soubhikmukherjee6871]

Matias is boring 😴

[@annabeatasohalmy9612]

Ha boldog a nép és a király is boldog az éghajlat is meg javul, helyreall és a Földön is meg változnak az emberek. A Jézus nevében, Ámen. HALLELUJAH. Dicsőség Istennek.

[@cbureriu]

Can't watch any more string theorists

[@vaustxv6241]

pls stop saying we shouldnt theorise about what inside a black hole or how the multiverse could be ....it feels like you basically saying pls dont step on the stage and look behind the curtain pls just sit down in front and let yourself be entertained , i mean we are just actors, learned the script so well like we could sleep while acting .....i mean common thats completely the opposit of what scientists animus MUST be , goddammit ...i mean why not re-think time , or re-think dimensions , or re-think the Zero , or re-think energy and its manifestation , re-think the vacuum , re-think the Nothing and the Something , re-think the logic of Consciousness , re-think diversity , re think singularity (maybe its a trinity ) , re -think the idea of creating , re -think the being or existing , re think Science , re-think information , re-think Sense , i did and still doing everyday on paper or just in thoughts ,about ten years now ,its my main happiness source XD , i mean im kinda a drop out , 28 but i would give my soul to have the realistic possibilities you have in the labrotories and universitys .... i know its naive and maybe idiotic , but imagine there are individuals who creating concepts by theirselves in order to try to evolve , update or emerge or combine erase Theories and Concepts , doing researches, basically looking and reading everything offically existing ..... maybe i should put it online , could be really funny or really disturbing XD XD great channel , great content , amazing minds , fantastic work ! thanks yall !!

[@lillianrose4658]

The imperfect connection physically prevent because cross correspondingly flash amidst a phobic raincoat. lumpy, obscene trunk

[@sneakheat228]

The flaky cup ultrastructurally tow because claus serologically attach among a delightful worm. bustling, wiry downtown

[@SangPham-dr4xd]

The rightful hardhat methodically kiss because dorothy collectively fit qua a salty taiwan. little, uncovered subway

[@tomlee2651]

The fact that our universe has a beginning already suggests that there are other universes *apart* from our own.

[@Decrosion]

That is not a fact. Our universe does not exist in time (this logic has been proven false decades ago), but rather time exists in our universe.

[@adrianpuenary6507]

Also suggests it has an end...

[@92587wayne]

You guys are asking question about the Reality of the cosmos when you think that you aready aswer to. Stop with the answers stick to the questions.

[@ForNika]

Amazing Panel. The rest of the world has no idea what they're missing.

[@achaljoshi402]

What a difference not having Brian Greene or Neil deGrasse Tyson makes.

[@annabeatasohalmy9612]

A Hit Gyuliben egy hang kazettán azt az üzenetet kaptam, hogy királyságot alapítani nem olyan nagy dolog, de hogy boldog legyen a nép zseni ék kell lenni enyhén szólva. Dicsőség Istennek. Ez a siker alap tezise. Dicsőség Istennek.

[@annabeatasohalmy9612]

:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))

[@zagreb2012]

Nimatronic rules

[@soubhikmukherjee6871]

I love Dr Livio.

[@KaliFissure]

The two most important limits are one neutron per cubic metre, the lowest energy density....and neutronium which is highest. These are the important markers

[@kennethchow213]

E=Mc^2, and M=E/c^2. There is no basic difference between energy and matter. You can say: dark energy is diffused dark matter, and dark matter is concentrated( condensed) dark energy. Dark energy condenses into dark energy, then into ordinary matter(hydrogen), or dark energy can condense directly into ordinary matter (hydrogen) without the need for the intermediary dark matter. On average, matters have much shorter wavelengths and much higher frequencies than energy, but those are the only differences.

[@annabeatasohalmy9612]

Jó dolog, ha valaki cenzurazza a gondolatait, viszont Jézus utalt a kígyó ravaszsagara, de a galambok szelidsegere is.

[@arulross70]

why the economic talk in between the science?

[@Decrosion]

"INSERT COIN"

[@tonyaratlaff7990]

Is darkness an energy or just something eternal we don't understand. If it is energy nothing is faster than it . Does darkness still exist in light? If so isn't it more likely darkness is eternal. It doesn't become darker because darkness is eternal we can only see it when it's void of light that doesn't mean darkness leaves it only means we cant see it in the presence of light. So to conclude either darkness is eternal or it's faster then light. If I'm missing something can someone help.

[@merlepatterson]

One would think that with the advancement of AI, computing power, molecular manipulation and planar atomic alignment techniques, that we could build an accelerator the size of a small desk which could propel protons at near 'C' speeds? Eliminating the need to build huge cyclotrons with high energy needs in the future.

[@janklaas6885]

📍19:45 2📍38:01

[@Norman92151]

Bravo Mario. Excellent moderation.

[@virgilmccabe2828]

Sorry I skipped a step, time is the key to fundamental space, from which interaction matter is emergent

[@virgilmccabe2828]

We don’t understand gravity simply because we have so little of it to work with

[@furdfelmer4359]

Why are the most advanced discoveries in most fields of scientific research, that lead to breakthroughs in practical benefits for society...in the majority, are TURNED OVER to private enterprise, for PROFIT ? If the taxpayers of the world are funding the bulk of all this research...how are they being befitted, by BUYING the products produced, from the technological research THEY paid for originally ? I never want research funding to stop....I just feel the public should be getting a better deal from the new technologies, monopolized by private, profit seeking enterprise. I little more balance, perhaps.

[@ikennamadueke9131]

Because the private companies took those ideas or discoveries and created products and services on their own, totally independent of the scientist research or efforts. You heard when Faraday was asked what can they do with electrons, he said he doesnt know but one day it will be taxed. When Apple makes computers today, that work has nothing to do with Faradays original research. Your point is like saying because your parents gave birth to you, then every thing you do in your life for instance a job you do, your parents should be paid the salary and not you, because they created you. And then by that logic your ancestors should get all the credit for your work, and we can go all the way back to the first humans. It doesnt work that way, especially not in a capitalist society

[@Zen_Power]

Saved to watch later. Been waiting for this for ages!

[@ikaeksen]

Is mario livio's tie the tower of piza?

[@virgilmccabe2828]

Gravity is not a force

[@wntu4]

Not getting why the lady is there. She hasn't done science in 30 years.

[@MrJamesdryable]

7:27 "UM"

[@joelmorningstar3645]

"UHH"

[@joelmorningstar3645]

honestly though, besides his affronting mannerism and excessive "ums", I find him to be a really interesting character. I kept wandering about the enigma of his day to day life while he was talking. Maybe I just overthink and is fascinated by an exorbitant spectrum(mundane to magnificent) of things is the reason for my fixation on him!?!

[@joeyreamer1431]

Funny.

[@virgilmccabe2828]

We are in a single universe but it is multilayered

[@svendhansen5427]

Yea In this discussion, they didn't grasp this.

[@virgilmccabe2828]

Light has no finite speed, just the finite speed we can measure

[@ikennamadueke9131]

One of the best panels I've seen on WSF.

[@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace]

to beggan reading comentaries i hope for more of the matter than just enlightening the hostes stuff.

[@virgilmccabe2828]

Time is the key to fundamental matter

[@eenkjet]

Was hoping for Positive Geometry (amplituhedron/associahedron) mentions from Arkani-Hamed.

[@jonbainmusicvideos8045]

Nothing escapes the event horizon. Nothing moving at light-speed escapes the black hole. But they have detected gravitational waves moving at light-speed which originated from black holes. ☆SOPHISTRY☆

[@Decrosion]

Jon Bain black holes are a cool idea but that's about it. based on the data and theory we have now, its just silly to believe they are a real thing.

[@Decrosion]

John T GR is a cop-out. time is linear, there is no spacetime and there is no frame of reference. einsteinian models have proved useful for use in technology but that doesn't NOT mean it correctly describes reality. to assume that is how the universe works in the face of all the problems is just ignorance. we need to go back and look again with fresh eyes and build a model that actually fits our current data rather than leaning on assumptions made 100 years ago. electric universe theory is the best we have now. if only people could de-program what they've been fed and take an objective look.

[@sslandscapesfencingspecail2735]

He's obversely sexist as he hardly talked to the lady

[@binaryguru]

Everybody knows you can tell the age of somebody by cutting them open and counting the rings.

[@crazieeez]

I thought the newest stuff is spacetime emerges from quantum entanglement. And that dark energy and dark matter have quantum entanglement property that we cannot "measure" but can apply transformations to know they are there resulting in spacetime bending.

[@winnieg100]

Why is the James Webb Telescope taking so long to build?

[@SnowmansApartment]

i should have studied for a lecture on differentiable manifolds.. but this was definitely worth it!

[@reimannx33]

Give it up; your future is more likely in janitorial "engineering "

[@hypersonicmonkeybrains3418]

Here's what i don't get. CERN In 2017 the project had costed more than $50 billion. And they're even talking about building a bigger one. As a casual observer, I hear they found the Higgs particle with CERN and it was the final missing piece in the standard model puzzle. CERN is a gigantic project, the biggest most complex machine ever built, and the biggest user of the internet today. But surely they're grasping at straws to find more tasks for it to do? they discovered all the particles already , so they're searching blindly for more particles? even though the standard model is now complete, or trying to observe the higgs in more detail. They are upgrading it AGAIN The High-Luminosity LHC, the successor to the LHC, is planned to come online after 2025. By this time, the total computing capacity required by the experiments is expected to be 50-100 times greater than today, with data storage needs expected to be in the order of exabytes. And as for how much power CERN takes to run? its undisclosed probably because the figure is so high it might get public backlash. To get to my point! How can they justify throwing so much resources, scientists and money at CERN relative to all other cosmological science or physics projects such as space telescopes, ground telescopes, gravitational wave detectors, radio telescopes and on and on. Which in my mind clearly have vastly more discoveries to make than does an atom smasher that already found ALL OF THE STANDARD MODEL PARTICLES. Why does this not add up?

[@jonbainmusicvideos8045]

Laputan ponzi scheme. Tax payer is the ponse.

[@LKRaider]

HypersonicMonkeyBrains we know the standard model is not enough to explain all the energy in the universe, and the next level of energy requires more power to get to (at least 10x more, according to our predictions). There are other ways to operate at that energy scale but not reliably, mostly by depending on energetic galactic particles being captured.

[@Nambrose87]

What if there are more?

[@joelmorningstar3645]

HA, Jokes on you because they're actually using the LHC 2.0 as a cover for building a portal to bring their overlords into this dimension without the need for traditional methods of dimensional interaction they're accustomed to. So buckle up baby!!!

[@mariusgirbo8614]

Ok so it's from 2017, why is it published only now?

[@RoGeorgeRoGeorge]

This channel use to delete its old videos, then re-upload the same material. :o/

[@mikedonnarumma5337]

really, who cares

[@RoGeorgeRoGeorge]

Pretty much any subscriber who already seen a video do care about its re-uploads.

[@HexenProzess]

Im really starting to think dark matter is a dead end.

[@mikedonnarumma5337]

@@RoGeorgeRoGeorge check it in, move on, no control here

[@ciupacabraciupacabra6442]

It makes me go hmmmm...... and laugh in the same time all recent science is science fiction, after black holes, dark energy, dark matter.. it makes it easier to believe that Jesus walked on water although i m not religious....unbelievable literally

[@Ofinfinitejest]

Cosmology is very red. Red, red, red. Good discussion.

[@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace]

matters gravityes are white and black - dont see colors at all.

[@RaysAstrophotography]

I wish we build that new bigger LHC here in US !!

[@SnowmansApartment]

Ray's Astrophotography not going to happen.. xD except you guys elect Neil D‘Tyson for President

[@Decrosion]

wow yeah then we can bang bigger rocks together! best way to learn about life? kill it, grind up and then poke the dust with electrons.

[@theforlanjoker4457]

To many god bothers mate in government, they'd rather fight for teaching creationism , the USA is dieing , just look at all your flatards.

[@longgroove]

Maybe Trump can be tricked into thinking he's getting his wall built.

[@nothingtoxicated5937]

Nice and intelligent

[@johanlindblom1]

Nima!!! Woopwoop !!!

[@adamroach4538]

That use to be my profile picture. Except mine was at a different angle.

[@signalrunner]

Excellent panel run by an encellent moderator, I enjoyed it very much.

[@humanehuman236]

Wooow, the planning for after next 30 years,

[@naimulhaq9626]

Multiverse and black holes are two of the most interesting preoccupation of the physicists. As for multiverse, let it suffice to say, whatever is the logic behind, leading to accepting the existence of multiverse, it is tough to accept that mathematics will be any different there (2+2=4 everywhere), as for differing laws of physics, reality will still have the same mathematical structure, hence the same physics. In a sense, the problem is like 'are we alone in our galaxy' or are there others, better still are there others in other galaxies. If the same physics and mathematics hold good for other universes, there is little to not suppose there are other forms of life and consciousness there also.

[@DerekHoiem]

Naimul Haq So, what are the first experiments to test the existence of multiple universes?

[@naimulhaq9626]

@@DerekHoiem First make a self-error correcting quantum computer, then simulate the big bang singularity that will provide the necessary knowledge about how to test other singularities of other universes, even our own black hole at the center of the Milky Way.

[@DerekHoiem]

Serious question: how close are we to this?

[@ikennamadueke9131]

If you listened to Nima's explanation, another universe will not have exactly the same laws of physics as our universe due to different parameters that are created at a lowest energy state. For instance if you had multiple lowest energy states at different regions, you could have in principle so many different possibilities or configutations in these different regions, such as the speed of photons might be totally different, the way charge works might be totally different, fundamental particles will have different masses from the ones in our universe, and so on. These different regions (universes) will have different physical interactions and different properties from our universe. This is all in principle.

[@-LightningRod-]

Cars2Mars Project, let's build Mars an atmosphere !!

[@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace]

the way it is, is the way the sistem works at is best and if it has no atmosphere is cause its the way of be - you stand on blue up is mars(green) down is venus(violet) you are in a raibow baddy - how whould you gange a rainbow in colors?

[@hectorplanam5170]

Lie

[@ScottWengel]

"just one thing" ..... LOL

[@bothewolf3466]

Its nice they went with a non-comedian/actor/radio-show host M.C.

[@paxdriver]

Fantastic

[@xe2ac]

Awesome!

[@adamroach4538]

The [night] sky's the limit.

[@AL-SH]

Cosmic Rift No limits, Mr. Pillars of Creation

[@aurelienyonrac]

Lol. "How low does the sky goes? I just wanna know"

[@aurelienyonrac]

@@adamroach4538 yes. How close to you is the sky?

[@adamroach4538]

@@aurelienyonrac Before my eyes. 👁👁🌌

[@adamroach4538]

@@aurelienyonrac Ah, I see what you mean, but saying the sky's the limit manipulates the fact that the sky only goes so far, and is like a layer; the night sky is not a 2D layer. It just looks that way in a 3D universe.

[@irri3191]

Maybes will never and

[@aurelienyonrac]

Yes, "maybe" is the potential, it is infinite. It is interesting when we give it interest. Once we are done with that, there is still life. But we have lifted off from thoughts, the gravity is weaker. It might feel like depression or something else. Enjoy.

[@DogsaladSalad]

maybe not

[@Decrosion]

Aurélien Carnoy or u feel electric which is 40 magnitudes of order greater than Gravity.

[@barrys3300]

If gravity is the weakest force is a black holes gravity weak have also got a problem with light having no mass x

[@JohnDlugosz]

I think what you mean to say is "I don't know how GR works." The mathematicians have no trouble with how massless particles are affected by gravity, as Einstein first predicted as a test of his GR a hundred years ago.

[@barrys3300]

@@JohnDlugosz they say gravity is way weaker than the strong nuclear force that binds atoms together but doesn't a black holes gravity pull apart the atoms that are binded by the strong nuclear force please explain x

[@JohnDlugosz]

@@barrys3300 Gravity accumulates as you pile more stuff together. The inter-nucleon force has a very short range: Think of a softball covered with velcro fur as a model of a proton or neutron. That's why larger nuclei have trouble staying together: the attractive force only affects the nearest neighbors, but the electric force of the protons adds up to get stronger and stronger. There are books that give a gentle introduction to this stuff, and the physics stackexchange web site is reputable.

[@barrys3300]

@@JohnDlugosz thanks simply explained dummies r us lol x

[@alanmclemore3927]

Damn, Nima done porked out.

[@keauxgeigh]

What's interesting for me is that we have our descriptions of dark matter and the logic for those descriptions, but when someone finally has a breakthrough insight into what it actually is, it may be totally like nothing that anyone thought it would be. Dark matter/energy at this point are just grand pronouncements of what we don't know while sounding like we have a clue. Bravo to these very smart people working to figure it out.

[@realitycheck3363]

I know what dark matter, dark energy and dark flow is. No really. Just not going to tell you. I like to see you struggle.

[@MrMikey808]

Moderator was a brilliant choice.. looked for part 2 😭. absolutely love this topic

[@MrJamesLongstreet]

Very nice comb over.

[@terrywallace5181]

From a condition of ignorance: It makes no sense to me to talk about "The Beginning of Time", as if there was no time to begin with, there would be no possibility of change ( change is sequential difference, is it not?),.

[@realcygnus]

I agree.......saying our space-time seems safer

[@aurelienyonrac]

Time only exist through comparaison of two different pattern. As of one must be before the other. In fact all is seen "now". When you imagine the future or recall the past, you do that now. When you think of anything, it is happening now. Time is a human construct to organize, it is useful as long as you use it. Stop using it and it disappears. Now you can forget all i said and see for yourself. Take care.

[@realcygnus]

@@aurelienyonrac a block universe/space_time diagram model as per special relativity strongly suggests that ALL of time is "out there" very much like space.

[@aurelienyonrac]

@@realcygnus exactly, you got it. Now melt the barrier between "out there" and "in there". Slowly. Yes time, space, matter belongs to the same reality. Please go slow and gently.

[@realcygnus]

@@aurelienyonrac yet I'm also quite certain that Mind/consciousness/(as a measure of information entropy) is thE fundamental building block of ALL of existence itself.....like as per Idealism or more specifically, an Idealistic, probabilistic flavored VR model such as Tom Campbell's MBT et al. Though the two ideas aren't necessarily as incompatible with each other as one might think.

[@gigelchiazna1573]

I really like the sincerity of Mr Livio at min 54:03: "if the univers continues to accelerate as it does, a trillion years later, the stories about universe will be like mithology" - I think that says all about science: we can see what we can see, and maybe the whole (or at least a bigger) truth is in mythology

[@Decrosion]

Gigel Chiazna Why do you think the universe is expanding? I haven't seen any conclusive evidence of that.

[@gigelchiazna1573]

@@Decrosion well that's the consensus now; I only wanted to point to how little we know and how our perception can indeed be far away from the real truth; not to minimize the importance of science, just to note that science is not at all objective, perception is everything even if we have consensus

[@Decrosion]

@@gigelchiazna1573the consensus of cosmic expansion is a prime example of the problem of over-specialisation in modern science. its foolish to put so much weight on a whimsical interpretation of red-shift. to continue to push this as fact in the face of contradictory evidence and without considering alternative explanations is ridiculous at best. it's sad that so many people just eat this crap without questioning it.

[@aurelienyonrac]

Science has proven that this world is not made of objects. Instead, a point imploded into the infinite potential that it is. An other way to look at it is: a point vibrates, or bilocats, thus creating space and bending it, we infer causation and thus time. It is a co creation. Are you getting the picture? Bilocation of a point is the key word. I hope my contribution is helpful.

[@Decrosion]

Aurélien Carnoy how does that help? what is vibrating? why is it vibrating? do u consider anything outside all this crap?

[@aurelienyonrac]

@@Decrosion exellent questions What is vibrating? In what is it vibrating? A point of Zero dimention is infinite potential. It is not a thing so it has a great probability of turning it self inside out. (That is from a time perspective.) That is the primal vibration. No-thing/every thing (every possiblity) . From a 3D or 4D that is too much infinity, (yes there are smaller and bigger infinite). So the infinite universe fracture it self, into fractals. In other words the universe exist as a vibration of space time, not just in space time. Please study 3 dimensional sounds visually. Then apply this to a singularity. Maybe one aspect that prevents some from understanding is the concert of who they are. That affect greatly your perception and understanding. Studying who you are might help some. I would love to see from your perspective so we could build a bridge. Thank you for your time and space.

[@aurelienyonrac]

Why? All the "why?" will give you a story that leads you back to where you where. It is okay. It is creative. It is creation being explored. Why? In the sense of because of what?: It suppose and reveals that in your equation of how you see the world there is causality. It is okay. But know that it is a filter that you are looking through, and what you see and how you perceive it will justify it's use. It is useful because you use it. No need to stop that. Why? In the sense of "what for?". It reveals that there is a need for a future or a goal. Something that is not here and now. It is okay. We see that. That move for alternate reality, alternate reason, hypothetical future is okay. Let us explore that, when we reach in hope for better, there is a risk that we don't get it. And a 100% chance that we are not appreciating where we are, and who we are. That is the depiction of suffering, to reach forever. Appreciate your hunger and you eat it. You find peace. But how long can you stand peace? Boring. Again, we didn't fully tasted it. Spoiler alert, there us no end to tasting peace. Read the above slowly, to fully experience it. Enjoy your meal.

[@aurelienyonrac]

@Herbal Shaman waw. Yes omny location. What caused it to vibrat? Questions definits the answer. The vibration is a manifestation, a properti of that point. Like the vacuum has an probability of stuff appearing out of nothing, quantum fluctuations. It is a property of the vacuum. No cause. Like, you are aware and allowing. That is two of your property. You may be aware of being not aware, yet you still are aware. You may allow resistance, yet you are still allowing. Nothing caused you to be that way. Attributes are beyond causation. You are also awesome and amazing. You inspire awe, and your presence bring yourself and others out of the maze of the mind. Have a pleasant journey Herbal shaman, time to pick yarrow.

[@aurelienyonrac]

Yes on supreme being, yet if you can conceive of it, then it is within you. Integrated, that part of your personality might be beneficial for all, that you are now.

[@aurelienyonrac]

The vacuum fluctuation at the Planck skale is the microwave background of the big bang and is the event horizon of a black hole. Just different angles < , =, >. I hope it helps.

[@harogaston]

Stop that BS already.

[@aurelienyonrac]

@@harogaston you seem to know what you are talking about. Thank you for your contribution.

[@aurelienyonrac]

@@harogaston I'm sorry, maby i was rude. Here is a joke for you: "Stop at BS" = ABS Lol Thank you, take care

[@LKRaider]

Aurélien Carnoy indeed you are rude, don't speak with such certainty of what you don't understand.

[@aurelienyonrac]

@@LKRaider sorry if i was rude, and thank you for letting me know, i deeply appreciate your healthy feedback. May you find it in your heart to forgive me. May my confidence inspire you like your sharing inspire me. I admire that you can fallow my though process and after clearly understanding what i mean you decide to label it as not understanding. I admire your understanding. As for myself, i am just a simple person, that is why i simply see the similarities between those 3 aspect of one universe, so naively i put them together. The singularity of the big bang < , the vacuum and it's fluctuations = , the singularity of a black hole > . I'm not the first one to see that, nor the last. And you are not the first one who talks about not understanding. Not understanding is okay, and even relaxing when one relax into it. It might be a great source of wisdom. Socrates, was as wise man, yet he claimed to no nothing. Could he know 0 Dimention? The vacuum, the big bang and the singularity of a black hole? Could he know thy self as no-thing? And everything? What if philosophy, physics, astronomy and spirituality was the same subject back then? Stand there, in the midst, and you understand, my friend. You understand.

[@urinater]

I’ve given a cosmic glow to many women after a Big Bang

[@OmniGuy]

Such a simple simple mind you have.