The a318 and the a319 will disappear from the airfields. The a220 and the eventual enlarged variant will make them better for most airlines. Only "smaller" airlines with an a320 fleet, which still need small aircraft, will acquire a few a319s. Anyone with larger capacities will switch to the a220 family.
@deanwood13382 жыл бұрын
The only thing is that the 220 doesn’t have the compatibility as the 320 family does. They will be two separate families when it comes to airline…. For example if you have 319 ceo in your fleet now and also have 320 and 321s then he 319neo will be a better option rather than the 220-300 or 500 if they build it.
@XiamiHuАй бұрын
Well, I used to live in China, there are some places that have a requirement of 319 till now and further future. Such as tibet, you can see many 319s but very less 320 or738. But 318 will totally disappear cause replacement of 220.😀
@XiamiHuАй бұрын
In China, airlines that flys tibet still choose to take 319neo instead of 220
@magnustan8412 жыл бұрын
The A321neo is almost the perfect plane, the platform is so flexible, it can accommodate almost many people in a comfortable configuration as a small widebody and can fly so far. From an avgeeks perspective, i prefer photographing the stretched airplane, she looks better in my photos, especially with the sharklets fitted. The black visor of the neo takes things up a notch. The 737 MAX still offers my favourite narrowbody experience, but for airlines, not much can beat the A321neo.
@devanshrdhoot60282 жыл бұрын
wait till 737max 10 comes, it can give a good competition to a321neo because one Auxillary tank can fly upto 6,110km and airlines are going for 2 auxillary tanks so that means 737max 10 can give 12,400Km range
@magnustan8412 жыл бұрын
@@devanshrdhoot6028 Im sorry, what? 😂😂 You mean adding an auxiliary fuel tank will give the MAX 6000km of range. Adding another one will probably add another 500km of range maybe….
@devanshrdhoot60282 жыл бұрын
@@magnustan841 bruh no, this means that it can give almost the same range as a321xlr, if not then why are airlines going for a stretched aircraft that has even less range than its predesscor?
@chrisk_nfl41202 жыл бұрын
@@devanshrdhoot6028 The 737Max 10 is already around, and it has a shorter range but more important worse field performance on take off and landing. Also the issue with it being a 737Max frame means that airlines will probably stay away, especially if the A321XLR is there with better range. According to Boeing, the 737Max-10 has a 3,300nm range compared to the A321XLR's 4,700nm. So yeah, idk about that
@devanshrdhoot60282 жыл бұрын
@@chrisk_nfl4120 airlines are staying away from tjhe 737 max 10?? in which world are you living bro? And 737max doesnt have worst field performance on take off and landing!
@user-xz1wq2de4q4 ай бұрын
flying vietnam airlines a321 ceo is a fantastic experience for me. The platform is so flexible, it can accommodate almost many people in a comfortable configuration as a small widebody and can fly so far. I love it
@aidanzacharyguzman16762 жыл бұрын
For me, it is very hard to choose between the former and the latter, because they are both here in the Philippines. But the A321 is on my bucket list of aircraft to take, as so far I only fly on A320s.
@heidirabenau5112 жыл бұрын
I have flown on the a320ceo and a321ceo as well as the a321neo and a320neo personally I prefer the Neo because they are quieter
@aidanzacharyguzman16762 жыл бұрын
@@heidirabenau511 Lucky... I only flew on ceos so far.
@thegaminghydra592 Жыл бұрын
As a passenger there is little to no difference flying on the 320ceo vs 321ceo so you're not missing out on anything. The neo variants however are much quieter so there's that
@airplanes_anime_kpop_fan2 ай бұрын
First of all, this was a great video. Second of all my more preferable aircraft between the A320, A321, A320ceo, A321ceo, A320neo, A321neo and A321XLR are the A321neo and A321XLR
@chrismckellar93502 жыл бұрын
My preference is the A321neo. I see the A321neo and lessor extent the A321xlr being the main stay of the A320/A321 fleets due to its flexibility. The beauty of the A321, airlines can add the A220 variants or the A320neo and A321 can lead into either the A330neo variants or the A350 variants. Boeing doesn't have this 'mix & match' product range capability like Airbus has.
@fatmaninthesun12 жыл бұрын
I recently flew BA A320 in business class. Exactly the same seats as tourist class, 3 x 3. Only worth the extra because of avoiding long ‘Disney’ lines at check in and the use of their lounges.
@heidirabenau5112 жыл бұрын
Business class in Europe is basically the same as economy apart from priority boarding and security and free meals as well as empty seats next to you so if travelling within Europe and are not having the flight paid for Economy class is much better.
@neilpickup2372 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, the A318 was a bit of a disappointment, but not for the reasons usually given. It was intended to be classified as a 'Regional Jet' with all the financial advantages of that classification to offset against the inefficiencies of a shrink. It would have offered 'full size' comforts to the regional market, and allowed airlines to have commonality between their regional and main A320 series fleets, along with the significant savings from that. Unfortunately for Airbus, the A318 failed to get that classification, so a significant part of its raison d'être evaporated, consequently, there it little reason for a neo version. As for the remaining 319/320/321, I think it is more to do with horses for courses. If you are a 320 series operator (ie easyJet) fleet commonality may well work better for you than for example including A220s or even aircraft from other manufacturers in your fleet. Size matters, and if you run routes where you rarely fill an aircraft, having a longer variant, regardless of its per seat cost, will hurt your bottom line, unless of course you require the additional range of a long range version when different considerations apply. As for writing off the A319neo, while I would not expect it to sell as well as it's larger brothers, until the younger A319ceos, come up for renewal, we cannot be sure. As for being a failure, it only has to sell enough to cover its development costs to be justified, and could be considered a success even if it only sells as many in hundreds as it's bigger brothers do in thousands. Having flown in A319/A320/A321s within the same group, I didn't notice any significant differences with the 'at seat experience', however, I have a strong preference for the A319 with its quicker passenger loading, and fewer suitcases (and their owners!) at the carrousel.
@deanwood13382 жыл бұрын
Yeah I agree I think the 319 has its place in the market. Think people forget aswel that there are many 319 CEO’s out there that are not that old yet so airlines don’t have the need to replace them currently.
@carsten22932 жыл бұрын
I already flew the A319-100, A320-200, A321-100, A321-200, A320neo and A321neo with Cabin Flex Option. And I must say. The best one ist the A319-100 with just one overwings exit 🔥
@Avgeek1564 Жыл бұрын
I'm flying LGW to JFK with jetBlue on the A321, first time flying a narrow body across the pond. Hopefully it'll be okay.
@finncunningham10452 жыл бұрын
You should do a Embraer E2 vs Airbus A220 comparison video!
@gteixeira2 жыл бұрын
It is hard to call either better, given that both are selling. Each one has its own niche where they are the best.
@anasmaaz57312 жыл бұрын
The A321 is advantageous if you want to carry more cargo as it can fit in 3 extra ULDs in its cargo holds when compared to the A320. So, for instance, if an airline has a route with a typical A320 passenger load but a lot of cargo, then the A321 becomes a great investment.
@greensoba2 жыл бұрын
Comparisons have to also be done in the context of competition, and from the perspective the A321neo stands on top as the 737 MAX 9 and MAX 10 could never put up serious competition due to airframe limitations at that segment of the market. The 737 MAX 8, however, competes strongly with the A321neo because Boeing sized it precisely at the point where it carried slightly more passengers while having similar fuel burn as it is a fundamentally smaller airframe.
@ericjones77698 ай бұрын
The A321s are definitely my favorites 💙💙💙
@rayanaltowayan95582 жыл бұрын
I think the A321XLR will be the future 🤙🏼
@tickedoffsheikh8587 Жыл бұрын
Excellent content...my first time viewing this channel. Anyways, I would like for you to do a cockpit and cabin comparison of A320 and A321- neo Vs A320 and A321- ceo. Thanks
@mariachrzski183 ай бұрын
I have only flown on the A319, 320 and 321 ceos. I absolutely adore the A321!
@irenastevancevic43622 жыл бұрын
I prefer A320neo.Bautiful aircraft and very,very quiet.
@gabrieltapiazamora26062 жыл бұрын
Chile becoming famous on a Simple Flying video... Again Jetsmart let's goo
@justinleftwich766610 ай бұрын
I prefer the a321 Neo over the a320. However, I have flown on the a320 more often.
@goutamraoshab37772 жыл бұрын
In India Airbus A320 family aircraft are dominated Avery where a320 aircraft
@karlossargeant3872 Жыл бұрын
I Love watching this Video Topic on Airbus and there A320's & A321's Family Jets including there Newer Version The A320 & A321Neos Jets too I hope to fly on both of The Newer Version of them soon Plus I fly on both A320's and A321's with JetBlue Airways on both New York City Routes During the Summer of July or August Awesome Video!!!!
@junxianglan29072 жыл бұрын
I have only flown on a320ceos(Both IAE and CFM powered). Never the neo versions, never the 321. I would like to fly on the neo one day and also the 321neo.
@Capt.OggyPeabodyOfficial4 ай бұрын
Full service carriers use A321s while low cost carriers use A320s but they can be operated vice versa for some full service and low cost carrier
@rohitnandu2 жыл бұрын
I have traveled on A320neo aircraft of Indigo for the first time.
@christoohunders53166 ай бұрын
Boarding and disembarking times for both high cap neos ?? a nightmare
@donnerhase10 ай бұрын
My favourite airplanes are Airbus A321 and A220
@thenibblershow53056 ай бұрын
Same here🎉
@Faizachandio3 ай бұрын
My favorite is a320 in Airbus family ❤️✈️
@MrHav1k2 жыл бұрын
I flew on an A319 recently and quite enjoyed it. Very comfortable. I've always had good experiences on the A320 family. I think the A321XLR is going to be a smashing success though, especially since Boeing can't make a 757 successor anytime soon.
@heidirabenau5112 жыл бұрын
Boeing hasn't made a true successor to the 767 yes people say the 787-8 is the successor but for airlines looking for fleet type commonality there is no true replacement
@Pro_Existance2 жыл бұрын
I agree I think the A321XLR will sell enormously im worried about all the backlog, a bit like the A320.
@Pro_Existance2 жыл бұрын
I wonder why Airbus made the A318?
@melonyfbb2 жыл бұрын
pls do a vid on ethiopian airlines
@ncaviationfilms Жыл бұрын
Definitely the A321. I love the A320 but boy is it getting old.
@t1039111 ай бұрын
Flown on a bunch of A319/A320 and 1 A321
@miran772 жыл бұрын
I loved neo a321 I flew with indigo
@The_Red_Squirrel2 жыл бұрын
Is the A321 not just a stretch version of the A320? If so, are they not similar, with one not being better than the other, but simply different in order to meet different specification requirements of airline customers.
@heidirabenau5112 жыл бұрын
The a321 is the stretched version of the a320 but the a321 is used for transatlantic flights and high capacity routes like LHR-FRA while the a320 is used for routes like MAN-VIE with less demand
@heidirabenau5112 жыл бұрын
The a320 is the competitor to the 737 compared with the a321 is a closer competitor to the 757
@chandrachurniyogi8394 Жыл бұрын
the A321-200 Neo LR in ACJ specification, is the most suited large cabin business jet by far . . . even bettering the B737-800 BBJ2 & B737-900 ER BBJ3 . . . it is said that the XLR variant of the A321-200 Neo ACJ can fly Singapore (SING) - Frankfurt (FRA) non-stop or Mumbai (BOM) - Dublin (DUB) non-stop . . . seating configuration of A321-200 Neo operated by low cost budget airline shouldn't exceed any more than 213 - 218 paxs . . . plus 5 crew . . . infact the maximum number of seats in a A321-200 Neo should be internationally regulated by IATA & aviation regulators (for e.g. FAA DGCA AAIB EASA etc) in different countries across the world . . .
@subtodicerat8305 Жыл бұрын
Everybody gangsta untill Airbus makes a317 and a322
@TrungNguyen-ho9of2 жыл бұрын
Neo plane can fit more passenger a little bit
@happysmileyface2 жыл бұрын
hi
@grriceman7822 жыл бұрын
Way to go Airbus!! Boeing needed some competition and now you’ve surpassed them in almost every segment.
@evergrandebestrealestate48542 жыл бұрын
What a joke! 777 is still the king and the Boeing 737 , 787 are still selling like hot cakes
@grriceman7822 жыл бұрын
@@evergrandebestrealestate4854 Agreed…the 777 is a beast but selling a product and delivering it are two different things.
@heidirabenau5112 жыл бұрын
@@evergrandebestrealestate4854 Boeing has no competitor to the a321xlr, a220 or a319neo yes the a319neo is not a success but in 10 years or so Easyjet may place a huge order to replace their a319ceos
@evergrandebestrealestate48542 жыл бұрын
@@heidirabenau511 Boeing doesn't have competitors in the small segment but when it comes to the Twin Jet Wide body class there is only one king - That is the 777
@patrickbateman5292 жыл бұрын
@@evergrandebestrealestate4854 The A350 has sold more on a per capita/year basis than the 777. Boeing has the 777, but Airbus has the A350, the A321, A320 and A220. Plus, they won't be delivering any new 777Xs before 2027, shame.
@ronaldregan1 Жыл бұрын
Nice graphics 4:56
@mrrobertwolfiii1079 Жыл бұрын
Appreciate your Airbus love the Airbus A320 And Airbus A320-VIP CRJ-200 and
@averagejoe92492 жыл бұрын
I would definitely not fly the 320 but would certainly fly the 321
@nurrizadjatmiko212 жыл бұрын
I only flown on the Airbus A320ceo at least 10 times and i would say it's an excellent aircraft Interesting fact : at least 33 Airbus A318s are still in service until now including Air France, Tarom, and some Private or VIP operators.
@Pro_Existance2 жыл бұрын
Air France is the one with the most, but I agree
@safiqfirdaus8160 Жыл бұрын
I love a321
@tonyruno37862 ай бұрын
One day I want fly an airbus a321
@SmokeScreen_YT8319 күн бұрын
Bruh I fly in them to much times they’re disgusting and to scaruy
@crimeinvest6523 Жыл бұрын
The wing of the A321ceo looks much better than the A320ceo. Especially when sitting just behind the wing. A321ceo > A320ceo
@spreal64922 жыл бұрын
the a320 is the cutest plane on gods green earth
@Syntim8 Жыл бұрын
noa menans new engine iperstion not new engine options
@williamerazo39212 жыл бұрын
If I was a fleets. It will be A318 and A321XLR
@abdullahmohd26472 жыл бұрын
Wizz air A321 neo Daily flight MCT - AUH
@ekuche83352 жыл бұрын
Not a contest…. A321…. You can always fly with less people but you can’t add capacity…. Meaning a A321 can fly the same as a A320 BUT can then if needed carry more…. This is a stupid argument….. A321
@sorennorgaard72346 ай бұрын
Airbus 321 xlr neo airbus 350 1000 neo airbus 220 300 Neo airbus 380 neo
@FIFA-ox2wk8 ай бұрын
Feb 1987
@ChristopherBurtraw2 жыл бұрын
I just want to fly in any NEO. I've only ever flown 319 and 320 CEOs and they're my least favorite plane to ride after the all MDs were retired, I'm apparently one of the few that prefer the 737 to the 320 CEOs. On that note, I'd also like to fly on the MAX to compare to the NEO.
@davidgrant88242 жыл бұрын
what plane is better, not best
@sinada54442 жыл бұрын
Of course A321neo!
@wasted-blaster.2 жыл бұрын
a lot of the questions being asked nowadays on this channel are irrelevant which is best between X&Y? really? both aircraft have a role to play and both are very good at those roles and bring the manufacturer and airlines the profits they are searching for.
@MerkyAviation112 жыл бұрын
The A321neo easily
@ILoveQazaqstan2 жыл бұрын
I’ve flown an a320neo on Aeroflot a few months before Putler’s ravage against Ukraine and sanctions