My flight club is getting 2 of those this summer in France ! I can’t wait to try it out
@tasogare7282 жыл бұрын
Très intéressant cet avion! Quel est le nom de votre club? Je cherche à l'essayer aussi !
@JohnSmith-nh9pm2 жыл бұрын
@@tasogare728 it's the Aeroclub Jean Bertin at Chavenay (LFPX). However i think we'll only be able to try them at the end of the summer, they have to form the instructors on the plane and all beforehand.
@tasogare7282 жыл бұрын
@@JohnSmith-nh9pm Amazing! Anytime this year is great, I will come to see you guys in fall ;)
@rossiFandallas2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely beautiful. Would love to have one.
@romeodelta42752 жыл бұрын
I know this company and this aircraft : just perfect !
@onedelish2 жыл бұрын
Nice plane !
@Z06C52 жыл бұрын
Good looking plane.
@Skiridr222 жыл бұрын
Love this aircraft and all the tech he crammed in that small form, great episode Mike. 👍🏾👍🏾
@thutothekiso84802 жыл бұрын
This a/c I would easily look past, but after hearing about it, it's a plane that fits my missions well.
@NSResponder2 жыл бұрын
I reallly want to see what an a like this can do with a radically simplified engine like the one that Liquid Piston is developing. LP doesn't seem to be pursuing aircraft other than UAVs currently, but they've got the best power/weight ratio ever achieved by any internal combustion engine.
@carlosaldrete49602 жыл бұрын
I can’t wait to see liquid piston offer that engine to the public at a decent price
@1dullgeek2 жыл бұрын
Wow! 150 kts at 6.6 gph?!
@jasonchinmoon22572 жыл бұрын
never seen a wing like that, very interesting
@arthurrodrigues75452 жыл бұрын
Icon A5 have one very similar as well! It’s crazy how it works when you fly it…
@NT4XT Жыл бұрын
Work of art, form and funcion. Rediculous speed given the econobox fuel burn. Wonder about the engine, fuel type. What a truckload of $$$ can do is here done.
@kevinphillips94082 жыл бұрын
Gee this is impressive. Can’t wait to see this at Oshkosh.
@MAGApepe2 жыл бұрын
nice,,,, 10:30 no trim tap on the rudder ??
@MichaelCarterShow2 жыл бұрын
Interestin model as alwayz. #salute my gud brotha!!!!
@Cornstalker72732 жыл бұрын
Great video. Liked the dual airfoil explanation. Sexy as heck plane.
@philipgledhill72272 жыл бұрын
I mojo hope you are well buddy. What a awesome plane. It would be ideal for philip. Philip loves the colours. Awesome presentation. And it would be ideal for learning in.philip will have to get is numbers on the lottery next week. Take care and happy flying to you all philip.
@okhera12 жыл бұрын
Very Nice Bro! Get Good People/Pilots!
@kenethsedgwick85962 жыл бұрын
Is there a Yaw damper ?
@djwashx2 жыл бұрын
really nice
@Skiridr222 жыл бұрын
I wonder if you could add a second tank
@g.zoltan2 жыл бұрын
Going that radical in spin protection. Might be safe, but for instructing, you would want to do spin exercises, right?
@ninjaroo8822 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of Diamond.
@raynaldmeisner83722 жыл бұрын
Existe t-t’il avec train rentrant?
@markh72882 жыл бұрын
How comfortable would a 6’4” pilot be? What is the maximum weight of these aircraft, what is their useful load?
@srqamt2 жыл бұрын
6'4" is most likely the limit of real comfort in the cockpit. Payload with full fuel is about 500lbs in the 915
@bowzist2 жыл бұрын
Looks like a cirrus had a baby with a Diamond 😬
@mikephillips93112 жыл бұрын
Really need subtitles
@francisagosh21752 жыл бұрын
Does this aircraft come as a kit and you have to build it or can you buy one already manufactured?
@romeodelta42752 жыл бұрын
no kit
@DanFrederiksen2 жыл бұрын
It's an interesting premise to single piece mold the entire fuselage to make manufacture radically easier however the premise then falls apart when they land at a price higher than any other LSA plane. There is a sharp disconnect there. That concept doesn't fly. Puns intended :) 240k€ for the 912 and 300+ for 915. German made FK14 polaris is around 138k, also has ballistic chute and cruise at 134kts with the 912 and a 915 version coming. The Risen 915 can cruise at 212kts@9500 and even go to 250kts if you feel like using oxygen. That's just vastly superior at or below the Elixir price. The price is a little too comfortable for a canoe with wings and a briggs and stratton.
@baomao72432 жыл бұрын
I agree. Using DFM to reduce part count and nearly eliminate assembly seems like a potentially compelling idea.
@srqamt2 жыл бұрын
There's something to be said for the avionics package though, and the fact that this is part 23, not LSA
@DanFrederiksen2 жыл бұрын
@@srqamt but part 23 shouldn't really cost anything on such a plane, I figure it's more an attempt to justify the very high price. And what does it really give you? technically the passenger can be a paying customer? but how big is that usage and again, shouldn't cost anything. It's a one time cost for them and for this small plane with modest part count, possibly a modest expense. Didn't involve FAA if it's just a transferred approval from EASA. And the 100 grand difference between 912 and 915 version. Avionics probably can't explain that.
@srqamt2 жыл бұрын
@@DanFrederiksen the certificate and the process is very expensive, and flight schools could use the hell out of this thing, no? Imagine buying a fleet of these and cutting your maintenance and fuel costs in half, versus scouring the internet for warriors and skyhawks with less than 6000 hours on the airframe. The avionics alone in the 915 in worth 150k installed.
@DanFrederiksen2 жыл бұрын
@@srqamt I don't know if normal LSAs can also be used for flight schools, they can be used to build hours for PPL afaik. but again it would be a technicality they use to justify the high price, not real merit. And it is especially poignant given the construction method is touted to be cost effective. they are the enemy of progress this way. While claiming progress.
@jamesmackinlay44772 жыл бұрын
Nice plane very well done but I would not want to be in solid IFR in that plane like a little more meat in the sky.
@280zjammer2 жыл бұрын
Prices still keeping common people out of aviation. It's an awesome looking airplane but I don't see ever being able to afford it. FYI, I make decent money. As much as I want it, I just can't pay that much for anything other than a house.
@CyrilDeretz2 жыл бұрын
You'd be surprised. This one will be more affordable than equivalent competition. The price of a sports car probably
@280zjammer2 жыл бұрын
@@CyrilDeretz they said it's over a hundred thousand dollars.
@MikeHawkHurtz2 жыл бұрын
13:06 He literally said 235k euros for the 100hp one (the green one next to this one) and 300-400k euros for the one being shown. Did you guys even pay attention?
@antoniog98142 жыл бұрын
@@MikeHawkHurtz Right, and 235ke = $240,814. Which goes to 280z's comment of being more than $100k. What part of that did you not get?
@AirplaneFreak10002 жыл бұрын
Why cant certificated aircraft be like this cessna piper come onnnnnnnnnnnn pleaseeeeeee
@BobbyChastain2 жыл бұрын
“I’m French.” Yup. Figured that out pretty quickly. 😜
@panibodo2 жыл бұрын
How about your French??
@BobbyChastain2 жыл бұрын
@@panibodo ?
@Rich62702 жыл бұрын
Sinking GA for the average pilot through ridiculous pricing,expensive construct methods and materials,aviation has outpriced itself through over regulation and playing the safety tune to extract even more costs,growing up between YSBK and YSRI and learning to fly at the now gone YSFS aviation was alive in my area with pilots being very active throughout the 80,s 90,s. I live at same residence today being Saturday,used to be alive with aviation from transports and visiting fighters to Richmond to the abundance of GA out of Schofields and Bankstown.Have been relaxing this morning watching mojo and other vids for around 4hrs and haven’t heard a single aircraft military or GA,aviation GA anyway in Sydney is dead I can hear the silence.
@galactictomato14342 жыл бұрын
Looks like a plane for small to medium sized people only.
@allanloiselle7290 Жыл бұрын
By my calculations, at cruising speed of 150 knots, it's burning about the same as my wife's Buick.
@Aero_Flight512 жыл бұрын
It is the plane that anyone can fly but it is not the plane that anyone can afford
@eprohoda2 жыл бұрын
broth~ Like,unusaul - :)
@cw48422 жыл бұрын
oh its a french brand
@davidwright8732 жыл бұрын
thats a sexy ass plane!!! imho....
@Recklessness972 жыл бұрын
$322k - $429k USD for that!? I'm no pilot or airplane broker but I'm sure you could get something similar for a much better price sheesh. No wonder there's a pilot shortage.... it's expensive to even try and get into aviation.
@rossiFandallas2 жыл бұрын
A used, but comparable 2016 CIRRUS SR22T-G5 GTS will be between $800,000 to $1,000,000 US. So these planes are indeed a bargain.
@Recklessness972 жыл бұрын
@@rossiFandallas Your correct, just took a look. Not a surprise the aviation community is getting smaller and smaller and older and older. Only old money can afford these planes. You'd think someone would manufacture an affordable non-experimental plane for the average Joe... but I guess that's not where the money is at. Guess if you're not raking in the dough your stuck with the 1964 150 with 12000 total hours.
@EJWash572 жыл бұрын
@@Recklessness97 It's called Liability Insurance. Lawsuits killed light, general aviation in the U.S. Resale prices of older light aircraft is all supply and demand.
@Recklessness972 жыл бұрын
@@EJWash57 I just read an interesting article about the decline of general aviation and how liability insurance played a role among other things. It makes sense, thanks for bring it up :). Yes, I can see why old but maintained aircraft hold value.
@EJWash572 жыл бұрын
@@Recklessness97 Trust me, I agree with you. I have no idea how the average wage-earner can afford to learn how to fly, let alone buy and maintain an airplane. I'm fortunate to have my "air-knocker" ('75 Decathlon). I'm going Experimental because it's the only way to afford a new airframe with modern avionics, and cross-country performance.
@yacahumax14312 жыл бұрын
400K Euros? Ouch.
@chantereaudominique8855 Жыл бұрын
Don’t forget engine is a rotax. 400000€/ Rotax, weird.
@okhera12 жыл бұрын
ALHAMDULILLAH(SWT)- ASTAGHFIRULLAH(SWT).
@EJWash572 жыл бұрын
300K-400K Euros? $322-$429 US dollars. Er... No. Nice looking, but in the same category, I'd go with a (basic) Van's RV-12 for $125K.
@PhilipFly112 жыл бұрын
The Vans RV-12 and the Elixir are not remotely equivalent aircraft. The Vans RV-12 is 'Experimental' and you have to spend a lot of your time riveting bits of aluminium together yourself. The Elixir is a 'Certified' aircraft and one of a very small handful to be certified this century because certification takes a lot of time and expense. The Elixir 912 started with a price of €150,000, with the Rotax 912iS but the cost of certification increased that to €235,000 and has a cruise speed of 125 KTAS, is intended for clubs and training. The Elixir 915 has the turbocharged 915iS engine, has a cruise speed of 160 KTAS, and is intended for touring ie getting 2 people from A to B. That speed is comparable to a Beechcraft Bonanza, but burning half the fuel, and it is in a whole different performance category compared to the Vans RV-12 which only has a 100 KTAS cruise. If you compare the Elixir to a Diamond DA-40, which costs about $500,000 new, the Elixir is lighter, faster, more efficient and cheaper. If you compare the Elixir to a Cessna 172 Skyhawk, which costs up to $438,000 new, the Elixir is much lighter, much faster, much more efficient and probably will be a little bit cheaper. The better comparison is with other European UltraLight aircraft like the SEA Risen, BlackWing and VL3 which have retractable gear, much more performance of 200 plus KTAS and a lower price than the Elixir 915 and less than half the purchase price and running cost of a Cirrus SR22. The unique selling point of the Elixir is the one-shot manufacturing process that allows an entire wing to be moulded in one piece without separate spars and ribs, which should have resulted in a lower cost, however, disappointingly, this does not appear to be reflected in the selling price.
@EJWash572 жыл бұрын
@@PhilipFly11 Sorry, but all those words just don't add up to the additional $200K over the RV-12. And, you compared a 2-seater to three 4-seat aircraft?
@EJWash572 жыл бұрын
Addition: Van's offers the RV-12 either ready to fly (factory built) at that $129K price tag, or as a kit. So no, you're wrong, you do not have to spend the time building the airplane yourself.
@georgek.58172 жыл бұрын
Great stuff but you should consider getting a PR guy without a French accent 😉