Small request - Could you collab with TheViper for the next tier list video? I really liked the last time when you collab with Lierey and Hearttt.
@HeraAgeofEmpires23 ай бұрын
If the above comment gets 500 likes i will ask viper to collab for next tierlist video
@mormril3 ай бұрын
Can you do a tier list for arena?
@wizard4k593 ай бұрын
@@HeraAgeofEmpires2 That would be really amazing!
@thegmer52493 ай бұрын
A deal with the enemy.
@ariisee3 ай бұрын
And then when they get to letter D, they battle to death
@mikelivingood77973 ай бұрын
"I don't know why I do so well with Turks?" I look at civ bonuses free hussar and +1 pierce armor for hussar, hmmm.
@daarom34723 ай бұрын
Turks are really underrated. Even in castle age having LC with 5 PA is huge.
@pedrocarvalho3073 ай бұрын
Free LC by the way @@daarom3472
@grandengineernathan3 ай бұрын
"They are quite solid" proceeds to place them 3rd to last
@Vince1x13 ай бұрын
Really appreciate having the civ bonus shown on screen :)
@dylanfalk32433 ай бұрын
Minus the part where the team bonus got cut off haha
@WonderousLogic23 ай бұрын
As a newer player, i have come to realize that i am learning allot more by just focusing on one civ. It was overwhelming to try and learn all the different civ bonuses. Half the time i didnt know, or even when i thought i knew, i was wrong, n the other half i wasn't fully sure how to utilize it OR support it. This showed in my win %. (I had 113 on farms/ 25 on wood thinking the farms were also producing gold, nope, it was those few lumberjacks/relics. yes this was a real match, 683 dead horses by the end) spam = light cav vs. Cavalier. This has given me a much deeper understanding of the game overall. Now when i play other civs, i am also more confidant. The biggest lesson for me was early aggression and how to balance an eco to that specific civ to support that aggression. I won 8 games yesterday/last night with no losses. And yes, i do play other civs, but i mainly am focusing on one. I just bought the expansion for the Georgians, going to play them for the first time right now!!! Time to learn my second civ!! YOUR FAULT HERA!!! thank you =D --->>Always: Great content, thank you for your time, insight, and wisdom. God bless you n yours
@pajgaj13 ай бұрын
Hi, what's your Elo?
@WonderousLogic23 ай бұрын
@@pajgaj1 650
@springlietuvismmorpg906420 күн бұрын
I find 'huns' is good for new players.
@estebanmoretti33233 ай бұрын
i'm a simple man i see aoe tierlist, i click
@TheBikeOnTheMoon3 ай бұрын
Vietnamese CA is pretty damn good. Their smooth eco, free 20%hp from the start and access to bloodline on top are really strong for CA play.
@alexandretostes90023 ай бұрын
I really like Hera's more down to earth tier lists, with a limited number of S and A tier civs. The ability to prioritize properly really stands out in tournament drafts, and Hera almost never makes questionable drafts...
@LBtheGreat3 ай бұрын
“October 2024”. Bro is coming to us from the future
@aoe4fun13 ай бұрын
11
@SSmithYT2 ай бұрын
Coming back from like a 3 year break and learned so much from this video. When I left CA was a meme, great to see my favorite civ(Mongols) and CA are S tier. So many changes over the past few years. Multiple civs I've never heard of and seen my first army of Savar the other day and had no idea what I was looking at.
@unflushablepoo82433 ай бұрын
38:10 During the Forgotten DLC mayan farms were ~14% worse than generic without wheelbarow (compared to ~2.5% before). The resource bonus also used to be 20%.
@karnazacss2 ай бұрын
Feedback: Instead of saying "I put this civ right here" be more vocal about the tier for the ones only listening. Thank you.
@Poetristi3 ай бұрын
I feel we have been waiting for a meaningful infatry buffs for ages.
@Popcornio3 ай бұрын
We have infantry buffs at home Infantry buffs are home: +1 pierce armor
@13buthead2 ай бұрын
@@Popcornio +1 pierce armor is huge though.
@meow1970-v2v3 ай бұрын
13:49 Thoughts on Hindustani Cav Archers for Cataphracts? Considering Cataphracts are harder to mass and much more expensive.
@jorgea54263 ай бұрын
CA is so expensive to upgrade. You have to open CA, you cannot go CA in imp, specially if you didn't open archers in castle age. And if you do, you die do cheap Byzantine skirms
@jasonsmith19503 ай бұрын
I'd probably use hussar/hand cannon combo. So long as you keep your hand cannons safe, it doesn't matter how many hussars you lose.
@lukasvideosify15963 ай бұрын
I would disagree with your statement that the Bulgarian eco bonus that you save 50 stone on a TC is negligible: If your opponent forces you to a tower with archers, you still can make a TC staright away in Castle Age with the 75 stone that you still have. This has proven more than just a bit helpful to me, several times.
@bloodfaceislandman3 ай бұрын
BULGARIANS TILL I DIE. I'VE NEVER EVEN HEARD OF CASTLE AGE
@aa01blue383 ай бұрын
11
@rovsea-37613 ай бұрын
Hera... Im really mad you keep putting civs right over Bulgarians..are you forgetting kreposts? Calvary attack 33%faster? Plus when konniks die???? HELLO WAKE UP... Also i have played tons of games against Franks with Bulgarians and have never lost against them with Bulgarians. MAKE ANOTHER VIDEO WITH BULGARIANS WITH MASS KREPOSTS AND KONNIKS YOU WILL SEE HOW OP THEY ARE..PLUS MILITIA RUSH WITH PIKES ARHCERS AND SKIRMS.
@GolDRoger77773 ай бұрын
@@rovsea-3761 lol, what’s your name on twitch
@CornBredCrusader3 ай бұрын
Hera if you are going to make a video about Bulgarians, you should talk more about how none of their "bonuses" are innate. Ie. you have to make an investment in order to see a small bit of power from playing them, whereas most other civs get innate bonus (ie Mongol hunt or Celt wood chopping, etc) So you have no eco bonus, and you have to invest into units and blacksmith upgrades (and UTs) to see the civ become strong, which isnt much of a bonus when both players are good at the game.
@curlywhites3 ай бұрын
I would argue Mongol hunt is just as inherent as cavalry attacking 33% faster. With the hunt you have to choose to go hunt. As for cavalry, most people are making cav anyway. It's not like you're stepping away from the meta for them.
@khaderabualhayjaa3 ай бұрын
I am in the hospital and feels a bit lonely but this is timely :) Thank you Hera
@rovsea-37613 ай бұрын
Hindustanis have HCA with every upgrade but Parthian Tactics, which should be sufficient to deal with Cataphract, although they obviously would have issues against cheap skirm/halb/camel composition.
@jackwu70283 ай бұрын
After all these years there is one civ that is permanently S tier Arabia.
@brinklight00743 ай бұрын
First? always fun to see a tier list Byz are best! (even when they arent)
@ggg212013 ай бұрын
almost!😁
@jacobwood33263 ай бұрын
Magyars in B tier, lets go!
@princehotbuns6583 ай бұрын
Great video, thanks for the content Wanted to listen while I work but found myself needing to check the screen a bit as you say “I’m putting it right here” but didn’t mention the actual tier. just some feedback. pce.
@showee33673 ай бұрын
Thanks for that Hera! I am currently searching for a bunch of civs I can choose, to play ranked game. I am too scared yet but knowing the Meta helps to choose wisely :)
@avariel39123 ай бұрын
as a fan of teuton, i will be upset very slowly
@Koenee3 ай бұрын
Could you make a follow up video where you talk about what adjustments you would make to the 3 best and 3 worst civs to make them more balanced (add/remove tech, adjust civ bonus/unique tech, maybe even add a civ bonus, etc)
@dylanfalk32433 ай бұрын
I love playing Turks on Arabia for some reason. Hearing hera talk specifically about vs Ethiopians was cathartic
@Yearofthebows243 ай бұрын
Make infantry slightly faster and have less attack lag (looking at you men-at-arms). Two easy buffs that will help balance them
@Asterix9582 ай бұрын
It would be great. I think 0.95 speed for longswordman is very good, also more bonus damage to buildings especially against castles.
@Djturd643 ай бұрын
As an Aztec main. I was dying when you guys were putting them in S or A tier, because I knew the nerfs were on the way. They have been pounded into the ground for a LONG time now. And as a 1400 Elo player I could feel them being too weak and yet they still got picked in tournaments. I’m glad you put them in C tier cause that’s where I believe they belong. I think they either need to revert some of the nerfs like bring back +5 carry or buff there archers slightly so you can use them in imp!
@Mattroid993 ай бұрын
I think they are in a good spot currently; for me the issue is thst they got nerfed while the top 10/15 15 civs now have too strong of a power level through buffs/meta changes. If the best civs were around the power of like bottom of A tier civs I think the overall viability of most civs would improve drastically
@Djturd643 ай бұрын
@@Mattroid99 I find that Aztecs have a lot of counters (gunpowder) and are in a tricky spot. If you buff there main force (eagles and monks and also eco) they just become a one trick pony that’s unstoppable. I think they need a little bit more options. Like maybe a buff to the man at arms (every civ should have better man at arms tbh) or a small buff to archers (either the last armour upgrade or thumbring) i do agree with you in that other civs are now stronger and that the meta has changed. But as someone who watched and plays ALOT of Aztecs. I have seen a major shift I there power. I think another issue is that eagles have no real counter, since man at arms just suck. So maybe a major buff to them (I think they should cost -20 food) would help Aztecs give the them more options AND actually be a counter to eagles
@Mattroid993 ай бұрын
@@Djturd64 100% agreed that the Militia line should be changed (I would propose a split personally, make a very cheap, throwable unit that is easy to mass and a versatile, more expensive one) but is an universal change that should be made and it could be troublesome for these three civs. As Meso civs you kinda always suffer against good Gunpowder, but personally I like much more how Aztecs are balance wise compared to Incas and Mayans that are too strong yet for different reasons (Stupid eco and one/two trick composition for Mayans, cheap counters unit for everything for Incas). That being said I wouldn't mind a small buff either, perhaps Thumb Ring (Although is kinda unique of a feature for a Meso civ) or even give them more starting Gold (Like 100 total?) to make the early Feudal Age a bit stronger
@daarom34723 ай бұрын
I honestly wouldnt mind the devs slightly buffing elite eagle to say 70 hp and nerfing El Dorado to 30 hp extra. Also maybe give aztecs last archer armor.
@Popcornio3 ай бұрын
A bunch of tiny nerfs that have added up over time and power creep from newer civs leave Aztecs in a sub-par spot.
@ronaldstanley51693 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video future Hera!
@mikelivingood77973 ай бұрын
I did not see your video about using civ bonuses until a day later, so I hope my question can be answered here. Why do people not seem to use hand cannoneers with civs that have bonuses?
@PauxloE3 ай бұрын
I guess Poles would need something like "villagers can garrison in folwarks" to help them use that folwark bonus more?
@k5555-b4f3 ай бұрын
interesting idea, but i think it defeats the purpose/trade off of having exposed vills in exchange for pretty solid food bonus especially in early to early-mid game
@youcanthandlethetruth54333 ай бұрын
You just need to know how to play it. Watched a game recently and this dude didn't play it right. He was wide open using multiple folwarks early. Gotta be super walled early and slowly build up the forward advantage. For the start just the 8 around the berry mill is fine. You need the wood for walls and defense. No point rushing the 2nd folwark and dying because you overinvested
@FLTG133 ай бұрын
Hold on… this is a great idea…
@curlywhites3 ай бұрын
Exactly what crossed my mind when he mentioned exposed villagers. I mean, the Khmer can garrison inside houses, why not the Poles inside a bigger building that provides housing?
@streamofthought86623 ай бұрын
goth also gets rekt by cataphract. the bane of my existence lol
@evanjacob84633 ай бұрын
@Hera As always I skip to the end of your tier list video to see the whole list then watch individual civs. Does anyone else do this?
@skipper4723 ай бұрын
Vikings being B tier is very surprising. Haven't they always been rated S tier or top A tier on Arabia for 1v1s? And they've not been nerfed as of late, so they should still be up there. Free wheelbarrow and handcart is very strong.
@_Ardamax3 ай бұрын
Theres been a period of time where they dropped off massively because thumb ring was taken away. Relatively recently they've received the imp tech which gives archers +1 att.
@Calgaryman103 ай бұрын
Archers are off meta atm and the swordline is still not good enough. That's the reason. Also why Aztecs have dropped so much, former S tier civ 4ever
@Calgaryman103 ай бұрын
Meta is CA or knight/skirm where archers civ suffer
@breg59933 ай бұрын
Hot take: give Celts squires.
@johanybueno36918 күн бұрын
Awesome video. Thanks for the high quality content, you’re my favorite aoe content creator ❤.
@darwinyadav25313 ай бұрын
Get well soon Hera
@OwenLeBlanc-l7h3 ай бұрын
I think we need to see some really creative thinking to bring up infantry civs. It's sad to see them so low. At least Romans do OK statistically on win rate.
@donaldfarquar3 ай бұрын
Hera getting so fast he's already in October 11
@Glioper2 ай бұрын
Bulgarians having -50% stone cost on Town Centers, almost looks like meme bonus
@aspirenux85993 ай бұрын
Arena, next? ❤
@Hemerushi3 ай бұрын
Again, always fun to view your tier-lists. Could you do a 2v2 or other teamplay ranking as well?
@youcanthandlethetruth54333 ай бұрын
You gotta play Poles like Burgundians. Scouts into walls and defensive skirms. Into CA or knights. Or even arb obuch
@harjot213 ай бұрын
i think Dravidians can be placed a couple of spots higher. They have solid military options, Wootz Steel Light cav is underrated in my opinion, with very strong elephant archers. Another one would be placing Hindustanis one place down, purely due to the lack of halbs if they run out of gold.
@ignaciopsaavedra2 ай бұрын
42:44 Villavicencio Moment 😆
@estebanmoretti33233 ай бұрын
i would've been nice if you added the meta shift video like a note on the vid o in the description. i'll check it out anyway
@veyron63692 ай бұрын
Thanks! Please make another one for 4v4 on closed maps.
@Dnw153 ай бұрын
GOOD GAME
@bombrman19943 ай бұрын
I think scout rushing vs hindustanis might be challenge if they know they can do their camels mass and win
@icarian5533 ай бұрын
Wouldn't CA and stirrup hussar be a decent late game comp for Bulgarians? Only thing they miss is last archer armor. Or against camel/cav civ they could go halb instead of hussar.
@tomascanevaro42923 ай бұрын
Hindustanis could go heavy ca vs catas. But then byz could go catas + skirms. Maybe heavy ca + hussar could work.
@blackhairedgees3 ай бұрын
Hey hera, 13:25 I might be wrong but Hindustani can CA cataphracts
@michaelholliday62162 ай бұрын
Me watching two of your videos at the same time....
@youcanthandlethetruth54333 ай бұрын
Word of the day: anti meta
@h3m753 ай бұрын
So how does grinding the ladder as georgians make you a better player but doing the same thing with non-meta strategies doesnt
@khaledbenali57363 ай бұрын
Given the CA meta switch, I'm surprised that berbers are not higher on the list.
@caper9633 ай бұрын
You made video were you told us Poles are the best civ. You said that all they need is nerf of stone mining and folwark. Next patch Poles were nerfed, both folwark and stone to gold ratio nerfed. And suddenly Poles civ was killed.
@Mattroid993 ай бұрын
Arabia gens got way more open too, that I think was the real killer as Poles is one of the very few civs that absolutely need a very good map to even try to play the game. Buffing the Folwark back to the previous amount also risk to make their already absurd lategame (Which I would even argue should be nerfed for maps like Arena)
@youcanthandlethetruth54333 ай бұрын
Poles is still the best civ. People just force it to be something it's not by being super open and aggressive. That's like using Malay and going knights then complaining why is Malay bad
@timii0723 ай бұрын
Is the lack of any new patch since April worrying?
@Static-GG3 ай бұрын
"They are quite solid" places them in the bottom of sub par, shhhh cant let them know.
@rovsea-37613 ай бұрын
For me personally, I would take Turks out of viable. While in theory they should be a viable civ in my opinion, they were the only civ to never even be drafted in the SAX Cup main event, meaning that none of the players in that event thought it was viable, even with 12 random bans opening up picks quite a bit more than usual.
@EneldoSancocho3 ай бұрын
How about instead of a tier list Hera does the complete partial ordered graph of civs? There are 990 different matchups so I guess the video would be around 20 hours long... Great content idea if I may say so myself
@SufferToResist3 ай бұрын
Where is that byantine vs hindutani cataphract game?
@showee33673 ай бұрын
By the way, I am a statistics guy and when I see the difference between every guide I saw and the stats of what people are choosing as civs. Most of the time it's not matching at all, especially for lower ELO. I am not here to critic or what so ever, I just would like your point of view on that. For exemple, under 850 ELO, Sicilians have 56.88% win rate (wow), most pick are Franks (I can get that) and Georgians have just 9,524/437,413 pick which is one of the lowest. At 1900+ (which represent 1% of the players) picks and win rate are pretty balanced as I guess most of you are playing random at this level. Maybe my sources are bad our i miscalculated but I am pretty sure I am close to the reality. I am also not sure if other people would be interested by such a video. Please like if this sounds like a good idea :)
@curlywhites3 ай бұрын
Wait, did you suggest a video idea in here somewhere? I'm confused. And if it's about the stats and numbers, then Spirit of the Law would be someone to go to for it.
@Olifantenstaart2 ай бұрын
RIP Bulgars
@t.a.22023 ай бұрын
You can sell early 100 stone for 90 gold with bulgarians.. thats a eco bonus😉😅
@alejandrocanelo30583 ай бұрын
what about CA + hussars with hindustanis to counter byz?
@Mattroid993 ай бұрын
I think Poles are unquestionably the worst civ in Arabia right now and I believe there are a couple of reasons for it that you didn't mention. Comparing them to the other D tier civ we have, while Bulgarians fall very short in tech tree limitations and predictable options, the initiative and concrete potential to do damage from the get go is at least always there. Poles on the other hand have no initiative, need a very good map AND safe berries to even be playable, even if both conditions are met the civ starts to kick in at minute 25/30, and even there they have some very concrete long term issues vs CAs as they lack both the final Archer and Cavalry armor. They have much higher potential than almost any civ but no other civ in the game needs this much map luck, setup involved and time to function. Also this is a bit outside the scope but I think is much easier to fix something like Sicilians's (Like access to Thumb Ring and cheaper Hauberk) and Bulgarians's issues (Like making TCs not cost Stone and have Stirrups affect CAs) to make them decent than to fix Poles, which need a fundamental redesign to the Folwark gimmick on top of proper lategame tuning. Much like Britons is a civ that really feels stuck back in a time where timings were much less of a key priority and Arabia gens were way more wallable and not hilly wastelands like nowadays.
@youcanthandlethetruth54333 ай бұрын
Not even close. Poles just need a different mindset to play instead of force feeding it into the fast feudal aggressive meta. Like burgundians you need to be defensive. It's actually very easy to full wall with defensive skirms while slowly pulling ahead with folwarks before exploding into the mass cavalier power spike. Or arbs/CA and hussar. But if you want to give it this negative press all the better for me if they buff it as a Poles main 11
@Mattroid993 ай бұрын
@@youcanthandlethetruth5433Of course you need to open defensive, no one said the opposite. The civ will still make your life way harder though, Burgundians by comparision don't have to go for awkward walls and the initial defense pays itself very fast. With Poles though if the map is very open and berries are in the middle of nowhere is almost always gg on the spot, you cannot full wall and protect that and is the majority of Arabia gens nowadays. And the Knight spam comes in at min 30, not min 23 like the Burgundian Cavalier, so the opponent can still 1TC push you in castle for a while. Is pretty clear that the civ needs a heavy redesign honestly. Their lategame is completely unfair (And I would argue it should be nerfed quite a lot), but due to the Folwark gimmick the first parts of the game are often borderline unplayable in any map that you cannot full wall.
@youcanthandlethetruth54333 ай бұрын
@@Mattroid99 lets 1v1 I'll show you how to play Poles. Nobody has pushed me off berries as Poles in the last 50 games probably
@Mattroid993 ай бұрын
@@youcanthandlethetruth5433 I don't believe that random 1v1s are the best way to prove so, but why not. What is your level?
@youcanthandlethetruth54333 ай бұрын
@@Mattroid99 OK I can be on 13 hours from now. GN = 1v1 mattroid Password = mattroid
@ar1sm703 ай бұрын
Major sadge that Bulgarians are alone at the bottom tier... Kreposts are so damn cool and the Konnik is resurrection mechanic is unique... I wish the devs do something to help them!
@casioak16832 ай бұрын
Slavs is quite good in maps like Arabia 1v1. Especially if you collect most the relics, you just have to focus on foods, woods, and stones for massing Boyars & placing cheap castles. The problem is, it's a boring civ to play with lack of bombard cannon, arbalest, and hand cannonneer
@louispearson83063 ай бұрын
ive played britons for like 4 years straight and I started losing every game i return. I swapped to Ethiopians and won 5 in a row :D
@FDJUwe3 ай бұрын
Byzantine clearly the best civ. Best counter units (which means they beat everyone) and unique unit that can literally not be countered. Hello?????
@martinm.64723 ай бұрын
Ranged units destroy cataphracts.
@zxylo7862 ай бұрын
Byzantines get crap cavalry. They are basically a glorofied archer civ with junk camels and anti-infantry cavalry (as if that will ever be useful). Just make archers and your own hussars and you win the game.
@bassegoder3 ай бұрын
Emmm Aztecs defensive castle drop into atatl, one side defended by the castle, the other by the skirms, good luck CA outranged by 2 range levels. Then you boom and spam eagles into enemy economy
@irvinehd15252 ай бұрын
Maybe we can do that for Nomad as Well? :)
@Combinebobnt3 ай бұрын
Cumans 2tc + tower rush not scary on arabia?
@ggg212013 ай бұрын
You say Saracens virtue is they have nothing bad to say about them other than not having a top-tier bonus that gives them free wins, but isn't being weak to archer civs something bad to say about them?
@灰烬-u8t3 ай бұрын
Literally everytime pro pick Bulgarians: INSTANT WORST CIV
@ezio_aoe8213 ай бұрын
Georgians
@youcanthandlethetruth54333 ай бұрын
Based Georgia banned LGBT and trans propaganda 👑
@forsakenquery3 ай бұрын
Hera big question - why is Japanese so bad in a CA meta when their CA counters other CA??
@k5555-b4f3 ай бұрын
still hoping Burmese will be S tier one day :(
@jeremybrowne92213 ай бұрын
It is only September
@martinm.64723 ай бұрын
Dravidians will be S tier the day they finally find the taco.
@ariisee3 ай бұрын
The tierlist is slightly incorrect. Goths are an S+ tier civilization. Other than that, great video!
@IndexInvestingWithCole3 ай бұрын
Did you mean Bengalis are anti-meta or off-meta?
@magiking963 ай бұрын
"Mayans if played correctly can beat Hindustanis" isn't Hindustanis UU straight up a counter to Mayans? I dont see any unit they can do that counters Ghulam
@santiagowu536527 күн бұрын
I feel bad about vikings, cause is my favorite civ.
@thanos914103 ай бұрын
he said what about Bulgarians?
@evangeloskostopoulos81733 ай бұрын
I would put Armenians on C-D on Arabia, one of the worst possible civs for that map imho - no units to make, really
@Calgaryman103 ай бұрын
I thought Gbetos are considered poor UU
@jean-rogernosecondname12813 ай бұрын
Anybody knows why aoe2 has been 5+ months without any patch? Aoe2 content creators that make tier list vids may run out of possibilities if game never updates lol.
@mrpotaehead3 ай бұрын
Fake News! Bulgarians and Konniks are op!
@javierramos1852 ай бұрын
How can a Gurjara win against an Inca? It's a complete civ win
@HuNgerforrock2 ай бұрын
magyars being only viable with CA meta :( I wish they get a small mid game eco bonus to make them more smooth to play
@gabriel84511Ай бұрын
Bengalis are top tier in Arena
@kik888le3 ай бұрын
I always hated those videos just because pros never told Japanese are trash, everybody just keeps arguing - wow you save 200 wood, it does not matter your cav is trash, close to no eco bonus, no bbc, trash uu, trash siege. Thank you very much edit: also, is spearmen skirm meta dead? I always love to play lith, koreans, byz and just spam in feudal
@alessandrodeluca12452 ай бұрын
I think that old civs added values should be renovated at structure level. New cives have factors like hp regeneration, bonus from higher position, mule carts, etc etc etc. Franks and britons charts are pathetic nowadays, come on, it's not random that new civ like Georgians are the best (..Georgians..!?) And also details like britons not having halab make no sense, which European Civ should not have!?
@hapoter1233 ай бұрын
Really don’t know why not nerf to Chinese? OP for so long time
@yahm0n3 ай бұрын
Saracens is B tier when you got a B in math.
@lumptydumpty69922 ай бұрын
Georgians are great, but they die to top tier CA. As a 1600 exclusive Tatar player, I have a 65% win rate against them.
@lumptydumpty69922 ай бұрын
The only time I lost not making mistakes on my end my opponent went high eco and towers into svar tower, halb, cavalier, and hussar push. Those towers are nuts
@lumptydumpty69922 ай бұрын
Shoutout MattyP, that was a crazy solution to the fact Monaspa die hard to CA.