The BEST F1 CARS in each ENGINE (🔥Turbo & Naturally Aspirated🔥)

[@Michalskyeye]

Mindblowing seeing how fast Ferrari 2004 is. Without DRS and hybrid tech still pulling away from mercedes

[@f1virtualfilms]

The F2004 has around 20km/h more than the W11 on the straights.

[@israeljoao5532]

The 2004 cars, in addition to being fast on the straight, were smaller and shorter, and had less drag. If it were the w7 Things would be more balanced on the straights

[@felipelomar5388]

The 2004 is about 150kg lighter too

[@RobotTorzo]

tech and innovation is not much if the weight advantage is severe. I would say the W11 is very impressive despite all the limitations it has.

[@franciscoderosas1647]

U forgot a more important "without": slicks

[@J.M.Sharpie]

That V8 on the corners sounds so Brutal. That sound there is one of the reasons why I loved the V8 Era.

[@LCRLive687]

The high revving N-A V10 rules!. And the V12 sounds the nicest. V10 second place in sound, but first place in full out brutality.

[@JustANormalChannel46]

YES, IM SOOO HAPPY WITH THIS!!, i think its bcz of my idea from that video that i commented on? well anyways, ITS AMAZING!!

[@f1virtualfilms]

There were some very similar suggestions. If you were one of them, thank you again.

[@Arado_Missile]

Why can’t we use silverstone instead of monza for once to see who really is king in speed and cornering smh smh

[@f1virtualfilms]

Why the W11 would by far be the winner. In Monza things are more balanced for all cars.

[@Arado_Missile]

@@f1virtualfilms not even with the v8 double diffuser?

[@f1virtualfilms]

@@Arado_Missile If you're talking about Brawn GP, ​​you had to choose between it and the Red Bull RB7. And the RB7 was a superior car.

[@Arado_Missile]

@@f1virtualfilms k

[@themilitant1662]

@@f1virtualfilmsit wouldn’t be balanced,the 2012 v8 is much slower in terms of pace,it excelled at cornering and not pace

[@nelisvanwieren9508]

Just goes to show those V10 F1 cars were monsters

[@mEmEzMaN...]

W11 would've passes barely had the f2004 not blocked at the last corners

[@TenorCantusFirmus]

1950s supercharged I8s (ALFA Romeo 158), '60s 1.5 V6s (Lotus 25) and '70s 3.5 V8s (Lotus 72 or McLaren M23) and Flat-12s (Ferrari 312T2): "Are we jokes to you?..."

[@f1virtualfilms]

In fact, I didn't put those engines in them because I wanted a more balanced race, something that with cars from the 50s, 60s and 70s they would be far behind.

[@TenorCantusFirmus]

@@f1virtualfilms Still, would have been interesting to see.

[@TheUsmc0802]

The BMW/Williams is arguably the best V10 car of that era. They just had the wrong Schumacher driving, and JPM too manic but still awesome lol.

[@hobbyracer2814]

I wouldn't fully agree with that. The Ferraris were the overall better cars. Not really in quali, but definitely in race conditions. The BMW-Williams was often very fast in quali, but couldn't match the race pace of Ferrari. Especially the 2001, 2002 and 2004 Ferrari were basically unbeatable Also I wouldn't agree on blaming the drivers for that. Quite often, when williams had a chance of winning, they broke down. Ralf Schumacher was often stated as being as fast as Michael, but chouldn't show it, as he never got the chance to drive a championship winning car. For JPM I agree, even as a fan of him

[@purebloodsunite7489]

The BMW was a monster but the car was average.

[@Whyteeford]

Put slicks on the F2004, and it would corner a good 20kph faster

[@1010thechamp]

And the right aero setup for Monza, with slicks, unbeatable, would have walked the Merc on the straights, 365kph on the main straight.

[@LucasHizo]

V10 s The Real Monster of F1, Best Ferrari Ever

[@nosajm9bys]

This is strange because the 2024 cars are smashing record laps, though for not all circuits. I've seen quite a few of your videos, but the much loved 2004 Ferrari seems to be beating them each time. I was at the Monza GP that year (at the beginning of the pits, pits side) and also bought the puma trainers the pit crew were wearing that year 😀

[@f1virtualfilms]

That's cool, man. I'm glad you follow the channel and congratulations on Puma trainers!

[@nosajm9bys]

😂 That was 2004, it's been living on a landfill somewhere for 10 years now.

[@noorazfaruddin467]

F1 dream racing😍

[@VollstandigErleuchtung]

If the w11 didn't go off line into the final corner, he could have gotten a much better exit and pulled a switch back on the f2004, maybe gotten a photo finish

[@f1virtualfilms]

It really would be an epic ending. Thanks for watching my friend

[@OthonDutra]

I was really rooting for the MP4/6 in the start, but, it wasn't Ayrton behind the wheel.....

[@nvcnc]

makes you wonder what the w11 would be able to do without fuel restrictions. Even just a little bit more fuel flow and it would add another 100-200hp easily

[@ricardopralon4763]

Choosing the MP4/4 as Turbo 1.5 rules sample isn't a good choice, by the 88 rules the Turbos were limited to 2.5 BAR and 150 kg of fuel, that means that the 3.5 l Honda V10 that Mclaren used in next year ( 1989) start about 40 hp stronger just out of the box having 690 hp, when the 1.5 V6 had 650 hp in the racing trim. To be honest with real turbo Cars potentials it's far better use 1987 Willams-Honda, that was limited at 4 BAR or the 86 model that was no boost limit. The 88 F1 average times in the majority of circuits are 4s slower than 87.

[@f1virtualfilms]

I agree with everything you said, but the idea of the video is to have the best cars with each engine, and the MP4-4 was better and much more dominant than any other car with a V6 Turbo engine.

[@ricardopralon4763]

@@f1virtualfilms Ok, but in fact it was dominant against only 2 other team that used V6 turbos that year, Ferrari and Lotus-Honda. The rest of grid used V8 aspirated engine and Arrows Megatron BMW 4 inline turbo.

[@double.u1577]

Unfortunate to not see some "experimental" designs, such as the H16 engines. Also the I4 BMW engines in the Benetton and Brabham of the early-mid 80s are missing. Maybe the flat 12 Ferraris of the 70s too and some more 50s and 60s cars, but then it would clutter up super quick, so I understand why you may not have picked more cars.

[@savvioo]

W11 was absolutly monster

[@henryhallam5270]

Yet still got wrecked by a 20 year old car with 2x less mechanical grip in the tires and with less power than in qualifying.

[@ernest_oto495]

@@henryhallam5270 your acting like it was not last and had to pass the slower cars first

[@henryhallam5270]

@@ernest_oto495 It still got beaten, with all of those things in mind

[@jblcharge3_basstester]

​@@henryhallam5270if you gave it 1 more lap it wouldve beaten the f2004, it gained 1.7s in one lap thats mad crazy

[@henryhallam5270]

@@jblcharge3_basstester I’m not denying that, it’s still just impressive that it won with awful tires and race power which is 100hp less than qualifying power, plus 20 years of development, the w11 is great but not as good as the f2004

[@President_Nixon]

might be outright to ask but i know this is assetto corsa, are u fine if u can hmu w/ the mods?

[@msadhvith9]

What Sim or game is this?

[@f1virtualfilms]

Assetto Corsa

[@maxmuller9194]

Toller Lauf!

[@f1virtualfilms]

Nochmals vielen Dank, mein Freund

[@ifeeIcoke]

Wait the MP4/4 is only 600+ HP 😔?

[@sebastiancalderonpacheco8218]

I think its the race trim

[@MariaAngelyRodriguez]

It’s usually said to be 675 hp, so race trim is gonna be a little slower I believe

[@peeturpain9379]

Lmao the f2004 had close to 830hp not 950 lmao

[@f1virtualfilms]

The power of the F2004 alternated between 850 and 950HP between Qualifying and Races.

[@peeturpain9379]

@@f1virtualfilms No it didnt, the most powerful V10 was BMW's and it produced 850hp. As someone who actually watched F1 in the early 2000s, I would know.

[@f1virtualfilms]

@@peeturpain9379 Unfortunately, the information varies a lot. The team or factory never provides the completely correct power

[@purebloodsunite7489]

@@peeturpain9379 No the BMW reached 880bhp in 2001 according to bmw, and eventually 950bhp+ in 2004.

[@israeljoao5532]

I missed Rb19

[@mOries0795]

W11 is faster

[@soniacandido3606]

Piloto??

[@f1virtualfilms]

Não entendi a pergunta

[@TedReed-h3p]

Why no 92 Williams Renaults on the grid?? BS video.

[@MattyMarra81]

Take the DRS out and the hybrid engine is nothing

[@Frank_golfstein]

In your face Senna.. 😁😁😁😁😁. Now in Silverstone or Spa.

[@vitordeandrade664]

MP4/4 1000+ HP*

[@rideroundandstuff]

no, the 1988 turbos were heavily restricted

[@f1virtualfilms]

No friend. These powers were close to 1000hp until 1987. In 1988 the power was reduced.

[@RandomGuy37]

​​@@f1virtualfilmsYeah. In 1986 at qualifying trim the BMW engines apparently produced over 1500hp. Which is absolutely insane even by today's standards. Especially from a 4-cylinder engine. Because of hitting those kinds of insane numbers, they limited the maximum boost to 4 bars in 1987 and to 2.5 bars in 1988.

[@f1virtualfilms]

@@RandomGuy37 Exactly. You summarized

[@makemystronger..freemegapi6800]

Games for PC?

[@f1virtualfilms]

Yes. Assetto Corsa