The BEST Printer You’ve NEVER Heard Of

The BEST Printer You’ve NEVER Heard Of - Marathon IDEX

Рет қаралды 14,122

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 88

@UbberMapper Ай бұрын

When i clicked on this video i was thinking that this was just another printer trying to share a spot on the market with a bunch of other printers. I now see that this machine has its own place in the market and can fullfill a few different valuable roles.

@dfoster9445 Ай бұрын

I bought this a month ago after watching your vids. Some problems with my interpretation of the instructions, but all working, and the support from Dan and the community on Discord is second to none. - This thing is also a beast for ABS printing.

@koenvanduffel2084 Ай бұрын

I run a Vcore 3.1 500 mm IDEX beta machine for 8 months now. It works great, software and mechanics. This printer takes another spin at the motion system which will limit speed and acceleration versus the Vcore quite a lot. Toolchanges on a Vcore are only a few tenths of a second (50k accel at 1000 mm/s) eliminating the need for a waste tower (at least with regular filaments). Nevertheless this is an interesting machine, especially the X-kinematic.

@tonytillman3953 Ай бұрын

I love that it is made with off the shelf parts and seems like basic Klipper!

@AndrewAHayes Ай бұрын

I would love to see an IDEX Toolchanging printer, having the best of both worlds would be most welcome! Im getting the feeling it is about time for Bambu Lab to announce a new printer, hopefully a larger X1C and hopefully a toolchanging option.

@markhenderson6587 Ай бұрын

I have pondered a IDEX with Tool changer and possible then one head going to an MMU. The trick is to set it up to cause the fastest changes to be the most common ones. So Primary on one head. Tool changers for support and other colors and if you need more colors beyond that use an MMU to feed one of the tool changer heads. It gets towards the I don't need it but I want to explore what is possible. I also an pondering a 3D printer with either a very long X or high Z for a unique use case.

@boothybuilds Ай бұрын

I think if Bambu Labs adapted their Lidar and Load cell tech to an easy set up\calibration IDEX Printer combined with their AMS for general filament support management it would provide a very affordable\interesting option to a full tool changer.

@JustinBuildsThings Ай бұрын

Search h youtube for magnetic idex. This exists

@nicholashanninen7379 15 күн бұрын

I liked this concept for a printer so much I just put an order in for one. I’d love to see one more follow up video detailing how you’ve managed to leverage the printer to make unique dual material parts and maybe recap any new issues or ongoing fixes that formbot/dan have addressed.

@HackCausality Ай бұрын

I'm concerned the response to worries about deflection being "he ran a simulation" rather than "he took measurements of the actual printer in motion". Removing the gantry around the rail while simultaneously adding the weight of the motor to the tool head is significant.

@Scrogan Ай бұрын

The gantry doesn’t move on the Z direction, so vertical wobble shouldn’t be an issue. Static sag is trivially calculated, and that’s taken into account in the mesh levelling process, unless you’re doing two identical prints.

@CorySimpson 15 күн бұрын

@@Scrogan I think the point is the only way to graduate "shouldn't" to "doesn't" is to take actual measurements

@user-uf8nn6he3e Ай бұрын

Glad idex is still alive

@emberprototypes Ай бұрын

Great video! You can also use the CXC to do manual camera-assisted calibration for XY offsets rather than setting up kTAMV entirely and it'll save you both time and improve precision. kTAMV is cool, but doing it manually is still lightyears ahead of the traditional, iterative printing method.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@emberprototypes thanks man!

@KanoUSA Ай бұрын

I have waited so long for this video to come out

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

Hopefully it was worth the wait :)

@ImaginationToForm Ай бұрын

Looks impressive. I've had always wanted a bigger IDEX with a vertical bed.

@Minimaster84 Ай бұрын

Very nice, have had it on shopping card but resumed because of custom and delivery costs from China to Germany. Now in progress to klipperize old Creator 3 buyed cheap with fried mainboard. Good for learning handling of IDEX and reduce spareparts stock. May in future Marathon will be the successor.

@sandsack123 Ай бұрын

Thank you for the "follow up" video. Your initial video caused me to order the Marathon but I have not had time for really getting into it. Would love to see what is possible quality wise as I value quality over speed.

@kaween1000 Ай бұрын

Interesting review. You did not encounter similar issues as the people at 3D Printing Canada ? Which all things summed up boiled down to : "firmware is highly unstable, on the brink of unusable even, and it forgets calibrations after power cycle, and assembling the machine took them close to 15 hours". If not, do you know if that's caused by possible improvements to the kit and firmware compard to the situation of the Marathon 3 months ago ?

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@kaween1000 there were some issues earlier on that have been resolved. That “review” was pretty misinformed in my opinion. 3 hours is a more accurate assembly time. As I mention in the video, the current state of the firmware is among the best I’ve seen on any Klipper printer.

@kaween1000 Ай бұрын

@@ygk3d Thank you for your reply. Good to know.

@justinchamberlin4195 Ай бұрын

I've been interested in the Marathon for a while now, and this video has helped solidify my plan to have this be my next printer. Until the Marathon released, the overall state of development of IDEX printers had largely stalled since Sovol released the SV04, which is surprising given the increasing attention paid to multi-color and -material printing as well as filament waste. Dr. Dan's attention to detail throughout the design is obvious, even right on down to the instructions on how to upgrade the screen. And the biggest thing for me that puts the Marathon ahead of the RatRig V-Core 4 is the relative ease of assembly...the size options RatRig has to offer are nice to have but I don't like having to do that much assembly, especially the wiring. One thing that wasn't obvious either from this video or the Vivedino website: it very much looks like the nozzle and heat break assembly uses a standard V6 nozzle but then you mentioned that it was like a Revo in its overall construction. Are the nozzle and heat break a single part that is proprietary to Vivedino or is it possible to use off-the-shelf V6 nozzles? I'd love to use either a CHT nozzle to increase the volumetric flow rate (perhaps even with one of the huge 1.8 mm CHT nozzles for extra-strong infill) or a Diamondback for worry-free printing of abrasives and high-temp materials alike.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@justinchamberlin4195 nothing about the nozzle / hot end is proprietary. I haven’t removed the nozzle to confirm but I think I was mistaken in saying that the nozzle and heat break are a one piece assembly. This hot end is compatible with those but I believe the stock hardware is just as pictured on the AliExpress page with a smooth top side heat break and threaded lower side, with a standard hardened steel v6 nozzle below it. So given that, you could replace it with any other v6 nozzle, including a CHT.

@justinchamberlin4195 Ай бұрын

@@ygk3d Awesome, that removes my last true concern. Thanks!

@boothybuilds Ай бұрын

Thank you for this clear & concise review & well done to the creator, I look forward to more of your content. With regards to the unsupported X gantry design. In my own personal experience when creating a similar but single tool head design (MGN12H)the assembly worked well on day one but over time the load curvature increased. In my case this became a bit of a vicious circle with belt tension being increased due to offset the increasing curvature and the increased belt tension adding to the rail curvature. The deflection was slight but enough to create layer shifting due the nozzle catching the filament at the most low point. I am not at all suggesting this is the case with this product\design and if there has been some very long term testing\analysis regards this feature, it is all good, just found this personally not to be the case. Could easily have been my design not the concept. In this design the belt tensioning is horizontal rather than vertical as per my more traditional Core XY 3D printed part design so may not be the case and this comment should be totally ignored has been not relevant with respect to this review. I just thought it was worth mentioning regarding a long term observation.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@boothybuilds thanks you very much and thanks for sharing your experience as well.

@3dexperiments Ай бұрын

Great review, very interesting design.

@larry527az3 Ай бұрын

It's bed size is too small for my needs. My Troodon 2 has the best bang for space with it's given bed size, really wish it had convenient two color capability though. I know, have my cake or eat it... :(

@Scrogan Ай бұрын

It’s a very nice looking printer, but as I wouldn’t use the higher throughput, I’d rather have a toolchanger with more than two options. I can only hope that the improvements made by this sort of printer and the XL’s shortcomings will be applied to a modern toolchanging printer.

@grasstreefarmer Ай бұрын

You can do simulations all you like but practical experience and measuring is always better. Using a linear guideway alone as the X axis is a bad idea and is some of the source of the bad bed height map. On my Voron 2.4 I had one of the super light X axis installed and it slowly sagged which was visible on the bed mesh as a hump in the bed. It eventually got up to 0.4mm range or more than a whole layer thickness. I swapped the X axis to a solid machined version and the bed mesh instantly went to less than 0.05mm positive and negative. The system can of course cope with the variation but it completely defeats the point of using a cast aluminium bed if the gantry is warping. Especially in an IDEX machine. You may as well use a cheap PCB bed and make the machine cheaper.. There is a lot to like about this machine otherwise so I hope they rethink it and make some changes.

@markhenderson6587 Ай бұрын

I was just looking at that printer a couple days ago. Now I think I have to have one. Thanks for the great video.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

Thanks for watching and commenting!

@marcus460 Ай бұрын

look for something else! I am sorry I bought it have not good results with it and don't have the time to start upgrading

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@marcus460 have you upgraded to the latest firmware and slicer profiles? There have been a lot of improvements since it was first released.

@slomo4056 Ай бұрын

Is there any possibility to add Input shaping? Seems Strange that they havent already included Input shaping from Stock.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@slomo4056 it uses input shaping it just doesn’t have accelerometers. The same is true of the Prusa XL. You can add your own accelerometer if you want to measure the resonances yourself, as I have shown in the video.

@ErrorTH Ай бұрын

I am thinking about IDEX for quite some time but i suspect there are some reasons behind IDEX not being mainstream. It exists for quite some time already...

@ottovonwegen442 Ай бұрын

Could you use direct input shaping in a klipper IDEX system like the Marathon?

@Roobotics Ай бұрын

Very interesting printer and configuration, though I feel like some of the x-axis gantry stuff is done in a weird way for the sake of being different, motors on the sides of the Y carriage would put them more in-line with where the forces are applied by the belts at the edges that drive the Y axis beam, also sharing a belt between the two toolheads.. that one seems like a maybe bad idea, they are constantly tweaking at each other's tension levels, subtle belt stretch etc.. klipper tunes individual toolhead resonance via shaping, but what about external forces.. like the adjacent toolhead? I can see that they turned 4x of possibly needed belt(2 loops), into a 1x length both motors now run along, but belts were never that expensive anyways. Also surprised it's not a CAN setup with motor drivers on the toolhead for both X motion and extruder, instead all discreet harnesses.

@georgschmitz8690 Ай бұрын

It took a long time after release to have at least one video on KZbin. As far as I remember the printer was available in January 2024. I considered to buy it but was not very impressed by the first reviews. I fear that development is lagging behind due to the low sales figures. At the moment I'm waiting to see what Bambulab launches and then I'll have another look to see which printer will be right for me.

@hellothere6627 Ай бұрын

I love IDEX, and hope it is the future along with tool changers. The marathon is an appealing higher level printer. If you’re looking for an entry level IDEX I recommend the LNL Tenlog D3 Pro ~$500.

@oleurgast730 Ай бұрын

Quite a nice printer. One point I do not quite understand: The bed has 3 axis like the vCore printers, so it can tilt. So actually hardwarewise it could compensate the hight of two different points. If tool 1 needs maybe +0.2 mm correction and tool 2 needs -0.1 mm, the bed could be tilted to archive exactly this to be done. Just some calculating to be done. The problem at the moment is Klipper does not have this function. However, as Klipper is contantly developed further and with the new vCore 4 Idex another great printer would profit from such a function, we might see it in future. This is unlike other Idex-printers, were you neither can tilt the bed nor the x-axis.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@oleurgast730 interesting observation! Not sure how that would work but it certainly sounds intriguing.

@Chris-oj7ro Ай бұрын

I thought you were on to something, but actually this idea may not be so easy. A height offset between the two hotends would require a different bed angle depending on the distance between then, with a steeper angle needed when they are closer. If we try to continually compensate, we'd be wiggling the bed angle left and right, which would cause an increasing offset the higher the print goes... Now having said that, I just realized that the compensation could likely be done over the first one or two layers to get a level print layer and then just continue normally. 👍

@oleurgast730 Ай бұрын

@@Chris-oj7ro On duplex mode you always have about half the bed width distance between the extruders. Even in mirror mode you need the width of one extruder in distance (about 8cm or more) between nozzle to avoid collision. So if the distance between left and right z-axis is maybe 40 cm, the difference between left and right z has to be at maximum 5 times the difference between z-mesh-offsets of extruder 0 and 1. A good bed has a maximum deviation of about 0.3 mm. So the maximum tilt to compensate would be a difference in z-hight left and right would be 1.5mm. As theoretical worst case, if the maximum deviation would occur on an 8cm x-distance (unlikely). 1.5mm on 40 cm distance is not realy an steep angle. So while the angle has to be adjusted due to the x0 and x1 positions, I see not a real problem there. Even going further up in the print without fading out the compensation in the first cm, it would still be just a theoretical maximum difference between left and right about 1.5 mm all until you reach the top. While you have 3 z-axis, for calculations you only need two, as the two z-axis on one side have same x-coordinate, so they need same correction (you tilt arround the y-axis). So if two z-coordinates on the left and one of the right, the two on the left need same correction. Lets calculate the offset of z-left and z-right for theoretical worst case, assuming following dimentions, defining middle of bed as x=0 for more easy calculation: Bed: 260mm (distance between left z and right z = 400 minus 2 times width of an extruder =2*80mm to allow full dual mode) x-position z0&1 axis: -200mm x-position z2 axis: +200mm x-position e0: 200-40 = -40mm x-position e1: 200+40 = +40mm max deviation of bed hight: 0.3mm. So this is the maximum to be compensated for. ze0_comp = -0,15mm @ x=-40 (due to mesh) ze1_comp = +0,15mm @ x =+40 (due to mesh) resulting in tilt = (0,15-(-0,15))/(40-(-40)) = 0.00375 left-z-compensation = -0.00375 * (-200)mm = -0.75 mm right-z-compensation = 0.00375 * (+200) mm = +0.75 mm Remember: It´s just the compensation for the bed mesh by intentional tilting, after z0,z1 and z2 were already adjusted to no tilt. It does not include a physical z-offset between e0 and e1. However, if you use two identical manufactured extruders with precise parts (like Revo nozzles), the physical z-offset between left and right extruder should be less than 0.2mm. If you add max diviation of the bed and physical difference of z-offset between extruders, you would still only need to compensate for 0.5mm over am minimum distance of 8 cm. So maximum tilt of 0.00625, resulting in +/- 1.25 mm in above example. The correction needed are quite smal. Maybe I was wrong - I think at least with mechancal compensated heads and a maximum tilt of 0.00375 this might inside the tolerances of a bed-slingers ability to tilt the x-axis using two z-motors without blocking. And while theoreticaly you should compensate for x-length if x-axis is tilted, with such low tilt this might not even matter... Edit: On this printer two z are in the front, one in the back. So the tilt is done by the left and right front z´s, the back one has no effect for tilting along the y. I had the positions of the vcore 3.1 in mind. But same principle.

@vim55k Ай бұрын

Can you make a video about adding a nozzle camera to a klipper like printer?

@TheFeist77 Ай бұрын

I would pay the difference for the larger screen and the camera alignment baked in.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

Perhaps they'll add those as options in the future.

@PioneerPrint3D Ай бұрын

Add two more heads and speed it up and I'm a buyer.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

👀

@Kloberman Ай бұрын

I'm not sure how that would work. A second gantry with 2 more heads? Could be interesting but I think you'd need a significantly larger X/Y footprint to take advantage of all 4 heads for quad-mirror/copy mode.

@GearSounds Ай бұрын

@@Kloberman I'm less interested in the copy mode (though I want 4 of them to copy YES!) and more interested in just four different materials printing the same, or similar parts, maybe even parts of the same item. I have a ton of multicolor prints that I would love to do in multi material that I can't do with my P1S with AMS.

@111anthon Ай бұрын

Just bought a troodon 2.0 pro so no need for this printer at the moment. When i need a idex printer in the future it would be a race between this or a voron phoenix Biggest difference the build volume 😅

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@111anthon l have a 500^3 V-Core 4 on order. Will be adding the IDEX upgrade when it becomes available. That will take up some room for sure 😅

@giovannitorresrojas6078 Ай бұрын

I'm looking at printers for nylon carbon fiber and this one is interesting because it would reduce the cost of the support material. Have you reviewed this material considering that it doesn't have a pre-heated chamber? Tnks.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

I did some testing with glass filled ABS which has similar properties. The passive chamber temperature rose to 55 degrees which should be suitable for CF Nylon, especially with a bed adhesive for added adhesion.

@vim55k Ай бұрын

Vcore 4 has many additional features...

@photelegy Ай бұрын

12:10 Does IDEX-slicing also work in OrcaSlicer? If yes, do you have a video how to set it up? Thank you very much!

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

Yes, you can slice with Orca as well. There are some profiles that have been developed by the community. I’ve not tried it personally.

@INNOCUBE3D 18 күн бұрын

@@ygk3d Orca does not support IDEX, it would be better to use prusa

@8bits955 26 күн бұрын

Dont really understand the idea to have the motor on the tool head, there seem almost zero benfit to it, added weight to the tool head, limited size and for assembly i am sure it easier to install it on a mounted frame than on the tool head with the belts

@andreask.2675 Ай бұрын

I really hope Formbot/Vivedino has improved the firmware fixes. I own a Formbot T-Rex 3.0 (also an IDEX at a price point 2000+ €) and it never received any firmware updates and is a constant pain. 🙁

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@andreask.2675 watch the firmware section of the video. The marathon is a different beast. A completely different team working on it. It’s Klipper now and not Marlin like the T-Rex.

@Kloberman Ай бұрын

As a Marathon owner I can tell you @ygk3d tells it how it is in practice. Using the latest image the Marathon is fully updateable, including the Marathon-specific code, through the standard Klipper Update Manager. Just click the check for updates button, click update all components, click the standard checkbox that you understand the risks, then click the update button - a few minutes later everything is updated including the latest Marathon-specific updates and macro adjustments. It just works.

@Makeringedients Ай бұрын

I am in the market to buy a few idex of this size minimum. The price is cheap for what it might do, but I dont see very tidy results from this video. Prints look pretty messy in general. Not convincing as I do not have time to finetune and fiddle with single printers.

@renesfoodpassion Ай бұрын

looks nice and quality parts are also nice to see

@st0mper121 Ай бұрын

Think i seen someone making a mod for the SV08 to add in tool changer. Maker Muse i think it was? to me the price of this is to high.

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

Teaching Tech is working on a SV08 tool changer. I think The Next Layer might be too.

@3dpathfinder Ай бұрын

1400 in U.S.

@mannytheengineer4513 Ай бұрын

Have you heard of the22 idex v3 from vision miner

@ygk3d Ай бұрын

@@mannytheengineer4513 yes. Looks nice but considerably more expensive. A good option if you want to print PEEK or other similar materials that need a heated chamber and 500C capable hotends.