The change Jesus brought to the Priesthood

[@leonaperdue8784]

Again, thank you so much for your diligence and your hard work in dealing with this heretical teaching. Much gratitude.

[@satpalhans2393]

Dear brother may God bless you and use you miraculously in these last days as your every video is a source of strength and blessings spiritually. Thanks to our resurrected Lord and Savior Jesus Christ .

[@YESHUAISTWL]

What have you ever learned from reading the last 23% of a book?

[@mathias.1994]

This is interesting! O what an exalted high priest we have in Jesus.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Amen, Mathias!

[@donthephoneman7084]

Mr solberg. Thank you again for your videos. You my friend are definitely gifted in explaining the scriptures. God bless you. HALLELUYAH

[@YESHUAISTWL]

Our SAVIOUR, THE MESSIAH, only Begotten Son of The Father came down here for us. He had His beard ripped out, beaten viciously, whipped, spit on and hung up by sharpened rods of iron. YESHUA had to go through that in order to reap the rewards Promised by The Almighty, worthy is The Lamb. None of it was given to YESHUA the one called Jesus. None if it! Yet, we can't follow All of His Commandments because they're too hard for us😢. homosexuality is declared a sin under those laws you declare defuct. So, its not a sin, right? The utter gall to claim you Love Him. Yet you can't be bothered to read the entire book if Live written for you. You can't go to church when HE says. Or call Him by His actual name and not a title so common t requires addendum to identify.

[@John3.36]

The law is essentially "eternal", but our relationship to it as Christians is not the same as those Jews living under the OT covenant.

[@leo11190]

Agreed. To the Jews who have not yet had the revelation of Jesus as their Messiah, the law continues to be a tutor.

[@YESHUAISTWL]

Do you enjoy football or American football? Basketball? Do you watch the entire game and really get into it? Excitement escalating as the game continues? Or do you watch the last 1/4 and claim to know how the game went? If your kot under the law and believe the True Sabbath doesn't apply to you, know that the laws against men being with men is also listed there.

[@YESHUAISTWL]

Jewish people whom refuse to co vert are doing so because YHWH Commanded them to stay away from prophets that engage in pagan worship, violate HIS Torah and defame His Sactified Sabbath. Thats why YAH will not deal to harshly with them because Christians engage in all of that and more blatant disrespect.

[@John3.36]

@@YESHUAISTWL Yes, I am not on the football team. I can safely watch it from afar. :)

[@hennievangalen3789]

Thank you for this very clear teaching 🙏

[@j.michael]

Amen and amen and amen brother RL!! 👍🏻

[@FormerTrucker]

You would think that the change in priesthood would be the best argument against Christians keeping the law of Moses. In fact the law of Moses is very clear about who can be a high priest or a priest period. So it would have to be a new covenant.

[@janaweaver227]

Yes. This is so good!

[@chrismckinny7518]

Dearest brethren,. Please recognize the fine, high level of exegetical teaching to which we are being exposed through R. L. Pastor Greg

[@mattaikay925]

Absolutely fascinating lecture - May Adonai richly bless you and yours

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Thank you, Malloof! Shalom, Rob

[@vantmar8738]

The New Testament features both a common priesthood of all believers as well as a ministerial priesthood who continually offers up the perfect sacrifice of Christ himself, who commanded the disciples to "do this in memory of me".

[@miken8820]

Yay! New videos!

[@jaredg5663]

Hey brother Rob. I'm wondering at what point Christ's priesthood started. I was thinking at his baptism, but if that were true, then he couldn't fulfill the law of Moses right? Seeing how a new priesthood brings in a new law, and two contracts can't be in effect at the same time. So logically, I'm thinking when he said it is finished is when all was accomplished and the new contract could be made. Any thoughts? Thanks

[@flyguymt]

Hello Rob, I am new to this channel and find that you are a very educated, a good communicator with a gentle spirit. As a believer for almost 4 decades and as a ferocious Bible reader, I have a lot of questions regarding these topics. I will start here; regarding the ending of the Levitical Priesthood with the New Covenant, Christian Theology states it has ended forever. So my question is this, as believers in the whole of scripture what do we do with the prophecies in books such as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Zechariah who foretell that the Levitical Priesthood will be back in the Millennial Reign of Christ? Do we treat all scripture on an equal footing? Are those OT prophetic books now diminished and put under the Apostolic writings like Hebrews and Revelation and much of Paul's writings? I am sure you have delt with this question before. What are your thoughts?

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Thanks, flyguymt! Glad to have you here. I'm looking forward to learning from your well-read contributions to the conversations. As to your question, end-times prophecies can be a tricky area, as I'm sure you know. All Scripture is, of course, God-breathed and inspired. And many of the OT prophecies are clarified (or at least further illuminated) by the NT authors. So I would not say that the OT eschatological prophecies are "diminished." But I think we need to be careful to interpret them in light of the NT revelations. Blessings, Rob

[@cbonhomme1]

Very well explained.

[@byonnoyb]

Have you viewed the Jewish Catholic and The Catholic Jew here on KZbin? Very, very highly recommended content. Thank you and may God bless you abundantly. Viva Cristo Rey!

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

I have not heard of that channel. I'll have to check it out. Thanks! Rob

[@byonnoyb]

@@TheBiblicalRoots you're most welcome Rob. It is likely that you will appreciate what they too have to offer. They've been on quite a journey... The Jewish Catholic www.youtube.com/@TheJewishCatholic JewishCatholic www.youtube.com/@JewishCatholic

[@PUSH2Tim]

You’re awesome, thanks so much for your diligence into the sound doctrine of Truth! ❤️❤️❤️

[@YESHUAISTWL]

May I ask why The ALMIGHTY would put His only Begotten Son through all of that horrific agony to earn the rewards YHWH had promised YESHUA, only to have all of us be couch potato Christians, changing their Sacred names, celebrating pagan ways, blaspheme His Holy Sabbath, ignore HIS PASSOVER HE specifically said we must honor for eternity? "My people will perish for lack of knowledge". How can you say you love Him and have a personal relationship when you refuse to read what He loved you enough to write down ? What if your child told you they didn't have to do would said, "because its too hard?" Or informed you that they wanted to stop saying Daddy and Momma and decided to call Dad "Mister" as in, "Mister, carry me. Or "Hey Lady" I'm hungry please! What do you believe it means in The Bible when The SAVIOUR of the world says, "Depart from me! I never knew you, you worker of lawlessness!!" What laws is YESHUA talking about? What foes pick up your cross mean? So many spoiled and entitled children.

[@kingPerry34]

Rob I agree with you that there is a change in the law of Moses,but is there any change in the law of God?

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

No. The Law of God is eternal and unchanging because it is grounded in God Himself. Shalom, Rob

[@kingPerry34]

@@TheBiblicalRoots I agree with this statement, but the sabbath is the law of God not the law of Moses, because it’s one of the Ten Commandments, ( the law of God ) so why you keep calling the Ten Commandments the law of Moses

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

@@kingPerry34 Because the 10 Commandments were the first commands given under the Sinai covenant. Those laws were then expanded in the Torah to include 613 laws (depending on how you count them). But it all starts with The Ten! Rob

[@kingPerry34]

@@TheBiblicalRoots Rob even if what you say about the Ten commandment was given first it still doesn’t make it Moses law or the Sinai covenant here is what it is Deuteronomy 4:1,2,13 if you have any other scripture that say the Ten Commandments is Moses law show it to me

[@adamguy33]

You search the law and in them you think you have eternal life. So do Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem today who strive to keep the 613 laws have eternal life? They Never miss a sabbath day so are they saved? I never keep a sabbath day and I am saved. Why is this? Because my faith has made me rightous so keeping some rituals on certain days of the week doesnt save or not save me. Staying away from certian foods doesn't save or not save me. Only faith in the messiah Jesus Christ saves me. The law does nothing but let me know I need a savior. But it truly has nothing to do with Saturday or Sunday only my moral depravity. And if anyone thinks they have to keep certain days special, or feasts or moons or animal sacrafices has missed the point and is probably not saved and doesnt know the Holy Spirit

[@Charles73358]

Thank you for such a great teaching there is so much deception going on within the Bible belt not understanding the change of the priesthood still teaching that Christians should pay Tithes instead of giving from the heart

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Thanks for watching, Dennis!

[@aaronlewis8948]

Tithing came before the Law of Moses, but yes, any giving should be done joyfully.

[@Charles73358]

@aaronlewis8948 You may be referring to when Abraham gave Melchisedec a tenth of the spoils from war and I will state this as my opinion and I will say that when Abraham did that it was symbolic of the mandate of the tithing of the Mosaic law because it was as if " Levi was paying tithes to Melchisedec so that Abraham could receive the blessing from Melchisedec and Melchisedec was just as the Son of man with no beginning or ending and without Mother or Father Hebrews 7:9-10 9 And as I may so say, Levi also, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham. 10 For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him. But at the same time, Abraham did not tithe any personal assets, and tithing didn't become Law until God commanded Moses to mandate it to the Israelites Amen 🙏!

[@iansmith9474]

In the Letter of 1 Peter, Peter was not addressing gentile believers, but the "Exiles" - Israelite believers who were scattered in the various locations mentioned: "To God’s elect, exiles scattered throughout the provinces of Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia..." It is to those specifically addressed in the letter (Israelites) that Peter attributes this statement to: "You are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God's special possession." - 1 Peter 2:9 These are epithets for Israel. Israel is a chosen people, a holy nation. Peter then finishes this affirmation with a reference to the Prophecy of Hosea: "Once you were not a people, but now you are the people of God; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy." - 1 Peter 2:10 This is reminiscent of the way Hosea is instructed to rebuke Israel: "...for I will no longer have compassion on the house of Israel, that I should ever forgive them...Then the LORD said, “Call him Lo-Ammi (which means “not my people”) for you are not my people, and I am not your God." - Hosea 1:7-8 Yet, in the midst of rebuke, God provides hope: "And it will happen that in the very place where it was said to them, ‘You are not My people,’ they will be called ‘sons of the living God.’ Then the people of Judah and of Israel will be gathered together, and they will appoint for themselves one leader, and will go up out of the land. For great will be the day of Jezreel." - Hosea 1:10-11 Peter was intimating that Jesus was/is/will be the "leader" who will restore and gather Israel. And that through their faith, they were undoing the curse of Hosea - in the Old Testament they were abandoned without mercy, yet in the New Covenant they receive mercy and are made "sons of the living God".

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Thanks, Ian! Great comments. I respectfully disagree that Peter’s letter only applies to Jewish believers in Jesus. (Israel is designated as God’s chosen people in the OT, but Peter identifies his _Christian_ readers (1 Pet 1:2) as God’s chosen people, showing the continuity of God’s work from OT into NT times.) But let’s suppose, for the sake of argument, you are correct. It would not change the point made in my video, which is that the Levitical priesthood is no more. Individual believers in Jesus are now a holy priesthood able to “offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ” (1 Pet 2:5). Blessings, Rob

[@iansmith9474]

@@TheBiblicalRoots However, why would he arbitrarily refer to gentile Christians as "exiles" scattered in the provinces mentioned. It makes more sense, keeping with the narrative of the restoration of the Northern Kingdom, that Peter is writing to the many descendants of the Northern tribes that were scattered and settled as exiles in those regions. Fortunately, James was less vague: "To the twelve tribes scattered among the nations: greetings."

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

@@iansmith9474 I am following your logic, Ian. However, there are a couple passages later in chapter 1 that suggest Peter is writing to Gentiles, at least in part. For example, he refers to his reader's "former ignorance" (v14) and "the futile ways inherited from your forefathers" (v18) which are both references to Gentiles, not Jews. Here are a few helpful resources: The NIV Biblical Theology Study Bible says, "Because the precise date of this letter is unknown and little is known about the Christians of northern Asia Minor until the early second century, the specific occasion of this letter is uncertain. If the address to the "exiles" scattered across northern Asia Minor reflects a historical situation-as opposed to expressing a metaphoric understanding of earthly life as an exile away from the believers heavenly home-then perhaps some recent migration of Christians to those provinces may have raised the need for apostolic instruction about life in their new social setting." The Faithlife Study Bible says, "In the Hebrew Bible the nation of Israel is designated as God's chosen or elect people (See Deut 4:37; Isa 45:4). In the NT, this term is expanded to include the Church, which consists of both Jews and Gentiles. Although Peter is the apostle to the Jews (Gal 2:7-8), the churches he writes to in Asia Minor probably had mostly Gentile (non-Jewish) members (See 1 Pet 1:14, 18, 2:9-10; 4:3-4)." The Bible Knowledge Commentary says, "Peter immediately, using a careful choice of words, began to comfort and encourage his readers. Christians are God's elect not by chance or human design but by God's sovereign, unconditional choice. Once only the nation of Israel could claim this title. The readers were scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, sprinkled like salt throughout five of Asia Minor's Roman province is. The letter was evidently meant to circulation among the churches in this area. "Scattered" (diasporas) had special meeting to the Jewish Christians in these churches. The diaspora referred to JEWS who were separated from their homeland. Peter adapted this word which previously described Israel to emphasize the condition of the early church." Best, Rob

[@iansmith9474]

@@TheBiblicalRoots Peter writes: "you are a Holy people [genos]" - genos as in genome/race. Are the gentiles/nations (plural) a Holy race (singular)? What race, other than Israel, can we regard as Holy? He was not writing to "Jews" (a designation for the southern kingdom) but to the descendants of the Northern kingdom. Their forefathers fell into idolatry, created a false religion, and as a result, God divorced them, and had them sent into perpetual exile. During the time of Jesus, they were still in exile. Evidently, many in the regions mentioned by Peter had not forgotten their ancestry. They inherited idolatry, and futile ways from their forefathers. I can see why a Christian would want to interpret the text as symbolic language, but the plain text shows no reason for it. Christians are taking a very nuanced and compelling situation and completely flattening it out. Imagine the descendants of the Northern tribes are residing in exile, they know they are condemned and without an inheritance. Their only hope is the redemption as spoken of by prophecy. Suddenly, they encounter Christians providing a way back to God. Then in a letter written by Peter, he makes it final by citing Hosea and regarding their faith as the fulfillment of prophecy, and the prerequisite for their return. This is exciting stuff.

[@carmensiekierke3579]

@@iansmith9474 Are you a premillennialist?

[@jaredg5663]

Wouldn't this rule out any possibility of a future sacrificial system like in many churches escatology?

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hi, Jared. I believe that is the case. It's why Hebrews 10:18 says, "There is no longer any offering for sin." Blessings, RLS

[@jaredg5663]

@@TheBiblicalRoots Thanks brother

[@jaredg5663]

@@TheBiblicalRoots I was just wondering, what is the future purpose of Israel?

[@richardbluett958]

So you believe Paul is more important than God because Paul knew the Law was weak, but God did not, I am pleased that you and every Christian has to explain that to God, I am really pleased that I don't believe Paul, but I believe God.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

How in the world did you come to that conclusion, Richard? Why would you presume that God did not know the Law was weak in the sense in which Paul meant that statement? I mean, Yahweh knew even at the giving of the Law at Mount Sinai that Israel would break it (Deut 31:16-18). Rob

[@richardbluett958]

@@TheBiblicalRoots He also knew Adam and Eve would eat from the tree, what I am saying is God said his Torah is forever, so it is not the right of Paul to change what God says is forever, and God does not lie forever means forever, even though He knew that people would break his law he gave us a chance to repent , even Jesus and John the Baptist told the Jews to repent, and Peter knowing the scriptures told Jesus he couldn't be killed, because Peter knew the scriptures and it never says messiah will die Matthew16:22. New King James Version Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying, “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!” New American Standard Bible And yet Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying, “God forbid it, Lord! This shall never happen to You!”

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Thanks, Richard. There was a great deal of confusion in the first-century about Jesus, especially before His resurrection. At the time, various Jewish sects held different opinions about the Messiah-how he would come and what he would do. But God's ways are higher than our ways, of course, and, as creatures, we can never fully know the mind of our Creator. As the Tanakh makes clear, Yahweh reveals things to His people on an as-needed basis in His own time. Many Jews in the first century, including Yeshua's own disciples, misunderstood Him. Which is why Jesus needed to "open their eyes" to show them how the Tanakh spoke of Him (Luke 24:44-48). But when the God of Israel resurrected Yeshua from the dead, it validated His claims to be Messiah, Savior, and Son of God. Shalom, Rob

[@richardbluett958]

@@TheBiblicalRoots One question has never been answered If Jesus was raised from the dead He would have presented himself at the Temple to show the Jews and the gentiles that were in Jerusalem the power of G-d by his resurrection and everyone would have known who Jesus was, but the thing the Christians miss is Paul and the apostles thought it was the end of days and Jesus was going to redeem Israel which he did not do please understand what is being said in Hebrews 1:, HEBREWS 1 Introduction: God Has Spoken Fully and Finally in His Son, God, having spoken from old time to the fathers through the prophets in many parts and in many ways, 2 has at the end of these days spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, 5 For to which of the angels did he say at any time, You are my Son; today I have become your Father And again, I will be to him a Father, and he will be to me a Son. from psalm 2:7 Hebrew scriptures, 7 I will tell of the decree; The Lord said to me, "You are My son; this day have I begotten you. I will tell of the decree: Said David, “This is an established decree, and [one] that I have received to tell this and to make known.” The Lord said to me: through Nathan, Gad, and Samuel. You are My son: The head over Israel, who are called “My firstborn son.” And they will endure through you, as is stated concerning Abner (II Sam. 3:18): “for God said, etc., ‘By the hand of My bondsman David shall I deliver… Israel.’” And for their sake, you are before Me as a son because they are all dependent upon you. this day have I: for I have enthroned you over them. begotten you: to be called My son and to be beloved to Me as a son for their sake, as it is stated (II Sam. 7:14) concerning Solomon: “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to Me a son.” We find further concerning David (Ps. 89:27) “He shall call Me, ‘You are my Father, my God, and the Rock of my salvation.’” Shalom Richard.

[@godsmorning825]

Amen.

[@phillipbradshaw]

The New Covenant [Yirmeyahu 31: 31] does open the door for all Believers to be Priests and kings, however, in the original Hebrew Gospel of Mattityahu, Yeshu'a HaMashiach, born of both the lineage of King David and Levi, through His virgin mother Miryam, said, " Do not say I have come to do away with the Torah or Prphets, I have not come to destroy, but to uphold. Heaven and Earth will pass away before before one jot or tittle will pass from the Torah." True there is no longer need for burnt offerings, or mediators for Beievers to approach the throne of Yehovah, however; there are still many elements of the Torah stands. Whosoever will bear the least of these Commandments, and teach others to do also, Yehovah Tzavuot will make void.

[@troynado40]

Somebody hasn't done all their homework. Yahusha Ha'Mashiach was also from the tribe of Levi. His legal stepfather Yoceph was decendent of the Prophet Nathan. His mother Mary was from the tribe of Judah, the line of Kings. So Yahusha indeed had the legal right under Mosaic law, to be both priest and King according to the Baruk of Ya'Acov.

[@adamhorstman3398]

Totally off topic but did you know that torah-observant Christians are currently divided on whether the Sabbath is actually on Saturday?! Many are lunar sabbatarians. These claim that the original God-given Sabbath as seen in Scripture is based on the cycle of the moon, not the "Roman" weekday and that Hillel the younger changed the Sabbath to a fixed weekly Saturday observance in the fourth century AD due to imperial pressure. Therefore the Sabbath day does not fall on the same day in our Gregorian calendar. Whether this is true or fallacious, (a simple Wikipedia search on Hillel 2 claims that the calendar was fixed), it does significantly contribute to overall consideration of HRE groups, the quest for epistemological certainty, the purpose of the Sabbath, God's Providence, man's confusion, etc.

[@adamhorstman3398]

And now I'm going to watch this video, lol

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

I did not know that. Very interesting! Thanks, Adam. The Torah commands Israel to rest "on the seventh day," not "on Saturday," or even "the last day of the week." It would be kind of funny if it turned out that the ancient cycle of the moon placed the "seventh day" on the day we currently refer to as Sunday.

[@leo11190]

Agreed… and very little focus on Jesus ( I’m referring to your last paragraph).

[@richardbluett958]

Where in the Hebrew scriptures does God say Malchizedek had no mother or father, and no beginning or no end, nowhere that I can find, And Malchizedek: The Midrash Aggadah (Targum Jonathan, Ned. 32b, Mid. Ps. 76:3) states that he was Shem, the son of Noah.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hi Richard. The MIdrash, while important and informative, are no authority. They are rabbinic musings, sot to speak, not Scripture. And especially the Midrash Aggadah, which are more theologically creative and story-based Midrash. As far as Hebrews, I like how Wiersbe describes it: "Melchizedek was a man (see Heb. 7:4), so he had to have had a mother and a father. But there is no record of his genealogy (“descent”) in the Old Testament; and this is significant because most great persons in the Old Testament have their ancestry identified. It was especially important that the priests be able to prove their ancestry (see Ezra 2:61-63; Neh. 7:63-65). So in Hebrews 7:3, the author uses an argument from silence, but it is a valid one." Blessings, Rob

[@richardbluett958]

@@TheBiblicalRoots Paul is no different from the Rabbis then because he is saying MELCHIZEDEK is Jesus and that is what I believed when I was a Christian , and so do millions of other Christians, try comparing Paul's writings against the the scriptures he is quoting as I and other ex Christians have, and you will see how he twists scripture, and he doesn't teach what Jesus and the apostles taught he teaches his Gospel his words not mine. May God Bless you also, and guide you.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hi, Richard. I'm not aware of anywhere in Scripture that Paul discusses Melchizedek. Or maybe it's your belief that Paul wrote the book of Hebrews? I don't agree with that authorship, necessarily, but even where Melchizedek is mentioned in Hebrews, it does not teach that "MELCHIZEDEK is Jesus." It says that Jesus is a high priest "after the order of" Melchizedek. I suppose some might see Melchizedek in Genesis 14 as a Christophany, which isn't an unreasonable theory, in my opinion. But it is just a theory; Scripture does not affirm it. More importantly, Paul does not "twist the Scriptures." The most common reason for people to come to that conclusion is because they are reading Paul's writings through a wooden, modern, literal lens, rather than through the Hebraic, midrashic approach of the NT writers. Paul uses the same literary and theological license that the rabbis and Jewish sages of his time used on the Tanakh. Blessings, Rob

[@richardbluett958]

@@TheBiblicalRoots Rob my friend and fellow seeker of the truth, Jews Christian's and Muslims believe the Hebrew scriptures are from G-d but they are taken out of context and sometimes there are said about messiah that are not in the scriptures, example , 5 Therefore, when He came into the world, He said: “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, But a body You have prepared for Me. 6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You had no pleasure. 7 Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come- In the volume of the book it is written of Me- To do Your will, O God.’ ” 7 ou desired neither sacrifice nor meal offering; You dug ears for me; a burnt offering or a sin offering You did not request. 8 Then I said, "Behold I have come," with a scroll of a book written for me. 13 For countless evils have encompassed me; my iniquities have overtaken me and I could not see [them because] they are more numerous than the hairs of my head, and my heart has forsaken me. 14 O Lord, be willing to save me; O Lord, hasten to my help. 15 May those who seek my soul to destroy it be shamed and embarrassed together; may those who seek to harm me retreat and be humiliated. 16 May they be bewildered afterwards because of their shame, those who say about me, "Aha! Aha!" 17 All who seek You shall exult and rejoice; those who love Your salvation shall constantly say, "May the Lord be magnified." 18 But I am poor and needy; may the Lord think of me. You are my help and my rescuer, my God; do not delay. 7 No body prepared for him 8 A scroll of a book written for me, 13 His iniquities (sins) have overtaken him, 18 when was Jesus poor and needy, all of these verses are from psalm 40, this is Hebrews 10:5-6. 5 Therefore, when he comes into the world, he says, You did not want sacrifice and offering, but a body you prepared for me. 6I n whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin you had no pleasure. Hebrews 10:7-8. Then I said, in the scroll of the book it is written about me, “Look! I have come to do your will, O God. 8 After saying above, Sacrifices and offerings and whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin you did not want, nor did you have pleasure in them (which are continually offered according to the law), The sin offerings were for unintentional sins, Real sins you have to repent and not do the again, then G-d will forgive those sins and G-d never says somebody else can die for your sins Jeremiah 31:29. 29 But each man shall die for his iniquity; whoever eats the unripe grapes- his teeth shall be set on edge. I am sorry Rob but nothing in in the new testament speaks about Jesus being messiah or the son of G-d, I hope you and I keep up our discussion about this as we are both searching for the truth. sorry this was so long but I wanted you to understand where I get my statements from. Shalom Richard

[@richardbluett958]

The new covenant does not come until the twelve tribes are back in the land of their fathers, and God is dwelling in the midst of his chosen people Israel. 26 Behold days are coming, says the Lord, and I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with seed of man and seed of beasts. 27 And it shall be, as I have watched over them to uproot and to break down, to demolish and to destroy and to afflict, so will I watch over them to build and to plant, says the Lord. 28 In those days, they shall no longer say, "Fathers have eaten unripe grapes, and the teeth of the children shall be set on edge." 29 But each man shall die for his iniquity; whoever eats the unripe grapes- his teeth shall be set on edge. 30 Behold, days are coming, says the Lord, and I will form a covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, a new covenant. (29) every man will die for his own sin, so Jesus died for nothing, that is if you believe the words of God .

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

This happened in Acts 2. How cool! ~Rob

[@bugsocsollie1694]

​@RLSolberg Actually it began in Acts 2, but never, to this day, completed. Instead of the 70th week, came a Dispensation of Grace for the Gentiles because Israel fell in unbelief. They rejected their Messiah and their kingdom. So, salvation came to the Gentiles in a way that was never prophesied in OT Scripture. The New Covenant is for Israel and it doesn't come to them until after those days. After what days? After the days that God "regarded them not." We are still in those days. Israel is still stuck between Hosea 1:9 and Hosea 1:14-15. But soon, God will once again call out to Israel and those that answer His call and endure Tribulation till the end will be His people who were not His people. Hosea 2:23 That's for Israel not the Body of Christ Church. They will be kings and Priests on earth in that Kingdom forever. The Body of Christ Church is eternally in the Heavens. 2 Corinthians 5:1. ...not on earth.

[@troynado40]

Hebrews 7:18 doesn't disannull the law. It diannulls the command of the priestly regimen. Beware the teachers of lawlessness. Obedience to the commandments of Yah is our part of the marriage covenant. Do not be deceived. Christians that disregard the commanded feasts and keeptheir own Pagan holidays and Shabbats are not the bride of our Mashiach.

[@Jdavid7771]

Hi, It is true that Hebrews says that Jesus is our high priest, but is he the high priest on the earthly tabernacle or the heavenly tabernacle? Hebrews 8:4 even states that if Jesus was on earth, he could not be high priest. But because of his high position, he's able to gain access to the heavenly tabernacle, which is how is able to be high priest while being from the tribe of Judah. But that doesn't negate the Aaronic or Levitical Priesthood. Zachariah 14, which is a prophetic chapter of how the Messiah will defeat the enemies of Israel, also states that the temple will be rebuilt. And in that temple, the sons of Zadok, who are the descendants of Aaron, will serve on that temple. And according to the logic from Hebrews 8:4, Jesus cannot serve in that third temple on the earth. The pact that God made with the priests was tied to the earthly temple. Have you considered to look at the Aaronic and Levitical Priesthood as a Royal Grant?Moshe Weinfeld has great scholarly articles on royal grants that help expound on the OT. He is a Jewish scholar, but there are other christian scholars that discuss royal grants in the Bible as well. Peace and Blessings.

[@mattaikay925]

Yeshua is King and Judge - not doing the duties of a priest.

[@simonskinner1450]

The law of Christ is the law of Abraham, the Hebrews roots are with Abraham not Moses. Grace (blessing) is available for Israelites since Abraham.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hi, Simon! Do Hebrew Roots folks keep the law of Abraham or the law of Moses? RLS

[@Pverb623]

Read professor Jeremiah 31:33 The new covenant is for Israel……. Why do you not use the Jewish scripture, again you are very good at sophisms.

[@Pverb623]

You only use it, when it suits you, yet you use it incorrectly.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Thanks, Thorne. Where did I use the Tanakh incorrectly in this video? ~Rob

[@Pverb623]

@@TheBiblicalRoots The moment it starts of Jesit’s resurrection shifted the priesthood. Because if this perception, Christianity of any flavor, purports …..it means this, which automatically changes the Torahs words and meanings. Take out a resurrection of Jesit, and then read those scriptures again, it will not give the same read and understanding.

[@Pverb623]

@@TheBiblicalRoots It’s interesting how you use sophisms to say how Jews must agree with your analysis of the laws of Moses. Then say well, the NT say this and gives you solace, because it agrees with what you would like it to say…….because if not…..but we can’t be wrong. (Arrogance) Why is Christians lack of studying the laws, give them the ideas that they know more about them, then the ones who live them? I know people like this, they try to tell a observant Jew, how Jews are and live, what they believe in and why, yet they cannot even get the first two commandment correct. The saddest thing is they don’t even read every day, yet they know more than one that does….? Let me go to a Russian to learn Chinese, what a waste of time. Why would I go to a Christian of any kind to learn the Jewish scriptures? acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:a5f8dec8-56e5-3c5d-8fe6-6ba10c3e9037

[@Pverb623]

@@TheBiblicalRoots Torahism…….what a word -ism Description -ism is a suffix in many English words, originally derived from the Ancient Greek suffix -ισμός, and reaching English through the Latin -ismus, and the French -isme. So not a Hebrew words at all. Ism: a distinctive practice, system, or philosophy, typically a political ideology or an artistic movement. a set of beliefs, especially ones that you disapprove of: Thatcher is unique among her predecessors in having given the English language a brand new ism, ... a doctrine, theory, system, etc., esp. one whose name ends in -ism 1. the act, practice, or result of terrorism 2. the condition of being pauperism 3. action, conduct, or qualities characteristic of patriotism 4. the doctrine, school, theory, or principle of cubism, socialism 5. devotion to nationalism 6. an instance, example, or peculiarity of Gallicism, witticism 7. an abnormal condition caused by alcoholism. The name of this book, show you don’t believe the Torah to be truth, all truth about all matters of life, including the Mashiach. We believe he will come, yet has not come yet, but this is not our focus, only Torah and fear of HaShem is. Why do we need to search for something we cannot see, what HaShem gave us something we can see, to find Him with? Everything else is a distraction, the work of HaSatan. HaShem teaches us that it is only Him and no other besides Him, before Him, after Him. His Name is jealous and Jesit or Yeshua is not one of His names, besides a direct translation from Hebrew to English…Joshua fits the bill.

[@78mking]

We are not yet in the New Covenant my friend

[@thechartmentor]

Why would you create a whole KZbin channel to target one christian group (denomination) This is the reason why the world laugh at the church, wanting to make a name for themselves is more important than building the Kingdom of God. True Christians spend No time attacking each other and creating division and invest their time preaching Jesus while making disciples. Preach Jesus and let others live their lives and convictions as they find peach with God.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hey, Tick! Thank for weighing in. I hear what you're saying. But I'm actually not targeting one "denomination" of Christianity. The goal of this channel is to address _false_ teachings, which is a very biblical thing to do. " I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths." (2 Tim 4:1-4) "Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood. I know that after my departure fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves will arise men speaking twisted things, to draw away the disciples after them." (Acts 20:28-30) "For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds. We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God and take every thought captive to obey Christ." -2 Cor 10:5

[@John3.36]

#1) They are not Christians, they are Judiazers. #2) Even if they were brothers, we are to call out "Erring brothers". #3) Why are you attacking Solberg, aren't you doing the same thing you are accusing him of?

[@amberfrost792]

Amen