The Character Encyclopedia and Mike Afton... FNAF theory

This video is my thoughts on Mike Afton and the Character Encyclopedia.
This episode is a rewrite of an old episode I did but with a new twist on the subject. The character encyclopaedia was new to this video.
Subscribe for future content.

[@AngelTheory-M]

Puppet " its give you a false sense of security" Vanessa "Its definitely give you a false sense of security"

[@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness]

Any character who's motives are mysterious can be good or bad. I see both characters as giving creepy vibes at first then become good by the end. PS. I remember your username from a previous video. Where did the reference to Circus Baby being behind the concrete wall come from? I agree that Henry ran the rentals, Elizabeth pretended to be Baby in an underground bunker. I wanted to use that reference in the future.

[@AngelTheory-M]

@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness Hello :) in the story the mimic its talk about the creation of edwin was infused with rage was sealed behind concrete in trilogy of fnaf, fourth closet, when john and charlie are reading the letter of henry to aunt jane, how henry regrets his creation that he infused with rage and (seal away) now we are getting in dlc ruin the mimic endo was sealed behind concrete in security breach, in staff meeting room has a wall filled with concrete we are less than 30 days for fnaf 10th year anniversary i am sure the next game dlc of security breach, we will play as Susie trying make sense of her dreams she having lately its because fnaf at this point is like a game of chess being played by gregory and vanessa versus william afton, one is always trying to outsmart the other UCN show the vengeful spirit tries so many times to outsmart william, but every single only got humilate by him william afton plan to win against gregory and vanessa is frist to forced all the others ghost kids to remember their memories, and all them rebelled against the vengeful spirit william afton believe with this he will get all control back, and susie its his frist victim and now he is free he going after her again Nightmare Freadbear, voiceline show, that william really believe he is one of them and announcement of the new books, and now scott is revisiting steam page of fnaf world, maybe for new update, for new a game there even a book that will be free everything in preparation for second movie of fnaf, because will contain elements beyond the missing child accident, that was frist movie

[@nathanielgarza9198]

@@AngelTheory-M It’s as if our Security were Breached

[@alysonberryhill4773]

1:15 I really like this rendition of the minigame. The mustard man always confused me but it honestly makes sense to Henry's character if you've read the silver eye's trilogy. He's no saint exactly so it's possible and is a good explanation to me.

[@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness]

And for a better explanation I first mentioned that in my "Understanding FNAF 4" video.

[@Herr_Schindler]

Yes, he's no saint. But he's not an abusive drunk and never was depicted as such

[@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness]

I don't think of Henry as every being an abusive drunk. I think Jr's was a bar, green guy a bouncer. I suspect Henry turned to alcohol to suppress his feelings of guilt. Going home, banging on the door of a child who's actions reflect on Henry being the monster. But no abuse. Henry does have a reference in the Fourth Closet as pouring his rage into the adult Charlie animatronic; so he does express intense emotion.

[@Herr_Schindler]

@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness of course he does. He's human. Still, we never saw Henry being actually angry or intense with someone, especially recently traumatized child (as your theory states)

[@Herr_Schindler]

@@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness and I don't know about the whole alcohol thing. What kind of guilt he was trying to suppress? I saw some of your videos and I know that you have some interesting and unique takes so maybe the answer lies there. But as far as I know, at this point in the timeline nothing happened to him that would make him feel guilty. The bite is objectively Michael's fault, and Henry even in the novels was always strict about his children messing with machinery (that being springlocks), so I think he would not feel responsible for something like that. Also his wife and son should still be with him at this point, and Charlotte is alive (at least before Midnight Motorist)

[@xhacknight]

I know people think it's sucks but it's undeniably canon as scott wrote it HE MADE THE LORE

[@cenobittten]

This is a very different take from any I've seen before. I credit you for finding a totally different narrative. It's too fresh for me to understand the implications to the overall (i.e can't even begin to feedback/crit) but nevertheless i am impressed.

[@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness]

Ever since I came to the conclusion that William wasn't alone in his malicious acts the timeline has differed greatly for me compared to the community.

[@echothesilent4693]

So Mike was in on Henry's plan but couldn't tell Henry he was the guard? You're basically saying that if Henry didn't realize on his own he would've left an exit which could've caused the plan to fail so you basically theorized that Mike is an idiot.

[@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness]

I'm not sure what you're asking. At Circus Baby's rental Henry was supervisor and Mike worked there for a week. Henry would know Mike but Mike still 'stole' the Funtimes; later coming back to explain how it all failed. Henry and Mike worked together on a plan and I suspect Henry was ready to be the role of the guard, to which Mike took his place. Henry prepared tape recordings as Mike couldn't speak. The exit strategy was planned for both although I suspect neither wanted to follow through. Mike would know of the exit although had likely accepted his own fate. We learn that unresolved issues keep us in the world; although to end a series - everyone accepts their end.

[@adriangutierrez441]

Micheal being the security guard in UCN is weird. He does not deserve it. The candy cadet story explanation is pretty cool though.

[@nathanielgarza9198]

The reason Michael is not included is because it might confirm Mikebot

[@chararaltacc]

This. Also the fact that even THE MOVIES are merging Mike's character with Charliebot from the books is also pointing towards this. Of course, it could be just: A) a coincidence or B) mocking of the Mikebot theory from Scott, the way he mocks the dreamtheory but honestly, its just too suspicious thatt everything is starting to point at it more and more.

[@nathanielgarza9198]

@@chararaltacc yea I realized Mikebot was cannon the moment I saw Curse of Dreadbear no way that was a coincidence

[@3DFella]

@@nathanielgarza9198Haven’t heard anyone discuss Mikebot in atleast a good year, most people have just accepted that Foxybro is Michael and completely disregarded the theory that BV was rebuilt as a robot and is named Mike. Honestly I think Foxybro is a better canidate for being Mike since it adds a motive for his actions in the story, wanting to make up for killing his brother, but Scott has never been a good storyteller so I wouldn’t be surprised if mike is BV.

[@nathanielgarza9198]

@@3DFella the CC has a motive too. one actually explained in game He sees the animatronics as his friends because Fredbear manipulated him into seeing the robot animals as the only people that love and care about him Also if Michael was FoxyBro and you are implying his motive is guilt the Logbook has him make fun of the Bite of 1983(something a guilty person would not do)

[@zeldristhecactus1304]

I also believe in the JakeAfton theory, even since I ever readed the book.

[@FazbearsMenagerieOfMadness]

But did you read the epilogues as well?