CHECK OUT OUR MAP STORE HERE: www.redbubble.com/people/MapStory/shop
@samiibrahim53564 күн бұрын
What sense does it make to start with Oct 7th when the problem started back when Benjamin Disraeli, then the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, facilitated the British government's purchase of a 44% stake in the Suez Canal Company from the Egyptian Khedive Isma'il Pasha in 1875. To finance this acquisition, Disraeli arranged a loan of £4 million (approximately £500 million today when adjusted for inflation) from Lionel de Rothschild, a prominent member of the Rothschild banking family. The British bombarded Alexandria and subsequently occupied Egypt, including the Suez Canal area, in 1882 during the Anglo-Egyptian War. This strained the relationship between the British Empire and the Ottoman Empire, contributing to the Ottoman Empire siding with Germany during WWI because it perceived the occupation of Egypt as an occupation of the Ottoman territory. To add to the problem the British occupied the newly discovered Iranian oil fields which was another developing issue between the Ottomans and the British who wanted oil for their new war ships. To overthrow the Ottoman Empire the British turned to the Arab people, The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence occurred between July 14, 1915, and March 30, 1916. It was a series of letters exchanged between Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, and Sharif Hussein bin Ali, the Emir of Mecca. The correspondence was initiated during World War I as part of British efforts to secure Arab support against the Ottoman Empire, which had aligned itself with Germany and Austria-Hungary. It promised among other things a free and independent country for Palestinians. The correspondence was later a source of significant controversy because it appeared to conflict with the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916), a secret agreement between Britain and France to divide Ottoman territories in the Middle East into spheres of influence, and the Balfour Declaration (1917), which expressed British support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine. So, the stage was set for the ongoing Palestine Israel conflict by a British Empire that had come under the control of people like Bejamin Disraeli and "Lord Rothchild" the Balfour Declaration was issued on November 2, 1917, and General Edmund Allenby entered Jerusalem on December 11, 1917, just over five weeks later. With Palestine now occupied by the British, and the formal establishment of the British Mandate for Palestine in 1920, under the auspices of the League of Nations, was pivotal. The mandate incorporated the Balfour Declaration, committing Britain to support the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. This legal framework significantly facilitated Jewish immigration; the Zionists started the invasion of the now British occupied Palestine. The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine of 1947. The plan proposed by the UN General Assembly in Resolution 181 called for the partition of the British Mandate of Palestine into two separate states: one Jewish and one Palestinian, with Jerusalem under international administration. This two peaceful nations side by side never occurred because you cannot just invade someone's homeland and demand half of it for yourself and expect the people to just bow down to your desire for an ethno-state, instead the Nakba took place 700,000+ Palestinians were displaced, and 500+ Palestinian towns and villages were wiped off the map by Zionists, the number of dead was hidden and denied but was in the millions followed by 75+ years of occupation where Palestinians are denied their basic human rights by their brutal, sadistic occupiers, every Palestinian remaining in Palestine is treated as a prisoner of war including infants. When the Palestinians resist, they are labeled as terrorists and the focus of the Hasbara (הסברה) propaganda program is to always keep the focus on terrorism to keep the Americans from focusing on the real problem which is occupation and violations of human rights.
@zeynebzinep39527 ай бұрын
If you're wondering why the Ottomans used to wear such large turbans, these were their kefens, the cloth that was wrapped around the deceased before they were buried. Remember death often said our Prophet a.s.
@PoisonelleMisty43116 ай бұрын
"Oh, so you're saying they were just ahead of their time in fashion and funeral planning? Talk about being prepared for the afterlife in style!"
@aarontheamazing19855 ай бұрын
@@PoisonelleMisty4311 ur channel Is goated
@DarkVeilNebula3 ай бұрын
cucuk diken peygamber mi demis
@samstrange15432 ай бұрын
Remember life often - me
@eepycarwithbigballsАй бұрын
@@DarkVeilNebula Allah seni iftiralarında boğsun
@tetefather7 ай бұрын
it's funny how western depictions of the Ottoman empire always displays a minimalist approach to the borders, never coloring more than the essential cities they controlled when in actuality all of Arabia and most of north Africa was under complete control of the empire. You don't see modern Arabian/Egyptian maps only coloring the areas where most of the population resides in...
@jamieoliver42672 ай бұрын
western sources will always try to downplay the Ottomans because they hated them lol
@AtomicSubАй бұрын
@@jamieoliver4267I like the Ottomans, they usually preserved all the good historical stuff while the Crusaders, Genoa, Venice, etc didn’t
@theaterinafire25 күн бұрын
The facts of the Ottoman Empire counter modern western propaganda about Israel and "Muslim terrorism" in general.
@timon200619959 күн бұрын
Which historic western country have exaggerate borders on textbook. From what I haven seen most are not exaggerated until WW1 and things got chaotic.
@ArizonaSquatch10 ай бұрын
They made the best foot rests in history. Soft, elevating and practical.
@medivoyage2 ай бұрын
Great work! The history of the Ottoman Empire is a fascinating tapestry of ambition, cultural fusion, and eventual decline, illustrates the complexities of governance, military strategy, and cultural assimilation. The empire's legacy is particularly poignant in how it shaped modern Turkey.
@teachermaria123 Жыл бұрын
thank you for the clear explanation
@bgqueens6635 Жыл бұрын
Beautiful visuals, and very well explained. I’m gonna binge watch all your videos now.
@whicker59 Жыл бұрын
Nicely written and presented. Great job THIS IS HISTORY.
@raymondhartmeijer93008 ай бұрын
thanks for all your 'empire'-videos! this channel is quickly becoming a favourite
@dr.carlpatrasso38479 ай бұрын
Very well explained . Good job.
@chaganlalmeghwal25903 ай бұрын
It’s amazing to see how this empire shaped the course of history for centuries, spanning continents with its incredible architecture, powerful sultans, and complex society. A great watch for anyone interested in learning about one of history's greatest empires!
@tnayenga779 ай бұрын
Wonderful Documentation
@shamriznisthar270 Жыл бұрын
Great presentation. 600 years of complex history explained in 20 min. 👍🏼👍🏼
@stephenhoward466511 ай бұрын
Yeah left out a genocide or two or ten.
@diren629811 ай бұрын
@@stephenhoward4665sure buddy
@rockyetchison338011 ай бұрын
@@stephenhoward4665Not occupying and staging genocide in 21st Century zionist
@yusufpolatkesen84689 ай бұрын
We’re not westerners to commit genocide. That’s something you’re people are professionals at.
@3018Papa7 ай бұрын
@@stephenhoward4665 wich one?
@ryleyichardson75699 ай бұрын
wow so well put together. Travelling through Turkey rn and this was just what I needed!
@ianlindsey16679 ай бұрын
Turkey is such a great place to visit. I’ve never seen a more hospitable culture
@tafabeatz2 ай бұрын
@@ianlindsey1667they are mongols 😂
@coweatsman Жыл бұрын
The decline of the Ottoman Empire is very important for setting the geopolitical stage in the levant in the 20th century. The British Mandate of Palestine after WWI preceded the nation of Israel in 1948 and the troubles now in Gaza since stem from the promises of Lawrence of Arabia to Palestinians quickly broken by Lord Balfour.
@Robespierre-lI9 ай бұрын
Indeed. Very accurate statement. This once was a part of history that got skipped over in secondary school history education (at least in my country.). That was a big mistake.
@IanBaluwa6 ай бұрын
So bad we don't learn any of this in high school here in my boring country! The syllabus sucks like hell, is inaccurate and hardly highlights significant global events and issues. That's why as a fifteen year old interested in history, I'm thinking of leaving this impoverished nation (Malawi) and emigrating to the United States for tertiary education and to fulfill my career. Nice comment though, and why's your user name "cow eats man?" Good one.
@xailontalaski23854 ай бұрын
@@Robespierre-lI we didn’t even talked about the ottomans and the events surrounding their fall in my HS WWI class(section) kinda sucks makes for a huge gap w little answers
@19ate42 ай бұрын
I kind of blame the atheist Zionist for believing that God gave them that land, but you can blame the British also
@StupidCat4Ай бұрын
The British never said Palestine was meant to be entirely an Arab state or entirely a Jewish state but they supported both
@Kaif08610 Жыл бұрын
This vid deserves a lot more views!
@TheTruthKiwi Жыл бұрын
Kids should have to watch one vid like this for every 2 or 3 asinine Tiktok or fake prank videos they watch.
@StevensQueue9 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video
@michaeladdae2014 Жыл бұрын
Here because of the isreal and Palestine war
@reefmohammed3553 Жыл бұрын
Not cause by ottoman empire but cause by british and UN
@Iskah_Batya Жыл бұрын
@@reefmohammed3553thank you yes. They created it. Jewish people wanted to stay in their homes and some didn't want to force gods hand. Israel should be a place. Palestine too. Israel was just created and then the british left them. They were both angry about the way it happened. Churchill was antisemitic.
@renegadeknows1776 Жыл бұрын
Me to because everyone yells colonization but they don't understand that all nations take land and colonize it it just depends on whether they can hold it
@user-qb2lv8uo4x Жыл бұрын
@@renegadeknows1776No... the West have taken more land and are the biggest colonisers...please check your history.
@oaklandscrx Жыл бұрын
Me as well
@Tareke352 Жыл бұрын
Awesome information 😮
@TheTruthKiwi Жыл бұрын
Man, kids today have it lucky when it comes to history. Sure we had history books and teachers but they would break it down into every complex occurrence that happened and make it hard to see the big picture. Here we have it all summed up perfectly in 20 mins! Yes, there's a lot of crap on KZbin and the internet as a whole but thankfully there's some really good stuff, like this, as well. Thanks TIH 🙂
@BobbyBundlez10 ай бұрын
it's so fucking true man. I have learned so much in just a few weeks from random youtube watching
@CharlesD-qb9nm10 ай бұрын
It's absolutely incredible; I like to use videos to get that big picture then read books to get more information, its best to have a mix of both because books are more accurate. You always have to watch for false information when studying history on the internet.
@prodamitsu10 ай бұрын
@@BobbyBundlez so much information easily accessible. It's crazy that not many people use such opportunities to learn
@americanatheart1107 ай бұрын
Yet, we dont learn the lesson. How the empires fall and glory fades. The riots in the USA , political turmoil, etc. eventually, our great country will be divided into smaller provinces and won't b grandeur. The US might be the shortest lived superpower.
@PoisonelleMisty43116 ай бұрын
Well, I guess you could say we're living in the History for Dummies era. Who needs textbooks when you can get the TL;DR version in just 20 minutes? Thanks, technology!
@vascobranco5296 Жыл бұрын
I can't believe you didn't mention the portuguese-ottoman wars
@Critt_Ari11 ай бұрын
You can't narrate history of a 600 year old empire without cutting many important parts alongside with some less important parts.
@diren629811 ай бұрын
Sadly yeah the portuguesse ottorman war was more important then the siege of viena
@Robespierre-lI9 ай бұрын
Don't expect so much from brief summaries.
@smart67877 ай бұрын
There were 13 Ottoman-Russian wars. It's impossible to explain it all in 20 minutes. For example, Napoleon's Egyptian expedition. It is impossible to explain in a few minutes.
@TimurKhan-dn5vx6 ай бұрын
@@diren6298 battle of buda beat habsburg ottomans beat portugese both
@HistoryOfRevolutions Жыл бұрын
"I was seeking a cure for my trouble; My trouble became my cure" - Ahmed Nedim (Ottoman Poet)
@corvavw64479 ай бұрын
Nisi stulti resspondere ad omnem quaestionem 😂😊
@lazmett2974 Жыл бұрын
After the places where the Ottomans had to leave, they fought each other in war after war, the Ottoman Empire was the security of those lands.
@alpturkel77622 ай бұрын
And now in turkey some peoples says that we have to help them you know syris, pilistiane(idk how to write in eglish but we say in turkey filistin) and the other arabian country . They thought we help them, give them some money and soldiers . But why. They betrayed us during ww1 and after . You know for us 19. And 20. Century they were so Hard times . Russian, ottoman war , balkan wars and some rebellion and finally ww1 and they betrayed us during ww1 . And we have this sentences to tell their therechery " arabian country have much more traitor than their sand " in turkish (arabın kumundan çoktur haini) . So i am very sorry about syria and filistin but this was their choice . And we lostes almost everything after ww1 . Even they wpuld have taken(english, greek , french)big part of our country (istanbul and medittraion side of turkey and southeastern turkey )but ataturk and his friends saved us . But should never forget and we concentrate ourselves. We should teach us , make more science and have more power . But should.not help them . Let them do it , this is not our issue , this is their issue. And i will finiş my words with ataturk's maxim ' war is murder unless for self defence' we are gratefull to ataturk and his friends and our bravo soldier who gave their life for next generation without hesitate . And the most important things about ataturk is not his war capanilty and being big commandary. He was very succesfull politician , scientist if hed had not exist maybe we would save us somehow but we would Be like egpty or syria. If now we have civilization (comprate to the other middleeast country) i
@orkunugurlu996727 күн бұрын
It's the same in every country
@colindaniels945 Жыл бұрын
You're forgetting why the Selijuk Empire ultimately collapsed: The invasion of the Mongols. With the defeat of the Selijuks by the Mongols,the Selijuk state in Anatolia broke down into several smaller states/principalities,one of them eventually becoming the Ottoman Empire. Had the Byzantine Empire been stronger and more competent, they could've taken advantage of the Selijuk disarray in Anatolia and regained control
@zy966211 ай бұрын
I still don't understand why only the Selijuk in Anatolia spoke Turkic, the narration of this video even says that after taking over Persia, the Selijuk adopted their language ...
@Runo192311 ай бұрын
@@zy9662 No, Turks never abandon their language wherever they go. You can see it in Mamluk, Mughal etc. dynasties too. Their subject can speak their native language, but the Khans or later Sultans speak Turkish along with the language of that land.
@zy966211 ай бұрын
@@Runo1923 so why they don't speak Turkish in Syria, northern Iran and Iraq?, if those regions were similarly conquered by the Turks even before Anatolia. If you check the DNA of modern Greeks and Turks is very similar, as if the Turkish are ethnic Anatolians that happened to change their language from Greek to Turkish
@Runo192311 ай бұрын
@@zy9662 First of all, Greeks was not that common in Anatolia. There were already many different ancient people. Greeks came from modern-day Greece and colonized mostly the coastline cities. Second, the similarity btw DNAs is the result of population exchange after the WW1 from both sides. Greeks in Anatolia and Turks in Greece exchanged. After living centuries together, of course a genetic bond occurred. Finally, Turkic people in Syria and Iraq are called Turkmen and they can still use many old Turkish words. But unfortunately the nation state age began and familiarized every ethnic group outside their majority population to adopt the new rules. The things I said above were about before these changes in world politics.
@zy966211 ай бұрын
@@Runo1923 OK even if Greek was not common in anatolia, there were other languages before the turks arrived. So why of all places where turks (and later the Ottomans) conquered in the middle east only in Anatolia they speak Turkish...
@sbyurt13 ай бұрын
One thing not mentioned here is that the Ottomans did not “colonize”, enslave, or even fight the civilian populace of the countries they invaded. There was a “jizya” tax of 2%, which was a fee for protection as non-Muslims were not required to serve in the military (unless converted as children to become Janissaries). Through the Millet system, Christians were judged by Christian law/court systems, and Jews were judged by their own law and court systems.
@rubywolf52962 ай бұрын
The Ottoman empire ran extensive slave markets & sponsored many slave raids across the Mediterranean & African continent. The empire also colonise its subjects within its sphere of influence, the reason they never colonised elsewhere was simply due to them being out competed by rival European empires. However you are correct about the taxes. Non-Muslims ended up becoming a sustainable part of the empire's income which was used to maintain both the state & military expenditures. When the European sections of the empire broke off, it created a large financial blackhole which necessitated the need for political & economic modernization.
@19ate42 ай бұрын
Even the ottomans knew the European man was a better fighter then the rest of their diverse populations. Elite janissaries.
@SUPERDUPER_Wingaling2 ай бұрын
Quran 9:29 Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, nor comply with what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, nor embrace the religion of truth from among those who were given the Scripture,1 until they pay the tax,2 willingly submitting, fully humbled. Islam tells Muslims to fight disbelievers and the context behind the verse is so that the Muslims can get money.
@lukesullivan93442 ай бұрын
@@SUPERDUPER_WingalingChristianity also has verses about fighting non-believers. That’s kind of the point of religion lol
@SUPERDUPER_Wingaling2 ай бұрын
@@lukesullivan9344 There’s a difference between the two. The Quran is telling to fight because of money and this is a command for Muslims for all time not just at that time. In the Bible specifically the Old Testament, God told the Israelites to fight the nations around them because they were practicing evil, not simply because they were non believers. Duet. 9:3-5 Gotta do better research than that not just say what everybody else says. Killing is definitely not the point of Christianity idk where you get that from lol and you don’t have to be a Christian to know that.
@karmandalas5 ай бұрын
I'm quite astonished to see the extent of similarities of Turkiye history with Chinese in the past 200 years. Both countries used to have a glorious history and vast territory but failed in modernizing itself due to the currupted monarch rules. Then they experience an entire century of being humiliated, dissected and colonized by the west. However, the great people led by their leaders fought the bloody war that regained their foothold and independence, shaping what they are currently. Thanks for making the video. Salute to the great people
@zaidkapadia68243 ай бұрын
Except the fact that Ataturk was a puppet
@lonelywolf14802 ай бұрын
Good analogy and summary but I'd like to mention that Turks were never colonized by the west mate. Right after the defeat of the Ottomans in WWI, the Turks under the leadership of Ataturk refused the humiliating terms dictated on them by the treaty of Sevres and started the war of liberation which resulted in victory and led the way to the establishment of the current modern Turkiye.
@BurlapyuiАй бұрын
@@lonelywolf1480An unfortunate event if I say so myself
@αγάπημου-η4ζ12 күн бұрын
They literally talked about how the Mongols and inception of the empire/that was done through the Mongol invasions and they were pushing west and were trying to fight and capture different lands. Istanbul was previously Constantinople and the church was converted to a mosque.
@αγάπημου-η4ζ12 күн бұрын
Also the Chinese were also invaded by the Mongols. The great wall of China was built to discourage the Mongols from invading. Chinese rule was for a time taken over by the mongol rule for some time. So this is not an east vs west thing.
@Irene-m9n8b Жыл бұрын
Sir, it was a period of a long series of battles, bloodletting,harem and intrigues and of course fall of Constantinople becoming Istanbul ,and the discovery of new worlds,industrialization/colonization.
@shaelovebeyonce1445 ай бұрын
My favorite revision of history is European Jews saying that Muslims exiled them and they ended up in Europe when really they converted to Judaism while in Europe and was protected by Muslims against European Christian’s who were out to murder them.
@gabrielleangelica19773 ай бұрын
Correct. I have Sephardic ancestry. The Ottoman empire welcomed the Jews who were kicked out of Spain. Fact.
@MiThreeSunz Жыл бұрын
This was an excellent summarization! Well researched, written, presented and paced. As a history buff, but not an academic, I found it thoroughly interesting and educational. 👍🇨🇦
@lauroandrea324111 ай бұрын
Actually it's not that good. It only appeals to those who aren't much informed.
@diren629811 ай бұрын
@@lauroandrea3241okay what wasn’t shown in this video then?
@rockyetchison338011 ай бұрын
As somewhat of a research and learner of history in M.E I denounce your opinion
@NurG1510 ай бұрын
it would be too long to write n answer@@diren6298
@corvavw64479 ай бұрын
Er zijn inderdaad wat genocide vergeten te vermelden 😂😅geschiedenis? 😮 Alleen wat je uitkomt vertellen😢.
@ozik19126 ай бұрын
Ottoman Empire’s lands in Europe and Africa were bigger than its territories in the middle east. Therefore Ottoman Empire was not a middle east empire. Also the origin of Ottomans was not from middle east. It was from middle Asia, Caucasia… Nothing to do with middle east…
@mohammeduzair77966 ай бұрын
Well constantinople was there capital which is like a bridge between Asia and Europe
@luisgarza352 Жыл бұрын
The Central Powers were Austria-Hungary Empire, Germany, Bulgaria, and the Ottomans
@Ghostracer786 Жыл бұрын
great video
@peterbilther10 ай бұрын
I was just looking to buy a couch
@RegeHisham3 ай бұрын
😂
@571132 ай бұрын
The Ottoman empire, was so beautiful architecture, the gardens , the markets, constanaple. They even kept their own language. Thank you for so much info into a short time. Such a wonderful historical experience. Please consider making more docs on the Ottoman Empire. ❤😊 7:35 7:37 7:38
@hoping513511 ай бұрын
G work
@postscript55497 ай бұрын
Thank you for educating me on this topic. I particularly enjoyed the annotated maps.
@mohammadyousuf6871 Жыл бұрын
At the time of Salim the Ottoman already had conquered Mecca and Madina
@postscript55497 ай бұрын
Interesting. Informative. I will watch a second time. (I do appreciate the brevity.)
@PhillyFaithful937 ай бұрын
Great video.
@Light-at-Dawn6 күн бұрын
I never get tiered of learning about this topic. Great video
@breveennkukan3603 Жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation. Enjoyed it very much.
@sallymcmurray9499 ай бұрын
There is so much more of the Ottomans before Osman.
@micahistory Жыл бұрын
nice video. This was a good overview although the maps should be more accurate next time
@CiCiTemizlikHizmetleri10 ай бұрын
What do you mean directly?
@micahistory9 ай бұрын
what are you confused about?@@CiCiTemizlikHizmetleri
@arvnd-jz5gd3 ай бұрын
Brilliant presentation
@AAH-td7kgАй бұрын
8:35 although the main religion in the Ottoman Empire was Islam, ottomans didn’t force anybody to covert to Islam and gave everyone freedom to practice their religion.This is false. You can also see it portrayed in many Turkish dramas that are made about the Ottoman Empire and Turkish history, that religion was never forced upon anyone.
@piedmontatl10 ай бұрын
It was never called the Byzantium Empire. That was a title assigned by historians hundreds of years later.
@Robespierre-lI9 ай бұрын
Byzantium is a universally accepted historical term. So is "Byzantine Empire.".
@android1759 ай бұрын
@@Robespierre-lIit’s accepted but not accurate
@Bustaperizm6 ай бұрын
@android175 Words convey a meaning and understanding. If when I speak of something. You understand what I am saying referring to. That's what it becomes and is. Maybe you can make a push for the global conscience of the "accurate" name.
@android1756 ай бұрын
@@Bustaperizm the accurate name is what they called themselves. Everything else is an artificial label. You may know what it means, but its a corrupted image of the real historical name.
@mjinzarli3 ай бұрын
@RobespierreThePoof that's not true. He is right. It's a made up term to cover the fact that the Romans were defeated. It sounds better to say the Byzantine empire was defeated. All it is, is historical revisionism and has no truth in it
@gatorspad36323 ай бұрын
Great synopsis, thanks for the history lesson.
@EresirThe1st Жыл бұрын
It's absurd to call the Ottoman Empire religiously tolerant when your only other examples are Christianity and Judaism. They along with Islam are just sects of the same Abrahamic tradition. The Circassians and Ossetians and I'm sure many more examples were pushed into Abrahamism by the Ottomans.
@CemSencar Жыл бұрын
Well they were going to be pushed by the ottoman influence or the Russian encroachment which lead to a reasonable genocide of the circassians in the Caucasus
@bruh8025 Жыл бұрын
There were barely any non-Abrahamic peoples in the Ottoman empire.
@bir_cumle7 ай бұрын
It was the empire you could see and where the most freedom and religious freedom was enjoyed. When Fatih conquered Istanbul, he founded the first Armenian orthodox church. Dozens of churches were built in the Ottoman Empire. He embraced the Jews. He embraced all nations. Otherwise, the Ottomans did not try to Turkify the people under the Seljuk rule for 600 years and 400 years. And in their time there was peace in the orthoeast, except for minor incidents. Until British agents provoked different ethnic groups because of oil.
@Im_here_lol4 ай бұрын
@@bir_cumlereligious freedom where?from what i know at least in balkans at the time,they weren’t really good towards Christians,and destroyed churches?
@Kayhan9Ай бұрын
@@Im_here_lolWhen Fatih conquered Istanbul, he founded the first Armenian orthodox church. Dozens of churches were built in the Ottoman Empire. He embraced the Jews. He embraced all nations
@colindaniels945 Жыл бұрын
The reason for the turmoil in the early 15th Century was Timur The Lame,who very nearly destroyed The Ottoman Empire before it got off the ground What saved it was Timur's sudden death at 35.
@orhanemiratlgan94789 ай бұрын
Wtf? Timur died when he was 68 years old.
@Bruh-cg2fkАй бұрын
so the Ottoman Empire just like Byzantine Empire and Latin Empire had end up surrounded by all sides in Constantinople as last city remaining?
@Storytime24H-Transcendtime15 күн бұрын
The Seven Years' War truly was a pivotal moment in history, shaping nations and global dynamics in profound ways
@Kmancanada5 ай бұрын
This was excellent. Well-told.
@lovlybilly3 ай бұрын
really nice vid. suddenly I get a load more history. thanks
@sessival7 ай бұрын
Amazing documentary!
@philipz-v7d4 ай бұрын
Great presentation... 🎉
@alioriginal25 ай бұрын
Enjoyed the video, however one point of criticism I’ll give is you didn’t mention Cyprus
@rowinginat2 ай бұрын
17:48 what is with his eyes??
@abdisalamalasow9 ай бұрын
Mashaa Allah
@eugenio33684 ай бұрын
Allah 🐖🐖🐖🐖
@ladypamona1238 ай бұрын
Thank God we had a wonderful leader like Ataturk. saved us from the brink of disintegration and exploitation. He was a courageous, visionary and intelligent leader. He gave us the human rights that most countries had to fight for, on a silver platter. He gave us the right to vote and be elected, equality, justice... everything. I wish he had lived longer, our country still needs him.
@abubnis42066 ай бұрын
Ataturk was a crypto jew of Greek ancestry who hated Turkey as it really was and was a Francophile who touched children just like french philosophers. He continued genocide against kurds and came from the same faction as those who committed genocide against the Armenians. He followed barbaric nationalism and was good only as a general. He didn’t modernise anything, apart from committing cultural suicide which still has unfortunate consequences to this day. The ottomans had a parliament much before Ataturk. He is complicit in genocide and should not be worshipped for his only good feat which was saving turkiye from invaders.
@EM.K0244 ай бұрын
😂 you missed the point of the video.
@piedmontatl10 ай бұрын
Trying to figure out why the Ottoman Empire was not called a continuation of the Eastern Roman Empire?
@Mira-cchi9 ай бұрын
It was. The Ottoman sultan called himself "Sultan al Rum". Rum means Rome. So they saw themselves as the continuation of that. People from Turkey were called "Rumi" (from Rome) like the famous sufi poet Rumi. But the west only saw them as a muslim empire
@Robespierre-lI9 ай бұрын
A different dynasty. A different language. A conquest. A different religion. A major historical shift, in essence. But historians do discuss and research the ways in which the Ottomans did, partly, continue to carry on elements of the Eastern Roman Empire. It's also important to acknowledge that the Greek nation and, in some ways, the Bulgarians can claim to be heirs to that tradition. Furthermore, Moscow soon claimed to be the real inheritors of "Rome" So .. yes. Ottoman. That's the accepted historical term in English. Historians try to avoid biasing or explicitly political terminology, at least when possible.
@kespec9 ай бұрын
ottoman rulers were title hunters back than, they first started as Khagans, then became Sultans, followed by Padishah & caliph and Kaiser of Rome
@smart67877 ай бұрын
Not as a continuation, but we can talk about "incorporating" it. Sultan Mehmet II introduces himself as both sultan and "kaiser of Rome."
@starktamilan21799 ай бұрын
I have to say one thing "the sun will never sets on the British empire"
@yuriboyka613128 күн бұрын
British empire was weak compared to these Men. These were Men who didn’t hide behind their religion for personal gain. The conclusion at best of the British empire is “Pax Romana”. A bunch of dudes with washed out Roman blood arguing of who the rightful rulers truly are. All while bathing in filth and drinking wine to stay hydrated because those dunces as they call other people couldn’t well water. Didn’t know how to properly make soap and bathe themselves for Christ sake until The Ottomans showed them what’s up. Another conclusion of them as a whole. Besides a very small percentage of their knights/soldiers/Nobles who walked an honorable path. Most of them were weaklings hiding behind a gun. Attacking people nowhere near as armed as them. Which cutos to them a win is a win these days. But cut out that crap like they added any fruit to society. They simple took the fruit from the trees others planted. That the dunces stumbled upon. All of that garbage. Like in school you learn about Rome. WOW. So fascinating! Until you realize they were a bunch of child f*cking weirdos. Many nobles and men and women with “royal” blood but riddled with disease. Repugnant. Go lie elsewhere.
@kuyucu_13 сағат бұрын
Hadi ordan!!!
@Kienthuc102-r6g2 ай бұрын
video great!
@muharremkoca41 Жыл бұрын
Bugün İsrail ve Filistin olan yerlerden biz 600 sene boyunca barış ve kardeşlik içinde yaşadık ancak İngilizler geldi ve Osmanlıyı yıkıp orta Doğu'da savaşların bitmediği Bir yer olarak dizayn etti.. Filistin'e Özgürlük.. Türkiye'den selamlar
@kenanltv676711 күн бұрын
İngilizce yazsan daha mantıklı olur
@nedasjasudas1837 Жыл бұрын
A video about the history of the Jasudowicz family would be awesome since there isnt much information about them
@furkanbozdag8198 Жыл бұрын
The what
@QuinnKramer-sh1gpАй бұрын
I’m in turkey. That’s why I’m watching this. FACINATING VIDEO!!
@james_giant_peach Жыл бұрын
How much harder is it to say the eastern Roman Empire than to say Byzantine Empire?
@Robespierre-lI9 ай бұрын
Byzantium has been an accepted historical term for a very long time. Why are you being so petty?
@chrisquintero5744 Жыл бұрын
I just wanna know what was israel original size
@mangomadnnesss Жыл бұрын
Non existent
@DucDigital Жыл бұрын
By the time when ottoman empire collapsed, there were no Palestine or Israel state
@diren629811 ай бұрын
@@DucDigitalthere was a protectorate off Palestine and it was shown on old British documentaries, maps,…. Etc
@DucDigital11 ай бұрын
@@diren6298 That's most likely the name of a region. It's like calling Berlin a city. But as a state, Israel and Palestine do not exist.
@Robespierre-lI9 ай бұрын
At what point in history? You can look for the Iron Ave map of Judea and Samaria or the Roman Province of Judea. After that, it's an administrative area of various Islamic empires, briefly a crusader state, then a province of the Ottoman Empire, then a British Protectorate which is where the current shape mostly comes from. You aren't actually asking a simple question.
@cesaraugustoojeda23368 ай бұрын
Oh god, the background music is so beautiful. Does anyone know whats the name or where to find it?
@fatihozturk63002 ай бұрын
you can find similar musics by searching for 'Ottoman Musics, Saray Müzikleri, Ud Taksimi, Tanbur Taksimi, Ney Dinletisi' etc.
@cesaraugustoojeda233620 күн бұрын
@@fatihozturk6300 Thank you!
@ammohamed5320Ай бұрын
History documentaries often explore the Ottoman Empire, founded in 1299 by Osman I and lasting until 1922. At its peak, under the rule of Suleiman the Magnificent (1520-1566), the empire became a dominant global power, stretching across Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa. The conquest of Constantinople in 1453 by Mehmed II marked a significant turning point, ending the Byzantine Empire and establishing Istanbul as the Ottoman capital. Documentaries frequently delve into the empire’s rich cultural and architectural contributions, military conquests, and complex administrative systems that left an enduring legacy on the regions it ruled.
@IanBaluwa6 ай бұрын
This video on the history of the Ottoman Empire is well narrated. Your channel which I follow is an emerging channel on KZbin, but with support from viewers like me and creation of such nice well-explained videos, This is History will surely rise and become a great channel on KZbin. Best of luck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@kyuubiball45548 ай бұрын
8:35 doesnt make sense the ottmans didnt force them to accept islam
@KarynaStoica20082 ай бұрын
The representation of the Ottoman Empire map is innacurate. The Valachia & Moldova were NEVER part of the empire (that is a big chunk of land north of Danube River, west of the Black Sea. The 2 Romanian contries were NEVER lead by a Pasha. They paied Haraci, but they were not under islamic legislation. Also their rullers constantly seeked aid to fight the Ottomans, from their Christian neighbours. Suleiman the Magnifiscent never conquered Moldavia and Valachia. I wonder how many other errors are squised into the narative. I would have enjoyed a more neuthral tone of the narator, instead of the open admiration to an oppressive force that held 1/2 of Europe under threat, especially in the first part of the clip.
@wrensey_YT9 ай бұрын
I finally know why it's Istanbul and not Constantinople
@jowynecampbell22112 ай бұрын
I was completely agape when I realised Istanbul was formerly ( before the takeover by Memet )... astonishing history... Constantinople.....
@Rico-Suave_7 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all in it 21:00
@bijazarakhshi38534 ай бұрын
What's the music in the background?
@HistoryStories-yt6821 күн бұрын
“The history of the Ottoman Empire is a fascinating journey of conquest, culture, and power that shaped the course of civilizations. Are you ready to uncover its remarkable legacy
@UltriLeginaXI Жыл бұрын
I really recommend looking into historical maps before making these videos
@hamdanpirzada397610 ай бұрын
Don't mention the sultans as warlords tho, If you name them war lords them name all of the others as war lord too.
@muhammadzaky8267 Жыл бұрын
Unearthing the Past: A Journey Through History
@abdellahbenoudi13823 ай бұрын
can you tell about Amazighian Saadi dynasty ?
@jonjuraev4 ай бұрын
The Ottoman Empire, founded in 1299 by the visionary Osman I, rose from a small principality to dominate three continents. With the glorious conquest of Constantinople in 1453, the Ottomans transformed it into Istanbul, the heart of an empire that led the world in military might, cultural brilliance, and religious tolerance. Under the leadership of Suleiman the Magnificent, the empire reached its zenith, embodying strength, unity, and honor. Though the empire faced challenges in later centuries, its legacy endures, and from its ashes, the proud Republic of Turkey was born in 1923, continuing the spirit of Ottoman greatness.
@juliancordova58516 ай бұрын
The color you used for their origin made me second-guess my understanding of geography
@kyliekristen684110 ай бұрын
🇹🇷 Ze Power! 😎 The Rise!! 👑
@atillatogan75782 ай бұрын
As the 15th-century palace historian Aşıkpaşazade mentions in the *Menâkıb-ı Âli-i Osman* (The Story of the House of Osman), the dynasty is traced back to Oğuz Khan, the mythical Turkish ruler.
@Duz443 ай бұрын
18:33 Italy were with the Entente not the Central Powers
@bardsamok9221Ай бұрын
The Triple Entente was formed through three agreements: Franco-Russian Alliance: Formed in 1894 Entente Cordiale: Formed in 1904 between France and Britain Anglo-Russian Entente: Formed in 1907 The Triple Entente was a response to the Triple Alliance, which was formed between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The Triple Entente was the core of the Allied Powers in World War I.
@bilalabawi9064 Жыл бұрын
Great video. Love it.
@douwe9813Ай бұрын
May all the people who have died in different empires, rest in peace🕊️🙏🏻
@fikripala4160 Жыл бұрын
there,s quite a few inaccuracies
@hanifisert6603 Жыл бұрын
Are you cry 😂
@pv4669 Жыл бұрын
If so, please elaborate.
@CharlesD-qb9nm10 ай бұрын
People who know any inaccuracies should comment them (and maybe even give a way to research it). I do not know enough about this subject, so I think it would be helpful to work together to clear anything up.
@tomasmiller5502 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for summarizing The Ottoman Empire, which was always a weak link in my education, although very important. I hope that you shall create a video on The German Empire, which will be much more tricky than with the other empires. Sometimes it looks to me that the Germans colonized the USA (instead of emigrating there) in the 19th century, which may be the tricky card of their imperial power ...
@SRAMLiraium Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣 STOP LİE YOUnİDİOT
@furkanbozdag8198 Жыл бұрын
@@SRAMLiraiumwhat lies
@SRAMLiraium Жыл бұрын
@@furkanbozdag8198 OTTOMANS ALWAYS WEAK ??🤣.
@furkanbozdag8198 Жыл бұрын
@@SRAMLiraium they were never weak
@Paydro787 Жыл бұрын
He said it was a weak link in his education!
@Bh-jf2bu11 күн бұрын
Roman, Ottomo, Persian empire?
@umutucar Жыл бұрын
There are only two states in history that have ruled many nations for centuries. Rome and Ottoman. The only difference of the Ottoman Empire is that there are many religions. There was no such thing in Rome. What the Ottomans did was more difficult. That's why Turks are the most skillful nation in running a state in the world. The reason for its collapse was that the wealth in the state administration led to laziness. They caught the industrial revolution very late. However, it was demolished only 100 years ago. In fact, no one destroyed it, only the Turks moved to a more modern formation. Also, if you pay attention, the direction of the Turks is always west. They were not very interested in the east side. That's why they are always open to development and their potential is still high.
@SCP_FOUNDATİON-511 ай бұрын
This ottoman is a little bit wrong. North african borders (libya) were bigger than that.
@diren629811 ай бұрын
I mean straight lines never existed in borders back then so alot was wrong
@cdunne116 ай бұрын
Does anyone know the release date?
@rcl99tlr65 Жыл бұрын
Who else is here to understand the history of how Israel became what it is today? So from my understanding, Palestine was an Ottoman empire which then became affiliated with Germany after the Ottoman's decided to join forces with them during WW1. They lost control after Britain and other countries defeated Germany and its allies- leaving Palestine under control of Great Britain.
@mattd362811 ай бұрын
it says in video palestine was safe under ottoman but what they did they rebellion with british and now they f*cked so they did themselves
@HatredForMankind9 ай бұрын
Please dont try to understand history from videos, whose main intent is to get clout. Instead, read academic or encyclopedic sources which are very common thanks to the internet. Palestine was under Ottoman dominion, and Arabs sided with the Allied forces against the Ottoman Turks, and Brits betrayed the arabs after defeating the Axis powers in WW1
@HectorBan7 ай бұрын
Genesis 12:1. The LORD appeared to Abram and said, "To your offspring [or seed] I will give this land." - Exodus 5:22 6:12 Therefore, say to the Israelites: ‘I am the Lord, and I will bring you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians. I will free you from being slaves to them, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with mighty acts of judgment. 7 I will take you as my own people, and I will be your God. Then you will know that I am the Lord your God, who brought you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians. 8 And I will bring you to the land I swore with uplifted hand to give to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob. I will give it to you as a possession. I am the Lord.’” Israel was given by God to the jewish people thousands of years ago. Before the existence of Palestine. Who are you to say what God can do. Until you agree with God about isreal belonging to the jewish people. God will never forgive any of your sins for undermining his authority and position
@angelaperpetuaarguelles46827 ай бұрын
why the Ottomans did not conquer the Philippines?
@zeynepibragimkyzy13886 күн бұрын
Kazakhstan Mongolia , Russia and KYRGYZSTAN 1:25
@JoeyJoejoe-sq9io14 күн бұрын
I thought I busted you when you kept referring to Istanbul as Constantinople. But it's name changed around 1920 according to Poe AI. Never knew that.
@peterlezamaify10 ай бұрын
We must remember at that time there was no such thing call Islam The ottoman practice Mohammadism not Islam
@AvikJ257 ай бұрын
The fall of Constantinople of Byzantine Emperor and the invent of Ottoman Empire is the start of European Traders expansion to India, which resulting the Portuguese Trade start at India from 1498 and after that 1608 East India Company who initially start to trade but they proved themselves in future the biggest imperial trading Company of world, not only that they become most powerful largest colonial rule of world. This emerging power of colonial rule is the reason why ottoman empire declined. The British imperial power, French imperial power, dutch imperial power, Portuguese imperial power and the rest of all imperial powers of colonial rule are emerging their power and started World War.
@siriusfeline3 ай бұрын
The Ottomans...imagine, a culture based entirely on putting your feet up.