The Fascinating History of Ancient India's Cultural and Historical Roots...

[@hawkingdawking4572]

Quite a bad video. It shows late Medieval structures and claim as those are from the "Vedic period". Those paintings are from the post Mughal era having 2000 years of gap. 😂😂😂😂😂 Shame on you.

[@sci-shastraq1429]

It seems you are uneducated. Search about Bhimbetka cave paintaing, chariots and swrods found in SInauli, harappa site, Mohenjo daro site, not one but hundreds and thousands of structures dating back to more then 5000 years

[@Rohit-jc2sm]

False, eurocentric view of history.

[@KumarSriramasamy]

It is unfortunate with some truths and some lies....makes this video irrelevant.....appears to question the reason behind this video?! Is it trying to create wedge between Indus valley civilization and the current Indian civilization ??

[@bitsbytes4454]

How exactly did you conclude that Vedas are from 1500 to 500 BC ?

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@bitsbytes4454 gap dekh ke ghusa diya 😁

[@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej]

Ya it's more old

[@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej]

Check Google

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej Google is not a reference source. Grow up 🤣.

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej in the same Google youl find sources which say Vedas are much later than IVC.

[@SeemaWrites1000]

Indus Valley people who were before the Vedic period were well settled, i.e, agriculturalists, traders, town planners. 4:28 Conflicting information. Tribes were established agriculturalists long before the latter half of the Vedic period. Agriculture was the basic technology, warfare was a far advanced technology. If they fought wars as coalition groups, then farming would have been flourishing too.

[@penoge]

Stupid interpretation! The Indus-Sarasvati Civilisation cannot be pre-vedic! This can be seen from the fact that the found seals were obviously showing religious scenes based on the Veda while there were neither private nor public places of worshipping found in the cities of this civilisation. This could only mean that these seals were from an earlier (vedic) period and that means the IVC is post-vedic as already Srimad Bhagavatam 12.1.39 (and the Veda itself of course!) suggests.

[@penoge]

And I just want to remind you that the Yadavas of Krishna were settled down while being ranchers (cow breeder) and they were vedic people.

[@Saraswathiputra]

No that you people are wrong by repeating old stories. Dont know what is in recent archeological discoveries like Saraswathi river as exactly told in Rigveda which existed as such mighty river only in 6000 years before as a minimum lower limit which pushed vedic age thousnads year before!! These are most elaborate scientific dating and study! There is no Aryan invasion in India but Aryan migration from ancient India after ten kings war or Dasarajna as per Rigveda! Improve!!

[@captainjackuniversal]

there is no evidence that indus valley civilisation existed, it could have been first phase of vedic civilisation

[@veshrajshrestha3710]

Time to discredit western version. Always 1500 bc for vedas😂😂. Recent sanauli excavation has chariot and shopisticated bronze weapons has carbon dating of 2000bc. Intellectual decline of American 😂😂😂

[@shawnmichealos1871]

Sanauli excavation was said to be a bullochart as their was no spoked wheel because in chariots spoked wheel should be there during that time, also, 1500bcs is the composition date of the Vedas , the ideas might have been there even before

[@shawnmichealos1871]

Also...wdym American? That date is what is main stream and accepted by all historians and archeologists from different countries

[@drashokkumar9209]

RIGVEDA was certainly composed before 2,000 BC . More likely before 2500 BC . Geographic spread of RIGVEDA people was from GANGA in the East to current Afghanistan as evident from. RIGVEDA itself . VEDIC CIVILIZATION and so-called Indus Valley Civilization were IDENTICAL . Maximum number of human settlements have been found on the banks of Ancient SARASWATI river . 1500 BC to 600 BC as the time of VEDIC period is complete Nonsense. Just consider the volume of VEDIC literature -- 4 VEDIC Samhitas ( RIGVEDA SAMHITA alone is 1000+ pages ) . Several BRAHMANAs and AARAYAKAs , 100+ UPANISHADS . 100+ books on 6 VEDANGAs , 6 schools of philosophy , books on Medicine , Surgery , Veterinary care , Mathematics . All this literature had been written BEFORE BUDDHA ( 6th century BC ) . All on Bhojapatras . Most of these 15:19 so-called scholars are not aware this vast intellectual output . All this was made possible by inventing the FINEST GRAMMAR on earth . Proponents of AIT/AMT want us to believe that " Invading Aryans captured 80 % of Indian landscape ( that is more than 3 million sq.kms ) in 700 -800 years ( 1500 - 600 BC ) . Not only that , they decimated all non-Aryan languages . Even Harry Potter books are more credible than this Aryan Invasion/Migration theory .

[@veshrajshrestha3710]

@@shawnmichealos1871 does your father told you or your jesus decoit told you🤣🤣🤣. How to make chariot is written in rig veda with full engineering about 2500 bc. Your so called so called super power America was not there and your ancestors were doing huhuhaha in jungle 😁😁. Don't be over smart. Time will come soon then will be actual mathematics about your commn sense😁😁🤣🤣wait and watch🤣🤣. Eastern secret agent😁

[@shawnmichealos1871]

@@drashokkumar9209 I'm pretty sure the 1500bc isn't accurate but it is also given around 2500bc too, also , the IVC and Vedic civilizations weren't identical at all, i don't know form l where U got this idea ,the AMT isnt as same as AIT, AMT is the mainstream idea and is different from AIT, there are solid sources , both archaeological and genetic to claim such a theory, and to say IVC isn't as same as Vedic civilization,pls go through it,the books u have mentioned have been updated for years and aren't in the same time from and have also been interpolated, also, the Saraswati river, there are instances in the Right Veda, where there are two different descriptions of the Saraswati river, the earliest one could be identified as the "haraxavati" refer in modern day Afghanistan, the modern name itself seems to be an corrupted version of the original name, and the later river being ghakkar river in India i believe, they are archeologists,historians, genetic scientists of many nationalities , including from asia and India working on it, so i urge u to go deeper into it and understand and think for yourself.

[@EyeWill714]

What about the OUTCASTS??

[@rishikeshwagh]

dasyus

[@stormraider6834]

Here comes another guy only interested in caste For your information casteism started in later period, corruption started later

[@penoge]

What if "Dalits" only mean Dal eaters?

[@EyeWill714]

@@penoge what if penoge means penis ogre?

[@rishikeshwagh]

@@penoge What if 'Tathastu' only mean That ass tho

[@utubetruthteller]

nonsense, vedic period is older than indus Valley civilization which in turn is atleast 5000 years old

[@vadirajacsvadirajacs1360]

Yes true that you are saying these western historians and philosophers Manipulate the truth

[@MatthewPhillips-v5o]

Ahhhh...no.

[@utubetruthteller]

@@MatthewPhillips-v5ohey hey boy read more, how will you know when you yourself converted for 1 bag of rice

[@Perseusnaveen]

Source: trust me bro 😅

[@AR-ml9eo]

Once again the Hindutva reactionaries crawl out of their cesspools to promote their religious nonsense. 😂😂

[@thesjkexperience]

We watch like it wasn’t “us” that lived those lives.

[@seemadar4331]

Das doesn't mean enemy! The facts are not totally correct

[@rishikeshwagh]

IT MEANS GARBAGE

[@athensmajnoo3661]

It means slave

[@mtk3755]

It did mean earlier later meaning changed

[@ganeshmungal3251]

This video is purposely false to create confusion to distort Indian history.

[@efstratiosfilis2290]

Well the Indian government wants us all to believe that the cities & temples under the sea east of Tamil Naadu were built at about 500AD! It is so obvious that they were built when that area was dry land. Graham Hancock discovered these cities.

[@Epicproduct-g2o]

How did you achieve that smooth camera movement in this video?

[@AintNoFossil]

13:06 Further north* in the Swat River Valley

[@ashishjx99]

Where is the proof of vedic period? On basis of which proof Rigveda is oldest text?

[@Saraswathiputra]

Dont know what is in recent archeological discoveries like Saraswathi river as exactly told in Rigveda which existed as such mighty river only in 6000 years before as a minimum lower limit which pushed vedic age thousnads year before!! These are most elaborate scientific dating and study! There is no Aryan invasion in India but Aryan migration from ancient India after ten kings war or Dasarajna as per Rigveda! Improve!!

[@Saraswathiputra]

See paleochannels by sattellite images of dried river Saraswathi by yourself online !!

[@ashishjx99]

@@Saraswathiputra isn't the river mentioned in Jain and Buddhist texts. If the river is mentioned in Jain and Buddhist texts then both religions are as old as 6000 year old. Why the logic is only applicable to Hinduism texts?

[@PratUshh]

​@@ashishjx99 Hinduism is THE oldest religion inthe world by a margin. Jainism and Buddhism demerged from it later

[@ashishjx99]

@@PratUshh Jainism is the oldest religion Hinduism and Buddhism emerged from it.

[@user-io8st9fu5g]

There was never a period called Vedic period in india sub continent. It’s just a myth same like Ramayana and Mahabharata.

[@seshagirivemuri6503]

Shri Nilesh Oak has timed Mahabharata at 7000BC and a great Flood in 5525 BC ,submerging of Dwarka matches this time period. The great Flood has proofs all over the world including artic icecap.He timed Ramayana at 14000 BC proves it with historic events and planetary positions of astrologic charts, like Rama's birth chart etc and Indian astrology and astronomy were highly developed.

[@krisi7562]

Much ancient Indian history is 'informed hindsight'. This video's is as good as any.

[@jitenmehra17]

Indias dark age

[@yahqappu74]

What is Hinduism? +++++++++++++++ I have long pondered on what constitutes this so called religion that is sitting on the head of my Tamizh people and have come up with some conclusions .... The priest from the Zoroastrian religion came to india with their Avestan language and fire rituals and later created some slogans in old Sanskrit to form the Vedas which was never written down. These priest learnt the principles of the Samana tradition that originated in the southern part of the sub continent namely in the Tamizh tradition and started incorporating it into their already existent vaiteegam rituals and produced the Upanishads and became vegetarians. For a solid philosophical footing which they needed in a highly philosophical Tamizh infused land about the 8th century Adi Sankara came up with Advaita logic that distorted the original Buddhist thoughts and produced a dichotomical nonsense which did not last the test of time. Later they took up the Tantric Samana Tamizh tradition and put forth the bakti religiosity. This they took also from the Christian tradition and desperately created for the Islamic onslaught. Bakti was based on erotism and appealed to the masses. The high Samana tantric philosophical basis was ruined for the newly conjectured 'Hindu' religion of the wretched puranic tales. This is the history of the Priestly class(Brahmins) that still retain their priesthood in the agamic temples that held sway through the bakti movement from the 10th century onwards. The consecutive non-Tamizh rulers firmly rooted the new found 'Hindu' religion with its caste system( the four varnas) that the British gave the final seal to....

[@dmddesire]

Hello, Before make a reportage, it is credible to verify the authenticity of date… Just for the knowledge of viewers, the river Saraswathi river was dried out before 1500 bce, in Vedas, it is mentioned how people had been lived near by this river. Hence Vedic period is more than 1500 bce … Making money is good but propagating false knowledges is a crime!

[@saddha1]

This is false, no such thing as Vedic age- no archeological evidence has been found for the Vedas or even Sanskrit- none. No king had anything written in Sanskrit- none. Even Mitanni language was Prakrit not Sanskrit.

[@mercilessDharma]

marxist historian spotted

[@sachinpotdar7798]

It has our kings were there

[@penoge]

Vedic age means: the age when most of the hymns of the Veda were inspired which was in Dvaparayuga the case (the hymns from Tretayuga are much less in number). Another question is when the hymns were compiled to form the Veda as we know it which could even have been at the beginning of the Kaliyuga.

[@penoge]

And Mitanni mentions Indra which is the vedic name of the king of the gods! Thinking is not your thing it seems.

[@RoamMeYo]

I understand you need a source of income, but twisting the history with little to no sense of it will only create more confusion to the future people. Not a good way to evolve for sure.

[@wassaw7043]

Goojeets here vomiting our cibilization is gorillion years old... we were the besht.. this izz kolonial historii

[@A_GoogIe_User]

Hi, please note that a few minutes in the audio is not very good, some strange sounds can be heard whenever you speak.

[@vgyt675]

It's AI voice in western accent to fool the Indians...typical Brahmin ploy.

[@Channelchannel8261]

I just wonder how the aryan barbarians got the knowledge to write the vedas.

[@azjahptgrg730]

There is no written Sanskrit written in BC period. Without the language the vedas are nothing. The Babylonians, Egyptians everyone was writing. Vedas and Sanskrit are in AD. Please share proof before big claims.

[@UmangTrikam]

Vedas are BC not AD facts from the west we know better now than to trust those dates

[@EyeWill714]

Prakrit before Sanskrit, and Tamil predates them both

[@ranapratapsingh3416]

Utter non-sense. Vedic Sanskrit predates both of them . Go and read carefully Vedic texts. This is not Tamil Nadu and you can't make people fools out of it with your idiotic propaganda.

[@sahilsingh6048]

Oldest written record of sanskirt is mittani tablet 3400 years old.

[@saddha1]

That’s not Sanskrit that’s Prakrit, it says Indara not Indra as Sanskrit would. No Sanskrit text or writing has been found predating Buddhism. The brahmanical texts may have been composed in Sanskrit later and were originally Prakrit. Buddha called this language Chandas not Sanskrit.

[@mercilessDharma]

lol nice try, rig veda goes back to 20000 BC, most words in tamil r taken from sanskrit. u dravidian cry baby lolll

[@mercilessDharma]

@@saddha1 sanskrit goes back before 15000 BC atleast lmao ramayana and mahabarat research done by nilesh oak, sanskrit is father of all indo european languages as well

[@franklinkarunakaran5829]

We can consider that tbe vedas are born in Iran later came to I ndia.

[@sdasgupta1950]

I totally agree with several of the comments below. I stopped watching after the 1st minute since the stated timeline of the vedic period is itself wrong. Why put up such content when so much good information is already out there. If you are talking about actual history then do the research and put up actual history.

[@drashokkumar9209]

Ignorance of the presenter is "awesome " .

[@Sandy-rv9tv]

Vedic period is at least 7000 BC !!!

[@sdatt7878]

The Vedic period is before 15,000 BC to 5,000 BC. U spread British colonial disinformation ! Iron age came to India at least 5000 BC, Indus valley is later regional Vedic period some 5-6000 BC.

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

That's bullshit Vedas are not older then 3,500 BCE it was Bhrigu Rishi's who first sung the hymns of Rig Veda in the court of King Bharata and it was this time from 3,500 BCE-2,500 BCE this 1,000 years of period is dominated by Rural and Pastoral lifestyle it is only after this period from 2,500 BCE to 1,700 BCE Urbanization started and then again Ruralisation started from 1,700 BCE onwards upto until 600 BCE

[@sahilsingh6048]

Pajeeet✅

[@sirchad9443]

​@@user-cl9bd1tz3bthe Saraswati River was almost completely gone by 3,500 BCE. Go learn something!

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

@@sirchad9443 what's the source

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

@@sirchad9443 give the source for that

[@No_baggage_av]

There were no class of dasyu. Dasyu term is reference to sea pirates .arab dacoits. Also called daaku.

[@Saman_Sangh]

The NARRATOR does not know what he is talking off, or purposefully misleading. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 Dasa = Slave not enemy Ari (from Arian) = ENEMY (in ancient language PALI/PRAKRIT)

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@Saman_Sangh Ari = comprehend in Dravidian language. And supposedly it's the root of ariya (older form of Arya).

[@penoge]

​@@goddalehundibharathraj4374Nonsense! The developement of language is from simple to complex not from complex to simple. Also the word Aryans doesn't mean a tribe or a race (that was a stupid interpretation of 19th century Brits) but a culture, the sharing of same believes and customs. That is already visible from the claimed meaning of the word as "noble people" which obviously refers to a behaviour. And by the way it is identical with the Egyptian term Piromis told by Herodot which also means noble people. And that is no coincidence!

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@penoge yes Ari is simple.. ariya is it's derivative.. Arya is a corrupted form of it.

[@penoge]

​​@@goddalehundibharathraj4374Nonsense! Learn to use your brain!

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@penoge you should learn some facts for once. Not peddle some comic stories all the time.

[@veerendraekbote5247]

All wrong, Vedic period existed in Bharat from 20000 BC after last Ice age. No information of Vedic dynasties such as Solar starting from Manu & neither Lunar starting from Soma is mentioned. This video is based on British rule created false Aryan invasion theory rather Out of India Aryan migration is true based on Vedic literatures.

[@mercilessDharma]

This is Marxist history, immediately we can tell it’s crap knowledge. Just copy paste link of Nilesh oak that’s what I’m doing

[@lijjo1986]

Good. You are now eligible for $angh funds. Pls contact the nearest $hakha or Hq in Nagpoor

[@rishikeshwagh]

wrong.

[@penoge]

​@@rishikeshwaghHave you ever read the Veda?

[@penoge]

According to the astronomical dates given in the Veda even before that! But it is already stupid to think the Veda was written at a certain time. It is a compilation of hymns from different yugas which are not arranged chronologically but according to the needs of the Brahmins (which were only created in Dvaparayuga according to Purusha Suktam in Rigveda 10.90).

[@Khagun_Kalki]

This ancient symbol is what will bring you goodwill,self-awareness,good luck and blessings for you, your family, neighbours and the nation of BHARAT The two triangles that form the six edged star. The three points of the first triangle signifies , the father, mother and child , the basis of a family that in turn is the foundation of society and nation. the three point of the second triangle is based on a society based on knowledge, will and action The circle signifies the sun The crescent is the moon , which signifies humanity living in harmony with nature The Agni trishul signifies the three pointed flame( past , present and future) which also means the through fire there is destruction and rebirth from ego and negative mind. The trishul also signifies , the trinity of Bharma , Indra and Shiva The dot in the middle of the star signifies the individual, the single person that is the beginning of family and society who is self aware, self practicing and mindful in his speech though and actions and this persons self awareness rise through the dual practice of Yoga ( body) and meditation (mind) white, signifying purity and also that all basic colours are seen when the white light is put through a prism And the back ground is sky blue , reflecting the sky and ocean, signifying the eternal, also in this world where people are mislead and mislead others in caste and colour of one’s skin and discriminate, the blue also signifies the physical proof of the Bhramas mark of blessing and equality of all mankind, every child is marked by Bhramas own hand at the time of birth, from the north of Indian to the south , the neel mark that is always present on the backs of every child , as real and clearly as the eyes can see, the equality and beauty of (Bhramas) creation. May Bharat rise again from ignorance and violence towards one neighbours May Bharat rise again, on a society that is immersed in knowledge will and action May the individual Bharati always rise through the individual practice of YOGA and MEDITATION. May Bharat be united again in thought , mind and action May Bharat lead the world in the reawakening of the world and universal consciousness . HAR HAR MAHADEV HAR GHAR MAHADEVA

[@tm-ankit9067]

2024 mey kon dekh raha 😮

[@Kokomo-tj9er]

rubbish.

[@samskarebyaha]

Absolute nonsense

[@hawkingdawking4572]

There was no such Vedic civilization with those stone temples. Hindu temples of those nature fairly new. Vedic Iranian migrants didn't have idols or temples.

[@xijinping9024]

First of all your theory itself is incorrect 😂. Vedic iranians??😂😂 seriously They were called indo iranians not vedic iranians. And before zoroastriasm and islam whole iran technically follow nature worshiper which is based on hinduism and thier gods 😂😂😂....

[@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej]

Vedic Iranian 😂😂😂

[@penoge]

​​@@xijinping9024Correct! And the Iranians and others were originally part of the vedic culture which the Avesta clearly shows. They were expelled from India after the 10 tribes were defeated by Sudas which you can read in Rigveda. This war was happening because of a religious controversy in which the ten tribes wanted to continue the worshipping of the Vasus (the eight ruling gods of the Daityas) and called the Devas "Asuras" while Sudas and his followers wanted to worship the Devas and called the Daityas "Asuras". That's the difference between the Iranian and Indian part of the vedic culture. And the overthrowing of the Daityas by the Devas according to Herodot took place about 17.500 BC.

[@MIRAAJMUHAMMAD_666]

As per historical point of view Islam has come 1400 yrs ago but Islamic Point of view Islam existed from the beginning of the mankind​@@xijinping9024

[@nathancassel7883]

the great working is complete. I have received gnosis. rebuild the myths the clans and the guilds

[@juuskanda]

Quakademia

[@AmmiV2]

Tribal aryans

[@Saman_Sangh]

INDUS valley civilization DID NOT FALL. It is carried FORWARD as BUDDHISM to today’s INDIAN culture.

[@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej]

Indus civilization is not buddhist

[@swarupbanerjee147]

Indus valley civilization is believed to be ended in 1900 BCE and Buddhism was founded in 600 BCE...so your comment doesn't makes any sense!

[@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej]

@@swarupbanerjee147 yes

[@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej]

@@Saman_Sangh without knowledge don't comment

[@sahilsingh6048]

Buddha was a blue eyed aryan

[@Saman_Sangh]

VEDIC period was a RURAL culture. INDUS valley civilization is URBAN Civilization.

[@BHAGWA.enbdhdjskej]

IN Indus civilization Swastik are found go and see

[@penoge]

Stupid interpretatation! Rigveda shows something different.

[@No_baggage_av]

There is no sacrifice in vedas. Self fasting is.

[@penoge]

Nonsense! The whole Veda is about sacrificing to the gods!

[@Saman_Sangh]

The CONCEPT of GOD and Vedic Stories were brought by BRAHMIN from central ASIA to India.

[@penoge]

You are telling nonsense! Are you polititian?

[@Jayaramyk]

Are you from missionary?

[@penoge]

​@@JayaramykIdiot! I'm not even Hindu.

[@penoge]

​@@JayaramykI'm not an idiot like you!

[@sekharkishore2418]

Bad research, it’s much much much older 😂😂😂😂

[@glennsimonsen8421]

"music" is absolutely crap. unlistenable.

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

According to genetics steppe pastoralists migrations to India happened after 700bc. They are the ones who got indo-european (sanskrit like) languages.

[@rishikeshwagh]

not true. The migration started around 1900 BCE

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@rishikeshwagh it's neeraj rais claim. At the best R1A1* can be stretched back to 700bc.

[@rishikeshwagh]

@@goddalehundibharathraj4374 source ?

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@rishikeshwagh kzbin.infoUgkxjOSeXw2mvyVnLzTx4bpg_ERHUYoEZwlz

[@goddalehundibharathraj4374]

@@rishikeshwagh संवाद # 11: Scientist Dr Niraj Rai explains why days of Aryan Invasion/Migration Theory are numbered. ... His conversation on the channel 'vaad' with the above title. At 23:00 minutes.

[@aidanmacdougall9250]

Such a fascinating culture, great to learn about it's early inception 😊

[@No_baggage_av]

Indo European is nothing actually. Indins are entirely indigenous. There is zero mention of Europe etc in vedas. In ashwamedha ritual no sacrifice was made of animal. Its against vedas. The most badic concept of vedas in non violence. But violence on the evil doers is alsi important. Women weak , children old etc are to be protected . That is basic dharm. All the hindu gods have fought with those who are violent on women.

[@NCM-xy8ow]

Not Europe. Indo Aryans from Central Asia

[@No_baggage_av]

@@NCM-xy8ow aryans is not a race . It comes sanskrit word Arya which means a cultured person of good character.

[@NCM-xy8ow]

@@No_baggage_av Sanskrit came from the Aryans. It's a fact. Learn some actual history using historical facts, not tales and myths . Lol

[@mtk3755]

​@@NCM-xy8ow u read Some history sanskrit was made here proto indo iranian and proto sanskrit was brought.

[@penoge]

​@@NCM-xy8owNonsense!

[@ranapratapsingh3416]

Please avoid saying 1500 BCE for the start of Vedic period in Bharat. Vedic period starts at around 6000 BCE or even much earlier.

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

No it's 3,500 BCE the correct age when Veda's started to be passed as Shruti and another thing it was from King Bharata's court where Bhrigu Rishi's started it

[@sahilsingh6048]

Pajeeet ✅

[@sirchad9443]

​@user-cl9bd1tz3b the Rig Veda dates back to at least 20,000 BCE.

[@user-cl9bd1tz3b]

@@sirchad9443 How do you know that.

[@sirchad9443]

Astronomy dating and geological descriptions in the Vedas. Nilesh Oak has many videos you can watch to find out more.

[@MIRAAJMUHAMMAD_666]

Indian civilization is lakhs of years old or more than that but europeans simply say 1100 bce - 500 bce hahaha Indus valley civilisation is older lakhs of years ago n Mesopotamia civilisation on the other side

[@brijeshkumarmithaulia7413]

You said that Parikshit was a Kuru. Excuse me please. He was son of Arjuna and was a son of Pandu dynasty. Kuru dynasty was completely destroyed and terminated in the Mahabharata war.

[@i876-l4m]

he was arjun's grand son

[@LowerTheBoom]

Did you know that ancient Indians actually like to use the swasticka.

[@KKPR533]

We still use them

[@ivanfranco2363]

Except that to them it was a luck symbol and to some rather primitive modern humans it means they are better than others just by the dumb luck of being born white

[@ramanujadasa121]

😂😂😂🤣