Sometimes hearing the same information from a different person helps very much!
@sadhanajoseph23206 ай бұрын
I agree with you.
@سارة-ط6ق1ي5 жыл бұрын
يا رجُل ماهذا الشرح الجمييييل ، شرح مُبسط وجميل ♥️♥️♥️♥️👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@abdulrhman.37424 жыл бұрын
كملتي معه ولا ؟ عندي اختبار بكره.
@Rahul-hp5ie4 жыл бұрын
I swear to study thermodynamics eagerly if he's my professor.Deserves a lot of subscribers and likes.
@heliumteam1514 жыл бұрын
Me watching this 5 min shit after studying this for 13 hours straight in a complex way and dreaming about this video to be enough for my exam ....
@Maxz-lg1et2 ай бұрын
For those who are confuse, there's two perspective here System (mostly use in chemistry) and the Surrounding (mostly use in physics), W = Q + W (chemistry) (system's perspective) >When W is negative (-W) work is done by system, >When W is positive (+W) work is done on the system W = Q - W (physics) When W is negative (-W), work is done by the system When W is positive (+W), work is done on the system
@Zempie2 ай бұрын
you just wrote the same convention pair twice.
@loreenzo2120Ай бұрын
@@Zempie not rly cuz the equation is different
@ZempieАй бұрын
@@loreenzo2120 I meant the description of the equation. it should be opposite for one of the scenarios
@loreenzo2120Ай бұрын
@@Zempie huh, yeah, the signs should be flipped for the last one
@cherylbauman95104 жыл бұрын
Why couldn’t you have been my professor in college? You explain everything perfectly!
@thanos54663 жыл бұрын
U should do study My girl 😂😂
@fishplayztoh3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@jefrreyjeffery21922 жыл бұрын
You study this in college. We study this is in 10th grade in asia💀☠️☠️
@anuragchaudhary63072 жыл бұрын
@@jefrreyjeffery2192 We study this in college too, we do more than this, but I'm coming back to the basics, Also Asian here.
@Evangeline_Hansen Жыл бұрын
@@anuragchaudhary6307maybe you two live in two different countries/regions ,after all Asia is a big place
@maelscott7212 Жыл бұрын
Great video, one thing you missed that I think is important is if U = q - w or = q + w depending on which subject you're taking. I know that physicists and biomedical engineers use +w.
@shreya_0412 Жыл бұрын
This is my confusion too... When to use which one?
@wetworksyt4446 Жыл бұрын
@@shreya_0412if work is being done on the system, w will be will be positive and the equation will be U=q+w. If work is being done by the system, w will be negative and the equation will be U=q-w.
@aurickbiswas82339 ай бұрын
@@shreya_0412 in chemistry work done by the system is negative and in physics work don by system is positive. Think of it like physics is oriented with profit and loss while chemistry is more about caring about the system like a baby😅
@Sulfuricacid__1403 жыл бұрын
i want all Teachers as you. You explain a lot of things in few minutes.Thank you..
@TomBrooklyn2 жыл бұрын
As always, clear, and most importantly, concise. No wasted words or time. Well done, Professor Dave
@nischalchhetri74452 жыл бұрын
I don't know if I have gotten this all wrong, but isn't the sign convention explained here wrong? 1) Work done by the system- (-w) 2) Work done on the system (+w) This is what I have learned. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Edit- So this tutorial was for physics, not chemistry. Anyways, it's more interesting to discover that we use different sign conventions in physics.
@markvillacampa43147 ай бұрын
I am looking for a validation of my understanding of the work done on the system because I feel like what is in the video is wrong, and I found this comment hahahaha. I searched for the work done on the system in physics and, similarly in chemistry, they are positive. So the video is indeed wrong.
@AR14SigmaGulfam4 ай бұрын
Yes, video is telling wrong about the sign conventions.
@abhi224 ай бұрын
@@markvillacampa4314 The video isn't wrong. He has changed the signs in the equations too. So the equations will always work. It's just a different perspective to look at.
@borapadmanabham36763 ай бұрын
Yes work done on the system is positive, work done by the system is negative
@legendaryx2k193 ай бұрын
Well the sign convention don't matter much as long as they are opposite in any case
@vaishnavipatil29724 жыл бұрын
Best video for understanding the concept
@MattMattMat6 ай бұрын
Professor Dave is definitely still saving educational lives years later with these videos
@WritersDigest-b8f11 ай бұрын
Exhaust stroke & also intake stroke are adiabatic processes because no heat is added or removed in the processes and internal energy reduces in exhaust stroke and internal energy is added in the suction stroke. Accordingly work is done by the system reducing the internal energy in the exhaust process and accordingly work is done on the system to shoot up the internal energy in the suction process.
@USArmyVeteranOIFandOEF3 жыл бұрын
Awesome visual examples and simplified to absorb the information being released, making understanding and keeping it in so much easier. Thank you, Prof. Dave!
@tommysheehan21363 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave helping me cram for the physics GRE, what a hero
@derrickdanso663111 ай бұрын
You're making me fall for thermodynamics. Thank you so much
@VishnooSpotlights5 жыл бұрын
We need more professors like you in India ...
@skullmax35952 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@Vagdebrume7 жыл бұрын
You do an amazing job ♥ !
@Luke-t4f3x Жыл бұрын
3:29 dude you're wrong bro... If work is done on the system, its sign is positive. If work is done by the system, its sign is negative.
@Kyrmen-b4h4 ай бұрын
Right 👍
@prishaendait86214 ай бұрын
its because the sign convention used here is valid for physics but not chemistry and I think he made it from physics point of view.
@minimidder20257 жыл бұрын
Why does this channel have so few subscribers???!! You're amaze man! Thanks! ❤
@khaledzainel-dein37665 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your brilliant explanation
@v2sisters1386 жыл бұрын
Amazing video! But please specify that this is from physics' point of view. according to chemistry the signs are different. This kind of induces confusion. THANK YOU!
@sychomadman5 жыл бұрын
thank you so much. i thought i was going crazy.
@na-chan1635 жыл бұрын
@Mohamed Sherif how is that so?
@fatimaisra91435 жыл бұрын
@@na-chan163 the surrounding energy is the atmosphere's energy and the system's energy is the internal energy
@na-chan1635 жыл бұрын
Fatima Isra work done by system (expansion) is negative for chemistry but positive for physics. Can you pls explain this?
@fatimaisra91435 жыл бұрын
@@na-chan163 it's positive in phyics because we are describing the system's actions on it's surroundings, and it's negative in chemistry because the system is "throwing" out work (idk if im completely correct but im sure this is a good way to think of it)
@EngineeringStudyMaterials6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this video. Well Explained. It Helps me a lot.
@ziadyasser88883 жыл бұрын
man... u r the best one explain this .........so thank u
@N3thStudios4 жыл бұрын
Thankyou Professor
@Unknown_Ooh4 жыл бұрын
I think I'm dropping thermodynamics
@Traewing Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@cephasdn6576 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@bhumikaulangwar9056 Жыл бұрын
Good one 😂
@LawsonHanson20010 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@NoriousKumwenda7 ай бұрын
😩😩😅😅😅😅
@benYaakov3 жыл бұрын
IUPAC said that work done by the system is negative and vice versa
@baurzhanhydros99579 ай бұрын
expansion of the gas W < 0 and compression of the gas W > 0. Because in the first case, the system does work on the surroundings so it loses work while in the second case, the surroundings does work on the system so the latter gains works which will be positive
@BOLYANA Жыл бұрын
3:49 isn’t if the work done by the system then it is negative?
@MohanySoliman4 жыл бұрын
Good
@tkub7711 ай бұрын
Great video! This helped me a lot!
@TheMultipower477 жыл бұрын
I wish your channel was bigger
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
me too, friend!
@Lioooooooo1ooo7oooo4 жыл бұрын
It is now
@unknown-gy8jz4 жыл бұрын
Now it's bigger than ever!!!
@eyerus-uw7gt4 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains that's amazing and could you explain why U become zero when temeperature is constant plz ?
@HarshaAbey5 жыл бұрын
thank you
@prishaendait86214 ай бұрын
Everyone wathing this video please do note that the sign convention used here is only valid for physics, it is the opposite for chemistry.
@makeitmemorable__ Жыл бұрын
Sir you have done wrong here about sign convention work done by the system is negative and work done on the system is positive
@ProfessorDaveExplains Жыл бұрын
That's chemistry. This is a physics tutorial.
@makeitmemorable__ Жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains okh sir my mistake actually I am in 11th class and a neet aspirant so I don't know it well and thankyou for replying
@Mohith11112 ай бұрын
@@makeitmemorable__ lol same
@hja91572 жыл бұрын
Love to hear more from you
@captainldd5 жыл бұрын
I loved this video. so much good information!
@Ali-cc3zz4 жыл бұрын
بارك الله فيك... God bless you
@muftiaaishasuhail30504 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir! You made it easy
@muhamadabubakar76216 жыл бұрын
Sir your way of explaining topic in detail is the #best.....
@LarryWater7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much!
@ahmedelshazly4139 Жыл бұрын
awesome, great job professor . keep on
@ViaDenglas-xz4th9 ай бұрын
THANK YOU PROF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@crescencelee51123 жыл бұрын
short and easy to understand thanks
@bjalle35693 жыл бұрын
Nice video Dave, really helped me and my buddy Johan learn thermodynamics :)
@kripashankarshukla40736 жыл бұрын
You deserve to be a noble prize winner. Sir you are awesome you should get a noble prize!!!!!
@abdurrakib5513 жыл бұрын
very good expression sir!
@niceguy48013 жыл бұрын
Thakyou professor dave!
@sadhanajoseph23206 ай бұрын
thank you sir.
@jacobthonkuotamol49273 жыл бұрын
I don't think there is someone like Professor Dave on the planet Earth. I am just waiting for your inventions or discoveries my Professor.
@WritersDigest-b8f11 ай бұрын
Professor Dave: could u do YT thermodynamics videos with examples of processes from IC engine, jet engines, rockets, compressors, gas turbines, steam turbines, boilers, refrigeration cycle, heat pumps. Thermodynamics concepts would stick to comprehension and memory by using heat engines as examples. This video was fantastic and not easy to forget now because u used mechanical examples. Thank u so much
@B-MAN955 жыл бұрын
I'm really impressed , the way of teaching, how u remember all those things, can u give me any tips to remember easily
@rachellicari59643 жыл бұрын
***My chemistry teacher has told me +w=work done on system, -w=work done by system
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
Different disciplines will prefer different sign conventions. I'm accustomed to the heat engine sign convention, where work done by the system is positive.
@manishkanna5326 жыл бұрын
superb nd simple xplanation
@sajukgeorge33996 жыл бұрын
thankyou sir, it is very useful for me
@ashensaranguhewa5 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@johnrayrivas13756 жыл бұрын
Great explanation... Thanks
@leunam1leunam1723 жыл бұрын
Very great video
@dimitrideville75142 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@ramb00777 жыл бұрын
thank you very much and wish you good future
@mahiyarahman50993 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot🌼 Amazing!
@siddhantgupta35004 жыл бұрын
Thanks dave
@jerichoytprem45272 жыл бұрын
Wow. Thank You
@physics202463 жыл бұрын
Exordinary, congratulations, Sir
@miniaturenature25074 жыл бұрын
Amazing sir 👌 Wish you have more successful in life
@ayesha45994 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave is amazing, honestly!
@mohanraj-rw9du6 жыл бұрын
Good explanation
@333_studios7 жыл бұрын
Why does my textbook say deltaU= Q + W ?
@mufakkirhussain28166 жыл бұрын
333 Studios cuz you are Indian. You consider work done by the system +.
@TheMWBooher6 жыл бұрын
Engineers and Chemists view work differently. As he explains, Work is positive if the contained volume does Work against the atmosphere, like the expansion of a gas in a piston assembly. Chemists view Work as positive if the environment does work on the contained volume, such as a compression of the gas.
@Amityadav99.6 жыл бұрын
Mufakkir Hussain it is in physics but in chemistry this sign is reverse of W
@v2sisters1386 жыл бұрын
Wrong, because he is studying chemistry, and you are studying physics.
@ranjeetsohanpal7526 жыл бұрын
Even my textbook is saying work done on the system positive
@RANJANKUMAR-oj4wm5 жыл бұрын
Nice work
@icelerez3 жыл бұрын
This is a great video! i just wish you wouldn't have used capital letters when referring to heat and work because they aren't state functions and should be lower case. Anyways thank you for helping a whole generation of students through college.
@nokitosembrano36573 жыл бұрын
how about isobaric
@eshaan25005 жыл бұрын
Mr. Dave, you are awesome
@karthikswaminarayan42786 жыл бұрын
please make a video on carnot engine or carnot cycle
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
that would be the second law, the one right after this!
@karishmakaushik94913 жыл бұрын
Thankyou!
@ayushijain86716 жыл бұрын
Excellent for revision, short and crisp, covers all points quite well. Thanks a bunch. I also love your organic chemistry and dna-rna videos.
@manoharapproach71782 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, but am confusing a bit . If work done by the system that mean system loss energy to surroundings which decreases the internal energy of the system , so it should be negative. Please need more explanation
@evelyntromp7892 жыл бұрын
I’m obviously not Prof Dave but I think it’s positive because the equation has a negative W, whereas most equations have a positive work (dU = Q + W)
@ilhamnaim954110 ай бұрын
i love your content. pliss don't die❤❤❤
@AyatMohammed-y1h3 жыл бұрын
thank you now i understanding therom esay.
@mostafaelsheikh6046 жыл бұрын
thanks much❤❤🌹
@shadowx54433 жыл бұрын
Thks sr you're legend 😎⚡
@amlansasmal4 жыл бұрын
you are awesome sir i was unable to understand this topic...again again.... but your way is very simple and very useful to me.... keep on sir...that has a positive effect on us...😀
@EnricoMicheli-jo6bg3 жыл бұрын
Anyone else got exam today GL Guys also Professor Dave u a life savour
@aneeshaperera6680 Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir.we are hoping to a vedio on minerals .
@Ice-yp4wg3 жыл бұрын
Question: Why must heat be represented by "Q" and internal energy is to be represented by "Delta U"?
@poorleatherwallet3 жыл бұрын
delta U means the overall change in internal energy. delta U= U2 - U1
@Ice-yp4wg3 жыл бұрын
@@poorleatherwallet but why use U specifically?
@poorleatherwallet3 жыл бұрын
@@Ice-yp4wg wdym? Specific internal energy? Sometimes questions want u to find out the internal energy of the system before it went under compression or expansion process
@Ice-yp4wg3 жыл бұрын
@@poorleatherwallet The letter U I mean
@poorleatherwallet3 жыл бұрын
@@Ice-yp4wg no idea. But I guess it's because it's a good letter to use since other letters are used to define other properties such as temperature, pressure or enthalpy
@devi.official232 жыл бұрын
Tq very useful
@shahxad65333 жыл бұрын
why was (150J) taken positive ??? In the Last Example.?
@fexofenadinaGenerica7 жыл бұрын
Awesome tutorial.
@ZemedTekle28 күн бұрын
Please done the material balance calculation of chemical engineering
@guledchemist82647 жыл бұрын
good explanation sir
@nourhannenagy76662 жыл бұрын
When work is done by the system W is negative when work is done on the system w is positive
@nourhannenagy76662 жыл бұрын
You said the opposite
@ProfessorDaveExplains2 жыл бұрын
Chemistry and physics have opposite conventions. This is a physics tutorial.
@Endless201622 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains ahh so that's why
@parpeez11 ай бұрын
This is a really clear video buddy!
@devnaathpillai Жыл бұрын
Isnt work negative when it is performed by the system or am i trippin?