The Future Of U.S. Gun Reform After Uvalde And Buffalo

[@theduke7539]

Uvalde should have taught you 1 lesson. the Police can be trained but they cannot teach bravery, and theres no garuntee that the police will come to save you

[@ak-488]

The HUMAN did the killing, remove the gun and he will use the car, knife, pipe bomb, explosives, etc. Its the Humans, and not necessarily the" mentally ill" as so easily put but any human who has decided there is nothing left to live for, which our society is at fault. Bullying being one.

[@SI29222]

Fascinating how they harp on rifles so much when handguns are responsible for more deaths by far. Just fascinating.

[@jeffc1347]

Like it says in the video, most of the deaths with handguns are either suicide or gang related shootings, whereas with assault rifles are used to carry out mass killing events.

[@toptieramongus6730]

Well gun control isnt the answer, look at our society, if everything is acceptable you're going to have people taking things and looking at them from a prospective where they think that murder, genocide, suicide and other violent things of that nature are what we need to fix things in society, everyone sees the world as broken of course your going to have people who view other people as subhuman and want to enact violence against people that they personally blame, and when that happens that group of undesirables grows infinitely larger until even the kind old lady next door is lumped in so maybe it's not guns or mental illness, maybe it's the way we live and the way the world is run

[@AngelloDelNorte]

@@jeffc1347 2nd amendment though so if thugs can have guns then decent ppl can have fully automatic weapons to protect themselves.

[@bobhuman8343]

@@jeffc1347 back in the day, people used to be able to mail order these rifles without proving proof of permanent residence, age, ID, etc. And yet we had zero of these events. What’s changed since then?

[@enricokianaldo8116]

Well considering that the cases that led to the push of new legislations were carried out with rifles......it would be logical for them to harp on rifles

[@Tyler_Durden_562]

if gun manufacturers should "pay for the damage their products cause".....then auto manufacturers should have to pay for all damages that their vehicles due when car crashes occur due to reckless drivers and/or when people decide to use their Ford to plow through a crowd of people. Fair Is Fair, RIGHT?!

[@springerworks002]

I also think pharmaceutical companies should pay for any adverse side effects.

[@jonathantaylor6926]

Especially the bone stock 900HP cars like the Dodge hellcat.. if gun makers are reckless than so is nearly 1000HP on the street.

[@drgoutbreak7934]

@@jonathantaylor6926 its not the cars power that makes it dangerous its idiots who think they are good drivers

[@EON314]

@@drgoutbreak7934 You could say the same thing with a gun

[@drgoutbreak7934]

@@EON314 absolutely we dont blame cars for idiots behind the wheel so why do we blame guns

[@Bruhlifting]

Semi-Automatic DOESN’T mean “shoot faster” it means one shot=one trigger pull.

[@isaac3055]

I know only 1:40 into the video and already spreading misinformation.

[@isaac3055]

@The People yeah bolt action pistols is what we need.

[@kawaylao2956]

@@isaac3055 he very clearly said or

[@henrykwieniawski7233]

@The People No “fast trigger finger” can get close to automatic. Are you talking about bump firing?

[@secretsquirrel6718]

@The People why would you say that? The crooks and weirdos won't follow the rules. So why should the law abiding be forced into being crininals?

[@ericverster4069]

Also in response to "the tobacco industry has had to pay liabilities" concept. The tobacco industry lied about what it did to your health. The firearms industry never says "shooting yourself and other people is recommended by doctors".

[@bazle64]

We whites have the right to defend America

[@tgworks5791]

For sure, gun manuals literally say could cause death to u or others.

[@khankrum1]

One thing for certai Eris. I would sooner have a gun and not need it rather than need a gun and not have one.

[@Nikowalker007]

Gun manuals always say misuse can cause serious injury or death

[@jimm2077]

Shame the "good guys" arrived at Uvalde and did nothing, meanwhile a "bad guy" stopped the mall incident in less than 15 seconds.

[@mancavestudios8955]

How many people died in the Indiana Mall shooting? The fact that the shooter was neutralized by a CCL holder is the best news to come out of an otherwise unwanted arrangement.

[@cinemantics231]

Uh huh and just how do all the mass shooting maniacs end up with high-powered weapons in the first place? Yeah, let's do absolutely nothing about that because it will violate that all-important second amendment.

[@jimm2077]

@@cinemantics231 correct it would. shall not is clear.

[@TheAmericanCatholic]

@@cinemantics231 calling a ar 15 highpowered is like calling a 169 hp Toyota Corolla powerful. It makes sense when you don’t know anything about guns or cars. The ar 15 .223 round has 1300 foot pounds of energy while the common deer hunting .243 has almost 2000 ft lbs ,12 gauge shotguns have 2300 ft lbs to up to 3000 ft lbs for the most powerful shotgun rounds. 30-06 and .308 have 2700-3000 ft lbs of energy. All these rounds arnt even considered “high powered” they are full powered because they are typical rounds. High powered are 300 Winchester magnum 3500+ ft lbs that are used for bears , moose and elk.

[@cinemantics231]

@@TheAmericanCatholic That must be why every military uses a 556 in some capacity. Just so we're clear, I like firearms too. But not at the expense of my community. Throwing self-serving arguments that deflect rather than resolve will get us nowhere. The simple issue is that people who shouldn't be able to get guns can with no issues whatsoever. While the police know how to deal with regular criminals, mentally unstable people with no criminal background will never come under their scanner. Stricter gun laws are the best way to ensure they never get their hands on guns.

[@GnosticAtheist]

We don't even have armed police in my country, but considering we have had our psychos here in Norway they are seen with firearms on occasion. If I lived in the US I would own an armory. The incompetence of law enforcement demands it.

[@harpsdesire4200]

What is the average Norwegian attitude towards gun ownership? I'm from the US (New Jersey) and we are a blue state but we still have guns. I myself have only shot handguns at an indoor range

[@GnosticAtheist]

@@harpsdesire4200 Its complicated. I live in a small rural fishing village and gun ownership is not uncommon for hunting. In cities its far less common but any person can get a gun license if they have gone trough license requirements and education (and obviously been screened for criminal history and mental health). Most families would not want a gun due to the risks of having one and guns are expensive and getting your license aint free either. Since the crime rate is low people dont really feel any need, I guess. But owning a shotgun for hunting and the like is not something anyone reacts to that I have heard. Also note that criminals avoid guns. If a gun is involved in a crime the chances you will get caught doubles as they throw much more on the investigation. Generally people are not out in the streets for or against guns.

[@virtuaguyverify]

Atleast you are smart enough to understand what's going on here in the US. There are too many wolves, not enough sheep dogs, just a bunch of sheep's.

[@shakazulu5819]

...as Trump, you know that guy, right?..Trump said why not get immigrants from Norway. Apparently, immigrants from Norway are whitier than snow once they step foot in America. If you are whitier than snow, America is for you. Own an armory and protect yourself from minorities. Laws in America will be in your favor

[@GnosticAtheist]

@@shakazulu5819 I did met a Frenchman that was milky white ones. Skin condition. Other than that people tend to be tan or red, depending. Skin coloration reflects genetic necessities set by generational and regional climate. I would never emigrate to the US as I have no reason to leave. The only countries I could consider are cold countries as I hate heat. This is not particularly racial as plenty of fellow citizen goes on holidays to warmer countries during midwinter, when the cold is most pleasing. Uh, what was the topic? Oh right, yes I would need an armory to protect myself from the state and the police. From my cold, dead hands I say! Was that right? As for "minorities", who are you referring to? If I look at the population numbers everyone is a minority in the US now. "Minority" is a statistical term. I have found that Americans often refer to non-white as minority but that would be incorrect as non-white is not a race, just as white and black are not races either, nor specific enough to denote a cultural type. Infact, the term "race" is rather incorrect as well. Racial science is pretty much irrelevant since all humans can breed with other "races". I guess we could use the term sub-race. Anywyas, Trump was a fun president, I had a lot of laughs from his antics. Must have been especially interesting having him as president.

[@khankrum1]

When I see how your law enforcement operates, i would want to be armed.

[@cooldudecs]

Liberals took the resource officers out of school

[@blindsr]

Law enforcement shouldn't be carrying deadly weapons either. There are far to many non lethal ways to disable someone putting a bullet in them just smacks of the wild wild west and we are long past that level of primitive behaviour. Or so I thought.

[@declan11ful]

@@blindsr never underestimate human stupidity

[@blindsr]

@@declan11ful No argument here on that.

[@WanderingExistence]

@@blindsr You know there are bears, mountain lions, and wolves in the US right? You gonna use a tazer when a 300lb bear is about to maul you? Or maybe you think some pepper spray will stop four guys from breaking and entering into your house. That's not even touching on the main reason it's in our most fundamental laws of the land, it's because this country was founded to get away from government authoritarianism.

[@diegoelvica]

When the reporter says "Semiautomatic rifles have a higher rate of fire and more capacity" you realize he's talking from absolute ignorance.

[@davis3138]

hahaha. If only we applied the "if you don't know anything about the topic, you don't get to legislate on it" rule equally.

[@ajohndaeal-asad6731]

Higher fire rate than Automatics??? lol nah, more capacity than pistols and other weapons... maybe? but that more so depends on the magazine. But I do support the push to take more precautions for acquiring weapons than just anyone can walk in the store with cash to buy one. If one needs a license to fish, I think it's reasonable to have some barriers of entry. I know most criminals would ignore it, but it's about making it harder for them to get guns

[@pabl0sauced0]

@@ajohndaeal-asad6731 most of these mass shootings aren't committed by criminals. They're caused by "normal" people who snap, this whole talk about keeping it out of gangbanger's hands seems to completely ignore the countless murders done by regular suburban folk

[@MrSoulstealer1]

@@davis3138 couldnt agree more!!!

[@ericquintero7099]

No, he is saying that they have a higher rate of fire and more capacity relative to when our country was founded (1776). Which means either you are an absolute moron since you completely ignored (or didn’t comprehend the context) or you are just arguing in bad faith. By the way, Thomas Jefferson recommended that we re-write the constitution every 20 years (or every generation) because he believed one generation could not speak for the next. According to Jefferson we should have shredded the constitution and re-rewritten it over 220 years ago. Honestly, I don’t think our founding fathers imagined a world where teenagers go around mass killing elementary school kids in school. Nor, do I think they would stand by and just let it happen because “tHe RiGhT t0 BeAR aRmS sHaLL noT bE iNfRiNgEd.” At some point reason has to enter the equation.

[@shookfng]

If gun owners should have liability insurance, so should the police!!!

[@bfish9700]

They do, it's called sovereign immunity.

[@ad636051]

It's mind boggling how people can justify banning certain guns because they think the constitution only applies to muskets, that holds the same weight as saying the first amendment doesn't apply to the internet because the founding fathers didn't know the internet would exist.......

[@seafarer8039]

The second amendment is clearly out of date and not necessary in any developed state, nowhere else in the developed world do people feel the need to bear arms. What makes Americans so special?

[@ad636051]

@@seafarer8039 the second amendment is very much relevant today as it was over 200 years ago. We're see the core principal of the second amendment play out in Ukraine where their government abolished all gun laws overnight and started handing out machine guns to everyone on the streets for the people to fight back for the goal of common defense of the free state of Ukraine. Our second amendment is to protect us from domestic and foreign tyrannical governments. Our world is only growing more volatile by the year so our second amendment will also become more important.

[@Nikkk6969]

What’s even more mind boggling is people think the government is trying to carry this out to “help”

[@linusmlgtips2123]

At the time, the 2nd amendment almost exclusively applied to single shot weaponry.

[@ad636051]

@@linusmlgtips2123 That's incorrect because people also had 8 shot revolvers in the mid 16th century in Europe. In the mid 18th century before the constitution was written people had 10 shot harmonica guns and we also had repeating shot firearms such as the Kalthoff repeater that was released around 1630 with a magazine capacity ranging from (depending on the design) 5 to 30 rounds (some using this design had a 50 round magazine) which can shoot at a rate of up to 60 rounds per minute. There's also the Girandoni air rifle created in 1779 and used by the Australian army and also in the Lewis and Clark Expedition, technically this is not a firearm due to it being an air gun however it is just as lethal as a firearm within 120 yards, this air gun had a 22 round magazine that can be fired entirely within 20 seconds. Our founding fathers were well aware of multiple repeating shot firearms available at that time and would've explicitly stated single shot in the second amendment if they intended for it to apply exclusively to the musket.

[@carguy3028]

It’s worth nothing that in the 1950s you could order a semiautomatic rifle from a catalog and have it shipped to your door. They had 25 to 30 round magazines and were just as effective as a modern ar15. No background check or anything, we didn’t have the problems with shootings that we do today. Something has changed since then and it isn’t the easy access to guns. Guns are harder to get today than they were then and we have more shootings. There doesn’t seem to be any interest in getting to the root cause, everyone has an agenda and they push that agenda over looking for real solutions. I would be interested in real solutions not something agenda driven.

[@SalvadorSTMZ]

in the 1950s people would rob banks with rifles and get away with it

[@JCElzinga]

absolutely. you could order an m1 carbine and shoot up a school with a rate of fire as fast as you can pull the trigger... but it almost never happened.

[@cscarlton24]

Wrong, the caliber AR15s shoot wasn’t even in use in the 1950s. Nice try

[@carguy3028]

@@cscarlton24 I was referring to a 30 caliber carbine which was in use at the time, was semiautomatic with detachable magazines and is powerful enough for the job. The ar15 is slightly more powerful than the 30 caliber carbine but less powerful than a 308 or a 30-06. Notice I never said ar15 I said semiautomatic rifle, the 30 caliber carbine is probably the most popular at the time due to price but there were others and if you want to get technical you could order an ar15 in the mid 1960s up to 1968 and have it shipped to your door.

[@fosterslover]

@@carguy3028 America has always had insane gun violence. Information and violence just spreads more quickly in the modern world. The gun lobby is too big in this country, so we're content to let a few dozen children get gunned down at school every year so long as people keep buying guns.

[@NoelDSmith]

if the police hadn't been in the way, we might have saved some of those kids. instead they did exactly as the anti-gun lobby told them to.

[@brucecampbell4528]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

[@WalkWalkWalk-c2y]

Yes, a well regulated militia lol

[@WalkWalkWalk-c2y]

@C K so that militia part was just a throwaway? In any event, even if we went with your interpretation it still requires answering if there is an absolute right to bring any “arm” that you can “bear” anywhere? Can you take an AR-15 onto a plane? Can students bring weapons into their school? If your answer isn’t yes then it appears that you’re allowing for some degree of infringement, no? Either way, this whole debate is boring. Guns aren’t going anywhere and, as a result, the US will remain a uniquely violent place (5x’s the homicide rate as the European Union, for example).

[@WalkWalkWalk-c2y]

@C K planes, as well? Literally everywhere? And, sure, what could go wrong if everyone at school were walking around with AR-15s 😂? It’s just beyond parody at this point - if guns kept us safe then the US would be the safest place on earth, but, instead, it’s significantly more dangerous than other developed countries. Again, I ask for fun because I have the luxury of not having to deal with the consequences of this silliness.

[@WalkWalkWalk-c2y]

@C K yet, far fewer shootings (and homicides in general) happen in places where guns aren’t as prevalent as candy. What gives? Somehow, France, a country with twice as many people as Texas, had half as many homicides. I wonder why? Speaking of which, did you see that parade celebrating our “freedom” and independence interrupted by gunfire. If only they had been busy protecting themselves rather than marching!

[@ratofvengence]

@C K "Except shootings also don't happen in European countries with high gun ownership rates, proving that guns aren't the issue." It proves nothing of the sort. What it proves is tighter gun laws are largely effective at keeping guns out of the wrong hands. EVERY other 1st world nation has tighter gun laws, and EVERY other 1st world nation has a FRACTION the US homicide rate. Just to give that some more context, the US has a worse rate than Mozambique and Kazakhstan...

[@lancelittleton9802]

"Give up your firearms, you can count on the police to be there when seconds matter!" Said no-one with a brain ever.

[@WalkWalkWalk-c2y]

“Give everyone a gun, you will be safer” - said often in the most violent country in the developed world.

[@Lenevor]

Fun fact: us isnt the most violent country what tf are you on

[@WalkWalkWalk-c2y]

@@Lenevor which developed country has a higher violent crime rate than America? The EU has a 1/5th the homicide rate, Canada and Australia are lower, as is the UK’s, and Japan. If you want to tell me that El Salvador has a higher rate then, yeah, sure, that’s true enough.

[@Lenevor]

@@WalkWalkWalk-c2y Not too sure why you would include Japan considering its no where near the EU, but I thought Sweden has higher crime than us, no?

[@WalkWalkWalk-c2y]

@@Lenevor it’s included because it’s a developed country. As for Sweden, their homicide rate is about 1.2 per 100k people - ours is 4.96.

[@TheBuffNerd92]

The deadliest mass shooting in history was done with two handguns. Rifles aren't the problem, people are.

[@0Idskuul]

Very much not true

[@Wheres_Walle]

"Shall not be infringed"

[@murrproductions9654]

They've infringed upon just about every right in the constitution possible for years. They regulate and create new legislation on them every year. This country no longer stands by the constitution anymore. Just a sea of road pirates and politicians attempting to profit off from infringement of amendments.

[@stopthe9002]

We are taking your guns buckle up buckoooooo

[@aetvrna]

"Under no pretext"

[@PigRipperLAW]

ACAB

[@tookitogo]

“A well-regulated militia”. One person is not a well regulated militia.

[@timstanford995]

As an Australian immigrant to Oklahoma I can only warn you that gun control has destroyed my country. I suffer not my country to face the same fate!

[@indigenous31617]

Thanks for sharing, Tim.

[@timstanford995]

@@indigenous31617 You're welcome

[@ratofvengence]

Rubbish Timmy. Australia outranks the US in EVERY freedom index, and outranks in quality of life. Oh, we have less than 1/7th the homicide rate and our kids come home alive from school. Destroyed? Lolz.

[@matthewmorel3758]

It’s nice to see Australian with a brain.

[@timstanford995]

@@ratofvengence I know a solution. Ban public schools? Oh, and guess what? America would have a low homocide rate if we removed Memphis, Chicago, LA, St. Louis and DC

[@eatass8799]

The second Amendment is your right

[@hydrobuu]

7:48 funny how she blames legally gun owners, but not the ones that are carrying illegally.

[@Mas3452001]

People act like these guns were invented 10 to 20 yrs ago. They weren’t so the only thing that’s changed is how insane these people have gotten which is likely tied to how much screen time and what’s on their screens

[@bigshotaviation8570]

People in Europe do the same amount of screen time as us Americans if not more? Screen time is not what is driving people insane.

[@AndroidJackson]

And antidepressant usage. Shootings and SSRIs started in the 80s

[@jacobzindel987]

@@AndroidJackson very good point.

[@SweBeach2023]

@@bigshotaviation8570 True, but maybe a stronger feeling of community would prevent many shootings. But urbanisation, mass migration, loss of earning capacity for large groups and plenty of screen time have turned us all into individuals with no clear connection to our fellow man.

[@mobilusinmobili8321]

@@bigshotaviation8570 Demographics is why Europeans can own guns and not be like Central and South America, Middle East, Africa, etc Its not the guns.

[@hailrider8188]

"Which means they have a higher rate of fire" referring to semi automatic rifles. SUCH A LIE. A semi automatic rifle has the same rate of fire as a common semi automatic hand gun. THIS VIDEO IS DISHONEST.

[@ad636051]

Welcome to the leftist propaganda machine called the media...

[@changye9604]

Yeah doesn't make much sense you fire as fast as you can pull...

[@wastool]

Theoretically a revolver can have a high rate of fire, since the action is manually cycled.

[@darenmiller2218]

They usually are.

[@linusmlgtips2123]

they have an average higher fire rate per round because they can carry more ammunition per magazine

[@aslau3820]

I don’t carry a gun and don’t advocate everyone doing so, but the big question that has risen after every mass gun event is that in every situation law enforcement was never designed to prevent mass shootings. Law enforcement comes to prevent worse carnage, stop the bad actor(s), and to conduct investigations. How or who is supposed to protect children and citizens in the first 10-15 minutes before law enforcement gets there?

[@spencertullis4297]

LE was there THREE minutes after the gunman arrived.

[@chasemer6]

Simple: a well-regulated militia

[@gloriathomas3245]

You don't think so? After being held at gunpoint in a robbery that alone made me very pro-gun despite not owning a gun.

[@reginageorge8802]

Nothing will solve anything America is cursed by the terror America has done to the world god is punishing America

[@noneshere]

Chaseme....The Right Of The PEOPLE Shall Not Be Infringed. Its doesn't say " the right of the militia" anywhere in the constitution

[@jakelopes2789]

This shooting proved police won't help you protect your family

[@davidw64us1964]

Armed Guards for Me Not for Thee

[@ricoswartz345]

I love watching gun control propaganda try and try but ultimately fail 😂 The tears of gun control advocates always bring a laugh too! 😁

[@tyf.4399]

Semi-automatic rifles have a higher rate of fire? 99% of guns are semiautomatic? What are you comparing them to? There are also 30+ round magazines for handguns. This idea that rifles are the problem is just unfathomable to me. Most mass shootings are done by handguns. And these people have no idea what any of that even means.

[@pineapplesideways3820]

Handguns and semi-automatic weopons banned and bring back the guns when the 2nd amendment was written flintlocks

[@Dirty_Bear22]

@@pineapplesideways3820 SCOTUS acknowledged that the second amendment protects guns made after the 18th century….

[@pineapplesideways3820]

@@Dirty_Bear22 who I'm glad he ain't in mine country

[@Dirty_Bear22]

@@pineapplesideways3820 What?

[@pineapplesideways3820]

@D.R an in year 2022 its not needed, usa is famous for massacres

[@G43X]

2A For All. I will continue to donate to gun lobbies and promote gun ownership.

[@suns1457]

Sheep

[@AndroidJackson]

@@suns1457 tyrant

[@G43X]

@@suns1457 guns are good

[@TheRealFollower]

It's impossible to prevent evil without treating everyone as a criminal.

[@Aarongoscinski]

Here’s the problem that people don’t understand. When you have a mentally unstable person that gets their hands on a high capacity weapon of war, it gives them the confidence to go and commit these heinous crimes. Quoting Nikolas Cruz, the parkland shooter of 2018: “once you all feel the wrath of my AR, then you will know who I am”. Do you think these kids would have the confidence to storm a school with a revolver? No. Gun reform is not a recommendation, it needs to end.

[@davidtangitau3771]

The bigger issue is mental health. Everyone seems to forget we’re the most drugged out nation in the world as well.

[@firstlast8258]

Speak for yourself

[@davidtangitau3771]

@@firstlast8258 But I’m not, I’m speaking of rampant drug abuse, both illicit and prescription drugs. You haven’t heard of the opioid epidemic sweeping the US?. I see it every day.

[@Racko.]

It's not mental health, its HATE, call it what it really is

[@nokiot9]

It’s mental health, it’s fatherless homes, it’s the education system, it’s a multi pronged issue that has complex elements to it. You can’t just lay it at the feet of one thing. It’s why none of the solutions we have seem to be working.

[@Racko.]

@@VSOP300blkout And believe anything they see on facebook

[@gogameing5657]

The argument that in a room with fourth graders and it doesn't matter what gun it is a 22 is going to do a lot less damage than AK-47 or a assault rifle

[@andrewwarwick1305]

I think the point is that when you have hours to do what you like to your victims even less effective weapons such as a 22, or your grandad’s shotgun, are plenty deadly enough to cause carnage in a classroom. The cops should have gone in much quicker. And yes a 22 or a shotgun is perfectly capable of killing you. Don’t listen to sleepy Joe he knows nothing about firearms.

[@drgoutbreak7934]

Why did you mention a ak and a assault rifle are you referring to to a AR15

[@SubvertTheState]

I love how they try to terrify the public ALL OF THE TIME. "This decision has made all of us less safe". He says that like it's true. It's not. And they keep making up "loopholes" that are in fact, just gun rights. These people don't understand the law and are trying to legislate using emotions. Sueing manufacturers for criminal's illegal use? Come on now.

[@rjpg]

Agree. Its like a car, unless its defective, then people shouldn't be allowed to sue.

[@vinn7944]

I'm glad you love that.

[@bfish9700]

Yes, people that go through a legal process to literally obey draconian laws make society less safe. I'm sure no gang members ever concealed carried illegally. *eye roll*

[@SasukeUchiha-zu6dw]

Per DC vs Heller weapons that are common and used for lawful purpose (such as AR-15) are protected.

[@WalkWalkWalk-c2y]

What’s common evolves. Maybe in a few decades we’ll all have Javelins and stingers in our house. Plus, let’s not pretend otherwise, these SCOTUS decisions (like all constitutional law) are simply pulled out of their asses.

[@mrskywalker6114]

That's like suing the company that made the knife that was used in a murder..... it's not gonna solve anything except make guns more unaccessible for good law abiding citizens. These rich politicians don't need guns because they have body gaurds with automatic assault rifles protecting them. But what do the poor have?

[@natama3483]

How you differentiate good abiding citizen with mass shooting gun user, every body have the same easy access to buy gun, wake up america u already have 300 mas shooting just by 2022, restrict it, or atleast make a strict licensing system duhhh.....

[@mrskywalker6114]

@@natama3483 the laws are already in place. Most of the time, the government is already aware of risky mentally ill people, but the reason the shootings occur is because of the governments laziness to be proactive to stop the shootings before it happens. Why do you think there is literally 0 bank heists nowadays? Because if the rich were being affected, they would pool money into the proper communities to prevent such things from occurring.

[@SalvadorSTMZ]

Why does a good law abiding citizen need an AR15?

[@mrskywalker6114]

@@SalvadorSTMZ to protect yourself, protect your family, protect your property, you cant always rely on the police, you can hunt with it, prevents genococide, keeps the government from going corrupt etc. The list goes on

[@joshyazg2120]

@@SalvadorSTMZ Because a criminal is going to own whatever they want and there is no sense putting the law abiding people at a disadvantage.

[@Undertaker93]

If you die in a shooting that's your fault Wrong place Wrong time

[@dohminkonoha3200]

There is no wonder that people want to defend themselves from aggression. Gun is a very dangerous tool but only tool to keep you safe in this terrible situation.

[@VB6000.]

Don't be caught empty-handed when your life and well-being is on the line. Be armed, be ready. Police are several minutes away.

[@SasukeUchiha-zu6dw]

And then another hour to rush in

[@ryka3]

Man you Americans astonish me every time. Some fights are better not to take, but to each their own.

[@corbindallas5710]

And they will cower in fear outside instead of rushing in to save children from being murdered.

[@Dontunderstandpleasesayagian]

@@ryka3 sorry i know me and you cool but you can just not fight a gun you can’t walk or run away

[@andrewnorris7642]

@@ryka3 some fights you don't get to choose

[@brian2964]

Unified Messaging: Correct the following Gun Safety -> Gun Control --> Citizen Disarmament Assault Weapons -> Defense Weapons High Capacity -> Standard Capacity Don't let them win the war of words, Culture is upstream of politics

[@brian2964]

@@shooting4star2023 Humans are going to Human

[@beyondalldreams]

what's your point ?

[@A_Legal_Immigrant_1776]

Criminals don't care about your silly "laws" ...

[@ryka3]

so lets remove all of them anyway for more FREEDOM

[@abtrevino7589]

Not worried about reform in TEXAS here in Texas we protect and will at any cost for our family even from tyrants

[@ak-488]

Amen, but no matter where you live it is the duty of the armed civilian to stop any and all aggression against freedom and if bloodshed becomes necessary do your duty like those who did it for us in the REVOLUTIONARY WAR. Have the gear if you can.

[@greekfire1875]

6:10 "...Constant gains over the last few years..." *shows a chart displaying underperforming stocks*

[@isaac3055]

Ikr even shitcoin charts look better

[@sonofkarma5461]

I don’t want this to happen (sure these tragedies are awful) but there are lots of Law abiding people who will need them at times

[@loturzelrestaurant]

The Systems f----d, so the best thing we can all do is learn how and why it is the way it iss. 'Some More News' just made a video about Sheriffs and also Unions that tell us an awful-lot, and thats not even mentioning the always-issue-adressing Guy named Second Thought.

[@54032Zepol]

And what healthcare reform will the u.s. use to combat mental health??

[@frostman9661]

Maybe bring this up with your republican law maker who refuses every effort to reform healthcare...

[@Foagal1775]

Can't assist with mental health when it will bankrupt those seek that help :(

[@noneshere]

Same as they've always used : Pri$on

[@LeeeroyJenkins]

They shut down hundreds of government run mental hospitals in the 70's and most of them are collecting dust and haven't even been demolished.

[@phoenixblanco3892]

@@frostman9661 Do they refuse the effort to reform healthcare or do they block the 100 other motions that are always riding on the same bill

[@jameshenryarchbold5061]

10 RINO's ...shame shame "shall not be infringed"

[@HeyYoFabels]

10 republicans with a brain

[@AndroidJackson]

@@HeyYoFabels that won’t get re-elected because they violated their oath

[@AdamSmith-gs2dv]

Hopefully 10 former RINOs soon. Their primary opponents should just run the fact they voted for this bill over and over again

[@HeyYoFabels]

@@AdamSmith-gs2dv So 10 future democrat seats? lol

[@matthewmorel3758]

@@HeyYoFabels nah. 10 more republicans who defend the second amendment.

[@spartendeath]

Guns and America goes hand in hand, one simply cannot exist without the other.

[@KattalystFr]

Then America should not exist and I hope it doesn't soon enough. We need the English to colonize us again.

[@_gungrave_6802]

That is only true culturally but in reality the US would be perfectly fine without guns.

[@Anonymous_Lee19]

It is probably IMPOSSIBLE for Americans to imagine a country where citizens are not allowed to own firearms... They will just need to live with the consequences...

[@andrewnorris7642]

@@_gungrave_6802 we'll only be subject fully to the oligarchs who already have an iron grip on all our balls, but no dead ankle biters right

[@SCIXFI]

We need more armed citizens, it works talk bout that…

[@CrannTV]

It’s a good idea to do this. Unarm citizens and let criminals be the only ones armed besides the government. What could possibly go wrong

[@randomxm-1875]

did you know in 1935 the german socialist party (or later known as the nazi party) took away all guns and the adolf education (as i call) / indoctrination

[@philroelants7564]

Recent shooting were NOT carried out by any firearm. They are carried out by an individual they used a rifle. Guns are inanimate objects that require a user to operate. Quit the propaganda, report the facts. That makes what your supposed to do

[@thetowerfantasymusic]

But now, hypothetically, imagine no one had guns...

[@ryka3]

@@thetowerfantasymusic Dont make him imagine things. He has already set his worldview aint nobody gonna change it lol

[@eagle25311]

@@thetowerfantasymusic Yeah imagine if meth was illegal and nobody had it. LOL criminals will always have guns.

[@phoenixblanco3892]

@@thetowerfantasymusic If they didn't have guns they would go to a gas station, fill a gas canister up and throw it through a window somewhere. Crazy people don't become sane by making it illegal for them to have guns.

[@numenthehuman]

So many republicans going along with gun reform makes me extremely nervous.

[@arthurbutt8457]

18 to 20 year olds do vote and serve on jury's, but they can't buy cigarettes and they can't buy alcohol. Those were things that you could do in 2015 and 1984, respectively. So why exactly is raising the minimum age to 21 so bad. If it's because it goes against their constitutional right, then wouldn't the 18 age restriction be also? I'm not sure, but is there an age restriction in the 2nd amendment?

[@Scortd]

No, age isn't mentioned. The only thing the 2nd says is a person has the right to own a gun. Says nothing about the type of gun, age of person, or any regulation or restrictions being unabled to be applied. It mentions a well regulated militia which most 2A advocates arent part of and if you want to take every word at its most literal and unrestrictable form, shall not be infringed would mean you can't restrict felons, pychos, blind people, mentally unstable, children, or anyone in-between from owning a gun. Pretty sure that wasnt the ideal they had when they wrote the 2nd, so common since restrictions and mandatory training prior to purchase wouldn't be a violation of any one's rights.

[@eprabhat]

You seem to be one of the reason of mass killing Still will try once , a higher age limit may help to reduce immature behavior, and hope you understand it’s about life which is way different than other social situations & rights

[@khankrum1]

18 year olds can also be drafted to fight and die in wars, but they can not but alcohol

[@khankrum1]

The 2nd Amendment gives the right to be available with your own weapo s to serve in the millitia. Nothing about age.

[@JCElzinga]

honestly, your argument is a good one for lowering the age of buying alcohol and cigarettes.

[@christinepagsanhan1246]

The problem with ban on guns is you can ban from the country like Mexico but has it stopped the killings? NO. My heart goes out to the families😢

[@abhilekhhhh]

As an Indian I wish I could also have guns. That's the American dream man. You can't take away guns. What we need is more mental health initiatives.

[@royharper2003]

as an American I wish I could have an Indian woman.

[@abhilekhhhh]

@@royharper2003 they are great man. I think they're amongst the most intelligent women out there.

[@JCElzinga]

@@abhilekhhhh lol dont feed the troll. I dated an Indian girl.. she was great... her family.. good lord that was some drama hahaha.

[@abhilekhhhh]

@@JCElzinga man we Indians are not from an individualistic culture. Like an American father will act as an individual infront of their children but in India a father acts as an archetypal father and so on and so forth. We have large families, mostly. And women specifically love the drama. My mom talks hours a day with her sisters, sister in law's about each and everything related to family drama. And almost all housewives do that. 🤣

[@kateanderson8384]

When you make your presentation an hour before class starts

[@CutleryChips]

Lol 😂 this country has been talking about gun reforms since I was born 😂

[@daltonpipkin6707]

MENTAL HEALTH IS THE ISSUE. CNBC IS THE SECOND PROBLEM

[@Sykone4717]

Since you all don't need to get a license, pay a fee, spend 100 hours in training, have your colon checked, get a back ground check, get your fingers reduced in capacity to 5 total, lock up your electronic devices when you are not actively using them, prohibited from carrying your high speed internet connected black assaul phone in public, and have every single word you speak or type approved by the government, then you shouldn't need to do any of that to purchase, own, and carry a firearm. Your rights don't start where someone else decides they do. Your ability to exercise your right to free speech isn't restricted to stop you from doing criminal things with it, and neither should your ability to obtain and possess arms.

[@bobsthea]

that's why americans gun culture is a joke

[@Sykone4717]

@@shooting4star2023 Your opinion doesn't represent mine. You don't need free speech. The ability to express yourself freely is prohibited in most countries in this age, developed or not. The first amendment was established more than 200 years ago --must go--. There's a lot of blood on it.

[@phoenixblanco3892]

@@shooting4star2023 "owning a gun by average citizen is prohibited in most countries" Good, end the argument by moving. If most of the world caters to your opinions than get out.

[@0Idskuul]

Your right to free speech is regulated, and there are restrictions on freedom of speech. I don’t see why there cannot be regulations regarding guns kinda like idk the constitution says🤷‍♂️

[@Sykone4717]

@@0Idskuul The restrictions are civil for damages caused by your speech such as defamation. There are no restrictions to prevent one from accessing their ability to speak. No courses, no license, no fees, or examinations. You're making a false equivalence.

[@RodrigoOliveira-cc3kc]

Let's blame the car manufactures for the car accidents.

[@dubs3815]

Semi automatics have a higher rate of fire and have accepts larger mags” I didn’t even finish listening

[@UndiagnosedGarbage]

Banning more guns because the police will come and protect me like those in Uvalde? Hahahahahahahahahaha

[@AuggieTB]

The ones that commit crimes don't care what laws are in place. They clearly never have and they will do whatever is necessary to carry out their plans and see their goals through.

[@OPIXdotWORLD]

thats right...we call them " the government"...

[@A_Legal_Immigrant_1776]

exactly

[@COLT6940]

@@OPIXdotWORLD based bruh.

[@ryka3]

Obviously, laws are meant to be effective after something happen. If you want actual prevention then you dont get that in a "free society". Still just making guns so widely available is just ridiculuous. I mean sure there is plenty of people who actually need them due to living in remote areas and such, but those are the exeption rather then the norm.

[@HeyYoFabels]

weird how california doesnt have the gun crime texas and red states have

[@secretsquirrel6718]

Why cannot a felon own a gun or vote after they serve their time but the rest of the bill of rights is not interrupted?

[@sightlocs349]

This is what they’ve been wanting the whole time. Excuses ! Meanwhile no punishment for the criminals. Let me guess, what’s next ? Warrantless searches for all ?

[@ak-488]

Good ideas, bad ideas, a zillion opinions but we all damn well know that we will never take the guns out of the hands of the criminal and worse the human who has nothing left to live for..

[@ryanehlis426]

We have the 2nd amendment, shall not be infringed.

[@XOPOIIIO]

How many people die from guns and how many are killed by mothers before they even born?

[@sopek1427]

The Parkland Author argument is a joke

[@pavels5600]

Suing gun manufacturers would only make sense to the lawyers & plaintiffs who stand to profit off this. Go for the deepest pockets. Similar to suing cigarette makers 30 years ago. Can I sue a beer brewery for making me an alcoholic? Can I sue Dominos Pizza for making me fat? Can I sue a bank for giving me too much credit on my credit card? I got into debt so deep, I'm unable to pay down the balance to $0.

[@MadMarWalker1]

Going for the profits is a proven method to curtail activities as the SPLC did to the KKk

[@bananaboat1808]

Difference with cigarettes is that people smoked them not knowing the inherent danger, those lawsuits were justified. In regards to firearms, the danger of guns is very obvious to people and so if no laws are broken by the manufacturer they have no basis for being sued. They’re just trying to bankrupt gun companies so Americans will be less able to buy them.

[@HeyYoFabels]

no but you can sue a car manufacturer for faulty cars, you're so bad at analogies but thats ok, republicans arent generally that bright anyways

[@phoenixblanco3892]

@@MadMarWalker1 "Curtail activities" sounds a lot worse when these "activities" are basic human rights

[@murrproductions9654]

The sad thing is you could actually sue for all those things you've stated and most likely win the lawsuit. Dumber lawsuits have been won before.

[@4damula]

10 Republicans that's going to loose their seats.

[@JCElzinga]

lol, poles say republicans are going to absolutely destroy democrats this next election.

[@Tential1]

First it's your girlfriend can take your guns away. Next, it's your gf can force you to get a vasectomy(you already hear women saying this). She can already force you to pay child support at any time by leaving you, instead of default 50/50 custody (you know, equality? The thing they supposedly want). Then it's any woman can force a man to do whatever she wants. Ya, they want all of our rights. Not just guns.

[@noneshere]

Guns are not leaving America. Gun laws only teach society not to register weapons with government and spread them out with friends and family to prevent government from ever disarming us on this side of the prison walls.

[@OPIXdotWORLD]

taking your guns is to keep corrupt politicians etc safe...not u...

[@bpenaval2541]

You are delusional. There is no conspiracy to take away your masculinity.

[@ryka3]

Is that guy for real? Rights were given to man - but not for free but in exchange to taking responsibility.

[@mobilusinmobili8321]

@Stuck ‘n’ Stoned Your words are why its easy not to care about Roe vs Wade being overturned. Lol

[@DSAhmed]

You can't restrict legal adults 18-21 years of age???? hello? what about alcohol. You're not responsible enough to drink a beer, but you are responsible enough to own a gun?

[@durden.tyler537]

“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.” -Jeff Cooper

[@ryka3]

xD

[@samsaasen4922]

If you want gun safety go take a class

[@jamesmccloud3916]

I wonder if Ukraine citizens wish they had more guns when the Russians invaded

[@Blaze6432]

I wonder if Ukranians wish they had a larger military. There have been multiple flops throughout human history before gun of empires failing to invade. So by that logic, when we had no guns in the world nations should have been easy to invade.

[@xali2008]

armed civilians have no chance against trained militaries.

[@JCElzinga]

@@xali2008 tell that to afganistan and iraq. armed civilians can be very effective at gorilla warfare.

[@jonathanng138]

I wonder who could invade America in the first place lmao y'all surrounded by oceans

[@wilcowen6284]

That wouldn't really help against a military like russia

[@auro1986]

prices of guns will reduce in future and sales will increase. if not what news will cnbc show? local veteran inaugurating public toilets?

[@monanoorch8699]

?

[@54032Zepol]

Why are 18 years old allowed to have guns but not cigarettes??

[@reginageorge8802]

Because America is lunatic laughing stock

[@noneshere]

Because you can join the military at 18

[@chasemer6]

I agree, one of the worst enactments of Trump that went largely ignored was the federal age increase on tobacco products from 18 to 21.

[@LeeeroyJenkins]

If they try to move the gun age to 21 it will make people want to change the military age to 21. So now you are going against the gun industry and the military industrial complex.

[@rjpg]

Its a right, same voting at 18.

[@rebelgames7699]

You don’t need to get rid of guns you guys need to get rid of suicidal teens

[@tkchikondo]

You can buy a gun at 18 but aren’t allowed to drink till 21. Great logic 😂😂

[@JCElzinga]

true, you should be able to buy a drink at 18.

[@MellyP1]

Great argument, we should lower the drinking age

[@jonathantaylor6926]

So I can't buy a gun because some nut job that should have been locked away in a psych ward years ago was ignored by everyone around him?

[@richardsalley9848]

Any gun law that ever passes will always only hurt the law abiding citizens, and not the criminals or a corrupt government. It's very important to always remember why the 2nd amendment was made to begin with...and that is for self defense against crime and a corrupt government. Take way semi and automatic weapons...Okay, well the criminals and the government will still have these weapons, and they'll always be better armed than the law abiding citizens.

[@Rei-xq6yl]

then instead of giving the law abiding people guns to fight back. maybe try the other way around by removing those problems before these thing can happen. why does almost every country have a no gun law or strict gun law never or one in a blue moon mass shooting incident? those country too have crime and corrupt goverment and yet why is America suffering from frequent mass shooting?

[@richardsalley9848]

@@Rei-xq6yl When you understand why animals in a jungle always eat other animals, then you'll understand why humans are also the way they are. And if you have no fangs or claws, you will most likely be eaten by the creature that does.

[@helios2664]

@@Rei-xq6yl There are an incomprehensible amount of guns in America

[@richardsalley9848]

@@helios2664 Yeah...it gonna make it very difficult for another country to try and invade us by force too.

[@eponz4354]

Oh but it’s ok to send an 18 year to war that’s fine. Why don’t you place the blame where it belongs. On the killers feet! The school’s system for never upgrading their security and the poorly trained police officers. As officers we have to fight for training. So I bet it had been along time since they trained for active shooters.

[@t.texastimmy1022]

Most of these "somethings" will be overturned in the courts .... so congratulations on your wasted efforts.

[@monanoorch8699]

?

[@JCElzinga]

@@monanoorch8699 he is saying the current court is very pro 2a. almost everything proposed would be deemed unconstitutional.

[@monanoorch8699]

@@JCElzinga I don't understand about that document. because my knowledge is not that far. If you want to deal with other people, you have to be purposeful and use clear language. If you don't want to follow the laws of their country, you can make the decision to leave the country. Don't make it difficult..just an example from me.

[@chrismai539]

Mass shutting in New York what I thought they had every gun law in the books. It could take time for good guy with a gun to show up? Look at recent shooting at mall in Indiana. The good guy with a gun was already there.

[@jonnygraham2372]

I intend on bringing up warriors, you intend on raising victims. We are not the same.

[@KattalystFr]

average reddit comment

[@jonnygraham2372]

@@KattalystFr below average Reddit comment* 😈

[@chrismai539]

Most guns are semi automatic.

[@nokiot9]

We are seeing California and NY give the Supreme Court the finger. Taking steps to make it impossible to carry even with a permit. And we might actually see the NFA repealed in the next few years.

[@whatsmolly5741]

I wonder if they realize that if they take it too far the only thing they will encourage is mass non compliance, "just because we made this law impossible for you to follow doesn't mean you're not obligated to follow it" isn't california just great?

[@datcyanguy7812]

good

[@nokiot9]

@@datcyanguy7812 good? States defying the feds is how you get civil war and heavy economic sanctions that lead to it. I wouldn’t wanna be a citizen in either of those states over the next couple years.

[@nokiot9]

@@whatsmolly5741 I’m betting that it’ll encourage the feds to put massive federal grant sanctions on these two states at the very least

[@datcyanguy7812]

@@nokiot9 is there a solution to mass shootings? Right now no one is taking action and the supreme court is trying to make it easier for gun access

[@jebremocampo9194]

so glad these new laws are getting passed. Now law abiding criminals cannot hurt anyone else. We just have to worry about the criminals who DON'T obey the laws and regulations

[@danstenis660]

Guns cannot be compared to tobacco. Everyone knows that gun are deadly. Use at your own risk. The knowledge of tobacco being deadly also was not know, and even when known, was hidden from users by tobacco companies. The main problem with tobacco is that not everyone who smokes get cancer. And the cancer usually doesn't show up some 30 years later, depending amount and duration smoke, methods of tobacco use, and differences in genetics. And often times, the people who smoke are so addicted that they would rather take the chance of whether they would contract cancer than to stop smoking. Guns on the other hand will inflict serious pain, damage, and most likely death very quickly. Still want to compared guns to tobacco?

[@bfish9700]

The right of the people to keep and bear tobacco products shall not be infringed. . .wait, that's not how it does. . .

[@JohnAdams-vd5dc]

The dangers of tobacco were first announced by the CDC on January 11, 1964 and were suspected long before this announcement. Try not to be so disingenuous.

[@AdamSmith-gs2dv]

Tabbaco use is also NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT

[@tgworks5791]

Gun manuals literally say can cause harm or death. Tobacco companies lied about their products. Even paid doctors to say it was healthy.

[@danstenis660]

@@tgworks5791 Apparently human lives are not important compared to profits.

[@ironwolf3699]

Making something illegal doesn't make it impossible to break the law.

[@sgtslippyfist6345]

Very true

[@wilcowen6284]

So we should have no laws?

[@theMichaelMelo]

Shall not be infringed.

[@BG-mr5xv]

Maybe you should keep the criminals locked up. And hospitalize the violently insane.

[@TheArklyte]

Hot take: media is the problem, "news" stations that work by _entertainment_ industry metrics. IE... you guys?

[@christiancastro434]

it'd be a different story if media was forced to be non-profit

[@bannerbaggins]

Lee Harvey Oswald fired 3 shots and killed 2 people in less than 3 seconds with a bolt action rifle. That is faster than a semi auto

[@Anon54387]

And SO?

[@trevincox395]

Gun control only restricts citizens who abide by laws. The gang members and violent extremists who do not have any regard for the law will not be affected. The problem is that the young men who are committing these atrocities are broken and weak- we need to have a conversation about mental health.

[@wilcowen6284]

If you abide by the law you'll be fine

[@ShadowHawk99]

Really don't need an ar15 'for sport'

[@peterodaka7651]

I feel those who would allow the market dynamism to determine when to trade or not are either new in space generally or probably just naïve, the sphere have seen far worse times than this, enlightened traders continue to make good use of the dip and pump even acquiring more equities towards trading sessions, I'd say that more emphasis should be put into trading since it is way profitable than hodling. Trading went smooth for me as I was able to raise over 11.4 BTC when I started at 1.5 BTC in just a few weeks implementing trades with signals and insights from Jeff Erno, I would advise y'all to trade your asset rather than hodl for a future you aren't sure about or hold it and risk losing all....I left his contacts in the comment below take care!

[@peterodaka7651]

His Te-le-gram ( @Jefferno7 )

[@anton5259]

Great information as always mate, You push out the best content! I really want to be part of the community.

[@Jack-kw1qe]

Jeff daily signals has been so profitable… i am also looking forward to another successful month again 🔥🔥

[@antonypeter6892]

Jeff daily signal is top and one of the best out there when it comes to trading bitcoin.

[@jeno2432]

I was able to grow my portfolio too… from 0.6btc to 4.3btc with Jeff strategy within 4 weeks

[@El_Scorcho_]

I wonder how many dislikes this video has 🤔

[@khankrum1]

The big question is Will gun owners actually ALLOW to take their guns? I think not You will have Wako every two weeks!

[@MellyP1]

Fr

[@DJFLIPNO]

What psychopath or a criminal would comply?...this only affects the law abiding citizens that have a 9-5 jobs to provide for their families this is rubbish and it should be ignored by the Senate...

[@eyesonly4451]

We need to pass laws saying that one *_must be 21_* in order to purchase a gun or to vote. Yes, I understand the lame "but we allow 18 year olds fight for our country" argument. Joining the military nowadays is done primarily for a job. And 18 to 21 year olds *_should be allowed_* to join the military, but not allowed into active combat zones until the age of 21. Most significant military jobs take 2+ years of training, and deployment workup time is usually a year plus. So realistically, an 18 year old can easily be in the military 3 years before being qualified to enter an active war zone. And to be truthful, only 10% of everyone who joins the military will ever find themselves in hot zone. Most are pushing paper, moving and managing supplies, etc.

[@2bRealist]

...in other words, make 21 (NOT 18) the adult age across the nation??

[@clarkwilliam3520]

do you have experience in the military to know this timeline that you are saying? and where is your source for the 10% in a hot zone? also can you please define what a "hot zone" is?

[@MalibuGrailorProduct]

ISIS and the Taliban teach their young about Jihad at age 3. The USA want to keep guns out of the hands of our young to age 21. Billions of dollars worth of the best military grade weapons were left in Iraq and Afghanistan. Open boarders in Canada and open boarders in Mexico. Military Aid to Ukraine, ship it through Russia, Ship it to Afghanistan, ship it to USA to "closed" Air Force bases. We are being set-up for invasion!

[@MalibuGrailorProduct]

Don't believe me? Robb Elementary School Teacher kzbin.info1r88-yt5Y6A?feature=share

[@eyesonly4451]

@@clarkwilliam3520 I have a decade of "military dad" experience, meaning my son was Navy SOCOM and was deployed on multiple occasions into situations where people either were killed or could have been killed. Maybe that's a suitable definition of a "hot zone." On the 10% Google is your friend.

[@berineayala4767]

No gun control