The History of: The U.S.S. Enterprise J (NCC-1701-J) S2-E11

[@Krypton853]

I wanna see a Star Trek show base on Enterprise J

[@FQP-7024]

Who would not want it

[@Krypton853]

@@FQP-7024 I also want to see a Star Trek show base on Captain Pike instead we got a Picard.

[@FQP-7024]

@@Krypton853 yes I know these bastards at Hollywood are idiots but the I don't think we will be getting anything then the next Kelvin time line movie and the ...wait yes there will be a Captain Pike series they announced it a few weeks ago it's just going to take a few more months to finish up production.

[@Krypton853]

@@FQP-7024 I like Captain Picard as much as the next person but he is to old already no offense if you like Captain Picard

[@FQP-7024]

@@Krypton853 it's not the show it self that's bad it's the virtu signaling that's the problem in the show they are pulling in politics in something that should give us a break from politics.

[@loopslytle]

Thank you for this video. I have always liked the 'J' version. God bless you.

[@OmegaOrdained]

You're the best Roland ☺

[@henrytoledo4103]

I never realized how big the J is?!

[@SchardtCinematic]

This ship really needs fleshed out with more official specs and details.

[@MICROKNIGHT3000]

The J bridge was not properly made too damn so sad :(

[@Darthjardius]

I would love to see a Star Trek series that transcends all timelines.

[@OmegaOrdained]

Derek D hey they could do that with the Voyager time cops, do a show like that make good all different time and Star Trek history that be sweet

[@SchardtCinematic]

I'd live to know how thick the saucer section is? It looks very flat. But with being over 2 miles long and very wide. Thst saucer could be 5 to 10 decks deep. It's just that we've never gotyon right up close to the edge of the saucer section to look st it very good.

[@NapoleChan]

The J Enterprise really stands for Jadzia. Her Captain's yacht is called the USS Old Man lol

[@OmegaOrdained]

I love that! Hahahaha😆😆😆😆

[@sergeantseven4240]

Isn't Jadzia Dax dead though and wasn't Dax, last we knew, attached to Ezri?

[@OmegaOrdained]

Sergeant Seven true enough, but this is Star Trek, Spock died once and then he got better. LOL

[@JustPlainRex]

no really its operated by star fleet i would've never guessed

[@OmegaOrdained]

Hahaha😆😆😆

[@marsm9]

It's pronounced Pro-see-on. Just FYI.

[@OmegaOrdained]

Thank you ! :)

[@marsm9]

Omega Ordained You’re welcome :) I looked it up just to make sure I hadn’t been pronouncing it wrong lol.

[@stardude2006]

Pro - See - On Five

[@rhrpov916]

That curvy, interior corridor of Enterprise-J (from where one can see the bottom of the saucer), doesn't make any sense when it is compared to the actual ship on the wall.

[@charleswallace1123]

There will be a real one in the near future

[@markgritzan2841]

They should have made a good star trek series with this enterprise and not discovery

[@OmegaOrdained]

Mark Gritzan no doubt. Are we ever going to get another enterprise?

[@markgritzan2841]

Omega Ordained Even if it will just be an action series/movie. I am afraid the real star trek won't sell anymore.

[@davidwilson7579]

We're F G H I great to see these enterprises but I'll like to see a enterprise C film as the war ship

[@OmegaOrdained]

Enterprise D has always been my favorite Starship! However the enterprise-c is a very close second. I too would love to see it in any format doing anything LOL😎👍

[@davidwilson7579]

@@OmegaOrdained as enterprise c was only in one episode of next generation yesterday enterprise it be great to see this ship what it got up to in the war or the time line from the NX01 they bought to be a 02 or 03 90 year between nx01 to pikes enterprise

[@evertonporter7887]

Why all the fuss and palava in these comments? The real Enterprise J, when it eventually arrives in a future Trek series, won't look anything like this!

[@pinoi78]

There’s no damn way a starship this UGLY would be given the name Enterprise.

[@OmegaOrdained]

I agree, it looks like the engines would fall off their posts.

[@bobpearsall7737]

@@OmegaOrdained I bet you can make anything out of transparent carbon neutronium nanotubes!

[@johnmarks3179]

This would be much better without the use of the out of place announcer voice. Just talk like a normal human.

[@OmegaOrdained]

What dose it mean to be human?

[@drwho6908]

To much Temporal and Alternative Universe crap.one Timeline, one Universe. Let DrWho do the time and Alternative Universe stuff. It shows the writers have run out of ideas. Thats one reason Enterprise lasted only 3 years. Did the Enterprise D ever do time travel? And there was never any mention of the Lizard guys from Enterprise in TNG. I know Voyager had Temporal adventures especially The Year From Hell.

[@OmegaOrdained]

The year of hell is my favorite time travel stores of all time.

[@OmegaOrdained]

She sure did! Twice in fact lol😎👍

[@CardboardSliver]

Everytime I see this ship, I throw up a little in my mouth. Abramsprise at least looks like a Federation starship, this...this looks like trash.

[@OmegaOrdained]

Totally agree, Enterprise J was too foreign / alien-looking. It had somewhat the Federation color is right that was it

[@ZiggEnt86]

This ship, for me, is very "not star trek". Likely the worst looking version of the Enterprise.

[@dustinsollars2355]

THANK YOU! Finally someone agrees!

[@CardboardSliver]

I also agree. J is ass ugly.

[@MrPobanz]

This has to be not only the ugliest, but also most nonsensical ship design in Star Trek.

[@OmegaOrdained]

Mr. Popanz not one of my favorites, in fact I think it's my least favorite lol

[@billtree52]

Can you explain how any starship design makes sense compared to real life space travel?

[@MrPobanz]

Sure, no problem, though its gonna be rather what makes the least sense: While one doesn't have to care about air resistance in space which makes aerodynamic constructions unnecessary (aka Mass Effect's Normandy with its cute rear spoiler makes no sense for example), there are still inertia related structural issues, which means that every unnecessary extension from the center of mass is a weak spot. In other words: the Borg sphere would be the best design to endure changes in velocity without structural failures and the more you depart from that design, the higher the strain on the whole structure especially the parts farther away from the center. Taking that into account, designs like the Enterprise D are worse than the Voyager with warp gondolas being the worst offender, though explained as necessary, thus excusable (while the Voyager variant is far superior to the Ent D one) and the Enterprise J with its incredibly thin structure being just ridiculous without even taking into account other practical factors. There's also a logistical reason why a thinner disc shape is less favorable to one with more volume (more possible vectors of movement improve deployment speed, to make it short). Surely it's not about being as realistic as possible, hardly any design in Star Trek comes even close to being a "good spaceship" (and i have no problem with that, "rule of cool"), still the designs have to be "believable" and I'd argue that none have to take even a semester at engineering to simply take a look at the Ent J to know something doesn't look right.

[@OmegaOrdained]

Very well put. I thought the Borg cube would terrible in an atsomosphere , but I guess it is like an 80's semi truck?

[@MrPobanz]

Yeah, it probably wouldn't break any speed records with that frame but it would easily beat any Formula 1 counterpart when it comes to endurance!

[@snakeplissken2018]

My personal opinion is that is one ugly ship I wish star trek was more traditional when designing new ships

[@OmegaOrdained]

This is a very weird looking ship. However it is from the future, way in the future LOL. Maybe it looks normal in that timeline hahaha😎👍