The Illusion of the Observer Audiobook

The Link for the study-guid we will publish it soon, thank you for your understanding.
shorturl.at/Fbtwf
The point of this essay is to inquire into the nature of perception and to determine the true significance of the role of the observer in perception. We will be concerned with the observer in his purest form, stripped of all emotions, experience, and memories. In attempting to define the nature and role of the observer, it is not my intention to add yet another theory to the countless many already in existence concerning the nature of man and the universe. My intention is to stimulate a deeper understanding of perception by throwing new light on an aspect of perception which is taken for granted, misunderstood, or denied. To better understand any process, it is necessary for us to understand the cause of the process. Because the observer is so deeply involved in perception, his presence is usually the last thing to be noted, if it is noticed at all. This is comparable to an analysis of the causes of sedimentation on the ocean floor, to which it is replied that the cause is the presence of the ocean itself.
******
We hope you're enjoying the content on our KZbin channel. If you've been finding our videos helpful or entertaining, we'd really appreciate it if you could take a moment to subscribe to our channel. We put a lot of time and effort into creating these videos, and your support means a lot to us. Thanks for watching, and we hope to see you again soon.
******
All materials in these videos are used for educational purposes and fall within the guidelines of fair use. No copyright infringement is intended. If you are or represent the copyright owner of materials used in this video and have a problem with the use of said material, please contact me via my email in the "about" page on my channel.
#audiobook #discipline #observer

[@Itsyaboycnova]

No wonder things are the way they are. Since this audiobook was approved to be released, it proves on its own how innacurate and incapable this certain project is. Those behind it obviously arent in any position to try to pull this off again. If so then we some more laughs and perfect examples of what not to do.

[@andruss2001]

Thanks! Observing how particle moves through both slits at once, observer doesn't believe that it is possible, therefore in my opinion, the observed superposition collapses into material thing. Only because of disbelief of the observer. Some may argue: wave function may collapse without an observer present. But I believe that in any observation the conscious observer is present as a final step. There are no observations without conscious observer. What about timing? John Wheeler's Delayed Choice experiment shows us that there maybe no notion of time on a quantum level, so that observation done in the "future" changes "past" events as well.

[@flowisdom-booknotes]

Your pointing some interesting stuff 🤔, for my self i don't have a clear through about this. In future i will replay again. Glad that you enjoyed our content.

[@AxemanMessiah]

Correct, the particle does not even render as the there is no observer, local realism.

[@GudLawdHammercy]

kzbin.infoUgkxFH4yjUgywxjdjPIt4JxZi_6A9LtBoEmc?si=nJAH8gDGNAQcu8aG

[@GudLawdHammercy]

I don't know why more people don't know about how the doubleslit actually works kzbin.infoUgkxFH4yjUgywxjdjPIt4JxZi_6A9LtBoEmc?si=nJAH8gDGNAQcu8aG

[@robinhood6954]

Yes, "changing 'past' events".... Now you're really getting into something... 👍

[@mmganesh6087]

also read a pdf " how quantum physics can defeat atheism. by a german professor Peter zoller GREER.

[@flowisdom-booknotes]

We will take a look on it, thnx

[@TimberWolfmanV6]

Impartial observer free of mind chatter .. academic examination of this is futile, see beginning of this comment, yw 🙏

[@v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096]

I love critical thinking. Whether in a learning envrionment or learning through mistakes. You dont need to know every answer. Deep breath, think. I've walked into examinations, without studying, & perhaps a little "Jetlegged," from previous eve adventures. Mantra: Think Critically. The answer is already written down (multiple Q's; choose A-D/E / same for true & false. Again with written exams. The one tool that will take you great places, CRITICAL THINKING🤔

[@frederickanderson1860]

4 people who witness a event do not have same perception as we believe.

[@flowisdom-booknotes]

Yes that true, from my side it depends in the nolage and the stat of the emotion we have. If all this things line for the 4 people i believe that they will have the same view point

[@frederickanderson1860]

@@flowisdom-booknotes l mean to have 4 different views but they all eventually fit a pattern

[@greuni]

I see that to be true. Each witness can only perceive what their bias of information allows, therefore they will each pay attention to specifics details which differ from each other. Numerous aspects will limit the scope of what is seen. Take the basketball game test reveals. If this reference is new, the video can be found on KZbin to experience.

[@OnSenseAndReference]

But who is the author of this essay?

[@dwayneambrose7951]

UG. KRISHNAMURTI

[@flowisdom-booknotes]

One of the deepest man

[@veronicadiaz7031]

The Observer bakes energy WAVES into matter ( add the10% of visible light according light spectrum). therefore perception, plus energy thoughts to all this FILM PR0JECTION starts... In my humble opinion of perceptions

[@DavidJohnson-xr2rz]

THE OBSERVER PHENOMENON DEMYSTIFIED. STRAIGHTFORWARD EXPLANATION. According to Information Theory (which is both a restatement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the foundation of modern communication and computation technology), information comprises a change of state. The energy required to produce that state must be provided by the event being observed. Therefore the thing being observed has also changed. The process of observation is one direction in time, in keeping with the Second Law. However as the amount of energy. approaches being too small to effect a change of state, there is a condition of superposition where it becomes uncertain whether or not the change of state will occur. This is definable as Heisenberg's Uncertainty. The Schroeder's Cat hypotheses is anthropomorphic bullshit. Szilard's solution to Maxwell 's Demon got it right.

[@robinhood6954]

Still not straightforward enough for me! It hardly matters whether this world is 'real' or 'not real'. There's still that surreptitious clique of parasites working overtime trying to kill most of us off and completely taking it over! So it can't be that unreal! Lol!

[@v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096]

Great vid!!

[@motatheautist2225]

Another book that we make me question reality and give me an existential crisis lezgo

[@thepercepter]

Maybe instead of questioning reality. Look at it like an exploration of something new. You my friend just like all humans are responsible on how you see your reality. Just wanted to share.

[@flowisdom-booknotes]

Try to understand as another viewpoint

[@flowisdom-booknotes]

One of the best way to approach another viewpoint

[@robinhood6954]

​@@thepercepterWhat about animals..?

[@thepercepter]

@@robinhood6954 I’m not clear on what you are asking? based on what I responded animals are responsible for how they see reality and they don’t pretend to question. They perform the task to live which I would say is equal to exploration. Don’t forget we ourselves are animals as we live on this planet just the same.