The Krishnamurti Podcast - Ep. 94 - Krishnamurti on Anonymity and Creativity

[@zhizhi9138]

Such a pure soul.

[@Sahilsharma-ce4ow]

Best podcast to listen to.

[@renukatandon7463]

very well explained one of the best podcast THANKS K THANKS FOR UPLOADING

[@lynnkidd080]

The old authoritative learning model is over. Creation of the new is the willingness to experience what's really here -"a state of mind without time, and therefore receiving something which is not measurable, and what is seen and felt and experiencing is of the moment and not to be stored away."

[@makrandjani1705]

Thank you very much for sharing such a wonderful collection of Krishnamurti.

[@tharunkumar3481]

Thank You ❤️

[@Rahim.S.V]

49:29 ❤❤❤

[@xKevmachinex]

we register too much, our brains are always on alert for pointless information that we allow to consume us, He has a point, emotions are not a bad thing but we allow them to control us too much, we need to get intouch with our inner self we need to rein in our emotions and we need to open our minds beyond what we currently do.

[@sophiyapoudel9164]

thanks

[@quotesdior686]

17:54 makhi aa gayi

[@Rahim.S.V]

❤❤❤

[@nexstory]

The impulse to change is very different than the stimulus to change. Unfortunately for our human race, the impulse is nowhere to be found, or should I say, it was taken away from each of us through parental, then societal indoctrination from the earliest age. For decades. Krishnamurti exhorted each of us to look without movement, not as statues, but as keen observers at the many forms of violence that make up both our inner as well as outer lives. I sat at the Oak Grove on various occasions, transfixed like so many of my peers to what Krishnamurti had to say, and after his talks, we each went home, or with friends went to dine and talk at one of the local Ojai cafes. It often appeared that we each understood what he said until the other spoke as we quietly shook our heads. Perhaps you are doing this now as your read and reflect on my words. My issue with the whole of it has little to do with who or what is enlightenment, but rather with the speaker/listener format, which is how practically every event planner since the beginning of time has shaped the same old protocols. By setting the stage and seating around the speaker (authority), the audience invariably remains a field of unharnessed possibilities that for a period of an hour or two opens and then immediately afterwards closes its eyes. If this were not the case, the collective we would not be experiencing the violence that is all about as well as within us today. To imagine otherwise is not detachment but a disassociative state pretending otherwise. Enlightenment has little to do with whether one sees one's world in black and white or technicolor but rather all to do with how that experience is conveyed. Is it palpable? Can it be shaped into industries, communities of co-creative vision and purpose, or is it just some on stage guru du jour who had an epiphany, bottled it into a book, and then sold it on a publicity tour to large audiences looking to buy prime real estate in the here and now? There is an urgency to change. Change is either lateral, deteriorative, or transformative. Individual transformation is nonsense and promotes the myth of the individual, which is narcissism, no matter how ill or well-intentioned it is expressed. Unless the field itself is enlightened, (which is the entire weave of humanity), then no point, however brilliant, can save the day. To change the field would require a tremendous amount of imagination, energy, resources, and focus that none of our industries, governments, health, and educational systems were ever designed to foster. God knows if you even had the bandwidth to read this to the end.

[@TheMonacarol]

❤️

[@ramongomez8849]

🙏🏻

[@rajattripathi2304]

🙏🙏

[@Happyroma7]

☺️

[@Happyroma7]

♥️